Get News & Views Updates
Most Popular This Week
- A Culture That Condones The Killing Of Children And Teaches Children To Kill
- Slaughter in Connecticut: 20 Children, 6 Adults Dead in Kindergarten Massacre
- How the Mighty (Mississippi) Has Fallen: Historic Drought Plagues US
- 'I'd Rather Fight Like Hell': Naomi Klein's Fierce New Resolve to Fight for Climate Justice
- Study: World's Mighty Giants Dying off at Alarming Rate
- A Culture That Condones The Killing Of Children And Teaches Children To Kill
- 'I'd Rather Fight Like Hell': Naomi Klein's Fierce New Resolve to Fight for Climate Justice
- Save the Children: Tears and Tragedy in Connecticut
- Thinking the Unthinkable: On Mental Health, My Son, and Gun Violence
- Remember All the Children, Mr. President
Popular content
Today's Top News
34 Convicted in Display At US Supreme Court
Thirty-four people were convicted yesterday of misdemeanor charges stemming from a demonstration at the Supreme Court in January in which they decried conditions at the U.S. military prison at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba.
D.C. Superior Court Judge Wendell P. Gardner Jr. said the demonstrators violated the law by protesting at the plaza of the Supreme Court, where such activities are banned. He rejected arguments that they were practicing free speech when they marched to the plaza, despite warnings from police, carrying banners and wearing T-shirts saying "Shut down Guantanamo."
The demonstration occurred Jan. 11, the sixth anniversary of the opening of the detention facility, which was set up to house terrorism suspects. During a three-day trial, prosecutors presented a videotape that showed several officers warning the protesters to remain on the sidewalk, where demonstrations are legal, or risk arrest.
During the trial, many of the 21 men and 13 women wore orange jumpsuits to show solidarity with Guantanamo detainees. When the defendants spoke, they gave their name and then the name, age and a brief biography of someone they described as a Guantanamo detainee. Many wore a tag bearing the name of a detainee.
As Gardner began explaining his ruling, one of the defendants, Paul Magno of the District, stood up and turned away from the judge. Gardner ordered a marshal to arrest Magno for contempt of court. Magno was escorted out, but not before shouting to the judge: "You have committed a crime against justice."
The judge ordered all defendants to return to court today for sentencing. Each faces up to 60 days in jail. Gardner said most will probably get probation. Those who had prior convictions, mostly for civil disobedience or disturbing the peace, could be jailed, Gardner said, to stop them from doing "the same thing over and over."
Because the charges were misdemeanors punishable by less than six months in jail, the case was heard by a judge instead of a jury.
After the decision, several defendants said they weren't surprised by the ruling but were pleased that they could voice their concerns about Guantanamo in court.
"We're sad about the convictions, but we're happy, moved and humbled to bring the stories, names and identification of the men in Guantanamo into a court of law," said Frida Berrigan, 34, of Brooklyn. She is the daughter of the late Philip Berrigan, a former Roman Catholic priest who was a major figure in the American peace movement during the Vietnam War.
The protesters are part of a group called Witness Against Torture, which has held demonstrations across the country condemning the prison. Members range in age from 19 to their early 70s.
The defendants represented themselves at trial, and their closing arguments drew emotional responses from each other and from supporters in the courtroom. Several wiped away tears as two defendants spoke on behalf of the group, citing the actions of Martin Luther King Jr. and others.
Earlier in the trial, the judge had dismissed charges against a 35th defendant because he said he had not been conclusively identified by police in a review of the videotape.
Before Gardner issued his ruling yesterday, one of the defendants stood and asked for a moment of silence for the detainees. Assistant U.S. Attorney Magdalena Acevedo quickly jumped to her feet to object.
"Your honor, this is a court of law. And no matter what we may think of their personal beliefs, it does not justify them violating the law," Acevedo said.
© 2008 The Washington Post
Comments
Note: Disqus 2012 is best viewed on an up to date browser. Click here for information. Instructions for how to sign up to comment can be viewed here. Our Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines. Note to Readers: Spam Filter May Capture Legitimate Comments...

45 Comments so far
Show Allhomeward-angel,
Thank you for your apology. I know it can be hard to keep your cool when your passion for a belief is strong. But you and Munkee Chunkz do have one point in common "On the issue they're protesting, they have my unconditional support."
