The 'Politics of Inclusion' Takes a Hit
A disgraceful thing happened at Detroit's Joe Louis Arena earlier this week. Americans were discriminated against by other Americans who thought head scarves would send the wrong message about their candidate's religious affiliation.
In other words -- the soft bigotry of Islamophobia is finally ready for its close-up in the Obama campaign.
Hebba Aref was born in the United States 25 years ago to Egyptian immigrants. She is a lawyer and a taxpaying citizen.
Ms. Aref is also an American Muslim, though there is some debate in this country whether her religious affiliation undermines her claim to be a "loyal American."
Ms. Aref and her friend, Shimaa Abdelfadeel, were among the 20,000 Americans who made the pilgrimage to downtown Detroit to cheer for presumptive Democratic presidential nominee Barack Obama in person.
For months, Mr. Obama has been traveling the country, assuring audiences that the success of his campaign is proof America is turning the corner on the politics of racial and religious suspicion.
Mr. Obama promises that he'll be an exemplar of a more inclusive politics. He insists that the old divisions of race, gender and religion that polarize our politics today will not find favor during an Obama administration.
So the question must be asked: Why were two Muslim women wearing hijabs told by Obama campaign workers that they couldn't sit behind the candidate during a televised speech because of the "sensitive political climate"?
On what planet would such cowardice and discrimination be consistent with a politics of inclusion?
The Obama campaign issued an apology as soon as the incident was reported: "It is offensive and counter to [our] commitment to bring Americans together and simply not the kind of campaign we run," the campaign statement read. "We sincerely apologize for this behavior."
Fair enough, but how did lowly campaign workers decide that Muslim head scarves weren't ready for prime time with Barack Obama?
Could it be that the Obama campaign's almost pathological fear of being associated with Islam when so many Americans continue to believe the candidate is a "secret Muslim" has trickled down to the ushers?
Ms. Aref understands Mr. Obama's sensitivity to being called a Muslim when he's a professing Christian, but it is hard not to detect a whiff of Islamophobia in the campaign.
"I don't want to be called something I'm not," Ms. Aref told an interviewer, "but I felt like everyone was treating this accusation of being Muslim as though it were some sort of crime or sin."
Because Ms. Aref lives in a state where Arab Americans have a modicum of political clout, she hasn't had to deal with the contempt for Islam by proudly ignorant politicians that we in Pennsylvania take for granted.
Chances are Ms. Aref has never seen the likes of state Rep. Daryl Metcalfe, R-Cranberry.
Earlier this week, Mr. Metcalfe voted against a ceremonial resolution recognizing the Ahmadiyya Muslim Community's convention in Harrisburg this weekend.
"The Muslims do not recognize Jesus Christ as God and I will be voting negative," he said, taking a break from fighting the last Crusades.
Mr. Metcalfe's colleagues couldn't do anything except roll their eyes and point out the silliness of imposing a religious test on House resolutions.
Meanwhile, the Muslim group's members will prove their greater patriotism by pumping lots of money into Harrisburg's economy anyway.
After she was snubbed, Ms. Aref asked for a personal apology from Mr. Obama, along with visible seating behind the presidential candidate during a future televised speech in her state.
While he's at it, Mr. Obama should also find a place on the stage for Jews wearing yarmulkes, Sikhs wearing turbans and atheists wearing evolution lapel pins, because they're all part of his grand coalition, too.
The incident with the Muslim women is troubling because it is the opposite of the political courage that Obama the candidate espouses.
If the Obama campaign is tempted to pander to anti-Muslim sentiment now, what is it going to do when it has to fight for votes in states where gay marriage is legal?
Will campaign workers fill the stage behind him with straight couples to mollify voters he'll never win? Is this a preview of the new politics Barack Obama has been talking about?
Tony Norman can be reached at tnorman@post-gazette.com.
© 2008 Pittsburgh Post-Gazette
Delicious
Digg
StumbleUpon
Newsvine
Facebook
Google
Yahoo
Technorati
14 Comments so far
Show AllChunga's Revenge June 20th, 2008 9:57 pm
Well said!
The question is, how do you get elected in a nation of fools?
It is not below the republicans for them to stage people as anything for any event that they can exploit.
This story is nothing but a distraction. A non-issue to get folks all wound up. There is plenty not to like Obama about with out this silly carping.
Obama has been filmed with Muslims several times, and apparently is so ashamed of it that he put the pics up on his website.
Saudi Arabia and other Islamic countries where Sharia law is followed consider homosexuality a capital offense. This can hardly be called "homophobia!"
Sorry you think I'm "making excuses for the inexcusable," but equating the positions of the Church of England and Islam on homosexuality is really odious.
"insulting" (or whatever)
It's insulting. And it has nothing to do with homophobia, which is not an exclusively islamic trait. Look at the Church of England tying itself into knots over the issue.
I find these examples of Obamacans making excuses for the inexcusable extremely disturbing. This isn't a rational political choice - it's a cult.
At the end of this article, the author asks: "If the Obama campaign is tempted to pander to anti-Muslim sentiment now, what is it going to do when it has to fight for votes in states where gay marriage is legal?"
In criticizing the Obama campaign workers' "insulting" (or whatever) treatment of the two Muslim women, Mr. Norman seems to have forgotten MUSLIM attitudes towards homosexuality. For progressives, it's not a pretty picture. Apparently he overlooked that when asking the question above.
Maybe Obama can use his influence to get the two ladies employment at Dunkin' Donuts.
Not surprisingly, this article fails to mention the fact that women in Muslim head scarves have previously been photographed standing behind Obama at his rallies, including just a couple of days ago in Michigan:
http://news.yahoo.com/nphotos/slideshow/photo/080618/photos_ts/2008_06_17t213910_450x318_us_usa_politi...
This fact WAS included in the original article that started all this, from politico.com but conveniently dropped from the Pittsburgh Post Gazette piece:
http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0608/11168.html
While the women in this story were rightfully horrified by the way they were treated, this was not the result of an organized effort by the Obama campaign to exclude Muslims from photo ops; it was the act of two extremely misguided campaign volunteers.
The Islamaphobia is not with the Obama campaign; it is with society in general, and it is exploited by cynical Repuglicans in order to hang on to power. That two low-level Obama campaign workers took it upon themselves to get the women out of the picture is wrong, wrong, wrong. BUT it is perfectly understandable given the fact that the Repugs continually attempt to smear Obama as a Muslim. It's a sad thing, indeed, that calling somebody a Muslim is a smear, but when a Repug says somebody is a Muslim we all know that they mean he is (1) a terrorist and (2) an inferior brown-skinned man. The Repugs are smart enough not to use overt racist epithets, but in this culture calling Obama a Muslim is just as good as calling him a N---er. The courageous stand in this case would have been to say, "To hell with the Repugs--I'm proud of ALL my supporters, come what may." The Obama campaign workers were guilty of cowardice, nothing more.
The only people to be seen sitting behind Obama ought to be tall, blond, blue eyed, athletic youths singing "God Bless America".
The Obama campaign has to thread a fine needle between being truly inclusive of all visual types appearing on his stage, and NOT including too many distracting opposition "plants" who might try to get those seats EVERY DAY for say, a new iteration of Limbaugh's Operation Chaos.
The staff muffed one apparently. Now it's national news.
So they'll now get as diverse as they can to avoid more criticism. But they still must discern "plants" when they see them. Not easy.
Obama will not change anything...he's the chosen one......
PLEASE STAND TOGETHER......
http://www.opednews.com/articles/Drop-Whatever-You-re-Doing-by-chris-rice-080618-207.html