Is The World About To Be Running On Empty?
In France, fishermen are blockading oil refineries. In Britain, lorry drivers are planning a day of action. In the US, the car maker Ford is to cut production of gas-guzzling sports utility vehicles and airlines are jacking up ticket prices. Global concerns about fuel prices are reaching fever pitch and the world's leading energy monitor has issued a disturbing downward revision of the oil industry's ability to keep pace with soaring demand.
Yesterday's warning from the International Energy Agency sent the price of a barrel of oil to a new record for the 13th day in a row. The latest high - $135 for a barrel of light sweet crude - was reached in New York barely five months after the price hit $100. Experts in London and on Wall Street predict that prices will rise to $200, regardless of the protests of consumers and the complaints of politicians. It is simple economics, they say: supply and demand. The former is short, the latter growing.
Consumers are feeling the pinch in almost every area of their daily lives. The pain is felt most obviously at the pumps. In Britain, the price of petrol has risen to an average of 114p for a litre of unleaded - £5.15 per gallon. In the US, where drivers pay much lower prices, gasoline is more than $4 (£2) a gallon. Beyond that, energy bills are rising for households across the globe, hitting the poorest the hardest. British Gas, the nation's biggest gas and electricity supplier, is mulling further price rises, on top of the 15 per cent average increase it introduced in January.
Airlines which once limited fare increases to temporary "fuel surcharges" are now raising ticket prices and - as American Airlines did this week - starting to charge for checked baggage. Meanwhile, manufacturers are putting up the price of goods to compensate for higher energy bills at their factorues, ending many years of price deflation that began when firms started transferring production overseas.
"The high-priced energy environment is being driven by the fact that demand has outstripped supply," President George Bush's Energy Secretary, Samuel Bodman, told the US Congress yesterday. "We have sopped up all the available spare oil production capacity in the system ... and there is no silver bullet that will immediately solve our energy challenges or drastically reduce costs at the gas pump."
The world uses about 87 million barrels of oil a day, about a quarter of it in the US. Saudi Arabia is the only country thought to have the capacity to pump oil faster. Meanwhile, China is in the throes of an industrial revolution that demands ever greater supplies of crude, yet global production has stagnated for two years. The Saudi government rejected a recent appeal from Mr Bush to increase production, saying there were no oil shortages at present. Economists worry, though, that shortages are around the corner, as mature oilfields wind down.
The Paris-based International Energy Agency (IEA) said yesterday that it might have overestimated the capacity of oil-producing nations to open new fields to keep up with growing demand over the next decade. Global production, which the IEA previously reckoned could reach 116 million barrels a day by 2030, might not even make 100 million.
Fatih Birol, the IEA's chief economist, said the oil industry had entered "a new energy world order" where it was harder to keep supply and demand in equilibrium. "When the price went up as a result of the Iranian revolution, demand went down," he added. "But what has happened in the last few years has not been in line with economic theory. The price of oil went up sharply between 2004 and 2006 and demand actually increased. That may seem bizarre but it is the result of new buyers coming in, such as China and the Middle Eastern economies where fuel is subsidised by government and rises are not reflected on the consumer side."
Some politicians in the US rail against nationalised oil companies in the developing world for failing to invest in new production that might alleviate stresses in the market. And at every turn, Mr Bush and members of his administration insist that environmentalists should yield to the public hunger for oil and Congress should authorise drilling in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge in Alaska.
However, the investment bank Goldman Sachs said this month that the oil price could rise as high as $200 over the next year and would remain consistently above $100 until there was a significant fall in US demand. There are small signs of that happening. Yesterday, Ford said it was cutting vehicle production by more than it announced earlier this year. It will make the deepest cuts in its SUV and pick-up truck businesses because US customers are increasingly switching to lighter, more fuel-efficient vehicles. Alan Mulally, the chief executive, said pick-up sales now accounted for 9 per cent of the market compared with 11 per cent a few weeks ago.
© 2008 The Independent
Delicious
Digg
StumbleUpon
Newsvine
Facebook
Google
Yahoo
Technorati
59 Comments so far
Show AllRight now we use 80 million barrels a day???
