Who's Paying for the Conventions?
The election season is heating up, with back-to-back conventions approaching -- the Democrats in Denver followed by the Republicans in St. Paul, Minn. The conventions have become elaborate, expensive marketing events, where the party's "presumptive" nominee has a coronation with much fanfare, confetti and wall-to-wall media coverage. What people don't know is the extent to which major corporations fund the conventions, pouring tens of millions of dollars into a little-known loophole in the campaign-finance system.
Stephen Weissman of the nonpartisan Campaign Finance Institute explains the unconventional funding:
"It's totally prohibited to give unlimited contributions to political parties. It's totally prohibited for a corporation or a union to just go right into its treasury and give money to political parties. Yet, under an exemption that was created by the Federal Election Commission, which essentially is made up of representatives of the two major parties, all of this money can be given if it's given through a host committee under the pretense that it's merely to promote the convention city."
According to CFI's new report, "Analysis of Convention Donors," since the last presidential election, the corporations funding the conventions have spent more than $1.1 billion lobbying the federal government. Add to it the millions they pour into the conventions. Says Weissman: "In return for this money, the parties, through the host committees, offer access to top politicians, to the president, the future president, vice president, cabinet officials, senators, congressmen. They promise these companies who are giving that they will be able to not only get close to these people by hosting receptions, by access to VIP areas, but they'll actually have meetings with them."
Disclosure of what corporations are giving is not required until 60 days after each convention, which is essentially Election Day, so there is no time to challenge a candidate on particular corporate donors. Weissman reports that most of the corporations that are giving to the convention "host committees" also have serious business before the federal government. Take AT&T, for example. Glenn Greenwald of Salon.com recently pointed out that the Democratic conventioneers and registered media in attendance will receive a tote bag prominently emblazoned with the AT&T logo. It's a perfect metaphor for a much larger gift, the one Democrats and Republicans just gave AT&T and other telecoms: retroactive immunity for spying on U.S. citizens. While Sens. Russ Feingold and Chris Dodd fought the bill, Sen. Barack Obama, until recently a staunch opponent of telecom immunity, reversed his position and supported it, reneging on a pledge to filibuster. Perfect timing.
The conventions are also training grounds for the next generation of elected officials. Many state legislators attend the conventions as delegates, where they marinate in the ways of big-money politics. From the corporate parties to the hospitality suites, they learn that there is nothing to be gained by challenging the status quo.
Obama has sworn off special-interest and lobbying money for his campaign, and he made historic strides in using the Internet to marshal millions of small donors and amass a campaign war chest with $72 million in cash on hand at the end of June. Yet the Denver convention is looking more and more like business as usual. Weissman writes in his report, "Lavish conventions with million-dollar podiums, fancy skyboxes and Broadway production teams are not necessary to the democratic process."
What is necessary, Weissman says, is stripping soft money out of the convention process: "Congress should pass a law that says no more soft money for these conventions, no corporate treasury, union treasury, no unlimited individual money. Instead, the parties -- let's discard this host-committee fiction -- can go out there and ask people to help the convention, but with the same limits where they're asking people to help them normally."
"Deep Throat" is said to have told Bob Woodward during Watergate to "follow the money." It looks as if this summer you need only go to the Democratic and Republican national conventions. It's time to close this loophole.
Amy Goodman is the host of "Democracy Now!," a daily international TV/radio news hour airing on more than 700 stations in North America.
© 2008 Amy Goodman
Twitter
StumbleUpon
Facebook
Delicious
Digg
Newsvine
Google
Yahoo
Technorati
44 Comments so far
Show AllApologize to Nader?
That schmuck should apologize to the Nation for helping to deliver us to the cretin in the oval office and all the bastards appointed and elected with him.
Yet here he goes again- how much does the RNC deliver to his supporters in typically Republican sneaky fashion?
The asshole Ralph has ever since been riding on the fame delivered to him by GM and the Corvair. His view of cars (as per those of his buddies Joan Claybrook and Clarence Ditlow) has been frequently off the road ever since.
