Big Bad Boom
Radioactive DéjàVu in the American West
In the American West, we take global warming personally. Like those polar bears desperately hunting for dwindling ice flows, we feel we're on the frontlines of the new weather regime.
The West is drying up. For example, canyon-hugging conservationists and jet-boating gear-heads have argued for several years about whether to "drain" Lake Powell, the 200 mile-long reservoir that once drowned the redrock Eden which was Glen Canyon. But a funny thing happened on the way to debate -- Mother Nature drained it herself. Almost. The Utah reservoir is now reduced by half and the prospects of it ever reaching "full pool" again are less than dim. A recent Natural Resources Defense Council report suggests that Lake Mead, an even bigger reservoir downstream that feeds Las Vegas and Southern California, may be emptied by 2050.
Many desert denizens now view abandoned archaeological ruins like Chaco Canyon and Mesa Verde in the Southwest as more than the remnants of a collapsed, long-lost Anasazi civilization. They increasingly look like haunting hints of our own possible fate as global warming continues to bake the already arid West.
Ghost towns are nothing new in our boom-n'-bust history, of course, but imagine some future tour guide ushering visitors through the awesome ruins of Las Vegas's Circus-Circus, the Bellagio, or the Luxor Hotel. "They didn't understand the limits of the landscape that enfolded them," she might say, while holding up a golf-ball excavated from the ruins for the crowd to see. "When drought pushed them across the threshold, they didn't see it coming, they couldn't cope, and it all fell apart."
Here we go again... Unfortunately, it's not only the heat that's hitting us hard out here. One of the "solutions" to the crisis of climate chaos is about to kick the citizens of the West right in our collective gut before we even have a chance to go down for the count from heat exhaustion. Nuclear power -- once touted as a "solution" to other problems and recently resurrected -- is now being pushed hard as an alternative to carbon-dioxide emitting coal for keeping the lights on. And, unfortunately for us, its raw material, uranium, is right in our backyard.
So we in states like Utah, Nevada, Arizona, New Mexico, and Montana are poised for a mining boom reminiscent of the one in the 1950s when the nuclear age began. Then, the West's uranium mines provided the raw material for our metastasizing Cold War nuclear arsenal and the nation's first generation of nuclear reactors. (You remember Three Mile Island, don't you?) Back then, radioactive ore was often dug out by impoverished Navajo miners desperate for jobs. Many of them later sickened and died from exposure to radioactivity.
After uranium has been turned into "yellowcake," fit for further processing into reactor fuel, and then used to power a nuclear reactor, it is supposed to return to our Western landscapes in the form of "spent" nuclear fuel -- something that is lethally dangerous for tens of thousands of years. Our arid landscapes, we are told, are ideal for waste that must be kept isolated and dry for at least a thousand years.
In other words, we get it at both ends of the nuclear energy cycle -- and the drier we get, the more appealing we look. First, they dig a hole and take it out; then, they dig another and return it to the ground in far more dangerous shape. Lurking between the mines and the waste dumps are processing mills -- and, of course, we have them, too. Even as debris from toxic slag piles in the old mines and mills of the West is still blowing in the wind or leaching into our watersheds, new slag heaps are taking shape in the fevered dreams of the next generation of speculators.
By now you may have heard about Yucca Mountain, the multi-billion dollar facility under construction in Nevada. Yucca was supposed to be the designated repository for the nuclear energy industry's waste. It has been plagued, however, by faulty science, enormous cost overruns, fierce opposition from local "downwinders," and the problem of transporting all that dangerous nuclear waste across the nation. After years of local resistance and a torrent of bad press, the Yucca project has finally been stalled and, now a distant threat to public health and environmental integrity, is about to be overtaken by a far more clear and present danger -- a new uranium boom in the arid lands of the West.
A temporary town for a thousand uranium miners is already under construction at Ticaboo in southern Utah. It will remind old-timers here of the now popular tourist destination of Moab, which was essentially a trailer-park city for miners in the 1950s and Ground Zero for the first episode of what local historians label "uranium frenzy."
The newest uranium frenzy has opened with a PR campaign to convince a wary public that nuclear power should be an acceptable, if desperate, last-ditch option to stem the build-up of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere. It has convinced some former skeptics to take a second look at the potential value of non-carbon-dioxide emitting nuclear reactors. But, as Christian Parenti reports in The Nation, the debate about reviving and expanding nuclear power is quickly becoming moot in the United States, if not globally.
