Subscribe to Common Dreams News Updates
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
Google Ordered to Hand Over Millions of YouTube User Details to Viacom
Google must hand over the personal details of anyone who has ever watched a video on YouTube, a US judge has ruled.
'An Inconvenient Truth' has been viewed 1.5bn times on YoutubeThe order will come as a surprise to millions of people who have used the video sharing site to view footage of TV shows, films, sports events, music clips and home videos.
Figures show that in April alone more than 130 million people across the world visited YouTube including 11.6 million in the UK. The judgment is part of an ongoing legal battle between the internet giant, which owns YouTube, and Viacom, which owns Paramount Pictures and MTV Networks.
Viacom accuses Google of allowing millions of users to illegally post and watch clips of its TV shows and films, such as South Park, on the popular video-sharing site, and is trying to build evidence that suggests that the sharing of illegal material on YouTube is the cornerstone of its business.
Google must now hand over a "user log" to Viacom. The log will contain users' YouTube log-in details, the IP address of their computer - a unique code that identifies individual machines - plus details of all the video clips that users have viewed.
The judgment, which was made on Wednesday, could apply worldwide, and affect more than four million registered YouTube users, as well as potentially those who have simply watched clips. Internet freedom campaigners have criticised the decision, with the Electronic Frontier Foundation calling it a "setback" for online privacy rights.
Viacom believes that YouTube has illegally hosted copyrighted material from a variety of shows, and claims that the internet has led to "an explosion of copyright infringement" on YouTube and other video-sharing sites. It said that the Al Gore documentary, An Incovenient Truth, had been viewed 1.5 billion times on YouTube.
However, Google argues that it already far exceeds "its legal obligations in assisting content owners to protect their works", and that Viacom's $1 billion (£500 million) lawsuit is a threat to internet freedom.
Google, which bought YouTube for $1.65 billion (£820 million) in 2006, said that it abided by the rules of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act, which states that as long as sites such as YouTube remove copyright content as soon as it is brought to their attention, they are protected by law from prosecution.
But Viacom argues that YouTube has done "little or nothing" to stem the flow of copyrighted material, and the company said it had identified more than 150,000 unauthorised clips of its content on the video-sharing site.
However, the US court that made the ruling said that privacy concerns raised by the judgment were purely "speculative". A spokesman for Viacom played down fears that personal information would be shared and that user logs would be used to prosecute YouTube users.
"Only our legal team will have access to this data," he said.
"We will not be using to go after individuals."
Google welcomed the restrictions the court placed on the use of the logs. "We are pleased the court put some limits on discovery, including refusing to allow Viacom to access users' private videos and our search technology," said Catherine Lacavera, a member of Google's legal team.
"We are disappointed the court granted Viacom's overreaching demand for viewing history. We will ask Viacom to respect users' privacy and allow us to anonymize the logs before producing them under the court's order."
© Copyright of Telegraph Media Group Limited 2008



8 Comments so far
Show AllAmericans have willingly given up endless rights, our privacy, our minds, our humanity, our abilty to belief in ourselves as "more able." Americans are mind controlled by media whores, corporate whores, political whores in every party and religious/spiritual whores in every vain!
Youtube is another form of whoredom. I have no belief that Google/Youtube really cares about protecting privacy, but will claim to be concerned with privacy issues for "public con-sumption."
This is serious "setback", I would use a stronger word. Viacom is alreadly one of the companies being granted immunity for selling out American citizens to the NeoCons. Do you think that they wouldn't do it again? There's a lot of entertainment or just plain garbage on YouTube. However, it is also an avenue to propagate important content for those of us fighting for a more democratic world.
If Google (and Windows etc.) were not collecting extensive user data, there would be no dilemma. Why were they catalogueing everyone who looked at a video? I want an explanation of why they have to keep this data!! Including some kind of ID as well as IP ???
Google - if the White House can lose millions of emails, can't you lose this data??? If not I plan to make a project out of learning how to spoof my IP address and otherwise hide my identity. This takes the cake.
I had just posted on the site re;embedded journalists, CaseyJPorter stuff. I know he is in IVAW, served there and now goes over, or maybe , no because some of it was while it was happening, anyway his shit is great. I don't know what they're after. Every damn thing anyone has photographed EVER, since YouTube has been used Politically, I suppose.
Shit, I missed that, jclientelle. Id, IP address AND computer serial #'s? No way this is what it is, yet it is.
Sorry Turce - I misread. It is not stated that they are collecting serial numbers, just IP's. I suppose if you want to look at YouTube you should go to the library.
"The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized."
A viewer's IP address has no relevance to the suit whatsoever.
The judge needs to be impeached.
I'm glad I was copying and pasteing the article, I noticed about serial #'s. I forwarded to my Vet buddies cos one just did a mash up of a video he took today at Independence Hall, I thought it was Thursday yesterday so I missed it all, and it's posted on YouTube already. I forwarded him the article anyway, he'll need it.
What is the status on jailing all the Viacom executives for illegal wiretapping of their customers? ...and where is my $1000 reparation?