Subscribe to Common Dreams News Updates
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
Biofuel Land Demand Puts Peasants at Risk: Report
ROME - The rise of biofuels is not only adding to the global food price crisis but also poses a risk for peasants, pushed off their land to make way for energy crops, a report prepared for this week's food summit said.
The use of food such as maize, palm oil and sugar to produce fuel has been blamed in part for record high commodity prices which are driving millions of people into hunger, and will be a key issue discussed by world leaders at the Rome summit.
Condemned as a "crime against humanity" last year by the then U.N. food rapporteur, Jean Ziegler, critics of biofuels say they divert nutrition away from mouths and into fuel tanks and compete for land that should be used to grow food.
Both the United States and the European Union have policies promoting the use of biofuels as alternatives as a way to reduce reliance on crude oil.
The report, published on Monday by the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) that hosts the three-day summit from Tuesday, flagged up several social and environmental risks of biofuels, but said they were not the main cause of the food crisis.
"Recent hikes in world food prices have not been caused primarily by biofuels," it said, listing the main reasons for the price hikes as poor harvests, low stocks and rising demand in Asia for food and fodder.
Co-written by the FAO and the London-based International Institute for Environment and Development and (IIED), the report, "Fuelling exclusion? The biofuels boom and poor people's access to land", said the biofuels boom was a major threat to millions of peasants.
LANDLESS
An estimated 1 percent of the world's arable land is used for biofuels, a figure that will rise to between 2.5 and 3.8 percent by 2030, depending on policy incentives, according to International Energy Agency figures.
Some peasant farmers could benefit from the boom if they have access to land to grow the increasingly profitable cash crops, but other are likely to be driven off land required for large-scale plantations, the report said.
"Specific social groups such as pastoralists, shifting cultivators and women are especially liable to suffer exclusion from land caused by rising land values, while people who are already landless are likely to see the barriers to land access increase further," it said.
Some biofuel crops could be an opportunity for pastoralists living on scrubby land, such as the jatropha shrub, already being cultivated in Mali to fuel power plants, the report said.
But it recommended new standards to ensure land rights of poor people, including certification schemes for biofuels to ensure they are produced without destroying the local environment or abusing the rights of local people.
A group called the Roundtable on Sustainable Palm Oil is creating such a scheme and the EU is looking into whether only certified biofuels should be eligible to be counted towards the 10 percent that will have to be mixed into auto fuels by 2020.
"Biofuels are not necessarily bad news for small-scale farmers and land users," the report concluded, saying peasants could, in the best scenario enjoy "an agricultural renaissance" if their rights are protected.
In any case, biofuels look to be here to stay, it said.
"In the long run, production of biofuels feedstocks can be expected to become a stable rather than a rogue element in land use."
Editing by Christopher Johnson
© 2008 Reuters



15 Comments so far
Show AllIf every bit of food used to make ethanol were instead sent to starving people, there would still be starving people.
If it were mandated that every speck of land available be turned into crops to feed people, there would still be starving people. As has been demonstrated around the world, with more food donated, the population swells so that there is not the same amount of poverty but more poverty.
Check out some food facts and figures from today's BBC news page:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/in_depth/7284196.stm
Today's grain prices don't seem to be significantly higher than the 20-year average, and are very low compared to the 1970's.
With rising fuel prices, though, the market dynamics are changing. I suppose that any change in market dynamics creates winners and losers. On the plus side, more farmers may be able to make a living (most small farmers in the US have day jobs and farm on the side), and more people will be encouraged to grow their own food and/or waste less.
Hi Andrew,
Please read the link I posted before you jump to criticize my rejection of the "food vs. fuel" frame. Don't paint me as having a mouth full of food and a tank full of ethanol when twice as much corn is used for animal feedlots than all direct human food and ethanol combined.
I will accept that there are market realities to be dealt with-- cattle being apparently willing to pay more for corn than Haitians. We have to incentivize the better uses of corn and stop subsidizing the harmful uses.
If we stopped subsidizing the Beef industry, linked BLM land rent to use of distiller's grains in feedlots instead of raw grain, maybe we could move those subsidies to feed poor in other countries instead of making Americans ill.
Don't blame ethanol just because it happens to be the newest use of corn-- look at the harmful old uses of corn as well.
Parallax June 2nd, 2008 2:31 pm
The concept of The DESERTEC on the surface looks REAL good until you look at where most of it it is located The arabs already the recipients of the largest transfer of wealth in the history of mankind because of the oil under their feet now would reap even more wealth by holding Europe hostage to their massive electrical generating capability. As an ex-moslem I've lived in saudi and egypt and can assure you NO arab has the ability to build this on this scale or even a smaller scale, Europe will design it, pay for it's construction, and pay for the electricity while the arabs sit back and pull in all the money. Then when some islamofascists gets POd at the west for some trifling insult (I've noticed in my travels that moslems are so thin skinned that if they were any more sensitive to minor insults (virtually everything from the west is an insult to them) they would be transparent) and blows up the transmission lines it's lights out in Europe.
Did you know if you eliminate oil from their GDP and then add up GDP of the 8 arab oil producing countries their combined GDP would be less than half that of Portugal? These just happen to be the RICHEST nations in the world?