My apologies for the last post: I linked to the 2004 Green Party platform. An April 2008 draft, much shorter, linked below, was amended at the July convention and the amended version is apparently not yet on the website. But you definitely get "the idea" of the platform on which Cynthia and Rosa are running:
http://www.gp.org/committees/platform/draft/documents/Chapter-One.pdf
Old Jeffersonian (4:54 PM), good news, THERE IS a party whose national convention has already hammered out a platform that includes most if not all the "planks" you want in that platform, and much more in the same vein beside. It's called the Green Party and its 2008 platform, approved the beginning of this month in Chicago, can be seen at:
http://www.gp.org/platform/2004/
And yes, the presidential and vice-presidential nominees Cynthia McKinney and Rosa Clemente, will stand firmly on that platform which represents GP "values" that weren't created for the occasion of an election but are the everyday modus operandi of the party, as they have been for many years. Please look at this platform (it's very long, so bring a cup of coffee to your computer) and I think when you do, you will as I have done, be willing to invest some money and even more some of your energy in promoting this candidacy. Think of the GP as the "new Jeffersonian" politics, without the imperialism of the "old" version.
Hi KEM !! I have DSL now...
.
http://www.votenader.org/issues/
single payer national health insurance:
Nader: On the table; Obama/McCain: Off the table
Cut the huge, bloated, wasteful military budget:
Nader: On the table; Obama/McCain: Off the table
No to nuclear power, solar energy first:
Nader: On the table; Obama/McCain: Off the table
Aggressive crackdown on corporate crime and corporate welfare:
Nader: On the table; Obama/McCain: Off the table
Open up the Presidential debates:
Nader: On the table; Obama/McCain: Off the table
Adopt a carbon pollution tax:
Nader: On the table; Obama/McCain: Off the table
Reverse U.S. policy in the Middle East:
Nader: On the table; Obama/McCain: Off the table
Impeach Bush/Cheney:
Nader: On the table; Obama/McCain: Off the table
Repeal the Taft-Hartley anti-union law:
Nader: On the table; Obama/McCain: Off the table
Adopt a Wall Street securities speculation tax:
Nader: On the table; Obama/McCain: Off the table
Put an end to ballot access obstructionism:
Nader: On the table; Obama/McCain: Off the table
Work to end corporate personhood:
Nader: On the table; Obama/McCain: Off the table
.
I'm sitting here at a keyboard, but my mind's eye rests upon a pile of old, weathered boards shoved off into a corner. Upon approaching closer, I see that they are the old, neglected planks of the platform of the Democratic Party. When I was a youngster, I used to listen to that platform being built, plank by plank at the Democratic Convention. It was always a long, tough job, but when it was finally built, the candidates, who also helped to build it, could stand on it and see where they were going. The people voting for them could see, too.
Campaigning used to be on issues and problems the nation faced. The candidate with the best solutions was the one that got the votes. Nowadays, it seems that no one is up to facing and solving problems.
"Vote for me, the other guy is no good!"
"What do you plan to do about the economy?"
"The other guy is a crook, vote for me!"
And so on throughout the campaign.
In the last election, I would have liked to see the Democratic Party build a platform, plank by plank, addressing the problems that currently beset our nation and the world today. Sadly enough, name calling seemed to be enough for the Democrats as well as the Republicans.
Perhaps, if We the People were to build a platform to take our country back and restore the honor of the United States, we could take our nation back from the oligarchy which holds it in thrall.
We need a plank reaffirming the rule of law in international relations and re-ratifying the treaties that Bush has unilaterally or through economic and military blackmail abrogated. In that plank should be a re-dedication to the United Nations, created at the end of WW-II to avoid the nightmare that we are once again going through in Iraq and Afghanistan. We need a well thought out plank with a plan for ending these Iraq and Afghan incursions with honor and getting our troops out of there and back home.
We need a plank forbidding the Chief Executive from starting preemptive wars at will with anyone he disagrees with, or just follow the Constitution, which restricts that role to the Congress.
We need a plank to restore a middle class to this country. Our greatest moment in history has been that in which we had a burgeoning middle class which worked, played, fought just wars and willingly payed taxes for what we got from good government. We are devolving into the extremely rich who do none of the above, and the extremely poor who can't do any of the above. We should have a plank addressing the return of the tax giveaways to the rich and powerful, with that money going back to the people through social services, Medicare, and education; services which the Neocons want to do away with through bankrupting the American economy if that is what it takes.
