Subscribe to Common Dreams News Updates
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
Taser Held Responsible in Salinas Death
SAN JOSE, Calif. - A federal jury has held Taser International responsible for the death of a Salinas man in U.S. District Court in San Jose on Friday, and awarded his family more than $6 million in punitive and compensatory damages.
An attorney for the family called the verdict a "landmark decision," and indicated that it was the first time Taser International had been held responsible for a death or injury linked to its product.
But the jury exonerated Salinas police, including four officers, in the death of 40-year-old Robert Heston Jr. on Feb. 20, 2005. Heston died a day after being shocked repeatedly by officers using Tasers. An autopsy found that Heston died from a combination of methamphetamine intoxication, an enlarged heart due to long-term drug abuse, and Taser shocks.
Heston's parents, Betty Lou and Robert Sr., and their daughter sued Taser International. They alleged the company failed to properly warn users that its product could be dangerous, and even lethal, when used repeatedly in conjunction with chest compressions and on people under the influence of drugs.
The family alleged wrongful death, assault and battery, and negligence in their suit against the Salinas Police Department and officers Juan Ruiz, James Godwin, Lek Livingston and Michael Dominici.
The six-person jury found that Arizona-based stun-gun manufacturer Taser International should have more effectively warned police that Taser shocks were potentially dangerous. Salinas police testified during the trial that they were not warned that the shocks could be dangerous.
A possible precedent
Plaintiffs attorney John Burton said the verdict is precedent setting, noting that this was the first time a jury found Tasers are dangerous when used too often.
"We're overjoyed," Burton said.
According to Burton, the verdict included $5.2 million in punitive damages, and $1.021 million in compensatory damages. The jury found that the victim was 85 percent at fault, resulting in an apportioned final damages award.
Co-counsel Peter Williamson said the Heston family was "absolutely overwhelmed and extremely proud that they stood up for their son and brother."
Williamson said he spoke to three jurors, including the jury foreman, after the decision. He said the jury agreed with the "crux of our case," that Taser International should have made more of an effort to warn people about their product once they realized it was potentially dangerous, perhaps even e-mailing all its customers.
"They should have sent out a warning and they didn't," he said.
Burton said he still believes Salinas police should have been held accountable, but understood the jury's rationale.
"Taser continued to say their product was safe," he said.
City Attorney Vanessa Vallarta said in a statement, "We are pleased and relieved by the verdict. This is a sad and tragic case. The jury affirmed that our officers did exactly what they were trained to do in the course of a very violent episode."
Contacted later by phone, Vallarta said the verdict "certainly raises questions" about the use of Tasers and the city would be evaluating their use.
The decision "does put the state of the law somewhat in flux on this," she said. "In light of current scientific evidence, there may be a need for a change in procedures."
No big changes planned
Salinas Police Chief Daniel Ortega said his department wouldn't make any major changes in its Taser use and training procedures, despite the verdict finding that Tasers can be dangerous. Ortega said he was "elated" that his department was exonerated and called his officers "heroes" in the incident. He expressed doubt about the verdict against Taser International and said he expected the company to appeal the decision.
"I have absolutely no intention of not using Tasers," Ortega said. "It's not going to change a whole lot."
Ortega said he would keep trying to purchase Taser cams, which videotape incidents when Tasers are used, and suggested that if the officers had been equipped with the Taser cams the trial never would have occurred.
Salinas police responded to Heston Sr.'s Rodeo Avenue home in 2005 after a friend called 911 to report that Heston Jr. was behaving violently.
In an attempt to subdue agitated Heston Jr., who was later found to have high levels of methamphetamine in his system, officers shocked him repeatedly with Tasers. Some shocks were administered after Heston Jr. was held down by several officers.
When Heston Jr. began turning blue, the officers started CPR and he was raced to Natividad Medical Center. But he never regained consciousness and died the next day.
Burton contended that Heston Jr. was shocked 30 times.
Taser International representatives did not offer comment on the decision.
© 2008 MediaNews Group - Northern California Network



17 Comments so far
Show AllDon't take Paul Simon's Kodachrome away, and don't take the US and Canadian police's favorite device for citizen torture away, either!
What a scary, violent, paranoid country the U.S. is. I heard about a man who tazered a woman jogger then raped her. I didn't hear all of the news clip, but I think he killed her afterward.
The Norwegians I have come across so far don't know what tasers are. I have to explain that they are a kind of weapon that sends electrical shocks into people and the police use them over there in the US. It has been news to everyone I've talked to about it so far. Obviously the police DON'T use tasers here - yet anyway...
