Subscribe to Common Dreams News Updates
Most Popular This Week
- Accidentally Released - and Incredibly Embarrassing - Documents Show How Goldman et al Engaged in 'Naked Short Selling'
- Apocalypse Fairly Soon: The Moment of Truth in Europe
- The Rise of the New Economy Movement
- NDAA's 'Indefinite Detention' Provisions Unconstitutional, says Judge
- Preying on Poverty: How Government and Corporations Use the Poor as Piggy Banks
- Accidentally Released - and Incredibly Embarrassing - Documents Show How Goldman et al Engaged in 'Naked Short Selling'
- The Rise of the New Economy Movement
- Preying on Poverty: How Government and Corporations Use the Poor as Piggy Banks
- The Organic Watergate: Alarming Report Reveals USDA's Cozy Relationship with Corporate Agribusinesses in 'Organics'
- Updated: Under Pressure, TED Releases 'Income Inequality' Talk
Popular content
Today's Top News
Water Flowing Back Into Public Hands
PARIS - The announcement by the Paris municipality that water services will return to public hands by 2010 is in line with a global trend of ending privatisation of such services.
Mayor Bertrand Delanoë announced Jun. 2 that the municipal administration would regain control of all water services for the city, ending a private monopoly that has lasted more than 100 years.
The contracts with the world's two biggest water service companies, Suez and Veolia, will not be extended after Dec. 31, 2009.
"We want to offer a better service, at a better price," Delanoë said. "We also promise that prices would be stable."
Delanoë said his administration will encourage other municipalities in the Ile de France region around Paris to end privatisation of water services.
"That France, once known as the heartland of water privatisation, is embracing a return to public management of water services, is a strong signal in this new pattern," Olivier Hoedeman of the Water Remunicipalisation Tracker told IPS. The group, a sub-division of the Amsterdam-based Corporate Europe Observatory (CEO) and the Transnational Institute, documents the decline of water privatisation.
The list of 're-municipalisation' of water services is long, and includes countries as diverse as Mali in West Africa, Uruguay where water has been brought back into the hands of the state at a national level, Buenos Aires and Santa Fe in Argentina, Cochabamba in Bolivia and Hamilton in Canada, besides other cities in France.
More than 40 French municipalities and urban communities have taken water services back into public hands over the last ten years, and brought improved services, cheaper.
In the 1990s many countries privatised their water and sanitation services, particularly in Africa, Asia and Latin America, under strong pressure from neo-liberal governments, particularly in the European Union (EU), and from international financial institutions such as the World Bank, the International Monetary Fund and the World Trade Organisation (WTO) to 'open up' national services.
The biggest beneficiaries were Suez and Veolia, formerly known as the Compagnie Lyonnaise des Eaux and Compagnie Générale des Eaux respectively, which have been controlling water services in France since the late 19th century.
These two companies ventured into practically all privatisation of water services, from Argentina, Bolivia and Colombia in South America to numerous countries in Eastern Europe, and in the Philippines.
In Eastern Europe, Suez and Veolia won several privatisation contracts with the help of the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD), a state-owned institution created in 1990 following a proposal by former French president Francois Mitterrand, and headed since then by a French bureaucrat.
The EU was also instrumental in trying to impose the worldwide privatisation of water and other public services through the WTO.
At a November 2001 meeting of the WTO in Doha, Qatar, former EU trade commissioner Pascal Lamy of France inserted a clause into the final text of a resolution, to call for "the reduction or, as appropriate, elimination of tariff and non-tariff barriers to environmental goods and services." This would include water services. And Lamy now heads the WTO.
The EU has worked closely with the water companies to fashion its trade policies. In a May 17, 2002 letter, the European Commission, the EU's executive, invited private water companies to inform it of "the position and interest of the European industry, their main market, obstacles if any to access new markets, as well as other questions you would consider relevant in this context."
Bernard Maris, professor of economics at the University of Paris VIII, said Suez and Veolia were behaving like "conquerors" abroad. "At the same time, they have enjoyed a century of protectionism, and their home market continues today to be closed to foreign competitors."
Many of the privatised operations in France and abroad missed targets to expand and upgrade networks, introduced high price increases, and unaffordable connection fees. "Management activities were not transparent and accountable," Hoedeman told IPS. "As a result numerous contracts were terminated, often following popular unrest."
Privatisation of water services in the French Alpine city Grenoble in 1987 was promoted by leading ministers of the government of then president Jacques Chirac. The project by Suez was marked by corruption, fraudulent accounting practices, and high prices.
In 1999, French courts sentenced former ministers and leading Suez executives to prison sentences for their involvement in the corrupt operation, and ordered the company to pay back all water charges imposed between 1990 and 1998.
