Presidential candidate Cynthia McKinney has moved from blue to green, and similarly, she demonstrated her move to the left side of the political spectrum in a speech she gave in Durham: "It's time to move from protest to resistance."
McKinney, a former six-term Democratic congresswoman turned newly minted Green Party candidate for president, spoke at two events Tuesday, laying out her policy stances on more than a half-dozen issues.
Before a receptive audience of 25 at The Know Bookstore & Restaurant on Fayetteville Street, McKinney, who represented Georgia's 4th District but who now lives in California, spoke for nearly two hours about ballot access, voter fraud, a George W. Bush impeachment, wartime spending, college debt, corporate lobbyists, Hurricane Katrina, and the racial gap in home ownership.
The speech appeared to be more of a policy talk than a presidential speech, and Green Party officials set McKinney's aspirations low: besting Nader's 2,000-odd votes that he received in the 2000 election in North Carolina. N.C. Green Party co-chair Jan Martell said she was "hoping" the party had collected 500 signatures by Tuesday, the deadline for McKinney to qualify as a write-in candidate. Meanwhile, McKinney raised $600 in contributions, according to party officials, and checks, collected in a Tupperware bin, were made payable to Power to the People, her election committee.
McKinney was eager to discuss electoral politics in general. She pointed to Mexican presidential candidate Andres Manuel Lopez Obrador, who established a secondary government in Mexico City following his narrow defeat in 2006, as a model action compared to Al Gore's and John Kerry's concessions in 2000 and 2004.
She also cited the ascendancy of Venezuelan president Hugo Chávez and other leftist leaders in Latin America as evidence of the "power of the people" being heard at the voting booth.
"What's the difference between us and that?" she asked. "The blue pill we've been asked to swallow."
She blamed the mainstream media, in part, for distributing the pill, and for allegedly distorting events ranging from Martin Luther King Jr.'s life to the genocide in Darfur. She called the latter a "cover story of atrocity that no one can disagree with" that media outlets focused on in order to justify U.S. occupation of Sudan. (While some foreign aid and humanitarian organizations urged the U.S. to intervene the humanitarian crisis, detractors, including the Canada-based Global Centre for Research on Globalization, have taken a stand similar to McKinney's.)
"Did you ever stop to think that every one of those corporate entities has as bottom line?" she asked. "We've got to figure out another way to get our information, so we can think outside the box."
At several points in her speech, McKinney hesitated to complete her thoughts because of the presence of a video camera and reporters. She pointed out that 9/11 happened shortly after the World Conference against Racism in South Africa, in which a proposal on slavery reparations had been considered. While McKinney said she was not "suggesting any linkages," she added that black interests were "taken off the table" following the terrorist attacks. "If in fact there is a program to deny black people in this country from selecting their own leaders, then there not only should be reparations, but we are dealing with genocide."
McKinney drew national attention following 9/11 when she said that President Bush deliberately ignored warnings of the attack because his allies would stand to profit from the War on Terror. Following those comments, she lost her House seat in 2002, though she was elected again in 2004 and went on to organize hearings on 9/11 and the federal government's response to Hurricane Katrina.
Earlier in the day, she spoke to a half-dozen supporters and members of the media, in front of the downtown post office in Durham. There, she said that Sens. Barack Obama and John McCain had offered war as the only solution to the foreclosure crisis.
In an interview after the two speeches, McKinney said that, despite Obama's plan to remove troops from Iraq, the presumptive Democratic nominee would continue combat missions in Afghanistan, and look to Iran and Pakistan as potential future theaters of operation.
"The push toward war is still very real, and people need not to accept the-what do you call it?-bait-and-switch," she said.
Willie Muhammand, who attended both speeches, said in an interview that he would vote for McKinney, though he hadn't voted for anyone since Richard Nixon in 1960.
"Anybody who stands up against our government, in the open, I'm behind them. I stand up for her, because of her outspokenness years ago," he said.
© 2008 Independent Weekly
Delicious
Digg
StumbleUpon
Newsvine
Facebook
Google
Yahoo
Technorati
121 Comments so far
Show Alltaillcap vericity and Lesserevilism, changeeebefforelate and any others who I have oppressed with my writing ,, I apologize if you think I am the problem because I point out the 3rd party myth and how it keeps us progressives and liberals and all Americans divided and that is the game and you guys fall for the Little League division of the System.
the truth hurts when you are pushing a myth...
I guess i am evil for writing for all to see That Obama is the Best realistic choice but you guys can only see EvillLLLLLLL
Happy voting and you guys haven't told us who your voting for ... it must be important would you like to share?
A number of those posting on this site have taken the way her meetings in Durham were described by the reporter as accurate and also as representative of her pitiful level of public support. "Crowd estimation" is an old ploy of those wishing to promote or denigrate a candidacy, and this reporter, or at least the one who wrote the headline of his story, seemed intent in putting a label of "incendiary" on her speech and putting her position on the extreme left of a tiny number of radicals. The best comment I've seen on this string contrasts the 25 who heard her in Durham (if that is an accurate number) telling "the truth" in her speech (as she always does) with the hundreds of thousands who heard Obama tell lies that day in Berlin. I've been part of such a "pitiful" crowd for a McKinney speech (in Miami)and I didn't feel so weird or different for attending. I heard her say that the Green Party was getting her "on the cheap" for a projected budget of $100k (that's THOUSANDs folks)and her campaign simply doesn't have the PR funds to turn out huge crowds as does the Obama campaign with its mega-millions. Please think of that $600 collected in Durham the way you think of the "pennies" that kids send to some worthy cause and maybe you can see these pittances as the "widow's mite" that well could launch an unstoppable campaign for the people to reclaim their country from the corporations.
Those who want to call Cynthia a spoiler and her speech incendiary are not looking deeply enough into any of the issues or events of our time. Cynthia has the integrity to speak the truth regardless of what it means to her career in this culture. I think she represents the only real change in direction we've seen on the political stage for decades, a real challenge to business as usual, but she also is representing a growing movement of truth seekers who are no longer willing to go along to get along because they know the history and they've seen the massive erosion of civil liberties occur with the Democrat's consent. She is not trying to defeat Obama so much as she is trying to expand the Green Party and win some power for the people.
Poet,
I saw Cynthia McKinney on Democracy Now! being interviewed by Amy Goodman and thought she was very articulate and should be taken seriously as a candidate. Your standards and mine are probably different, but without the teleprompter, the coward-in-chief is the most inarticulate person ever to assume the position of the President of the US. I would have preferred a different VP running mate, but she is Cynthia's choice and they'll get my vote. I've had enough of the Democratic Party apologists making excuse after excuse about why they can't do anything to counter the Bush Crime Family...or do they really want to?
