Subscribe to Common Dreams News Updates
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
These Wars Are About Oil, Not Democracy
The ugly truth behind the Iraq and Afghanistan wars finally has emerged.
Four major western oil companies, Exxon Mobil, Shell, BP and Total are about to sign U.S.-brokered no-bid contracts to begin exploiting Iraq's oil fields. Saddam Hussein had kicked these firms out three decades ago when he nationalized Iraq's oil industry. The U.S.-installed Baghdad regime is welcoming them back.
Iraq is getting back the same oil companies that used to exploit it when it was a British colony.
As former fed chairman Alan Greenspan recently admitted, the Iraq war was all about oil. The invasion was about SUV's, not democracy.
Afghanistan just signed a major deal to launch a long-planned, 1,680-km pipeline project expected to cost $8 billion. If completed, the Turkmenistan-Afghanistan-Pakistan-India pipeline (TAPI) will export gas and later oil from the Caspian basin to Pakistan's coast where tankers will transport it to the West.
The Caspian basin located under the Central Asian states of Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan and Kazakkstan, holds an estimated 300 trillion cubic feet of gas and 100-200 billion barrels of oil. Securing the world's last remaining known energy El Dorado is a strategic priority for the western powers.
But there are only two practical ways to get gas and oil out of land-locked Central Asia to the sea: Through Iran, or through Afghanistan to Pakistan. Iran is taboo for Washington. That leaves Pakistan, but to get there, the planned pipeline must cross western Afghanistan, including the cities of Herat and Kandahar.
PIPELINE DEAL
In 1998, the Afghan anti-Communist movement Taliban and a western oil consortium led by the U.S. firm Unocal signed a major pipeline deal. Unocal lavished money and attention on the Taliban, flew a senior delegation to Texas, and hired a minor Afghan official, Hamid Karzai.
Enter Osama bin Laden. He advised the unworldly Taliban leaders to reject the U.S. deal and got them to accept a better offer from an Argentine consortium. Washington was furious and, according to some accounts, threatened the Taliban with war.
In early 2001, six or seven months before 9/11, Washington made the decision to invade Afghanistan, overthrow the Taliban, and install a client regime that would build the energy pipelines. But Washington still kept sending money to the Taliban until four months before 9/11 in an effort to keep it "on side" for possible use in a war against China.
The 9/11 attacks, about which the Taliban knew nothing, supplied the pretext to invade Afghanistan. The initial U.S. operation had the legitimate objective of wiping out Osama bin Laden's al-Qaida. But after its 300 members fled to Pakistan, the U.S. stayed on, built bases -- which just happened to be adjacent to the planned pipeline route -- and installed former Unocal "consultant" Hamid Karzai as leader.
Washington disguised its energy geopolitics by claiming the Afghan occupation was to fight "Islamic terrorism," liberate women, build schools and promote democracy. Ironically, the Soviets made exactly the same claims when they occupied Afghanistan from 1979-1989. The Iraq cover story was weapons of mass destruction and democracy.
Work will begin on the TAPI once Taliban forces are cleared from the pipeline route by U.S., Canadian and NATO forces. As American analyst Kevin Phillips writes, the U.S. military and its allies have become an "energy protection force."
ADDED BENEFIT
From Washington's viewpoint, the TAPI deal has the added benefit of scuttling another proposed pipeline project that would have delivered Iranian gas and oil to Pakistan and India.
India's energy needs are expected to triple over the next decade. Delhi, which has its own designs on Afghanistan, is cock-a-hoop over the new pipeline plan.
Russia, by contrast, is grumpy, having hoped to monopolize Central Asian energy exports.
Energy is more important than blood in our modern world. The U.S. is a great power with massive energy needs. Domination of oil is a pillar of America's world power. Let's be realistic. Afghanistan and Iraq are about oil, nothing else.
--Eric Margolis
Copyright © 2008, Canoe Inc.



84 Comments so far
Show AllTHE TORONTO SUN
It is a rag of a paper run by yes right wing union busting assholes. I refuse to even read it as it's only saving grace is a SunShine girl. Some tramp from where ever with her tits half hanging out. Nascar fans and North of highway 7 as we call it up here reads the crap you find in the Sun.
