The Corporate State and the Subversion of Democracy
Note: Chris Hedges gave this keynote address on Wednesday, May 28 at 7 p.m. in Furman University's Younts Conference Center. The address was part of the protests by faculty and students over the South Carolina college's decision to invite George W. Bush to give the May 31 commencement address.
When it was announced earlier this month that President Bush would deliver the commencement address 222 students and faculty signed and posted on the school's Web site a statement titled "We Object." The statement cites the war in Iraq and the administration's "obstructing progress on reducing greenhouse gases while favoring billions in tax breaks and subsidies to oil companies that are earning record profits."
"We are ashamed of the actions of this administration. The war in Iraq has cost the lives of over 4,000 brave and honorable U.S. military personnel," the statement read. "Because we love this country and the ideals it stands for, we accept our civic responsibility to speak out against these actions that violate American values."
I used to live in a country called America. It was not a perfect country, God knows, especially if you were African-American or Native American or of Japanese descent in World War II or poor or gay or a woman or an immigrant, but it was a country I loved and honored. This country gave me hope that it could be better. It paid its workers wages that were envied around the world. It made sure these workers, thanks to labor unions and champions of the working class in the Democratic Party and the press, had health benefits and pensions. It offered good public education. It honored basic democratic values and held in regard the rule of law, including international law, and respect for human rights. It had social programs from Head Start to welfare to Social Security to take care of the weakest among us, the mentally ill, the elderly and the destitute. It had a system of government that, however flawed, was dedicated to protecting the interests of its citizens. It offered the possibility of democratic change. It had a media that was diverse and endowed with the integrity to give a voice to all segments of society, including those beyond our borders, to impart to us unpleasant truths, to challenge the powerful, to explain ourselves to ourselves. I am not blind to the imperfections of this America, or the failures to always meet these ideals at home and abroad. I spent 20 years of my life in Latin America, Africa, the Middle East and the Balkans as a foreign correspondent reporting in countries where crimes and injustices were committed in our name, whether during the Contra war in Nicaragua or the brutalization of the Palestinians by Israeli occupation forces. But there was much that was good and decent and honorable in our country. And there was hope.The country I live in today uses the same words to describe itself, the same patriotic symbols and iconography, the same national myths, but only the shell remains. America, the country of my birth, the country that formed and shaped me, the country of my father, my father's father, and his father's father, stretching back to the generations of my family that were here for the country's founding, is so diminished as to be nearly unrecognizable. I do not know if this America will return, even as I pray and work and strive for its return. The "consent of the governed" has become an empty phrase. Our textbooks on political science are obsolete. Our state, our nation, has been hijacked by oligarchs, corporations and a narrow, selfish political elite, a small and privileged group which governs on behalf of moneyed interests. We are undergoing, as John Ralston Saul wrote, "a coup d'etat in slow motion." We are being impoverished-legally, economically, spiritually and politically. And unless we soon reverse this tide, unless we wrest the state away from corporate hands, we will be sucked into the dark and turbulent world of globalization where there are only masters and serfs, where the American dream will be no more than that-a dream, where those who work hard for a living can no longer earn a decent wage to sustain themselves or their families, whether in sweat shops in China or the decaying rust belt of Ohio, where democratic dissent is condemned as treason and ruthlessly silenced.
I single out no party. The Democratic Party has been as guilty as the Republicans. It was Bill Clinton who led the Democratic Party to the corporate watering trough. Clinton argued that the party had to ditch labor unions, no longer a source of votes or power, as a political ally. Workers, he insisted, would vote Democratic anyway. They had no choice. It was better, he argued, to take corporate money. By the 1990s, the Democratic Party, under Clinton's leadership, had virtual fundraising parity with the Republicans. Today the Democrats get more. In political terms, it was a success. In moral terms, it was a betrayal.
The North American Free Trade Agreement was sold to the country by the Clinton White House as an opportunity to raise the incomes and prosperity of the citizens of the United States, Canada and Mexico. NAFTA would also, we were told, staunch Mexican immigration into the United States.
"There will be less illegal immigration because more Mexicans will be able to support their children by staying home," President Clinton said in the spring of 1993 as he was lobbying for the bill.
But NAFTA, which took effect in 1994, had the curious effect of reversing every one of Clinton's rosy predictions. Once the Mexican government lifted price supports on corn and beans for Mexican farmers, they had to compete against the huge agribusinesses in the United States. The Mexican farmers were swiftly bankrupted. At least 2 million Mexican farmers have been driven off their land since 1994. And guess where many of them went? This desperate flight of poor Mexicans into the United States is now being exacerbated by large-scale factory closures along the border as manufacturers pack up and leave Mexico for the cut-rate embrace of China's totalitarian capitalism. But we were assured that goods would be cheaper. Workers would be wealthier. Everyone would be happier. I am not sure how these contradictory things were supposed to happen, but in a sound-bite society, reality no longer matters. NAFTA was great if you were a corporation. It was a disaster if you were a worker.
Clinton's welfare reform bill, which was signed on Aug. 22, 1996, obliterated the nation's social safety net. It threw 6 million people, many of them single mothers, off the welfare rolls within three years. It dumped them onto the streets without child care, rent subsidies and continued Medicaid coverage. Families were plunged into crisis, struggling to survive on multiple jobs that paid $6 or $7 an hour, or less than $15,000 a year. But these were the lucky ones. In some states, half of those dropped from the welfare rolls could not find work. Clinton slashed Medicare by $115 billion over a five-year period and cut $25 billion in Medicaid funding. The booming and overcrowded prison system handled the influx of the poor, as well as our abandoned mentally ill. And today we stand in shame with 2.3 million of our citizens behind bars, most for nonviolent drug offenses. More than one in 100 adults in the United States is incarcerated and one in nine black men ages 20 to 34 is behind bars. The United States, with less than 5 per cent of the global population, has almost 25 percent of the world's prisoners.
The growing desperation across the United States is unleashing not simply a recession-we have been in a recession for some time now-but the possibility of a depression unlike anything we have seen since the 1930s. This desperation has provided a pool of broken people willing to work for low wages and without unions or benefits. This is good news if you are a corporation. It is very bad news if you work for a living. For the bottom 90 percent of Americans, annual income has been on a slow, steady decline for three decades. The majority's income peaked at $ 33,000 in 1973. By 2005, according to New York Times reporter David Cay Johnston in his book "Free Lunch," it had fallen to a bit more than $29,000, this despite three decades of economic expansion. And where did that money go? Ask ExxonMobil, the biggest U.S. oil and gas company, which made a $10.9-billion profit in the first quarter of this year, leaving us to pay close to $4 a gallon to fill up our cars. Or better yet, ask Exxon Mobil Corp Chief Executive Rex Tillerson, whose compensation rose nearly 18 percent to $21.7 million in 2007, when the oil company pulled in the largest profit ever for a U.S. company. His take-home pay package included $1.75 million in salary, a $3.36-million bonus, and $16.1 million of stock and option awards, according to a company filing with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. He also received nearly $430,000 of other compensation, including $229,331 for personal security and $41,122 for use of the company aircraft. In addition to his pay package, Tillerson, 56, received more than $7.6 million from exercising options and stock awards during the year. Exxon Mobil earned $40.61 billion in 2007, up 3 percent from the previous year. But Tillerson's 2007 pay was not even the highest mark for the U.S. oil and gas industry. Occidental Petroleum Corp. CEO Ray Irani made $33.6 million and Anadarko Petroleum Corp. chief James Hackett took in $26.7 million over the same period.
For each dollar earned in 2005, the top 10 percent got 48.5 cents. That was the top 10th's greatest share of the income pie, Johnston writes, since 1929, just before the Roaring '20s collapsed in the Great Depression. And within the top 10 percent, those who made more than $100,000, nearly all the gains went to the top 10th of 1 percent, people like Tillerson, or Irani or Hackett, who made at least $1.7 million that year. And until we have real election reform, until we make it possible to run for national office without candidates kissing the rings of Tillersons, Iranis and Hacketts to get hundreds of millions of dollars, this rape of America will continue.
While the Democrats have been very bad, George W. Bush has been even worse. Let's set aside Iraq-the worst foreign policy blunder in American history. George Bush has also done more to dismantle our Constitution, ignore or revoke our statutes and reverse regulations that protected American citizens from corporate abuse than any other president in recent American history. The president, as the Boston Globe reported, has claimed the authority, through "signing statements," to disobey more than 750 laws enacted since he took office, asserting that he has the power to set aside any statute passed by Congress when it conflicts with his interpretation of the Constitution. Among the laws Bush said he can ignore are military rules and regulations, affirmative-action provisions, requirements that Congress be told about immigration services problems, ''whistle-blower" protections for nuclear regulatory officials, and safeguards against political interference in federally funded research. The Constitution is clear in assigning to Congress the power to write the laws and to the president a duty ''to take care that the laws be faithfully executed." George Bush, however, has repeatedly declared that he does not need to ''execute" a law he believes is unconstitutional. The Bush administration has gutted environmental, food and product safety, and workplace safety standards along with their enforcement. And this is why coal mines collapse, the housing bubble has blown up in our face and we are sold lead-contaminated toys imported from China. Bush has done more than any president to hand our government directly over to corporations, which now get 40 percent of federal discretionary spending. Over 800,000 jobs once handled by government employees have been outsourced to corporations, a move that has not only further empowered our shadow corporate government but helped destroy federal workforce unions. Everything from federal prisons, the management of regulatory and scientific reviews, the processing or denial of Freedom of Information requests, interrogating prisoners and running the world's largest mercenary army in Iraq has become corporate. And these corporations, in a perverse arrangement, make their money off of the American citizen. Halliburton in 2003 was given a no-bid and non-compete $7-billion contract to repair Iraq's oil fields, as well as the power to oversee and control Iraq's entire oil production. This has now become $130 billion in contract awards to Halliburton. And flush with taxpayer dollars, what has Haliburton done? It has made sure only 36 of its 143 subsidiaries are incorporated in the United States and 107 subsidiaries (or 75 percent) are incorporated in 30 different countries. Halliburton is able through this arrangement to lower its tax liability on foreign income by establishing a "controlled foreign corporation" and subsidiaries inside low-tax, or no-tax, countries known as a "tax havens." They take our money. They squander it. And our corporate government not only funds them but protects them. Halliburton-and Halliburton is just one example-is the engine of our new, rogue corporate state, serviced by people like George Bush and Dick Cheney, once the company's CEO.
The disparity between our oligarchy and the working class has created a new global serfdom. Credit Suisse analysts estimates that the number of subprime foreclosures in the United States over the next two years will total 1,390,000 and that by the end of 2012, 12.7 percent of all residential borrowers in the United States will be forced out of their homes. The corporate state, which as an idea is an abstraction to many Americans, is very real when the pieces are carefully put together and linked to a system of corporate power that has made this poverty, the denial of our constitutional rights and a state of permanent war inevitable. The assault on the American working class-an assault that has devastated members of my own family- is nearly complete. The U.S. economy has 3.2 million fewer jobs today than it did when George Bush took office, including 2.5 million fewer manufacturing jobs. In the past three years, nearly one in five U.S. workers was laid off. Among workers laid off from full-time work, roughly one-fourth were earning less than $40,000 annually. A total of 15 million U.S. workers are unemployed, underemployed or too discouraged to job hunt, according to the Labor Department. There are whole sections of the United States which now resemble the developing world. There has been a Weimarization of the American working class. And the assault on the middle class is now under way. Anything that can be put on software-from finance to architecture to engineering-can and is being outsourced to workers in countries such as India or China who accept a fraction of the pay and work without benefits. And both the Republican and Democratic parties, beholden to corporations for money and power, allow this to happen.
Take a look at our government departments. Who runs the Defense Department? The Department of Interior? The Department of Agriculture? The Food and Drug Administration? Who runs the Department of Labor? Corporations. And in an election year where we are numbed by absurdities we hear nothing about this subordinating of the American people to corporate power. The political debates, which have become popularity contests, are ridiculous and empty. They do not confront the real and advanced destruction of our democracy. They do not confront the takeover of our electoral processes.
