Al Sadr: Let Iraqis Decide On US Troops
BAGHDAD, Iraq - An agreement between the United States and Iraq to allow U.S. troops to remain operating in Iraq past 2008 should be put to a popular referendum, Shiite cleric Muqtada al-Sadr urged in an online message to his followers.
The message also calls for weekly protests against the agreement, being negotiated by the two governments.
Al-Sadr also called for "an organized media action" and "a unified political and parliamentary movement" to oppose the standards of forces agreement, which would replace the U.N. resolution that allows U.S. troops to operate in Iraq when it expires at the end of the year.
Al-Sadr's Mehdi Army militia has frequently clashed with Iraqi and U.S. forces, most recently in Sadr City, a Baghdad neighborhood considered a Sadrist stronghold.
In the statement posted on a loyalist Web site, the popular cleric renewed his call for a timetable for the departure of U.S. troops and called for delegations to approach the United Nations, the European Union, the Arab League and other Iraq neighbors to discuss the agreement.
Protests against the agreement should be carried out after Friday prayers "until further notice or until the treaty is canceled," al-Sadr said.
If the government rejects his call for a referendum on the agreement, al-Sadr will order his offices "to work on collecting millions of signatures opposing" it, the message said.
The United States and Iraq began negotiating the agreement this year but have not publicly discussed its contents except in vague terms.
Last month, U.S. Ambassador to Iraq Ryan Crocker told the Senate Foreign Relations Committee that the agreement will cover the "basic authorizations and protections" to allow troops to continue operations but will not specify troop levels or establish permanent bases.
"We anticipate that it will expressly forswear them ... and it will not tie the hands of the next administration," he said.
In January, as the negotiations were about to begin, Defense Secretary Robert Gates called the agreement "an approach to normalizing the relationship between the United States and Iraq."
Senior Defense officials said in January that the agreement will spell out terms for the U.S. presence in Iraq after December 31, when the U.N. mandate expires.
"There will be a need to make sure our forces in Iraq have the tools they need to be able to do the job they need to," one official said. "Our forces need to be able to defend themselves."
Such tools also include the authority to detain terrorist suspects and keep the ones already detained in captivity, the officials said.
Some members of Congress have objected to the Bush administration's plans to handle the agreement without seeking congressional approval.
© 2008 CNN News
Twitter
StumbleUpon
Facebook
Delicious
Digg
Newsvine
Google
Yahoo
Technorati
6 Comments so far
Show AllMaybe before all is said and done Al-Sadr will teach us about democracy.
Maybe after he ascends to the official high leadership post he'll donate some Iraqi oil revenue to Mike Gravel's National Initiative, and we can start to build a democracy here at home.
Well there you have it. A treaty--negotiated in secrecy between the leaderships of two illegitimate governments-- that the people or their representatives will never be allowed to weigh in on. Democracy as brought to you through Blackwater.
Lets face facts people the American government has no intentions of pulling out, especially the Bush Family and any oil barons, so what else is new they are tryn every trick they have to prolong there stay. Referendum ya for who the controls of the oil to make them selfs happy and to give the appearance of caring. America has no right to be there and pushing there politics, and religion.
Philly
Well, this will never happen. It's the democratic thing to do. Therefore, the US will oppose it.
WTF - are you kidding? We can't even have a public referndum in the U.S.. Why would they allow one in Iraq?
I mean, really. After all, the U.S. is bestowing "American" democracy on Iraq at the point of a gun. And if democracy is defined in the American way, that means that the corrupt government has the right to shove ANYTHING down the throats of the citizens. That's the way American democracy works at home. And of course, Iraq has to follow that model. Paul Bremmer said so. And that is that.
Gee, a public referendum. Sounds like the democratic thing to do. Do you think the US occupational forces will allow it?