WE NEED COUNTER MEASURES...SUITS THAT DEFLECT THE DARTS...OR "GROUND" THE CHARGE..OR EVEN..SEND IT BACK AT EM..OR SOMETHING...C'MON M.I.T GRADS..GIVE THE PEOPLE SOMETHING BACK FOR ALL THE SPY DRONES AND GUIDED MISSILES YOU HAVE BUILT..COUNTER MEASURES..
THE POLICE CHIEF STATING HIS MEN WERE "HEROES" FOR KILLING A PERSON ON A BAD TRIP..IS...WELL..HE SHOULD BE SUED FOR "JOY IN THE ACT OF KILLING A CITIZEN" THAT KIND OF...VINDICTIVE VICIOUS STATEMENT FROM A PERSON ON THE "WINNING" SIDE OF A POLICE MATTER..HAS BECOME TOO PREVALENT IN OUR COUNTRY..SO ARROGANT..SO SAVAGE..SO WITHOUT ANY IDEA OF "JUSTICE"..WHAT WOULD HAPPEN TO A CITIZEN IF HE/SHE WERE TO STATE HOW GLAD THEY WERE THAT A COP WITH A RECORD OF ABUSE, SAY...HAD BEEN KILLED..FINALLY RECEIVING SOME KARMA FOR THEIR FUCKED UP FASCIST ATTITUDE...???..PROBABLY BE PUT ON A LIST AND HARRASSED...OR WORSE..NO FLY LIST..HARRASSED..SPIED ON.
ALSO..PEOPLE..IT IS TIME TO START COMMUNICATING TO YOUR "REPRESENTATIVES" NOW...REGARDING THE ISSUE OF THE COMING ESCALATION IN VIOLENCE AT THE HANDS OF "POLICE", THAT WE ARE GOING TO SEE AS IRAQ VETERANS RETURN AND GET INTO JOBS AS PIGS..ALL THAT BAD ATTITUDE..FOLLOWING YOU..WITH A BADGE..
SEE..THESE ACTION JUNKIES, WITH ACTUAL TRAINING TO DISREGARD ANY..ANY...INDICATION OF CIVIL RIGHTS'..TO SHOOT FIRST AND ..WELL..MAYBE ASK SOME QUESTIONS LATER..THIS IS COMING FOLKS..IT IS HAPPENING NOW...THESE PEOPLE NEED A 'COOLING OFF PERIOD' OF AT LEAST 3 YEARS.. AND EXTRA PSYCHELOGICAL COUNSLEING BEYOND WHAT IS "NORMAL PROCEDURE"..
DO YOU WANT TO BE THE ONE STOPPED AT 3 AM BY ONE OF THESE PSYCHOPATHS FOR SOME.."INFRACTION" AND IT TURNS OUT THEY ARE JUST PISSED OFF ABOUT A "US OUT OF IRAQ" BUMPERSTICKER YOU HAVE ONB YOUR VOLVO? DO YOU WANT TO DEAL WITH THAT?
A GROUP OF PEOPLE WITH THE DEEP SEATED KNOWLEDGE THAT THEY WILL ALMOST SUUREDLY NOT BE HELD ACCOUNTABLE FOR THEIR DEADLY ACTIONS...AND WHO WILL..ABSOLUTLEY WILL..ABUSE WE THE PEOPLE..WITH THE NATURAL "HESITATION" TO KILL FIRMLY ERADICATED IN THEIR MINDS..WITH NO..BARRIER THAT IS..TO GUNNING DOWN A CHILD..OR YOUR WIFE..OR YOU..WITH ALL KINDS OF FUCKED UP PROBLEMS..AND...FINALLY...A ..BADGE????DO I REALLY HAVE T CONVINCE YOU OF THIS?
AND TOO..LAWS NEED TO BE PASSED TO EXCLUDEE ANY LAW ENFORCEMENT JOBS GOING TO ANY ONE WHO HAS SERVED IN A 'PRIVATE ARMY' AKA BLACKWATER MERCENARIES..THERE IS ACTUALLY A RACE ON FROM POLICE DEPTS. TO HIRE THESE THUGS..DUE TO THEIR "TRAINING" WHICH IS AN ADMISSION BY POLICE DEPTS. THAT THEY ARE LOOKING FOR THUGS..PERIOD..AND THIS MUST BE STOPPED BEFORE WE HAVE A POLICE FORCE IN THIS COUNTRY MORE THAN WILLING TO TAKE YOUR GUN, TORTURE YOU, KIDNAP YOU, DEPRIVE YOU OF ANY OF YOUR RIGHTS, LIE, CHEAT, STEAL, RAPE..YEAH..DON'T FORGET RAPE..PRIVATE CONTRACTORS IN IRAQ ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR A RAPE EPIDEMIC IN THAT POOR HELL ON EARTH..SO..PLEASE...GET OFF YOUR ASSES FORE IT'S TOO LATE..WRITE EM NOW..DEMAND CHANGES BEFORE OUR NATIONS POLICE ARE A BLACKWATER SUBSIDIARY...
