Subscribe to Common Dreams News Updates
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
Reporters Say Networks Put Wars on Back Burner
Getting a story on the evening news isn't easy for any correspondent. And for reporters in Iraq and Afghanistan, it is especially hard, according to Lara Logan, the chief foreign correspondent for CBS News. So she has devised a solution when she is talking to the network.
"Generally what I say is, 'I'm holding the armor-piercing R.P.G.,' " she said last week in an appearance on "The Daily Show," referring to the initials for rocket-propelled grenade. " 'It's aimed at the bureau chief, and if you don't put my story on the air, I'm going to pull the trigger.' "
Ms. Logan let a sly just-kidding smile sneak through as she spoke, but her point was serious. Five years into the war in Iraq and nearly seven years into the war in Afghanistan, getting news of the conflicts onto television is harder than ever.
"If I were to watch the news that you hear here in the United States, I would just blow my brains out because it would drive me nuts," Ms. Logan said.
According to data compiled by Andrew Tyndall, a television consultant who monitors the three network evening newscasts, coverage of Iraq has been "massively scaled back this year." Almost halfway into 2008, the three newscasts have shown 181 weekday minutes of Iraq coverage, compared with 1,157 minutes for all of 2007. The "CBS Evening News" has devoted the fewest minutes to Iraq, 51, versus 55 minutes on ABC's "World News" and 74 minutes on "NBC Nightly News." (The average evening newscast is 22 minutes long.)
CBS News no longer stations a single full-time correspondent in Iraq, where some 150,000 United States troops are deployed.
Paul Friedman, a senior vice president at CBS News, said the news division does not get reports from Iraq on television "with enough frequency to justify keeping a very, very large bureau in Baghdad." He said CBS correspondents can "get in there very quickly when a story merits it."
In a telephone interview last week, Ms. Logan said the CBS News bureau in Baghdad was "drastically downsized" in the spring. The network now keeps a producer in the country, making it less of a bureau and more of an office.
Interviews with executives and correspondents at television news networks suggested that while the CBS cutbacks are the most extensive to date in Baghdad, many journalists shared varying levels of frustration about placing war stories onto newscasts. "I've never met a journalist who hasn't been frustrated about getting his or her stories on the air," said Terry McCarthy, an ABC News correspondent in Baghdad.
By telephone from Baghdad, Mr. McCarthy said he was not as busy as he was a year ago. A decline in the relative amount of violence "is taking the urgency out" of some of the coverage, he said. Still, he gets on ABC's "World News" and other programs with stories, including one on Friday about American gains in northern Iraq.
Anita McNaught, a correspondent for the Fox News Channel, agreed. "The violence itself is not the story anymore," she said. She counted eight reports she had filed since arriving in Baghdad six weeks ago, noting that cable news channels like Fox News and CNN have considerably more time to fill with news than the networks. CNN and Fox each have two fulltime correspondents in Iraq.
Richard Engel, the chief foreign correspondent for NBC News, who splits his time between Iraq and other countries, said he found his producers "very receptive to stories about Iraq." He and other journalists noted that the heated presidential primary campaign put other news stories on the back burner earlier this year.
Ms. Logan said she begged for months to be embedded with a group of Navy Seals, and when she came back with the story, a CBS producer said to her, "One guy in uniform looks like any other guy in a uniform." In the follow-up phone interview, Ms. Logan said the producer no longer worked at CBS. And in both interviews, she emphasized that many journalists at CBS News are pushing for war coverage, specifically citing Jeff Fager, the executive producer of "60 Minutes." CBS News won a Peabody Award last week for a "60 Minutes" report about a Marine charged in the killings at Haditha.
On "The Daily Show," Ms. Logan echoed the comments of other journalists when she said that many Americans seem uninterested in the wars now. Mr. McCarthy said that when he is in the United States, bringing up Baghdad at a dinner party "is like a conversation killer."
Coverage of the war in Afghanistan has increased slightly this year, with 46 minutes of total coverage year-to-date compared with 83 minutes for all of 2007. NBC has spent 25 minutes covering Afghanistan, partly because the anchor Brian Williams visited the country earlier in the month. Through Wednesday, when an ABC correspondent was in the middle of a prolonged visit to the country, ABC had spent 13 minutes covering Afghanistan. CBS has spent eight minutes covering Afghanistan so far this year.
