Middle East Democracy: Blowback Through the Looking Glass
"If I had a world of my own . . . nothing would be what it is, because everything would be what it isn't. And contrary wise, what is, it wouldn't be. And what it wouldn't be, it would." -Alice in Wonderland
Alice: "You want democracy in the Middle East?"
Uncle Sam: "I do."
Alice: "And Iran was a democracy?"
Uncle Sam: "It was."
Alice: "With a constitution?"
Uncle Sam: "Of course!"
Alice: "But you replaced that democracy with a dictatorship?"
Uncle Sam: " I certainly did!"
Alice: "I don't understand you?"
Uncle Sam: "My dear, how else will democracy flourish in the Middle East?"
Alice: "It's all so dreadfully confusing."
In Lewis Carroll's "Through the Looking Glass," the White Queen assured Alice that "it's a poor sort of memory that only works backwards." A contemporary reader stepping into the "looking glass" world of U.S. foreign policy in the Middle East may well understand the Queen's contrariness as "blowback" -- an event that appears to be without cause but is the unintended consequence of a past action. Blowback is a "sort of memory" that always works forward.
In 1953, Uncle Sam, at the behest of his British ally, stepped through the looking glass to attack Iran. The CIA's month-long covert war deposed the popularly elected Mohammad Mossadegh and ended the Middle East's oldest constitutional democracy.
To secure a foothold for democracy in the region -- and keep oil flowing at an Anglo-American price -- Uncle Sam placed Mohammad Reza Shah back on the Peacock Throne. The twenty-five years of oppressive dictatorship that followed was the "sort of memory" that came blowing back through the looking glass with the Islamic Revolution in 1979, which resulted in a fundamentalist Islamic theocracy in Iran and the transmogrification of Uncle Sam into "Shaytan Bozorg" -- the Great Satan.
The Islamic Revolution brought to power a group of fanatically anti-Western clerics who have inspired a generation of new recruits in the war against the imperialist aggression of the West; a war that blew back through the looking glass -- and the Twin Towers -- as the "War on Terror."
This June, both presumptive presidential candidates made their obligatory supplication at the American Israel Public Affairs Committee convention in Washington D.C. In the "looking glass" world of American politics, candidates for national office -- from federal dogcatcher to the White House -- cannot get elected without first being "voted in" by Israel's representatives in the United States.
John McCain told the AIPAC audience, "The State of Israel stands . . . as the great democracy of the Middle East. [It has] thrived and . . . built a nation that's an inspiration to free nations everywhere."
Barack Obama told the same audience, "In a state of constant insecurity, Israel has maintained a vibrant and open discourse, and a resilient commitment to the rule of law."
The White Queen told Alice, "Sometimes I've believed as many as six impossible things before breakfast."
In 1948, Uncle Sam was the first in line to recognize the birth of the State of Israel in the Land of Palestine. The birth pain of this "great [Jewish-only] democracy of the Middle East" is known to the entirety of the Arab world as the "Nakhba" (catastrophe) -- the murder of 800 Palestinian Arabs in twenty-four separate Israeli terror attacks that were calculated to initiate the "ethnic cleansing" of 700,000 Palestinians and the destruction of 500 villages.
After the Six-Day War in 1967, Israel occupied and began to illegally settle the whole of the Land of Palestine. It has since created an apartheid state whose "resilient commitment to the rule of law" has forced over four million Palestinians behind walls and beyond the reach of human rights.
In its sixty-years as an "inspiration to free nations everywhere," Israel has yet to draft a constitution, much less a bill of rights. To do so would mean the self-destruction of the Jewish State as envisioned by the Zionist ideology that created and sustains it. If Israel is to self-destruct, it will be in an apocalyptic battle to save itself from itself.
Uncle Sam's implicit support for Israel's repressive policies against the Palestinian people and his overt support of Israel's aggression against neighboring states has blown back through the looking glass with Iran's determination to acquire the nuclear technology with which to both power and protect itself.
As AIPAC-vetted politicians vow to "totally obliterate" Iran if it continues along a nuclear path, the other side of the looking glass reveals Uncle Sam offering to help the Shah develop an Iranian nuclear weapons program in the 1970s, just as he had earlier given a wink and a nod -- and no doubt assistance -- as Israel began developing its now 200-strong nuclear arsenal.