We have watched over the past few decades the rise of a powerful web of interlocking corporate entities, a network of arrangements within subsectors, industries or other partial jurisdictions to diminish and often abolish outside control and oversight. These corporations have neutralized national, state and judicial authority. They dominate, for example, a bloated and wasteful defense industry which has become sacrosanct and beyond the reach of politicians, most of whom are left defending military projects in their districts, no matter how redundant, because they provide jobs. This has permitted a military-industrial complex, which contributes lavishly to political campaigns, to spread across the country with virtual impunity. Defense-related spending for fiscal 2008 will exceed $1 trillion for the first time in history. The U.S. has become the largest single seller of arms and munitions on the planet. The defense budget for fiscal 2008 is the largest since the Second World War even as we have more than $400 billion in annual deficits. More than half of federal discretionary spending goes to defense. This will not end when Bush leaves office. And so we build Cold War relics like $ 3.4-billion submarines and stealth fighters to evade radar systems the Soviets never built and spend $ 8.9 billion on ICBM missile defense that will be useless in stopping a shipping container concealing a dirty bomb. The defense industry is able to monopolize the best scientific and research talent and squander the nation's resources and investment capital. These defense industries produce nothing that is useful for society or the national trade account. Melman, like President Eisenhower, saw the defense industry as viral, something that, as it grew, destroyed a healthy economy. And so we produce sophisticated fighter jets while Boeing is unable to finish its new commercial plane on schedule, and our automotive industry tanks. We sink money into research and development of weapons systems and starve technologies to fight against global warming and renewable energy. Universities are awash in defense-related cash and grants, and struggle to find money for environmental studies. This massive military spending, aided by this $3-trillion war, is hollowing us out from the inside. Our bridges and levees collapse, our schools decay and our safety net is taken away.
The corporate state, begun under Ronald Reagan and pushed forward by every president since, has destroyed the public and private institutions that protected workers and safeguarded citizens. Only 7.8 per cent of workers in the private sector are unionized. This is about the same percentage as in the early 1900s. There are 50 million Americans in real poverty and tens of millions of Americans in a category called "near poverty." Our health care system is broken. Eighteen thousand people die in this country, according to the Institute of Medicine, every year because they can't afford health care. That is six times the number of people who died in the 9/11 attacks, and these unnecessary deaths continue year after year. But we do not hear these stories of pain and dislocation. We are diverted by bread and circus. News reports do little more than report on trivia and celebrity gossip. The FCC, in an example of how far our standards have fallen, defines shows like Fox's celebrity gossip program "TMZ" and the Christian Broadcast Network's "700 Club" as "bona fide newscasts." The economist Charlotte Twight calls this vast corporate system of spectacle and democratic collapse "participatory fascism."
How did we get here? How did this happen? In a word, deregulation-the systematic dismantling of the managed capitalism that was the hallmark of the American democratic state. Our political decline came about because of deregulation, the repeal of antitrust laws, and the radical transformation from a manufacturing economy to a capital economy. This understanding led Franklin Delano Roosevelt on April 29, 1938, to send a message to Congress titled "Recommendations to the Congress to Curb Monopolies and the Concentration of Economic Power." In it, he wrote:
"The first truth is that the liberty of democracy is not safe if the people tolerate the growth of power to a point where it becomes stronger than the democratic state itself. That, in its essence, is Fascism-ownership of Government by an individual, by a group, or by any other controlling private power. The second truth is that the liberty of a democracy is not safe if its business system does not provide employment and produce and distribute goods in such a way to sustain an acceptable standard of living."
The rise of the corporate state has grave political consequences, as we saw in Italy and Germany in the early part of the 20th century. Antitrust laws not only regulate and control the marketplace, they serve as bulwarks to protect democracy. And now that they are gone, now that we have a state that is run by and on behalf of corporations, we must expect inevitable and perhaps terrifying political consequences.
I spent two years traveling the country to write a book on the Christian right called "American Fascists: The Christian Right and the War on America." In depressed former manufacturing towns from Ohio to Kentucky it was the same. There are tens of millions of Americans for whom the end of the world is no longer an abstraction. They have lost hope. Fear and instability has plunged the working class into personal and economic despair, and not surprisingly into the arms of the demagogues and charlatans of the radical Christian right who offer a belief in magic, miracles and the fiction of a utopian Christian nation. And unless we re-enfranchise these Americans back into the economy, unless we give them hope, our democracy is doomed.
As the pressure mounts, as this despair and desperation reaches into larger and larger segments of the American populace, the mechanisms of corporate and government control are being bolstered to prevent civil unrest and instability. It is not accidental that with the rise of the corporate state comes the rise of the security state. This is why the Bush White House has pushed through the Patriot Act (and its renewal), the suspension of habeas corpus, the practice of "extraordinary rendition," the warrantless wiretapping on American citizens and the refusal to ensure free and fair elections with verifiable ballot-counting. It is part of a package. It comes together. It is not about terrorism or national security. It is about control. It is about their control of us.
Sen. Frank Church, as chairman of the Select Committee on Intelligence in 1975, investigated the government's massive and highly secretive National Security Agency. He wrote:
"That capability at any time could be turned around on the American people and no American would have any privacy left, such is the capability to monitor everything: telephone conversations, telegrams, it doesn't matter. There would be no place to hide. If this government ever became a tyranny, if a dictator ever took charge in this country, the technological capacity that the intelligence community has given the government could enable it to impose total tyranny, and there would be no way to fight back, because the most careful effort to combine together in resistance to the government, no matter how privately it was done, is within the reach of the government to know. Such is the capability of this technology. ... I don't want to see this country ever go across the bridge. I know the capability that is there to make tyranny total in America, and we must see to it that this agency and all agencies that possess this technology operate within the law and under proper supervision, so that we never cross over that abyss. That is the abyss from which there is no return. ..."
When Sen. Church made this statement the NSA was not authorized to spy on American citizens. Today it is.
In a military brig in Charleston an American citizen, Ali Saleh Kahlah al-Marri, is being held in a black hole set up on American soil. He was stripped on June 23, 2003, by George Bush of his constitutional rights and declared an "enemy combatant." He is being detained without charge, interrogated without a lawyer and held indefinitely. Lawyers for the Bush administration claim that the president can send the military into any neighborhood, any town or suburb, capture a citizen and hold him or her in prison without charge. They base this claim on the Authorization for Use of Military Force, passed by Congress after 9/11, that gives President Bush the power to "use all necessary and appropriate force" against anyone involved in planning, aiding or carrying out the attacks. But Al-Mari was not captured in Afghanistan or Iraq. He was arrested in Peoria, Ill., in December 2001. And if the president can declare American citizens living inside the United States to be enemy combatants and order them stripped of constitutional rights, what does this mean for us? How long can we be held without charge? Without lawyers? Without access to the outside world? Maybe Al-Mari is, as the government claims, a terrorist. I don't know. But I do know that if this becomes a precedent, if it is not overturned by the courts, habeas corpus, the most important bulwark of our democratic state, will be dead.
We are fed lie after lie to mask the destruction the corporate state has wrought in our lives. The consumer price index, for example, used by the government to measure inflation, has become meaningless. To keep the official inflation figures low the government has been substituting basic products they once measured to check for inflation with ones that do not rise very much in price. This trick has kept the cost-of-living increases tied to the CPI artificially low. The disconnect between what we are told and what is actually true is worthy of the old East German state. The New York Times' consumer reporter, W.P. Dunleavy, wrote that her groceries now cost $587 a month, up from $400 a year earlier. This is a 40 percent increase. California economist John Williams, who runs an organization called Shadow Statistics, contends that if Washington still used the CPI measurements applied back in the 1970s, inflation would be in the 10 percent range. The advantage to the corporations is huge. A false inflation rate, one far lower than the real rate, keeps equitable interest payments on bank accounts and certificates of deposit down. It masks the deterioration of the American economy. The Potemkin statistics allow corporations and the corporate state to walk away from obligations tied to real adjustments for inflation. These statistics mean that less is paid out in Social Security and pensions. It has reduced the interest on the multitrillion-dollar debt. Corporations never have to pay real cost-of-living increases to their employees. The term "unemployment" has also been steadily redefined. This has rendered official data on employment worthless. In real terms about 10 percent of the working population is unemployed, a figure that is, over the long run, unsustainable. The economy, despite the official statistics, is not growing. It is shrinking. And as the nation crumbles we are awash with the terrible simplicity of false statistics. We confuse our emotional responses, carefully manipulated by advertisers, pundits, spin doctors, television hosts, political consultants and focus groups, with knowledge. It is how we elect presidents and those we send to Congress, how we make decisions, even decisions to go to war. It is how we view the world. Four media giants-AOL-Time Warner, Viacom, Disney, and Rupert Murdoch's NewsGroup-control nearly everything we read, see and hear. This growing disconnect with reality is the hallmark of a totalitarian state.
"Before they seize power and establish a world according to their doctrines," Hannah Arendt wrote, "totalitarian movements conjure up a lying world of consistency which is more adequate to the needs of the human mind than reality itself; in which, through sheer imagination, uprooted masses can feel at home and are spared the never-ending shocks which real life and real experiences deal to human beings and their expectations. The force possessed by totalitarian propaganda-before the movements have the power to drop iron curtains to prevent anyone's disturbing, by the slightest reality, the gruesome quiet of an entirely imaginary world-lies in its ability to shut the masses off from the real world."
So what do we do? Voting is not enough. If voting was that effective, to quote the activist Philip Berrigan, it would be illegal. And voting in an age when elections are stolen by rigged ballot machines and a stacked Supreme Court willing to overturn all legal precedent to make George Bush president, will not work. I am not saying do not vote. We should all vote. But that has to be the starting point if we want to reclaim America. We must lobby, organize and advocate for the dissolution of the World Trade Organization and NAFTA. The WTO and NAFTA have handcuffed workers, consumers and stymied our efforts to create clean environments. These agreements are beyond the control of our courts and have crippled our weakened regulatory agencies. The WTO forces our working class to compete with brutalized child and prison labor overseas, to be reduced to this level of slave labor or to go without meaningful work. We need to repeal the anti-worker Taft-Hartley law of 1947. The act obstructs the organization of unions. We need to transfer control of pension funds from management to workers. If these pension funds, worth trillions of dollars, were in the hands of workers the working class would own a third of the New York Stock Exchange.
The working class has every right to be, to steal a line from Obama, bitter with liberal elites. I am bitter. I have seen what the loss of manufacturing jobs and the death of the labor movement did to my relatives in the former mill towns in Maine. Their story is the story of tens of millions of Americans who can no longer find a job that supports a family and provides basic benefits. Human beings are not commodities. They are not goods. They grieve, and suffer and feel despair. They raise children and struggle to maintain communities. The growing class divide is not understood, despite the glibness of many in the media, by complicated sets of statistics or the absurd, utopian faith in unregulated globalization and complicated trade deals. It is understood in the eyes of a man or woman who is no longer making enough money to live with dignity and hope.
George Bush, who will be here on Saturday, has done more to shred, violate or absent the government from its obligations under domestic and international law. He has refused to sign the Kyoto Protocol, backed out of the Anti-Ballistic Missile Treaty, tried to kill the International Criminal Court, walked out on negotiations on chemical and biological weapons, and defied the Geneva Convention and human rights law. He has set up offshore penal colonies where we deny detainees basic rights and openly engage in torture. He launched an illegal war in Iraq based on fabricated evidence we now know had been discredited even before it was made public. And if we as citizens do not hold him accountable for these crimes, if we allow the Democratic majority in Congress to get away with its refusal to begin the process of impeachment, which appears likely, we will be complicit in the codification of a new world order, one that will have terrifying consequences. For a world without treaties, statutes and laws is a world where any nation, from a rogue nuclear state to a great imperial power, will be able to invoke its domestic laws to annul its obligations to others. This new order will undo five decades of international cooperation-largely put in place by the United States-destroy our own constitutional rights and thrust us into a Hobbesian nightmare. We are one, maybe two, terrorist attacks away from a police state. Time is running out.