You may not like everything Munkee has to say but it's more productive to discuss the mutual beliefs between the two of you to understand where and why you differ on the rest. (Now if George Bush could do the same with Iran...But I don't think either side is going to say "I'm sorry")
Peace.
We have (at least in MA) laws creating a 35-foot buffer zone around abortion clinics, in which no protests are allowed. We have laws banning protests within a certain radius of funerals, preventing Rev. Fred Phelps and his crew of bigots from disrupting grieving families, among other things. Are these laws also unconstitutional abridgements of the right to free speech?
The logic behind these laws is that it is in the interests of our society that a woman can get an abortion if necessary, or that mourners can honor a dead friend or family member. Allowing rallies or protests would compromise their abilities to do this - and these rights are so important, and protests would be so disruptive, that it's reasonable to create a buffer zone where protests are not allowed, so that these institutions can carry out their functions. It's not that protests are BANNED, it's just that they have to stay a certain distance away.
(to finish what I was saying above - got logged out)
The same idea applies to the Supreme Court. The SCOTUS is supposed to be the model of a fair, impartial judiciary. It fucking well ISN'T, but the law is made with the assumption that it is - and that the role that it plays in our society is so important that it should be able to conduct its work without interruption from protesters. Since the SCOTUS is not supposed to be influenced by political opinion (again, not true, but this is the assumption of the law), it would be directly contrary to its mission to allow political protests there. So protests ARE allowed, but they have to stay on the sidewalk. The idea is to create a reasonable limit on free speech that allows protests to take place, but also protects the right of the court to do what it needs to do. Replace "Supreme Court" with "abortion clinic" in this article and see if you still disagree with the law.
And there are plenty of other places in D.C. where laws about protesting are far more lenient. It's very, very easy to protests at Congress or the White House; anyone can camp out, and plenty of people do with no challenge. If one is an anti-torture activist, it makes more sense to be at Congress than at the Supreme Court anyway, since SCOTUS can't do anything unless someone appeals a case to them.
So I COMPLETELY sympathize with the protesters - I think they're doing a great thing. But I also understand the constitutionality of the law under which they were convicted. And they WERE warned repeatedly; they knew they ran the risk of arrest.
We-The-People have lost the:
Ballot Box, Jury Box and now the Soap Box.
Alas, all we have left is the Cartridge Box.
Well, at least they got their chance to speak out in a judicial forum and gained some public attention for their worthy cause. Frankly, I'm somewhat surprised that the judge allowed that much latitude when he might easily have ruled many of their statements irrelevant and inadmissible.
"Those who had prior convictions, mostly for civil disobedience or disturbing the peace, could be jailed, Gardner said, to stop them from doing "the same thing over and over."
what would that be, mr. gardner?
exercising their rights?
speaking of preventing people from doing the same thing over and over...
bush plans to invade yet another country for no reason by august.
what do you plan to do about THAT?!?
To overkill:
You made me chuckle, although what you say is both sad and true.
These kinds of cases were once routinely dismissed; the arrest was just a means of shutting you up and stifling protest. Hell, such demonstrations do not even warrant arrest.
The slippery slope: from the freedom to assemble and petition the government with our grievances to requiring us to apply for permits and having to "get clearance" just to get into the Capitol to the creation of "free speech zones" that are fenced-in enclosures (I thought the entire country was a "free speech zone") to being arrested and jailed for assembling to petition the government. We're well on our way, folks. Is there anyone who does not see concentration camps in the very near future?
"Is ther anyone who does not see concentration camps in the very new future? Well kgary, the US is loaded with concentration camps just waiting to be filled. Overkill is correct; we live in dangerous times:
http://www.libertyforlife.com/jail-police/us_concentration_camps.htm
The Justices seem to be under the mistaken impression that the Supreme court is their own personal property - these malignant jerks are in no way upholding the constitution - IMPEACH and start over with reasonably honest men who aren't beholden to death cults as these monsters appear to be - pass laws that make misuse of power an automatic immediate removal of office and imprisonment for life in one of their oh so cute torture camps
Badge of honor to be sentenced by a corrupt system of justice filled with partisan judges, political hacks, and regressive activists. What else can one do when the law is wrong? I hope they wear their convictions with pride!!!!!
Anyone here know where these courageous men will be incarcerated so we can write them a letter of thanks?