Oil " So "
9/11 trade towers fall at the speed of grity " So "
3000 New Yorkers Dead " So "
NY Fire Fighters Dead " So "
NY Police Dead " So "
Fear propaganda " So "
4000 GI Deaths " So "
70000 GI Injuried " So "
600000 Iraqis Dead " So "
2000000 Iraqis Displaced " So "
1 Trillion Dollars debt " So "
2 Illegal Wars " So "
Warrantless Surveilance " So "
Torture of Americans " So "
Torture of anybody " So "
Poor Vetren Health care " So "
Democrat sell outs " So "
Repulican Thugs " So "
$22/barell to 1" So "36/barell " So "
7 years of lies " So "
Cia outing of plame " So "
Constituional oath " So "
F--k Dick Cheny Tratitor Hang Him " So "
Oil " So "
9/11 trade towers fall at the speed of gravity " So "
3000 New Yorkers Dead " So "
NY Fire Fighters Dead " So "
NY Police Dead " So "
Fear propaganda " So "
4000 GI Deaths " So "
70000 GI Injuried " So "
600000 Iraqis Dead " So "
2000000 Iraqis Displaced " So "
1 Trillion Dollars debt " So "
2 Illegal Wars " So "
Warrantless Surveilance " So "
Torture of Americans " So "
Torture of anybody " So "
Poor Vetren Health care " So "
Democrat sell outs " So "
Repulican Thugs " So "
$22/barell to 1″ So "36/barell " So "
7 years of lies " So "
Cia outing of plame " So "
Constituional oath " So "
F–k Dick Cheny Tratitor Hang Him " So "
Oil " So "
9/11 trade towers fall at the speed of grity " So "
3000 New Yorkers Dead " So "
NY Fire Fighters Dead " So "
NY Police Dead " So "
Fear propaganda " So "
4000 GI Deaths " So "
70000 GI Injuried " So "
600000 Iraqis Dead " So "
2000000 Iraqis Displaced " So "
1 Trillion Dollars debt " So "
2 Illegal Wars " So "
Warrantless Surveilance " So "
Torture of Americans " So "
Torture of anybody " So "
Poor Vetren Health care " So "
Democrat sell outs " So "
Repulican Thugs " So "
$22/barell to 136/barell " So "
7 years of lies " So "
Cia outing of plame " So "
Constituional oath " So "
F–k Dick Cheny Tratitor Hang Him " So "
We've been living under the rule of a bunch of flim-flam men and snake oil salesmen. Simple as that. P.T. Barnum said it best when he declared, "There's a sucker born every day."
Anybody who continues to fall for flim-flam men and snake oil salesmen is a sucker, plain and simple. Until we wake up, wise up and stop allowing people like this to take over our lives, we'll continue to have the same problems over and over and over again.
We allowed our current administration to slither into the White House and we've failed to make accountable those who put them there and those who have condoned their crimes, either implicitly or explicitly. If we don't do something to correct this situation before it's too late, we'll have only ourselves to blame for what lies ahead.
If completed, the Turkmenistan-Afghanistan-Pakistan-India pipeline (TAPI) will export gas and later oil from the Caspian basin to Pakistan's coast where tankers will transport it to the West.
Eric, old boy, having caught up with that fact that it's about oil, you still don't seem to understand that it's about CONTROLLING the stuff, not the stuff itself. The tankers will deliver it wherever the controllers determine the highset profits are to be had. The pipeline just ensures that the decision making gets handled via the "right" controllers. Frankly, however, I wouldn't be too confident about totally secure control over that entire routing, expecially the Pakistan part of it.
This is all about eliminating the competition. It quite simple really and was stated by an Exxon executive when he was asked why Exxon would not invest more money in providing more oil to existing world markets.
He stated that the Oil was worth more in the ground and that by maintaining control over the existing resources while at the same time not processing and shipping it, Exxon made more money as its share values incresed.
If tomorrow of a sudden Exxon suddenly is seen as the "Owner" of 30 billion barrels in Iraq, then they see the value of the company leapfrog by some 5 trillion dollars.
They do not want State owned Oil in Iraq, Iran or Venezuala to compete with them. Just as they wanted to see Russias oil monopolized by the same cartels.
If a Turkmenistan, a new Government in Iran, one in Iraq decide someday in the future they must renationalize because they are being looted, the US Government need simply proclaim them as terrorists and launch another of their preemptive wars. (See Africom)
Don't expect lower prices. Indeed a bit of terrorism and bombing of pipelines will be welcomed by the Exxons and the Shells and by extension the US Government.
The Government will use this to keep Americans in fear pointing out that it proof that the terrorists still want to kill Americans. The Oil Companies can simply watch as Oil futures rise after each attack.
"The ugly truth behind the Iraq and Afghanistan wars finally has emerged."
Give him the Investigative Reporter of the Year Award. Sorry, but this is really cutting-edge shit!
Charles Krauthammer, argues for opening up ANWR to drilling in Nat Review Online's article: 'McCain's Energy Plan Only A Partial Fix' (NRO:http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2008/06/20/opinion/main4198661.shtml).
And there, he say's these sweet words:
"Since the moratorium was instituted, we've had two wars in the Middle East, and in between a decade of garrisoning troops in Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, Bahrain, Qatar, and the UAE to preserve the peace and keep untold oil riches out of the hands of the most malevolent of our enemies. "
Translation? Our troops have died for oil. Straight from the neocons mouth.