We must not allow international laws and treaties-ones that set minimum standards of behavior and provide a framework for competing social, political, economic and religious groups and interests to resolve differences-to be discarded. The exercise of power without law is tyranny. And the consequences of George Bush's violation of the law, his creation of legal black holes that can swallow American citizens along with those outside our borders, run in a direct line from the White House to Abu Ghraib, Guantanamo and military brigs in cities such as Charleston.
George Bush-we now know from the leaked Downing Street memo-fabricated a legal pretext for war. He decided to charge Saddam Hussein with the material breach of the resolution passed in the wake of the 1991 Gulf War. He had no evidence that Saddam Hussein was in breach of this resolution. And so he and his advisers manufactured reports of weapons of mass destruction and disseminated them to a frightened and manipulated press and public. In short, he lied. He lied to us and to the rest of the world. There are tens of thousands, perhaps a few hundred thousand people, who have been killed and maimed in a war that has no legal justification, a war waged in violation of international law, a war that under the post-Nuremberg laws is defined as "a criminal war of aggression."
We have blundered into nations we know little about. We are caught between bitter rivalries and competing ethnic groups and leaders we do not understand. We are trying to transplant a modern system of politics invented in Europe characterized, among other things, by the division of earth into independent secular states based on national citizenship in a land where the belief in a secular civil government is an alien creed. Iraq was a cesspool for the British when they occupied it in 1917. It will be a cesspool for us as well. We can either begin an orderly withdrawal or watch the mission collapse.
A rule-based world matters. The creation of international bodies and laws, the sanctity of our constitutional rights, have allowed us to stand pre-eminent as a nation-one that seeks at its best to respect and defend the rule of law. If we demolish the fragile and delicate domestic and international order, if we permit George Bush to create a world where diplomacy, broad cooperation, democracy and law are worthless, if we allow these international and domestic legal safeguards to unravel, our moral and political authority will plummet. We will erode the possibility of cooperation between nation-states, including our closest allies. We will lose our country. And we will, in the end, see visited upon us the evils we visit on others. Read Antigone, when the king imposes his will without listening to those he rules or Thucydides' history. Read how Athens' expanding empire saw it become a tyrant abroad and then a tyrant at home. How the tyranny the Athenian leadership imposed on others it finally imposed on itself. This, Thucydides wrote, is what doomed Athenian democracy; Athens destroyed itself. For the primary instrument of tyranny and empire is war and war is a poison, a poison which at times we must ingest just as a cancer patient must ingest a poison to survive. But if we do not understand the poison of war-if we do not understand how deadly that poison is-it can kill us just as surely as the disease.
Hope, St. Augustine wrote, has two beautiful daughters. They are anger and courage. Anger at the way things are and the courage to see they do not remain the way they are. We stand at the verge of a massive economic dislocation, one forcing millions of families from their homes and into severe financial distress, one that threatens to rend the fabric of our society. We are waging a war that devours lives and capital, and that cannot ultimately be won. We are told we need to give up our rights to be safe, to be protected. In short, we are made afraid. We are told to hand over all that is best about our nation to those like George Bush and Dick Cheney who seek to destroy our nation. A state of fear only engenders cruelty; cruelty, fear, insanity, and then paralysis. In the center of Dante's circle the damned remained motionless. If we do not become angry, if we do not muster within us the courage, indeed the militancy, to challenge those in the Democratic and Republican parties who herd us towards the corporate state, we will have squandered our courage and our integrity when we need it most.
Chris Hedges, who graduated from Harvard Divinity School and was for nearly two decades a foreign correspondent for The New York Times, is the author of "American Fascists: The Christian Right and the War on America."
©2008 TruthDig.com
Delicious
Digg
StumbleUpon
Newsvine
Facebook
Google
Yahoo
Technorati
104 Comments so far
Show AllIke Kay: You say that Nader was partially responsible for Bush's election in 2000. You're kidding me, right? I thought people with the ability to read had moved on from that propaganda ages ago! You must have missed the memo. The new Demoncrat/corporate media line on Nader is that he's "irrelevant" or the "his message doesn't resonate" (not the "spoiler" nonsense). Maybe your subscription to the "Howard Dean Faux Progressive Quarterly" was up and you didn't get to read that January 2005 issue. ;-)
Just to restate it all one more time so that you can see how truly ridiculous the thought process (or lack, thereof) really is ...
1) Al Gore won in Florida (and in the U.S.) in 2000. He was asked by numerous black members of Congress to fight for the 57,000 black Floridians that the Bushes illegally disenfranchised. Gore refused. He also did not win his home state or Clinton's home state. He is and was a LOSER who didn't fight for the truth. Truthfully, he's just a ruling class tobacco stooge who only cares about the corporate money he now makes hawking his movie and hybrids (instead of lower energy consumption and sustainable energy).
2) Those who say Nader "cost Gore the election" are saying that over 537 votes! All of the candidates on the Florida ballot exceeded that number (some by far more than Nader). Why was ONLY Nader singled out by the media and the fake opposition party for vilification? Can you even name any of the other SIX independent/third party candidates who were also on that ballot? Why did the Demoncrats only attack Ralph? Is it because of his 40 year long, rock solid, progressive resume OR is it because they will simply believe whatever crap they're fed by the media and their faux progressive party?
3) Almost 8 million Demoncrats voted for Bush in 2000. Their national vote total exceeded Nader's national vote total by almost 3 times!! Why aren't THEY the spoilers? Maybe Dems should clean up their own 'progressive house' before telling true independents how to run ours! We despise your crummy house. We wouldn't ever set foot in it and you are not welcome in it.
I am constantly amazed at the number of people who simply accept that Ralph is the 2000 scapegoat without any evidence whatsoever. These people are obviously mathematically challenged but its painful to see how many seem to be severely lacking in the spine department, as well.
Its truly sad that 25 years from now my children and I will all be forced to share bunks in the same prison camps with all of these fake progressives who just don't see that being a covert fascist (read: Demoncrat) is no better than being an overt fascist (read: Rethuglican). Grow a spine! At the very least, please stop vilifying a guy that the fake media and your fake party of change don't want you to hear. The fact that they wish to silence him should clue you in to just how dangerous they know him to be.
As for (pro-war, anti-single payer) Obama being some kind of "candidate of change", I'll reserve judgement on that until I hear him insist repeatedly that Ralph (and Bob Barr and Cynthia McKinney and anyone else polling 3% or better) be included in ALL televised presidential debates. Until that happens, I'm smart enough to know a sales pitch when I hear one. Are you?
Gail, you say,
"If you can't convince the majority not to vote for corporate stooges in the primaries, what makes you think they are going to change their minds in November? Are you kidding?"
No, I'm definitely not kidding. You speak of a 'majority' voting in the primaries. What majority is that? A small minority of our population decides which stooges will run for them, NOT a majority. This time around (with record turnout, too) fewer than 20% of the American people voted in the select-a-stooge primaries. About 36 million Demoncrats and fewer than 5 million Rethuglicans voted in the primaries. Waht math allows you to see 20% as a majority?
Also, you say, "Meanwhile, we have two or three Supreme Court Justices getting ready for retirement. What we don't need is a Supreme Court filled with Alitos and Scalias! To prevent that, I am more than willing to "throw-away" my vote."
Antonin Scalia was approved by a Senate vote of 98-0! How did the fake party of opposition stand up to the biggest Nazi to be appointed yet? Not at all. They rolled right over and put him in unanimously (quite reminiscent of their support for global economic slavery, Persian Gulf War I, the Invasion of Afghanistan, the illegal bombing and occupation of Iraq, the Patriot Act and a thousand other evils they are complicit in). Way to go 'opposition party'!
The old "go along to get along" faux academic argument just doesn't fly with me. The basic problem with voting for the 'lesser evil' is that you really are not accomplishing a single thing! If fear of a bad Supreme Court justice pick is what really excite your paranoia, you need to understand that the Supreme Court isn't about fake right versus fake left ... its about corporate interests versus the American citizenry. Check out Jeffrey Rosen's great piece from the NY Times magazine (Supreme Court Inc.). It might help you to see that the real danger with Supreme Court appointments is that they are being made by the US Chamber of Commerce with both parties playing along for the past thirty years!
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/03/16/magazine/16supreme-t.html?_r=1&oref=slogin
Gail, I'm saying vote for Ralph Nader because, literally, nothing else makes sense!
Yes, the recent speech written by Chris Hedges as Furnam University, printed in Truth Dig, says it so well for all of us who fighting the cooperate monster and what it has created - a planet that is a "World On Edge" my documentary one that covets acquisitiveness and consumer ideology as a reason for existence, as an end in itself.
Humanity is in peril because the USA elected George Bush as president with the complicity of the media which shows the lowest level of this corporate mentality that is so an affront to humanity, a measure of the levels of intelligence of Americans, even though it was an illegal fifty-percent that elected him to office. Bush's election to office showed the flaws of this so-called democracy, and the level that the corporate empire will sink to be able to operate with impunity in the world, to rape the very survival l of humanity for their greed driven existence. This was notably seen at the Exxon hearings before the senate and the shareholders meeting at Exxon where the lowest level of corporate responsibility was fought so hard as to show that it even sickens the stomachs of the very wealthy.
All of this to continue a global economy, known as globalization with ideas of value promulgated by a country that is two hundred and fifty years old, led by an old shock jock, born again drunkard, with little regard for intellectual thought, or the very values that spiritual thought should imbue. Welcome to America!
In the present Congress and in the blogs most people avoid reality and don't really deal with the issues head on. Most are still looking for the magic technological bullet that will save the American economy so the USA can continue on the way it's going with ever more growth and ever more and greater GDP as the bankers, advise. Even some scientists think we can continue this way of life unchanged if we just, ease a little bit on energy consumption and wait until we figure it out.
There are some who say it does not matter who one votes for in this political system, yes squander your vote on in another close election with a vote for Nader, we all know how perfect this man is and that he will be able to get things done! If Nader were elected he would not be able to enact any meaningful legislation. Not a single bill would become law because he would not have a congress that would give him the right time. It would be a fair day in hell to get anything done. With the leadership of Nancy Pelosi's it would be worse. Moreover, however bad Obama may be, there are no illusions that he is and must be, in the hands of the Democratic machine, but at least the platform will offer some relief for the masses and there is some hope, even now felt by the world, for the future and the environment.
Should Obama lose you have eight more years of the Bush/Cheney nightmare, that is just the facts so lets stop the idealistic nonsense offered up on the star-struck silver screen and your media driven nonsense and get real, this is the USA. There are too many important issues that require change to take chances. But some of you here have so much grand illusion that you feel that these past seven years, thanks to Nader in part, and Gore's ineptitude, were worth the experiment?
Nader is not the answer in a failed political system backed by corporate mentality that fifty percent of Americans have bought into. The congress is where the laws of greed are enacted, such as it is, it's the system that must be changed and whether or not one likes or agrees with Obama, he has been chosen by the Demorepubs to try to change the system.
Americans can be and are a much better people than their leaders have shown the world. For the first time Obama is suggesting only some of the changes that must be made.
The USA has some very serious problem that involves helping the rest of the world understand that they are not alone with the problems we all face. They must know once again and understand the people of the USA care! Obama has alluded to that issue recently. But the most important issue of all, who doubt Obama-for the first time I think in the annals of recent history or memory-the young people are involved with the democratic process. They believe in what this country could become and I with all my remaining breath will help them to do it. I too refuse to give up on hope what I once believed in and fought for, and what could become the global dream instead of the failed selfish American Dream that has become the global nightmare!