Because the charges were misdemeanors punishable by less than six months in jail, the case was heard by a judge instead of a jury.
can anybody tell me since when are you not permitted a trial by jury if the max sentence is under 6 months? the only reason they changed that is because they know that people wouldn't be so willing to plea guilty on little shit charges if they knew they would have a fair chance in front of a jury of their peers. Who in their right mind (other than corrupt judges towing the Parties line) would have voted for a guilty verdict?
The US injustice system is sick sick sick. I wish people in the US could wake up to whats really going on, but wait, AMERICAN IDOL IS ON WOW!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!DID YOU HEAR THAT BRITTANY SPEARS IS GOING TO HAVE ANOTHER BABY? AMAZING! AND THAT OTHER ACTRESS JUST GOT A DUI LAST NIGHT, CAN YOU BELIEVE IT? everytime i hear these so called 'news' reports i really want to stick my finger down my throat. How can progressives compete against 24/7 propaganda from these entrenched interests?
Can we go back to hanging judges? LOL
Sounds like the prosecutrix farted to me.
Judge Roy Bean lives !!!!!
Criminals!!!
I mean the justice system, our government, including the "opposition" party for letting this come this far.
"Paul Magno of the District, stood up and turned away from the judge. Gardner ordered a marshal to arrest Magno for contempt of court."
But Bolten, Miers and Rove ignore Congressional subpoenas (which require one to show up even if he/she plans to invoke the 5th Amendment) and they're still walking around free earning millions.
Sounds like D.C. Superior Court Judge Wendell P. Gardner Jr. has successfully completed his audition for Supreme Court Justice...
Can we just say no to these bast.... can we? People of the US say no; no more! no more bullshit.... can we?
God I wish....
You have no 'habeus corpus'.
Your constitution has been rendered useless.
Your elections are nothing more that periodic micromanaged, carefully crafted PR stage shows that give you the illusion that the US is a functioning democracy. Nothing could be further from the truth.
Free speech, freedom of association, freedom of the press, free movement, freedom from unwarranted search and seizure... all gone.
Just admit to yourself that you are living in a fascist dictatorship police state.
Take a deep breath.
And decide whether you would rather die on your feet or live on your knees.
The protesters were warned before arrests were made. They were allowed to protest as long as they adhered to the demands of the law, by staying on the sidewalk. They, like some of the prisoners in Guantanamo, took it upon themselves to break the law and should suffer the consequences.
I have no sympathy for them.
On the issue they're protesting, they have my unconditional support.
The law is the law and laws can be changed in a legal way. Going against the law when there were options in place was childish contempt of our system.
-marc
Rather than get all worked up about the comment just above, please allow the following report:
Of the convicted thirty-four, four are from Iowa, and good friends of mine, they are:
Kirk Brown 24 Des Moines Catholic Worker and reincarnation of Thomas Acquinas.
Christine Gaunt 49 librarian and farmer with the bravest family in the world.
Ed Bloomer 60 Des Moines Catholic Worker and career saint.
Brian Terrel 52 Maloy Catholic Worker and farmer and a man who has more arrest and jail stories (over his peace activism) than the US has armed nuclear warheads.
Okay. That was good, huh. I kept my composure. But...
Um, civil disobedience is usually breaking the law.
just WHOM do those court house steps belong to anyway? Is it not WE THE PEOPLE?
Namaste
Hey tommy schmitz : Good self-restraint . I wonder if the cretin munkee_chunkz has a mother , a sister , an aunt , a grannie , a girl-friend ....or maybe mc is a woman too . If he/she knew any American History he/she would remember that Susan B. Anthony appealed LEGALLY to the White House , Congress and the Supreme Court over a period of fifty years without success for the Women's Voting Rights. Undaunted the women turned to illegal assemblies and protests for which they were jailed.
With munkee's convoluted reasoning he would have had " no sympathy " for the incarceration of Susan B. Anthony and her collegues .
Back to munkee's lady-friends/relatives , I wonder , can they legally vote ? Of course they can because suffragettes went to jail in protest and finally Congress ,
White House and Supreme court changed the law to allow women to vote .
Now munkee , just so you don't think Susan B. Anthony was a maverick , a loose cannon , a voice crying in the wilderness " google " the penchant for law-breaking and its positive results from lesser champions like Nelson Mandela , Mohandas Gandhi , MLK , William Wilberforce , Dietrich Bonhoeffer , Harriet Tubman ...
I'm not even going to explain in detail their individual accomplishments . If don't see a connection between the above mentioned campaigners and the thirty-four arrested protesters and your mother's right to vote then you counldn't have chosen a more fitting poster-name .
