Obama Supports Supreme Court Reversal of Gun Ban
Barack Obama intensified his campaign to appeal to voters on the life-and-death issues of the American heartland yesterday by stepping away from his past support for gun control.
In the latest in a series of policy reversals for the Democratic presidential candidate, Obama came out in support of yesterday's supreme court decision overturning a gun ban in the city of Washington that had been a model for fighting urban crime.
He had previously supported the Washington ban, the strictest in the US.
It was the second time in 24 hours that Obama had shifted towards a more conservative position. On Wednesday, he took issue with the supreme court for striking down the death penalty for cases of child rape that do not involve murder.
In yesterday's decision, judges struck down Washington's 32-year-old gun ban by a five-to-four margin, saying it was incompatible with the second amendment of the constitution. "Whatever the reason, handguns are the most popular weapon chosen by Americans for self-defence in the home, and a complete prohibition of their use is invalid," the conservative Justice Antonin Scalia said. However, the judges defended the need for firearm bans in schools and public buildings.
Immediately after the ruling Obama and the Republican candidate, John McCain, both sought to exploit one of the most emotive political issues. McCain tried to revive charges that Obama was out of step with smalltown values. Obama ran into controversy last April for telling a fundraiser that Americans in small towns clung to guns and religion out of bitterness.
"Unlike the elitist view that believes Americans cling to guns out of bitterness, today's ruling recognises that gun ownership is a fundamental right - sacred, just as the right to free speech and assembly," McCain said.
Obama, chastened by that controversy, tried to keep to a narrow line between hunters and gun enthusiasts and urban areas desperate to fight street crime. "Today's decision reinforces that if we act responsibly, we can both protect the constitutional right to bear arms and keep our communities and our children safe." His carefully phrased comments were seen as a sign of his shift towards the centre before November's election.
On Wednesday Obama, once a critic of the death penalty, opposed the decision to strike down Louisiana's death penalty for child rape not involving murder. "I think that the rape of a small child, six or eight years old, is a heinous crime and if a state makes a decision that under narrow, limited, well-defined circumstances the death penalty is at least potentially applicable, that that does not violate our constitution," he told a press conference.
The hard line was seen at variance with comments in his memoir that the death penalty was not a deterrent to crime. As an Illinois state senator he had opposed the death penalty for gang murders.
Earlier this week, Obama reversed his opposition to a bill to legalise the Bush administration's wiretapping programme. Last week, he reneged on a promise to uphold the public campaign finance system put in place after Watergate. And earlier this month, he was even more forceful than the Bush administration or the Israeli government in support of the Jewish state's territorial claims to Jerusalem.
"He ran to the left to get nominated, and he is running back to the centre in the general election," said Larry Sabato, a politics expert at the University of Virginia. "You can call it flipflopping, or you can call it readjusting, or you can call it determined to win."
© 2008 The Guardian
Delicious
Digg
StumbleUpon
Newsvine
Facebook
Google
Yahoo
Technorati
17 Comments so far
Show AllI don't understand all of this fuss about GUNs, just let them be.
All we need now to do is make the _ c a r t r i d g e s _ ( & bullets) illegal.
We could call it the "Barney Fife Law".
Namaste
I 'aint no fan of guns now. I don't own one and don't want one. Bush has nothing to do with it. In fact, if anything I want them legal so as to put that bastard in front of a firing squad along with his criminal colleagues.
Its sooo nice to see most of you lefties are now on the right side of the gun issue.
Eight years of Bush HAS had a few positives!
L I T T L E _ B R O T H E R
I agree wholeheartedly with you.
Just as the sage advise to "___know___thyself___" is in scant relation to cataloging one's possessions ( being of the formless inner universe of consciousness & spirit ), I similarly conclude that:
"___Arm___thyself___" is a challenge to invoke deep mastery of attention and intention, like described here.
Namaste « Presence »
« We must be the change we wish to see in the world » — Gandhi
« There is a sufficiency in the world for man's need but not for man's greed » — Gandhi
« We adopt the means of nonviolence because our end is a community at peace with itself » — ML King
As one who is admittedly not enthralled by firearms, I cannot credit the popular justification that ordinary citizens need firearms more than EVER-- not only to deter and meet retail violence from individual criminals, but to resist government military and law enforcement actions if and when our nation deteriorates further into an authoritarian police state.
Even without researching the tasty and expensive firepower that might wind up in the personal arsenal of watchful citizens, it is in my view preposterous to believe that citizens would prevail in a violent revolution against present-day totalitarian forces, however warranted.
If there are indeed organized militias and cadres training and equpping themselves with sophisticated weaponry, the kind of insurgency that arose in Iraq after the US hegemony's illegal and immoral military invasion and occupation may arise in the US.
But the results are far likelier to resemble Ruby Ridge or Waco than a long war of attrition. To believe otherwise, even with respectful consideration of the broadly similar mismatch in our War of Independence, is folly.
My sense is that such Last Stands will more closely resemble Custer's-- or the endings portrayed in the classic films "Bonnie and Clyde", or "Butch Cassidy and the Sundance Kid". Being armed to the teeth, and brave or cold-blooded enough to practice armed combat, doesn't assure a favorable outcome.
If the fallback position is that in any event, it's better to die on one's feet than live on one's knees, that's another issue.