'Freedom isn't free', and the particular freedom Krauthammer has in mind is your freedom to drive a Hummer to your neighbor's soldier-son's funeral. Question now: are those the same freedom's WE are willing to fight and die for?
Eric Margolis, sorry, it is worth repeating.
By comparing Poppy Bush's 6 months or so buildup time for the Kuwait invasion to the less than 1 month interval between 9/11/01 and the 10/7/01 Afghanistan invasion, it was obvious at the time that there was a military operation in place waiting to go.
If you can control the oil and gas you can dictate the policies of disobediant governments. Look for evidence of big oil support of the Iraq invasion and you'll probably come up empty. picture yourself driving through Bagdad in a pick-up with an exxon-mobile logo on the door. Big oil has no interest in doing business in areas of conflict. Even if the wells are in remote secure areas, security of the pipe lines will be a problem. I'm not sure these contracts are doable in the near future.
I use to think that the Taliban part of the war on terror was legit. After reading this, in particular the parts about the 1998 pipeline deal, the Taliban and Osama, I'm not so sure anymore. So the whole "war on terror" was about oil? God help Bush/Cheney.
I also have a different perspective on 9/11 now.
The United States has never been a democracy and has a long history of crushing democracies all over the world.
Once the Oil Companies are done with the Congress they have paid for, they will be looking for a buyer. Maybe the People can place a bid.
Some people here are never happy. Yes, what Eric Margolis is writing about is not news to people who have taken the trouble to keep up, but the string of facts he presents here will be news to many people who get their news from big media.
Margolis consistently writes the real story, and has a wide readership in a good quality Canadian paper.
So if the critics here really care about these issues, what's with the condescending criticism? Do they really want the few good writers, like Margolis, to keep quiet?
Way back when, at the start of the Iraqi invasion, Charlie Rose was interviewing someone (forgot name) who implied that the invasion was primarily about securing Iraqi oil. Charlie snickered and with a condescending laugh said (paraphrase)"You're not really saying this is about oil?", then promptly moved on to another question.
Five years later it's mentioned in the Toronto Sun? like it's news? "The ugly truth......finally has emerged"? Aren't journalists trained to inquire, investigate, suspect everything, and search for the truth? What the f*#k are they doing??
Meanwhile the Blackwater thugs are going to have their work cut out, www.iags.org/iraqpipelinewatch.htm
allthumz June 22nd, 2008 1:10 pm
Welcome to the party ... grab a drink and get ready for the Iran Plan...
They should just skip the slogan-of-the-decade (War on Communism, War on Japs, War on Hitler, War on Drugs, War on Terror) - and get to the essence:
War on Enemies
This way, the T-shirts and TV logos can last longer.
More on this. When the bombs were first falling on Baghdad, when the Pentagon planted 'military advisors' were monopolizing CNN and all the other US media, who was telling the truth on CBC, Canada's biggest network? Eric Margolis made regular appearances, alternating with Gwynne Dyer, another of Canada's best war journalists.
Common Dreams gives a good distillation of the real news, so that's why I come here. But there sure are a lot of egotisical know-it-all malcontents doing the comments. Why don't you get constructive and make a real contribution?
Shadow government NSA black budget operations? From "Bin Laden determined to attack inside the U.S." to "My Pet Goat"? Unaccounted for billions of dollars lost in Iraq and in the Pentagon's budget? No-bid contracts for oil operations in Iraq? Executive privilege or corporatocracy? Bringing democracy to Iraq? See Tom Engelhardt's "The Greatest Story Never Told" - http://www.commondreams.org/archive/2008/06/16/9653/
That these wars have been all about US domination of the Persian Gulf and complete control of its oil supplies is nothing new. That it's finally in print and out there for anyone to see is. Democracy never had anything at all to do with setting the Middle East aflame with war. It was all about domination of those countries and exploitation of their oil resources. Imagine if we no longer needed oil to fuel our oversized SUV's. Imagine if we could invest all of our resources to our best and brighest minds in order to create alternative, environmentally friendly and renewable fuel sources. Imagine completely divorcing ourselves from the tyranny of the Saudi oil sheikhs, who smile at us publicly and behind our backs wreak havoc on the world by their manipulation of oil supplies and prices.
We've become such slaves to oil that it seems as if we're completely in thrall to Saudi Arabia. It's bad enough that between them and China, our country has been largely sold off and that both of those countries, in effect, own us lock, stock and barrel, and if they ever wished to recoup the debts we owe them, it would break us financially and destroy our already tottering economy that Bush has, in 8 short years, managed to all but destroy.
It's time to reinvent the engine that powers our vehicles. The internal combustion engine isn't all that efficient when it comes to how it powers a vehicle. There are other alternatives that could be used that would be so much better and more efficient, and there are still the possibilities of inventing some new kind of engine that wouldn't require the use of oil/gas to fuel it. It just take the willpower to do it. If we don't want to be practically enslaved to the Arabs, then we'd better get down to business and find a way to get ourselves free from the tyranny of oil, and not a day too soon, either.