Green Party and proud of it!
All of Cynthia McKinney's speech:
http://www.youtube.com/user/GreenProgress
Why don't the Democrats just merge with the Republicans; they love their friends "across the aisle" so much and their bipartisan bliss together. There's very little difference between them anyway. Then people wouldn't be in such a quandary and confused about who to vote for.
First part of Cynthia McKinney's Green Party speech:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=706U5ZN3Mvg
If the Democrats can't win without the small 3rd party vote then it's time to throw in the towel. If they can't convince us to vote for them it's their fault to blunting Republican attacks by becoming just like them.
If you heard Obama speaking in Europe today you'd notice he sounds just like a hawkish Republican. I heard him threatening and saber rattling against Iran, trying to out McCain, McCain.
Votes need to be earned. Votes for Democrats are not some form of entitlement program. Dem supporters please quit the annoying and incessant whining.
rocyahsoul July 25th, 2008 8:11 pm
Nader is going to be a horrific spoiler this year messing up McKinney's chances.
-If the Democrats can't beat George McCain III (who looks old, frail and brain-dead, just waiting to be placed in convalescent home with nothing to offer the nation except wars for the next 100 yrs) then they need to fold their tattered and traitorous little blue tents and just join the Greens.
It is truly mind-boggling that the race is this close with the Republicans being so discredited.
Finally an article about McKinney. CD execs must have realized how fake they look covering a 4 way prez race like there are 2 candidates... Is Ron Paul still in? Perhaps it's a 5 way prez race and I'm mistaken.
Nader is going to be a horrific spoiler this year messing up McKinney's chances.
I did a bit of research a while back that verifies Nader being under the thumb of certain financially powerful entities.
I'm fairly certain McKinney is the ONLY candidate who isn't out for cash and power and protection, but rather running on principle and for morality.
Not like it matters in the least with the vote rigging as extensive as it has become. Plus they could make her disappear and replace her with a plastic surgerized look alike "yes-woman" in a split second if ever the person placed as president entertained disagreement with the financial dominant...
Finally an article about McKinney. CD execs must have realized how fake they look covering a 4 way prez race like there are 2 candidates... Is Ron Paul still in? Perhaps it's a 5 way prez race and I'm mistaken.
Nader is going to be a horrific spoiler this year messing up McKinney's chances.
I did a bit of research a while back that verifies Nader being under the thumb of certain financially powerful entities.
I'm fairly certain McKinney is the ONLY candidate who isn't out for cash and power and protection, but rather running on principle and for morality.
Not like it matters in the least with the vote rigging as extensive as it has become. Plus they could make her disappear and replace her with a plastic surgerized look alike "yes-woman" in a split second if ever the person placed as president entertained disagreement with the financial dominant...
Finally an article about McKinney. CD execs must have realized how fake they look covering a 4 way prez race like there are 2 candidates... Is Ron Paul still in? Perhaps it's a 5 way prez race and I'm mistaken.
Nader is going to be a horrific spoiler this year messing up McKinney's chances.
I did a bit of research a while back that verifies Nader being under the thumb of certain financially powerful entities.
I'm fairly certain McKinney is the ONLY candidate who isn't out for cash and power and protection, but rather running on principle and for morality.
Not like it matters in the least with the vote rigging as extensive as it has become. Plus they could make her disappear and replace her with a plastic surgerized look alike "yes-woman" in a split second if ever the person placed as president entertained disagreement with the financial dominant...
Finally an article about McKinney. CD execs must have realized how fake they look covering a 4 way prez race like there are 2 candidates... Is Ron Paul still in? Perhaps it's a 5 way prez race and I'm mistaken.
Nader is going to be a horrific spoiler this year messing up McKinney's chances.
I did a bit of research a while back that verifies Nader being under the thumb of certain financially powerful entities.
I'm fairly certain McKinney is the ONLY candidate who isn't out for cash and power and protection, but rather running on principle and for morality.
Not like it matters in the least with the vote rigging as extensive as it has become. Plus they could make her disappear and replace her with a plastic surgerized look alike "yes-woman" in a split second if ever the person placed as president entertained disagreement with the financial dominant...
Finally an article about McKinney. CD execs must have realized how fake they look covering a 4 way prez race like there are 2 candidates... Is Ron Paul still in? Perhaps it's a 5 way prez race and I'm mistaken.
Nader is going to be a horrific spoiler this year messing up McKinney's chances.
I did a bit of research a while back that verifies Nader being under the thumb of certain financially powerful entities.
I'm fairly certain McKinney is the ONLY candidate who isn't out for cash and power and protection, but rather running on principle and for morality.
Not like it matters in the least with the vote rigging as extensive as it has become. Plus they could make her disappear and replace her with a plastic surgerized look alike "yes-woman" in a split second if ever the person placed as president entertained disagreement with the financial dominant...
If you want to see Cynthia McKinney at work for the people, watch the documentary AMERICAN BLACKOUT. See it free at http://www.freedocumentaries.org
You can contribute to her Power to the People campaign at www.runcynthiarun.org - every little bit helps (she's not raising a million $$$ a day like Obama)!
Jim,
I hope your are not the same peace activist and folk singer, because your statements would seem absurd coming from that person. Do you support war? Why would you support a war candidate and not a true peace candidate such as Cynthia?
Under Obama, progressives will get what all minorities in the Democratic party get, next to nothing. Progressives, blacks, Hispanics, Native Americans, etc, etc, keep getting the same if not worse. What makes you think Obama will change course?
See above for the ten key Green Values; do you ascribe to them? If you do, how can you support someone that is for more war, more violence?
I do agree with you that there needs to be more unity among progressives, but it is too bad your theory on democracy is regressive, your hopes of peace are regressive, and your candidate ( Obama ) will do little if anything for true change.
J I M _ G L O V E R,
Please do consider the unprecedented possibility of something novel occurring ( because of "blow-back" ):
If even 70% of Americans actually voted in 2008,
the likelihood is that nearly all of those "new" people would be voting for the new 3rd party candidates.
Jim Glover July 25th, 2008 4:27 pm writes "The people united can never be defeated, but the 3rd party myth guarantees that the people will not be united."
-Conclusion: It's better to go with the 2-party myth so we continue getting the same: Democrats and Republicans standing united, hand-in-hand, in bipartisan bliss, screwing the hell out our country and our Constitution.
Vote for Mckinney and Nader too but you won't get them.
Because the corporate masters love the 3rd parties because they prevent progressives of uniting enough to really have more power to change the system for the better.
The people united can never be defeated, but the 3rd party myth guarantees that the people will not be united.
when Nader and Mckinney and the other 3rd parties unite you will see progressives with more power.