Bottom line: Wall Street won't invest because nuclear power is too expensive, too risky, too complex, takes too long to bring on line, and can't compete with other energy sources once massive tax-payer subsidies are removed from the equation. (Senators Joe Lieberman and John Warner have, however, proposed more than $500 billion in subsidies to double nuclear capacity in the decades ahead.) But those limitations will not dampen the radioactive rush in the West, especially since the planet's limited supply of uranium is ever more valuable on international markets -- which means mining and processing uranium ore will continue to defile some of our wildest landscapes.
Flimflam capitalism: Speculation makes the hearts of wannabe tycoons pound harder. Back in the 1950s, prospectors would begin a mine, bulldoze an airstrip, fly in potential investors, swing a Geiger-counter over ore that supposedly came out of that bit of ground and... well, you know how it ends, but, strangely enough, investors often don't. Scam or legit, there is money to be made simply in building up the infrastructure of speculative exploration.
Even dry holes can be lucrative for a short while. Economically impoverished and vulnerable locals welcome the temporary jobs and merchants want to sell to all those move-in drillers, heavy equipment operators, and miners. Local politicians, eager for access to the pie, will cut deals to open doors. In Utah, for example, two top legislators signed lucrative "consulting" contracts to pave the way for a developer to get the necessary water for a nuclear power plant and formal permission to build it somewhere in the state. Critics charge that the legislators also tried to get generous taxpayer subsidies to sweeten the pot.
The first phase of a mining boom is the rush to stake claims. In Colorado last year, 10,730 uranium mining claims were filed, up from 120 five years ago. More than 6,000 new claims have been staked in southeast Utah. Throughout the West, claims are up tenfold. Next comes exploratory drilling. That means carving roads across the wildlands to bring in equipment. Drilling teams will have no trouble financing their road-building adventures, since profits for the metals mining industry are up 1,400% in the past six years.
Such speculation is as basic to industrial capitalism as the raw materials that power its machinery. Witness the inflated fantasies of the recently punctured housing bubble. Even if the mines never materialize, the run-up will leave lasting scars, especially as the new uranium boom follows on the heels of an oil and gas boom, a desperate effort to wring every last drop of fossil fuel from the depleted reserves of the West.
Bulldozers first, four-wheeled locusts next, then dust in the wind: Like some devastating one-two punch, mineral development and motorized recreation are essentially guaranteed to create the next Great American Dustbowl. First, uranium prospectors bulldoze more roads to add to the thousands of miles of roads already carved across open Western lands in previous booms. Next, a horde of Off-Road Vehicle (ORV) riders take to them, causing more erosion and bio-degradation.
ORV ownership has expanded exponentially throughout the West and most of our deserts have already become weekend ORV theme parks. Those tens of thousands of untrained riders are barely regulated. Enforcement is a joke. They go where they wish and do what they please. Ecological devastation from the exploration and extraction cycle, already substantial, is aided and abetted by the inevitable crush of ORVs. As these riders braid new tracks through lands that otherwise qualify for wilderness protection, they may lose their standing forever, while already compromised wildlife habitats are further fragmented.
The thin and fragile soils of our deserts, barely held in place by a delicate microbiotic crust, have already been overgrazed and overrun. It can take twenty years to grow that protective microbial mat, but one spinning tire can destroy it in one second. If you live to the east of us, expect to see the dust under that "crypto" crust released into your air, as high desert winds churn it up and carry it away. Recent research concludes that snowpack in the Colorado mountains is melting earlier and faster due, in part, to dust blowing in from Utah and Nevada that covers the snow fields and absorbs heat. The Dustbowl, of course, is another old story. Unlike the dust storms of the 1930s, however, our Western dust may have the added charm of being radioactive.
Guinea pigs in an uncontrolled experiment: If you live downwind from us, you might want to pay a little attention to what's happened to Navajos living on a 26,000 square mile reservation that spans the Four Corners region where Utah, Arizona, New Mexico, and Colorado meet. For three generations now, they have been breathing uranium-laden dust from mine tailings and drinking from wells tainted with minute traces of radioactive mining waste. From 1946 into the late 1970s, more than 40 million tons of uranium ore was mined near Navajo communities.
