EMAIL SIGN UP!
Most Popular This Week
- Picture of the Week
- 'The Gilded Age' Statistics Corporations Don't Want Workers, or Anyone, to See
- As Death Toll Rises Beyond 500, Garment Factory Disaster 'Worst in World History'
- Report: Toxic Chemicals Found in Thousands of Children's Products
- Bradley Manning is Off Limits at SF Gay Pride Parade, but Corporate Sleaze is Embraced
- Report: Toxic Chemicals Found in Thousands of Children's Products
- Move Over, Koch Brothers: A Bigger, Darker Rightwing Funder Is Out to Destroy Public Education
- You and Your Family Are Guinea Pigs for the Chemical Corporations
- The Life and Death of Words, People, and Even Nature
- After Boston, Eyes-Wide Open Hope?
Popular content
Today's Top News
Oilsands Image Fight Targets US Politicians
CALGARY - Alberta has launched a full-court press on U.S. lawmakers -- including camps of the two presidential candidates -- to sell the importance and sustainability of the oilsands before the province is backed into a corner.
Premier Ed Stelmach met Monday, following his annual Stampede breakfast, with U.S. Ambassador David Wilkins to work on having more American delegations visit Alberta and the oilsands.
The government hopes that targeting U.S. congressmen from both the Democrats and Republicans -- along with its ongoing multimillion-dollar public relations campaign -- will slay what it insists are misconceptions of Alberta's so-called "dirty oil."
"We will continue to work with Gary Mar (Alberta's representative in Washington) in our embassy office to see if we can reach out to the (presidential) candidates specifically," Stelmach told reporters at Calgary's McDougall Centre.
"There's all kinds of information flowing out there, but we want to get the correct information to the decision-makers and settle things down."
A series of campaigns in the U.S. -- including initiatives from Democratic and Republican presidential hopefuls Barack Obama and John McCain -- are threatening to stem the flow of oilsands and derived fuels south of the border.
American decision-makers are increasingly concerned about the environmental toll of extracting the tar-like sands -- which produces about three times as many greenhouse gas emissions as conventional oil.
"It's not about selling oil. It's about defending oil," Mar, Alberta's point man in Washington, said Monday in an interview.
The Stelmach government's campaign to defend the oilsands -- the second largest oil reserves on the planet -- is "very broad and very deep," he noted.
While Mar is still considering trying to arrange meetings with Obama and McCain to discuss Alberta's concerns, he said he'll concentrate for now on selling the province's message to their top advisers.
The government also has planned a series of U.S. delegations, including politicians and policy-makers, to visit the northern Alberta oilsands over the next few months.
"No doubt, at this time, it's important to try and convey your message to people who will ultimately have influence on the president of the United States," Mar said. "It will be critical to get in as quickly as you can with the new administration."
Democratic congressmen Tim Mahoney and Rick Boucher, chairman of the house Energy and Air Quality Subcommittee, last week toured the oilsands, and declared it "critically important" to the U.S.'s energy future.
The government also has invited a group of Washington-based energy news reporters to the Fort McMurray area for a first-hand look at the resource and briefing on its importance to the North American energy supply.
A delegation of energy advisers to congressmen also is scheduled to visit Alberta in the near future, as is a group of think-tanks, which often craft the policies of U.S. lawmakers.
Those efforts, along with promoting stronger ties with state governments -- which are closely linked to the federal parties -- is part of the Stelmach government's U.S. blitz.
Yet, it will be the American public -- which is already well informed on energy issues -- and not the politicians who ultimately determine which way to go on the oilsands and environment, argued Chris Sands, an expert in Canada-U.S. relations at the Washington-based Hudson Institute.
© The Calgary Herald 2008
Comments
Note: Disqus 2012 is best viewed on an up to date browser. Click here for information. Instructions for how to sign up to comment can be viewed here. Our Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines. Note to Readers: Spam Filter May Capture Legitimate Comments...

28 Comments so far
Show AllExpensive. Dirty. Unsustainable. An ecological nightmare.
What else is there to say? Big Oil continues to shove filth down our compliant throats. The destruction to Alberta by this product is extensive and has worldwide implications with its contribution to greenhouse gases. I'd provide a link but a simple Google search will tell all.