Parties are what divides us... if you really want progress vote for the most progressive that has a chance to win.
There is only one party in reality and we can go forward or back... progress or regress.
A third party vote will help McBush and if he wins the Greens and Nader will deserve him.
Under Obama progressives can unite for the future and learn how to support the most progressive.
Third parties are good for education but when it comes to voting, they all help the regressives.
I would hope that McKinney did not blatantly call the Darfur atrocities fake. It doesn't actually state that, anyway. It implies it, but there aren't words in this article that say a fake, blatantly. It's distorted.
I do think that what's happening in Darfur is real. Saddam Hussein was also a tyrant, in my view. So yeah they both need to be ousted. But not by imperial powers who exploit the situation to their own economic advantage.
I don't think I know quite enough about Darfur to say that the U.S. has twisted the facts. I could very well see that though; they seemed to often paint Saddam as a fundamentalist and he wasn't.
a_to_z July 25th, 2008 2:41 am
Thank you for enlightening me!
Watch McKinney for more revelations. She knows more than she's able to say - at the moment.
lillulu said: "I'd vote for McKinney if I thought she had a chance"
By voting for McKinney, she DOES have a chance. Get over the mindset that a so-called '3rd party' candidate can't win... that's what is PREVENTING them from winning. If everyone who said what you said actually voted for her, she just might have a shot at it.
Great post a_to_z! That is solid proof of the abuses that the Capitol police ( and most police ) extol on black people and particularly their crimes against Cynthia McKinney.
It sounds like many are in support of Cynthia, yet many on here seem to slander her obviously not researching or listening to interviews. This makes me curious as to the slanderers motives and/or prejudices. You may not want it pulled, but in many cases you may want to examine whether or not your do not like her because she is black. And her VP choice is Puerto Rican and black. Is that too much for you? If their race is truly not a factor, then watch interviews by McKinney. Watch her speeches...here's one:
http://exposureroom.com/members/cseeman.aspx/assets/49f535df8477457c9c94...
And please listen to the interview about the Capitol police abuse perpetrated on McKinney from a_to_z's post:
http://ia301135.us.archive.org/3/items/CapHill/LastPlantation.mov
And most importantly, look over this list of values:
1. GRASSROOTS DEMOCRACY
2. SOCIAL JUSTICE AND EQUAL OPORTUNITY
3. ECOLOGICAL WISDOM
4. NON-VIOLENCE
5. DECENTRALIZATION
6. COMMUNITY-BASED ECONOMICS AND ECONOMIC JUSTICE
7. FEMINISM AND GENDER EQUITY
8. RESPECT FOR DIVERSITY
9. PERSONAL AND GLOBAL RESPONSIBILITY
10. FUTURE FOCUS AND SUSTAINABILITY
These are the backbone, the ten key values of the the Green Party's Platform, the values of Cynthia McKinney, the values of all true progressives. If you believe in these values, why, why, why would you not support a candidate and equally important, a party that promotes these values?
Progressives, the Green Party needs you now more than ever. A movement is happening, and your help is urgently needed. If you were there in Chicago, you know; if you weren't, believe me, the Green Party will provide the future leadership this country and the world so desperately needs.
BUT, it needs your support. Without the 5% of the populace vote, the Green Party will have to continue to pay for its convention unlike the Democrats or Republicans. That 5% will institutionalize the party, and not only will it get federal funds for their elections, they will be legitimized, they will be on the way to truly compete against the giant political oligopoly of the Democrats and Republicans.
Without that 5%, it will just take longer, but do we have the time? Will we survive another four, eight, twelve years of uncontested political public policy of the Democrats and Republicans?
And if you still believe that you need to vote for Obama so that McCain stays out of office, at the very least, financially support the Green Party. Volunteer, donate time, if you can, donate money. Support that movement that is already moving very fast, is energized, is the future. Support those values that you too believe in. WE are not alone, and WE will make a difference.
Tom Joad, maybe it was a last-minute event that wasn't widely advertised? Perhaps she should start making dumb jokes for entertainment like George Bush does. I know she has a lot of supporters. She's at least paving the way and taking the first steps to break the ridiculous "two" party, two-sides-of-the-same-coin system we now have.
Little Brother and civil behavior:
great posts, thanks.
molly ivins, to illustrate a point, used this story she first heard from john henry faulk:
as children, he and a friend had gone out to the henhouse to gather eggs. when they found themselves suddenly eyeball-to-eyeball with a corn snake, they left in a hurry, not bothering with formalities such as doors or who was to go through them first.
when they reached the kitchen microseconds later, bruised and bleeding, his mom looked at the two for an explanation. when she heard what had happened, she said incredulously "but you know a corn snake can't hurt you."
john henry replied "yes'm, but some things'll scare you so bad you'll hurt yourself."
let's stop voting AGAINST that which we fear (which we seem to get anyway) and start voting FOR that which we value.
"Before an audience of 25"
That says it all. My next door neighbor's yard sale drew a bigger crowd than that.
civil behavior and bonanzaman, excellent posts. If someone like the failed businessman, dry-drunk George Bush can make it to the White House merely because he's a white man with a rich father, an intelligent person like McKinney should be able to also. She's a professor and is not a "hot head" spoiling for a fight. Listen to her speeches and you can tell.
"McKinney earned a B.A. in international relations from the University of Southern California, a Masters of Art in Law and Diplomacy from the Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy. She worked as a high school teacher and later as a university professor."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cynthia_McKinney
Too bad we can't clone her. 535 just like her would make this a much better place
jstevens July 25th, 2008 6:51 am writes A Green Party candidate should have a more impressive list of green accomplishments than Cynthia McKinney.
-she has one important accomplishment that neither of the sold out, pro-corporate, pro-war, military surrounded, Flag lapel pin wearing main stream candiadtes don't: SHE IS ANTIWAR!
Here's what I have to say to all those who think that getting angry is not politically correct. For those who think that Cynthia McKinney isn't polished enough to hold down the job of the President of the US.
1) If George wanker Bush can be president then the bar has been set extremely low. There aren't many qualifications other than being able to speak broken English and laughing and making a joke about everything that now are needed to hold the office.
2) Secondly but more importantly I suggest those who are not angry, in fact, if they are not fuming and ready to set the world on fire aren't informed enough yet. Go back and watch the movie Network. If ever there was a movie that portended what has happened and where we should be it is that movie. There should be a deafening roar in this country. Instead we barely hear a peep. We are all too damn worried about what the boss is going to say about our behavior.
We have lost the ability to expose ourselves to risk, i.e:the hazard or chance of loss. We have become too inured with our sense of living the fat and happy life. We refuse to stick our neck out.