Both Ms. Logan and Mr. McCarthy noted that more coalition soldiers were killed in Afghanistan in May than in Iraq. No American television network has a full-time correspondent in Afghanistan, although CNN recently said it would open a bureau in Kabul.
"It's terrible," Ms. Logan said in the telephone interview. She called it a financial decision. "We can't afford to maintain operations in Iraq and Afghanistan at the same time," she said. "It's so expensive and the security risks are so great that it's prohibitive."
Mr. Friedman said coverage of Iraq is enormously expensive, mostly due to the security risks. He said meetings with other television networks about sharing the costs of coverage have faltered for logistical reasons.
Journalists at all three American television networks with evening newscasts expressed worries that their news organizations would withdraw from the Iraqi capital after the November presidential election. They spoke only on the condition of anonymity in order to avoid offending their employers.
© 2008 The New York Times



44 Comments so far
Show AllNPR went on and on this a.m. about the difficulties astronauts will supposedly have on election day casting their votes since they will be up in their spaceship. They finally stated they would be using absentee ballots. Wow. I'd never have guessed it.
Lindsay Lohan, Britney Spears, Paris Hilton, Brangelina, American Idol, etc. are more important to people than what the government is doing with their tax money it seems. I'm cutting the cable next month.
the news is Israel/Jewish centered, nothing else matters.
control the media and the USA cows fall to sleep. The day they start to control the internet the USA will be so far out of the loop on the rest of the world you may as well not vote.
Thank you to this correspondent for telling the truth about the networks. The American public needs to hear the truth about the role of the media and its propaganda.
There are paramilitary units and death squads in Third World Countries ruled by dictators and oligarchies. Here in the U.S. we have the mainstream media, the network newsies, such as Charlie Gibson to do the dirty work. Bloodless, the deeds they do and don't do are strangling the life of the average citizen who is unaware that they naively allow them to come into their homes. They helped hijack the last election (s) and brought us to silence about going to war. Now they claim that we are already familiar with John McCain, and so they go on and on trying to find dirt on Obama. Yet, McCain, their darling is poised to become the next idiot president, whom the press just loves and overlooks his flip-flopping and seriously dangerous positions on the issues.
It would be "fair," Charlie Gibson, if you would reveal that you are in the high income bracket that Obama plans to tax.
Kloro said: "anybody who gets their 'facts' from TV deserves their slavery."
I turned the "Eye" off last year. I now, read, garden, walk, write, Sirius, XM and give thanks for the Internet, while it's still . . .
Never fear. When Bush bombs Iran (via Israel), the war coverage will pick up. I predict a July 4th-like fireworks show. It'll really help McCain (who's probably a son of Cain judging from his name). Whatever, murder is his game.
The Networks know they can't compete with the Internet and cable news.
They are also beginning to know they can't compete with internet and cable with most programing.
Their news is for folks who can't afford cable or computers and they can't get into anything deep because it would expose how their corporations are a part of the military industrial media banking complex.... cable is not much better on getting deep but is more extensive.
I watched Crosswalk last night with Jack Nicholson, and there are plenty of cool movies on cable. I think I will keep my addiction to the tube and not be worried about how the network's days are numbered since they represent the worst of our system's media.... at least they have some local news.
If you are cleansing your mind by throwing out your TV, you are one in a million but keep my dirty mind informed of what I'm missing in the meantime.
