Gordon Brown's pleas for proceeds from the oil shock to be invested in renewables will fall on deaf ears
When physicians differ radically on the cause of a malady, they cannot prescribe a cure, and so the patient is condemned to go on suffering. That, in short, is the summary of the deliberations of the oil summit held in the Saudi city of Jeddah on Sunday -- as expressed in medical terms, the patient being the petroleum-consuming world.
King Abdullah, the host, representing the producer nations, blamed "the selfish interests" of the speculators at the New York Mercantile Exchange (Nymex) and International Petroleum Exchange (IPE) in London as the major reason for the unprecedented spurt in the price of oil, which closed at nearly $135 a barrel on Friday.
Contesting this view, US energy secretary, Samuel Bodman, baldly declared that there was "no evidence" that the speculators were driving future prices of petroleum.
It was left to Gordon Brown to state the basic fact: oil demand is rising faster than supply.
So the solution lies in increasing the supply - now. The only oil producing country that can do so - soon - is Saudi Arabia. King Abdullah announced an increase of 200,000 barrels per day (bpd), thus confirming the week-old leak, which the market has already factored in.
Nor was there anything new in the announcement by the Saudi oil minister, Ali al-Naimi, that his country's production capacity would be raised to 12.5 million bpd by the end of 2009. In the lives of the Nymex and IPE, that is a long way ahead.
That was the sort of timeframe that Brown had when presenting his "two way" deal between oil producers and consumers based on the idea of more freedom to invest in each other's markets.
Brown's plan requires Opec member states, currently exploiting their hydrocarbon resources exclusively through their state-owned companies, to allow western corporations to invest in oil fields and refineries in their countries.
In return, western countries would provide opportunities for Opec nations to take a major financial stake in the fast expanding renewable energy industries in the west.
A nice idea. But it ignores a key fact. Due to the high hydrocarbon prices, Opec treasuries are flush with cash. So their state-owned oil companies can buy the specialist services of the western oil giants for cash without giving them any stake in the ownership of their countries' oil and gas fields.
As for investing in the west, the managers of the super-affluent sovereign funds of these oil-rich nations have been taking their decisions in purely economic terms. Indeed they are told in no uncertain terms to do just that by the mighty US government.
The sovereign funds of states like the United Arab Emirates and Kuwait are an important part of the financial scene in London. Taking advantage of the softening in the housing market in Britain, they have been snapping up landmark commercial properties in the City of London, the financial hub of the capital.
As for the international oil market, with no meaningful increase in petroleum supplies on the horizon in the near future, the oil price is now set to cross the psychologically important threshold of $150 a barrel in the next few weeks.
--Dilip Hiro
© Guardian News and Media Limited 2008
Delicious
Digg
StumbleUpon
Newsvine
Facebook
Google
Yahoo
Technorati
6 Comments so far
Show AllDilip:
You pathetic limey, if you ever were one, your worries are for landmark properties in London?
Food riots, work stoppages, hunger, and your worry is about Saudi Arabia and Kuwait, taking advantage of the financial scene in London to snatch key properties? How arrogant - how very British.
If your Tony Blair, and it now appears Gordon Brown, hadn't so willingly followed George Bush(Downing Street Memo), none of us would be in this mess.
Must remember ol'e chap, that it was Tony Blair not only Colin Powell, that gave cover for the high price of oil you are paying for now.
heav y runner, every commodity and most stocks have speculation. For every contract to the upside there is a seller of that contract speculating that the commodity or stock is going to go down in price. Speculators are not all buying the upside, many are buying the downside. It is my understanding that spot oil is not directly related to the futures or options markets anyway. I have never bought futures contracts directly so not sure how that market works but I have used ETFs and Options to speculate on stocks and commodities many times.
Not to worry, Obama and McCain both promise lower gas prices if elected.
"Contesting this view, US energy secretary, Samuel Bodman, baldly declared that there was 'no evidence' that the speculators were driving future prices of petroleum."
What about the fact that they are bidding up the price in those said exchanges? Isn't that evidence that they are bidding up the price, since that is what they are doing?"
When I see a Bush administration official quoted that speculators are not driving up the price I put that tidbit in the "EVIDENCE THAT THEY ARE INDEED DRIVING UP THE PRICE" column.
It's about time that the liars and thieves in the White House and their lackeys were impeached, indicted, tried and imprisoned.
Electric car NO? - Compressed air car YES? Hopefully someone with more internet savy than I can get information out for "Motor Development International" or "TATA MOTOR'S" - "CITY CAT". They're planning production and claim the following. 125 miles on a charge - 68 mph - 5 min charge time with special equipment for $2.00 -or outlet charge with built in compressor 6 hrs. Sometimes facts change minds. I was once a proponent of corn to ethanol. If these new cars are what they promise to be it may take intense demand to make them availible in the USA.
Speculators are to blame for high oil prices.
Feed them to polar bears.