EMAIL SIGN UP!
Most Popular This Week
- One American Who Isn't For Sale
- Edward Snowden: Saving Us from the United Stasi of America
- Major Loss to Organic Farmers as Court Rules in Favor of Monsanto
- The Judicial Lynching of Bradley Manning
- Remembering Satyajit Ray’s Hirok Rajar Deshe: On Edward Snowden, Resistance and Inverted Totalitarianism
Popular content
Today's Top News
Uribe Admits Red Cross Emblem Used In Hostage Rescue
BOGOTA - Colombian President Alvaro Uribe acknowledged that his army used the Red Cross emblem in its bloodless July 2 rescue of 15 hostages, a move the humanitarian agency swiftly denounced as "abusive."
Uribe allowed Wednesday that one army official wore a vest with the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) emblem but said that it was because the official was nervous about the operation and there were many leftist rebels on the scene.
So "the official took a piece of cloth out of his pocket with the initials CICR (ICRC) on it, and he put it on his vest; we are sorry that this has happened," Uribe said, suggesting there was no effort at deception.
CNN television reported that it had viewed unpublished photos and video of the rescue in which a military official is seen using the emblem of the international humanitarian organization, in what some said could be deemed a "war crime."
Uribe said he presented his apologies to the ICRC on Wednesday morning, but Red Cross outrage over the incident was immediate.
"The emblem of the Red Cross needs to be respected in all circumstances and cannot be used in an abusive manner," the ICRC said in a statement from Bogota.
In Geneva, ICRC spokeswoman Florian Westphal said: "The respect of the emblem is crucial so the ICRC can bring help to people affected by the conflicts in Colombia or elsewhere."
Westphal said it was important that Uribe "had admitted the error that had been committed."
The organization did not say whether it would take any action as a result of the misuse.
Hours after the dramatic rescue of the hostages from the hands of the Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia (FARC), the country's army commander General Mario Montoya publicly denied -- in Uribe's presence -- that his men used emblems from the humanitarian organization.
"Not one insignia, Mr. President, not from the Red Cross or anything like it, nor from any humanitarian mission whatsoever," Montoya had said, in describing the operation which tricked the Marxist rebels into handing over the 15 hostages, including French-Colombian politician Ingrid Betancourt and three US defense contractors.
It was not immediately clear how Uribe's revelation will affect the ICRC's role in ongoing attempts to free an estimated 700 hostages still held by FARC.
ICRC, which reports having 318 staff in Colombia including 57 non-Colombians, has been active in dialogue with the rebels for years, as various groups including the Colombian, French and Swiss governments have sought to negotiate hostage releases.
On its website, the ICRC warns that "perfidy" -- "making use of the emblem in time of conflict to protect combatants or military equipment" -- violates the Geneva Conventions.
"Perfidious use of the emblem is a war crime in both international and noninternational armed conflict," the ICRC states on its website.
"The ICRC, a neutral and impartial humanitarian organization, must enjoy the trust of all the parties to the conflict to be able to carry out its humanitarian work," said an ICRC statement released in Bogota.
The lawyer of Gerardo Aguilar and Alexander Farfan, the two FARC members captured in the operation, said his clients told ICRC representatives they had been tricked by the soldiers' use of emblems of the Red Cross and of the Telesur television network.
"They have said it on several occasions, indicating that the (Colombian) army pretended to be the International Red Cross, and that three or four people in the operation used Red Cross emblems," attorney Rodolfo Rios told AFP.
Colombia's general prosecutor Mario Iguaran said he believed the act of "perfidy" could not be applied in the hostage-rescue case, because "the objective of the military operation was to liberate hostages and not to attack or harm the adversary."
Uribe said the name of the official in the rescue operation would not be disclosed to protect him from threats and "because we do not want to harm his career."
© 2008 Agence France Presse
Comments
Note: Disqus 2012 is best viewed on an up to date browser. Click here for information. Instructions for how to sign up to comment can be viewed here. Our Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines. Note to Readers: Spam Filter May Capture Legitimate Comments...



13 Comments so far
Show AllJessica Lynch redux
Colombia's general prosecutor Mario Iguaran said he believed the act of "perfidy" could not be applied in the hostage-rescue case, because "the objective of the military operation was to liberate hostages and not to attack or harm the adversary."
___________________________________________
Iguaran and Alberto Gonzales must have been classmates!
This lame rationalization is as perfidious as the perfidy it attempts to refute. It's a poorly disguised variation on "the end justifies the means".
Nothing will come of it, I suppose. Nations don't seem to get in a Nuremberg mood any more.
So now any resistance fighter will assume that a Red Cross is the badge of Corporate Assassins. Heckovajob, even for a Bush lackey.
This is just plain wrong and can only be done by an American ally. Does this asshole realize he just signed the death warrant of a bunch of other innocent civilians just so as to satisfy 'western' interests by rescuing 'white' people. Hopefully the FARC will toast this mu__f__er.
The use of the Red Cross for this type of purpose is a violation of the Rules Of War. There can be no justification for ever using it in a manner inconsistent with it's intended purpose. Mr. Uribe should be prosecuted for it's use.
What is not said is that the use of the RC emblem is an ex post facto 'demonization' strategy by claiming it was required to be a shield against what the army 'feared'.
It is notable that an army with an historically antagonistic record which has methodically 'demonized', has inadvertantly proven an aspect of the humanity of those it has historically alienated by abuse of precisely the ethical scope that it claimes to be absent in those it has in effect, created. The respect shown the RC by FARC is the only positive aspect of this. Why is this not analyzed in an historical context and demystified?
That's a war crime.
It violates the 1st Geneva Convention, Chapter 7.
Art. 44. With the exception of the cases mentioned in the following paragraphs of the present Article, the emblem of the red cross on a white ground and the words " Red Cross" or " Geneva Cross " may not be employed, either in time of peace or in time of war, except to indicate or to protect the medical units and establishments, the personnel and material protected by the present Convention and other Conventions dealing with similar matters.
Only those with real patience will learn what really happened - just like every other CIA fuck-up in the past.
Yet another "will I live long enough to find out what really happened" event. Currently drowning in a sea of obvious propaganda.
Does it fool Americans? I desperately hope not, but deep down inside I know it does.
Believe the god myth and you'll believe anything.
Some lines should never be crossed for whatever reason.
The Red Cross has been set back in it's ability to function due to this. The price of one victory will be the death of many workers to come.
How clever some people think they are. How sad-----
Quick, call the dog and pony wranglers! There is a lot of ass to cover! This rescue story is aging like fish on the beach.
Well this dog and pony show has been brought to you by America's puppet Uribe. Uribe thinks the end justifies the means. The Colombian Army's hijacking of the Red Cross's good name is a war crime. Viva FARC!
Uribe is a mainline Narco-Traficante criminal partner of George Murder Bush protected by the DEA.
When having sex, Bush and Uribi often where the insignia of the ICRC while whispering of 'le petite morte' to one another and snorting cocaine.
"Nothing will come of it, I suppose. Nations don't seem to get in a Nuremberg mood any more."
Ha
And even when they do, the U.S. and its allies just ignore the ruling and keep doing what they were doing.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nicaragua_v._United_States