More than a thousand mines were abandoned on the reservation. For every 4 pounds of uranium extracted, 996 pounds of radioactive refuse was left behind in waste pits and piles swept by the wind and leached into local drinking water. In addition to the hundreds, perhaps thousands, of Navajo miners who sickened and died of cancer and respiratory illnesses -- it's hard to say just how many, since nobody in power bothered to keep track -- epidemiological studies reveal a terrible ongoing toll. Navajo children living near the mines and mills suffered five times the rate of bone cancer and 15 times the rate of testicular and ovarian cancers as other Americans. Exposure to uranium has also been linked to kidney damage and birth defects.
Recent research indicates that, in addition to being toxic and radioactive, uranium is also an endocrine disruptor and can have a devastating effect on health -- even when only scant traces are present in the air we breathe or the water we drink. Uranium's ability to bind to and deceive hormone receptors evidently interferes with cellular communication that governs metabolism, cell production, organ development, and gland function. Dr. Stephanie Raymond-Whish, a Navajo scientist, believes, for instance, that uranium exposure is one explanation for sky-high rates of breast cancer on the reservation.
No wonder, then, that the Navajo Nation imposed a ban on uranium mining and milling on Indian lands in 2005. Despite the ban, Hydro Resources Inc. (HRI) is trying to open four major mines near the Navajo communities of Crownpoint and Churchrock. HRI specializes in mining uranium by pumping water and bicarbonate into uranium-bearing strata, then withdrawing the solution and recovering the uranium in it.
Assisted by the New Mexico Environmental Law Center, the Navajo tribal government has been resisting, insisting that it, and not the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, the federal agency that oversees all aspects of the nuclear energy industry, has the authority to keep the company off tribal lands. The tribe fears that the kind of injection-leach mining that HRI plans to do will consume vast quantities of scarce water, while contaminating precious groundwater used for drinking by people and livestock. At just such an operation in Grover, Colorado, groundwater radioactivity was found to be 15 times greater than before mining began.
Nor will mining be limited to Indian lands. As with oil and gas exploration, the likelihood is that nothing will turn out to be off limits. Claims for the right to mine within five miles of Grand Canyon National Park, for example, have jumped from 10 in 2003 to 1,100 today. The Grand Canyon Trust, the Center for Biological Diversity, and the Sierra Club just blocked a mine proposal for nearby Deer Tank Wash because flashfloods could easily carry left-over radioactive materials down into the park. As applications pile up, however, conservationists will be hard pressed to keep ahead of the onslaught of challenges to the Grand Canyon's integrity. So if you want to see this national treasure, fill up this summer on $4-5 a gallon gas and come soon, before a dusty haze envelops the area, dump-truck traffic becomes the norm, and the wildlife flees.
Virtually all of southern Utah's famed national parks and monuments -- Arches, Zion, Bryce, Canyonlands, Capitol Reef, Natural Bridges, and Grand Staircase Escalante -- are surrounded by potential uranium deposits. Unlike the first uranium boom of the atomic era, which took place in sparsely populated and remote canyons and mesas, the new boom is likely to go wherever uranium is found. To take but one example, the Powertech Uranium Corporation is opening a mine just ten miles from the sprawling city of Fort Collins, home of Colorado State University.
Here's the reality of the new West -- like the old West: The boom will suffer no limits because speculators and mining companies enjoy so few restrictions.
Manifest Destiny on a mule: In the nineteenth century, Manifest Destiny sometimes rode in on a sleek stallion, armed with guns and a sword, but sometimes it carried a pick and shovel and arrived on the back of a mule. Mining was encouraged and empowered by laws that provided prospectors and investors with every imaginable incentive. Public lands were seen mainly as storehouses for commodities like timber and metals. No ecological context was considered, because none was available -- other than the rantings of that ol' crank John Muir and the mumblings of defeated Indians.
Today, we know better but, unbelievably enough, the Mining Act of 1872 still rules. That Act is, in fact, the Methuselah of taxpayer boondoggles. It obligates the Department of Agriculture's Forest Service and the Interior Department's Bureau of Land Management to approve applications for exploratory drilling without environmental review. Once ore is found and taken, no payment of royalties is required. The giant mining conglomerate, Phelps Dodge, recently acquired the mineral rights to national forest land in Colorado for just over $100,000. The company expects to extract $9 billion in molybdenum from the land. If, to speculators, the prospect of mega-profits is like sex, the Mining Act of 1872 has always been their Viagra.