The future belongs to the young and it will be they who must take up the mantle of true change, which Obama offers and later in this primary and presidential race, all the others echoed! They the young want to make this country become what all of us here once hoped it would be, like Gore Vidal. So many of us who write here are disappointed, but for those who like what Rev. Wright said, and spoke to the issues of his life, he has to be bitter and critical about the past, I agree. He simply says many of things that Dr. Martin Luther King spoke to. Michelle Obama, now being attacked and will no doubt be attacked by the Republicrats, is referring obliquely to American racism, which still exists. What Michelle Obama experienced is typical by white racist America that refuses to look in the mirror although it is now cracking not only for racism but for corporatism as well.
I search my mind in wonder at the scientific and social perfection that has been attained in this forum. We have glorious information at out fingertips to tell us in great detail how we are destroying the world for human habitation. Since these blogs are a cross section of the so-called erudite community and writers who combined make the right-wing decisions of those who have been conditioned to find meaning by trying to think, I am amused with the petty squabbles undertaken here to prove that one has the intellectual rectitude to tell other fellows how to deal with crisis.
Having had a our say at the computer, well satisfied that our studious application of the accumulated data offered up here has been properly digested, showing our intellects to be above the fray we continue to defend our miniscule positions of rectitude, that allow cursing at others for some, impugning character for others, showing our Republican party credentials for some - we know that that brand is truly American-showing our professional credentials, engineering or letters offered in proper ego sneering mode, in some instances- a group brought together to speak to the problems of humanity facing disaster. How good, a blog -(definition- a collection of opinion based nonsense that lands right beside the point!) - as rarely seen in the annals human development.
Certainly a places of higher learning have produced great advances in species development but at the same time, based on the imperfect nature of thought a have allowed these advances and breakthroughs in science to turn those developments back on their creators. After a successful blog, the writers, having satisfied themselves with their contributions to the greater good, turn to the financial media to see whether their fortunes have gained significantly during their pursuit of ego gratification, so they may live out their days peacefully amused, as the remainder of the world suffers the agony of western invention and greed. As spoken from the White House, "let them eat cake" and may they choke, on it as their Asthma inhalers have lost their ability to forestall the wonders of air pollution.
I find my attention drawn to other thoughts when I read the bickering of whether the methane is spewing, leaking, puffing, or gaining greater more importance as it impacts on the climate change. I think of the institutions of science and the government led by a group of evil men and women from both parties, who in the pursuit of power, would care so little about humanity that the present leader "evildoer" would veto a bill to reduce the impact of work to limit emissions of the very gasses that would essentially destroy their children's lives. When one speaks of evil it cannot be greater than to directly affect the life of one's progeny, never mind the world where it will exist. Cold-blooded reptiles offer more protection and care for their offspring.
I have commented on previous science presented here on CD associated with climate change since this is my work. Many here echo many of my thoughts, as those above, associating GDP with CO2 but it must be recognized this condition is also associated with the laws of the USA, the governing establishment and the values of the culture which would vote for "Wall Street profit" above human survival. The places of higher learning and scientific development also teach successive generations value systems, the rule of law necessary for any society and should be discussing human purpose and meaning as it has developed over the eons of species advance.
This time we are the catalyst for our own extinction. The Chinese are producing more coal plants that will substantially diminish their fresh water supplies as well as adding to the globes greenhouse gasses, is a grand example of this environment be damned global economy. The ethanol versus food production shows us that the chance to change rapidly is out of our grasp. We have all done it!
Who has turned off their life style or their 401ks? America's selfish opportunism has turned love to stone? Will we spin to oblivion on a dead planet, probably? Where is the profit to be found here can someone from Wall Street explain this? 
Their is a fundamental feedback problem between the economic styles that Americans are trying to get the world to accept; a consumer disposable auto centered existence, and its affect on continued life.
Sadly, the most important survival mechanism which are associated with those ideas of higher levels in thought are absent in most current curriculums, or considered so abstract they rarely find their ways into the deliberations that are involved with the discussions surrounding, for example, the use of coal to power a culture or society (most of the so-called developed world). This however is appropriate if we consider that we use Jurassic energy conversion to continue the existence of Jurassic thinkers in the present day.
I am still suffering from "shock and awe" of the "Stern Report" commissioned by the UK for the "edification" of the global community, with regard to: the dangers of climate change to the world economy. Many of you remember the UK our partners in war, global hegemony, imperialism, lying to the electorate and also a great coal and oil burning culture. The economic report was trying to let the G8 economy down easily by accepting anywhere from three to five degrees of warming. It found that the economy could stand this amount of warming as inevitable but by acting immediately through a "cap in trade" philosophy the West could continue on its merry-way to greater consumption unabated. This philosophy is flawed from the outset by accepting pollution at all, particularly under this present circumstance of a ten-year window for survival.
It must be remembered that James Hansen has warned that western culture, now joined by the Chinese and Indians, has a TEN-YEAR window to radically shift its economic direction and choices of energy into a less Jurassically intense mentality. However, Hansen too thinks we have time to retool and believes we have until 2050 to make these changes. I have reminded him that less than five years ago we had until 2100 to make these changes. We have lost 50 years of that projection in two years. At the current rate of scientific perfectitude the forty-year time frame remaining may be down to the ten years, Hansen has predicted from the outset of his research. To his credit his measurement abilities have been enhanced by the Grace satellite- greater technology to deal with greater technological disaster.
Lobo Gris June 2nd, 2008 6:04 am
"Gail June 1st, 2008 12:03 pm
"I'll take the lesser of the evils!"
As long as you are willing to accept that as the best you can get, that is all that you will get.
Lobo Gris"
Lobo,
If a progressive democrat like Dennis Kucinich can't even make it through the primaries, do you really believe a third party candidate has any chance of getting elected?
Denial will get us nowhere and John McCain will continue to take us in reverse. So, yes, I'll take the best we can get at this particular time in the real world.
- and then we have a return to We the People Democracy - Green Island
Hi found this highly informative article through a link from VoteNader.org. I don't reckon I'd get here quite as easily from Senator Obama's website. Sorry, but simple as this test is, I think it a good predictor of who will or will not try to bring the depth of transformation Mr. Hedges suggests we need as to the degree of corporate control of our lives and world. Vote for the change you can REALLY believe in.
You call for action, here I am! The government is not just in our name. It is ours for the taking. It was given in trust, under oath, by contract of the US Constitution, a covenant between the People and those entrusted in sorts of elections, of be representative of the public will and interest.
What never happened, unless we are talking about the top 10% getting the top 1% of them; to represent them - they will, but only as their accomplices in repressing the lower 90% and serve as the imperial capitalist bodyguards in defending the de facto Plutocracy, that was designed to kill Democracy.
Everyone has to take back their proxy, this is, do not surrender it to candidates for office. You are signing a blank check to deal in your name, to vote for war, starve the poor, imprison free speech, and end life on this planet.
Instead, popular vote on National Referendums on the war, taxation, education, corporations, war crimes, income levels, supreme court decisions, ratify treaties, amend the constitution, and that is called self-government in not a republic, it is democracy, in fact, it is Pure Democracy, and the only honest, ethical, and workable system of government. We have the internet and do not need to wait for months or years or centuries to solve the problems created by government that never did represent us.
And you have to face that the whole basis for everything is 9/11 and understand by now, that is was staged, delivered, and used to violate the Nuremberg Principles, the Geneva Conventions, the Treaty on the Prevent and Punishment for the Crime of Genocide.
So, to not face up to 9/11 as being totally perpetrated by ruling elements in the US fascist war machine is denial, of they have put a gun to your head. If you think you can believe those liars on 9/11 and nothing else; you are insane. For believing them you are, no credible evidence to their story exist, but on the contrary they are convicted by all that have objectively looked into it, if not being able to see through it as Operation Northwoods with a rewrite, which exactly true in my case.
Systemic change is what demands discussion, debate comes with democracy and with no mercenary elements are play, the common sense get better and better. As for the poor Christians being fascist, so are their rich relatives if they have any. God was a fascist, a mass murdering, world destroying ego-maniac, totalitarian psychopath. And if we are to judge him by the fruit, he is the devil, so where must be God, he is/she a prisoner defamed in hell. Is that the riddle, the irony, or is superstition and denial so simpatico. that it is a choice, to vote for, believe this, just because you want to, and no serious social debate on political matters. Just little cheap ballots cast in strange little places, and we know it is harder to get a drivers license or library card. And why not, we are deciding nothing, unless propositions are on the ballot, as can happen on 24 states now. But never once on the national level.
I am floating this idea because it is necessary, what I am told is, "that will end politics" and that is exactly what we need in America.
evanj, it's not the personhood, it's the citizenship. "Corporate citizenship" is a contradiction in terms. The very idea is condemned by Jefferson, Lincoln and FDR as a profound threat to democracy.
Well, now that they've been proved right,such "citizenship" needs to be revoked.
Now.
We could go a long way by eliminating legal personhood for the corporation.
willybill June 1st, 2008 says:
"Serious voters MUST do their own research via the internet, READING, and intelligent discussion if they wish to come to a truly INFORMED decision."
that's the real nub of politics allways has been and allways will be...
now here's the flip side of that coin....
the better educated the general populace are the less likely they are to accept low paid mundane employment...
and here's the killer
the vast majority of jobs are low paid and mundane...
factory workers..street cleaners..sewage maintainance..supermarket workers..the list is near endless...and those jobs absolutely and without exception need to be filled with a workforce and population that will tolerate such mundane and often entirely unpleasant employment...
this isn't optional...these jobs have to be done by somebody..
only the "lower classes" will accept such jobs...
educate them beyond a certain point and they will no longer tolerate such employment
this is a huge problem for the governement big buisness and the governements of democracys..this is the big lie at the heart of it all.
one man one vote...the uneducated vote counts exactly the same as the educated vote....and society/economy/civilisation it self breaks down completely if people refuse to work under such conditions..
some one has to do these jobs....conundrum...how do you create an under class that will accept these jobs as being "their lot"
and if you educate them to the extent that they will no longer tolerate such poor prospects for their lives...who will then do those jobs?
no matter what is said or done the "serfs" are as essentail as the CEO's
the fact that the supermarket shelf stacker gets paid according to his/her socail status rather that according to the value of the work is the genuine illusion...that is the dream at work...
it gets worse when we realise that the "lower classes" are deliberately exploited and manipulated to ensure that those in power stay that way
but in our civilisation those "lower classes" are as essential as oil water food or any other resource....governments walk a tight rope with this every day..
but as long as they remain underpaid and undervalued the lie remains ...
the trouble is that the economy cannot support higher wages for these workers as it stands....so their wages are deliberately kept low...as a mechanism of the economy and a form of socail control....so there you have it...round and round and round it goes...like a dog chasing it's tail..
Gail June 1st, 2008 12:03 pm
"I'll take the lesser of the evils!"
As long as you are willing to accept that as the best you can get, that is all that you will get.
Lobo Gris
ONE REASON FOR HOPE: The Internet. The only democratic media forum left IS the internet. Which is why preserving NET NEUTRALITY will be THE FIGHT of the next decade if we harbor any hope at all for the possibility of a more sane, democratically progressive future. And make no mistake. The moneyed interests see the current internet as the greatest threat to their dominance. That is why the Corporatists and their subsidiaries (the Comcasts, the Verizons, the Quests) are proposing innocent sounding pieces of legislation that contain phrases like "Internet Deregulation" and "Internet Freedom". Those are code words for allowing the folks that own the internet pipelines to "control" content without interference from the government. Without a democratic media outlet, of which the internet is the only one, anything we want to change is a dead subject. So get ready people for the REAL Fight coming up. Preserve Net Neutrality!
"Fear and instability has plunged the working class into personal and economic despair, and not surprisingly into the arms of the demagogues and charlatans of the radical Christian right who offer a belief in magic, miracles and the fiction of a utopian Christian nation. And unless we re-enfranchise these Americans back into the economy, unless we give them hope, our democracy is doomed."