We need MORE Cynthia Mckinneys. And I think maybe WOrds are Important at 2:35am said what I needed to hear. It is "having the Green Party get the 5% would be the best use of my vote, and one that I can believe in." regardless that I am not wooed by ROsa Clemente as VP I believe in everything that Cynthai McKinnney stands for and maybe as the progressive I call myself that is where I need to be. \
Besides I was not as knowledgable about the details of the Capitol incident until now thanks to a-to-z's post at 2:41am but I knew damn well we were not getting the full story form the MSM.
Whether or not she can win is no longer the point. ANd if in fact it gives McCain a win then maybe, just maybe we need to have that happen because if the majority of people in this US are as stupid and uniformed as I think they are, you know it's not going to make much of a difference to them.
I am tucking in my wings and hoping that someone buys this great piece of property I have down here in Florida. Close in to everything, pool, rental income from a cottage on it and lots of fruit trees. I want out. We've wanted out for at least the past two years. Anyone ready to get out of the winter cold and fuel bills you're going to be seeing?? Anyone?
What About Wounded Knee?
Obama's tribute at the holocaust memorial in Israel -- Excerpt: "These events are always loaded with the kind of phoniness that politicians love. Bush even wept he was so caught up in his own fake sincerity. But it's all politics and no one in Israel is really fooled by the performance. If Obama has such deep feelings about genocide he doesn't have to go eight thousand miles to prove it. He could just hop a short flight to Wounded Knee in South Dakota where the 7th Cavalry massacred over 300 Lakota Sioux men, women and children in cold blood. Then he could propose something really original, like declaring that he'll make December 29 (the anniversary of Wounded Knee) a national holiday; a fitting tribute to the over 10 million American Indians who were slaughtered by the invading northern Europeans. But Obama won't support a national holiday for America's native people any more than he'll support a memorial to the victims of slavery. After all, that might alienate the pudgy, middle-aged white guys he's trying to win over for the November balloting." --- by Mike Whitney
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article20352.htm
And don't forget that Reverend Lennox Yearwood, president of the Hip Hop Caucus, was also attacked and manhandled by the Capitol's Finest for the crime of Standing in Line to Attend a Public Hearing While Black.
But I have to give the corporate media credit for their effective smear of then-Congresswoman McKinney; it even fooled me for a while. Until I finally saw her being interviewed only a few months ago-- on "Democracy Now", I think-- I bought into the impression that her heart might be in the right place, but she was a little too wild & crazy for prime time.
It only took about a minute and a half of watching that interview for that implanted caricature to crumble and blow away; she is, in fact, intelligent, articulate, well-informed, and passionate.
So I re-learned a lesson.
It's tragically insidious that Amerikans are generally conditioned, or programmed, to write off public figures because of superficial reports, sound-bites, and video clips of supposedly outrageous or unconventional behavior. I'm not particularly enthusiastic about Howard Dean, for instance, but the "Dean Scream" is a perfect example of what I'm talking about.
When people promptly and firmly reject or dismiss politicians deemed too wacky, I conclude that they've been suckered into the ludicrous assumption that the seemingly "serious", well-behaved, buttoned-down politicians warming chairs in Congress and the Executive branch are responsible adults and appropriate "role models" .
One would think that eventually, the lenghtening list of wide-stanced public sex trollers, diaper-fetish johns, and influence-peddling bribe-takers in and out of office-- all well-groomed, soft-spoken, and conservatively dressed (on the outside, at least) in their white shirts and ties would constitute a Major Clue that it's unwise to judge by narrow-minded, superficial appearances and standards of behavior.
I am trying to decide something about voting. Some people assert that voting in the US in about strategy and gaming the system, that is, voting for the least worst candidate who has any chance of winning. Others feel that the only moral choice is to vote one's values.
ALthough I agree with the majority of her stated political stands, I don't like or trust Cynthia McK. She strikes me as arrogant and entitled, verging on out of control at times, lacking in judgement. That said, I might vote for her because so many of her formally stated positions reflect my values. Ironically, I wouldn't vote for her if I thought she could actually win because I don't think she is temperamentally suited for the job.
25 people and $600 dollars.
If you want to run for President you shouldn't punch a security guard after failing to wear your proper identification and then cry racism.
A Green Party candidate should have a more impressive list of green accomplishments than Cynthia McKinney.
Let's set the record straight, shall we?
20 facts about the Capitol Police incident of March '06:
1. McKinney did not hit/slap or otherwise offend anyone.
2. She was grabbed from behind, and in the process of being grabbed may have inadvertently made contact with the officer's chest with her "closed fist". The media went wild with claims that she "stabbed" McKenna with her cell phone, "punched" him, etc. The officer's report said simply that her closed fist made contact with his chest. The media reports therefore amount to libel.
3. Had she actually hit the officer, she would have been cuffed and dragged off on the spot; that's protocol. As it was, Officer McKenna waited two days before pressing any charges.
4. McKinney was not the only black Member of Congress that the white officers had a hard time recognizing.
5. This was at least the dozenth time it had happened to her, and each time the Capitol Police came to her office later to apologize.
6. They came to her office that day to apologize, but not with Officer McKenna.
7. The General Counsel, John Caulfield, is the man charged with advising officers whether to bring any charge forward or not.
8. 6 months prior Caulfield had been accused of using the n word against a taxi driver; Black officers on the force launched a call for disciplinary action, which was ignored. McKinney was the only Member of Congress to call for his resignation (can you say payback?)
9. The Congressional Black Congress hung her out to dry and pressured her to apologize for something she had not done.
10. Her carefully worded apology on the House Floor came at a moment when the whole affair was getting huge ratings on the major networks and she needed to put an end to it. It was probably the wrong thing to, but the whole thing did calm down the media frenzy.
11. Her apology stated that "there should have been no physical contact in this incident," a reference to the fact that she was grabbed from behind.
12. The outgoing Chief of Police confirmed on television that she was grabbed from behind.
13. The Hill newspaper did a survey and found that only about 50% of Members regularly wear their pin.
14. The charge went before a grand jury, which interviewed several eyewitnesses (the incident was not caught on camera, only her passing by the metal detector was). The grand jury issued a verdict of "ignoramus" meaning the whole thing should be ignored.
15. The mainstream media never report the fact that she was exonerated, and to this day it is the one thing they are sure to mention about her, as they got what they wanted with her apology, which they took as proof of her guilt. This gave them something to hold over the head of a black female congresswoman who had DARED to challenge shared two party doctrine on such hot button issues as 9/11, Colombia, racial profiling, the treatment of Hurricane Katrina Survivors, US contractors involved in child sex trafficking in the Congo, voter machines and Bush's stealing the 2000 and 2004 elections, etc.