Good for Margolis and Dyer and CBC, my disgust is with US media, not Canadian. Most Americans don't watch or listen to Canadian news.
Good one Sally. The whole North American infrastructure is built around the automobile, which corporate America has managed to stylize as it's version of 'material freedom'. America is so bound to a material existence that it craves freedom from it, and the automobile has been the solution offered by corporations who want nothing other than to press more materialism. The automobile, the way it's used and promoted, creates conflict in the American psyche. 'Get away from it all in something you can't get away from'.
So yes, a whole new model for living life is needed, and the first step is to get rid of the corporations. Can't be done? You bet it can.
New car "CITY CAT" soon to be manufactured in India. Exciting new compressed air vehicle. Check it out.
As much as all this is true, the author fails to mention the fact that ever since the ban on Cannabis which could have saved us from all this hell on dependence on foreign oil, America has gone to one war for oil after another. When will the Left quit complaining and connect the dots? It\'s bad enough that even so-called progressives and liberals badmouth hemp as \"pot\". The day America overturns the ban on hemp and puts its focus and investment in plant oils in general along with wind, solar, water (and by the way, what about the Japanese auto inventions that rely solely on water and no petroleum?), etc ... is the day these wars for oil will die down. Until then, keep complaining and keep writing us off for trying to help get America out of its wars for oil lunacy.
Eric Margolis, thank you for this to-the-point and articulate article. It pretty much sums up the facts.
i know what eric margolis is saying.......since the truth cannot be hidden anymore, you are going to hear people in high places talking abut the REAL REASON we went to war in iraq and afghanistan.....they will talk openly because they NO LONGER HAVE TO WORRY ABOUT BEING INDITED FOR HIGH CRIMES AND GOING TO PRISON.....since the iraq oil contracts have now been signed,they can talk as much as they want......
It seems to me that America overthrew a Middle East democracy for the British over oil - then we kept the Irani oil for ourselves.
http://www.votestrike.com/
Malfoyd June 22nd, 2008 1:50 pm -- "But there sure are a lot of egotisical know-it-all malcontents doing the comments."
Oh c'mon. That's a rather egotistical remark in itself, don't you think. Critical comment is the name of the game here and I'm sure Eric is quite accustomed to it. Besides, if we didn't love him, we wouldn't bother helping him to clarify his analytical oversights, some of which are not unimportant. :^)
No news here, but it needs to said again and again. Strip the system bare to see the abuse by naked power. As the world sinks slowly in its human morass, rich US oil investors are trying to make billions of dollars from the deaths and torture of millions of people. Anyone profiting, working for, or holding shares in these companies buying into Iraq,that is Exxon Mobil, Shell, BP and Total, is a complicit mass murderer and oil terrorist.
Anybody who needs to be told that it was about oil all along won't believe it not matter what.
" Let's be realistic. Afghanistan and Iraq are about oil, nothing else."
Duh.
The nature of that threat--terrorism--doesn't compare with the threat offered by the Nazis, Japanese, and Russians. The Muslims are a miserable backwash hampered by a medieval religion and totalitarian governance. They are more a danger to themselves than to us.
And if it weren't for the oil beneath those sands is there anyone here that thinks our troops would be there now?
Arvy,
Thanks for admitting his value on these issues.
Often I read unfair criticisms against people who have a good, positive messages, or give clear facts about the reality of what's going on.
It makes me wonder about the origin of those criticisms. When they are complaining about abuse of political power, I agree, but then when the same people complain about opposition to the abuse, I think maybe those critics are simply malcontents - ready to complain about anything.
It is best to accept honest statements, even if they aren't phrased exactly the way we would phrase them ourselves. Maybe we wish they would go further. Or maybe we think they should have emphasized different points.
The reality is that we need all the help we can get. Things are seriously wrong, and I'm truly grateful for anyone who will educate people about it.
George Montbiot recently made a bold attempt to make a citizen's arrest of the former US Ambassador to the UN, John Bolton for war crimes. It didn't work, and some criticized him for doing it a different way than they would have done it. But he did something. That's what matters. His actions will inspire others. That's important.
"Four major western oil companies, Exxon Mobil, Shell, BP and Total are about to sign U.S.-brokered no-bid contracts to begin exploiting Iraq's oil fields. Saddam Hussein had kicked these firms out three decades ago when he nationalized Iraq's oil industry. The U.S.-installed Baghdad regime is welcoming them back."
Woohoo! MISSION ACCOMPLISHED!!!