They think by repressing decent that somehow that will uphold the ideal of following the law. But , when the law is filled with injustice it is every citizens responsibility to say hell no. Justice trumps the immoral script meant to hold down decent. They should enter a not guilty plea, based on their right to assemble and petition their government for redress of their grievances.
tell us moore about the great land of the free..boy from down under ..gee it must be great to live a free demacratic country..
Maybe this is a really naive question, but I'm just wondering how a law saying citizens can't protest on the Supreme Court steps can be constitutional? I mean, I've been away a long time, but that's not the way I remember the Bill of Rights...
munkee_chunkz, you troll, go f off somewhere else, you repuke troll, you are not welcome here. in fact, you should look around you. what do you see? america as a country is lost. you and your kind has laid it all to waste... go spit your bs somewhere else; unless you have a reasonable point..
since when do people in the good ol us of a have to apply for a permit to voice their oppionions? since when to people have apply for a "grant" that allows them to say ""enough is enough" with the bullshit ...
munkee, if i had i gun, i would shoot you in the face, and that my enemy is what i coal true patriout ism.
munkee, u r a ps o f s h i t. b u rn i n he ll. f or ev er.
.
http://www.libertyforlife.com/jail-police/us-concentration_camp-locations.htm
Where do you live?
.
I believe many are missing the point of the protest. It seems to me, they wanted to get arrested to have their moment in court over the Guantanamo injustice/fiasco. They knew the possibilities and were willing to take the chance of conviction. Are any of them complaining? This is simply the cost of regaining freedom. If the rest of us were this courageous, we might have a chance of reclaiming OUR rights and OUR country, not relying on some politico to save us.
homeward-angel,
munkee_chunkz posts a reasonable comment and you send him death threats?
He is not welcome here?
You spout obscenities?
If I were you, I would apologize to everyone here for your uncultured behavior!
(and if I could find a digital bar of soap I would wash your cyber-mouth with it.)
Willybill is right. These patriotic Americans are trying to save our country which, according to all the opinion poles, wants to be put on a different track. They are doing exactly what a true American should be doing. Defending the Constitution against all enemies. Something our government stopped doing when they got into bed with corporate America and gave birth to fascism. With the Magna Carta and habeas corpus now just a chapter in our history books, and our Constitution being used to prop up a declining empire, these patriots at the Supreme Court should be listened to and honored. Shooting the messenger is one way of thought control in our criminal society.
Hoa binh
Shakespeare exposed the follies of war centuries ago. I love the line, "Fair is foul and foul is fair." In our nation to love war, even on false cause makes you a "patriot" these days. The peace lover is seen as "the enemy." Alcohol, guns, violent driving (road rage) are all permitted, but POT, the peace pipe, makes one worthy of incarceration. What passes for "entertainment" is the soft propaganda equivalent of the Roman Arena massaging the egos of viewers so that there's not much difference between violence in fictional arenas from those in the "theater of war."
In times like these, being OUT of step defines the decided moral/spiritual HIGH ground. I am glad some still own the courage to act on the moral outrage that IS festering like a slow moving magma beneath the nation's surface, a volcano that will one way or another burst.
We must show each other our solidarity every day. We want Cheney and Bush impeached, and we want to GET OUT OF IRAQ. One way to demonstrate our will every day is to take a Sharpie magic marker and write on several dollar bills: "LIAR BUSH MURDERS FOR OIL". Slip as many of these as you dare into circulation. Our leaders must feel the groundswell if there is any hope that they will act on our behalf. Daily postings of Xerox's are good too--at one's workplace, church, club, etc. Also even public restrooms are good places to employ magic markers. Desperate times call for desperate measures.
Well, so much for the freedom of assembly. Not that we have had it in the past few decades anyway.
roncypert,
They were allowed to assemble and protest. The issue was (see Calvinball posting).
Their mission was, it seems, to have their say in the courtroom about Gitmo. They accomplished it. Freedom of assembly is still with us in this country. (Or did someone pull the plug on this site yet and I didn't notice.)
imfedup May 31st, 2008 4:23 pm
I agree. Lets not have this kind of talk.
