Subscribe to Common Dreams News Updates
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
A Model for Real Community Energy Self-Sufficiency
The recent G8 Summit achieved one important result. It showed that too many of our leaders still think energy "security" can be achieved by calling for an increase in the rate of oil extraction at the expense of human and ecosystem health.
They are looking for security in the wrong places. For a real lesson in energy security, and a glimpse of the healthy local economy of the future, they could start with a small town in Germany, just one of many in northern Europe that are charting a course toward true energy autonomy, based on renewable sources of energy.
The town of Freiamt generates its entire electricity needs from locally owned renewable sources, and then sells a 30 per cent surplus to generate revenue.
Freiamt is a cluster of villages of 4,300 people in the Black Forest. Its economy is dominated by farming, tourism and small-scale forestry. For the burghers of Freiamt, questions of "the environment" come down to how to ensure that the soil, forests, water, air and natural beauty of the region are preserved and yet still harnessed to maximize economic and social benefit.
The same converging forces threatening towns and cities globally (shrinking natural resources, peaking supplies of oil and uranium, climate change and tightening competition for all of these as a result of population growth), make Freiamt as potentially vulnerable as any other community. But vulnerable is not in the vocabulary of the people of Freiamt.
For the last five years, Freiamt has been pursuing the goal of total energy self-sufficiency. While the strategy is still young, it is clearly working, in a way that defies conventional beliefs, not just in Canada and the rest of the G8, but in parts of Germany as well. At least those parts that still believe that energy security lies in big generation stations, big energy companies and big investment.
Proving that "small is beautiful," Freiamt generates so much power from its small-scale renewable sources that it is turning an annual profit. It did so by adding four wind turbines and 800 rooftop photovoltaic systems to its existing small-scale hydro and biomass installations. Freiamt now generates 13 million kilowatt hours of power. Since it only consumes 10 million locally, the surplus three million are sold to other parts of Germany via the national grid, generating income for residents and businesses.
The Freiamt story is as much about "power" as energy. Although much of the technical expertise and all of the equipment comes from outside Freiamt, the citizens were adamant that they wanted to own their future, by owning and controlling the turbines and the rooftop photovoltaic (PV) and solar thermal installations. The wind turbines are jointly owned, as are many of the solar panel arrays on buildings such as the soccer clubhouse. Other PV systems are privately owned and installed on homes, barns and garages.
Biogas digesters have been built on several farm properties in a joint "co-op" arrangement whereby a group of citizens invests together, spreads the risk and shares the revenue. In addition to earning a significant return for the investors, these biogas systems have provided a holistic solution to the problems of farm waste that can pollute rural water supplies and emit greenhouse gasses such as methane.
Several factors are critical to the success of the Freiamt project. First is citizen support. The buy-in of individuals was achieved when they became convinced that neither the wind turbines nor the large solar arrays would cause significant visual or noise pollution and that the potential financial return would be a safe investment, with the money being retained locally.
Underpinning the financial case is a federal law that triggered an explosion of renewable energy investment in Germany. The so-called "feed-in tariff" guarantees that renewable energy suppliers receive a premium rate from energy companies for the electricity they feed into the national grid. This guarantee provides the certainty individuals and banks need to invest in renewables.
As a result, tens of thousands of Germans and dozens of towns, co-ops and companies have installed renewable energy systems.
Freiamt is not alone. Other towns like Dardesheim, Halberstadt and Mauenheim are producing all or much of their energy needs, and many more are known to be developing similar plans.
Freiamt has built a low-carbon economy, and is moving steadily closer to being a no-carbon community. If things get rough out there beyond the Black Forest, it is capable of functioning and thriving without the continual intravenous feeding that other places require from the power grid, natural gas pipeline or supertanker.
As long as the sun shines, the wind blows and the grass grows, Freiamt will be making energy and selling it at a profit. That is resilience.
Freiamt offers us a glimpse of what a thriving economy built on a healthy environment can look like. A glimpse of what any town or province in Canada could accomplish, in its own way and on its own terms. A glimpse of real energy security.