Uncle Sam's foreign policy in the Middle East has created Alice's contrary world where "what is, it wouldn't be. And what it wouldn't be, it would." It is a world filled with the "sort of memory" that always works forward to become the stuff of nightmares and the roost for returning chickens.
Alice: "So, you ended a democracy that was and support a "democracy" that isn't or ever will be until it ceases being a "democracy" so that democracy will flourish in a land whose only experience of democracy has been what democracy isn't?"
Uncle Sam: "Well said!"
Alice: "It would be so nice if something made sense for a change."
Robert Weitzel is a contributing editor to Media With a Conscience. His essays regularly appear in The Capital Times in Madison, WI. He can be contacted at: robertweitzel@mac.com
Twitter
StumbleUpon
Facebook
Delicious
Digg
Newsvine
Google
Yahoo
Technorati
29 Comments so far
Show AllBravo! for those who are so well read on "American Exceptionalism"
Add to William Blum, Chalmers Johnson...the names of Noam Chomsky, Edward Herman (who's he?) and so many others who are NEVER interviewed by the likes of CNN, ABC, NBC, CBS and, NO, not even NPR (except Chomsky has appeared at least once in 30 years!)National Petroleum Radio!
The libraries do not carry all of these authors but they do carry some; you can request ANY of their books thru your public libraries if they don't.
The bloody, sordid historical record of our imposing "democracy" on defenseless nations is wide and deep; now with the internet it is also accessible even if you don't have a computer; go to your local library and do some work and you will be immensely rewarded, if you are TRULY interested.
Correct me if I am wrong--but hasn't there been speculation by people like Uri Avnery in Counterpunch and Scott Ritter that the at the very least the military leadership in the US and Israel are starting to realize the folly of attacking Iran?
Weren't Ritter and Avnery arguing that the Iranian missle exercise pretty much solidified whatever doubts already existed among advocates of a "surgical air strike" that an attack on Iran will be a military fiasco?
This is not to say that the madmen and madwomen among the ruling classes are going to give up so easily (and I include Obama in this list).
Of course I could be wrong but I think there are ample signs that even the neo-cons are starting to figure out that the time has come and passed for a strike on Iran.
Unusually informed comments, all. Thank you.
Add this to the mix, please: A common belief is that the first aerial bombing was committed by the Fascists at Guernica, Spain, but look up Ocotal, Nicaragua, 1927. Hawaii in 1893, the Philippines 5 years later, etc etc etc. And where do you place Native American genocide and the destabilization of the entire African continent caused by European and European-American slave raids in north and west Africa? It did not start after WWII. It is not a new thing caused by the military-industrial complex. It is a more complex and psychological complex. Until we start looking at the deeper causes and recognize our part in it we will not stop this. We have a dark past, present, and future because the darkness is within us, unacknowledged.
Blowback in psychological terms is called projective identification or dreaming up—where you project onto others the dark parts of yourself, then begin to imagine the others are that darkness, even if they aren't, and then take actions which turn them into exactly what you imagined them to be. If you think the world is dangerous and arm yourself with tanks and guns and bombs the rest of the world will see it and arm themselves, and you will see that and strike first, and others, even untouched, will begin to strike at you first. (And who in the world has not been touched by US corporate imperialism?) Voila, you have created what you imagined: a dangerous world. Bush and Osama, dreaming each other up… Liberals and conservatives, dreaming each other up… All of us together dreaming up Bush… and McCain. Matthew 7:2-5. www.awakeninthedream.com/
What about the people from the island of Diego Garcia in the Indian Ocean? They were forcebly removed from their homeland and sent into exile so we could have a Navy base.
And how about East Timor?
And what about the US attempts to assasinate Hugo Chavez? You could add Venezuela to the list of attepts.
We have a very dark past.