Next catastrophe for compacent Americans: Oil Shale
http://www.alcoholcanbeagas.com?bid=2&aid=CD8&opt=
Oh great! Just what Canada needs at a moment when there's a distinct possibility of an expanded Middle East war closing off shipping channels. It's bad enough that NAFTA aready took away any possibility of a "made-for-Canada" policy on petro-resouces management. Now the Albertan oil patchers want to invite even more involvement by "U.S. lawmakers" and we all know where that leads. I wonder if those "U.S. advisors" to Iraq's oil ministry have found themselves with some spare time on their hands recently.
The process uses a lot of precious oil to make oil. They have to extract it from soaked sand.
This tells me oil really is getting harder to find.
Also that we are not looking for alternatives.
The Alberta Tar (Oil) Sands are a scam. With plans to build a nuclear power station to power the extraction, using equivalent to 40% of the energy that can be extracted, and then selling the extracted oil product to the US primarily for use by the Pentagon, this is a huge environmental disaster waiting to happen. Follow the money. How is Mr. Harper profiting from this deal? Bush? Cheney? The Albertans I know are outraged and disgusted.
Tar sands are the #1 polluter in the world. It has drained entire lakes to get water to make steam. It uses enough Natual Gas in a week to heat every home in Canada in winter for the winter. ( source CBC) Harper is a Bush wanabe so bad he is even looking more gay everytime he is on TV. VOTE LIBERAL CANADA
You may want to look at what is happening in South Dakota. Hyperion Energy is building an oil refinery in Union County - there is much controversy in the area regarding this project (just went up for vote). Based upon its location - I would say that they are building up for the refining duties from the oilsands of Canada. I think this is a done deal - and there are events happening under the radar that is already putting this plan in place. There are rumors, and only rumors, that Cheney has something to do with this project.
Alberta's oily sands are just as clean as America's Congressional hands. Out! Out, damn spot!
This is disinformation. Common Dreams should be ashamed to present such a misleading article. Only a handful of Native Peoples called (around the fort indians) support the extraction of oil from their lands. The overwhelming majority oppose oil extraction and refuse to endorse it. Native Peoples are blockading roads, staging sitins, occupying their own lands in large numbers in order to oppose development, and fighting in the courts to end genocide.
The Canadian Government employs the Canadian Army, Border Patrol, and the RCMP (Royal Canadian Mounted Police) to drive Indians off of their own land so that development can take place. Recently two of the most respected female Elders of the Mohawk Nation were roughed up by the police and one is still in the hospital suffering from a resultant heart attack.
The Government is illegally leasing Indian lands to oil, timber, and mining companies. They are enforcing these illegal leases at the point of a gun. It is continuing genocide pure and simple. This is your chance to oppose genocide by refusing to purchase Canadian goods. If you do otherwise you are as guilty as your ancestors were.
I provided Common Dreams with the name and contact information of the Elder who suffered the heart attack at the hands of the RCMP. She writes for Mohawk News and providers the truth of what is happening there. Common Dreams has chosen instead to provide this disinformation to provide to you instead. Reject this article, it is drivel.
I agree with Doom n Gloom. I've read a bit and seen pictures of the Alberta oil fields, which spans hundreds of square miles, basically a dead zone, free of any wildlife. Those that enter die -- it is an environmental disaster area. I guess nothing is off limits or sacred when it comes to profits, even in Canada.
The Calgary Herald is pravda for the Federal and Provincial conservative parties.
Doom and Gloom is spot-on.
" The United Nations Commission on Human Rights has found Canada in violation of article 27 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights They have repeated their call for Canada to take immediate action to avoid irreparable damage. This call was first made in 1990 and was repeated in 2003 and 2006. This struggle has been described in a book, Last Stand of the Lubicon Cree, by John Goddard"
from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lubicon
About a month ago our CBC news gave us a report about a small band near the tar sands bringing a court action to stop an expansion of water use by a tar sands extraction company. The chief of the band was given some tv time giving examples of the cancer bloom and other health problems his people were experiencing because of the growth of this extraction, and the fouling of the waters.
