Truth or Consequences -- The Real Life Version
With gas prices sky-rocketing towards $5 a gallon, food costs going through the roof, the worst Midwest floods in decades and soaring temperatures in most of the rest of the country, life is feeling more than just a little crazy this summer. In fact, it's verging on the surreal.
Life today feels a bit like Truth or Consequences -- the popular game show that ran on radio and then TV from the 1940s until the 1970s. In the show, contestants had to answer a wacky, off-the-wall question before a buzzer sounded. If they did not respond truthfully, players had to face the consequences by performing an unexpected and embarrassing stunt. Intended as light-hearted entertainment, this show was based on a deadly serious observation -- that there are often surprising consequences when we do not tell the truth.
Today, we may be playing a real-life game of Truth or Consequences. In this version, we have to tell the truth about how we are collectively harming the environment or face the unpredictable consequences. But unlike the game show, if we are not honest the consequences will affect more than just the willing contestants.
In the real-life game, we are being challenged to tell the truth about how our industrial growth-based society already threatens the environment and our health. For example, are we prepared to be honest about how over-consumption of many natural resources is endangering the survival of other cultures and species? Are we ready to confess that widespread use of toxic chemicals is poisoning the planet and causing an epidemic of chronic disease? Are we ready to acknowledge that record greenhouse gas emissions resulted in the 2003 European heat wave which killed over 50,000 people? If not, the entire human species as well as countless others will have to face even greater unknown consequences in the future.
The consequences are unknown because no-one can precisely predict how the environment will react to the mounting stresses imposed on it by our collective way of life. The reason is simple: When ecological systems are stretched beyond their breaking point they become extremely unpredictable. For instance, increasing levels of pollutants led to the rapid and unexpected "death" of Lake Erie in the 1960s. Similarly, severe over-fishing in the Northern Atlantic caused the once-productive cod fishery to collapse completely in the 1990s with very little warning.
There is only one sensible way to cope with this uncertainty -- we need to reduce the risk of catastrophe by changing the very nature of industrial growth-based societies. To achieve social change on this massive scale more people need to speak up about how we are destroying the planet and harming our own health.
The mainstream media have a central role to play. Although TV and radio air more stories on the environment than they used to, they could go a lot further. Critically important information about the declining state of the environment is often drowned out by relatively superficial and trivial items. On one recent day, the national news headlines were dominated by stories about the posturing of presidential candidates and the alleged performance-enhancing drug use of baseball players. Although fascinating to many, these types of features do little to educate and inform people about the looming environmental crisis and what can be done about it. The mainstream media could learn a lot from the alternative media who routinely provide in-depth coverage about environmental issues.
But individuals must tell the truth too. Over the years, many have spoken up. In the early 20th century, Aldo Leopold vividly described the loss of American wilderness. And in the 1960s Rachel Carson was eloquent about the health effects of pesticides on wildlife. More recently, Al Gore has been extremely articulate about global warming. However, it isn't just leading environmentalists who can tell the truth. It's also you and me.
How can an ordinary citizen be heard? Speeches, articles, letters to the editor, and simply talking with friends and neighbors. But words alone are not enough. Living the truth in our daily lives is much more important than anything we speak or write. It's not enough to proclaim "global warming is happening"-- we need to reduce our own carbon footprint. Why would anyone listen to a sanctimonious lecture about climate change if we're preaching from the roof of a Hummer?
But at least people are beginning to discuss environmental issues with renewed interest. In fact, it's now very cool to talk about being green. Concern is at an all-time high, even higher than in 1970 when 20 million Americans took to the streets on the first Earth Day to demonstrate for a healthy environment. And some of us are doing a lot more than just talking about it. We are taking action by changing our lifestyles. Whether it's buying organic food, trading in SUVs for hybrids, taking the bus, eating vegetarian or drinking old-fashioned tap water instead of bottled water, more Americans are making environmental choices than ever before. But these choices aren't always simple or painless. They come with costs -- time, money, convenience or social status. As Kermit the Frog famously said, also in 1970, "it's not easy being green." But although it's still tough to live an entirely green lifestyle, many more are trying.
If we don't practice what we preach, we simply won't be credible. How can we tell our friends and neighbors that their choices are bad for the planet if we are not making better choices ourselves? Telling the truth through our deeds, as well as our words is essential. If we do not, the consequences will be unexpected, surprising and infinitely more serious than those of a light-hearted game show.
Kate Davies M.A., D.Phil. is Director of the Center for Creative Change at Antioch University Seattle. She has worked on sustainability for all of her career, focusing on the environment, health and social justice. Since moving to Seattle in 2002, she has served on state committees and is a member of several non-profit boards, including the Institute for Children's Environmental Health, Washington Citizens for Resource Conservation, and the Collaborative for Health and Environment Washington. Kate has received service and academic awards for her work, speaks regularly at local, regional, and national conferences, and writes on environmental health and social change. She is now working on a book provisionally titled "Making Change: Ideas, Values and Strategies for Building the New Progressive Movement."