Don't get me started! NPR, National Petroleum Radio, the so-called "liberal" news organization, sucks big-time! The guy with the weekend show interviewed Condosleezy Rice the other day. Of course he didn't bother to ask her if Iran was going to nuke us anytime soon, or whatever happened to that mushroom cloud. Anyway, they are about as worthless as Faux News, MSNBC (except for Olbermann, and I see him on the internet when he says something important), CNBC, or CNN, all of them ministries of propoganda for the Bushista Christianist/Zionist Corporatists and what used to be the Republican, but now is the Repugnantcan Party. Israel does seem to get a lot of coverage on NPR, and you wouldn't know what the hell was going on in places like Columbia if you only listened to NPR, and they do have some reports on stupid things, like the one mentioned earlier in this post on how astronauts would vote! They recently did a report on how some guy with five kids really needed that SUV, and was hurting over the price of a gallon. Did they find another person who has kids but gave up his SUV for buying a very roomy Prius? No; but I know people who've done so, and that would be an interesting story. I haven't heard much from NPR about people getting out of their cars to take public transportation either! Guess NPR doesn't want to piss off their corporate sponsers, you know what I mean! Thankfully there is Free Speech TV on my local community access, but then I do live in what's supposed to be (but really isn't, as there's a big highway-widening project ongoing as opposed to restoring passenger rail) a politically progressive area, Santa Cruz. Democracy Now is on the radio a few times a day on a public radio station that insists on broadcasting NPR, which is why I won't subscribe to it. I do give money, by the way, to a public radio station that is one of the few in the nation that has absolutely NO ties with a university, corpoate money grants, NPR, BBC, PRI, Pacifica; one of the few relying totally on subscriber money: KKUP of Santa Clara/Cupertino, California. They do have some interesting political programs on with great music programming, a station that epitomizes what is an independent radio station. Lastly: at least PBS has Moyers on the air and he has some hard-hitting, truth revealing presentations. I'll applaud PBS for having a program on recently that was hosted by Klick and Clack, and they reported on the latest non-polluting, non-C02 producing technology in autos, including the Tesla all-electric roadster. McCain doesn't seem to realize that that battery already exists!
If reporters would continue to leak the behind the
scene details everyday, we could greatly weaken
the corporate-press.
Another way would be for citizens to put their TV's in the hall closet!!
Turn them OFF, folks!!!
The thing that must be understood is that journalism as we knew it is dead.
Once upon a time, there was a code of ethics for journalism. And the media companies respected and protected this code. There was what was known as a 'wall' between the the 'news' operations and the 'business' operations of a media concern. And this was also made true by the fact that most media concerns were independent operations instead of subsidiaries of some big corporation.
In this world, what the journalists considered 'news' is what was reported. That's why the Vietnam war stayed on TV screens even though there were complaints against the media. That's why the civil rights movement was reported, and non-violent political action was effective, even though the powerful (all the way up to JFK's Justice Dept under Bobby) were ok with the civil rights protesters getting fire-hosed and beaten.
That world is gone. The problem is that we all seem to expect today's media to honor it.
The answer is just to turn them off. Realize that what's broadcast today as 'news' is really just propaganda. Realize that what's broadcast as 'news' is always chosen to enhance the corporate bottom line.
Realize that as such, these 'news' broadcast provide little to no value to the viewer\listener\reader. Instead, they actually provide negative value because if you really want to understand the world around you, then you need to clense your mind of the falsehoods that have been implanted by this news.
So, I hope the these stories continue, as its perhaps the most important thing we can do to educate our fellow citizens on how they are being mislead.
And no, my TV is not OFF, nor in the closet. Its way too valuable for that. It brings me Amy Goodman and Democracy Now! everyday. It brings me the rest of what Free Speech TV and World Link TV show. It brings me Bill Moyers via PBS. It brought me most of the recent conference on media reform via CSPAN.
Like anything else, its a tool that demands proper use to be effective. Blaming the TV for the viewers poor choices in programming is just silly. And punishing the TV by putting it in the closet is as well.
from the article:
"Paul Friedman, a senior vice president at CBS News, said the news division does not get reports from Iraq on television "with enough frequency to justify keeping a very, very large bureau in Baghdad." He said CBS correspondents can "get in there very quickly when a story merits it."
every morning at 6am, i get up and let my cat out. she makes her rounds, sniffing at bushes and flowerpots, at benches, bugs and car bumpers. when she's done, she could tell me (if i could understand her) everything that had happened overnight in our neighborhood, because she's immersed in it, familiar with it and all its denizens in all weathers.
we've got to start working on her communications skills and building a brand, because she understands what the entire corporate media do not: you can't cover local news---and ALL news is local---by helicoptering in, talking to one "expert" and one "colorful character" and then writing a story tailored to your editor's preconceptions.
from conscience 1:10pm:
"Turn them OFF, folks!!!"
amen.
Sampson has a point. I too use my TV to watch the important programs on C-SPAN, along with keeping up on what the idiots in the House and Senate are doing; and Bill Moyer on PBS. Since I have only basic cable, those are about the only ones I do watch.
Unfortunatly, it's all the people who don't even bother to watch the whitewashed or washed-out news (whatever) that'll keep the channels alive with all the other junk they do watch on them.