16. McKinney never admitted to any wrongdoing in the affair because she had done nothing wrong.
17. Racial profiling is a serious issue in this country and does in fact happen to black members of Congress entering the House Office Buildings, not just McKinney. As a black woman, the incident put her in a double bind, since mentioning racial profiling was what started the firestorm, but NOT mentioning the racial profiling aspect would be a betrayal of her values and commitment to challenge racial profiling wherever it happens (even if ordinary black women get it far worse). Again, this had happened to her over a dozen times.
18. McKinney's office was bombarded with hate calls after the event, probably orchestrated by a right-wing hate group. And one online radio host, Hal Turner, proposed lynching McKinney on his website. Turner is a close associate of Sean Hannity and Neal Boortz (who said this Member of Congress looked like a "ghetto slut" and got away with it, unlike Imus, whose views at the time of his "nappy" comment were turning against the war in Iraq). No Member of Congress came to McKinney's defense over the hate messages.
19. Another incident reported around the same time took place in the House Gallery when Bush was giving a speech in the House. Cindy Sheehan was removed for wearing a T-shirt with an anti-war slogan on it. A black female police officer approached a white woman whom she thought was also wearing an anti-war T-shirt, but it happened to be the wife of a Congressman and the shirt was not anti-war. The white woman took off her shoe and waved it at black female officer, shouting "Come on, bitch." She was not removed from the gallery, nor were any charges pressed.
20. Several black members of the Capitol Police force did come forward anonymously to defend McKinney and talked about the intense racism they face on the Capitol Police force, see: http://ia301135.us.archive.org/3/items/CapHill/LastPlantation.mov
Maybe this is the year to challenge the status quo. To vote Green party, have them get 5% of the vote. They mainstream media has always been claiming the imaginary definition that a 'real' party is one that gets at least 5% of the vote.
It you truly believe in the power of your vote, let's just agree that this is the year that we put it to the test.
Vote Green.
Hell, I am a Nader supporter but I think that this year I will vote Green because I think that having the Green Party get the 5% would be the best use of my vote, and one that I can believe in.
I will be voting Green Party this year, as long as Cynthia McKinney maintains her current positions and approach.
Consider committing to voting Green.
greenerthanthou July 25th, 2008 1:27 am
Then Doom and Gloom just announces that Cynthia doesn't address the Native American genocide. Really?
Did Doom and Gloom hear Obama addressing the Native American genocide? Why not?
Has he heard Obama speak about institutionalized racism? Why not?
How about bloated military budgets? Why not?
What about impeachment? Why not?
How about really ending the war in Iraq? Why not?
What about ending the occupation in Afghanistan? WHY NOT? WHY NOT? WHY THE HELL NOT?
And, as for reparations, we should start with the dispossessed people of New Orleans. 40 acres and a mule for all, instead of FEMA trailers behind barbed wire.
"Badges! Badges!! We don't need no stinking badges!!" (Treasure of the Sierra Madre)
Why do Democrats quote Republican slander when talking about Cynthia McKinney, instead of focusing on her politics? Oh, because her politics are so much better than Republican lite, Obama.
Then Doom and Gloom just announces that Cynthia doesn't address the Native American genocide. Really? What does he base this on? Nothing. Look at her acceptance speech
"We would have apologized for genocide of indigenous peoples of this land".
Why don't you research, Doom and Gloom, before denouncing in ignorance?
And this security guard assault on Cynthia being twisted is totally outrageous. Personally, I resist everytime an officious asshole in a uniform demands my papers. But I am crabbier than Cynthia. That security guard was put up to hassling her by the Republicans. He invaded her personal space. There weren't many black Congress women, but his excuse was that he didn't recognize her? Bullshit. Any Democrat that uses that slander is as despicable as a Republican.
And as for Darfur, I interpret her remarks as pointing out that no one can deny there are massacres, so it is hard to argue against a US invasion to "protect" the people of Sudan. But, of course, the US is not interested in dead Africans, or the much greater slaughter in the Congo would be of great concern. But the US has access to the riches of the Congo, so dead Africans are ignored. The oil of the Sudan, on the other hand, is slipping out of our hands, so, all of a sudden, we're quite concerned about genocide. Bullshit!
I'm glad that Common Dreams finally printed an article about Cynthia McKinney. But this article was kind of a hatchet job. Why didn't they print her acceptance speech?
I saw Cynthia and Rosa on C-SPAN the other evening, they were great. We should be bringing up similar issues ourselves on talk radio, and in letters to editors, and so forth.
Good luck with your campaign, John.
I'm going to make a donation. And I'll also be sending you some progressive DVDs that you might find useful as outreach tools.
Kind Regards,
Preston
For those who didn't notice his post, here is the website for the Green candidate running for state office in Mississippi -
http://www.VoteJohnWages.com
Too bad we have no-one of this caliber, with her mettle, with her courage and conviction to call out 'Mini Me' Harper in Canada...
McKinney's right about Obama's pathetic stance on Afghanistan.
Afghanistan is a disaster and Obama is about to make it worse, far worse.
He comes from the same frame of mind as McCain. Anybody who expects change from Obama is either swept up in emotional reactions to a pretty man or is in denial.
lillulu July 24th, 2008 10:02 pm lobster, I don't believe McKinney is "spoiling for a fight."
-It is amazing but the line about McKinney being an out of control freak tussling with guards is actually a common smear used by Republicans.
Todays Democrats are basically slightly left of center Republicans. That's how far to the right the entire political spectrum has shifted.
The really puzzling thing is that us "leftists" get called Republican shills, fools, Republican troll etc when we point out that Democrats are selling out. When you stump them by asking them to explain why Obama votes to fund war and capitulated on FISA they become irate and insult you. You figure.
For me Cynthia is the ONLY logical vote. Why?
Democrats or Republicans offer little difference. Democrats have gone for everything Bush has asked. Their main difference is better packaging.
Cynthia questions the official 911 MYTH.
We NEED other parties.
McKinney and Nader are good people, with good values, but are lousy politicians.
McKinney needs to focus. Spinning off into strange 911 conspiracies and arguments for slavery reparations is not what she should be doing right now.
Nader just seems to be floating around without a real direction or purpose.
Don't get me wrong, I won't support ObaMcCain.
But I wish we had a better movement with better candidates. Over the years of the Bush presidency we could have been building that movement, if not for all the people who foolishly thought the dems would be our saviors.