If the U.S. martialed its resources ala WWII, the Manhattan Project or the space program, North America -- and ultimately the globe -- could be converted to 100% clean, renewable energy. However, the global economic/political power base (EPPB) -- not the politicians of the various nations, including the U.S., who are just the EPPB's silly little toadies -- continues to mass an effort directly opposed to such a conversion because it is in the EPPB's interest to keep the planet rooted in the fossil fuel quagmire. The same holds true for armed conflict. A concentrated effort towards diplomacy could solve nearly every global dispute -- assuming a rational as opposed to an avaricious approach to reaching fair compromises -- but it is in the interest of the EPPB to perpetuate war.
Here are the chapters from William Blum's Killing Hope about the history of CIA crimes:
http://members.aol.com/bblum6/American_holocaust.htm
 Introduction to the new edition
 Introduction to the original edition
 1. China - 1945 to 1960s: Was Mao Tse-tung just paranoid?
 2. Italy - 1947-1948: Free elections, Hollywood style
 3. Greece - 1947 to early 1950s: From cradle of democracy to client     state
 4. The Philippines - 1940s and 1950s: America's oldest colony
 5. Korea - 1945-1953: Was it all that it appeared to be?
 6. Albania - 1949-1953: The proper English spy
 7. Eastern Europe - 1948-1956: Operation Splinter Factor
 8. Germany - 1950s: Everything from juvenile delinquency to terrorism
 9. Iran - 1953: Making it safe for the King of Kings
10. Guatemala - 1953-1954: While the world watched
11. Costa Rica - Mid-1950s: Trying to topple an ally - Part 1
12. Syria - 1956-1957: Purchasing a new government
13. Middle East - 1957-1958: The Eisenhower Doctrine claims
  another backyard for America
14. Indonesia - 1957-1958: War and pornography
15. Western Europe - 1950s and 1960s: Fronts within fronts within fronts
16. British Guiana - 1953-1964: The CIA's international labor mafia
17. Soviet Union - Late 1940s to 1960s: From spy
  planes to book publishing
18. Italy - 1950s to 1970s: Supporting the Cardinal's
  orphans and techno-fascism
19. Vietnam - 1950-1973: The Hearts and Minds Circus
20. Cambodia - 1955-1973: Prince Sihanouk walks the
  high-wire of neutralism
21. Laos - 1957-1973: L'Armée Clandestine
22. Haiti - 1959-1963: The Marines land, again
23. Guatemala - 1960: One good coup deserves another
24. France/Algeria - 1960s: L'état, c'est la CIA
25. Ecuador - 1960-1963: A text book of dirty tricks
26. The Congo - 1960-1964: The assassination of Patrice Lumumba
27. Brazil - 1961-1964: Introducing the marvelous
  new world of death squads
28. Peru - 1960-1965: Fort Bragg moves to the jungle
29. Dominican Republic - 1960-1966: Saving democracy
  from communism by getting rid of democracy
30. Cuba - 1959 to 1980s: The unforgivable revolution
31. Indonesia - 1965: Liquidating President Sukarno ...
  and 500,000 others  ...... East Timor - 1975: And 200,000 more
32. Ghana - 1966: Kwame Nkrumah steps out of line
33. Uruguay - 1964-1970: Torture -- as American as apple pie
34. Chile - 1964-1973: A hammer and sickle stamped
  on your child's forehead
35. Greece - 1964-1974: "Fuck your Parliament and your
  Constitution," said the President of the United States
36. Bolivia - 1964-1975: Tracking down Che Guevara
  in the land of coup d'etat
37. Guatemala - 1962 to 1980s: A less publicized "final solution"
38. Costa Rica - 1970-1971: Trying to topple an ally -- Part 2
39. Iraq - 1972-1975: Covert action should not
  be confused with missionary work
40. Australia - 1973-1975: Another free election bites the dust
41. Angola - 1975 to 1980s: The Great Powers Poker Game
42. Zaire - 1975-1978: Mobutu and the CIA, a marriage made in heaven
43. Jamaica - 1976-1980: Kissinger's ultimatum
44. Seychelles - 1979-1981: Yet another area of
  great strategic importance
45. Grenada - 1979-1984: Lying -- one of the few growth
  industries in Washington
46. Morocco - 1983: A video nasty
47. Suriname - 1982-1984: Once again, the Cuban bogeyman
48. Libya - 1981-1989: Ronald Reagan meets his match
49. Nicaragua - 1981-1990: Destabilization in slow motion
50. Panama - 1969-1991: Double-crossing our drug supplier
51. Bulgaria 1990/Albania 1991: Teaching communists
  what democracy is all about
52. Iraq - 1990-1991: Desert holocaust
53. Afghanistan - 1979-1992: America's Jihad
54. El Salvador - 1980-1994: Human rights, Washington style
55. Haiti - 1986-1994: Who will rid me of this
turbulent priest?