Above all, there must be a plank which promises to return the Constitution and Bill of Rights to the People of the United States, so we can again be a nation respected for honor and decency.
We need a plank which will allow the poor and the elderly to get medications at a reasonable price without rewarding the drug cartels with huge grants of tax money to make up the difference.
There are many more planks to lay to build a strong platform. It used to be that the candidate was chosen after the platform was erected, largely upon his response to the platform. These days, the candidate seems to be selected long before the convention. Then the Democrats get to rubber stamp the choice just like the Republicans do.
We really need a strong third party to act as a truly effective gadfly to the existing parties, but above all, We the People need to build a party platform that reflects the needs of our nation and we need candidates who will stand upon that platform and say, "If I am elected, I pledge my administration to carry out the mandate of this platform on which I stand. And if I fail to do so, I encourage the American people to replace me with someone who can and will."
That person would have my vote and as much of my savings and pension as I could afford, if it would help to get him or her elected.
C A N U C K C H U C K,
When you say "Dumbocracy", I think"Dumb_mockercy" or "De_mockercy"or "Dem_ockercy"
Namaste « Presence »
« We must be the change we wish to see in the world » — Gandhi
« There is a sufficiency in the world for man's need but not for man's greed » — Gandhi
« We adopt the means of nonviolence because our end is a community at peace with itself » — ML King
It all gets back to the lesser of 2 evils doesn't it? dem Dems or doz Repubs. In other words: Will the real corrupt corporate crony please stand up? But whereas 99% of the Repubs are corporate lackies maybe only 40% of the Dems are. Unfortunately the Greens or other parties are not truly relevant in our current 2 party system.
Disclaimer: Above Percentages are totally fictious, but do reflect personal perceptions.
So what to do? Vote as progressive as possible, work to oust the most corporate Dems ....get into local politics so you can influence directions.
Why are they not holding the GOP feet to the fire and say "we have not forgotten the victims of Katrina?"
_______________________________
Because they HAVE forgotten the victims of Katrina?
Just a wild guess.
What I do not understand if the dems. really want to win why did they pick Denver of all places? They should of held it in New Orleans, then at least some of this corrupt soft money pouring in could have gone to provide jobs to people in New Orleans. Why are they not holding the GOP feet to the fire and say "we have not forgotten the victims of Katrina?"
Fakedemocracy..the word is "Dumbocracy"
"Glenn Greenwald of Salon.com recently pointed out that the Democratic conventioneers and registered media in attendance will receive a tote bag prominently emblazoned with the AT&T logo. It's a perfect metaphor for a much larger gift, the one Democrats and Republicans just gave AT&T and other telecoms: retroactive immunity for spying on U.S. citizens"
Glenn didn';t mention that it is stuffed with money, and has a listening devise sewn into the lining.
Another version of switching parties:
Switch to Non-Partisan ASAP and then:
Vote for Obama if you must for president....then vote Green for ALL OTHER offices, independents in Congress or Senate and as "Green as possible" for all your local offices.
That is a concrete start to change in USA.
Another name for a corporate paid for democracy, is fakedemocracy.
It is really laughable for anyone to say, think or believe we live in a democracy. When a person or worse, corporation, can BUY access and influence of elected politicians or candidates there is NO WAY anyone can say our political process isn't corrupted or corruptable. "Da" Nile ain't just a river in Egypt. Vote Nader/Gonzalez '08
Fascist regimes always generates elaborate pomp and circumstance to awe the goggle eyed masses.
Rackets grow not out of logic but greed.
Hi ~Nannie~ And in spite of Obama's claim that he was just a "minor legal aquaintenance" of Tony Rezko, Rezko was Obamas major fund raiser. There most likely will be a lot of revealing crap coming out in Rezko's trial which could be very damaging to Obama's self made image.
Good on you, Juliania (July 24th, 2008 1:57 pm)!!
Green registration (not independent which is the officially "accepted" and innocuous means of expressing discontent) is sending a message to those traitors in Congress they cannot ignore!