To add insult to injury, the Act makes taxpayers responsible for any clean-up of the land after the mining companies are through extracting its mineral wealth. Utah, for instance, has 5,000 abandoned uranium mines that have yet to be cleaned up. They were simply abandoned after the first boom 50 years ago.
A massive uranium tailings pile between Arches National Park and Moab sits right beside the Colorado River, leaking radioactive and toxic debris into water that is eventually used for agriculture and drinking by 30 million people downstream in Arizona, Nevada, and California. Because one enormous flashflood could wash tons of that radioactive milling waste into the river, a $300 million federal clean-up is underway. Taxpayers will pay for 16 million tons of uranium milling waste to be moved away from the river.
Almost half the headwaters of Western rivers are polluted by some kind of mining waste. In Colorado, 37 cities and towns depend on drinking water that exceeds federal levels for uranium and its associated nuclides. It would take an estimated $50 billion to clean up all the abandoned mines and processing sites in the West.
Big, dumb, dangerous cousins: Nuclear power is now offered as an alternative to coal power. But, in actuality, Big Nuke is Big Carbon's mad-scientist cousin. Both externalize their costs: to the land, to the atmosphere, to miners, to consumers, to communities near the mines and refining facilities, and especially to future generations who will live with the long-term consequences of our short-term gains. The damage that both do is, of course, justified as necessary and unavoidable.
In addition to the ecological devastation they cause, their most compelling similarity is that both can get under your skin and make you sick. Westerners who live near uranium mines and mills will tell you that those activities can be as dirty and noxious as coal mines, coal-fired power plants, tar sand pits, and oil refineries. Cancer from inhaling coal dust feels the same as cancer from uranium dust. In the age of carbon and fission, what we refer to as "environmentalism" could just as well be called "embodimentalism," since the decisions we make about what we allow into our air, water, and soil get translated into flesh, blood, bone, nerve, and experience.
Perhaps those iconic cooling towers we picture when we think about a nuclear power plant are like industrial cathedrals, monuments to our hubris and the unsustainable materialism it generates. Our fervent faith in economic growth makes us blind to natural processes, ecological relationships, the long scales of time, and ultimate consequences.
We believe that, because we live above and beyond nature, we can act without context or caution. Our industrial missionaries drive thumper trucks, drill holes, send samples to the labs, and convert investors. Like the conquistadors of old, who searched for gold, they stake their claims on the land for its imagined riches. They declare ownership, no longer for church and king, but for corporation and investors. Ecosystems, communities, and future generations are sacrificed, and still salvation recedes.
Nuclear, coal, gas, or oil: "same old same old," as they say. It's getting hot out here in the West and we need a new story.
After sixteen years on the frontline of campaigns to make polluters accountable, Chip Ward moved into the remote redrock canyons of the Colorado Plateau. There, as a board member of the Southern Utah Wilderness Alliance, he is helping to protect one of America's last great wilderness areas from mineral development and other threats. He is the author of Canaries on the Rim: Living Downwind in the West and Hope's Horizon: Three Visions for Healing the American Land. A movie, "The Public," inspired by his experiences with chronically homeless library users and based on an essay he wrote for Tomdispatch.com, is in production.
Copyright 2008 Chip Ward
Twitter
StumbleUpon
Facebook
Delicious
Digg
Newsvine
Google
Yahoo
Technorati
29 Comments so far
Show AllThanks for this article. Quite an education.
As noted in the movie, A Crude Awakening, about the oil industry and peak oil (I highly recommend it), nuclear power as a replacement for fossil fuels would exhaust the supply of uranium in a couple of decades at most, and the decimation to our planet would be thoroughly ludicrous.
Compare this to the clean sustainability of solar, tidal, wind, and geothermal options, and only one thing becomes clear - there will be a more violent war against those that destroy the land for their personal profit. It is the only way. Love to see those suckers come into the southwest desert. Please do it. Please do it to the Utah government. Corruption may be a fact of life, but it can also backfire. Don't count on people tolerating this. This is far worse than logging old-growth. This affects people's health and the health of their children. Not only will the nuke industry be fighting every green and recreationist in the country, but moms as well.
Besides, they can't even get Yucca mountain signed off. Hanford stews in mystery - they don't even know if it might explode one day, and its seeping into the Columbia. The lawsuits against nuclear power have been incredible and will remain so. And if lawsuits dont do it, personal retribution against corporate invaders will be on the table.