Fits right in with the "Ho Hum" attitude of the general population. Oblivious to the coming holocaust and more concerned with who is doing who in Hollywood.
Once again, we are invited to believe that the invisible hand of the market place is at work, causing a very politically expedient mass media phenomenon to occur at just the most opportune moment (for those who desire the US military occupation presence in Iraq to be institutionalized rather than ended).
The financial cost of maintaining television journalists in the war zone are just too high for the American networks. That's why Fox has two, CNN has two, and the former Big Three networks have - sometimes - one would be reporter each, who are having difficulties getting air time for their stories. Just over half a dozen staff reporters? For the whole country? For the whole war? For the whole US media market?
Further, plans are afoot for CBS, NBC, and ABC to pull their newsroom operations out altogether once the November presidential election is over. Funny piece of timing, that.
Totaling up the air time minutes, according to this NY Times article we have a 90% decrease in TV news coverage from the Iraq theatre of operations in 2008 compared to 2007. It is duly noted "many Americans seem uninterested in the wars now", hinting that fickle US viewers really have only themselves to blame. Right. If it bleeds it ledes, if and only if it's American blood.
We're told that if only the money were available, and if only the American viewing audience tuned back in, then there almost certainly would be plenty of fair and balanced coverage of the big increase in cruise missle strikes from Predator drones this spring, the mass round ups of Moktada's supporters in Sadr City, Basra and Najaf in advance of the fall Iraqi elections, and the endless Bush administration arm twisting and Maliki regime intrigues accompanying closed door negotiations over long term US military bases, and those long term oil production sharing agreements. Sure.
Unless Little George springs a truly sick October surprize by bombing Iran, it just might be that by November bringing US forces home from Iraq will hardly be treated as an electoral issue at all, simply due to lack of popular interest.
That way we can all concentrate on more important things - like the looming threat of rampant gay marriage, or the latest speculative expose about Barack Obama's secret religious beliefs.
Bill from Saginaw
DUDE! The car commercials keep getting more surreal, Maaann! Like WOW!
I'm so glad I killed mine....
william street, maybe you can answer this.
How much do NBC, CBS, and NBC pay to use the public airwaves? I bet the government can charge a lot since the big three networks take in millions upon millions in advertisement revenue.
Right on Samson and Wilmoor...
I, too, have only basic TV. No CNN, No cooking, etal. I haven't watched CBS, NBC or ABC or (God no!) FOX in years! I DO watch, C-SPAN, some PBS, including Bill Moyers, Amy Goodman, NOW, BBC news; sometimes NewsHour with Jim Lehrer. I also enjoy Mystery on PBS plus some other stuff there as well.
another thing...I really enjoy is good music which I listen to whenever and often have a good book to read.
I DO read Common Dreams daily and sometimes have a word or two of my own.
When we totally SHUT OFF the MSM crap--we can you know--they loose the power to propagandize us. It is very liberating!
The MSM may be right. If they don't cover the occupation, perhaps "The People" will either think it's all over and our soldiers are back in their barracks on American soil, or, if not that particular swindle, then perhaps they can get the American Consumer to believe that Iraq is as calm as a public library at 10 A.M. The point is to keep the Republicans in power at any and all costs. They must see McCain elected and the Jack The Ripper economic policies continued. Obama may promise a thimble full of "change" but even that's far too much for them.
What wars?
Is it any wonder that I unplugged my television set last year? Instead of getting an HDTV decoder at taxpayer expense I would prefer the disposal fees.
That LIBERAL news bias.
Maybe reporters should unionize to protect each others' rights to maintain journalistic standards and report on important stories unpopular to the corporate masters-- try to fire one and they all go on strike and/or report on the story of the firing while digging deeper in to the story that precipitated the firing.
No TV for about ten years now. I saw Kucinich read the 35 articles of impeachment on CNNs web site. I occasionally catch "best of" Daily show clips on the net too. DVDs and cheap movie theaters keep me plenty entertained. I get all my news from CommonDreams, OpEdNews and NPR --when I want mainstream Obama-bashing drivel-- I couldn't believe NPR's commentator the other day musing about whether we could trust Obama's campaign promises after he decided on non-public funding for his campaign. They described McCain as "popular" because of his best-selling books. No mention of McCain's flip-flops or Obama's popularity as evidenced by crowds of 75,000 people or more. And yet, NPR has this ridiculous reputation for being liberal-- unbelievable.