Do the math...that is 29 Billion barrels a year.
Look at the chart...that is enough to drain all of Russia's large deposit in one year (I know the rate of production could not support this...but it is a useful image just the same.) Like a giant straw slowly moving over the planet sucking up at a hideous rate.
I also love the propoganda of things like "massive new oil find" which turns out to be a few hundred million barrels - that sounds like a lot to a layman, but considering our usage it is like finding a quart of gas to keep your Suburban running.
Anyway, we all know that production rate is the bigger issue. At current rates of production, we will not run completely out of oil for 100 years...
But what good does that do us if our production rate drops to less than half of demand within 25 years?
Repent for the end is near.
(Or take your life in your own hands and "prepare")
Maple Fudge:
I have to cross RR tracks 2 times a day and one or two times a week get stopped. There is a sign beside the road that says turn off your engine and save gas. I also heard if you put your car in neutral it helps some since the engine doesn't have to work as hard. Anytime I am stuck in traffic I will shut it down. There is no reason we can't buy a hybrid that the electric engine runs up to 50 MPH and save a ton on gas in the city.
It is strange that we just don't know how much oil there is out there. It's like we're all driving without a gas gauge way out into the desert and just hoping we make it.
I had to drive the other day. There was no way around it. I got out on the highway, my head full of Global Warming and Peak Oil and guilt. I picked up a hitch hiker for the karma, a guy who can no longer afford to drive. We counted the cars with single passengers - almost all of them.
It should be a shameful socially unacceptable thing to drive for pleasure, or to drive to destinations within bicycle distance or to idle your car for half an hour while you wait to pick up the kids. I notice that the Prius shuts it's engine off when you stop moving. Why can't a regular car do that?
This problem SHOULD have been taken care of in the 70's. As long as you have BIG GOVERNMENT in everyone's business nothing will be solved and WE THE PEOPLE have to deal with all the CRAP.
Maybe but it is the daily commute or just driving Timmy to his soccer pratice that sucks up the fuel the most. Not eveyone lives in the city and the wave of people who moved out of the city for the last 20 or 30 years have to use the family car. Trains maybe help with people who live out of town but will make no difference for the rest. Electric or as others have said AIR Car
RAIL.
Remember the United States, home of the greatest Railroad System in the world?
Intra-urban, Inter-urban, Transcontinental, freight, passenger, business or pleasure.
Rail did it all, and it can do it again.
Gonna be a helluva rebuild job, though.
I wonder if such a job putting a lot of people to good, useful work could help the economy?
Have Fun,
-matti.
KEM
thanks for the insight on gas pricing 101
Israel wants to put a blockade to block the oil getting out of IRAN by tanker. And guess what the price jumps so Iran in a way makes the same profits on selling less oil. People forget what Putin said a short time ago. An attack on IRAN is an attack on Russia.
PaulMagillSmith, I saw the documentary "Who Killed The electric Car".
If it will happens again, and Oil companies will try to suppress alternatives energy sources for our cars, it will be up for the Indians and the Chinese to save the planet, and we - will be left behind.
ThadStone May 24th, 2008 1:48 am
Your comment is awaiting moderation.
Don't bother.
If you take a few days to 'moderate', the thread will be over anyway.
Glad to see you no longer need donations. Someone hit MegaMillions ?
Peak oil is real, but it seemed to get more coverage before the Iraq War too, as a more sophisticated, quieter argument for the war to rope in some of those who weren't the toothless morons who fell for the WMD, ties to 9/11 scam.
Thom Friedman even wrote a column that said if the Iraq War went well, oil could be as cheap as $6 a barrel and that the absolute worst case scenario it would kick up to $60. Pat Robertson of all people echoed this argument.
http://professorsmartass.blogspot.com/2006/03/bbcs-greg-palast-iraq-war-to-cap-oil.html
Undoubtedly, the same arguments will quietly be made about Iran, and just as in Iraq, the reality will be the oil companies will use access to choke output and keep prices high, just as they intended and did in Iraq, according to Oil & Gas Journal, oil company execs, and Bush himself:
http://professorsmartass.blogspot.com/2007/03/oil-too-cheap-if-no-iraq-war-says-oil.html
The THEORY of economics taught in college courses isn't how the oil companies bean counters do it.