Perestroika Pie
Share your plunder black Don, to be
time for new Mc glasnost wonder
Genghis ....
he would be so proud
but could he turn that oil to water?
or just spew new
lust to lust or dust to dust chants
in the fertile black water valley
where
terra not so firma any more...
so fleshy
it jiggles in rapacity
like a Dubai sexless city
and black lust and more fertile dust
can better ponder profit
while prophets ponder
new hope hummer harvest songs
and fresh new tones of change
Share your plunder black Don
time for new Mc glasnost wonder
time for perestroika pie
More wood on the fire - that 911 was an inside, false flag job to kick off the party for bushCON and his oily buds.
We are witness's to history, front seat occupiers to man's insanity, that the golden rule is all that matters.
He who owns the gold (oil) makes the rules. The rest of us, just observers, witness's, bag holders, dupes, victims.
Someone stop this ride, I want to get off
Malfoyd June 22nd, 2008 4:46 pm:
Some unquestionalby valid points. I'll certainly concede the probability of there being a considerable percentage of malcontents within the CD populace. In fact, I guess I'd have to count myself among them.
I suppose it's also true that our disgruntlement is sometimes misdirected, although I try my best to include at least some positive input for consideration, tempered with as much good humor as possible. In this case, I believe it's quite important to recognise that the petro-resources control issue involves much more than mere tanker transport to the West as its end stage. If I seemed to be tweaking Eric Margolis' nose a bit in saying so, it was certainly not without recognition of his many contributions.
In the more general defence of us malcontents, on the other hand, I have to wonder aloud where the world would be without us and our egotistical urges to be heard? Any governmental opposition to the status quo seems quite minimal.
It's always been about oil. Remember "Three Days of the Condor?" Redford, 1975?
"Joe Turner: What does Operations care about a bunch of damn books? A book in Dutch. A book out of Venezuela. Mystery stories in Arabic.
Atwood: Wait!
Joe Turner: What the hell is so important about...
[He stops as he sees the connection]
Joe Turner: Oil fields. Oil. That's it, isn't it? This whole damn thing was about oil! Wasn't it? Wasn't it?
Atwood: Yes, it was."
Ironically, good ole Dick Cheney was Ford's Chief of Staff in 1975, when TDOTC was released...
Last year, Turkmenistan saw the death of Saparmyrat Nyyazow, a.k.a. "Papa", who ran a dictatorship understood as the weirdest and most oppressive of the post-Soviet years. The "election" of Gurbanguly Berdimuhamedow (Papa's dentist and reportedly also his bastard son) resulted in some openness in Turkmenistan, including removing Papa's image from the streets, the TV, and the vodka bottles, and ending the ritualistic Papa worship that was common until last year. The number of energy deals Turkmenistan has made since Papa's death has increased and there are concerns that Turkmenistan is making these deals but has no capacity to fulfill them. TAPI is included.
Europe is Turkmenistan's primary energy concern, with a pipeline planned beneath the Caspian Sea that will offer Europe a choice of something besides Russian gas. Europe is closer to Turkmenistan than is the US; so, Margolis's portrait of Turkmenistan's gas freely flowing to the US through Afghanistan and Pakistan -once those pesky insurgencies are resolved- is quite misleading and far too optimistic to be taken very seriously.
Margolis correctly says that TAPI is complicated by an Iranian pipeline deal, but he cannot conceal his disgust at Iranian attempts to exploit their own natural resources. The Iran deal is embraced by the entire region (including Afghanistan and India) and is far from "scuttled". The US-India "civilian nuclear energy deal" that flopped this year was meant to provide India with an alternative to Iranian gas. When the US urged India not to deal with Iran, India spurned the US and the nuclear deal has stalled since. So, India isn't exactly "cock a hoop over the new pipeline plan".
Margolis is misleading in saying that "nothing else" is involved here beside the US being interested in energy and having to protect these interests whether we like it or not. At the least, Margolis's viewpoint is Western-centric and meant to bolster support for TAPI, a non-practical, US brokered fantasy. If Margolis was really interested in Afghanistan's investment portfolio, he could have mentioned that the China Metallurgical Group last month signed a $3 billion deal for development of the Anyak Valley copper mines. The deal was Afghanistan's largest ever, twice the size of GDP for all 2007, and it will be underway long before TAPI. (Page, Jeremy. "Barren and bleak, a valley of death may be the $88bn key to a better life", London Times, 5/16/08).
Margolis is really saying that the "unworldly" Taliban are a "legitimate" target like al Qaida, and that "energy protection" is a fine cover under which to neutralize these targets along the "pipeline route" (which includes the Federally Administered Tribal Areas between Afghanistan and Pakistan). He slips these propagandistic phrases into a commentary on global energy and attempts to raise awareness of (the unpractical) TAPI as a solution to problems he pretends to be angry about. Margolis acts upset about the "ugly truth" of US imperialism, but without this truth, he would really begin thirsting for new material to use in his column.
