After years of looking the other way, Atlanta police recently cracked down on a monthly bicycle ride through the city streets that includes blocking cars and flouting traffic laws.
At least 10 officers, eight on motorcycles and two in patrol cars, followed more than 300 bicyclists through downtown Atlanta, Little Five Points and Virginia-Highland on June 27 from about 6:30 to 8 p.m. Most of the bicyclists stopped for red lights they normally would have ignored. At least two bicyclists were ticketed for disobeying traffic laws.
Atlanta police Officer Ron Campbell said the police targeted the bicyclists because they did not have a permit to stop traffic.
"When you don't have the permit, you have to obey the traffic laws," Campbell said. "If bikers are out there and they're not obeying the traffic laws, we will ticket them."
The bicyclists were participating in Critical Mass, an international bike movement that arrived in Atlanta in 1999. On the last Friday of every month, they take over streets. They ride four and five abreast and "cork" intersections to block cars and allow the mass to stay together through red lights.
It can take several light changes for the entire group to roll through an intersection. Cars also get jammed up behind the mass, traveling at the pedaling speed of about 10 miles per hour. In the past, some motorists have honked angrily at the bicyclists while others yelled at them to get out of the way. Many more quietly waited it out.
The in-your-face message to drivers is that bicyclists also have a right to the road. When there are enough bicyclists - a critical mass - it also shows drivers what it feels like to be the second-class vehicle.
Atlanta police generally have taken a see-no-evil approach to the loosely organized monthly event that starts in downtown Atlanta's Woodruff Park, although occasionally bicyclists have been ticketed. During the April ride, a police officer directing traffic for the Bruce Springsteen concert at Philips Arena stopped cars to let the bicyclists through.
Last month's show of force was a departure from past practice and amounted to a crackdown. It came one month after an article about the event appeared in The Atlanta Journal-Constitution, publicity that bicyclist Shelby Highsmith said police could not ignore. The rides also have grown much larger, from fewer than 30 riders a month to groups that approach 400.
Police in other cities, where riders number in the thousands, also have tried to control Critical Mass. In Chicago last August, police took control of a ride and forbade bicyclists to complete the route.
Highsmith, a graduate student in mechanical engineering at Georgia Tech, said Critical Mass would not be the same if the bicyclists followed the rules.
"The little bit of disruptiveness and the civil disobedience is a part of raising awareness [about bicycles] in a more conspicuous way," he said.
The group wants both better infrastructure for bicycles, including bike racks and lanes, and to show drivers that they, too, can hop out of the car and onto a bike.
Even within the bicycling community, Critical Mass is controversial. The split is over whether the monthly rides create more enemies than allies, and whether breaking traffic laws is ever OK.
In response to Critical Mass, a group of bicyclists is starting an event called Courteous Mass at 6:30 p.m. on July 11. It also starts at Woodruff Park, but these bikers will be obeying the rules. According to the blog publicizing the event, "this ride isn't intended as a protest ... it's simply an experiment. And, of course, another chance to ride bikes!"
Copyright© 2008 The Atlanta Journal-Constitution
Delicious
Digg
StumbleUpon
Newsvine
Facebook
Google
Yahoo
Technorati
28 Comments so far
Show AllClemsy,
No, of course, there is nothing at all OBNOXIOUS about cars or drivers...
Have you noticed the spike in species extinction, the disruption of the climate, the wars over energy, the distortion of our political system by the interlocking directorates of the Oil and Auto companies...? And to repeat, the OVER ONE MILLION (fact) humans killed in car "accidents". But please do not address any obnoxious facts about cars, please direct your anger at a group of cyclists that is trying to call our collective attention to these horrors. Yeah, they are just so rude!
And of course, no one who drives is motivated by what you attribute to Critical Mass: "I have power. I can control you." Cars and their drivers (and their pavement and their industrial corporations) are just peacefully coexisting with the world, it's those cyclists who are - gasp! - rude!
You write: "Cars... are a fact of life. We live at a time when that fact will undergo some modifications."
"Some modifications", yes indeed. Ready for the ride of your life, fool?
webwalk,
Gimme a break. I'm talking about bikers who purposefully and intentionally refuse to give right of way. This isn't some grand demonstration. It's just plain and simple rudeness.
