US in Dire Need of Home Improvement
Floods ravage the Midwest, as the hodgepodge system of levees is overwhelmed. Twenty-four are dead; damage is estimated at $15 billion and counting. The cost to food supplies has yet to be felt.
A bridge falls in Minneapolis, killing 13 people. A 100-year-old sewage valve explodes in Manhattan, terrorizing residents and shutting down much of lower Manhattan. And New Orleans still hasn't recovered from Katrina.
America is literally falling apart. Our infrastructure is old, outmoded and wearing out. Roads, bridges, waters and sewage systems, the electric grid, broadband, airports, public schools -- all have staggering unmet needs. America has become a place of private wealth and public squalor.
The American Society of Engineers estimates that the United States will need to invest $1.6 trillion over five years to bring our infrastructure up to sensible standards. That's "trillion" with a T. The Congressional Budget Office estimates that, on water systems alone, the annual spending gap today is about $19.4 billion for infrastructure modernization, and $18.1 billion in operations and maintenance.
This is a national emergency. The disrepair and decrepitude of our public systems isn't simply aggravating; it is massively costly. Schools in disrepair make children think we don't care about their education. Crowded roads in disrepair cost Americans hours from their families or their work and rack up millions in damage to cars and bodies. Inefficient transport and communications makes American business less competitive in the global economy. If we want to maintain a high-wage economy, we have no choice but to sustain a modern infrastructure, a world-class education system and robust public research and development.
In 2000, the United States was celebrating a budget surplus. It was a time to make significant investments in our infrastructure and our people. Instead, Bill Clinton -- beleaguered by the Gingrich Congress -- called for paying down the national debt, at the time lower as a percentage of GDP than any other industrial nation. George Bush, of course, called for massive tax cuts, skewed primarily to the already wealthy. Bush won the election; the Democratic majorities in Congress bowed to his wishes.
Instead of building modern public schools, safe levees and bridges, or durable water and sewage systems, the money went disproportionately to the second yacht, the larger mansion, the private jet of the wealthiest Americans who were already pocketing most of the rewards of economic growth. Then came Iraq, and what Nobelist Joseph Stiglitz estimates will be about $3 trillion squandered in a war that should never have been fought.
For conservatives, this was a conscious and purposeful set of choices. They wanted to "starve the beast" of the federal government. They believed that top-end tax cuts would generate growth and the benefits would trickle down to others. They believed that Iraq would be a "cakewalk." Led by President Bush, the Republican Congress simply squandered the money without coming close to making the investments we need.
This is one of many challenges that the next president will inherit. The next president would be wise to stop spending $12 billion a month in Iraq and start spending it here at home. Speak frankly to Americans about the scope and depth of our needs; augment federal funds with loan guarantees to mobilize pension fund assets. And lay out a major program to rebuild America.
Or alternatively, we can pay far more because of washed-out communities, collapsed bridges, grid-locked citizens, badly educated students and workers, and corporations finding it increasingly hard to compete.
--Jesse Jackson
© Copyright 2008 Digital Chicago, Inc
Delicious
Digg
StumbleUpon
Newsvine
Facebook
Google
Yahoo
Technorati
15 Comments so far
Show AllDuring one confrontation, in which the police tried to take Curry's camera away from him, the police threatened to "lock him up" if he didn't stop filming and give them his camera. Curry refused. Another time the police pushed Curry around to where they broke his microphone. Again, Curry refused to surrender his camera.
What mainstream media –The New York Times, The Newark Star-Ledger, the New Jersey television stations – were reluctant to do, that is to say, expose longtime machine boss Sharpe James for the antidemocratic, political thug he was, Marshall Curry (this, amazingly enough, being his first documentary) did with his commitment, his courage and his integrity.
At one political rally, a Booker supporter, wearing a Booker for Mayor cap, was accused by Mayor James of being a "terrorist." This was the same rally at which James lunged at a Booker supporter, a lawyer no less, and tried to physically assault him.
The strong-arm tactics used by James operatives – that Mayor James was fully aware of – were carried out by the police, by housing authority personnel and by building code inspectors. Newark was, in effect, King James' kingdom for 16 years and you dare not cross him.
Death threats were made against Booker and, after a while filmmaker Curry asked one of Booker's campaign workers if *he* should be afraid. Yes, said the campaign worker, telling Curry that a couple nights earlier someone smashed down his front door and that since then he was carrying a gun.