Supply and demand works this way for them.
(1) If the supply goes up, the price of gas goes up.
(2) If the demand goes down, the price of gas goes up.
They like it that way and that's how they operate so we might as well get used to it.
who and I am having trouble with this who in the world knows to the drop how much oil is still in the ground? PEAK OIL is just another way to jack the price even more.
**************************
Profits don't mean a thing?? If that was the case then why is then 60% of the price of oil has NOTHING TO DO WITH SUPPLY AND DEMAND???
ChangeB42Late May 23rd, 2008 1:22 pm
You are dead-on accurate, ChangeB42Late. All the prattle from progressives and liberals about obscene oil co. profits are entirely beside the point. We could cut their company profits by 90% and it would not change the fundamental problem. As a nation we have indulged in an orgy of criminal imbecility when it comes to careless extravagant consumption of oil. There IS a supply problem. The days of cheap oil are over. Actually, from a thermal energy dynamic perspective, oil at $135/barrel is still incredibly CHEAP. The longer we wait to invest what remains of current oil in developing a more sustainable energy/transport/food production infrastructure, the harsher our collective future will be.
Our nation's schools, our corporate media have failed us. We are a nation of illiterates when it comes to the energy that our whole "American dream" depends on. People should avail themselves of websites like The Oil Drum and energybulletin.net to learn about this precious resource, petroleum, that we continue to squander day after day...
http://www.zcommunications.org/znet/viewArticle/17717
Oil platform in the North sea evacuated because of leak so I guess another jump in the price in the next 24 hours. pumps 150,000 barrels a day ( BBC story)
AIR CAR people remember I have mentioned it before. USES NO FUEL AT ALL BUT COMPRESSED AIR. Being run and tested in Europe
Mendo C:
in Canada we are paying 4.75 or 1.25$ a litre for a us size gallon. (3.8 litres) or 5.62 for a Canadian gallon (4.5 litres) right now. They said 150$ a barrel this summer and guess what they charge what they want. 6$ for US next year, I say before next year if they want McCain in they will have to do something
This is the most pleasing bunch of comments I think I've ever seen on this topic at CD. Most understand, but there's still some education needed for some. But compared to some of the comment threads I've read at CNN, CNBC, BBC, and Yahoo, you folks are stellar.
RE: Letto May 24th, 2008 3:24 am
"Other options are Electric, or pluggable hybrids (Which needs better battery technology)."
I suggest you see "Who Killed The electric Car", and find out how oil companies have bought the rights to the best battery technologies to prevent any incursion into their oil sales with much better non-oil burning vehicles.
We CAN do this, but it will mean kicking obstructionists out of the way legally or violently (their choice).
In the congressional energy hearings this past week it was readily evident the big oil companies were manipulating the market out of sheer greed. Their cohorts were/are the Wall Street speculators, who drive the price up by buying futures on margin, and never actually take delivery of any oil. A drop in the price at the pump could probably be realized immediately if oil futures could NOT be bought on margin, but required a 60-70% payment up front or even higher.
The oil execs admitted oil should be about $55-60 a barrel and agreed speculation accounted for about 40% of the price increase. They also said demand had dropped about 2% recently while prices have risen, a fact contrary to accepted theory of supply & demand. They were also taken to task for only investing only about $100 million in alternative fuels, while holding billions in cash, and only operating existing refineries at 81% which manipulates prices upward.
As a drastic paradigm shift serious consideration should be given to nationalizing both the auto & oil industries. After all, these are industries crucial to national security and surely a government with transparency, oversight, and regulation could do a better job for Americans than the unresponsive CEO's of these two vital industries have done.
When the five oil CEO's were asked how much their compensation was half of them couldn't (or wouldn't) answer. Do you think people who make so much they don't have a clue about how much they make (average over $30+ million for the top 15 oil CEO's BTW) care at all many Americans are breaking open their piggy-banks for fuel just to get to work?
