Subscribe to Common Dreams News Updates
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
In Obama's America, Road to Power No Longer Runs Through Law Firms
There's a massive silver lining to the Obama and McCain campaigns' escalating war to rid each other of staffers and advisors with ties to lobbyists and corporate America: suddenly, slaving away at a big law firm no longer seems like a path to power, but an express off-ramp.
When men as well connected as former Obama VP search committee head Jim Johnson and former McCain advisor (and lobbyist for Burma's military junta) Doug Goodyear can be ousted for their lobbying work on behalf of sketchy companies, it sends a powerful message to current law students (and recent college graduates): the revolving door between the corridors of power and the corridors of greed is rapidly closing.
Now, lawyers will have to choose: spend your career serving your country, or spend it serving your corporation.
This choice will have enormous benefits for the public. Right now, it's common for lawyers (and others) to spend years fattening their bank accounts at big firms and then to soothe their guilty consciences by entering public service with a high powered job in the administration or in Congress.
Unfortunately, you can take the lawyer out of the firm, but you can't take the firm out of the lawyer. Even the most well-intentioned attorneys absorb the culture and values of law firm life: a focus on, above all else, figuring out ways to help corporations maximize their profits while staying within (or at least evading) the law.
After years in this cushy cocoon, most firm lawyers lack the contacts and experience with other interests that government must also represent: the working and middle classes. Of course, many attorneys have quite another goal in mind when they enter government service. They want to pad their resumes with a prestigious office so they can then command a higher salary, maybe even a partnership at a big firm, by peddling the contacts and experience they gained from their years in government.
This type of lawyer runs wild in the Bush administration, with disastrous consequences. People like former Interior Secretary Gale Norton (now of Shell Oil), current Forest Service boss Mark Rey (formerly of the American Forest & Paper Association), and former Chief of Staff Andy Card (now a Union Pacific board member) were less concerned with the public interest than with the interests of their once and future masters in the private sector, who they hoped would reward them once they left office with a job or sweetheart contracts. As a result, they've been willing to let these companies plunder the public's resources and the public's trust.
But in this new era, the Mark Reys of the world are beginning to seem like anachronisms.
Of course, as we shut the revolving door, we have to make sure that those who embrace public service can make a decent living. Because not everyone chooses a career at a law firm out of pure greed. As chronicled in Daniel Brook's brilliant must-read book The Trap, "In the 1980's, people sold out to enjoy a life of luxury; now, they sell out to stay afloat."
As the rich got richer while real wages at the middle and lower end of the spectrum have stagnated or fallen, it can be hard to make ends meet even as a fairly senior government staffer. It's not uncommon for middle class people to pay 50 percent or more of their income on rent or mortgage payments; meanwhile, students loans as well as skyrocketing food and gasoline prices are making the subsidized law firm cafeteria (and the $150,000 plus starting salary) seem worth a little soul-selling.
If we're going to make government servants something more than the current mix of what Brook describes as "moral giants, mental midgets, and trust fund babies," we're going to have to address these more basic cost-of-living issues that cut across the entire society. Not only will that deliver broader prosperity, it will also deliver more honest government.
So lawyers, law students, and aspiring Washington players, I've got a message for you: either get hip to Washington's new power map and get out of the firm -- or get used to being on the outside looking in.


14 Comments so far
Show AllWell, this trend is to the good, though the documentation of his asserted decline in politics as part of the career trajectory of the lawyer is a little lacking; except from impressions derived from a few high-profile cases. On the other hand, don't get too excited about the elimination of legal power from the political arena. Open Secrets data on campaign contributions show over $60 million contributed by "lawyers and lobbyists" to all candidates in this election cycle; exceeded only the "financial and real estate" industry and by "others."
http://www.opensecrets.org/pres08/sectorall.php?cycle=2008 Elsewhere OS shows that Clinton and Obama got most of this money, relatively little went to McCain.
Any changes are more apparent than real. It's all about facades that can enhance candidate marketability -- or at least don't detract from it too much. In the final analysis, however, the money cartels are still the determining factor in U.S. politics, and that's unlikely to change any time in the foreseeable future regardless of concessions for the sake of appearances.
wishful thinking to justify Obama's background and staff picks.
the author of the article is living in lala land.
do you know the difference in the kind of money you can make as a corporate shill, as compared to a public interest lawyer?
Please......
This celebration seems a little premature, especially since Michelle Obama makes over $320,000 per annum as a corporate lawyer.