On Election Day, Newark police took down Booker posters; power outages mysteriously occurred at voting locations favorable to Booker; and James' operatives arranged for people who lived in Philadelphia to be bussed into Newark, where they were paid to vote, illegally, for Sharpe James.
NOTE: Booker – who is Stanford and Yale-educated and who was also a Rhodes scholar as well as an All-American/All-Academic football player – for several years and while running for mayor lived in Newark's Central ward in one of the projects: a neighborhood awash in drugs and crime, unpatrolled by the police and mired in generational poverty. … By contrast, during his four-terms as mayor Sharpe James voted his annual salary up from $70,000 in 1986 to $200,000 in 2002 – more than the governor of New Jersey made, and more than any other mayor in the United States made. James also has a 46-foot yacht and two vacation homes.
This then is the lowlife political thug Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton supported for mayor of Newark in 2002 – Jackson calling Cory Booker, "a sheep in wolf's clothing." Wow, talk about ironic! Talk about "The Big Lie."
One can only assume that Maritn Luther King, Jr., Malcolm X and Medgar Evers are all rolling over in their graves. Shame on you, Jesse Jackson. Shame on you.
But this is hardly "breaking news." Jesse Jackson sold out, long ago, to Corporate America. The Right Reverend is comfortably in bed with the multinational corporatists who have raped the planet and corrupted political systems the world over, the United States most prominent among them. In supporting political thugs such as Sharpe James, Jackson shows himself to be far from a progressive, but is rather instead a quisling, a defender of the status quo and an opportunist of the worst kind.
Jesse, you've come a long way, baby. There was a time when any progressive would have been proud to march with you. Now you're nothing but a transparent phony.
Congratulations, Jesse, you're now part of the problem.
Jesse Jackson is a phony!
If anyone doubts that statement, take a look at the political documentary "Street Fight." (I got it from my local public library).
"Street Fight" is an Academy Award-nominated documentary by Marshall Curry that tells the story of the 2002 mayoralty election in Newark, New Jersey. The two candidates who squared off in this nonpartisan election – both Democrats and both African-Americans – were Sharpe James, the four-term incumbent, and Cory Booker, the 32-year-old challenger.
Each candidate had various "celebrity endorsements": Cory Booker was supported by notables such as Spike Lee and Cornel West; while Sharpe James was supported by Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson – the Fric and Frac of political phonies.
What sort of a campaign did Sharpe James run? What kind of mayor was he?
Well, during the course of the campaign, Sharpe James called Cory Booker: a Jew (which he isn't) … a Republican (which he isn't) … a gay (which he isn't) … someone who had the support of the Klu Klux Klan! (which, obviously, he didn't!) … someone who had 10 million dollars in campaign money when, in fact, Booker had only 3 million dollars in campaign money … and someone who, according to James, wasn't "black enough" to be mayor, Booker being a light-skinned black and Yale and Stanford-educated.
But that's not *nearly* how dirty a campaign Sharpe James ran. … James used various forms of blackmail and physical force to try to intimidate Booker supporters. For example, if a Newark storeowner displayed a "Booker For Mayor" poster in his shop, James would get the Building Code Department to go to the business and shut them down, citing some minor code violation.
But it wasn't just Newark shop owners and businessmen James tried to intimidate. Filmmaker Curry interviewed a policeman who after he expressed support for Booker was reassigned to an extremely dangerous neighborhood.
And so if you did something as fundamentally democratic as displaying a "Booker for Mayor" poster in your shop window … or if a restaurant owner dared to host a Booker fund raiser … or if you simply verbally expressed support for Cory Booker – Mayor James would use his power to, as one person put it, "make your life impossible."
One woman who was interviewed by Curry who lives in the projects was afraid to display a "Booker for Mayor" poster for fear that she'd lose her public housing.
Curry himself was told by James' plainclothes police thugs that he couldn't film James giving as campaign speech. Why? Because James and his police thugs knew that Curry was also filming Booker's campaign, and the contrast between the two campaigns would be obvious to anyone viewing Curry's film. In short, only campaign lackeys were allowed media access to Mayor James.
(Continued)
Star Wars can surely save us. Vote Cold War 08
"Chomsky: US public irrelevant"
Well, no wonder nothing works...
http://english.aljazeera.net/news/americas/2008/06/2008624202053652281.html
I'm not going to join the South Korea "he said/she said." What I will comment on is the sorry state of affairs in my country. Yes out infrastructure is crumbling, our schools are failing and we spend trillions of dollars on wars of vanity and greed. Carnivore capitalism reigns supreme in the good ol' U.S of A. And the dirty little secret: trickle down is a lie. We are seeing the collective wealth of this country transfer at a fucking surreal rate from the vast majority to the tinest minority. Here's another dirty secret: the Congress of the United States does NOT answer to you or any other citizen. The Congress of the United States is owned lock, stock and oil barrell. Your government does NOT serve your interests, not unless you are part of the Texas-American Petroleum Mafia or the Military Industrial Complex.