As long as we keep funding the military with WHATEVER they demand, there will be no inspiration for them to really make fuel consumption a high priority. The US military is the biggest consumer of oil in the world, and some estimates have placed their consumption as high as 11% of total world production. What impact on oil price would there be if we got the hell out of Iraq? and why are we even paying to rebuild their infrastructure, when ours is in serious need, and they have a positive balance of trade surplus valued at over $40 billion because of windfall profits primarily from oil companies gouging US consumers?
If you have seen the film, "Who Killed The Electric Car?", you will easily understand why the auto industry should also be nationalized. Hydrogen vehicle technology, with a widespread delivery infrastructure, isn't expected until about 2020, but electric (or even compressed air) vehicles have already been built in numbers, distributed, and received rave customer reviews, but were recalled & destroyed by GM. This act alone makes a case for nationalization of auto production. Hitler took over auto design & manufacture of a people's car, AKA the Volkswagon, one of the best cars ever built, and got 30-35 mpg over 50 years ago. My music partner's father currently has a VW wagon, roomy, comfortable, safe, well built, with power enough for city or open road, AND it gets 57 MPG. Why can't we do this also?...well the truth is we CAN, but we must get greedy un-patriotic un-responsive government & corporate entities out of the picture first.
Conservation is a key area we must act on immediately. I know it would be wonderful, as a couple on this thread suggest would help, if many more people could commute by walking or biking. The reality is with huge distances to be covered even in a medium sized metropolitan area, with a lack of adequate public transport available, only those in the cores of cities have that option available.
With the advance from manufacturing, to service, to the present information economy millions of jobs could be made to only require a cyber-commute, which could have a similar effect in oil consumption reduction. With computers, cell phones, texting, fax machines, video conferencing, etc, the amount of people actually needing to commute to an office should be dramatically reduced. The dinosaurs of the old, everybody needs to show up in person so we can keep an eye on them, model must be retired or shoved out of the way. Output & production can be measured, rewarded, or penalized, but commuting in person to show off your suit & clean shaved face have nothing to do with productivity; it just wastes time, gas, and causes un-necessary pollution.
With the hidden $4 per gallon tax an un-necessarily bloated military imposes on us, the real price of a gallon is around $8, yet gas in Iraq currently sells for roughly 40 cents per gallon. What's wrong with this picture, America?
Lee Driver, this article is about Oil, not about electricity.
Electricity production cost is about 20% of Oil price derivatives (for the same amount of energy).
Electricity face no immediate crises (With the exception of global worming, which is not immediate), since we can make it from various resources such as coal, natural gas, oil, nuclear, hydroelectric, geothermal, solar, wind to name a few.
The coming crises is in transportation. Today cars, trucks, trains, planes and ships are running almost exclusively on Oil derivatives.
We must make our cars runs on something different than just expensive Oil.
One solution is Flex -Fuel (where you can chose between gas, ethanol and methanol) Other options are Electric, or pluggable hybrids (Which needs better battery technology) .
Grow food locally. Store food locally. Secure good water. Shut down city lights blaring into the night. Give up Nascar, sorry. Buy a couple solar panels and a battery so you can read to your kids at night, run a blender. Cut out crap. Ride your bike. Not because you have to, just for practice.
Some solutions:
Dr Robert Zubrin - Energy Victory Talk
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NLRuGUPkyh4
Another solution is pluggable hybrid.
Drive on electricity for the first 100 miles, and use gas only for long distance. There is no need to wait for the Volt. See this chines company:
http://www.byd.com/
Well if peak oil is the real Mccoy at least it will stop global warming in its tracks.
A world free of autos or abandoned autos is good for all us bike riders and slow walkers.
Why the oil corps are not investing in new refineries is a bit puzzling maybe cost maybe no future in oil.
Another article feeding into market hysteria. Gas is still cheap because we aren't over Hubbart's Peak yet.
If think what were paying right now is expensive, you're in for a very rude awakening in a couple years.
