EMAIL SIGN UP!
Most Popular This Week
- German Official Warns of Immediate 'Revolution' if EU Adopts US Model
- Eve of Destruction (or How to Destroy a Planet Without Really Trying)
- President Obama Uses a Sledgehammer Against Dissent
- 'We Are Movement, Not a Moment': North Carolina Peaceful Uprising Continues
- We’re Being Watched: How Corporations and Law Enforcement Are Spying on Environmentalists
- Eve of Destruction (or How to Destroy a Planet Without Really Trying)
- We’re Being Watched: How Corporations and Law Enforcement Are Spying on Environmentalists
- Is Enbridge Building a Secret Keystone Pipeline?
- German Official Warns of Immediate 'Revolution' if EU Adopts US Model
- President Obama Uses a Sledgehammer Against Dissent
Popular content
Today's Top News
In Berlin, Hope for the Fall of Other Walls
'Let us remember this history," Barack Obama said in the peroration of his speech in Berlin last week, "and answer our destiny, and remake the world once again." The progression in that sequence is exactly right. Remaking the world requires a reckoning with history, and Berlin, perhaps more than any other city, is the place where that must happen. On the eve of World War I, 94 years ago today, Berlin was the site of Germany's last antiwar demonstration, routed by police. The failure of Weimar, the torchlight parades of brown shirts, Kristallnacht, the Fuehrer bunker, mass rape, the occupation zones, the death strip, the Wall - "this history." Nikita Khrushchev declared, "Berlin is the testicles of the West . . . When I want to make the West scream, I squeeze on Berlin."
Obama built his speech around the noble history of the Berlin Airlift, when, for a year, the US Air Force defied that squeeze by flying food and coal into the western half of the city, trumping a Soviet blockade. American support, symbolized by NATO and the Marshall Plan, both of which Obama acknowledged, was key to the new identity that Europe then embraced. But it was the nonviolent reinvention of the former belligerents, with Germany, especially, becoming a pacifist nation, that made the final difference. Unlike other American politicians who routinely claim that the United States "won" the Cold War, Obama credited the crowd to whom he was speaking near the former site of the Berlin Wall. "When you, the German people, tore down that wall . . . walls came tumbling down around the world." At last, an American leader was crediting the world-historic outbreak of non-violence in 1989 as the political force it was.
The Cold War is long over, but Obama defined its remaining unfinished business - which is "seeking the peace of a world without nuclear weapons." In naming this and other "walls" that must be brought down now, he invoked again the humane "spirit that led airlift planes to appear in the sky above our heads." But does the airlift saga, perhaps, contain its own contradictory implication?
When John F. Kennedy declared himself a citizen of Berlin, he was deflecting attention from his earlier refusal to act against the erection of the Berlin Wall. When Ronald Reagan cried, "Mister Gorbachev, tear down this wall," he was ignoring the drastic actions that Gorbachev was already taking that led exactly to that. When Obama honored the Berlin Airlift - "the planes that flew over Berlin did not drop bombs" - he made apparent the need for a much fuller reckoning with the other history of American air power that expressly involves Berlin.
Early in February 1945, the British Bomber Command presented a plan for a massive escalation of strategic bombing. Dubbed "Operation Thunderclap," the idea was to obliterate one solid square mile of downtown Berlin, making no pretense of distinguishing military and civilian targets. The Americans balked, with one senior Army Air Forces general saying such a "baby-killing scheme" would be "a blot on the history of the Air Forces and of the United States." But that general was overruled, and Thunderclap was ordered. The Allied attack on Berlin was so successful that it was followed quickly by similar raids throughout Germany, climaxing two weeks later in Dresden. The mile-square strategy was tried a week later in Tokyo. That success led to the March 9 Tokyo raid in which 16 square miles were obliterated, killing more than 100,000 civilians. The strongest rationale for use of the atomic bomb against Hiroshima was that America had already crossed the threshold into mass murder from the air. We crossed it in Berlin.