This is what also happens in Russia. There we have Black Hundreds, our national kind of radical Christian right. Add to this new Paganism -- real Nazis. But Chris Hedges only scratches the surface. He states the obvious: in desperation the low middle-class seeks hope in American fascism. And that's the direction things are going in this country, both from above and below. Why fascism? Why not communism? Because before the United States citizenry have become what they are now--i.e., politically impotent and atomized "proud individuals"--the country went through the anticommunist conditioning. Anticommunism has become THE American religion. Hedges clearly does not realize that he speaks as a good believer in this religion when he quotes Hannah Arendt--student and lover of the Nazi philosopher Heidegger--about "totalitarianism," which is the concept invented for the needs of the Cold War. No wonder he has nobody to turn to but St. Augustin to save us from "the corporate state," that is -- fascism. Fascism used to be thought by Marxists as the extreme form of anticommunism, the last resort of big bourgeoisie in its fight against working class organizations. But what we see in this country is the growth of fascism in the virtual absence of organized and politically self-conscious working class. Why fascism then? I believe it is because the American neocolonial empire is in a steep decline. Those standards of living that Hedges is so nostalgic about could not last for ever. There are no miracles in this world. The relative prosperity of US workers allowed them, for a moment, to imagine themselves little bourgeois ("middle class") was based on the privileged position of the United States in the post-WWII world and the imperative to pacify the lower classes and the blacks when facing the Soviet enemy. But once the Soviet Union was destroyed this imperative disappeared with it and the class war from above began in serious, they called "deregulation," "liberalization" and the rest of the Newspeak vocab. And the American workers brainwashed by anticommunism, steeped in chauvinism and racism, found themselves defenseless, unable to create their fighting class organizations, and became an easy prey for fascist demagogues. Russians have a popular saying: They aimed at communism but hit Russia. This is also true about the United States: its anticommunism has now backfired and robbed its working people of their strength.
This is a groundbreaking, important speech. The more of us who can write and deliver such speeches, the better. The essence of the idea is the "corporate state." Charles Derber in his book "Hidden Power" elaborates the concept under the name "corporate regime." Since it spans political parties, and takes them over, it expands the debate about history, and therefore, gives us a better vision of the future beyond rule by the other party. In Derber's terminology, the vision is a new progressive regime (in Hedges terminology the corporate state would become a progressive state, like the New Deal state of 1932 to about 1975). Of course solutions to transform the corporate regime (or state) into a new progressive regime (or state) remain to be developed and implemented. But he made reference to anger, courage and hope, surely emotional resources for each of us. And his call is clear: "militancy, to challenge those in the Democratic and Republican parties who herd us towards the corporate state." How shall we challenge those in both parties? THAT is the solution for progressives. It will involve the Green Party. It will involve infiltration of the Democratic Party. It will involve activism, and movements, and militancy, and constitutional conventions and amendments, and political unity we have yet to invent. But we can, we must, rise up to bring about a progressive regime from what will be the ruins of the corporate regime of America.
Corporate State: 1980 to 20__? RIP
Let us implement the new New Deal. And expunge the militarist, imperial, military-industrial-corporate-congressional complex and its corruption of our nation forever.
Bravo Hedges! And bravo to all of you posters who don't yield to cynicism: the rejection of solutions with self-fulfilling, psychological defense of weakness to power.
"The growing class divide is not understood, despite the glibness of many in the media, by complicated sets of statistics or the absurd, utopian faith in unregulated globalization and complicated trade deals. It is understood in the eyes of a man or woman who is no longer making enough money to live with dignity and hope."
It is not really understood by them either. I see a growing discontent with
"LOCAL Government" as the source of the economic squeeze; NOT the Corporatocracy which is in reality spending citizen tax dollars tax dollars to manufacture those obsolete, so 20th century cold war submarinesinstead of supporting the NCLB mandate, or medicare or small business. WHen state & local governments try to solve the lack of funding by ; say, proposing school consolidation, They will be voted out of office in favor of some wiley Repug. Maine's Dem. Gov,. Baldacci is in great disfavor now, as is my Town manager also a Democrate.
Those of us who do understand, need to fill in the connecting lin, in simple language NOT statistics!
"I'll take the lesser of the evils!" Vote Roehme he'll change the Nazi party for good, no really I promise.
John C June 1st, 2008 2:23 pm ...Aye! That's the rub! Personally, I have never had any luck with persuasion. It seems the first and most important step would be to get them to turn off the TV....ever try that??..Good luck. Next, suggest reading a book...good luck once again. Third? Form your own opinion. Now, that may be the EASIEST step.
A remarkable article by Chris Hughes!!!
A renewed participatory democracy is the answer. And it does not take many devoted citizens to bring about radical social change, no more than 3-4 percent.
This understanding of how little it takes to succeed should be the foundation for realistic democratic hope and determined civic activism.
Success depends on only the deterrmined few.
That is why I will be joining for the first two weeks of the Witness Against War 2008 walk from Chicago to St Paul, July 12th to August 31st, ending at the Republican National Convention. It is sponsored by Voices for Creative Nonviolence (familiar with the name Kathy Kelly during the start of the Iraq war???).
This can only snow-ball into national significance if people anyhwere near the march route would join as war resisters for at least one day, more if possible. Now that is democratic activism!!!!.
Go to: witnessagainstwar@vcnv.org
rocyahsoul June 1st, 2008 11:57 am ...Still waiting for that evidence against Nader....
willybill June 1st, 2008 says:
"Serious voters MUST do their own research via the internet, READING, and intelligent discussion if they wish to come to a truly INFORMED decision."
Yes - reading and intelligent discussion amongst informed and intelligent people is the only hope for truth and wisdom to emerge.
That's the easy part. The hard part is to persuade the rest of the people that you know better than all the stuff they hear on the networks.
Mark Whittington June 1st, 2008 12:07 pm ..Herein is one of, if not the major problem with today's voting citizen. They're getting their info on candidates from the distorting bought and paid for MSM. Serious voters MUST do their own research via the internet, READING, and intelligent discussion if they wish to come to a truly INFORMED decision. If you are forming an opinion from watching these ridiculous debates, you are insulting your own intelligence and playing in THEIR world.
Unfortunately, things ARE as bad as Chris Hedges notes in his fine speech. But why must we "hope & pray" for some messiah like Obama to lift us out of our misery? How can we expect "change" from the same groups (Repubs and Demos) that, with the assistance of the corporations, put us here in the first place? Any meaningful change has to come from INDIVIDUAL effort to affect the change that is necessary if America is to remain "free" within the narrow confines of the definition. The only way we can break the chains of corporate rule is to stop participating in their game...stop buying their stuff as much as possible. Buy used. Recycle. Grow some of your own food. Stop consuming so much. As long as we are willing to buy into their "American Dream," the corporate masters will continue to have us by our balls.
governments refuse to educate the public about the issues they face
which are mind boggling especailly in the face of the trauma of globalisation climate change resource management and the lack there-of, cultural and religiuos incompatibility and political incompatibility which accompanies this also..it's pandoras box
of course our own blindness has created the problems now faced
but that blindness has been cultivated and this is the dangerous and scary part ..it is still being cultivated...if the governments and even big buisness (upon we all unavoidable rely for our very existance)
began to EDUCATE the general public slowly towards an understanding of just how complex the issues are then we would slowly begin to if not trust them then at least be more patient regarding their decisions...but as it is on the whole we are left with the isanity of spin doctoring soap opera type emotional manipulations and the condensing down of the issues to almost psychotic "black and white" positions and statements and indeed policies..
dang it all...you'd be insane not to become paranoid under those circumstances..take the imaginary or real (depending on your point of view) traditional comments on the existance of UFO's for example...
the assumption is that the public can't cope with the existance there-of so they are kept in the dark..leading to endless debate conjecture conspiracy theaorys ad infinitum one way or the other the result is the same..a lack of trust.. it doesn't even matter who's right anymore the damage is done
the same applys to the reasoning behind big buisness and it's hold on the economy and political decisions and heads of government...
without a clear and determined effort on behalf of the powers that be the educate EVERY-ONE the result is a type of socailised anarchy that boils just under the surface fracturing society into ever smaller groups of opposing beliefs and viewpoints...
and that education really does need to inculde every-one and really does need to come from the government because otherwise it does nothing other than create yet another under-class comprised of those who feel they have educated themsleves from sources such as this site et al...and those whose opinions and understanding is drawn only from the mainstream media sources ..and so on..
i guess the issue boils down the question..why has the government and big buisness (read as the same enitity at the end of the day)failed to do this erudite act of education....well as was often proposed during the period when it was being debated wether to educate the general public to a basic level of schooling..reading, writing basic maths skills etc etc...ie the introduction of schooling for all that so shaped the begining of the last century...it was said by many in the then government and intellectual cirlces that such education was inherently dangerous to the status quo...
i don't suppose anything has changed..
there is no such thing as democracy in a state that witholds information...information (and the education to know how to interpret that information) that is neccesary and essential if the general public is to vote in any way shape of form in a manner that truly reflects the needs of that state or country...(or world for that matter)
ergo there is no such thing as democracy untill such education is introduced free for ALL during the normal compulsory schooling routine of it's citizens...
this is no more a democracy that the moon is made of swiss cheese
as the man said..it's merely a ruling class and a serfdom to support that ruling class...the only concession made is that it is possible for a serf to become one of the ruling class..hardly democracy
the real ball breaker of this is ofcourse that it is not possible for all the serfs to become members of the ruling class..because quite simply put..some one really does have to clean the streets..work the checkouts at supermarkets etc etc etc...so it is in the end a con
"I agree with the comment on 'hope' as well, just an idea that keeps people unempowered, looking for better days, but not doing anything concrete to make it happen."
What, at least, needs to happen is an honest to God threat of real revolution - enough to scare the living s--t out of the CEO's who are the core problem in our society. They are at the core of American imperialism and also are the greatest obstruction to social progress. There will be no "hope" until we constrain the power of corporations - and they are immune to the power tools of "democracy" and "votes". Seatle was only a start.
#
Domino June 1st, 2008 4:15 am
"Does not answer the question, "Toaster Strudel or Pop Tarts?""
Sure it does. The article tells you that both Toaster Strudel and Pop Tarts are toxic and that the real answer is wheat toast with natural jam.
Lobo Gris
Outstanding article. Another Bill Clinton anti-worker class example was passage of 1996 Telecommunications Act. Allowed mega-media consolidation leading to the Big Four of today: AOL-Time Warner, Viacom, Disney and News Group. Media reform is sorely needed.
Key point missing from most comments is the critical importance of grassroots people organizing for economic and social justice. We all can and must be active participants.
Can't put all our eggs blindly in the Democratic Party basket. Pressuring local and state legislators via meetings, phone calls and letters/e-mails DO have an impact if enough people do it. Here in Massachusetts the legislature is overwhelmingly Democratic, yet we always have to organize to put progressive pressure on them because of corporate power influence on them.
Finally, union-community alliances can accomplish much on the road to economic and social justice.
This is one of the most important articles to have been posted on Common Dreams. This is what I have been saying for fifteen years, albeit much less eloquently.
One definition of insanity is to keep repeating the same actions (voting Democrat or Republican) while each time expecting different results. And it's not like change can't occur. If all those who have expressed enough disgust with the present duopoly to register as an independent would vote independent we could indeed have change and movement in the right direction.
For those of you who continue to believe that voting Democrat will change things I leave you with this from the article, which you didn't read, didn't understand, or just plain choose to ignore.
"Clinton argued that the party had to ditch labor unions, no longer a source of votes or power, as a political ally. Workers, he insisted, would vote Democratic anyway. They had no choice."
Lobo Gris
"Okay, you can lynch me again, now. But I'm right on this."
Dunno how 'right' you are, or have-been, about 'much of anything'...