I just heard an economist on NPR recently saying that demand for oil hasn't peaked enough to warrant these sharp price hikes almost daily. So much of it's being driven by Wall Street speculators who are in the throes of creating another bubble to replace what they all lost in the bursting of the housing bubble. Sooner or later, it'll all burst, just like the dot-com and the housing bubbles did.
And when it does, there will be hell to pay.
Add to all of this the steadily weakening dollar that is also driving up oil prices. You can blame the outrageous trade deficits with places like India and China, where we've sent all of our jobs which has resulted in these very populous countries becoming rising industrial powers that need to consume massive amounts of oil to survive and you can see why prices go up so dramatically almost daily.
We've only our own rampant American greed to blame for all of this.
The question, are we at peak oil, is a little too complicated to answer with yes or no. The US oil production went into decline in the '70's. It would appear that the production of so-called "light, sweet crude" has been in decline for years. The production of that filthy energy-intensive crap they pull out of the tarsands is booming. Here's more: http://www.theoildrum.com/story/2005/8/23/233714/826
The supply of Oil is on a much less steep trajectory than the demand for the Dollar and Pound. Oil didn't double in any of the other currencies in just a year. Dollar and Pound... Coincidence?
If we have not yet reached peak oil in the sense that total production may yet rise a bit higher, still we have certainly reached it in the sense that demand is rising faster with no limit. The bidding war has begun and it isn't going to stop.
This is the most serious and immediate crisis facing the world today, because it will cause severe economic disruption, possibly a global depression, worsening of global politics and potential conflict between nuclear powers.
It is all the worse because people are not going to believe it's here until it has gotten really bad for a considerable period of time, and then it is simply going to get steadily worse.
Yes, there are alternatives and we will move toward those alternatives, including nuclear, solar and wind power, and a reorganization of America's suburban geography, but not without enormous pain, and enormous danger.
@Maplefudge May 23rd, 2008 3:58 pm
"The first nation to develop an alternative energy driven military will rule the future."
The current crop of war is about oil, or about ruling the M.E. in order to control the oil. I am probably being NAIVE, but maybe we wont need to make war when the oil runs out. Maybe the returns wont be there to justify spending as much money on military as the rest of the world combined. Maybe defence will go back to being just defence. Then we can reduce our military spending to be in line with other countries, i.e. just 5% of what it currently is.
We would still be one of the best armed countries in the world. While most civilized countries have an unarmed civilian population, the US is overflowing with guns. No one would dare occupy the US. We would have an unprecedented ability to carry out gorilla warfare.
@geo522 May 23rd, 2008 9:20 pm
"Have we reached peak oil?"
We will only be certain that it has occurred a year or two after it has occurred. After oil production has peaked, it will begin to drop. Looking at world oil production curves, (see the oil drum), the world oil production does appear to have leveled out. This is consistent with peak oil, but we will know for certain, with hindsight, in about two years.
You are exactly correct ~GEO 522~.
Have we reached peak oil? Depends on who you ask, but I don't think so, at least not yet. There is no supply problem or supply shortage, the storage tanks are all full, its just a speculative fear of a supply problem. The price of oil no longer has anything to do with supply and demand, its the falling dollar and pure speculation. We are getting the same oil, pumped from the same wells, transported on the same tankers and refined at the same refineries. The only difference now is that the oil companys are making obscene profits since they control the oil from the well to the gas pump anyway. The only real answer is to use less, if they find themselves drowning in oil and profits start going down then they will have to do something.
The world will not be running on empty when the methane gas blooms out into the atmosphere. There will be a full tank and we aren't gonna like it.
http://www.energybulletin.net/3647.html
We aren't gonna be here to see the final fireworks, ___ neither are our children.
Our problems stem from ignoring overpopulation and extreme money-power concentration. Everything else is a band-aid on a hemorrhage.
Thanks Karlof1, I just added The Oil Drum site to my politico tab group in my Seamonkey browser.
This issue strikes at the heart of peace on this planet. Sometimes I feel desperately newtered in my inability to do anything about this. We are for better or certainly WORSE, a personal vehicle dependent society. We (America) have failed our citizens in building the public infrastructure for mass transit.