Once the court cancelled the Grenoble contract and returned water services to the city municipality, prices were immediately brought down. By the end of 2002, the price of water in Grenoble, at 2.14 euros a cubic metre, was about the lowest in all French cities. Similar improvement came in cities around the world that put an end to privatisation of water services.
© 2008 Inter Press Service

20 Comments so far
Show AllYou know what they say "French is always better than sex"
To me, this is a positive article. Finally, something that no person should own is being slowly returned to the Public's care. There are many things which the government can do better than the private sector - firemen being but one example.
Now we need to get electricity back in the hands of the public on a nationwide basis. And there are more.
NO public service should be in the hands of private enterprise. NO!!! to profits before people.
Enron had been exploring how to get into the municipal water supply business before it self-destructed. Can you imagine.
Disbelievers of the story published by Reuters and other News Agencies about the Japanese water car should send their comments and criticisms to KIYOSHI HIRASAWA, the CEO of GENEPAX the company that makes the car. I'm sure he would be VERY INTERESTED in hearing from you! I'm sure there are still some Americans that think the Japanese cannot humble the American Auto Industry (Toyota $96.34 vs GM $13.25 or Honda $34.71 vs Ford $5.44) or that the Japanese will never build their own airliners (Mitsubishi MRJ). Fact not fiction!
Imagine what would happen if the same process were applied to OIL & GAS.
In Venezuela gasoline is $0.12 per gallon at the pump.
What a novel idea....have the people in the community operate & control their own resources!! Guess it CAN be done without corporate control.
A M A Z I N G !!!!
duh!
$0.12 per gallon for gasoline? TOO EXPENSIVE. The Japanese are making a car that runs on water (GENEPAK)Reuters. The technology has been there for thirty years or more (Daniel Dingel, Stan Meyers - You Tube). Why hasn't Common Dreams published these articles?
henri, it's called Common DREAMS, not Common FANTASIES. There is a difference. Dreams can be attained, fantasies are just what they sound like.
The Kennebunkport water district is about to sell their water to Nestles! WTF
What! Cha-Vezz is charging the public 12 cents a gallon? Wait, is that for premium or the cheap stuff? What a bastard! U.S. oil companies used to get 14 times that from Venezuelan oil.
On June 23rd, 2008 4:42 pm henri wrote >$0.12 per gallon for gasoline? TOO EXPENSIVE. The Japanese are making a car that runs on water (GENEPAK)Reuters. The technology has been there for thirty years or more (Daniel Dingel, Stan Meyers - You Tube). Why hasn't Common Dreams published these articles?<
All water to energy schemes involve cracking water into hydrogen using hydrolysis since all practically available hydrogen for fuel is locked into water. Most hydrogen is sourced from reformed natural gas. Hydrolysis is an inefficient, energy intensive way to obtain hydrogen. It takes 4 times as much energy in the form of electricity to store this energy in hydrogen as it does to charge a common lead-acid battery.
Hydrogen can be cracked from coal and oil but it is a waste of these resources and leads to green house gas emissions and thus does not solve the problem of fossil fuel dependency.
This is why most of those who take the trouble to convert their cars from interntal combustion engine drivin vehicles over to electric motor driven ones use lead-acid batteries.
I wonder why, with all the privatisation hype, where public utilities were auctioned off to the the highest bribe, sorry I meant bidder, why no-one ever ever thought to sell off sewage disposal. What's the matter you capitalist pigs, is my shit not good enough for you?
"lead-acid batteries"
Yea, and there is one of the biggest looming issues with most alternative energies where storage is concerned. Muck has just said he's going to have a lottery for innovative research into developing an environmentally friendly battery. I very much doubt whether any wizzes are going to come up with a real advance in the technology of a lead-acid battery. I have discussed this with people before but its not a subject those supporting renewable energy have any answer to it seems. I'm not an expert and I may be wrong.
"under strong pressure from ... such as the World Bank, the International Monetary Fund and the World Trade Organisation (WTO)"
Ah, the Three Amigos, the usual suspects. The same team that brought you World Food Crisis.
"lead-acid batteries"
These things must surely cost heaps to produce (certainly judging from their price), they have a fairly limited useful life, and disposal (re-manufacture?) is problematic. I can't see anything particularly green about them.
Finally, some good news. Roll back capital.
A positive story on CommonDreams - NOT BEFORE TIME!!!
The overwhelmingly negative news is getting too much for me to cope with; so, now, I'm ignoring most of the articles on CD.
It's a sad indictment on the "mainstream" media - and the state of our civilization - that all we hear about is how hopeless everything is, how the politicians are - yet again! - screwing us, and how the public are - once more! - being ignored.
Perhaps CommonDreams can try to look further afield for some positive news/ psychologically "friendly" articles.
Filling one's head with so many negative stories is really a form of torture.
In the case of the USA we too must embark upon an era of evisceration, of cutting the malignant grasp of the Neo Robber Barons on the commonweal!