BUT, you ARE sounding a bit-more nuanced and 'sane' -- I'll acknowedge that-much (your tenure/education here has helped!).
I'm saying that class includes race and gender whereas race and gender don't necessarily include class. The Democratic Party, judging by its rhetoric, is just as racist and sexist as the Republican Party is (Just in the opposite way).
I watched the Democratic debate where all of the candidates essentially agreed on TV that Edwards didn't have a chance because he was white and a man in lieu of the preferable female and black candidates. Every white working class person I spoke to afterward the debate saw the party as being anti white male. I'm sick of being sabotaged by dumb rhetoric. Where I live in SC, you can bet that I'm taking serious chances by promoting a political party that inevitably alienates the very people that I'm trying to recruit. Eventually I'm going to stop taking the chance.
rocyahsoul June 1st, 2008 11:57 am.. Do you have any EVIDENCE of this accusation against Nader?
Mark Whittington June 1st, 2008 10:38 am
"Why on earth would working white voters replace one oppressor group with another?"
From a historical perspective, the "other" oppressor group is more likely to extend unemployment benefits after your job is outsourced; more likely to help you get health care when you can no longer afford it; more likely to give your kids an education; and more likely to save social security.
The republicans on the other hand, have fought against extending or creating any benefits for the "working class" while giving major tax breaks and writing legislation to benefit the wealthiest 1% in this country.
If there wasn't so much apathy and ignorance in this country, we would have a viable third party that could get elected and perhaps make the changes that are needed to bring back the country we once loved and honored.
Sadly, the reality is that apathy and ignorance aren't going to vanish over-night, leaving us with the same oppressive, two-party system.
I'll take the lesser of the evils!
"FOr me the start is to VOTE FOR ANYONE BUT THE TWO PARTIES."
Mmmm, nice try but the libertarian party has now chosen an establishment politician as their candidate and R.Nader has been exposed as a money interested playboy caught up in a back scratching effort with a lawyers guild who are out for power and money by tort.
I'd only add that "we" are simply where the victims of capitalism have always been---under the businessman's colonizing heel.
Does not answer the question, "Toaster Strudel or Pop Tarts?"
Nikola Tesla's Earthquake Machine: With Tesla's Original Patents Plus New Blueprints to Build Your Own Working Model
http://a848.ac-images.myspacecdn.com/images01/55/l_0c5c7b96bf1dc374f050180a00d617ff.jpg
Human Engineered Earthquakes
by Ray Bilger
http://www.rense.com/political/weapons/earthqk.htm
30 mins before the 2008 Sichuan earthquake in China
The sky lit up in a rainbow of colors.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KKMTSDzU1Z4
Sky a glow in mural on wall in elementary school was apparently propagada.
http://viewmorepics.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=viewImage&friendID=17226212&albumID=1913353&image...
Great article! I love how he leaves it to the reader to interpret or find their own solutions...but a suggestion or suggestions would have been good too. We the People really need to get off that couch and do something with our short time here on this precious planet. Seems like everyone in my age group (18-30) is more concerned about playing stupid diversionary games, living in la la land of Grand Theft Auto 4 or Halo 3. Sometimes i get sucked into it as well, but i am tired of 'games', lets get off our collective asses and make change happen!
I agree with the comment on 'hope' as well, just an idea that keeps people unempowered, looking for better days, but not doing anything concrete to make it happen.
Elections (and the governments they do not influence) are controlled by those who need to be reigned in.
Why then does most everyone continuously pretend that such hypocrisy and deception will produce anything but more of the same?
A. They do not want change, they actually like what is happening (or they can play 'by the rules' (safe) and still dream of a better world).
If those who run the show need to be controlled and they are still allowed to write ALL the laws, control ALL the courts, All the police, ALL commerce and corporations, ALL media...
??? HOW DO YOU expect to MAKE ANY CHANGES ???
Do you really think that you can 'elect' someone and that ONE person will stand against all the madness...???
??? WHO IS NOT ASLEEP HERE ??? ??? Anyone ???
You people are living in la la land...
We are dealing with an International MAFIA on steroids..
with think tanks filled with hundreds of thousands of super-geek prostitutes building all sorts of spying, assault weapons, psychological control scripts, etc.,etc., etc.
And they give you a ridiculous figure, an Obama, a Hillary, a McCain... a Nader... and you think that is going to bring down this MAFIOSA????
God damn! This is so freaky surreal!
I tell you what; take my post to your university, use it as evidence that you were not only not educated, you were crippled by their teachings...
!!!! and, DEMAND YOUR MONEY BACK with PENALTIES!!!!
The Democrats have gone to the well once too often. I'm voting Green no matter what!!!
Hmmm, great speech and interesting commentary. It is nice to have a lot of it in one, easy-to-read piece. I say a lot because there was much Hedges omitted: agribusiness' GMOs; monopolies on seed and patents on life forms; young folks' addiction to technology and their headlong rush to embrace wireless (aka easily-tapped) communications; the privatization (is that really a word?) of public utilities (gas, electric, water, communications); net neutrality; the deification of the military hero (great comment, ezeflyer); the duopoly manifested by the caduceus of the (D) and (R) parties, excluding all others and erecting anti-fusion laws to maintain their hold on power; media conglomeration; weakened educational systems, resulting in a populace unfamiliar with independent, critical thinking; ad nauseum.
I can't believe how obsessed people, even we here at CD, are with heroes and leaders. Democracy means government of and by the people! Unfortunately, I have begun to realize that the population of this country, not to mention its vast size, means democracy is a failed experiment. Democracy requires an informed, involved, participatory body politic; see anything even remotely resembling that in your neck of the woods?
Broken down into more or less semi autonomous, geographically-defined regions that are governed by lottery-selected one-term representatives (from the professional-worker-student-farmer associations or whatever), where most politics really become local again, might be a place to start. At least it would have us on a platform which would be infinitely malleable and adjustable. Sorry...started rambling.
Cast your vote for Nader, or, better yet, McKinney (so hopefully the Green Party can get enough votes to qualify for federal funds next trip out of the barn) and, if nothing else, we may scare the shit out of Dean and his party to the point where they begin listening to us again. If not, we have the beginnings of an alternative party that better represents our values.
Or, you can join me as I cast about for a friendly, socialist-democratic nation to which I, my partner, and (now 63) kitties can relocate.
For over thirty years Americans have transformed from Citizens to consumers. Having lost their Citizenship skills and now their money to consume American's are transforming again into kindling for the Fascist fire. Quietly allowing the shredding of the Constitution for consumer comforts has it's reward, ashes. As much as I would like to believe in the goodness of all mankind, I don't. People made their choices and must now face the consequences. Unfortunately those of us who upheld our responsibilities must go down with them since we are all related. The good and the bad both will perish but hopefully the good will rise once again and move mankind forward. Trashing the gift of life seems to be mankind's M.O.
George Wanker Bush gave the commencement address at Furman University today and told the grads that who they are is more important than what they own. LOL. Do you believe the hard bark on this piece of crap? As far as Bush is concerned, as far as any Republican is concerned, what you own makes you who you are. And you can get it any way you please; in fact, ripping people off to increase your own wealth is preferred to making money honestly, as it is the aggressive, the devious and the cold bloodedly cynical who are the Republicans' golden people. Someone should take the president of Furman (who invited Bush) and throw him off the roof of the tallest building on campus head first.
The psychopath elite are not going to give you your country back. Voting for Obama will change nothing. 1+1 = ..........
As for amending the constitution, the psychopaths say, yea!. WhoTF do you think would write the friggin amendment. Too much sun son.
rebelnow:
I am a surfer. Surfing taught me to lose all fear. The bigger the wave the better.
I believe though, that you have hope, confused with blind faith. Blind faith, the stuff of religions, instructs you to accept your condition.
Hope gives you power, perseverance, and courage. Do you recall Jesse Jackson's famous line? "Hope not Dope!" Hope keeps you going. Hope says that the sacrafice and suffering will lead to better times.
If it weren't for "Hope" I wouldn't be posting on commondreams. I hope that my posts affect some people, which affect other people, which will lead to change.
Keep Hope Alive
Ammendment to the Constitution of the United States of America - "Our last best hope."
Neither hope nor faith are the problem. But blind hope and blind faith are serious problems and the USA has plenty of them.
I am not a religious person, but I have faith in humanity. I believe that we have the capacity and creativity to deal with the problems Chris Hedges has outlined so well.
In my view, the biggest problem we face, bigger than the problems described in the article above, is the idea that "There Is No Alternative" or "T.I.N.A." to our economic/political system.
Americans may not like what is happening to our country, but they don't think they can do anything about it. So, too many of them, don't.
Too many of us have internalized the propaganda of T.I.N.A.
When we believe that we can change things, we will shift from "what can we do?" (dis-empowerment) to "let me tell you what we are doing" (empowerment). The majority of the US population agrees with the goals of activists. This has not always been the case. We have great potential for positive change right now. It is a hopeful time. If we desire a different reality, we need to believe in the reality of our desires.
REBEL NOW said, "Hope is a concept conditioned by a Judeo-Christian hierarchy designed to keep the sheep in line." I agree with the premise, but it's not limited to Judeo-Christian. Some criticize the belief in karma/reincarnation as a promise for better another time, but keep digging that ditch right now.
DAV FIN: "I'm a University qualified - media/literature baker," talk about making food for thought TASTE good? Now about those calorie exemption cards...
I suppose what we are witnessing here, apart from corporate subversion of democracy, is good old fashioned greed. The free market and the re invention of 19th century economic models starting with Thatcher in the 70s has given some in the developed world the opportunity to make killings of extraordinary value. Like all greedy people, they eventually run out of luck, but this time, their greed and selfishness is possibly going to take millions of others with them.
There seems to be no ability for these types of people to understand the interconnectedness of everything, nothing is independent from their actions, just as we know that our actions and deeds do have consequences. Money, extreme wealth and the things that it provides have allowed them to feel and be untouchable. This is unlikely to continue.
I should not smirk, I should not be vindictive, my mother always told me not to be, but maybe its about time we the people finally jumped on our high horse, our soap box, and yell from the tallest steeple; "I Told You So".
PS. I'm a University qualified - media/literature baker, and proud of it. Just because I'm a baker it does not mean I don't think. This is indeed the other issue. The powerful imagine that we don't, but we do. While making and moulding my dough I often think and despair at where the world is heading.
"They believe the abundant materialism they propose to create will overwhelm existing differences. As manager and creators of the system they will rule the future."
The proof is in the pudding. We have 'abundant materialism'.
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-9169455490161627258&q=%5EChina+Blue&ei=BZYISL-aH6b82gKS_K2vAQ...
(Please watch the video, 'China Blue', about the life of a young Chinese girl and factory worker. It is very informative)
In the seventies, such factories were everywhere in certain parts of Taiwan. I worked in one (that made electronic parts) briefly in '72... and for years could not buy any electronics remembering the girls who had been kind to me during those few strange weeks...
I also met a few of the foreign managers.
In those days, if you knew nothing and were very tall and very white... you might be asked to go 'manage' such an operation for a company having its parts made in these labor camps...
young men with no other skill than their presence tended to intimidate the girls working in the factories... got the E tickets and easily (and somewhat guiltily) would admit that they actually knew nothing about what they were suppose to manage.
Rick said: "Barry Goldwater in 79 said 'What the trilateralists truly intend is the creation of a worldwide economic power superior to the political governments of the nation-states involved. They believe the abundant materialism they propose to create will overwhelm existing differences. As manager and creators of the system they will rule the future.'
Wow. What a vision. I actually agree with that. Unfortunately, it DOES call for 'one world government' (voted in, of course) as a balance to what would otherwise be rampant capitalism. Look: there are two combatants in capitalism: labor and capital. The referee is government. What goldwater is niavely calling for is ascendence of capital against labor, without any kind of government referee to prevent a bloodbath. But such unchecked ascendence breeds autonomy, and autonomy (not power) corrupts. In this case, it would lead to capital beating labor into a bloody pulp (which is also called outsourcing). With one-world capitalism (which we already functionally have) we need governments around the world to collaborate to 'referee' capitalism, or labor will continually find itself on the short end of the stick.