Like calling someone you don't know a fool.
Cars are not obnoxious. They are a fact of life. We live at a time when that fact will undergo some modifications. That's fine and necessary.
shokulan, yes the bikers do have room on the shoulder. In fact there's often a white line on the side of the road marking it with up to 3 feet to the side, yet some bikers won't move into it to get out of a cars way.
I can be very patient.... but rudeness stretches it a bit thin. What does this behavior say other than "I have power. I can control you."
I don't see Critical Mass as doing any different if all they're doing is inconveniencing strangers getting from point A to point B.
First I would like to say that I've been reading about more and more people using bikes to get around, whether to work do errands, and not just for fun or exercise. I try to ride a bike to run errands and to get around as much as I can, and I've bought a Prius recently, so I'm trying to do my part. It's also true that more and more people are taking public transportation, some bringing along their bikes to get to their final work destination, especially in cities with good systems; funny what $4.50 a gallon can do: we start to act like Europeans!
generallee reminds me of people I've talked to who are so concerned about the amount of batteries that might end up in dumps in the future if and when all autos are finally electric or hybrids: to which I always reply: they will be recycled, and what happens to old batteries in 100% gasoline-run autos now?
The environment certainly will be improved with more public transportation, more bicycle use, more people walking, and autos with zero emissions. So generalle, what's wrong with that? Maybe you think improving the environment and having any kind of ecological awareness is somehow un-American because you aren't wasting resources, as the average European uses up only a fraction of the energy of an average Amerikan. It takes some inventiveness and leaders at the top of the top who are willing to take on the American auto industry (who still don't get it, and are losing billions) oil conglomerates, the coal industry, the power industry; and city and county leaders who bend over backwards to get freeways widened instead of having bike lanes built and light rail systems built or expanded (this is what is happening in so-called liberal Santa Cruz County; a freeway widening project versus the other two!).
Toyota is going to put solar panels on the top of next year's Prius. Geez: what a great idea! How about a government mandate that all new construction require solar panels. To those who say solar won't work, like generalee probably thinks: Carnegie Mellon institute runs itself off the grid, on solar energy! The city of Watsonville has required new homes to have solar panels the last few years, and those people sell power back onto the grid (however, San Juan Capistrano outlaws solar panel use!)
How about mandating that all new autos and trucks be hybrids or electric. To generallee and anyone else who thinks this can't happen: it can (it's called re-tooling and investing for the long term), the technology exists, and it needs to be implemented, and the Japanese are smart enough to invent and implement! How about car-less days one work day a week. Then all the roads in all the major cities would be bike lanes!
Ronald White,
Danger lurks for all of us every day. People die just by falling out of bed.
Don't put the greats you have mentioned along with CM.
Pedal power is a great way to move about. I ride to work 3 days a week(32 miles round trip). That does not entitle you to any special privileges or make you "superior" over anyone else.
Please be careful how you throw that last statement of yours around...
The last refuge of a "law-abiding" reactionary is pseudo-compassion : "I know what's good for you , trust me"
It can just as easily be phrased:
The last refuge of a "law-breaking" progressive is pseudo-intellectualism: "I know what's good for you , trust me"
For some reason, police go nuts about Critical Mass, which is just a bunch of bicyclists. The police do the undercover thing, as if they were thwarting terrorists.
Bicyclists are supposed to ride to the right, but it's difficult when 200 bicycles take to the street.
I'm not sure how effective CM is. However, the need for class 1 bikeways and safe routes for bicyclists is important. Bike route planning seems mostly an afterthought in city planning.
Effectively, all public protests these days are nullified by our men and women in blue. They're just over-paid protectors of property rights poised to herd and arrest the public - however they show up (on foot or bicycle) to exercise their free speech rights. How did that come about?
The author of this article writes up the menace of CM a bit too much, I think. They are just bicyclists, using the streets they paid for.
"obnoxious"...
Automobiles are extremely "obnoxious", not to mention "noxious", and it is extremely predictable to see auto users whine about how horribly they are inconvenienced to have to wait for bicycles.