LIVE FREE OR DIE..
SEE YOU IN THE TRENCHES ...MAYBE..
jcrumb, please don't shout - it's impolite and offensive. Though you may feel strongly about an issue, so do the rest of us. Perhaps you have something important to say. If you address me politely without caps, I will be happy to read it.
I previously posted that I could use a Taser to kill any test subject. No one has disputed my claim or volunteered to be a test subject.
http://abbink.blogspot.com/2008/05/taser-now-linked-to-sudden-cardiac.html
http://www.yourlawyer.com/articles/read/11338
Study raises concerns over Tasers' safety
Feb 13, 2006 | Arizona Republic
The 50,000-volt Taser works by shooting two darts up to 25 feet. The darts are connected to wires that deliver a burst of electricity that is designed to instantly immobilize a suspect. The gun also can be used as a handheld device, without the darts, by touching two metal probes directly against a person's body in what police call a "drive stun."
The shock from a Taser is measured in electric pulses. Tasers typically used by police deliver 15 to 19 pulses a second in a five-second interval, although the gun will continue firing without interruption as long as the trigger is held down.
Tasers operate at 50,000 volts, but Taser says the stun guns do not pose an electrical safety risk because the pulse's current is too low and its duration too short to affect internal organs, including the heart.
Ruggieri's study found that the Taser's pulse was more powerful and longer than the gun's specifications indicate. Ruggieri studied a Taser M-18, which is nearly identical to the Taser M-26 used by police except it has less power.
Taser specifies that the M-18 produces 10 pulses a second at 1.76 watts per pulse. Ruggieri said his tests showed the Taser produced 14 pulses a second at 50 watts per pulse.
Ruggieri said it took him months of research to conduct and complete the tests.
He said he relied on Taser's research and previous stun-gun studies to create a verifiable methodology for testing the Taser.
His findings are based on how electric current penetrates the body.When established electrical standards were applied to the stun gun's electrical discharge, Ruggieri said the current could be fatal. He said measurements of the electric current showed that, according to electric safety standards, the gun had a 50 percent risk of causing ventricular fibrillation.
Taser Vice President Steve Tuttle called the claim "ludicrous" and said it is "clearly refuted by the fact that well over 100,000 human volunteers have been exposed to the Taser discharge without fatality."
Taser maintains that skin tissue blocks electric current and is equivalent to 1,000 ohms of resistance.
But Ruggieri said skin tissue breaks down as electricity is applied, decreasing resistance and increasing the impact of the shocks on the human body.
"This creates a runaway effect of increasing current with decreasing resistance," Ruggieri said.
An independent electrical engineer who reviewed the Journal study at the request of The Arizona Republic said Ruggieri's conclusions were credible and based on scientific principles.
Damn police state is killing people!
age, medical conditions are all unknown to the cop who is using a taser. With this unknown and by the sounds of things risk factor why are they being used. I say turn the voltage down and see if it works. Right now I see on TV the tests and the person is on the ground having a spasm attack. I am sure a well trained cop doesn't need that level of control to control the person.
COWARDS ?
this is the thing that pisses me off the most. The person on some of the TV clips is ALREADY IN HANDCUFFS. They have cooperated and allowed the cops to put on cuffs. Then the cops taser the person and that is attempted murder or criminal assault. Since a taser has killed it is a deadly weapon. It is no different than a cop pulling his gun and shoot the person while in handcuffs.
Don't forget that it's now Blackwater that is training the local police forces.
Any bets that Erik Prince has financial connections with Taser?
When is the country going to wake up and realize it's the cops that are the problem? Tasers have just accelerated or exacerbated the problem. Does anyone remember Rodney King? We probably should be thankfull that we only have to risk death thru Taser instead of cheat death by cops shooting wildly, as in the numerous murders by cop in NYC. How many surreptitious videos does one have to see to realize that the cops by and large see themselves as above and beyond the laws? And the ineffectual justice system exonerates them - every flippin time (jury of peers my butt)! Why do we as a people (or flock) so easily give up our power and rights to jack-booted thugs in uniform? What's this love affair with power and authority? I don't get it...someone please help me understand. My sense is that we're a nation of believers whether it's in the the mythology of America or of Christ or of the capitalism or whatever.. we're just so willing to believe instead of think!