Ownership is not an illusion - exactly. It is a system by which we agree on how things are to be used, or more generally how we shall behave toward things. If I sell my pencil to you, nothing about that pencil changes. The only thing changed is our behaviour with respect to it.
The point being, "ownership" isn't the only, or unnecessarily the best way of dealing with some things.
Yeah I know it ~SAMPSON~, but if you write four billion plus years, some nuker lover will come on here and say it's only 300 to 500 years that nuclear waste has to be stored and that just causes confusion.
It is insane to believe it can be safely stored for 100 years.
sun827 said, "Seems to me we should just change that Mining act from 1872."
Apparently, there has been some action in this regard in recent years. Rep.Nick Rahall, WV has introduced legislation every year to try to make positive changes to this outdated monstrosity. Obviously to no success.
But some articles last year suggested that 2008 might actually see some legislation passed on this issue. I haven't heard anything since late last year but maybe this is something to research, and then follow up on by contacting y/our congressperson to support the legislation which, although not a complete panacea by any means, would put some curbs on the mining companies and require royalty payments of 8%.
OK, as someone who's studied nuclear engineering, the notion that you just use these wastes in a breeder reactor is simplistic nonsense.
Take the wastes that come out of current nuclear reactor. You can broadly break the radioactive substances in the waste into two categories. One is the stuff you can put in a reactor to fuel it. Either unburned fuel from the initital fuel rod, or Uranium that's been converted to Plutonium. You can try to separate that from the other stuff and recycle it back into reactors. Remember that no process like this is ever perfect, and the closer you try to get to perfection the more exponentially expensive it will get. So any separation process is going to leave some Uranium and Plutonium behind.
But, then there's another whole pile of radioactive wastes which are the radioactive remnants of the Uranium that fissioned in the first reactor. Fission is a big Uranium atom splitting apart into smaller pieces. So, what you get is a combination of smaller atoms and radiation. Since the smaller atoms are formed by the violent splitting apart of a bigger atom, they don't tend to be stable elements either. They are radioactive, but they are useless for fueling another reactor. And this is s big chunk of the radioactive waste that comes out of a reactor.
The only good news about those is that most of them have half-lifes that are relatively short, at least when compared to Plutonium and its 10,000 years. So, just putting this junk aside in the bottom of a swimming pool for ten years or so lets some of this decay down to something stable.
But, that's not true for all of them. And you've still got that Uranium and Plutonium that you missed in your separation process left in the waste. So, yes, you gotta find a place to try to safely store it if you create it.
Or at least that's the moral thing to do. To accept responsibility for creating this dangerous poisonous stuff and do what's needed to safely store it. Or, you can just be assholes and dump it somewhere for your kids to deal with later.
"Safely store nuclear by-products for centuries"
First of all, centuries understates the fact. Its technically correct as long as you are think in terms of 100's of them.
Back when I was in school, I studied nuclear engineering. I remember a seminar discussion at a conference that illustrates the magnitude of the problem. It was on the topic of how to makr a site where these nuclear by-products are being 'safely stored".
We are talking 5000 or 10000 years for the worst of these wastes. Which happens to be about the age of the Pyramids in Egypt. So, turn the question around. Suppose the Egyptians were a really backwards race that used poisonous substances for power, and the Pyramids were really a nuclear waste dump. How would they warn us to stay out?
A metal sign on a chain link fence ain't gonna do it. For that matter, you've got to think about not only materials that will last and hold a message for 5000 or 10000 years, but the fact that in the future no one will know how to read your message any better than most of us read ancient Egyptian hyroglyphics today.
And note the way the Pyramids ATTRACTED treasure hunters. As time goes by, the chances of people WANTING to break in because they think there's treasure there, or just to 'explore' goes up if there's not some clear warning that obviously understood that says your dead if you go in here. And even then, would that be regarded as some superstitious old curse?
So, how do you safely-store something when you can't even comprehend how to tell people not to just come dig it up and mess with it?
Ownership is an illusion, the concept of God is also an illusion created by mankind in order to support the illusion of ownership...
Ask the galaxies who they belong to....
And castles built of sand,
return into the sea,
eventually.
enjoy the illusion.... KCT
That's absolutely correct ~PROF~. The pro nukers also ignore the fact, that uranium is a finite source of mineral and there is about a 50 years supply if we keep building more of the deadly nuclear power plants with their man-made deadly waste, which we have to safely store for centuries.
