EMAIL SIGN UP!
Most Popular This Week
- Wisconsin Bill Would Treat Organic Milk, Sharp Cheddar, Brown Eggs as "Junk Food"
- Patent Filing Claims Solar Energy ‘Breakthrough’
- Climate Change's 'Evil Twin': Ocean Acidification
- Disaster Capitalism Strikes as Hedge Funds Circle Near-Bankrupt Municipalities Like Vultures
- Ignoring Bee Crisis, EPA Greenlights New 'Highly Toxic' Pesticide
- Patent Filing Claims Solar Energy ‘Breakthrough’
- Wisconsin Bill Would Treat Organic Milk, Sharp Cheddar, Brown Eggs as "Junk Food"
- Climate Change's 'Evil Twin': Ocean Acidification
- In 'March Toward Disaster,' World Hits 400 PPM Milestone
- Ignoring Bee Crisis, EPA Greenlights New 'Highly Toxic' Pesticide
Popular content
Today's Top News
Ban These Bombs That Kill Indiscriminately
More than half of the world's countries agreed to ban cluster bombs that cause unacceptable harm to civilians following 10 days of intense negotiations in Dublin, Ireland. The U.S. government wasn't there.
Based upon my experience testing these weapons, and later watching how the U.S. military misused them, I believe this is a profound mistake.
I was drafted into the Army at the height of the Vietnam War. Having nearly completed a degree in mechanical engineering, I was offered an engineering position at the end of basic training. This was pretty good duty for enlisted personnel, so I accepted and was assigned to the position of project director, special ammunition, at Yuma Proving Grounds in Arizona.
My job was to test experimental cluster munitions. These weapons have a "mother" canister that opens in mid-air, releasing hundreds of smaller bombs, or grenades. When they hit the ground, these small bombs spew deadly shrapnel over very large swathes of land.
Following tests, demolition crews would scour the impact area for "duds," mark their positions and explode them in place. We usually found that about 10-20 percent of the submunitions would fail to explode.
The purpose of this type of ammunition, as explained to me, was to fire on a group of soldiers on the march in open areas, not the sort of counterinsurgencies the U.S. military faced in Vietnam and that it faces today. They certainly were not intended for use in areas with dense jungle canopies, as in Laos, Vietnam or Cambodia, nor were they intended for use in civilian-populated areas in countries like the former Yugoslavia, Afghanistan and Iraq.
Nevertheless, the U.S. military used cluster bombs in all of these places.
Unfortunately, when the target is a village or city, demolition crews rarely go in afterward to clean up the deadly mess of unexploded grenades. The results have been predictable: high numbers of dud cluster submunitions littering the landscapes, producing large numbers of civilian casualties for weeks, months - even decades, in the case of Laos - after the war ended.
What's worse, this litter is particularly appealing to curious children. The cluster submunitions I worked with had little pink stabilizing ribbons that made them look like toys. Children pick them up and swing the grenade around by the ribbon, thereby activating it. Children ages 5-15, and boys in particular, account for almost half of all cluster bomb casualties in the 20 countries affected by cluster-bombs around the world.
Farmers, de-miners and even U.S. soldiers also fall victim to this deadly litter. An MP in our barracks found some unexploded cluster submunitions while guarding an impact area. Since he did not have need-to-know clearance, he had no idea what they were and used them to decorate his footlocker! Fortunately, they were dummies and not highly explosive.
Similarly, when U.S. soldiers stumbled upon tens of thousands of dud U.S. submunitions in the deserts of Saudi Arabia and Iraq during Operation Desert Storm (Iraq, 1991), they did not know what the litter was. As a result of their curiosity, this type of U.S. weaponry killed and injured more American troops than any Iraqi weapon system during that war.
Those who know these weapons well, like I do, believe that their time has passed. Most of the world agrees that it is time to put an end to the use of these weapons, which have killed and wounded more civilians than soldiers. The U.S. should join with its closest allies in banning these indiscriminate weapons.
--Dick Devlin is a retired manufacturing engineer.
© 2008 The Salt Lake Tribune
Comments
Note: Disqus 2012 is best viewed on an up to date browser. Click here for information. Instructions for how to sign up to comment can be viewed here. Our Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines. Note to Readers: Spam Filter May Capture Legitimate Comments...

13 Comments so far
Show AllThe devil is in the details isn't it. Let's ban the bad weapons that don't kill properly. This is why the DOD welfare recipients need more money to construct weapons that kill more discriminately?
Wealth spent building feel good weapons. Trial, judge and jury in a flash of light and wiff of cordite. Give us a f*&king break!
People, we have to attack the weapons manufacturers, the mothers of all countless welfare entitlements. "Gimme, gimme", Raytheon will shriek like a parasite attacking the drugged US host. Lazy, no good for nothing Defense Contractors. Barack's staunchly conservative welfare-to-work acollades will serve the pigs of the DOD well, as they learn to better themselves through hard work and self reliance.
...ban cluster bombs???
What will the Jews use to murder and maim Arab children - year after year?
It's either bombs or birth control. Take your pick.
Why I wouldn't vote for Hillary Clinton. In the Senate she voted against banning the use or sale of cluster bombs!
Ban all bombs and all tools designed to kill.
"It's either bombs or birth control. Take your pick." I am surprised you said this ezflyer.
Of course cluster bombs are especially harmful to farmers and curious children and should be banned immediately. But the title of the article implies that what we need is really accurate bombs. I go along with OldBadgertoo. All bombs are heinous weapons of the armed robbery and serial killing that is war.
An I missing something in my old age? I thought all BOMBS kill!
In other words, we either control our population numbers humanely, or nature will do it for us with war, famine, crime and other cruel ecological adjustments.
War itself kills indiscriminately. Let's not forget what's happening and has happened on the ground in both Iraq and Afghanistan, not to mention Vietnam. Banning cluster bombs would certainly be a step in the right direction, but it would be just one step among the many that are needed.
If they won't get rid of these, let the engineers shorten their shelf life... find a way for duds to just LOSE their "fire power" so that they don't explode on children 10 years after the peace treaty is signed and the innocents go out to play.
Why? As Curtis LeMay said there are no innocent civilians.
if it's birthcontrol you want, you should start with bombing South East Asia, India, subSaraha Africa, the Arab countries and the Christian sectarian cities, cause these breed the fastest.
Libanon isn't an Arab country, it's a melting pot and the population growth isn't fast at all. bomb India. they breed like roaches.
Mr. Devlin is exactly correct in his conclusion.