It's about time Taser International was pulled up kicking and screaming on accountability...their lies have cost many people their lives and Taser pads it's bank account! My 19 year old son who was Bipolar is one of the many lives that were lost, he was healthy and strong, unarmed and tasered 21 times while incarcerated in Asotin County jail…the police called it Excited Delirium Death. We call it murder! Everyone who has lost a loved one to the ignorance of the local police and the lies and greed of Taser International should join a Class Action Lawsuit and put them out of business. A mom who will never beable to hold her son again
A mom who will never hold her son again…
Laurette, sorry to hear that, sorry for your loss!
Here is the latest I have seen other than the story found here; the third page of google when I searched "Class Action Lawsuit Taser International"
http://www.cbc.ca/canada/british-columbia/story/2008/05/12/taser-inquiry.html
Stun guns not risk free, inquiry told
Former B.C. attorney general says he was misled into approving Taser program
Last Updated: Tuesday, May 13, 2008 | 1:43 AM ET Comments95Recommend50
CBC News
Monday's testimony comes after a San Francisco cardiologist and electrophysiologist brought forward damning evidence against Tasers at the inquiry, testifying on Friday that the stun guns pose potentially fatal heart risks by inducing cardiac arrhythmia.
Dr. Zian Tseng said any normal, healthy person could die from a Taser jolt if the shock was given in the right area of the chest and during the vulnerable point in the beating of the heart. He said the number of jolts a person receives increases the likelihood he or she will suffer serious health problems.
He stressed the risk of death is far greater if there is adrenaline or illicit drugs coursing through the body, or if the person has a history of heart or other medical issues, and he said that more real-world studies are needed on the use of the weapon, instead of using healthy police officers to test the device.
Tseng said that when he started researching Tasers three years ago and made his findings public, he was contacted by Taser International officials, who asked him to reconsider the statements he was making to the media.
"They even offered to support [my] research, to give me grant funding," Tseng said, adding he declined the offer in order to remain independent.
I strongly suspect this is how Taser keeps most negative news out. Taser International, a blatant fascist organization needs to be shut down, and the police that have replaced thier balls with tasers need to be fired!
I suggest anyone who has lost a loved one to try and contact others who have suffered as such; the names are readily available in most cases; for instance, http://www.ainfos.ca/06/jan/ainfos00174.html
Thank you linkalpha, I agree with you, the sites you suggested were very useful.
It's sad how so many people think - because the people who die from being tasered had to be hardened criminals other wise the "police" wouldn't have tased them. There are always two sides to a story but deaf ears are tuned to the one who was tased. Tasers are new toys to a lot of school yard bully cops that want to try them out on someone...after all Taser Internationl says they can't kill anybody. I'm not saying all cops are bullies I know some really wonderful caring police officers...but it only takes a few mean ones.
Taser International, the main manufacturer of taser stun guns, included in a training bulletin in June 2005 a warning that there were potential health risks in the use of its product. It noted the relation between "excited delirium", taser use and death.
The bulletin stated:
Repeated, prolonged, and/or continuous exposure to the TASER electrical discharge may cause strong muscle contractions that may impair breathing and respiration, particularly when the probes are placed across the chest or diaphragm. Users should avoid prolonged, extended, uninterrupted discharges or extensive multiple discharges whenever practicable in order to minimize the potential for over-exertion of the subject or potential impairment of full ability to breathe over a protracted period of time…[people experiencing excited delirium] are at significant and potentially fatal health risks from further prolonged exertion and/or impaired breathing'.
Read the Canadian Medical Association Journal findings May 1, 2008 http://www.cmaj.ca/cgi/reprint/178/11/1451 download pdf file
With this bulletin T.I. butt is off liability and saddles the local police departments with full liability when someone dies when tasered.
DID YOUR POLICE DEPARTMENT RECEIVE THEIR BULLETIN? Asotin County's didn't or they did not take the time to read it!
Sure… the officers all go through the taser test…but I bet none of them or Taser International Executives would agree to be held down after running a couple of blocks (excited delirium) and be tasered multiple times!!! Is it possible that it would kill someone? So until those field tests can be done the taser should not be used by police officers that have a hard time keeping their fingers off the trigger. The police officers have bought T.I.'s lies hook line and sinker!