At the same time, the federal cabinet, behind closed doors, okayed that water use expansion. This was within days, maybe hours, of the ballyhooed apology in the House of Commons for the mistreatment of Aboriginals in the residential school system.
The chief's appearance and bearing on national tv was to me an example of indigenous people everywhere: a simple, plain spoken man, exuding basic decency, determined to try on behalf of his people, yet fully aware, thru years of experience, just how much the corporate world/justice system/political milieu was stacked against him and his community.
So the provincial premier is basically acting as a shill for the oil companies. I guess some things are just the same in the great used-to-be-white north.
I have done more then seen the pictures. I lived up there. My family moved up there when there was only one Oil Plant called GCOS producing 50,000 BBL a day and the road there all gravel.
I made many visits to the plant and the enviromental destruction was not that bad in those early years.
The difference between then and now is exponential. The entire region where the Plants are is like a great moonscape. This was once wooded areas of muskeg, hills and small lakes now all gone. The Rivers have been used past all capacity to sustain more growth , toxic pools of tailings and sludge are everywhere.
It is IMHO the single greatest destruction of the enviroment I have ever seen and they want to expand that, using the same techniques several fold.
I really do not see how Stelmach is going to spin this but I suspect this will happen.
The spin Stelmach gives will be enough as far as the US Politicians are concerned. They can go back to their constituents and tell them that "The Premier of Alberta promises he is committed to protecting the Enviroment"
That it is simply PR and not a reflection of the truth will be all that matters.
The only time real attention is directed towards what happens up there is when there IS a major event. As in the recent flock of hundreds of ducks that landed on a tailing pond and all died. We saw a flurry of investigations and grave concern reflected by teh Alberta Government. All of it spin and meaningless. This sort of stuff happens all the time and this was one of the few times it was reported just because of the number of birds affected. I have absolutely no faith whatsoever in the current Governments desire to protect the enviroment in Alberta.
PK
He has no choice. He's looking down the road. We can talk green all we want, but modern militaries run on oil. Priority one, first and foremost.
This oil is probably 20 or 30 years out from start point.
History teaches one lessen over and over. The dominant military always dominates the discussion.
My sad prediction... both houses pass legislation.
""It's not about selling oil. It's about defending oil,""
"There's all kinds of information flowing out there, but we want to get the correct information to the decision-makers and settle things down."
Information flow to Congress: When you come to visit our oil sands, be sure to bring an extra-large briefcase to carry home the "correct" information we'll be dispensing to you "decision-makers"!
Would you prefer to take this information home in Euros or Ameros?
In its infant days we called this oil patch area by its actual name - the Tar Sands. Oil Sands just sounds so much "cleaner" doesn't it? The industry reps, Conservative Party politicos and officials and all right wing enthusiasts prefer "Oil Sands". It is all about image. :)
Having said that, this kind of production requires tremendous amounts of energy (heat)to convert the bitumen into something that can flow. Natural gas is the energy source of choice for now but nuclear will have to be an option if they don't proceed with the Mackenzie Delta gas project. This kind of oil production has an EROEI of about 1.5 to 2 barrels produced for every barrel equivalent of energy used in production. I'm sure as technology improves, so will this ratio. There is no way they can produce 4 million barrels per day of this stuff by 2015-2020 without some massive changes and improvements in technology.
Even if the tar-sand oil could be produced cleanly, it shouldn't be done because the oil itself is the pollutant!
How can we possibly reign in carbon emissions unless we leave the carbon IN THE GROUND!
Yes, indeed, these are Tar Sands. Oil Sands, great idea. At least for people from Alberta. Alberta is only part of Canada because of it's latitude, geographically speaking. They don't want to be part of Canada, and quite frankly, most of Canada wouldn't miss them if they rushed off to join the reddest of the red states.
Given this little rant that shows how disenchanted I am with the current generation of Albertans, I can go on to say how hard I would laugh if the Americans took some kind of stand against their filthy Tar-Mining. After the Albertans went and hawked themselves up to the eyeballs buying every conceivable fancy machine to rape and pillage the crap out of the earth by the time the ink hits the paper for the next quarterly report.
We need to get better sources of energy, not just to save the planet, but so we can laugh at Albertans with all their eggs in the same basket - Oil that is so filthy and energy-intensive to get, that it can't be sold to anyone. Yay!
