Get News & Views Updates
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
Moyers vs. Murdoch: Journalism vs. Megalomania
Rupert Murdoch's favorite megalomaniac Bill O'Reilly sent a crew to Minneapolis this weekend to stalk journalists Bill Moyers and Dan Rather. This probably doesn't surprise you. And that's exactly why Moyers and Rather were in Minneapolis. They were speaking at the National Conference for Media Reform, a gathering of 3,500 people aimed at finding ways to get better journalism to the American people.
How dare they! So Fox decided to crash the party; smear as angry radicals thousands of good people who took three days out of their lives to help improve our democracy; and play games with Moyers and Rather -- two actual journalists who understand the crisis in their craft.
That's right. Fox News sent grown men with cameras to lurk behind doorways, hide in alcoves, and crouch in the bushes at night (literally) waiting to surprise two reporters in their seventies with angry questions and a boom mic.You can see this pathetic ambush -- and Moyers classy response -- here on Olbermann. But the attack-dog tactics are already backfiring on Bill O. because they illustrate so clearly what so many of us already know: The corporate media system is broken, and it's hurting our democracy.The O'Reilly ambush is typical cable news entertainment-posing-as-journalism whose purpose is to sell eyeballs to advertisers, not to inform citizens or better society. Add in a good dose of shouting, name-calling, head-shaking, and spurious guilt-by-association invective... and voila! Ratings points.The standard model for cable news has become ridiculous. The facts are selected to fit a hysterical narrative that arguably makes for good TV but bears no resemblance to actual journalism. It breaks every common sense convention of the profession.Rule No. 1 of journalism is that you don't write a story about something you do not understand or witness yourself. None of the three talking heads in Monday night's O'Reilly segment were at the conference they were trashing. The organizers of the event were not called or interviewed. The facts were not checked. They just don't care about that stuff.Is this what journalism has become? Really? This great country deserves better.The conference that Moyers, Rather, Arianna Huffington and others addressed was about the failure of corporate media to inform and reflect our communities and our democracy. It is about consolidated TV, radio and newspapers turning the news into sound bites, trivializing critical issues like elections and war, and failing to hold power accountable.It is a free speech movement at its core, calling for a stronger democracy. We want more channels and more opportunities for voices and views of all kinds.Some of us may be angry about what the media -- including Fox -- say and do, but I would defend Bill O'Reilly's right to speak his mind and entertain his audience however he chooses. I would defend his right just as firmly when he agrees with me as when he uses his show to launch angry attacks on what my community says and believes.
By the same token, every American that believes in the Bill of Rights should demand that O'Reilly respect our right to speak and be angry as well. There is more than a little irony in watching him angrily criticize people for angrily criticizing him. What's good for the goose is apparently treason for the gander.
So what are people so angry with the media about? They are angry about many things they perceive as injustices. But let's take just one -- the war in Iraq. It is now clear that we are fighting a war that was started and waged on false presences. No matter how you feel about the war today, the nature of its origins is hard to dispute. It is a war that was sold to the American people with a coordinated political campaign -- using the mainstream media as its outlet.
This is not the view of a radical fringe of left-wing political activists. This is the premise of an expose written by the White House press secretary whose job it was to execute the propaganda campaign. This is the inescapable conclusion of the New York Times story exposing the Pentagon's years-long secret program to shepherd retired generals with administration talking points to better than 4,500 news interviews.
And this is the self-indicting opinion of Dan Rather, America's most famous anchorman in the Tiffany network's No. 1 chair at the start of the Iraq war. That's actually what Dan Rather said in his speech at the conference: "These [media conglomerates] are entities that, as publicly held and traded corporations, have as their overall, reigning mandate, [the need] to provide a return on shareholder value. ... In the current model of corporate news ownership, the incentive to produce good and valuable news is simply not there. "
He laid down a critique that was directed just as much at himself and CBS as it was at Fox or any other media outlet. Let's also recall that it was the New York Times that has the most famous examples of complicity in botching this story. This is a very serious matter of historic importance by any reasonable standard.
So. Yes, Mr. O'Reilly. You can find people who are angry in America and not afraid to say so. Lots of them -- on the left, right, and center of the political spectrum. Tens of millions of Americans are angry at the costs of war in lives and treasure. Tens of millions more are angry about how the media has handled the global warming debate, tax cuts for the wealthy -- and the list goes on. Calling them "lunatics" and "fascists" and "fringe" would be offensive if it were not too silly to warrant a retort.
It is the perfect embodiment of what is wrong with the media today that one of its most visible talk-show entertainers puts his own self-righteousness above the plain facts in the news. Rather than helping guide and inform the American people in difficult times, Bill O'Reilly has made himself more important than the news. By personalizing everything, he turns the media into a megaphone for his own megalomania instead of helping people understand why their country is in trouble and what we can do about it.
The people in Minneapolis weren't asking to silence Bill O'Reilly. They were -- and are -- asking for something more than Bill O'Reilly. They are asking for journalism -- a craft the founders saw fit to put in the Constitution. That aspiration stands squarely in the best tradition of American freedom.