John Sullivan June 22nd, 2008 1:19 pm
Exactly. It is as apparent that this country (usa) has never been about "democracy" as the fact that the current Iraqi Occupation has always been about the "oil".
" As American analyst Kevin Phillips writes, the U.S. military and its allies have become an "energy protection force." Fair enough as a speculative analysis with regard to the areas in question, but only after they first become an "energy acquisition force."
The war is about oil - partly. But look for the deeper truth. How did this invasion get such bipartisan support in Congress? Why does the executive director of AIPAC, Howard Kohr say, in Jan 2003, that-
"quietly lobbying Congress to approve the use of force in Iraq" was one of "AIPACs successes over the past year"? (see The Israel Lobby by Mearsheimer and Walt p242)
Why were former Israeli prime ministers Benjamin Netanyahu, Ehud Barak and Shimon Peres, as well as the then current Israeli prime minister Ariel Sharon, actively pushing America to invade Iraq (see The Israel Lobby by Mearsheimer and Walt p234)? I don't know of any other country twisting America's arm to invade.
Now ask why White House neocon advisers, invasion advocates and leading bogus intelligence spinners, Perle, Feith and Wurmser, as members of a right-wing Israeli think tank, 5 years before the invasion, advised the incoming Israeli Prime Minister Bibi Netanyahu to-
"focus on removing Saddam Hussein from power in Iraq-an important Israeli strategic objective in its own right".( 'Clean Break' report June 1996, as per ref. The Israel Lobby by Mearsheimer and Walt p239).
For Israel, certainly, AIPAC leader, Howard Kohr, can claim "success".
"Four major western oil companies, Exxon Mobil, Shell, BP and Total are about to sign U.S.-brokered no-bid contracts to begin exploiting Iraq's oil fields. Saddam Hussein had kicked these firms out three decades ago when he nationalized Iraq's oil industry."
That is not true. Saddam used Iraq's wealth to BUY Iraq's own resources from western oil companies. Those oil companies were PAID sufficient money for resources that rightfully belonged to Iraq, in any case, and they gladly accepted the deal. The problem with that is that, have sold Iraqi oil resources back to Iraq, the oil companies started eying them off once again.
Now the oil companies are to once again be GIVEN these oil resources. Talk about having your cake and eating it too.
* Got it for nothing.
* Sold it to Iraq.
* Now they get it for nothing again. Lucky them.
"That aint workin...
Thats the way you do it!
Money for nothing
and your chick for free..."
@markbinoz June 22nd, 2008 8:06 pm
What you say is true.
Was is for oil, or was it for Israel?
I remember having a debate with one who posts on ICH under the name Atheo. I argued that the invasion and occupation was for oil. He pointed out the zionist role. I ended up having to concede a lot of points:-
* the role of AIPAC having the ability to control campain donations through control of money through banks and businesses.
* free all expenses holidays for politicians and their entourages to Israel,
* the zionists in PNAC whose documents were copied to become official US policy.
* The role of Zionist Rupert Murdoch.
* zionists occupy key positions in each of the other large media organisations.
Atheo, in his own style conceded no points, but he should of. Because Bush, Cheney, Rumsfield and Rice all have major oil ties and investments. The whole thing would not have happened if it were not in their interests too.
For confirmation of this article, see Greg Palast's book, ARMED MADHOUSE, in which is delineated actually TWO Bush/Cheney Administration Iraq Attack Plans made WELL BEFORE 9/11 - which incident may well be a false-flag superblack op to forward the warplans/powergrab via a 'new Pearl Harbor'. After all, it is now obvious that Bush and Cheney do not mind dead Americans so long as the killings advance their plans.
But NO plans were made to assist the Iraq people in the aftermath of the war (this is itself a war crime under the Geneva Conventions)... so much for the Bush/Cheney/McCain "concern" for the "freedom" of the Iraq people, who have only been given the freedom TO DIE OFF.
And McCain should be Publicly asked how many -Million- Iraq refugees would he as President admit to America during his Iraq War???
No plan of the aftermath was instituted by Bush (other than to leave Iraq to the tender mercies of the free market and free trade by Bremer/Kissinger- and Iraq has become THE PERFECT EXAMPLE OF THE ACTUAL RESULT OF "FREE" TRADE and "FREE" MARKETS and the RULE of the GUN), because Bush and Cheney really do not give two shits together about Iraquis. All their cronies and buddies are amply served by the attack and occupation itself - Big Oil, Zionism, Fundamentalism, Big Money, the Military-Industrial Complex, CorpoFascism, Republicanism, Chauvinism, NeoConservatism, Neo'Liberalism', etc... again, see ARMED MADHOUSE.