Read why at Switch2Green.org.
They MUST know people are developing a different value system, represented by Green values and the Green platform. It says: THIS is what we want! Do THIS if you have the courage.
But to get the most effect, your representatives must KNOW you switched. It will show up in statistics which they can pretend to ignore, but your letter puts it right in their faces. At Switch2Green.org, you can send a message to your representatives about WHY you switched!
And...donate, too: to the Green Party and to the McKinney campaign. This is for several reasons.
Help the party and candidate fighting for a good showing to "get the People a seat at the table." < /li>
Support your own voice and agenda by building the Green Voice and the Green Party's ability to get paid or earned media. What Greens will be saying to all America about the war, torture, healthcare, justice, sustainable development and a myriad other issues will be your own thoughts and feelings about rebuilding our nation.
Who's paying? Uh, keep an eye out for PRODUCT placement?
Great link, Arvy. Thank you.
MariusP asked: "SO, Amy Goodman, who are you endorsing for President???"
Obama, of course. (Heh, heh... got to pay the bills, eh Amy?)
Corporations regard human being as tools to be used until they are broken, then thrown away...There are always new tools willing to be hired. Fraud created the law that allows corporations to exist...
Veteran '66-68
.OBAMA TOP CONTRIBUTORS
Goldman Sachs $606,080
University of California $488,159
JPMorgan Chase & Co $378,357
Citigroup Inc $371,704
UBS AG $370,850
Lehman Brothers $333,310
National Amusements Inc $332,839
Harvard University $325,424
Google Inc $321,964
Sidley Austin LLP $307,345
Skadden, Arps et al $281,163
Morgan Stanley $274,463
Time Warner $268,227
Jones Day $251,250
Exelon Corp $237,311
University of Chicago $230,175
Latham & Watkins $228,276
Microsoft Corp $222,578
Wilmerhale Llp $222,080
General Electric $210,329
.
.
http://www.opensecrets.org/pres08/contrib.php?cycle=2008&cid=N00009638
OBAMA TOP CONTRIBUTORS
" You gotta dance with the one who brung ya "
.
Who is paying for these political conventions?
Simple.
Who is on the S&P 500 index?
ARVY: Evocative posting and I read the link. Very interesting...
Does it really matter?
As a Green candidate for Congress in MS-01 for a Special Election, I was invited to an AARP forum. In my closing remarks, I spoke out against corporate campaign contributions. When it was the Republican and Democratic candidates' turns, both took the time to note that corporations cannot give money to federal campaigns. Of course, we all know that it's their PACs that contribute, but it's all the same. How many average Americans know that?
Transparency is good, but it's not enough. We need to eliminate the influence of corporations and wealthy individuals through a carefully designed system of limited contributions and public financing. Unfortunately, the FEC is owned and operated by the two major parties, as is the Congress. Change will not come from that direction.
John M. Wages, Jr.
www.VoteJohnWages.com
For myself, the whole political process at the highest level of party 'elites' hobnobbing in Denver and St. Paul is the like looking at the detritus in a forest floor; fallen molding leaves, broken twigs, and scrambling of invertebrates. The main structure of American society, as the comments above point out, are the lower 90% of the working folks who struggle to get by every day. We are the majestic trees and the debris on the forest floor are the so called 'elites.'
Amy Goodman writes: "Disclosure of what corporations are giving is not required until 60 days after each convention, which is essentially Election Day, so there is no time to challenge a candidate on particular corporate donors."
This is a very misleading statement ! While exact numbers are indeed hard to come by there are a number of groups doing excellent work on the subject. Among the best is The Center for Responsive Politics who through their Open Secrets Website have done the research to unmask the corporate contributors hidden by Bundling. There list of Top 20 Contributors for Obama and McCain can be found on their website.
For Obama go to: http://www.opensecrets.org/pres08/contrib.php?cycle=2008&cid=N00009638
For McCain go to : http://www.opensecrets.org/pres08/contrib.php?id=N00006424&cycle2=2008&goButt2.x=6&goButt2.y=10
Yes that right Obama has out raised McCain over 2 to 1 from the big business interest in this country.