#
lillulu July 24th, 2008 10:02 pm
lobster, I don't believe McKinney is "spoiling for a fight." Didn't the security guard put his hands on her, and wasn't he familiar with all of the members of Congress already? That was uncalled for. He had to have been rude to evoke such a response from her. He was a Caucasian and from what I've heard was a racist Republican plant instructed to provoke her. I don't put anything past them and their dirty tricks.
================================================================
If the American people fall for such tricks then they deserve the government they get. We must be more active and we must educate ourselves more.
lobster, I don't believe McKinney is "spoiling for a fight." Didn't the security guard put his hands on her, and wasn't he familiar with all of the members of Congress already? That was uncalled for. He had to have been rude to evoke such a response from her. He was a Caucasian and from what I've heard was a racist Republican plant instructed to provoke her. I don't put anything past them and their dirty tricks.
more ...
"Had the Green Party's values been reflected in public policy since the
beginnings of the Green Party in this country, the United States would have
long ago implemented a livable wage;
there would be no civil liberties erosion;
diversity would be respected, appreciated and welcomed;
education would be interesting and relevant to students' lives and no student would
graduate from college $100,000 in debt in a Green Party USA because
education, not incarceration and militarization, would be subsidized by the
state.
In a Green Party USA, health care would be provided for everyone
here through a single payer, Medicare-for-all type health care system.
We would have no homeless men and women sleeping on our streets and everyone
who could work would have work.
Rebuilding our infrastructure, manufacturing green technology, retooling our economy so that those who
protect us, train us, heal us and prepare us for tomorrow are compensated in
what is their true value to our culture and our society, based on their
contribution to our civilization.
Vietnam War-era veterans would be our last war veterans because we would never have been engaged in war and occupation against Afghanistan and Iraq.
We would forego imperial designs on our neighbors to the north and south, never building any wall of
division, not ever encroaching on their geographic or cultural sovereignty.
In fact, if Green Party values were now reflected in U.S. public policy, our
country not only would not be engaged in war and occupation, there would be
peace in the Middle East based on self-determination, respect for human
rights, and justice.
We would strive to perfect our democracy at home through election integrity and no one would be denied their rightful place in our Union due to discrimination.
Our neighbors in the global community would look up to us for our cultural and technological accomplishments.
We would have apologized for genocide against the indigenous peoples of this
land and the abomination of chattel slavery.
Our country would have dignity on the world stage and in every international forum, and no one in this country would be made to live in fear."
–Cynthia McKinney, speech accepting the Green Party nomination.
http://yourblackpolitics.blogspot.com/2008/07/cynthia-mckinney-acceptanc...
"But we make history today only because we must. In 2008, after two stolen
Presidential elections and eight years of George W. Bush, and at least two
years of Democratic Party complicity, the racket is about war crimes,
torture, crimes against the peace; the racket is about crimes against the
Constitution, crimes against the American people, and crimes against the
global community. The racket is even about values that we thought were long
settled as reasonable to pursue, like liberty and justice, and economic
opportunity, for all. Yes, Sojourner, there's a lot out of kilter now, but
these two women, Rosa and me, joined by all the men and women in this room,
are going to do our best to turn this country right side up again."
--Cynthia McKinney, speech accepting the Green Party nomination.
http://yourblackpolitics.blogspot.com/2008/07/cynthia-mckinney-acceptanc...
Also, note carefully how the Democrats always sneeringly refer to us as 'you left wingers'. Brings back memories of Rep. Obey's sneer about 'idiot liberals'. Or Speaker Pelosi's whine that she couldn't have some of us arrested for loitering when they tried to protest near her in favor of impeachment.
Listen to what the Democrats say, and realize that they are telling you that you have no place in their party.
They want your vote to elect their pro-war, pro-corporate, very-very-slightly-less-evil-than-the-Republican candidates But they clearly tell you that they hate you, they hate your polices, and that they hate what you believe in. So, why vote for them?
sl63 July 24th, 2008 12:58 pm,
Short, but excellent post, sl63. After articles I've read by Keith Harmon Snow and others who've had articles posted at www.globalresearch.ca over the past year or more, I wholly agree and believe that the situation in Darfur is being fiendishly and deceptively exploited for ... OIL. Not only in Darfur, for, f.e., the situation in the Congo is and has long been exploited for mineral or mining resources, while the msm "news" media is where? As usual, it's NOT conducting real journalism; it's performing yellow journalism, "feeding" readers and listeners or viewers with lies, constant propaganda of lies.
After all, that is [the way] of the imperialists, corporatists, etcetera. The U.S. State Dept, USAID, NED, etcetera, all play their fiendish roles, and European govts and the UNSC, as well as now the ICC, International Criminal Court of criminal judges, all play their contributing roles too.
It's a maccabre but hilarious joke that the ICC has recently indicted the President of Sudan. When reading the ICC's claims about the number of Darfurians or Sudanese killed since 2003 and the number forced to become refugees in real plight, it's a hellishly sick joke when compared to what the U.S. is guilty of in Iraq since 2003, and that's Iraq alone, besides Haiti, Afghanistan, Kosovo, and more; all while the ICC says NOTHING about the real and incontestably true crimes of the U.S. govt and its ruling elites, and their fiend allies of Europe, etcetera.
The ICC clearly [murdered] former Yugoslavian President Slobodan Milosevic; not requiring a genius to be able to SEE this is irrefutably true. Now the ICC makes it again and all the more obvious that it's only an instrument of the ruling elites of the Western powers with its bogus judgement against the President of Sudan.
There are articles about the [real] situation in Sudan and its Darfurian region at www.globalresearch.ca, very good articles; but the following is another very important article and with respect to what's [really] going on in Somalia.
"Bush's Rampage in Somalia",
by Mike Whitney, Jul 17 2008
http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=9608
Remember that the short-lived but apparently serious violence in Tibet around March 14-17 happened right when the 'Winter Soldiers' event of many U.S. military veterans of the war on Iraq, and maybe also the war on Afghanistan, was being held, around March 14-16; and the former got a LOT of "news" media coverage, while the U.S. soldiers received awfully LITTLE?! The "news" media definitely knew about the 'Winter Soldiers' event, one of the most important events in U.S. history, if not world history; therefore, they [deliberately] did NOT report on it and, instead, chose to try to cover it up with the likely U.S.-sponsored or orchestrated violence in Tibet! It's perhaps and hopefully not the analytical, but is the operative CIA, NED, State Dept, ... way!
'WAR IS A RACKET', former USMC Major General Smedley Butler. And do we have an awful lot of concrete contemporary examples to draw from or refer to.
Not quite related, not specifically anyway, but still a complementary, very, reading is the following article.