I used to be for banning guns in the US. I travel in Europe where people do not have guns for the most part, and if they did they'd be killing each other in the streets, not just at rugby games. BUT the US rogue government has caused me to reconsider the need for ordinary citizens to be able to defend themselves.
And people wonder why I am ambivalent about Obama. The man is all about compromise. Not that I am totally anti-gun. I don't think most gun owners are trigger-happy loons and can understand why people would feel they need to own one. I am also concerned that a total gun ban will create an illegal market as drug prohibition has done. On the other hand, if we could somehow throw all the guns into the heart of the sun, you wouldn't hear me complaining.
Secondly, I certainly don't sympathize with those who would rape children. Call me an imperfect liberal, but as long as those people aren't walking the streets, I don't care if they live or die. However, I do recognize that there are flaws with the death penalty, and that there should at least be a moratorium on that practice. Like with guns, if we were to get rid of the death penalty, I wouldn't gripe about that either.
What troubles me though, is that we see this chameleon aspect with Obama. He talks about bringing forth positive change, but how can you do that if you're playing both sides of the fence. He's akin to Bill Clinton. He wants the Left and the Right to like him equally, and that's not going to be the case if he truly wants to to enact the reform needed to better this country and the world. Getting hawkish with the Middle East isn't going to end conflict in that part of the world. Allowing wiretapping and other such invasions of privacy which shrink our civil liberties isn't going to protect us from terrorists.
That's not all Obama has shifted on, and I can only wonder what other positions he will modify in an attempt to get elected and make everyone happy.
The Audacity of Getting Our Hopes Up.
I wish this gun control thing wasn't even associated with the left. Just gives the right ammunition (hehe). I won't get into it here, but suffice it to say gun control doesn't work, and let's move on and do what the left should be doing: fighting the cause of crime -- as in, poverty and social injustice.
With all the horrible shit Obama has been doing, this is hardly something we should be complaining about (besides that child rape/death penalty thing).
I'm all for gun rights! The bigger gun the better! And I'm against Obama on the no death penalty for rape also. Why should we give the state one more thing to not get right!
"A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed."
Why did the authors not write it this way?
"Firearms, being necessary to the personal security of a free people, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed."
Why didn't they say it simply, like the First Amendment?
"Congress shall make no law infringing upon the right of the people to keep and bear arms."
Why, why, why did they say anything at all about Free States and Militia if it weren't important to the meaning of the amendment?
Justice Scalia's ego is larger than the Capitol Dome. He never passes up a chance to put his name in the history books... the law and the nation be damned.
He is precisely what the Republicans keep warning us about... an "Activist Judge".
FINALLY...A DEMOCRATIC CANDIDATE THAT UNDERSTANDS....FIRST AND FOREMOST..THE CONSTITUTION...AND..YOU CANNOT "CHERRY PICK THE AMENDMENTS"..FINALLY..THE DEMS HAVE BEEN LOSING THE "HEARTS AND MINDS"...FOR DECADES...THE GUN HATERS ARE THE EQUIVELANT OF THE ABORTION FOES ON THE REPUG SIDE...A NASTY BUNCH OF CHERRY PICKERS WHO ARE NOT FOR ACTUAL "RIGHTS" BUT FOR WHAT THEY SEE AS "RIGHTS"...
IT DON'T WORK THAT WAY...FINALLY..WAY TO GO OBAMA...NOW IF YOU COULD ONLY PULL YOUR HEAD OUT OF YOUR ASS ON THE 4TH WE WOULD BE BACK IN BUSINESS...YOU IDIOT..BUT..OKAY..WAY TO GO ON THE 2ND..GOOD MAN..FINALLY..A DEM GET'S THIS ONE RIGHT..JEEZIS..TOOK EM LONG ENOUGH...
AND ALL YOU BASHERS..HEY..DON'T HATE THE PLAYER..HATE THE GAME..AND TRY TO RECALL..YOUARE PAYING FOR EVERY MINUTE OF THE WAR..THE SURVIELLANCE..THE TORTURE...ALL OF IT..SO..LOOK IN THE MIRROR BEFORE CASTING A WIDE NET OF BLAME...NO EXCUSES..YOU PAY...YOU PLAY...
LIVE FREE OR DIE..
This decision and Obama's comments on it are not a proper occasion for bashing him. The Supreme Court (through its five coincidental Catholics banded together) has spoken on this handgun matter and Obama did not either cause nor thwart what it decided.
The irony of the Supreme Court ruling is that both sides were "correct!" The way I understand our constitution is that it does not specifically allow nor specifically forbid individuals to own "arms". Hence the Court should never have taken the case and that is what Senator Obama should have said. What he did say shows that he is just another arrogant lawyer who believes that the Constitution was written for him to explain it to me. Sorry Barack, I do not need your disgusting legalistic tinkering. I am sufficiently intelligent to read the "Bill of Rights" without your help which is exactly what the framers intended.
One of the multitude of other actions by "we the people" which our constitution neither forbids nor demands is "gay marriage". Hey, Obama, you Giant of Lawyers, I hope you will keep your addled brain away from that one but I doubt that you will because you will have to distance yourself publicly from your friend Jim Wallis.
Obama is starting to look like the Phantom of the Opera who just pulled off his mask.
Or you can call it "Change You Can Believe In" because nothing changes when new officials are elected, and thats something i can believe in
Or you can call it a death wish.
...or you can call it determined to keep America safe from those terrorists.