Meanwhile, the living Earth is writhing, the climate is disrupted, check this out OVER ONE MILLION HUMANS HAVE DIED IN CAR "ACCIDENTS". Know anyone who died or was maimed in a car "accident"?
Who's obnoxious, fool?
generallee: "Any fool thinking a bicycle and an 1/2 ton automoble can and should share the same busy city streets in the 21st century is a delusional jerk"
If autos weighed 1/2 ton they would get over 100 mpg and burn 1/4 the fossil fuel. They would represent less of a hazard to peds, bikes and to each other. Road maintenance would drop to a fraction. But today autos weigh from 2 to 4 tons and get 15 to 30 mpg. They are friggin tanks. God Bless the United States of America!
"...putting their life in danger."
To generallee : Who's life ? Your life ? If not , then it's really none of your business . You're just miffed because you probably sat in traffic .
"...putting their lives in danger" is what American automobile drivers do every day;complain about them.
"...putting their lives in danger" is what tobacco smokers do every day;rag on them.
"... putting their lives in danger" is what Wilberforce,Gandhi,Mendela,MLK.Medger Evers... did many days of their lives;deny that their "dangerous"efforts bore no fruit.
The last refuge of a "law-abiding" reactionary is psuedo-compassion : "I know what's good for you , trust me"
The issue with Critical Mass is that it is an example of a successful civilian movement promoting fair allocation of the resources for transit equally for pedestrians, bikers and all users, not just cars. The issue is that many CM rides are huge and exemplify successful protest in a disorganized chaotic but symbiotic manner. Across the USA and around the world the message from the elites in government has been to shut down and discredit the CM movement.
Here in San Francisco we have witnessed Government agents moving among bikers as false protesters to incite violence against cars and discredit the movement. They have been identified with video and still cameras and identified as agents, which is an illegal action. Furthermore, the arrests made here have literally all been thrown out and dismissed.
So it is clear that both, CM is powerful as an example of political action and that the Federal government is using sophisticated tactics to infiltrate and discredit the movement. Thankfully the peaceful activists have shown to be nearly invincible, correct and sympathetic characters while the violent and ill informed federal provocateurs have further discredited themselves and brought evidence that order for a policing role is another Big Lie.
Clemsy (July 8th, 2008 8:38 pm) said 'I also love biking, but really don't get the mentality of the biker who arrogantly hogs a narrow country road approaching the top of a hill forcing a driver to slow to 10 mph.
'Being obnoxious just pisses people off. Big accomplishment.'
Is it safe for a car to pass the bike at the top of that hill? Is there a safe shoulder (i.e. wide enough, free of debris) for the bike to use?
What is a minute or two delay, anyway? Even with a broken arm, it isn't life threatening--except maybe to the biker if the car hits the biker.
Besides, how many cars out there are also being obnoxious and pissing people off by running lights and stop signs, exceeding the speed limit, and disobeying traffic rules? Most of the road-rage out there is directed towards cars, not bikes.
Swaheal (July 8th, 2008 3:21 pm) said 'I give them all the room I can when they're in single file out where I live, but they do feel the breeze off my vehicle when they refuse to get over and stop impeding traffic.'
So, what if you misjudge the breeze and hit or kill the bicyclist?
Rules of the road for bikes include taking the lane when there is not enough room for a car to pass safely.
Inconveniencing people driving to work or grandma's or where ever is going to enlighten exactly who about what?
I can't help thinking of the day my kid broke his arm. What would I have done if I came upon such a thing? Gone postal?
I also love biking, but really don't get the mentality of the biker who arrogantly hogs a narrow country road approaching the top of a hill forcing a driver to slow to 10 mph.
Being obnoxious just pisses people off. Big accomplishment.
We have Critical Mass day once a month in our small city. It is generally non confrontational and often turns into more of a parade and celebration, (advantages of a relatively small community). But I also agree with Anne Faith, that arrogant cyclists who use a holier than thou attitude toward drivers only hurt the cause. I'm an avid cyclist (both road and mountain) and support the transition to more biking, but we ought not be pricks about it. I recently nearly ran over a biker who blew through a stop sign, and as my brakes squealed he turned and flipped me the finger. That ain't right.