Clark Kent
400 experts in a four year study reported in the 2,500-page International Assessment of Agricultural Science and Technology for Development [IAASTD] report which is backed by the World Bank and most United Nations agencies points out that growing biofuel crops for vehicles threatens to increase worldwide malnutrition.
That among other reports convinces me that the sudden switch to ethonol from corn has caused a major spike in the food crises.
How can there not be a link when major amounts of food are diverted away from people to power vehicles?
The grain used to feed one person for a year in a developing country will produce enough ethanol to fill one tank of a SUV.
There is a serious "food vs fuel" crises.
This "food vs." fuel" frame is wrong and dangerous.
Most corn is currently used to make Americans sick from heart-disease and diabetes (feedlot-fattened beef for hamburgers and High-Fructose Corn syrup for Cokes and Pepsis).
It is actually possible to use corn for BOTH ethanol production and feedlots, because post-fermentation distiller's grain can be used as animal feed and is actually healthier for the animals (thus, fewer antibiotics need to be used).
But, even if that weren't true and we had to chose between feeding the world's poor and making ourselves sick with fat-burgers and soft drinks, we should still choose to give up the disease-causing uses of corn before we give up ethanol.
Ethanol production reduces our dependence on foreign oil and creates a market for the coming cellulosic-ethanol technology that will produce ethanol for virtually any plant material and not compete with food. In fact, we could use corn stalks, husks and cobs for cellulosic ethanol production and keep just the corn kernels for human consumption once the new technology is scaled up to production scale.
The attempt to frame this issue as "food vs. fuel" is a ruse by the oil companies. Don't buy it.
See http://www.opednews.com/articles/life_a_marcus_b_080506_is_feeding_the_hungr.htm
The attempt to frame this issue as "food vs. fuel" is a ruse by the oil companies. Don't buy it.
That makes sense when you consider no one's up in arms about the tobacco industry and its land use.
I see that in this article, they put the bad news first, which everyone reads, and the good news last (last three paragraphs) but not everyone reads that far.
So let's work on protecting the rights of small scale Third World farmers and land users. Work with sustainable ethanol.
http://www.alcoholcanbeagas.com?bid=2&aid=CD8&opt=
(Check this site out, Clark Kent!)
You go, good2go! A big "Right ON!" to alcoholcanbeagas.com! Thanks!
This concept ...
http://www.trec-uk.org.uk/index.htm
needs massive publicity - check out the pictures. With systems like the one proposed in this link biofuels would be stillborn and by 2050 oil would only be used for industrial feedstock instead of a polluting energy source.
Good posts. I totally agree that the anti biofuel sentiment began with the oil companies. How much food is turned into whiskey or wine or chewing gum? Nobody cares about that, but try to turn some food into a fuel substitute, and suddenly EXXon Mobile is very worried about the world's poor. They are probably manipulating the futures markets as well.
Certainly the recently manipulated-to-astronomical prices of oil have a lot to do with high food prices and the oil prices have a lot to do with underproduction in Iraq and uncertainty about war with Iran. I don't say that peak oil isn't real, but the peak oil phenomenon should produce a smooth bell curve of prices over the next 3-5 decades, not a doubling in price in a few months as we've seen.
Anyone who doesn't get that the government's failure to regulate gas prices this year is just another buddy-buddy corpo-gov't deal like Enron writ large... well, they have a *lot* to learn.
Re: Desertec-- looks very interesting and similar to the Barstow Calif. tower I visited in the 80's.
Historically, these solar systems have been more expensive than wind and I'd be surprised if that isn't still the case.
Wind is concentrated solar power, but ocean waves are concentrated wind :-). I predict a mix of technologies will see us through, but that wind will be the big growth area in the near future.
Kent Clark
You say "The attempt to frame this issue as "food vs. fuel" is a ruse by the oil companies. Don't buy it."
Why not ask the millions of starving people in 33 countries that face food riots, though I guess its difficult to imagine starvation with your mouth full of food and a vehicle tank full of ethanol.
For the serious reader go to "How to be food and fuel rich under climate change"
http://www.i-sis.org.uk/HTBFAFRUCC.php
Sounds like those trying to do away with the "food vs fuel" link to starvation and hunger are agricbusiness and seed companies. A bit like the flat earth scientists paid by the oil companies deny the link between carbon emissions and climate change.
Andrew,
I'm saying we should use all the corn we feed to animals now (half the crop!) to produce bioethanol and then feed the distiller's grain byproduct to the animals. It's healthier for the animals.
We should also reduce consumption of feedlot-raised meats and reduce production of high-fructose corn syrup.
Then we'd have twice the bioethanol production we have now, a healthier U.S. population and more food for developing countries than before.
Don't ignore the sacred cow of beef production in your apportioning of blame for corn shortages. Just because we've been stupidly wasting half our corn crop on burgers and cokes/pepsis for a couple of generations now, doesn't mean that's a more worthy use of corn than bioethanol. Besides, if we do it right, we can have it all.
Read the links in this article:
http://www.opednews.com/articles/life_a_marcus_b_080506_is_feeding_the_hungr.htm