Did anybody notice the comment by John F. Butterfield on June 7? He said he knows how to kill anybody by using a Taser.
Believe him! I've studied the deaths that follow Taser use, and I now know TWO DIFFERENT ways to kill a person with a Taser. One will work on ANYBODY, ANYWHERE, ANY TIME. That's probably the one that John Butterfield has in mind.
The other way works only in one very special type of situation, but it kills more quickly than the method that I'm sure Butterfield has in mind.
Obviously, if the Taser can reliably kill people, it is a LETHAL WEAPON!
Why, then, is it being sold as a NONLETHAL weapon? Because it CAN, under certain circumstances, be used as a weapon that merely incapacitates, WITHOUT killing; and because its manufacturer, TASER International, wanted to market it to law enforcement and corrections agencies, and judged--correctly--that it would sell best if it was marketed as a nonlethal weapon incapable of killing people.
Personally, I consider that the Taser is poorly suited for use by law enforcement and corrections personnel, although I consider it an appropriate "nonlethal" weapon for military use. Why do I say this? Because the Taser has a HIGHLY VARIABLE LETHALITY, ranging from extremely low (maybe 0.001 %) to extremely high (maybe 99%).
A highly variable lethality is not a problem for a military weapon that is intended to be an alternative to weapons that kill. Military weapons are used on an ENEMY whom it is always APPROPRIATE to kill!
But consider the challenge that confronts law enforcement officials when they attempt to position a weapon of variable lethality on the "use of force continuum". The very CONCEPT of the "use of force continuum" was developed for weapons whose lethality was assumed to be FIXED!
When a weapon of highly variable lethality is placed somewhere on the "use of force continuum", then there will be times when its placement is INAPPROPRIATE--that is, when its ACTUAL lethality is greatly different from its ASSUMED lethality, based on its position in the "use of force continuum". This is true, NO MATTER WHERE on the "use of force continuum" the Taser is placed. [Remember, each different law enforcement agency using Tasers decides for itself WHERE on the "use of force continuum" it is going to place the Taser. Some place it very low, others near the middle, and some very high.]
Those agencies that place it very low use Tasers frequently. Those agencies that place it very high use Tasers infrequently. Nobody has compared the death rate from Taser use in these two types of law enforcement agencies, although this would be a very useful research project to carry out. It is tempting to predict that the death rate would be higher in the former agencies, compared to the latter agencies, but this may not actually be true, because the latter agencies may be using Tasers primarily under circumstances where a lethal outcome is more likely.
What really will make a different in bringing down the death rate from Taser use is the TRAINING that law enforcement officers receive in their use. I don't think ANY law enforcement officer ANYWHERE IN THE WORLD has received PROPER training in using the Taser as a NONLETHAL weapon!
Mr. Butterfield and I have figured out that the Taser is a lethal weapon. The only reason I have refrained from teaching a course titled "How to Murder a Person with a Taser" is because I don't want to live in a world where the people who have access to Tasers know how to commit murder with them!
Did anybody notice the comment by John F. Butterfield on June 7? He said he knows how to kill anybody by using a Taser.
Believe him! I've studied the deaths that follow Taser use, and I now know TWO DIFFERENT ways to kill a person with a Taser! One will work on ANYBODY, ANYWHERE, ANY TIME. That's probably the one that John Butterfield has in mind.
The other way works only in one very special type of situation, but it kills more quickly than the method that I'm sure Butterfield has in mind.
Obviously, if the Taser can reliably kill people, it is a LETHAL WEAPON!
Why, then, is it being sold as a NONLETHAL weapon? Because it CAN, under certain circumstances, be used as a weapon that merely incapacitates, WITHOUT killing; and because its manufacturer, TASER International, wanted to market it to law enforcement and corrections agencies, and judged--correctly--that it would sell best if it was marketed as a nonlethal weapon incapable of killing people.
Personally, I consider that the Taser is poorly suited for use by law enforcement and corrections personnel, although I consider it an appropriate "nonlethal" weapon for military use. Why do I say this? Because the Taser has a HIGHLY VARIABLE LETHALITY, ranging from extremely low (maybe 0.001 %) to extremely high (maybe 99%).
A highly variable lethality is not a problem for a military weapon that is intended to be an alternative to weapons that kill. Military weapons are used on an ENEMY whom it is always APPROPRIATE to kill!