Josh Silver is the Executive Director of Free Press, a national, nonpartisan organization that he co-founded with Robert McChesney and John Nichols in 2002 to engage citizens in media policy debates and create a more democratic and diverse media system.
Ben Scott contributed to this post.
Copyright © 2008 HuffingtonPost.com, Inc.
Comments
Note: Disqus 2012 is best viewed on an up to date browser. Click here for information. Instructions for how to sign up to comment can be viewed here. Our Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines. Note to Readers: Spam Filter May Capture Legitimate Comments...

65 Comments so far
Show Alljakenewton
You didn't answer the question. When's the last time you saw Noam Chomsky, Gore Vidal or Lewis Lapham on TV? As for the NYT, it's fashionable to be anti-Bush now with his approval rating floundering in the twenties. The NYT was solidly behind Bush in the run-up to the Iraq war and its own Judith Miller was instumental in promulgating the administration's brazen lies. By the way, why do I always imagine you as a nice, Young Republican girl getting paid by the RNC to troll on CD?
Revolution to redistribute wealth...what do you think?
"When's the last time you saw Noam Chomsky, Gore Vidal or Lewis Lapham on TV?"
Irrelevent. How do you know they even want to be on TV?
"it's fashionable to be anti-Bush now with his approval rating floundering in the twenties."
Nonsense, they have been anti Bush since before he was president.
"The NYT was solidly behind Bush in the run-up to the Iraq war"
There was *no one* who knew at that time that the WMD claim was false. No one.
"and its own Judith Miller was instumental in promulgating the administration's brazen lies."
Judith Miller was a *reporter*, not on the OpEd page.
When was the last time they endorsed a Republican for president? What comnist on their staff offers any praise whatsoever for anything Bush does? We certainly *never* heard such a thing from Krugman or Hebert, each of which gets a lot of space on the OpEd page.
"By the way, why do I always imagine you as a nice, Young Republican girl getting paid by the RNC to troll on CD?"
My best guess is that it's a defence mechanism you have in response to having your ideas questioned. As you mature, you will learn to simply respond to the argument before you rather than get distracted with Ad Homs or trying to formulate clever insults. You may even rethink your positions on things when you realize that your beleif is untenable.
Also, if the NYT is so far right, who would you call far left?
Another thing purvis ames, when was the last time the far right NYT endorsed a Republican for president?
This country is finished. Read the book: "Dark Ages America" by Morris Berman. Either that, or read the U.S. Constitution.
mikero22 June 12th, 2008 1:21 pm
"Revolution to redistribute wealth…what do you think?"
Great! As long as it isn't mine!!
What would half a hot dog do for anybody anyway Mike?
I am perplexed. If 90% of media leans to the right of the spectrum why is everyone only calling for Fox News to be shut down? Keith Olberman needs to take His silver spoon out of his mouth and go back to sports reporting. I agree that media outlets are over run back wealthy sources with an agenda. Is this agenda american?
We ALL have a serious problem that if it doesn't get fixed, our children will be in worse shape than we are today. The problem being that our Representatives, Republican and Democrat (Third parties aside) take our money and spend it however they wish. You can bring up the War or whatever else you want but the problem still remains and until WE THE PEOPLE tell or force our Government to abide by basic financial principles that I have to follow in order to maintain whatever lifestyle I choose we will only see the national debt grow exponetially and we will be taxed to death (ALL OF US). Pulling the spending rug out from under Congress is the only way to get our point accross. If spending limits are not IMPOSED, with the exception of national defense (and I am not talking about Iraq), we are headed into a long dark tunnel with no light at the end of it. I am the child of immigrants. I feel that a lot of citizens in this country will not wake up until there is something that literally slaps them in the face. Only I fear by that time it will be to late.
Our Government should not be allowed to spend whatever it wants when it wants. We are their bosses. Concentate on the Congress. The Presidency is nothing. It is a figure head only. The power is in the Legislative body. Take that power back!
Thomas More wants more?
jakenewton
Well, are you a nice, Young Republican girl or not?
Thomas More wants more?
Nope....but I don't want to lose my hot dog! Worked too hard for it.
But I'm perfectly willing to redistribute wealth accumulated paying 15% in taxes while everyome else is paying over 40% total.
Its like under McCains tax plan if I make over $2 million I save 260,000 something. Under Obamas plan, which is just restoring the tax cuts they would pay $720,000 something.
I'd vote for Obama for nothing more than that....if I could be sure he'd do it.
"Well, are you a nice, Young Republican girl or not?"
LOLOL!!!
After I blast numerous holes in your stupid argument that the NYT is right wing, and you subsequent complete failure to even try to address them, falling back instead on your stupid Ad Hom coping mechanism, it seems clear to me that *you* are the young female idealogue. Stupid too, LOL!!!
That the campaign for media reform is drawing so much attention is a good indicator of the slow turn of the tide.
Now, now, Miss newton, don't get your panties get all twisted out of shape. Just one more question. If you could be a vegetable, which one would it be?
Drinkin' tonight purvis?
*plonk*