Personally, I like to watch CNN's daily three stories over and over.
The non-stop coverage of Tim Russert's death was pretty cool too. I was totally glued to the tv for any updates.
And I love reading about how network execs can't figure out why their ratings are falling...must mean they need to pare down their news coverage and pump up their schedule with commentary shows.
I wonder if Keith Olberman is going to talk about Obama today.
I couldn't believe NPR's commentator the other day musing about whether we could trust Obama's campaign promises after he decided on non-public funding for his campaign. They described McCain as "popular" because of his best-selling books. No mention of McCain's flip-flops or Obama's popularity as evidenced by crowds of 75,000 people or more. And yet, NPR has this ridiculous reputation for being liberal– unbelievable.
I heard that too. It was Scott Simon on his Saturday morning show. NPR has been dipping its beak more and more into the poisoned bird bath of flag saluting, starched collar MSM bullshit for at least a year now, probably longer. NPR reporters must now wear short pants and skip to work.
"NPR reporters must now wear short pants and skip to work." ..you forgot the Pom Poms..
Mordechai Shiblokov says it very nicely: the media campaign underway is to acclimate the American public to an "acceptable" level of day-to-day, month-to-month carnage involving US forces in the Middle East. If a semi-blackout on military and political events by the mainstream media assists in making our continued occupation of Iraq appear to be a natural, normal state of affairs - the price that must be paid so's we don't have to fight Them over here - then Bush and the GOP neocons have succeeded.
Bill from Saginaw
I sure hope it doesn't have anything to do with all those heart-warming and "patriotic" commercials from Boeing, Lockheed Martin, and the Army Advantage Fund. Anyone here know if their ads are causing the war criticism silence? They must be making billions faster than they know to spend them.
Complicity...Indict them along with the entire treacherous government!
www.votestrike.com
anybody who gets their 'facts' from TV deserves their slavery.
Contrast this coverage w/the overhyped run up to the shock and awe "new wars" when the killing machine fronting for multinational corporations blasted and bombed its way to "victory" in Afghanistan and Iraq. Fresh shock and awe is cool entertainment. Quagmire is messy, and fails to project the proper image of our corporate adminstration. A new shock and awe such as with Iran would be alot more fun for the corporate networks.
Like my grandmere used to say, keep it simple: MEDIA WHORES
TURN IT OFF...You will not miss ONE BIT of truth!
This video doesn't cover everthing, but it is a good staring place to connect the dots on media, war, power, money, religion RFID chips and the whole damn thing -
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-594683847743189197
w
w
w
.
z
e
i
t
g
e
i
s
t
m
o
v
i
e
.
c
o
m
If anybody wants to read some real reporting from Iraq, look no further than the many articles penned by Patrick Cockburn.
I'm not sure why commondreams even reports anything anymore.
"News Networks don't pay attention to the war."
"The Bush administration lied and misled the public."
"The democrats pretend to do something in congress."
It's all stuff I already know.
NPR is CIA
wikipedia the president kevin klose
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kevin_Klose
and then read this:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radio_Free_Europe
and then read this:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radio_Free_Afghanistan
and then read this:
http://www.iraqhurr.org/
SAMSON . .
Amy Goodman can be listened to via the radio --
or on the internet -- including transcripts.
I'm not familiar with Free Speech TV nor World Link show,
but wondering if they are internet?
Bill Moyers has left PBS any number of times hoping to
reform them, but constantly returns to present programming
which is highly interesting but rarely gets anyone up off
the couch to do anything.
Phil Donahue was a "get people up off the couch guy" and he is gone.
C-span's heyday is over --- just as they were planning to go to C-span III, the rug was pulled out from them by cable monopolies. In fact, we have totally lost C-span II here in my area of Central NJ--gone to High Definition . . .
because it was essential that NJ see the SENATE in high definition!!! Right? Couldn't have been political by any chance? Currently we're all under the HD threat of reduction of more services, more inconviences with higher costs!
One of my fondest memories of Comcast was their changing all the channel line ups just a few days before the 2004 elections!!