"The abuses of the Federal Reserve System:
Louis T. McFadden (1876-1936): An American Hero",
by Richard C. Cook, Jul 22 2008,
http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=9642
That article definitely fits when considering what Major General Butler wrote about, except this time it's about that kind of war by American bankers against the whole country of the USA. It did not involve military aggression against the U.S. by U.S. elites and criminally complicit govt officials, but still was WAR ON THE USA and had repercussions that reached abroad.
====================================
Ariel_Sharon July 24th, 2008 12:52 pm,
Ariel Sharon is a SCHMUCK WAR CRIMINAL, and extreme criminal against human rights, including of Israeli Jewish citizens who are conscripted into IDF service whether they like it or not.
So Ariel_Sharon is another SCHMUCK CRIMINAL who promotes LIES, deceptive propaganda, crimes against humanity, ... etcetera.
There is NO genocide in Darfur. Real analysts have explained this, including that the killings are not committed by the govt of Sudan. Some killings may indeed be committed by the Sudanese govt, but NOT most. The U.S. was the sole govt to claim that there was genocide there; no others saying this! The situation is bad, but Iraq and Afghanistan are worse and irrefutably because of the criminal, rogue, ... U.S. govt. Etcetera.
There are excellent articles at Global Research for this, among other topics.
Ariel_Sharon thinks he's such a genius that he can fool people who've read an adequate amount, and it doesn't take much; especially when we also possess and exercise real common sense and observational abilities. Ariel_Sharon's schmuck charlatan kind may still succeed in fooling people who are irresponsibly ignorant, but that's their irresponsibility.
I have no frigging idea why Kucinich is still a Democrat.
Remember the leadership of the Democratic Party just backed, funded and supported an attempt to kick him out of Congress in the primaries. Which by the way is exactly what they did to McKinney as well. So its pretty dang funny to see the Democrats citing Kucinich as a good thing representing the party when the leadership of the party was just working hard to kick him out of Congress. And this is the same party that tries hard to kick him out of debates, only lets him speak to the convention in the afternoon when no one is watching, and which has generally opposed everything he's ever tried to do (like impeachment that is blocked mainly by the Democratic leadership).
I guess if you like being useless and ineffective and constantly being blocked and opposed and blocked from being heard by your own party, that's a good reason for progressives to remain Democrats.
civil behavior July 24th, 2008 9:12 pm
I love Cynthia McKinney. She is one bright woman with more balls than most men. Not to mention how easily she articulates the real reasons and needed solutions for making sense of this disaster.
Problem for me is Rosa Clemente. Had she chosen someone else I might have voted for her. As it is I will be hard pressed.
I also say that her choice of a running mate is a disappointment. I am thinking she is in this to get some points out to the American public for the 2012 vote. She desires for us to take more of an active part in our government( I am guessing. She was my rep at one point in time).
However, in my heart of hearts I can not vote for Obama and since McCain has sold out to the Bush Crew I can not vote for him either.
I wish Cynthia would choose another running mate if possible.
Whereever you are, please support and vote for Ms.McKinney.
If you vote for Obama, you are just voting for more of the same. New face, new spin, maybe a few new ways of selling the same crap, but make no mistake that its exactly the same crap as you'd get from McCain and the Republicans.
If you doubt that, then name the major changes in America that we've seen since the Democrats took control of Congress. For instance, did the war in Iraq end? Or, for that matter, what major initiatives that would have made major changes have been vetoed by Bush? Can't think of any.
Of course, then you can go back and review all the things that Bush has done that the Democrats either overwhelmingly supported (Pentagon budgets, Patriot Act both come to mind instantly), or that they refused to use their power of the filibuster to block (SC Justices Alito and Roberts come to mind, along with dang near everything else that Bush has done that a filibuster could have stopped).
Or, you can go back to the Clinton years and remember how the Democrats then sold out to the corporate interests that were giving them money. Just one for instance, remember that both the Telecom reform that allowed the creation of Clear Channel and the banking 'reform' that created today's mortgage mess and economic crisis were both supported by the Democratic leadership and happily signed into law by Clinton (Clinton's speech the day he signed the banking reform law is online and classic reading now that we see the mess that its made).
So, why on earth would anyone gladly vote for even more of this by supporting Obama and more Democrats? What we need to do is to kick their rears completely out of Congress and the White House.
Or, do you look forward to four more years of having the Democrats screw you on every major bill and policy?
25 people showed up for mcKinney and she collected 600$? And then 200,000 in Berlin listen to Obama??
:-D
This is funny stuff.
I must admit www.CommonDreams.org/nutjobs is now a hilarious joke and just makes me laugh.
Hey Greens, McKinney lost her seat Congressional (twice) in part due to her nutty beliefs in 9-11 conpsiracy theories, support of South American leftists like Chavez, and allegations of antisemitism by her followers. Google the controversial quote that he father made on Georgia TV.
NancyH said "Vote Green or vote Nader"
Well lefties, ya gonna pick one of these two or not? Last time I checked a citizen can only vote once for a president. Which one? Come on. Pick. It's Mckinney or Nader and not "either"
I noticed pro-Kucinich statements on these posts again. He is officially a DEMOCRAT. You greens/lefties do not support Democrats, right? A purist must be pure 100% of the time. Otherwise it's hypocrisy. If you left wingers vocally make purist statements against Democrats, well then live by them. Period. Got it?
Cynthia not articulate? I need to review for it has been many years since I have heard her speak but my memory is one of her being very articulate. She does not speak the Queen's english yet she does speak truth to the people. She encourages people to read and to think.
Although she has not address some issues off the bat (i.e. Native American and global warming), I know she is not against either. She desires all to be able to have the opportunity to pursue happiness. Should either group approach her they would have a champion if she is not already championing such issues.
I for one do not think this country has enough money to correct what has been done to the black community. I have hope that God will provide for me and mine. The ills done to blacks can not be corrected by money or feeble apologies. It is the ill that only the black community can correct by living up to its highest good. I look forward to that day.
Democrats only care about winning and election. There's no issue, no principle that they wouldn't sell out to do it. So, the bottom line is that they could generally care less about a military parent who's lost a child. The only thing in a Democrat's mind is whether killing more children will favor or hurt their chances in the next election.
There were about 3000 dead American soldiers from Iraq (by the Pentagon's generally low numbers), when the Democrats took control of Congress. What are we at now, well over 4000, right? The difference is the number of Americans the Democrats were willing to kill in order to win the next election.
And of course, the one thing they have to do is to come out and try to trash any people who are listening to people like Cynthia McKinney. That's what scares them the most. The fact that someday people might figure out that they have different choices other than their pro-war, pro-corporate rule, pro-spy on Americans police state and generally lying candidates is what scares them the most. Because the day people figure that out, that's the end of their corporate money gravy train.