Advocates for ride-able and walk-able cities have working for decades to achieve only minor successes.
Does the system change when you ask it nicely? Nope, never has.
Change must be demanded. This is what Critical Mass is doing.
I went on my first critical mass ride last Saturday in Vancouver. We had two thousand people! It is the job of the first riders in the group to "cork" intersections by walking ten or so bikes out to form a line and block traffic, then the five minute snake of bikes rolls through. A carnival atmosphere prevails. A lot of people get out of their cars and high-five cyclists. Kids stick up out of sunroofs and try to count them. Most people get that we are making a point about a commitment to a better world, however small and lame and way too late.
Too bad these bikers weren't all wearing "IMPEACH!" jerseys. Hey! Now there's an idea....
There is a movement in my state that (when passed) will have every bicycle that is traveling on rural and city streets needing to have a tall orange flag (just like they require for snowmobiles), mirror/s, and bright (hopefully white) flashing front and rear lights, and be licensed to help pay for the cost of adding bike lanes. I give them all the room I can when they're in single file out where I live, but they do feel the breeze off my vehicle when they refuse to get over and stop impeding traffic. I have 4 bicycles myself and still get off the road as my parents taught me when I have 2 opposing vehicles meeting.
Thanks anne faith. I agree. I love to bike, but I obey the traffic laws because I want to not be hit. If I don't obey the laws, why should the driver of a car? The point is not that they are zero carbon (really EXTREMELY low rather than zero considering the manufacturing) the point is that traffic laws apply to everyone that uses the road.
I'm sure I'll get slammed for saying this, but I don't appreciate it when bicyclists take over the road. I ride my bike quite a bit but I do so in a courteous way that doesn't block auto traffic. I stay to the side and/or ride on the grass and off the roadway, both for my own safety and so that I'm not blocking traffic.
I get really pissed off when bicyclists ride two or three abreast and block the roadway, as if they own the road. They don't. The roads are for both cars and bikes. If the point of this group is to persuade people to give up their emissions-spewing, gas guzzling cars and trucks and ride bikes instead, I don't believe this is an effective way to win recruits. Not if all you do is piss off drivers who are trying to get to work, school or whatever.
"Grow up. Environment? Please"…
Idiot...
Samson: Thanks for the George Carlin link – it brightened up my day.
I was recently watching a lot of George Carlin videos as a tribute. I loved the one he did on bicycles.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r6zj5nhASk0&feature=related
Two tickets for blowing red lights is a "crackdown"? Do they object to traffic laws? If they want to call this "civil disobedience", they should force the cops to ticket ALL of them.
generallee: wow... what a selfish first-world jerk. This sort of mindset is so stupid.
Why don't they just move to Holland? Any fool thinking a bicycle and an 1/2 ton automoble can and should share the same busy city streets in the 21st century is a delusional jerk, and putting their life in danger. I had a passion for bicycles, but not since I was twelve years old. Grow up. Environment? Please...
At a big intersection I make a right, then to the inside lane for a U-Turn across the oncoming lane; and than a right and proceed on.
I INTERFERE WITH NO ONE!
If they want me to follow the same rules as vehicles then I guess I own a lane and I'm taking it up; GO AROUND! I'm not riding the edge, I'm taking up the whole lane at 10-mph.
Oh yea every one of those bikes should individually stop too. Gotta follow the same rules as a vehicle? GREAT!
Did not have a permit to stop traffic???? Since when does a legal vehicle need a permit to be on the roads. Plus since a bike travels slower several bikes on the road would slow and stop traffic. What a joke.
hooray for the bike squad! whats next, making illegal large groups of pedestrians? oh, wait, they already have! "you need a permit for that", my response to that nonsense would be. "officer, we just happened to all be at the same place at the same time" "well you still need a permit" at that point i would say "but we are not an organized group with a decided leader, therefore no permit applies"
I want to get something like this going in my hometown. Just say to people, hey we all are going for a nice bike ride, wanna join?
Smart...criminalize people for promoting intelligent zero-emissions transportation. Go Atlanta!