"I know my country has not perfected itself . . ." Obama said. "There are times when our actions around the world have not lived up to our best intentions." America is at its best not just when our noblest ideals are realized, but also when our betrayals of those ideals are acknowledged. There is the Berlin Airlift. There is the terror bombing of Berlin. There is the unfinished business of nuclear abolition, the burden of which belongs more to the United States than any nation. "I love America," Obama told Berlin, having just proved it both with his words, and with what his words implied.
James Carroll's column appears regularly in the Globe.
© Copyright 2008 Globe Newspaper Company
Comments
Note: Disqus 2012 is best viewed on an up to date browser. Click here for information. Instructions for how to sign up to comment can be viewed here. Our Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines. Note to Readers: Spam Filter May Capture Legitimate Comments...

16 Comments so far
Show All"The real threat to U.S. military power is nuclear proliferation, because if every little country has nuclear weapons it becomes very tricky for the United States to engage in military action."
Immanuel Wallerstein
>>Oh, bullshit. The whole history of US anti-communism was not "noble," any more than the War on Terror is. It was very much the same thing.<<
Interesting since we won the Cold War, the Soviets are gone and Eastern Europe is firmly in American control. If that was possible and the GWOT was like the Cold War which was won, then maybe it can be won too given enough time and money and lives.
As for Kruschev not being an ogre, I agree, but he wasn't a saint either. Ask the Poles and the Hungarians or the Berliners what a nice guy he was or the peasants in the Donbass in the 1930's. Or Lavrentiy Beria for that matter. Kruschev had many chances to ease the suffering of the Russian and other subjugated peoples and stood fast to Socialism instead.
There goes the mainstream left-liberal press scruffing up "the new Obama."
The *old* Obama was the one that came off the assembly line BEFORE he captured the Democratic nomination.
*That* Obama was the peace candidate Obama.
This new Obama is the one who supports wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, as well as potential wars in Iran and Pakistan.
It's really quite remarkable how DESPERATE the liberal-left is. How quickly they've come to praise Obama's Berlin speech. ("Gee, what a great speech! I bet he could sell loads of Amway shit!")
Meanwhile, the liberal-left (e.g., the above article by James Carroll) shows no hesitancy buying into the idea that "the real war" needs to be fought in Afghanistan. ... And maybe Iran. ... And maybe Pakistan.
And maybe it's ok, like Obama says, if we keep troops in Iraq indefinitely. And, beyond that, you know, if "things change," then maybe Obama would have to change his policy on Iraq *again.*
"Change, Change, Change." Hey, left-liberals, you got screwed again! The only change you're gonna get is Obama changing
from pseudo-peace candidate to the *real* Obama -- military-industrial groupie.
-- See Obama run... for change.
-- See *Obama* change.
-- See the liberal-left get screwed again.
You would think that the mainstream liberal media would be outraged at how Obama lurched so quickly to the right. But oh no! Just throw the liberals a "good speech" and they scruff it up, like the desperate souls they are.
I get a big kick out of left-liberal pundits "advising" Democratic candidates, e.g., Obama, on how to win. ... "Well, see, if Obama moves left on trade and then, in the South, if he mves right on civil liberties. And if that doesn't work if he moves to the center after he moves to the left."
Hey, maybe if he had some, you know, core-principles. Eh?
Obama's core-principles are that he's a corporatist. A mouthpiece for Corporate America. Always was, always will be.
I get a big kick out of how left-liberals say -- "Well, once Obama gets in office, once he's elected presicent, we'll pull him to the left."
Right! Like the left-liberal media is pulling him to the left now? What a joke.
Vote Nader. Vote McKinney. Or else vote socialist.
Vote your conscience.
See the following for more on Obama - http://www.wsws.org/articles/2008/jul2008/obaw-j25.shtml
Obama said. "There are times when our actions around the world have not lived up to our best intentions."
How did the Iraq war go so wrong, when our intentions to rob and rape their country were so good?