Safely store nuclear by-products for centuries? Ha HA. We have proven we cannot safely store that dealdy poison for even 50 years. The nukers come back and say, "it can be used for fuel in breeder reactors". Bullshit, not all of it can be used for fuel and where are these breeder reactors? None are planned on any up-coming schedules.
Here is a neat link that might make you want to see every nuclear power plant torn down tomorrow. Of course first we should tear down the coal fired jobbers. We need safe and clean energy. ___ NOW!
http://www.kiddofspeed.com/chapter1.html
The nuclear power plant discussion rarely addresses the coolant problem. These plants need huge quantities of water coolant. Locating on tidewater has the dual problems of salt water corrosion and sea level rise while location on rivers has the dual problem of drought and global warming increasing river temperatures.
I suspect that if a nuclear future is chosen that within the decade it will be seen as an extremely bad choice, for these technical reasons alone, that in retrospect should have been obvious.
Capitalism is not Democracy. Democracy is American; capitalism is not. Capitalism funded by the government is Fascism. Fascism is currently American.
lizard,
please forgive me if i missed your irony...
lizard,
You are wrong, the uranium mine tailings blowing in the wind across the west clearly belong to everyone whether we want them or not, along with all the waste and pollution that corporate greed-heads dump into our land and water and air, not to mention the billion-dollar taxpayer bailouts that finance the economic messes they create with their speculative frenzy. Lots of things in corporate-controlled US belong to all of us, whether we want them or not, as long as the corporations can successfully foist them off on us.
By the way, you are fundamentally wrong anyway, in fact the Earth and the water and the air and everything only "belong" in "private" hands in the first place because someone originally successfully stole it. The fact that the corporations continue to greedily absorb everything does not justify itself, and in fact is destroying the basis of life itself. And the only reason you say air is a "possible exception" is because the greed-heads have never successfully figured out how to steal it from everyone and sell it back to only those who can afford it - and as soon as they do figure it out, they will do so, and idiot cheerleaders like you will lead the cheers.
America is like a casino. Almost everyone loses, some make it big, and the owners always win.
America gives you the chance to become extremely wealthy, such as by the mining law of 1872. It isn't supposed to benefit everybody, this country isn't communist. It is a free competition with winners and losers. Those who want to change the law to make these companies pay are generally the losers. The idea that anything belongs to everybody isn't american. The only possible exception is air.
Also,
i look forward to more distractions and blather from nuclear trolls who can't stay away from Common Dreams.
kloro,
Your reply has zero credibility. Just the usual tactic of ignoring everything that an author says, trying to distract readers from everything the author says, by raising one question that is not addressed by the author.
Presumably you mean to imply that if the author demonstrated that he "knew the facts", then he would change his article and write about how needed and important and safe nuclear power is?
Do "the facts" mean the United States is not stealing land and life from the Native Americans who still reside in the west? Do "the facts" mean people are not still dying from uranium mining? Do "the facts" mean corporate spin-meisters are not salivating over the billions of taxpayer dollars they hope to squeeze out of their propaganda machine? Do "the facts" mean uranium is not an endocrine disruptor? Do "the facts" mean uranium mine tailings are not blowing in the wind across the dry west?
Your post might have a shred of credibility if you actually read and responded to any of the points made by the author. But you prefer to attempt a tactical distraction from the ugly ugly facts about uranium mining and nuclear power.
Your post would be more credible if it included evidence that you knew the facts about the powerful and greedy corporate kingpins who have repeatedly proven that they will do ABSOLUTELY ANYTHING and say ABSOLUTELY ANYTHING to expand their control over the land, the economy, and the people of the Earth.
the piece would be more credible if it included evidence that the author knew the facts about nuclear breeder plants.
This reminds me of the movie "Around the world in eighty days".On a bet, the protganist heads east from London in the 1880's to circumnavigate the earth. His last leg of the journey is by a wooden sail/steamship from New York to London.
A few days out of London the wind dies and they run out of fuel for the steam engine. They start to dismantle the wooden superstructure and feed it into the boiler. Eventually they reach London in a bare hull after burning most of the ship.
Kinda serves as a metaphor for the US "energy plan".
Some scientists have said that we are approaching the point of no return in global warming. I say it's too late, we are already past it. This essay and jimostiles June 19th, 2008 1:58 pm's post is all the proof I need. Maybe in a billion years, when the radioactivity has mostly gone away, when the Earth has had a chance to recover from humans, a more wise/intelligent species will be on the planet.