So Amy......Stop leading people deeper into the fog !
SO, Amy Goodman, who are you endorsing for President???
the thing to keep in mind about this largesse is that it comes from people who are no more loyal to this country than Osama Bin Laden.
Jerry D. Rose July 24th, 2008 2:35 pm -- "Hell you could build a college seminar around this one article."
Sure could. But, considering current "academic freedom" trends, any such honest attempt to expose political realities would probably result in loss of tenure.
Sheldon Wolin's Inverted Totalitarianism is also well worth reading, if you haven't already.
"who's paying for the conventions?"
we are. in blood.
tetti_tatti :When will Democrats apologize to Nader?
And why are Democrats still getting one single vote from anyone, especially those who call themselves progressives? I'll tell u when the dems will apologize.NEVER!!!! Because the big corporations that fund the party wont let 'em.As for why progressive continue to vote Dem,I dunno.Maybe they think the Party will change(yea right)or they are scared of another 2000? I dont know why,but im one dem(well,former Dem)that wont get fooled again!
Juliana (1:57), great idea, changing party affiliation to Green; a way to "send a message" of a leftward swing in the country even if the party-changer does the same old-same old choice between the "lesser evil" of the two branches of the Corporacratic Party. 4 months ago I, a 50-year yellow dog Democrat, changed registration to Green and "felt good" about it, didn't even have to support Obama in order to get that feeling (see below about politics and feeling good). So try it folks, you'll like it! (Giving a couple of bucks to the Greens, who DONT get the corporate support about which Amy Goodman is writing, is not a bad idea either. Cynthia McKinney is actually struggling to raise $100,000!)
Arvy (1:07 and l:44), I missed that Counterpunch article you linked in my morning surf. Very thought-provoking, highly recommended: Joe Bageant reprint of a "deep throat" analysis of how as unlikely a vessel of political leadership as Obama could have emerged as the President-apparent. When consumerism becomes king of a culture, that power is reflected in giving us an issue-less "post political" electoral system in which a candidate is sold as a product who makes us "feel good." Hell you could build a college seminar around this one article.
Yesterday I posted on a pbs forum that the thing for Independents to do was to promptly change affiliation to Green, which I am doing. Golly gee, I managed to shut down the whole system it would seem! (Power to the people.) Bill Moyers did a classic piece on the conventions in '04 when NOW was actually a public service program instead of a corporate front. Bravo, Amy, keep it up.
Just another Politician Sale
ATT-NSA
tetti_tatti: You're question about support for the Democrat agenda and its presidential candidate is also answered by the "post-political age" article linked above.
At the time when the American military industrial complex is despised around the world, he is a front man out of central casting which will buy it more goodwill and new room to maneuver in the first 15 minutes after being sworn in that John McCain could in the next 100 years.
[...]
Barack Obama is in short order a far more reassuring prospect for the continued dominance of the financial elite than another four years of neo-conservative rule which in an almost historically unique combination of greed, ill will, incompetence and stupidity have brought the country to the edge of disaster. Audacity yes, change hardly.
So AT&T promised Democrats millions for their convention if they let the phone giant off the hook for spying on Americans illegally, which is what happened.
When will Democrats apologize to Nader?
And why are Democrats still getting one single vote from anyone, especially those who call themselves progressives?
When I was younger, political conventions were broadcast in prime time in their entirety. However, now that television news has become, like almost all the rest of television, a blather meant solely to amuse your boredom, the conventions - dull, bullshit ridden events about as amusing as visiting a sick person in a hospital - are given short shrift. And it doesn't matter in the least.
Does it matter? The entire exercise has become an anachronistic charade in the post-political age upon which the USA has now entered.
The two primary features of the post political age are a politics completely drained of all its contents and ability or willingness to be used as an agent of change in social or economic policy, and its full integrations into the world of American popular, consumer and entertainment culture. To such an extent that there exists today a seamless web between our political, economic, media and consumer cultures wherein the modes and values of one are completely integrated and compatible with the others.
One thing the ordinary person doesn't seem to grasp is that a corporation without those at the bottom, doing all the work, bringing in all the money, is like a car without an engine, or a human body without a heart (a literal one).