56. The American Empire - 1992 to present
Afghanistan 2001-2008+
Iraq 2003-2008+
Somalia 2007-2008+
Haiti (again) 2004-2008+
This article tracks the loss of my rational mind into the world of alter-reality and how some of the ding-a-lings have to think to support their program, which makes no sense to anyone but them, and not to them either, since it can never be acknowledged publicly or privately to their own, still surviving? moral minds. The public debate, the media chunk of attention, most Americans ideas much elicit a daily barrage of snickers, guffaws, or gut-busting laughter from these principles of the oil-sucking autocracy.
What Alice isn't is what she was but lost track of after she couldn't pay attention because of all the isn'ts that were but became irrelevant as the older unacknowledgeds were being buried deeper. Oil doesn't come from a tit, it comes from deep within the live womb of the succulent Mother Earth. Just follow the s.o.b.s' umbilical cord. It goes deep into what used to be and still is mostly (<50%) but isn't all where we think it is or is supposed to be, according to the map, or maybe it isn't. Do you know?
The bigger problem is that most people don't read--much of anything, much less Alice in Wonderland's choice wordings--or don't care to begin with. I do. Do you?
Have a nice inflationary life while the budget deficit unravels. Riding a bicycle is a little counter-intuitive, but it moves us out of this hole a milli-spoke non-word at a time. Most Americans need to exercise their calves more and their guts less, not to mention their Omega-3 complex. Have a Good Night.
Bravo Lewis Carroll! Bravo Robert Weitzel!
maybe one of the reasons some people ridiculously expect anything altruistic from a war with Iran is that they see reading and intelligence as personality flaws. Ã la Idiocracy.
Thank You postdementia.
beyondpsychotic
"Israel is a not a democracy but is an Ethnocracy, meaning a country run and controlled by a national group with some democratic elements but set up with Jews in control and structured to keep them in control."-Jeff Halper, Founder and Coordinator of ICAHD/Israeli Committee Against House Demolitions and a Noble Peace Prize Nominee for 2006, to me during one of my five trips to Israel and occupied Palestine since June 2005.
Jeff also told me:
"The issue of the occupation is a global issue that transcends boundaries and Israel Palestine impacts all global realities.
"We have a country created by the UN and supported by the USA that has a brutal occupation while International Law defines occupation as a temporary situation.
"When you incorporate occupied territories, highways, settlements and use resources it is all illegal according to the Fourth Geneva Convention which states the status quo must be retained so that negotiations can happen. Unilateral actions are illegal. The occupying power is responsible for those under its control.
"Tony Blair said 70% of all the conflicts in the world can be traced back to the Israeli Palestinian conflict. What gives us hope is that as this conflict worsens maybe Europe will figure out that American policies are against their interests and intervene. If we do fix this conflict it would be a tremendous step forward in global reconciliation. This whole issue is based on Human Rights and it is a global issue requiring global intervention...
"It has been said that the Israelis do not love this land, they just want to possess it. There have been three stages to make this occupation permanent. The first was to establish the facts on the ground; the settlements. There are ½ million Israeli's and four million Palestinians here. They have been forced into Bantustan; truncated mini states; prison states. It is apartheid and Bush and Hillary are both willing collaborators.
"In 1977, Sharon came in with a mandate, money and resources to make the Israeli presence in the West Bank irreversible. The second stage began in April 2004 when America approved the Apartheid/Convergence/Realignment Plan and eight settlement blocs. This is just like South Africa!