Another great article that at least includes the impacts that the nuclear industry has on Native Americans. If you notice very little is written by the nuclear proponents about the cancer and other life-threatening health effects historic uranium mining on Native Americans, instead they seem to focus on climate change and saving the poor defenseless polar bears from drowning. Sadly this same type of writing holds true for many major environmental groups. But as the nuclear energy propaganda becomes further exposed as a perverted marketing strategy to dominate the American energy policy by foreighers holding philosphies and laws contrary to ours, the environmental groups and other writers such as Chip Ward will begin publishing position and action statements to help the tribes and local citizenry oppose the nuclear industry and protect their own water supplies.
To PowerTech Uranium, you lost! Your Dewey-Burdock lease was salted by historic uranium mining, youll never produce an ounce of uranium there!
NO NUKES
NO COAL
NO KIDDING
THE BLACK HILLS ARE NOT FOR SALE
Growth is also the credo of a cancer cell. It appears the Human Race collectively has about the same intellegence.
Seems to me we should just change that Mining act from 1872.
q: why did all the humans on earth die from hunger, sickness, or from fighting each other?
a: because they were using up and destroying the earth and couldn't stop themselves, and couldn't go anywhere else
what does it take to turn off the power switch?
I am not messianic, not even religious, but I tend to think that all of us engaged in destroying this planet will eventually become extinct as a result of our efforts. Try reading Revelations 11:18 with an open mind: accepting that each of us who puts gas into our car, shops for food or takes a shower, contributes to the destruction of our planet... stop pointing your finger at the corporate fat cats... we are like a virus to this planet and the planet is now getting a temperature....Try buying your way out of that one....!!!!
Enjoy.... KCT
No sweat they've found water on Mars. Of course the atmopshere there is mostly C02.
Kinda like a warning maybe?
If Chip Ward feels as passionately about the proliferation of nuclear power in the United States as he appears to be, I assume that, as a faithful and longstanding board member of the Southern Utah Wilderness Alliance (SUWA), he will urge his organization to disassociate itself from the private equity guru David Bonderman.
Bonderman runs Texas Pacific Group (TPG), which bought the largest utility in Texas in 2007, with the blessing of two of the nation's biggest green groups---NRDC and EDF.
TPG promised it would reduce the number of coal-fired power plants TXU planned to build, from 11 to 3. The claim was not quite accurate since, before the sale, TXU had already planned to cut the number from 11 to 6. Still, it was something to be pleased with. But two months later, Bonderman announced that he would drop plans to build any additional coal plants.
Instead Bonderman's TXU prpoposes to build some of the largest nuclear power plants in America.
So perhaps, Mr Ward will urge SUWA to return the $50,000 donation it received from Bonderman in 2006. And perhaps it will call on its sister organization, the Grand Canyon Trust, to expell Mr. Bonderman from its board of directors. Or return the $389,000 Bonderman gave the Trust a couple years ago. Or the untold thousands more that GCT and SUWA and The Wilderness Society and others received, but are not required to list with the IRS.
And maybe most importantly, Mr Ward will acknowledge that the amenities economy his organization and other mainstream green groups promote as the solution to the economic woes of the rural west, contributes to the need to search for alternative energy sources as dangerous and desperate as nuclear.
I am not a right-wing pro-nuclear, energy-at all-costs individual; instead I believe that the only way to stop this kind of threat is by reducing our consumption (and our population). And not by just going out and buying a Prius, for godsake. We all want a quick fix and there isnt one. When organizations like SUWA become beholden to billionaires like ITS board chairman, what hope is there?
The messianic belief in "growth" is the problem. We can no longer afford growth. Growth warms the atmosphere and will kill us. The insanity of the growth doctrines need to be stopped now. Sustainability and true costs are the measures of the present if we wish to survive. Local Chambers of Commerce are killing machines. Challenge them. It is here that you can make a difference locally. Stand up to them forcefully.
2012 is nearly here. Maybe we'll have all our concerns about government, radiation, and global warming laid to rest then.
Much of western South Dakota was designated a "nuclear sacrifice zone" by an Executive Order from President Nixon.
And the Indian Reservations were initially designated as "POW Camps".
Stop this insanity of uranium mining before it poisons us all.