I love Cynthia McKinney. She is one bright woman with more balls than most men. Not to mention how easily she articulates the real reasons and needed solutions for making sense of this disaster.
Problem for me is Rosa Clemente. Had she chosen someone else I might have voted for her. As it is I will be hard pressed.
Part of that decision might be who Obama chooses for his VP. If he goes center right then I'll vote for McKinney regardless.
Personally I like his speeches but not his stance on issues particularly the continued warmongering. I am definitely out to dismantle the military and he isn't aspiring to do any such thing.
Actually I think it is a tough choice. If it was at all possible I think Mike Gravel stole my heart a long time ago. Now that is one man who is wiling to tell it like it is. All the posturing from the rest of them is garbage. But then again, the show must go on eh?
I saw Cynbthia on Democracy Now wher she was ibnterviewed at length by Amy Goodman. Cynthia is good people, her heart is in the right place on so many issues, but she is not even articulate enough to be taken seriously as a protest or fringe candidate.
That said, I just may write her in on my November ballot in the hopes that it helps the Greens get federal matching funds for future elections and to simplify ballot access for the party throughout the country.
Once more I say how good is security if they do not recognize the people whom they are suppose to be protecting? She is not spoiling for a fight but she will not roll over if a fight is brought to her. Keep in mind we are the nation that is in Iraq on a pre-emptive basis.
wc652 July 24th, 2008 6:01 pm
No doubt the anti-Obama tirades will continue on a daily basis in some of these postings, if that floats your boat. I second tailcap's motion on these, 7/22, at 7:08, "Among Iraqis…," "… you just don't read them."
This is the post wc652 referred to:
tailcap July 22nd, 2008 7:08 pm
wc652 July 22nd, 2008 6:17 pm writes "Are these daily anti-Obama tirades tiresome to anyone else?"
-It doesn't take a rocket scientist to figure this out: you just don't read them.
It would seem like a tedious tirade to Democratic Party supporters unless you had lost a love one in a war based on lies that will continue no matter who becomes president.
In the latter case it would be justifiably exposing the warmongers and lifting the fog of deception that clouds around the Democratic "antiwar" candidate.
I am glad to see that the Obama supporters that are sick and tired of us complaining about Obama's support for war and his now famous FISA capitulation have figured out that the best thing to do is simply not read our posts. Well done.
Another option would be to go to any one of a number of pro-Democratic web sites where criticisms of Obama are not allowed and I am sure you will be very happy there.
Apparently, the warmongering and capitulating to right-wing, anti-democratic, Republican positions doesn't make you sick and tired, it's just the complaining about it you can't stand.
Cynthia McKinney Green Party Acceptance Speech
http://exposureroom.com/members/cseeman.aspx/assets/49f535df8477457c9c94...
Ms. McKinney was targeted by AIPAC many years ago and eventually lost her Congressional district in Georgia as a result of such targeting. The msm has consistently since then characterized her views and persona as weird.
She should be commended for continuing to stand for her principles and commitments to basic tenets in America.
Support and help Cynthia McKinney's campaign, but vote strategically. We need courageous truth tellers like McKinney and to build truly progressive and independent organizations such as the Green Party. We need to get genuine progressive voices into the public debate around the election as much as possible.
If you're in a state that will clearly vote for one of the two corporate parties, cast your protest vote with pride. That includes about 80 percent of the states (i.e. California where I live will clearly be won by Obama). If you're in a state that figures to be close, I urge you to vote to insure McCain's defeat.
Run, Cynthia run!
I have yet to hear McKinney address global climate change. To use racist guilt-mongering as the focal point of her campaign is to avoid the fact that global climate change affects ALL ON EARTH, and not much else will matter when it grows serious legs. Like the all-night tropical thunder storm with continuous lightening and thunder up here on the North Coast of Maine last night.
Virtually unheard of - more to come, especially if we don't stop burning fossil fuels. where is any of that in her talks?
I'm supporting Nader - he's the only honest, independent person running who understand it all, and who rails continuously about corporate control of Earth's resources. Who else does that?
McKinney is really Black, really a woman and really progressive. McKinney has been demanding answers and speaking truths others were afraid to utter for years and has paid the price. She is no corporate opportunist. She represents authentic change but half-assed liberals will always condemn any alternative from those chosen by the ruling class and then quietly ring thier hands when "their" candidate turns on them and does just what the Repugs would do.
If you can't support a good alternative then there won't ever be one.
Give it a rest titti, and go peddle your apocolyptic, religious mumbo-jumbo to some one who believes the myths and gives a rat's ass.
MikeLooneyBinSC please learn about the Antichrist, both Obama and Bush fit the description perfectly, your defense of Obama makes me believe you might be a recovering Dem kool aid drinker, or a devoted Apocalyptist?
Everyone knows that Obama is a typical Democrat, speaking beautifully for the antiwar crowd, while stabbing them in the back by funding Bush's wars and promising to escalate one of them when president. He's a half-black, half-witted copy of Bill Clinton, who killed more civilians overseas than even W, and committed many other atrocities against the working poor in America.
What can you say about Ariel_Sharon that already hasn't been said about Paris Hilton.
Oh, for heaven's sake! This is a lady who's spoiling for a fight. Remember her confrontation with the security guard at the Capitol when he asked to see her badge?
The MOST important aspect of the Green Party is that it is not a nationalistic party -- it is an international party.
This will be very important in the future, when regionalism trumps nationalism and we will need a party which is inclusive of diverse regions. . . for example, Alaska (except for the Alaskan panhandle) is really part of the region called the Circumpolar North more than it is part of the United States . . .
Washington DC is finally getting so unwieldy that we may see some sort of regional 'provinces' emerge, some-what like in Canada . . . people are tired of endlessly feeding the Beast. . . and the Beast may even be tired of needing to feed . . .
the concepts the Green Party stands for can spread like mushroom mycelium, underground, unnoticed, until all at once the rain falls and the sun comes out and there are suddenly mushrooms everywhere . . . that to me is why it is so important to support the Green Party, and why i am voting for Cynthia McKinney . . .
You go, girl.
my candidate - at last.
The US could atone for some of its sins through reparations for slavery
That lady deserves your vote more than Obama, but vote Obama anyway.
I don't masturbate anymore (unable, not unwilling) but if memory serves I never did it because I was angry.
Scientists say the most abundant element is hydrogen. I think it is stupidity.
It's high time we all worked to build up The Green Party.
The two-party corporate clusterf*ck has been a disaster for America, and we need a party that actually represents the needs of We The People. Democrats just drive the getaway car for Republican criminals.
Cynthia M