"Even the most well-intentioned attorneys absorb the culture and values of law firm life: a focus on, above all else, figuring out ways to help corporations maximize their profits while staying within (or at least evading) the law."
If you're a ditch digger, you'd better spend your time at work digging ditches. If you're a corporate lawyer, you'd better spend your time at work doing your job - "figuring out ways to help corporations maximize their profits while staying within (or at least evading) the law." That's what the shareholders pay the board of directors to pay the lawyers to do.
The issue is systemic, and is inherent in our current economic framework. Meaningful change means far more than realigning the spheres of power and influence within our capitalism.
Look for the lawyers of Lockheed Martin to slide into some nice, cushy job if Obama wins. Nothing will change.
"In Obama's America, Road to Power No Longer Runs Through Law Firms" is the title of the article.
That may well be true, but it doesn't mean that the 'road to power' doesn't run through other "channels". There isn't a definitive conclusion in the following article, but what the author says is something to keep in mind and for being very watchful.
This, btw, doesn't include only Obama, but also Hillary Clinton, actually both Clintons, John McCain, and other U.S. govt officials; etcetera.
"Barack O'Bilderberg: Picking the President
by Andrew G. Marshall
Global Research, June 9, 2008″
http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=9270
BEWARE, lest be caught with ... "your pants down", say; to put it lightly.
"Obama's America"? "a new era"? "shut the revolving door"?
Premature is a vast understatement. What is this, some kind of smoke ring piece stoking us to get hyped up on "change" without the substance? An incantation?
wu-wei is right. The problem is systemic and can only be resolved systemically, a truth that folks are now frantically trying to avoid.
Systemically, a good dose of DDT on the head of our government would go a long way to ridding it of the many avaricious lice that prosper there.
One person - one vote.
Remove the "personhood" from corporations.
" Mike Corbeil June 16th, 2008 11:15 pm
"In Obama's America, Road to Power No Longer Runs Through Law Firms" is the title of the article.
That may well be true, but it doesn't mean that the 'road to power' doesn't run through other "channels". ..."
I LAST POSTED, and, well, I don't think so much "That may well be true" as much any longer; even if the following is about more than only all of the law firms registered as lobbyists that have been boosting the Obama campaign.
"Obama's Money Cartel
How Barack Obama Fronted for the Most Vicious Predators on Wall Street",
by Pam Martens, who worked on Wall Street for 21 years, ...,
May 5 2008
http://www.counterpunch.org/martens05052008.html
That's part I, and the following is part II.
"The Obama Bubble Agenda: Bankrolling a Presidential Campaign",
by Pam Martens, May 6 2008,
http://www.counterpunch.org/martens05062008.html
Strongly recommended and recommendable both are. I like her closing in Part II, for she expresses hope that Obama's not part of the whole scheme, scam, and so on; while adding that voters better be of topmost vigilance about him, his doings. I doubt that I could vote for him, and had pretty much had this fully decided, but still appreciate her closing. She doesn't pretend to know things about Obama that neither she, nor most people, know with any certainty.
Feeling like we are certain is not always about really possessing actual certainty; I figure.
Right, and if Obama gets elected watch Edwards get a key role in his administration: Edwards is a poster child of big law firms specializing in personal injury.
Road to Power No Longer Runs Through Law Firms- Right, and the Road to Hell is paved with good intentions.
get rid of represtentative government and create direct democracy in which everyone votes on all matters. That is true empowerment
"Greenberg Traurig ranks ninth among all lobbyists for the same period, with lobbying revenues of $96,708,249. Its partners and employee donations to the Obama campaign of $70,650 by February 1 -- again at that strategic time -- appear not under lobbyist but the classification lawyers/law firms, as do 30 other corporate law firm/lobbyists.
Additionally, looking at Public Citizen's list of bundlers for the Obama campaign (people soliciting donations from others), 27 are employed by law firms registered as federal lobbyists. The total sum raised by bundlers for Obama from these 27 firms till February 1: $2,650,000. (There are also dozens of high powered bundlers from Wall Street working the Armani-suit and red-suspenders cocktail circuits, like Bruce Heyman, managing director at Goldman Sachs; J. Michael Schell, vice chairman of Global Banking at Citigroup; Louis Susman, managing director, Citigroup; Robert Wolf, CEO, UBS Americas. Each raised over $200,000 for the Obama campaign.)
Senator Obama's premise and credibility of not taking money from federal lobbyists hangs on a carefully crafted distinction: he is taking money, lots of it, from owners and employees of firms registered as federal lobbyists but not the actual individual lobbyists."