NMBill- the stuff they pull out of the TARSANDS is semisolid bitumen. Coal that failed to cook and harden properly.
To make it flow like real oil Syncrude has to be heavily mixed with naphtha, a petroleum derivative.
And the cancer rate in Ft. MacMurray is 400 times higher than the rest of Canada. No, that is NOT a typo.
Finding more oil is like building more highways. There will never be enough.
Even when the planet is dying from the burden of the gimmie gimmie gimmie human syndrome we can't stop. We are literally out of control. No drug was ever so insidious as the attempt to fill our God-shaped hole with material things.
I remember Micky Mantle telling us on TV that the doctor had told him he would die if he took one more drink. It was already too late for him to stop.
It's OK. They will use this oil up. Up the CO2. Burn the planet. The day will come when they go over the edge that no-one may cross. Hope you got your Rapture tickets all paid up. 100 years? 200? I don't know how long it will take, but it will come.
These people are as insane as Cheney and friends.
I came across this blog about a month ago, and the comments are piling up, largely from Canadians and Albertans:
http://www.desmogblog.com/report-alberta-oil-sands-most-destructive-project-on-earth
This was the most disgusting part for me:
- At least 90% of the fresh water used in the oil sands ends up in tailing ponds so toxic that propane cannons are used to keep ducks from landing in them.
One person actually argued that this was humane for the ducks, as if they were actually trying to help them. The fact of the matter is that if they didn't have the propane cannons, every duck that landed in the toxic ponds would sink to the bottom and it would be like a black hole of death. It is all PR. We are being sold (by people who pretend to be serious, important people) the ending of the world.
Enough! Enough already!
it is time for every freedom loving individual to come together to fight multinationals at every turn. that means whatever you can do to stop funding to the "great satan", that is modern day western culture.
V for Vendetta, watch it, its a good movie. Ed Stelmach will feel the wrath, I Will incarnate till they get it. I dont care if it takes a hundred thousand years. We will have our vengence. after the atrocities of these sick oil barrons. its only just comeupance. see you there.
This whole discussion is besides the point. If we found surface oil pooled up the size of Lake Michigan, it wouldn't change the underlying fact: unless humanity stops burning carbon-based fuels this species will die out. Oil HAS to be over. Coal is over. And we'd better get it through our thick skulls and fast.
Look at asthma rates in our kids. That's pollution cause by burning fossil fuel. How about the seas turning acidic? Fossil fuels. Mercury in our water, the fish? Burning coal. Of course we've got catastrophic climate change...on and on and on. It doesn't matter if oil was freaking free. If we keep burning these fuels, we die. Simple.
PS. there is NO SUCH THING as "clean coal."
CNN just did a puff piece praising the 'oilsands', saying that it was wonderful that the 22 year old interview was making $100 000 a year.
It said nothing, NOTHING about the massive environmental damage. Or the FACT that the cancer rate in Ft. MacMurray (or 'Ft. McMoney' as CNN called it) is 400 TIMES HIGHER than the rest of Canada.
CNN said nothing about the fact that it takes more energy to produce a barrel of Syncrude than you get out as end product.
Lies, lies, lies, lies.
When the REAL oil crunch comes, and the world and US economies collapse in flames, I will be laughing my ass of at the blind, deliberate, raging stupidity of the average 'Murican!
"NMBill- the stuff they pull out of the TARSANDS is semisolid bitumen. Coal that failed to cook and harden properly."
Actually, tar sand they are former oil-bearing sand formations which have been brought to the surface by uplift/erosion and lost all the lighter more volatile hydrocarbons found in light crude.
Coal is formed from plant matter in peat-bogs which gets deeply buried under sediments and broken down and reduced to carbon.
>>It said nothing, NOTHING about the massive environmental damage. Or the FACT that the cancer rate in Ft. MacMurray
The cancer rate is NOT 400 times higher. There are indications it higher and good evidence of such provided by doctors but it is certainly not 400 times higher. Were such the case everyone living there or that has lived there would have cancer several times over.
Once the Athabasca River has been totally poisoned, those doing the poisoning should be forced to enjoy a tall, cool glass of OIL!