A really great article, and unfortunately very very accurate. But there is NO political answer to this hole we have gotten ourselves into, even if by some miricle someone like Ralph Nader was to get elected, if he got too much in the way he would simply be eliminated. There is just no way that this can be done one politician at a time, look at Paul Wellstone.
If this were virtually any other country in the world millions of people would be taking to the streets to demand that top government officals resign and the rest should drastically change or they would be out too! We could hang the bastards later. But there is nary a wimper from Americans, where is the anger and the courage? Have we really become a nation of sleeping wimps who are going to let the politicians and corporations enslave us and drive us into the ground? Seems like the answer to that question is a very loud YES, very very scary...
Here is an idea to consider:
If all workers below the level of corporate V.P. were union members, it would be make it entirely possible for the nation's workers to gain controlling interest (through investment)in all of the major corporations. From such a base, a consolidated union of American workers could easily (and peacefully) displace the CEO's from their current position of power and influence over social progress. Our elected representatives would then have no choice but to respond to the needs and the wishes of their constituents.
In a 1991 speech, given to the Trilateral commission by David Rockefeller he said:
"We are grateful to the Washington Post, The New York Times, Time magazine and other great publications who directors have attended our meetings and respected their promises of discretion for almost 40 years. It would have been impossible for us to develop our plan for the world if we had been subjected to the lights of publicity during those years. But the world is now more sophisticated and prepared to march toward a world government. The supranational sovereignty of an intellectual elite and world bankers is surely preferable to the national auto-determination practiced in past centuries."
Senator Barry Goldwater in 79 said "What the trilateralists truly intend is the creation of a worldwide economic power superior to the political governments of the nation-states involved. They believe the abundant materialism they propose to create will overwhelm existing differences. As manager and creators of the system they will rule the future.
rebelnow,
You are right. Action is needed. The smallest action is greater than the greatest prayer.
I don't wish to offend those who pray for peace.. hope for peace... that is surely much better than letting ones heart go to sleep and turning consciously away from the problem... but, one action ripples from today forward... one prayer?
Who will even hear it? And, how can it move the rest of us if we can't even hear you? And, like it or not, we are together the only savior we will ever meet… but the other creatures on this planet must guide us… and if you will begin to listen and act on what you discover… you will see that they do know how to lead you.
To rely on "hope", or anyone espousing such a vague concept, seems to imply an inherent sense of defeat. If hope is all one can muster then you are admitting that you are victim, searching longingly at some form of savior, acting helplessly.
A big wave surfer doesn't look out at 40 foot waves and say "I hope I make it". They might as well stay on the beach. No, they get on the board and with complete confidence say "fuck yeah, let me at it".
Hope is a concept conditioned by a Judeo-Christian hierarchy designed to keep the sheep in line. It implies "wait, one day things will be better, trust us." So we line up in the hope that someone or something will make it right, bring us out of our doldrums. It keeps one submissive.
Hope and hopeless, same thing, drop them both. They just get in the way of the action.
Obama lovers:
read the other piece here at CD
After Bobby Kennedy (There Was Barack Obama)
by John Pilger
http://www.commondreams.org/archive/2008/05/31/9327/
"The vacuities are familiar. Obama is his echo. Like Kennedy, Obama may well "chart a new direction for America" in specious, media-honed language, but in reality he will secure, like every president, the best damned democracy money can buy."
"In opposing a UN Security Council resolution implying criticism of Israel's starvation of the people of Gaza, Obama was ahead of both McCain and Hillary Clinton. In January, pressured by the Israel lobby, he massaged a statement that "nobody has suffered more than the Palestinian people" to now read: "Nobody has suffered more than the Palestinian people from the failure of the Palestinian leadership to recognise Israel [emphasis added]." Such is his concern for the victims of the longest, illegal military occupation of modern times. Like all the candidates, Obama has furthered Israeli/Bush fictions about Iran, whose regime, he says absurdly, "is a threat to all of us".
I don't copy everythings.... read for yourself
aliensoup,
Nice post. Wrong answer.
Obama is a representative of corporate military and in this is NO different than Hillary, McCain, Bush, etc.
"Obama's foreign policy advisor and vocal supporter is Zbigniew Brzezinski, Jimmy Carter's national security advisor, who says that Obama offers 'a new definition of America's role in the world'.
This is the same Brzezinski who created the Illuminati's Trilateral Commission with David Rockefeller in 1973. The Trilateral Commission is dedicated to a world government dictatorship and closely connects with other strands in the web like the Council on Foreign Relations (member: Barack Obama) and the Bilderberg Group.
Brzezinski's foreign 'policy' during the Carter administration, as he has since admitted without regret, was to entice the Soviet Union to invade Afghanistan in December, 1979. The idea, he said, was to weaken their rival superpower and the result was a ten-year occupation that cost the lives of an estimated 1.3 million Afghans and spawned the Mujahedin, Taliban and Osama bin Laden.
Deep breath: he's now advising Barack Obama on foreign policy ... "
http://www.godlikeproductions.com/forum1/message487849/pg1
Considering the role Brzezinski has played in setting up several of the current genocides and the opportunity for elite consolidation of power and resources...
I really think that the only possibilities for change will be based upon each and every person taking responsible steps to be a contributor to peace... and not its opposite.
If the job supports war, the job must go. If the operation supports genocide or more unfair policing and surveillance of citizens, the operation must be halted.
Our responsibility is not to choose the best leader. Our responsibility (response-ability) is to choose the best each and every day, in every way.
More intimacy with all of life is the answer... and that answer produces all the answers.
http://allinharmony.org
The corporate power paradigm (dominator society) rests upon some obvious fallacies in regard to nature and human nature. Shedding light upon these fallacies is key to a return to natural sustainability. The transition is actually MUCH EASIER to accomplish than continuing to break every natural law required for biosphere survival.
Wow! What a mouthful.
"In a word, deregulation-the systematic dismantling of the managed capitalism that was the hallmark of the American democratic state. Our political decline came about because of deregulation, the repeal of antitrust laws, and the radical transformation from a manufacturing
economy to a capital economy."
Siouxrose May 31st, 2008 4:42 pm
Nice to mention the 222. At least it would have been a short speech....walk to the podium....say, sorry...walk away from the podium.
And I believe this paragraph is the one from which all the other ills flow.
Little Brother May 31st, 2008 4:10 pm
So in opther words you believe the inevitability argument. Huuummmm, hope it works for them better than it did for Hillary. But then you agree with RichM to his delight I'm sure, they haven't accomplished one darn thing, but you are still hopeful.
mountaineer May 31st, 2008 12:56 pm
Mercy. Well, let's try to get Barack Obama elected,
==========================================
Obama is an empty suit.
Has he done anything to make Bush accountable? NO
Has he stopped funding the war? NO
Has he stopped unilaterally supporting Israel's illegal occupation of and war crimes in Palestine? NO
Stop and think. Do not participate in this "personality contest", look for concrete facts.
FOr me the start is to VOTE FOR ANYONE BUT THE TWO PARTIES.
I am in awe. This speech by Chris Hedges blew me away. What can I say, well done.
The political decision by the US power elite to deindustrialize (post-industrialization) and produce the rust belt was/is hardly noticed by the media, academia and those citizens living outside these areas.
Only Michael Moore produced a documentary that focused on deindustrialization and its consequences, "Roger and Me."
Very few pop songs, movies or TV programs bothered noticing this phenomenon.
The only way we developed a prosperous working class was through government regulations and protections that placed laws and institutions between us and US-based corporations.
The more these institutions and laws are scrapped, the more impoverished the working people become.
One problem that we possess in this society is that nobody consistently defines what Rightwing, Leftwing and Moderate actually mean.
The rightwing (or conservative) passes laws that force working people to work harder and longer for less. All forms of economic and social security are cut back.
Cultural pursuits are transformed into passive, commercial entertainment. Citizens are converted into debt-ridden consumers: serfs.
Leftwing governments pass laws that effectively allow working people to work less and less intensively while being paid more.
All forms of economic and social security are expanded.
Creative and uplifting cultural pursuits and citizen participation are highly supported.
Moderates continue things as they are.
Daniel David, Little Brother and kloro,
Well said.
RichM, not worth the effort of responding.
I've said it before, and I'll keep saying it if/until we defeat it:
"Fascism should more appropriately be called Corporatism because it is a merger of state and corporate power."
Benito Mussolini
"Fascism is a religion. The twentieth century will be known in history as the century of Fascism."
Benito Mussolini
Thank you Chris Hedges.
I agree with every observation you've made. Unfortunately, as in the climate discussion, we are very late in our awakening. The reality is, our lives mean nothing to those presently in power. We are, as you observe, expendable in this mindless pursuit of power and money. The discussion must be focused on picking up the pieces in the future. I do not wish to be tasered, imprisoned, tortured, hassled, charged, fined, or any of the other many ways power has of destroying an individuals life, with impunity. What now, are the stakes, and what will be gained? We are a stupified country. Who's really listening? The truth will never be known. There are layers and layers of lies that will die with those who tell them. Truth is now meaningless in this discussion. We are a generation who can believe nothing. Product advertisements, scientific studies, White House proclamations, 9/11 inquiries, where is the truth? It will take a few generations to gain the ability to tell the truth. While I totally agree with every one of your other points Chris, I cannot after nearly fifty years of paying attention, maintain any sense of hope for the United States of America.
We have to show the world that we are aware of the perversion of democracy in the USA, and we have to realize that we are the MAJORITY. One way to do this is to put small signs out every day. A tool I have seen used is someone writing " LIAR BUSH MURDERS FOR OIL" on dollar bills. A Sharpie magic marker works well for this task. One can pass 3 to 5 marked bills each day into circulation. Our leaders must know that the American people do not approve of this war, and would love to see Cheney and Bush impeached. Not until they are 100% sure of the groundswell of approval behind them will they act.
the big problem is cynicism. i've spent years of my life doing political organizing and the biggest obstacle in that process is peoples' cynicism.
"How did we get here? How did this happen? In a word, deregulation-the systematic dismantling of the managed capitalism that was the hallmark of the American democratic state."
We should have seen it coming with the ability of banks and corporations to concentrate money-power. That doesn't happen in direct democracies.
"We must lobby, organize and advocate for the dissolution of the World Trade Organization and NAFTA."
We can and do until we're red in the face but we're ignored. We can organize We the People by incorporating ourselves and receiving actual and equal non-transferable shares of stock in our public treasure. Who can beat a corporation? A much larger one. One person, one vote.
John F. Butterfield said: "I simply want to reduce.. every corporation to the size where I can drag it into the bathroom and drown it in my bathtub."
Careful. There's been enough pseudo-religious talk about drowning things in bathtubs the last 20 years. In this pseudo-religious country, its amazing how much damage a bad idea can end up doing. Norquist may have said it, but BUSH did it!!! And more's the pity. To move forward, we should, at the very least, acknowledge the forces that got us here (most powerful and richest country on earth, horrid at spreading her wealth for the general welfare): and that includes corporations.
"The war in Iraq has cost the lives of over 4,000 brave and honorable U.S. military personnel,"
As a military man, I say let's quit this "brave and honorable U.S. military personnel" crap. It only helps to get young idealists to enlist to become a "hero" and get sent into shit they can't escape alive, crippled, or poor.
The best summation of how we have arrived at our current situation I have yet read. I agree with everything Chris has written. One problem - no solution.
There is a solution, the only solution possible, a constitutional ammendment. po grandma is correct.
Without a constitutional ammendment, on campaign financing, corporations will be able to continue to rule the people. The Supreme Court has ruled that Money=Speech. It will take a constitutional ammendment to over-ride the Supreme Court.
If we do not do this, there is no hope, we will continue our slow motion journey into economic and political serfdom.