Our measurement system is another part of our archaic infrastructure. What future can a country have in the world community when it steadfastly clings to an inane measurement system (even most of it's engineers) that none of the world uses.
Thank you Jesse for this article. Is so true. While the Repubs and/or lame Congress are enabling a war of aggression, our country is falling apart. Our leaders are not taking care of the people of this country. We need leaders that actually care about this country.
I've taught English in South Korea and it sucks. Classes are WAY overcrowded. ALL education is PRIVATE. There are NO public schools.
Everything comes down to PROFIT.
There is NO system of "special needs" classes for disabled students. I often times had to deal with children who did not belong in a classroom with "normal" kids.
I found the employers that hire english teachers from foreign countries are often times dishonest regarding hours and wages. This is simply because there is no way a foreigner can actually "enforce" the contract they are forced to sign in order to work.
It's mandatory to register with the public office of your arrival, employer, and residence within 60 days of your arrival. Most employers don't tell you this and they let the time expire, thereby avoiding taxes and pension payments. This is often times where you will hear stories of teachers being grouped many to an apartment or room, threats against the teacher of commiting fictional crimes.
Then there are the kroean academies that are above board. But, they are few and far between.
The US's infrastructure - especially it's public transportation and intercity rail, is pretty apalling. The transportation systems of Japan, France, Germany, even Spain, are like stepping into a "futuramas" that the old world fairs used to have.
Their public schools aer schools are a lot better too.
Why.
No, "free markets" didn't do it.
And the "revolutionary entrpeneurs" thst Obama and "Wired" magazine adore so much didn't do it either.
No, it was plain old, big bad socialistic government that builds and maintains those 400 kmh trains, nation-linking tunnels, 250 kmh autobahns, and seamless urban transit systems. It's fuel tax policy and regulations lead to cars vastly more fuel efficient than anything you can buy in the US.
It's socialistic, broad "social wage" policies (healthcare, paid family leave, more generous unemployment, a $17/hr minimum wage, paid 4-6 week vacations) mean that it's population doesn't live in continuous terror of losing their jobs, so they can pursue occupations and careers that they really enjoy doing, plus advernturous pastimes, art, culture...
JaneM June 24th, 2008 2:21 pm
"My daughter has been teaching English in South Korea for 16 months. She is amazed at their superior technology, their schools, their businesses and new construction. She says we are way behind."
I hate to hear that, but talking to our recent graduates, I believe it about their schools. And I wouldn't doubt the rest either.
The American worker is being sold down the river everywhere he looks. The American citizen may soon feel the same way.
The only thing I ever saw trickle down from those economics were higher payments.
Jesse isn't saying vote for Barack, but he is challenging the vicious trickle down lie. The robber barron terrorists need to be put in their places, and you better believe they are smelling the rage wafting in their facist direction.
But what's this Jesse? Corporations don't compete, unless you call the recent scream fest for entitlement between Northrup and Boeing (tanker deal), a form of competition.
No one has competed with the war profiteers in the last 7 years, similarly no one competed with the mafia when they started to burn Vietnam after blowing off Kennedy's head. Jesse, they prefer idiots, cheap H1-Bs or other thoughtless drones to work in the lower levels of big beasts like CACI, L3 or Lockheed. These companies don't want smart, well trained people, that would threaten their profits. They enjoy salesman like the revolting pig Steny Hoyer to get them their money.
The floods of 1993 should have been a lesson on how to do things right.
Unfortunately, the response was to give builders tax credits to build higher levees and then build more houses and businesses in flood plains those levees "protect".
Just as each succeeding financial crisis is worse than the one before it thanks to deregulation, each flood will be worse than the one before.
My daughter has been teaching English in South Korea for 16 months. She is amazed at their superior technology, their schools, their businesses and new construction. She says we are way behind.
The Republicans have us heading toward third-world status. That is fine with them as long as they keep their bank accounts padded and their children in elite schools. For the rest of us. Go f&%k ourselves!
"If we want to maintain a high-wage economy"
Ahh, but the corporate elites in this country don't want a high-wage economy, thus we have the system we have.