Subscribe to Common Dreams News Updates
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
Conflicts Fuelled by Climate Change Causing New Refugee Crisis, Warns UN
· Total up 3m to 37.4m as downward trend reverses· Figures exclude those fleeing natural disasters
Climate change is fuelling conflicts around the world and helping to drive the number of people forced out of their homes to new highs, the head of the UN's refugee agency said yesterday. After a few years of improvement, thanks mainly to large-scale resettlement in Afghanistan, the numbers of civilians uprooted by conflict is again rising. During 2007 the total jumped to 37.4 million, an increase of more than 3 million, according to statistics published today.
The figures, described as "unprecedented" by the UN, do not include people escaping natural disasters or poverty - only those fleeing conflict and persecution. But Antonio Guterres, the UN high commissioner for refugees, said that climate change could also uproot people by provoking conflicts over increasingly scarce resources, such as water.
In an interview with the Guardian, Guterres said: "Climate change is today one of the main drivers of forced displacement, both directly through impact on environment - not allowing people to live any more in the areas where they were traditionally living - and as a trigger of extreme poverty and conflict."
Guterres, who has held the post since 2005, said the number of refugees was likely to continue to increase for the foreseeable future. "More and more the international community will be facing an acceleration of people on the move for all kinds of reasons," he said.
As climate change, a global economic slowdown, conflict and persecution fuelled each other, it would be increasingly hard to categorise those on the run.
"What we are witnessing is a trend in the world where more and more people feel threatened by conflict, threatened by their own government, threatened by other political, religious ethnic or social groups, threatened by nature and nature's retaliation against human aggression - climate change is the example of that. And also threatened by ... a slowdown in global growth, plus structural change in energy and food markets," Guterres said.
The Portuguese diplomat is visiting London to launch a week of events marking World Refugee Day on Friday. Today a reproduction of a relief camp in the Darfur region will be erected in Trafalgar Square to raise awareness of the problem.
Guterres said funding from world governments had failed to keep up with the challenge of caring for refugees, describing it as "out of proportion with the dimension of the problem".
The task is also hindered by the legal distinction between refugees, who flee across borders and automatically become the UNHCR's responsibility, and internally displaced persons (IDPs), who flee their homes but remain in their home countries. In 2007 there were estimated to be 26 million of them, and only half receive direct or indirect help from the UNHCR. "They remain under the protection of their own governments, but the governments are sometimes part of the problem rather than solution," Guterres said.
He said the UNHCR was not seeking to widen its 1951 mandate, but wanted a review of the status of IDPs, to ensure they received more international help.
Statistics published today by the UNHCR show that nearly half the world's refugees are Afghan (about 3 million, mostly scattered in Pakistan and Iran), or Iraqi (2 million, largely in Syria and Jordan). The world's largest population of IDPs is in Colombia, where 3 million people have driven from their homes by years of insurgency and counter-insurgency. There are 2.4 million IDPs thought to be in Iraq, a rise of 600,000 over the past year. Almost all refugees end up in camps in their region, rather than in the west, which admits relatively few.
Guterres was critical of Britain's record, particularly on refugees from Iraq. Only 15% of their applications for refugee status have been granted, he said, and the UK's asylum system "still requires people to demonstrate that they are targets of violence and persecution, which is not always easy in situations of widespread violence." But he added: "At the same time it is true that the UK is not deporting people to central and southern Iraq."
© 2008 The Guardian



5 Comments so far
Show AllThe problem isn't "more and more people feel threatened" so much as the threat is that there are more and more people. People keep doing stupid things like they always have, and all people want the better lifestyle of those above them (and why shouldn't they have it?)
We'll starve ourselves and turn the earth into a rotating slag heap in a geological blink - what'll stop us?
We may have to get used to this. CO2 is already too high and accelerating. Sea level is rising, glaciers are disappearing, aquifers being drained. Historic droughts in Australia and Africa. Ocean acidfication, loss of fisheries...
Is global triage in our future?
bbr-001:
The future is now. Triage is us....
We should stop procreating. Instead of governments giving out baby-bonuses, we should pay people who decide not to have kids. Australia, the most draught-stricken country on earth is paying outrageous sums to have children. Why? Also, Australia has decided to solve it's skills shortage by bringing in 100s of thousands of immigrants. Why??
I do understand that everyone wants a car and a house with all the electrical appliances and of course to use them at will - but we should think about our children's future. Increasingly I'm starting to think it will have consequences in our lifetime and I'm already in my 50s.
yep i agree we are still approaching our life as if it were some sort of global "soap opera"...the species survived without modern conviences for.. well literaly... since day one..if "technological progress" comes at such a high price...it should not have been embraced quite so enthusiasticaly as it has..
progress?
we've consumed all this "stuff" (me included) like starving animals at a banquet...
when did we get addicted to "stuff" ...90% of which is entirely unnecesary to survival..mere self indulgence?
even if we factor in all the positive aspects such a medical advances agriculture.. welfare..etc etc..it may well be that the resultant social injustices vastly outweigh the benifits of our progress..those socail injustices would have still been there of course but...would they have been any greater than those being experienced right now and in the future? if nothing else than in terms of the percentage of the global population suffering from those injustices? and for how long?...that would an interesting statistic to factor in..especialy given our higher life expectancy..
can't help thinking that at least some of this progress could have been slowed down to a more rational level if our cultural thinking had perhaps been able to experiment withe the concept of a "maximum wage" as well as a "minimum wage"
as this may have cultivated a more civilised attitude towards wealth and "conspicious consumption"....but that sounds like science fiction doesn't it...then so does most of what is going on today...why should one individual's personal worth be ..without question ..or without even so much as a raised eyebrow..be considered greater than any other individuals worth?
what-ever the view...even a drunk driver might get the car round this "courner" if he slows down sufficiently....but it's hard to see how any-body could get the car round this courner travelling at the speed we're going now...