Gorbachev made the fatal mistake of trusting the corporate-dominated West a bit too much. Whatever the Soviet government's faults, most of those in charge of it sure knew that if the Soviet Union ever "opened up" and the Western corporations and Western propaganda were allowed in to the territory of the then Soviet Union, breathtaking plunder would be the result. All the pabulum that the US government and its politicians and the corporate media issued forth for decades about "freeing" the long-suffering people of the Soviet Union was merely propaganda designed to facilitate the removal of a competing power and to open up more resources for exploitation. However, like Iraq, it is still unclear just how much success the predatory corporations will find there.
The problem you folks are having with Obama is really with the American electorate which is too right-center for your enlightened ideals. It is too bad that there are so many morons who are militaristic, ultra-patriots or just plain stupid, but that is the way it is and you had better hope that Obama wins or your ideals will really get no purchase with the former Maverick who now is a Bush II wannabe.
If Obama reduces nuclear weapons, overturns the Gag rule of God's Own Party, and keeps the economy away from total collapse, it will be very positive change from current trends.
Sixteen times Obama yelled in Berlin: "tear down these walls". In the countries with REAL walls, Iraq and Israel/West Bank, this cowardly person kept his mouth shut about tearing down these walls. How obscene.
If you read the entire speech, it sounded like he was campaigning for Global President.
http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/obamaroadblog/gGxyd4
The walls he was talking about were the walls of sovereignty preventing One World Government.
His references to Zimbabwe, Sudan, Burma and Iran were for potential UN or American wars.
This speech could easily have been written for Bush.
Bush would have rightfully cut this part"
"As we speak, cars in Boston and factories in Beijing are melting the ice caps in the Arctic, shrinking coastlines in the Atlantic, and bringing drought to farms from Kansas to Kenya."
Maybe when he said he would have to be dealing with these leaders for the next 8-10 years, he meant 8 years as US president, and 4 years as US President followed by 6 years as Global President. Ya think?
>>Sixteen times Obama yelled in Berlin: "tear down these walls". In the countries with REAL walls, Iraq and Israel/West Bank, this cowardly person kept his mouth shut about tearing down these walls. How obscene.<<
Some walls are good. Some keep peace. Some save lives. We should tear down the ones that harm and support the walls that protect. I think Obama is going to do just that. I wouldn't count on any changes in the MidEast with him in charge. One of the reasons I support him. He's really going to be the best president in 50 years. He will support Israel and still be the progressive choice at home. Of course Clinton and Edwards would have supported Israel too...
Cozy up to AIPAC, abe foxmann, and the elderly in Boca and you to can get elected president of Israel ... oooops I mean America. How about that!
German cities prior to Thunderclap:
www.guardian.co.uk/world/gallery/2008/jul/10/german.cities?picture=335587512
Obama: "a much fuller reckoning" is necessary. YEP!
"'I love America.' Obama told Berlin."
It's telling and tragic that Obama didn't have it in his heart to cry to Berlin: "I love people, humanity! Let us end all war."
goose2 says:
"Some walls are good. Some keep peace. Some save lives. We should tear down the ones that harm and support the walls that protect. I think Obama is going to do just that. I wouldn't count on any changes in the MidEast with him in charge. One of the reasons I support him. He's really going to be the best president in 50 years. He will support Israel and still be the progressive choice at home. Of course Clinton and Edwards would have supported Israel too…'
I for one appreciate this refreshing honesty from one of our Zionist apologists. He is voting for Obama because he is now convinced that genocide and ethnic cleansing at the hands of his supremacist buddies will continue, no matter how much it fucks up America and the world.
And as can be seen from his statement, this is all that matters. Oh yes, he hopes a few bones will be thrown to the goyim to keep us happy, but it all comes down to Israel.
Like I said, I find it refreshing that someone so utterly amoral has no problem owning up to his complete lack of humanity. And of course, that symbolizes Zionism itself quite nicely.
I might also add that the reason I take offense at responses like this here at CD (and generally ignore them elsewhere) is that it is no more possible to be a Zionist, or even a supporter of Israel, and a true liberal any more than it is possible to be a true Christian and support torture and war.
I will wait patiently for the sure to come oink oink from the aggrieved parties.