But consider the challenge that confronts law enforcement officials when they attempt to position a weapon of variable lethality on the "use of force continuum". The very CONCEPT of the "use of force continuum" was developed for weapons whose lethality was assumed to be FIXED!
When a weapon of highly variable lethality is placed somewhere on the "use of force continuum", then there will be times when its placement is INAPPROPRIATE--that is, when its ACTUAL lethality is greatly different from its ASSUMED lethality, based on its position in the "use of force continuum". This is true, NO MATTER WHERE on the "use of force continuum" the Taser is placed. [Remember, each different law enforcement agency using Tasers decides for itself WHERE on the "use of force continuum" it is going to place the Taser. Some place it very low, others near the middle, and some very high.]
Those agencies that place it very low use Tasers frequently. Those agencies that place it very high use Tasers infrequently. Nobody has compared the death rate from Taser use in these two types of law enforcement agencies, although this would be a very useful research project to carry out. It is tempting to predict that the death rate would be higher in the former agencies, compared to the latter agencies, but this may not actually be true, because the latter agencies may be using Tasers primarily under circumstances where a lethal outcome is more likely.
What really will make a different in bringing down the death rate from Taser use is the TRAINING that law enforcement officers receive in their use. I don't think ANY law enforcement officer ANYWHERE IN THE WORLD has received PROPER training in using the Taser as a NONLETHAL weapon!
Mr. Butterfield and I have figured out that the Taser is a lethal weapon. The only reason I have refrained from teaching a course titled "How to Murder a Person with a Taser" is because I don't want to live in a world where the people who have access to Tasers know how to commit murder with them!
Did anybody notice the comment by John F. Butterfield on June 7? He said he knows how to kill anybody by using a Taser.
Believe him! I've studied the deaths that follow Taser use, and I now know TWO DIFFERENT ways to kill a person with a Taser! One will work on ANYBODY, ANYWHERE, ANY TIME. That's probably the one that John Butterfield has in mind.
The other way works only in one very special type of situation, but it kills more quickly than the method that I'm sure Butterfield has in mind.
Obviously, if the Taser can reliably kill people, it is a LETHAL WEAPON!
Why, then, is it being sold as a NONLETHAL weapon? Because it CAN, under certain circumstances, be used as a weapon that merely incapacitates, WITHOUT killing; and because its manufacturer, TASER International, wanted to market it to law enforcement and corrections agencies, and judged--correctly--that it would sell best if it was marketed as a nonlethal weapon incapable of killing people.
Personally, I consider that the Taser is poorly suited for use by law enforcement and corrections personnel, although I consider it an appropriate "nonlethal" weapon for military use. Why do I say this? Because the Taser has a HIGHLY VARIABLE LETHALITY, ranging from extremely low (maybe 0.001 %) to extremely high (maybe 99%).
A highly variable lethality is not a problem for a military weapon that is intended to be an alternative to weapons that kill. Military weapons are used on an ENEMY whom it is always APPROPRIATE to kill!
But law enforcement personnel use their weapons on the public at large. Consider the challenge that confronts law enforcement officials when they attempt to position a weapon of variable lethality on the "use of force continuum". The very CONCEPT of the "use of force continuum" was developed for weapons whose lethality was assumed to be FIXED!
When a weapon of highly variable lethality is placed somewhere on the "use of force continuum", then there will be times when its placement is INAPPROPRIATE--that is, when its ACTUAL lethality is greatly different from its ASSUMED lethality, based on its position in the "use of force continuum". This is true, NO MATTER WHERE on the "use of force continuum" the Taser is placed. [Remember, each different law enforcement agency using Tasers decides for itself WHERE on the "use of force continuum" it is going to place the Taser. Some place it very low, others near the middle, and some very high.]
Those agencies that place it very low use Tasers frequently. Those agencies that place it very high use Tasers infrequently. Nobody has compared the death rate from Taser use in these two types of law enforcement agencies, although this would be a very useful research project to carry out. It is tempting to predict that the death rate would be higher in the former agencies, compared to the latter agencies, but this may not actually be true, because the latter agencies may be using Tasers primarily under circumstances where a lethal outcome is more likely.
What really will make a different in bringing down the death rate from Taser use is the TRAINING that law enforcement officers receive in their use. I don't think ANY law enforcement officer ANYWHERE IN THE WORLD has received PROPER training in using the Taser as a NONLETHAL weapon!
Mr. Butterfield and I have figured out that the Taser is a lethal weapon. The only reason I have refrained from teaching a course titled "How to Murder a Person with a Taser" is because I don't want to live in a world where the people who have access to Tasers know how to commit murder with them!