Delicious
Digg
StumbleUpon
Newsvine
Facebook
Google
Yahoo
Technorati
11 Comments so far
Show AllI write to my Congressman and Senators on almost a weekly basis. I vote, often and generally not for the incumbents. I talk to others about voting, about issues. What good is it doing? The "leadership", dem and rep, seem more intent in driving this nation into the ground and taking the rest of the world with it.
The late George Carlin said that he doesn't vote and therefore has a right to complain about the crappy job that gets done. That's because for all the talk about WE the People, taking back our democracy... We the people keep putting the same crooks and charlatans into office who, we KNOW are more into servicing the REAL owners of America, rather than the masses. Yes, we need a serious wake-up call. Unfortunately, too many fundamentalists, of whatever stripe, see these coming times as justification of their "sacred" texts and that these are the End Times and are intent on helping it along. And the rest? The rest are too busy accepting the pablum that the "mainstream" media serves up and seem unable to question that media, let alone the government. The commentors on CD and other progressive blogs are exceptions but we are, in reality, few and far between.
Where ever possible, homes and commercial buildings should be fitted with solar collection panels. Suburban lawns should be turned into gardens and mini-farms. Excess packaging should be stopped immediately. Rural dumps (abandoned autos, machinery, appliances) need to be recyled.
Use rain barrels. Eat less. Walk more. Turn off your computer and read a book or make love.
We need to get beyond the finger pointing. Are cities really better than suburbs? City buildings are the most inefficient to heat and cool in existence. Suburban roads are very inefficient. An SUV driven twenty miles a week is not worse than a small car driven a hundred twenty miles a week. Everything is relative. Lets get past this pettyness and deal with the problem. Cities need to retrofit their heat holding and cold transmitting brick buildings to a higher resistance standard. Suburbanites need to switch to much more fuel efficient cars. Conservation not technology is the single most efficient immediate action that can be taken to slow global warming. So let's end the urban suburban bickering and get on with it.
I hope that there is some sort of international 'make america go broke on gas prices' conspiracy at hand, by non-warmongering countries. I can only hope they are onto something, peacefully.
'Self-heating buildings'?
Our house is designed to make as much use of solar energy as possible, but it is definitely NOT self heating, and we do have an excellent solar exposure and built as energy-efficiently as possible . . .
Cities really should abandon the archaic system of disposing of human waste by using perfectly good water and then having to treat the water, buildings should be designed with separate 'graywater' and 'blackwater' plumbing and the 'blackwater' should be routed to methane digesters for heat and energy needs . . .
A few little pods of recyclers won't save the planet. Can one person shut down a Walmart? Think! Can one person shut down a Walmart? Think... globally, act locally.
High fuel prices and the ripple outward are the wake up call that we've needed for years. It finaly cuts through the Distractorama when filling up your tank gets over $100. That's when people start to change behavior, driving less, etc. With food and fuel taking a bigger bite out of people's income, they are less likely to buy lots of disposable consumer crap that they don't need, reorder the priorities a bit.
If you imagine that everyone will do what you do, then envision the consequences of not eating meat anymore.
Here's my plan B:
First, try to form an extraparty majority of citizens, of the us and of the world. No more Republicans having 51% of the vote so they get 99% of the power, until the wave lurches to 49% of the vote and 1% of the power, back and forth until eternity.
Move toward proportional representation. Use it everywhere! Use it at student councils, at union locals, in Democratic primaries, get the idea out there. It gives you, the citizen, a much better deal. It empowers you.
Now, the governments of the world that aren't totally self-possessed will all agree to slap tariffs on those governments that don't care, until they start to cut their own carbon use. We're all in this together. Let's have an understanding now that pre-emptive carbon footprint lowering this year must be rewarded by the caring countries in the future.
Some of the methods of lowering fuel for electricity include wind power, floating turbines to power the U.S. East Coast, pumped hydro for storing excess electrity, and direct current high voltage lines, the safe kind that don't kill kids and cows with leukemia.
I see transit going automated and electric and above grade. My model is the elevator car: safe, driverless and electric.
Self-heating buildings aren't too hard. Get to work.
We need water vapor in the stratosphere to counteract global warming.
We need specific carbon sink farms and coral reefs to put it back in the ground or sea from the atmosphere.
"In the real-life game, we are being challenged to tell the truth..."
Well, then tell it: the possibility of 6 billion-plus humans working together towards a singular goal - especially given the short window of opportunity left - is non-existent. Have people stopped eating fast food? Smoking? Driving drunk?
Ignorance is no longer the problem - the vast majority of Americans, at least, understand the GW basics and simply do not care.
The real truth is this: we need to spend as much time preparing for the unknown consequences of GW as we do trying to slow it. For example - just look at what's happening in the MidWest - millions caught without a Plan B.
It's time to start putting together your Plan B...
Real change is up to US......................It always has been...WE HAVE THE POWER.....
http://www.votestrike.com/