David Chernushenko is an Ottawa-based writer and filmmaker specializing in sustainability issues. He produced the film Be the Change (www.livinglightly.ca/film).
© Times Colonist (Victoria) 2008



7 Comments so far
Show AllIt is in the rural Third World where these efforts can quickly yield results. We in the Honduran countryside and on our farms need so little to keep us in control of our power and our future. How can we get a good program started. No giant corporations or NGOs to start with please!
"Freiamt has built a low-carbon economy, and is moving steadily closer to being a no-carbon community."
Not to be a naysayer, but...I truly wonder:
1. If Freiamt is "moving steadily closer to being a no-carbon community" overall, since the article does not discuss all the petroleum that went into resource extraction, transformation, manufacturing and transportation of the components of the "low-carbon economy" of Freiamt. The article does not acknowledge that it is gasoline for transportation of very heavy transport vehicles needed for the techno-industrial civilization as a whole that is the major CO2 offender, not the local consumption of petroleum-based products.
2. Whether the so-called "low-carbon" community is not specious science grounded more in political ideology than in the methods of empirical science, which demand structured controlled repeatable experimentation based on verifiable and falsifiable hypotheses. Unfortunately, the whole movement toward minimal "carbon footprint" is not based on the same methods of empirical science that built the techno-industrial civilization in the first place. Rather, the carbon-concern is based on computer-based modeling and prognostication that cannot be either verified or falsified by controlled experimentation. This is a common mistake among those who follow Gore. Please remember: Gore is a politician. He is most def NOT a scientist. And most scientists that I have worked with -- and I have personally worked with many hundreds of them at companies like General Dynamics and Xerox -- do not see the carbon-concern as based on sound science.
I, for one, am all for the return to what others have called "appropriate technology" (AT). But the AT approach requires the return to a pre-techno-industrial civilization, something that takes a good deal more commitment and self-discipline than even Freiamt has achieved. Nevertheless, I think we should appreciate that they are way beyond what most of us are even contemplating at the local level.
If you have any ideas for AT please contribute them to:
www.sillyConValley.net
We won't do it until the energy crisis gets worse.
Robert, just start small and build your understanding of how the renewable systems work, and then how they work best.
Pick one house or building in your community and convert it to be self-sufficient. Now you have a base or a control to expand and improve upon.
In your part of the world there can be abundant sources of flowing water, so in addition to wind and solar, check out micro-hydro electric prodution as well;
http://www.motherearthnews.com/Renewable-Energy/1982-11-01/A-Profitable-Private-Microhydroelectric-Plant.aspx
"Underpinning the financial case is a federal law that triggered an explosion of renewable energy investment in Germany. The so-called "feed-in tariff" guarantees that renewable energy suppliers receive a premium rate from energy companies for the electricity they feed into the national grid. This guarantee provides the certainty individuals and banks need to invest in renewables."
************
This is the key to this town's success. There is no reason that a similar law could not be passed in the U.S. Congress and begin a revolution in the decentralization of power generation. The existing power companies would become the "just in case the sun stops shining or the wind stops blowing" back up. Instead of escalating power bills there could be dividends for efficinecy and conservation. Most important a sense of community could be rebuilt among the bedroom communities and in the midst of urban and suburban sprawl.
You can say what you want about not accounting for the petroleum use that went into the making of the PV modules etc., but the fact remains that the equipment is generating power which is more than the previous situation. I agree that we need careful studies, but I think that we also need to do somehting. Gore is a pol. That is true. But there are alot of scientists in the IPCC. They think global warming is real. Do you disagree with them?
The most efficient solar systems are solar themal water heating. Try them out first. Solar laterns are also good.
Thanks to Rainbow Warrior for the hydropower link and the suggestions. I have had a small solar panel for about eight years and am on the way to building a bio-digester for about 10 cows. We like the idea of responding to needs as they present themselves, while avoiding big cash outlays. But something of community is lacking in the effort. AT is not, as Schumacher was careful to point out, pre-technological. It is high technology, maybe think miniaturization. We do not have to think about going back.