"The Bush Sharon letter exchange guaranteed that the USA considers the settlements non-negotiable. The Convergence Plan and The Wall create the borders and that is what defines Bantustans. Congress ratified the Bush plan and only Senator Byrd of West Virginia voted no and nine House Representatives.
"Israel has set up a matrix of control; a thick web of settlements guaranteed to make the occupation permanent by establishing facts on the ground. Israel denies there is an occupation, so everything is reduced to terrorism. It is our job to insist upon the human rights issue, for occupied people have International Law on their side."
I asked Jeff if the settlements were in actuality colonies; meaning foreigners had invaded and set up residence in another's territory. He agreed and added that, "When Jerusalem was controlled by Jordan, the East side was 6 sq. km. Since 1967, Israel has added 64 km. The West side was 38 sq. km until '67 and is now 108 sq. km's. Israel plans to develop 17 settlements. Israeli policy is to maintain a 72% Jewish and 28% Arab population. Palestinians cannot get building permits to build upon their legally owned land. The Arab land has been re-zoned as green space, and the green space will be re-zoned for the settlements. Every single Palestinian home in Jerusalem has a demolition order. The entire West Bank has been zoned as agricultural land by Israel, and that will also be re-zoned again for more settlements."
Orwellian doublespeak has also been employed in the USA government and media to turn the illegal colonies: for all the settlements are considered illegal according to International Law, into 'neighborhoods' and the facts on the ground remain-and I quote Jeff:
"Israel is not a democracy, it is an ethnocracy: full rights to Jews, but not Palestinians."
PS-Before Jeff moved from Hibbing, Minnesota [and yes, he knew Dylan when he was still Zimmerman!]during the Vietnam era, he told his Grandma he was moving to Israel and she responded:
"Israel is no place for a nice Jewish boy!"
e
http://www.wearewideawake.org/
Podhertz,
Regardless if its 50 or just 1 elected government overthrown, would it have been worth 1 dead american soldier?
i am - i hesitate to use the word - pleased to see the american death machine finally given its due credit for all their shenanigans over the years. it has been a big secret over the years and now the death, torture, mutilation, lies, deceit are coming to the fore.
in his great book, Nemesis: the last days of the american public,Chalmers Johnson outlines the list and impact of the 757 american bases around the world (57 already in iraq) and their impact on the countries who house them. talk about terrorism
check it out here:
http://www.amazon.com/Nemesis-American-Republic-Empire-Project/dp/0805079114
that book is part of a trilogy that everyone should read, here are the other two titles
Blowback: The Costs and Consequences of American Empire
The Sorrows of Empire: Militarism, Secrecy, and the End of the Republic
all of this killing done in the name of he united states of america, god, apple pie and the profit of corporations.
this is past debating
this has been done in your name and you own it.
store rules: you broke it - you bought it
This is what Egyptians think of their dictator for the last three decades (who sticks around thanks to generosity running in the tens of billions of US taxpayers).
Another ex-military "leader" backed by the US enjoys 75% unfavorable ratings according to this recent report (PDF): When Pakistanis were asked which one leader was the best person to handle the country's problems, Musharraf was the choice of only three percent.
Certainly not all overthrows, but a sample of U.S. subversion post WWII:
China 1945 -60's
Italy 1947-48
Greece 1947-50's
Philippines 40's & 50's
Albania 1949-53
Germany 1950's
Iran 1953
Guatemala 1953-54
Costa Rica mid 50's
Syria
The Middle East 1957-58
Indonesia 1957-58
British Guyana 1953-64
Soviet Union 1940's-60's
Italy (again) 1950's-70's
Vietnam 1950-73
Cambodia 1955-73
Laos 1957-73
Haiti 1959-63
Guatemala (again) 1960
Algeria 1960's
Ecuador 1960-63
The Congo 1960-64
Brazil 1961-64
Peru 1960-65
Dominican Republic 1960-66
Cuba 1959-80's
Indonesia 1965
Ghana 1966
Uruguay 1964-70
Chile 1964-73
Greece (again) 1964-74
Bolivia 1964-75
Guatemala (again) 1962-80's
Iraq 1972-75
Australia 1973-75
Angola 1975-80's
Zaire 1975-78
Jamaica 1976-80
Seychelles 1979-81
Grenada 1979-84
Morocco 1983
Suriname 1982-84
Libya 1981-89
Nicaragua 1978-90
Panama 1969-91
Bulgaria 1990
Iraq (again) 1990-91
Afghanistan 1979-92
El Salvador 1980-94
Haiti (again) 1986-94
Podhertz:
http://academic.evergreen.edu/g/grossmaz/interventions.html
podhertz:
http://www.thirdworldtraveler.com/Blum/US_Interventions_WBlumZ.html
http://www.antiwar.com/pilger/?articleid=12251
http://academic.evergreen.edu/g/grossmaz/interventions.html
There's a good start for you. But really, this information is freely available on the net. A good habit to get into is that if someone makes an assertion, don't just be lazy and ask for a source, look it up yourself. Then you can either prove or disprove their assertion, without looking like a lazy bugger.
