Subscribe to Common Dreams News Updates
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
Rural Importance
Sixty million Americans, including Vermonters, live in the countryside. That's one-fifth of the nation. Yet through this lengthy political season, we have heard little about the needs of rural America from the candidates.
Earlier this week in Washington, D.C., more than 500 leaders from communities around the country met to come up with strategies to improve the well-being of rural America.
The National Rural Assembly considered four policy areas: education, health care, natural resources and investment. It has put forth something called the Rural Compact, a statement of principles about the importance of rural areas to the nation's economic and social health.
What follows are the four principles contained in the compact to build stronger communities and a stronger nation:
* Quality in Education: Every child should have an equal chance to learn, excel and help lead America to a better, brighter future. Education policy should recognize the distinctive challenges and opportunities for rural schools and reflect the unique needs of those students, families and educators.
* Stewardship of Natural Resources: Eighty percent of our country's land is rural. It is a heritage and a trust. We all have a responsibility to protect the environment and develop and sustain our natural resources in ways that strengthen rural communities for the long haul. Good environmental practices and responsive public land management provide the opportunity to promote energy independence, grow healthy food in a sustainable manner, mitigate climate change and develop stronger natural-resource-based economies.
* Health of Our People: All people in America deserve access to good, affordable health care. If we want small towns and rural communities to contribute to the well-being of the nation, we need rural health care systems that work. These should include preventive care, health education and both community-based and high-tech delivery systems.
* Investment in Our Communities: To fight poverty, create wealth and build sustainable communities, everyone in America needs access to a safe and equitable system for saving, borrowing and building capital. To fully participate in and contribute to the American economy, rural communities need public and private investment, access to philanthropic resources, and the tools to develop their own community-controlled assets.
These four principles, as stated in the Rural Compact, are simple and common sense policy goals that would benefit the whole nation, not just rural areas.
We think that urban areas take rural communities for granted. We know the politicians do. But the needs of city, suburb and countryside are interconnected. Cities and suburbs benefit when rural communities succeed. When rural areas slump, the nation as a whole suffers.
Facing enormous challenges in how we fuel and feed America in future years, we need to come up with a real rural policy that allows places like Vermont to make a contribution to the solutions we need. If you agree, go to www.ruralcompact.org and add your signature to the compact.
© 2008 Reformer
Comments
Due to trouble with browser compatibility, Common Dreams has reverted to the older version of Disqus for comments while they fix these problems.

8 Comments so far
Show AllIn rural land, as everywhere else, you get the trend of government policies described above from liberals, not from conservatives (who are too busy accumulating personal money and fighting taxes.) Why not just say so?
Rural USA must be very different from rural Canada. I have a 100-metre gravel driveway, a well and a septic-tank so am well-qualified to comment on life in the boonies.
The politics in rural Canada have been outright Conservative or large-C liberal for ever. This isn't all bad, it provides a counterbalance to the Liberal-dominated city electorates who shriek when they hear "hunting and trapping" and want chickens to have counselling before they give it up for dinner.
So I don't know where DD is coming from.
Other than that, I see your Golden Boy Obama has turned down 85 million beanos of public funding for the coming election.
He missed a beat here, he should have reassigned the money.
To rural poverty.
It would help if rural communities didn't keep voting for dimwits to represent them.
Really, Lizard?
Voters are smarter in the cities? Don't think so.
"Don't cuss the farmer with your mouth full"
Organic farming is growing in demand. It is much better suited to small diverse, labor intensive farming operations than Big Agribusiness is. If small farmers want to stay in business and actually make money, they need to become educated in the art and science of organic farming. Praying and waving the flag won't do it. They'll find all the answers online, or their children will.
From what I have observed, the rural communities are better off than the urban ones. The biggest worry in rural areas is the health care system, mainly keeping doctors in the area, and maintaining a hospital.
There have been many posts recently on the terrible practice of penning livestock up in small areas where they cannot have freedom to live a natural life. If that is true of animals, it is also true for humans, but we continue to pack people in cities like sardines and wonder why there is so much crime, discontent, and financial problems.
Our nation needs to reverse the trend from rural to urban lifestyle and get people back out where they can enjoy nature, instead of living in the malls blowing their money for unneeded items. People were not made to be constantly hooked to a computer, cellphone, Ipod, etc, while overconsuming junk food and soda.
Right on ezeflyer and Kernel!
There's real wisdom in your words here.
Listen up folks...
Thank you Lord Anthony for some realistic thoughts.
Organic farming certainly has its place, and many small farmers would indeed benefit from it, but it won't feed the country.
Its the abuse by the agri-business companies thats bad, not all their methods.