My problem is, I also agree with....
munkee_chunkz May 30th, 2008 9:04 pm
and
tommy schmitz May 30th, 2008 9:47 pm
and
calvinball May 31st, 2008 10:53 am
and
imfedup May 31st, 2008 6:21 pm
and
willybill May 31st, 2008 2:40 pm
A CharlestonPeace.net video of the January 2007 arrest of 9 on the Supreme Court steps. Edited to BlowBack's (http://blowback.org/) No Nos Noveran. Video is at:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ycIY1SI1DIc
.
http://www.libertyforlife.com/jail-police/us-concentration_camp-locations.htm
Where do you live?
44 States listed...
.
Thank You...
imfedup-u r right, sorry for that post, it was obsene, and unnecessary, BUT i am just sick of right wing trolls invading sites like these with their excuses on how this government has faltered, and taken away the rights of its citizens. Munkee's comment really pushed my button, and my post was a overreaction to it. THIS DOESN'T IN ANY WAY MEAN THAT HIS COMMENT HAS ANY VALIDITY, IN FACT IT STILL PUSHES MY BUTTON WHEN I SCROLL UP AND LOOK AT THE DUMBASSEDNESS OF THAT COMMENT.
"The protesters were warned before arrests were made. They were allowed to protest as long as they adhered to the demands of the law, by staying on the sidewalk. They, like some of the prisoners in Guantanamo, took it upon themselves to break the law and should suffer the consequences.
I have no sympathy for them."
take this Rush Limbaugh rhetoric to MoveOn, you might get a better reception there MunkeeChunk...
In Nevada in the late 1980s, perhaps 3000 people might show up, hundreds "crossing the line", dozens on desert bikes, to be detained in Wackenhut holding pens. Ever hear of this...
One organizer (after tens of thousands of people protested near Mercury Test Range many times a year for over two decades) expressed his frustrations with the networks by breaking Ronny Reagan's fresh award at the Las Vegas annual NBA ceremony OVER THE PODIUM IN HIS FACE, the award was a large glass eagle. To avoid making the evening news, the rude invader was not executed on the spot.
I watched 3-400 people march a mile, block the 6 lane main boulevard in front of Occidental Petroleum headquarters in 1999, protesting the loss of Natives' land and the destruction of the Ouia culture in Columbia; 15 kids locked themselves into steel tubes across Wilshire all afternoon on a Friday and were cut out one-by-one and hauled away by fifty Cops, a dozen mounted on LAPD horseback. NOT ONE WORD on the 6 local TV stations, traffic jams for hours on end.
Over 12,000 Quakers (like Susan B.) were jailed in England in the 1660s securing the right to pray OUTSIDE a church, securing jury nullification and freedom not to swear to the State. With the population at 5,000,000, that would be like 700,000 in the US today. We have over three times that many in jail now.
Why do you live so far from your work, why do you work so far from your life and wife...because Franciscan Father Serra colonized you with the turnstile and "zoning" laws, to double your workday and take your work away from you & change and restrict your diet, saving the best for Himself. "Black market" "scofflaws" and "homeless" are rounded up and drugged by the thousands everywhere in your "America" ... you are 60 days from moving in with the winos on 5th street, your celler has not a day of food for you and the ones you care for, everything that would help a neighbor fix a screen door, stop a leak or drill a shelf bracket hole is at "Home depot" now, we sold this country out for metal scrap since "junk" went from $35 a ton to almost $200 a ton. Possession is criminal, "old tools" and "junk" are out of fashion and may conflict with "City Code Enforcement".
You are spending two thirds of your money paying for a house that's been paid for ten times while you drive to and from the place you shuffle papers all day, The Boss picks who your friends are...."Lions Eat The Christians" on TV every night and you won't yet protest.....BUT, if they lie to me ONCE more, kill one more innocent in my name...
Sorry, you missed it. "They" murdered one million people in Tokyo on the morning of March 10th, 1945....
Odds are good we will ALWAYS "miss it". Thats why change doesn't wait for a sign. Change comes from within the silence.
As usual, "justice" comes out of the barrel of a gun. Used to be a sword, but, modern times, you know.
The only way to really get rid of torturers-that no one seems interested in actually prosecuting-is to turn their lives into a 3-ring circus.
Take John Yoo for example; every time he teaches a class at Berkeley, students should be so loud-so disruptive that having him there-as a tenured professor- will become a detriment to the college itself.
Yes, it will interfere with the ability of other students to learn (I guess morals can be uncomfortable) but that is the whole point.
When Yoo's very presence becomes so disruptive to the college itself-Berkeley will have no choice but to release him from tenure. It's not prosecution-which I'd love to see-but at least it's something.