A constitutional ammendment on campaign financing should be the center peice of the Progressive and Libertarian movements. It is essential.
So let's discuss, design the ammendment, and begin the movement.
Article 1. Contributions to those running for elected office can only be made by individual citizens who would be represented by the elected official.
Article 2. Contributions to political parties can only be made by individual citizens not in excess of
Brilliant article, one I will also pass around.
And good work, too! to the group of 222 that made it clear they did NOT want BUSH to speak at their university for all the reasons Chris Hedges made so luminiously clear.
From the article, "If we do not become angry, if we do not muster within us the courage, indeed the militancy, to challenge those in the Democratic and Republican parties, who herd us toward the corporate state, we will have squandered our courage and our integrity when we need it the most."
Today, while filing my old pickup with $4.20 gas, I looked at some others who were filing also, "pretty bad huh?", "yeah, I hear it's may go to $5.00 by the end of the year" was the response. Another said "but what are you going to do, they got us over a barrel". "ha, ha," everyone laughed.
I may be blind but I see very little anger about the economy, the war, the totalitarian creep of government; not with neighbors, not with friends or family or corporate media or anywhere except on a few websites like Common Dreams. When I express frustration or start to rant I get "but what are you going to do about it? it's out of our control".
So with that in mind I tend to agree with frank1569 above "Arm yourselves, train for survival, and get ready to go to the mattresses".
Meanwhile also read Bugliosi's book. Do what we can legally to end this madness.
Excellent article!
Nothing will ever change for any length of time until we amend the Constitution. Take away corporations' 'personhood' status and they will no longer have equal [or better] protection under the law. Then we can make campaign finance stick. Molly Ivans always said nothing will change without campaign finance reform, but first we must deal with this corporate welfare and greed.
Ah, the inestimable RichM stopped by while I was whimsically, but sincerely, responding to hemp.
The incrementalist strategy recommended by moderate partisan Democrats is also predicated, in part, on the intertwined double helix formed by two assumptions: first, the practical assessment that once the Democrats have finally established a commanding edge in votes, they will ride a fresh tsunami of support, with abundant momentum to promptly begin remedial measures, from icing the abominable Lieberman to belatedly making good on deconstructing the multifarious evils of our malificent maladministration.
Second, to the extent that a Democratic administration and congressional supermajority fails to address inconvenient concerns, vigorous and sustained public activism will successfully influence and push government toward long-rejected progressive values.
Just as the magnetic poles of the Earth "flip" polarity every few eons, the implication is that a Democratic landslide will at long last flip the polarity of political power from "top-down" to "bottom-up". So it's the Democrat's turn to sit astride the pendulum-- and anyway, it's the only ride in town!
Ya gotta believe. Ya gotta believe...
Yeah, hemp-- one can't help but think that if someone had managed to slip the occasional doobie into that elegant cigarette holder that was FDR'S trademark, that the only conflict in the Middle East today would be between hashish dealers underbidding each other to capture the American export market!
The mind simply boggles... In reaction to a statement of our current predicament as comprehensive & powerful as Hedges' article, we have obedient little minds coming onto CD to write things like "Well, let's try to get Barack Obama elected, along with a majority of democrats in Congress."
Excuse me, idiots, but that's not in the slightest what the article said. If you think that's a response to the article, you didn't read or understand the article.
The resident CD idiot Democrat, Daniel David (1:56), blesses us with this wisdom: "Your first (and only) "organizing" that's going to matter at all and will enable (or not) everything else you try to do is to get your country organized enough to elect Democrats to your Congress and The White House. One they are there, you have a "chance" to be considered by them, because you will be the folks that brung 'em. Without the more liberal party in both of those branches, you just lose on every issue (again and again and again)."
This remark shows us how the mind of the brainwashed Democrat works. Dan simply ignores the fact Democrats were elected in 2006, and didn't so much as lift a finger to rectify any of the problems Hedges talked about. In fact, the Democrats didn't even talk about these problems -- the subjects are "off the table," as Pelosi might say. In Dan's language, the Democrats had no problem "ignoring the folks what brung 'em in 2006," continuing their pattern of the last 40+ years. Dan simply ignores the fact that Hedges specifically says in the beginning of the 2nd paragraph "I single out no party. The Democratic Party has been as guilty as the Republicans. Dan simply ignores the fact that Obama is not discussing any of the real issues Hedges discusses -- the principle one being the title, "The Corporate State and the Subversion of Democracy." You could listen to every one of Obama's speeches without even hearing a reference to that concept. Obama hasn't said a single critical word about the military-industrial complex or the dangers of the national security state -- the very things described so powerfully in the article's citation from Sen Frank Church.
I agree - this puts it all out there in one place. I printed the whole thing so I can share it with my family. It'll make a lot more sense to them than my telling does.
Someone ahead of me said it right - we need to get a Democratic President elected, and a bunch more Democrats in Congress - and if the repugs start jamming the works, shut them out like they did the dems.
Then we need to take those "socialist" programs back and restore them to what they were meant to be. And get all those corporate slaves unionized!
"Granite Shadow is yet another new Top Secret and compartmented operation related to the military's extra-legal powers regarding weapons of mass destruction. It allows for emergency military operations in the United States without civilian supervision or control."
Halliburton "special program" detention centers, NYPD now armed with MP5 machine guns (650 rounds-per-second,) local cops buying "surplus" military weapons and tech by the boatload, all kinds of new laws and "secret" laws in place, the crazies on the "right" openly calling for the rounding up and/or execution of "liberals" or "liberal haters" or anyone else who doesn't say Bush three times per paragraph...
Folks, the sky she is a-fallin already. Arm yourselves, train for survival, and get ready to go to the mattresses...
Well written, but wrong missing its own point. Any candidate featured in mainstream media is an integeral part of the problem, and will do nothing to change the status quo. Those are the rules for membership in the Uncle Buck Party, of which most of D.C. belongs to. McKinney, Nader and some others excluded. The reality is that our Congress doesn't listen to us anymore. They don't listen anymore because it doesn't matter what we think anymore. They don't have to care because we don't pay their bills. That is now being done by corporate America. They aren't afraid of the voters as much as they are afraid of offending corporate sponsors. Uncle Buck runs a tight party and uses his PR Department to keep law and order. Nobody gets into the national spotlight that would pose a threat to the established order. Don't expect change from the current candidates, no matter what they say. They all work for Wall Street.
Hoa binh
The only Constitutional Amendment that could make a difference is a one term limit for legislators - make those corporations buy new loyalists constantly. If even the ACLU says campaign contribution limits are anti-free speech, forget that one.
Best speech ever - even sent it to my mom.
Corporate America got an "easy" pass the minute FDR signed the OBSCENE tax increase on Cannabis later followed by outlawing it. If Obama is willing to put up a strong fight to get rid of the ban on Cannabis completely, then he's got my vote even if he does have a hell of a long ways to go. PEACE !
I simply want to reduce each and every corporation to the size where I can drag it into the bathroom and drown it in my bathtub.
mrraven, I have no illusions about things improving dramatically. I do think that Obama would provide better direction for this country than McCain, but this is simply my best guess. McCain would be more of the same as we have now. I'm aware of what Bill Clinton did during his presidency. Obama isn't a Clinton. I personally think Obama would be closer to a Roosevelt as president than a Clinton. But if I'm dreaming, so be it. I still like hopeful dreams.
There are many jumping off points in discussing this article. For brevity's sake, I like to address just a couple points.
The era of Industrial capitalism is ending and is being replaced with electronics. Labor is being replaced with robotics. All of the reforms that the capitalists were willing to give up under the industrial era, when they needed to exploit labor, are coming to an end.
This objective fact is not clear, therefor workers, even the destitute, still accept leaders who claim to represent their interests, but who, in reality, defend and expand capitalist corporate interests and power, the goal of which is to preserve capitalist corporate private property.
In this country, nothing can move forward for our class until a broad section of Americans see their interests as different from, and diametrically opposed to, those of their corporate capitalist rulers, and act on that basis.
Well done! As you point out, the people need to some how rise up and take more control back, but there's a real problem. We have the rise of the military-corporate-congressional complex that is taking over (along with the complete control of information dissemination by their media lackeys) and starving us domestically and socially but has the jobs that people need in order to eat and live however distasteful the jobs may be morally. Local opportunities and family businesses are disappearing, but people still need to eat and live and will take the jobs that are available if they can - survival! Asking a large majority who are already very likely angry or depressed about it all to have courage and actively support the destruction of their only remaining means of providing for themselves and their families is a tall order. That will take inspirational leadership that will be able to break through the fear and mistrust of everyone and everything around, that has been steadily instilled in people for decades preventing us from naturally working together to solve issues to mutual benefit. Electing another figure head who is still part and parcel of the complex and says soothing things to keep the masses calm, is not going to give us that leadership or change a thing. We rarely see true leaders running for office because they either are "ruled out" by media very early on because their ideas are threatening to the status quo or they're too smart to run for office in the first place. Let's hope that Obama and a democratic majority can start us on a path back to the America we used to appreciate and, as mountaineer says if we can't pressure them to do that, it may be doo doo, but we do have to try.
I stored this article in the 'favorites' folder of my web browser. He manages to mention and back-up with statistics just about every concern I ever had with the path America has been taking my entire adult life. The easy solution, for now, is to vote Dem, as 'mountaineer' says.
My personal opinion, somewhat uninformed, is that you can't stop change, only slow it. Thus, borderless markets cannot be stopped, only managed somewhat to keep the affected American workers from falling off a cliff. I also think the solution to big business isn't big labor, its small business. That means less focus on labor unions and more focus on legislation preventing corporations from getting too big. Indeed, any corporation that capitalized out at more than 250 million U.S. dollars (or that hired more than 2000 employees) I'd have legislation to cut in half. Doing so doesn't reduce the labor demanded by the business, it doubles the number of corporate managements competing to serve that business. In essence, twice as many managers competing to attract the same labor pool = win/win for labor. An ununionized laborer who quits a job at a huge company finds there's little competition for his/her skills. By splitting up companies, laborers have more companies to choose from, and management will become more accomodating to labor in recognition of this shift.
Mostly, I'm Dem cuz I think the rich should be taxed more like they were between 1930-1970: when this country became truly great. Chris Hedges statistics about the division of wealth is truly sobering. Monopolistic wealth control = monopolistic political and media control = death of democracy AND capitalism. Monopolistic wealth control is almost as bad as communism.
of course, we could resort to what our founding fathers felt was needed....revolution...it may be necessary.
.
I'll say it again…
We needed Ralph Nader as President in 2000.
We needed Ralph Nader as President in 2004.
We NEED Ralph Nader as President in 2008.
Never before as we do now
http://www.votenader.org/index.html
.
"So what do we do?, Chris asks. Vote? Yes, but voting is not enough. We must "lobby, organize and advocate"...he says.
Great idea. But be sure you are not "lobbying, organizing and advocating" against a Republican government. Because if you are, you might as well be shouting at the stones on Mount Rushmore. Your voices won't change them at all (they're granite).
Your first (and only) "organizing" that's going to matter at all and will enable (or not) everything else you try to do is to get your country organized enough to elect Democrats to your Congress and The White House. One they are there, you have a "chance" to be considered by them, because you will be the folks that brung 'em. Without the more liberal party in both of those branches, you just lose on every issue (again and again and again).
Okay, you can lynch me again, now. But I'm right on this.
G3n3ral Stryck
"We are one, maybe two terrorists attacks away from a police state". Yes, and the neocons can hardly wait. It may not be a good idea to remind them of this.
Wow, great article and comments. The US empire needs to be broken up. I'm hoping Vermont takes the lead and secedes.
Mountaineer notice he said a lot of this started during the Clinton error. Obama equals more of the same of Clinton error if not worse. Now I may end up voting for him but certainly not under the delusion things will widely get better but rather to prevent McInsane from nuking Iran.