The Secret Cheney Energy Task Force, back in Year One (2001) of the Beast Bush("..and to the people of Iraq I say, DO NOT destroy the OIL WELLS {when we attack with Operation Iraq Liberation.. O.I.L.}" -Bush), targeted Iraq for destruction, desolation, and occupation for the total hijack-robbery of its oil... but Bush just can't come right out and say the truth of 'we need the oil, we take the oil, and we'll fuck over anyone in the way'. That is why it is necessary to keep the Cheney Cabal/Energy Task Force Top Secret all these years.
And to finance the war, Bush/Cheney and the NeoCons have Destroyed the value of the American currency, so... no taxes for the SUPERWEALTHY SUPERNATIONAL UBER-KLASSE, but the little people of America EAT IT by the Secret Tax of Devaluation of the dollar, arranged by the FEDERAL RESERVE. Tar and Feathers for NeoCons Greenspan and Bernanke are in order.
Bush... WORST... PRESIDENT... EVER! ANYONE who votes for Bush II/McCain, should be locked up in a madhouse for the good of the nation and the world, or what is left of it.
And a good metaphorical book for our situation might be Frank Herbert's DUNE, about total genocidal war on a desert world for the mining rights to the most precious substance of the universe, without which the transit of space would come to a halt. Our 'spice' is of course, oil. The Bushites would be represented in the book by the conniving, untrustworthy, evil Harkonnen nation-tribe, whose depraved Baron holds a despicable philosophy of raw power and perverted morality summed up in his Bush/Cheney-like comment:
"He who controls the Spice, controls the Universe!"
l am shocked and appalled l was sure we were there to bring the joy of truth, justice and the promise of life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. Well what do l know?
New words to Gilbert and Sullivan's uneven but ambitious work, appropriately named "Utopia Ltd"
Act 1 Finale: Zara, the daughter of the king of Utopia, introduces the "flowers of progress" from not Great Britain in this version, but the USA. I am sure Gilbert would see how the US has usurped 'Great Britains' role, and would have done a better job with the words. Its quite a common practice to bring some of the words up to contemporary situations. The music is some of Sullivan's best. The US representatives [ a bunch of shady characters] are going to educate the Utopians about how to be part of and emulate the empire. I
Zara:
When U S blows the trump of war and Persia trembles.
The army of the conquerors zombies assembles.
Tis then this the generals eyes and medals gleam in seeming perfection.
He represents a military scheme for the racketeers protection.
Chorus: [ Exuberantly ]
America! America! America!
Zara: [ Introduces Dick Cheney ]
A complicated gentlemen allow me to present,
Of all the arts and faculties the terse embodiment.
He's a great Arithmetician who can demostrate with ease,
That two and two are three or five, or anything you please.
An eminent logician who can make it clear to you,
The black is white when looked at from a proper point of view.
A marvelous philologist who'll undertake to show,
that "yes" is but another and a neater form of "no".
Chorus: [ Exuberantly ]
Dick Cheney! Dick Cheney! Dick Cheney!
Dick Cheney:
All declarations that I give are like the word of god.
And demonstrate my will to power, and all else go to sod.
I say they hide their weapons when defences are no more,
When they are weak from sanctions we can blast with shock and awe.
Zara: [ Introducing President Bush ]
what these may be Americans, perhaps you'll hardly guess,
They're types of US physical and moral cleanliness.
This is the president, of purity so slick,
He'll clean the congress from moral stain, because he is so thick.
Chorus: Yes! Yes! Yes!
Zara: [ nice waltz tune ]
His congress glows as patriots, supports the troops and contract trash.
New funds are passed and sent away, to purify the cash,
The democrats we do acclaim, the rich folks latest toy.
On anything you like to name, no talents they'll employ.
[Introduces Nancy Pelosi]
This is a leading democrat, she won't say boo or tush
She'll clean the congress from moral stain, and purify the cash.
[Introduces Wall street political financier]
A company promotor this, with special education,
Which teaches what mortgage means, and also sub-primation.
To speculators he supplies a good financial scheme,
Time was when laws could stop this, but he's on the legal team!
Financier:
Yes! Yes! Yes!
Time was when laws could stop this but I'm on the legal team!
Supendous loans to companies, Ive largely advocated,
In real estate and Enron shares I've freely speculated.
Through internet and bubbles bold, successfully I've floated,
And sudden falls before the drop I've occassionally quoted.
And soon or late I always call for an insider quotation,
No schemes too great and none too small for tax-free liquidation.
Chorus: Yes! Yes! Yes!
Zara: [Introduces General Paetrous]
And lastly I present Great Americas proudest boast,
Who pre-empts, invades, and turns foes into burnt toast.
And if you ask him in respectful tone,
He'll show you how to strip nations to the bone,
General:
I'm General Paetrous, the USA army bold
I'll teach you how we anglos rule the world.
And terrify the simple Arab.
And how the anglo race has delt, the Arab, missiles and planes have felt,
With phosphorus and depleted Uranium, We've dropped bombs over all of them.