Barn Burner (2:09} I agree - Correct me if I'm wrong, but I've never heard of a left wing paramilitary.
podhertz:
" . . . FIFTY democracies America has subverted using this model over the decades.
. . . " ?
Will appreciate responses from anyone having
this information/
---------------------
"Since 1945, the United States has attempted to overthrow fifty governments, many of them democracies. In the process, thrity countries have been attacked and bombed, causing the loss of countless lives"
-- John Pilger in 'War on Democracy' (about 37 mins in)
Check it out here: http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article18236.htm
The USA may not have subverted as many as fifty countries. But the point is, even one country subverted is one too many!
Start with Mexico. Halliburton and Pemex are partnering. The DEA, CIA and State Dept are all over the country; Watch The War ON Democracy, online, free and see what we've done to Central and South America. Then extrapolate to the present in Mexico and use your imagination. That is one, six inches from America.
Move to Cuba. Palestine. Saudi Arabia. Kuwait. The United Arab Emirates. Vietnam. Iraq. Back to Venezuala-right now.
Iran '53. Iran again 2008. Korea. Afghanistan. Pakistan. Kosovo.
I clarify; Fifty is the appx number of countries brutalized by American intervention, Murder and coups, however,
Their politics varied prior to being attacked by the US. Although not all were democracies as I mistakenely stated, all were emerging young economies.... They became death and torture pits so the US could steal their resources and dominate them militarily.
Sorry I can't find the list this second. I'll look again later.
I can't give you the 50 example of U.S. use of the same tactics used in Iran to depose a democracy but the U.S. has had their finger in supporting every right wing dictator in just about every country in South and Central America-some by murder others by support of right-wing forces. In fact I can not think of one instance where the U.S. has supported a legally elected leader in any country that was even a little left of center-correct me if I am wrong.
podhertz - William Blum's Killing Hope should provide some insight into the subject.
We can only hope that our generals will have as much integrity as the shaw's!
podhertz - Steve Kinzer's "Overthrow" would be a good start.
lisa3210peace
Can you provide references or lists of the
" . . . FIFTY democracies America has subverted using this model over the decades.
. . . " ?
Will appreciate responses from anyone having
this information/
The world seen though the 'smoky mirror' indeed. Fisk could not have said it better.
Great insight.
and Sami - I would not have said noses.
Beware the ides of August.
The coup in Iran in '53 cost the CIA less than two million dollars.
The Iranian people resisted. The CIA-trained SAVAK tortured killed and 'disappeared' all resistance to the Shah for 46 years. FORTY SIX YEARS OF AMERICAN TORTURE AND MURDER. For Democracy.
In Tehran Square, in 1979 the odds were better than 50% that ANYONE you could see or touch had a family member dead or SAVAK/CIA TORTURED-KILLED.
When the people became a wave of humanity manifest in Revolution, the Shah ordered his Generals to En-Mass Machine Gun the crowds with emplaced 50 calibers.
The Generals rrefused and the Shah Fled to America.
Democracy by The Land Of The Free.
Iran is one of about FIFTY democracies America has subverted using this model over the decades.
This is a great and incise article.
And here will come posters that defend the MURDER OF PALESTINE: her babies, her women, her men.
Brilliant Sattire! I doubt it will make Policy Makers see beyond their pompous noses.