Meanwhile, PBS delivers nonsense on a higher level --
excluding their excellent "In the Life" -- a marvel that they hide at odd hours of the night and deliver on a once-a-month schedule ---
You could see programming about the British Royals which doesn't question the continuing existance of monarchy --
You can see a second series of Agatha Christie produced in a very inferior way to the first series.
How about Antiques Roadshow?
Loved the doo-wop . . . but is that what PBS is supposed to be about?
You can see the meaningfulness of PBS dropping rapidly!
On regular TV, the attempt to torture and brutalize the nation continues with tattoo parlors and gambling shows.
Game shows --
Old movies repeated endless --- much of them war movies!
Get a laptop and watch what you want to see -- picking and choose -- on that. You don't need a TV.
QUOTE: And no, my TV is not OFF, nor in the closet. Its way too valuable for that. It brings me Amy Goodman and Democracy Now! everyday. It brings me the rest of what Free Speech TV and World Link TV show. It brings me Bill Moyers via PBS. It brought me most of the recent conference on media reform via CSPAN.
Like anything else, its a tool that demands proper use to be effective. Blaming the TV for the viewers poor choices in programming is just silly. And punishing the TV by putting it in the closet is as well.UNQUOTE
PS: Checked both World Link and Free Speech TV and they're
BOTH on the internet ---
so again -- no TV required . . .
Mordechai Shiblikov, I went round 'n round with NPR over their coverage of the Colombian "laptop" affair. The entire staged publicity event about Interpol inspecting the laptops was a farce. The coverage strongly implied, and stated, that Interpol backed Colombian charges against Venezuela. In fact, the title of the piece was "Interpol backs Colombian Charges". The actual Interpol report clearly stated that it had NO bearing on the authenticity or source of the material. The sole finding of the Interpol report, in fact, was that no USER files were modified while the laptops were in Colombian hands (they considered "user" files to be documents and applications. The report went on to state that over 20,000 files were created, modified or deleted on the laptops while in Colombian hands. The NPR report included a translated statement by Ron Noble, now head of Interpol, formerly US Treasury cop, stating, "No one can question whether the Colombians tampered with the laptops". Exactly the opposite of the truth (unless it was an extremely ironic statement meaning, of course they tampered). I'm a computer engineer of 20+ years experience, including highly secure operating systems and computer security. I wrote NPR's VP of Programming, Ellen Weiss, and the ombudsman, to complain. The reporter and foreign editor "stood behind their story". The ombudsman's office did exactly nothing for me. NPR lied. They also lost a contributor and listener :) The reporter was Juan Forero, I heard him in another anti-Venezuela story. Yellow journalism at its best. This, while Venezuela is empowering the poor, and Colombian is murdering them. In my email to these folks, which they read, I said, look, you have a responsibility. We just went through a rush to war with the enabling of media. I strongly implied they were assisting BushCo and promoting war. The next day a Navy plane buzzed Venezuelan airspace, quite near an official residence of Chavez, as I recall.
Who's watching network news?
It occurs to me the msm have an awful lot to answer for. They are largely responsible for tell people all those lies with a straight face, to get us into BOTH so called wars. There was never an excuse for bombing all those people in Afghanistan. And they were spinning in circles to et us to attack Iraq. There job is to report the news not be cheerleaders for wars. And that's just the crimes they committed. It's just as bad and maybe worse to ignore so much of what goes on. They never told the people anything about the devastating sanctions on Iraq. They never said how hideous was that shock and awe, all the people that were getting killed. Or the daily reports out of Afghanistan about the cluster bombs flying around one village after another. And it's still going on. Maybe if the people knew what their troops were doing they'd make them stop. It's not like "reporters" are just enablers either. The media are perpetrators. Criminals like the people who pay them.
__ JUST SAY NO TO __ P R O P A G A N D A
__ Friends don't let friends watch TV __
__ Here's an EGG, here's an egg on PROPAGANDA
__ AVOID BEING TERRORIZED by PROPAGANDA
______________ JUST SAY NO ______________
'bringing up Baghdad at a dinner party "is like a conversation killer"'
In social situations, you have a choice between being honest or shutting up about the occupation of Iraq, loss of civil liberties, etc. etc. If you shut up, you may win popularity with people of little consequence. If you tell the truth, worthwhile people will gravitate towards you, if not immediately, then later. The trick is to talk about it in a way that engages rather than annoys.