If to our rapacity you'd like to join in some capacity,
Tear up international laws, and make evidences fake
Join our troops, you'll never want for oil to take.
Though we're no longer nice at heart, Yet we can act and play a part,
And thanks to radio and TV, We're never called a criminal.
Chorus: What never?
General: No, never
Chorus: what never?
General: Well , hardly ever, We're never called a criminal.
Chorus:
Then, give 3 cheers and one cheer more
For the hirelings of their media core.
[worshipfully]
Sieg Heil, Sieg Heil!
Ye types of Americas Power,
Ye Heaven enlightened band
We bless the day, and bless the hour,
That brought you to our land.
Like it or not Margolis has clout, even for those posters here that dismiss Canada as inconsequential. I think he is rather late with his expedition to the obvious but nevermind, he is a barometer of world opinion--why? Because he has some international cred, with a military background (in the U.S.), and when he feels free enough to finally say what he undoubtedly knew years ago.. well then it is news, even if it is yesterday's for most of us.
World opinion matters, and he, and Gwynne Dyer, another military analyst (a Canadian even), influence world opinion, and it matters, since the US has caved in and allowed a group of thugs to play a very dangerous game of "chicken" with the world...
Guess what? The "world" does not like it, and it is very strange to be in bed with the Chinese and Russians, but compared with this criminal cabal in Washington the old adage "the enemy of my enemy is my friend" has startling new relevance. The U.S. is reviled globally. Dubya's game of RISK ended up a total fiasco, millions dead, and I really doubt the US--in spite of the millions down there that feel the revulsion the rest of us outside feel--can repair its constitution, and rejoin the civilised West where torture and rendition are considered thuggish, illegal, and a terrible stain on your national honour. It may be too late.
What WE out here want an is end to is this gun held to the planet's head in the form of massive U.S nuke delivery capability, and Israeli nukes, and a rogue regime that is run by a mendacious psychopath, or by a malevolent "neo-con" Weltanschauung that pulls the strings of this war-criminal president. If war with Iran happens, it will be the worst global disaster since the German war of aggression on Poland in 1939... only worse.
You poor Americans starve while the weapons industry arms up in 2008, spending almost as much on "national defense" as the rest of the world combined? Against who? YOUR country is the global terrorist, the rogue state that we all fear. You can't possibly beleive the propaganda, once again, that a country like Iran (like Iraq before it) is any threat to anyone? It's about oil and power. It is the new Great Game. And it is going to be worse than the last round because the "blowback" from the darker-skinned natives you presume to fuck around is going to be beyond your worst nightmares. Your gas price hike is the tip of the wedge. It will get much much worse unless you remove the criminal cabal in Washington. The world, collectively, loathes this man more than any "leader" since Hitler.
Margolis irritates me at times, with his marine pedigree, his name-dropping, and conservative aura... but he can nail a truth and has been around. If the world sees the US in a way such that professional commentators can at last say what they think, it is not something necessarily hopeful to me--it could easily drive the maniacs in Washington and Tel Aviv to unleash the unthinkable.
And no, I am not anti-American. I invite all would-be US imperialist foot-soldiers to come to Canada as with Vietnam. Why be a stooge for a regime with no honour for an oil-grab scheme? Our Conservaative government will be tossed out of office soon and new legislation will allow you to escape persecution for yet another unjust, illegal, imperialist U.S. "undeclared" war against a third world country. It will allow you to avoid having the searing stain of playing a part--direct or supportive--in the most sickening war crimes against innocent men, women and children imaginable. It could even save your life. It is something you could be proud of.
The offer is also extended to people, lefties like myself, who can't handle the new crypto-fascist regime that has appeared there, the heavy police presence and violent suppression of legitimate peaceful protest. Seriously, it may not get better. Soon, at least.
Think about it.
DR-Montreal
That these wars were about oil and gas and pipelines to carry oil and gas was known before the wars even began - just ask the 10 million people worldwide who protested the wars before hand. Of course, it was also about making the people who own shares in energy companies and military contractors rich (that is, members of the Bush regime and their close personal contacts) and expanding the US empire. Any of the moral and humane arguments were all hypocritical lies used to sell the war.
As for the comment about the US helping Britain overthrow the Iranian government after it nationalized oil. This was back in the 1950's. It was an operation run by Kermit Roosevelt who then became the head of Gulf Oil after they "obtained" the oil rights from the newly installed government of the Shah. So yes, it was about oil back then as well.
And, of course, the first Gulf War was about oil as well. Do you think the US and the other coalition members would have been there if the national product of Kuwait was broccoli instead of oil? Of course, if it had been broccoli then Kuwait would have never been invaded in the first place.
That it's been about oil is so "even a moron with half a brain knows it" obvious that it's amazing that anyone even tries to deny it. Everyone knows what it's about, whether they admit it or not.