Either American's aren't aware yet, or in total denial, but if gas gets too much higher, there is going to be REAL hardship, and massive civil unrest.
From what I have been reading, this is a desired outcome by the behind the scenes lever pullers. They watched with narrow eyed interest how the former Soviet Union controlled its citizens with offering a bare minimal lifestyle, keeping them hungry, apathetic, standing in lines for hours for bread, housed in souless apartment blocks and working at mind numbing jobs, all according to the 'five year plan.'
The invasion of Iraq was the beginning of the Sovietization of America.
That is what big oil wants us to believe.
What is the "That" you're referring to truth-telling patriot?
Yes, bbr-001, we discuss climate change and every sort of alternative at theoildrum.com. There are some very sharp fellows there actually doing things to ease the transition to the post-Peak Oil world. I do hope you're correct that this massive run-up in price will spur citizen activism to roll back the Empire so we can finance the alternative systems we'll need.
merryoldsoul--Peak Oil is not about running out; it's about flow rates not meeting demand, which causes a bidding war to ensue pitting each importing nation against the other causing the price to rise because markets function like auctions. And as I noted above, oil is not all the same, which is further driving up the price. There's no use in staying ignorant about the problem when one can easily become informed.
jjpeter--Please take your fine question to The Oil Drum and ask it in the morning on the Drumbeat thread. If the past is any predictor, you will get many answers.
With any luck, Peak Oil will become the #2 issue of the Presidential Election behind Iraq and Bush's War of Terror.
The company that can come up with battery driven trucks and buses, AND cars, that are reliable, long lasting (over 500 miles between charges) and can be charged in an hour, will have the world beat a path to its door.
Inventors - whatcha got?
That is what big oil wants us to believe. If we create an easy to make electric car at the same time as easy to make electricity production with wind, they will lose all their power.
A new energy world order on the realization that demand is inelastic on the short term and profits are large and the population will sit and watch as the trolls fill their caves instead of building the infrastructure to free mankind from its slavery to oil.
Free society from focus on what can't be done. With cooperation and empathy, anything can be done.
No one has mentioned global warming here. At least not directly. In a way, this oil price problem could be a godsend. The market will force us to do what we should have been doing since 1980: Drive less. Drive more efficient vehicles. Develop alternate transportation modes. Better insulate our houses and offices. Develop renewable, sustainable, GHG free sources of energy.
I caught a bit of a New Jersey Republican primary debate on the radio. They were talking about less restrictions on domestic drilling and coal gasification to reduce oil prices. Global Warming will have half of NJ under water before these guys get a clue.
I wonder if Big Oil knows its White House boys are on the way out and is getting while the getting is good. The fact its profits are soaring indicates it is marking up the crude a lot more than necessary. Of course, the last time the White House messed with Big Oil (1974), we all wound up sitting in gas lines. Good luck Mr. Obama!
OIl Oil everywhere, not a mention of Canada, Venuzuala, and the Artic not to mention the fantatic new finds in the south Atlantic, and south China sea, as well as the many many many oil wells capped off here inj the US
The only question now is how the USA will fall apart.
Our now eminent demise ought be noble, but most probably will be weird ugly.
Buy land ASAP ........ and with natural water.
Recycle 1:
I bet you have a really nice family. Be extra careful to keep your little fuel sipper out of the way of the SUVs and semis. Have a great trip.
Oil's stranglehold in our economy has been dependant on Oil being so much cheaper than any other form of energy. Well, guess what. We're gonna keep consuming energy. But now no one has a vested interest in supressing or ignoring cleaner ways to generate it. All hail pricey oil! Now we're free to chase a brighter future.
Should have known Hitler would have had another plan for the US to adopt.
Short window to use our current oil based infastructure to create something renewable is getting shorter.
Maplefudge--The US military will probably utilize the same process Hitler did in case he couldn't get to Baku--Coal to Liquids, CTL. The Air Force has already published about it. Nanotech nukes are also possible.
The first nation to develop an alternative energy driven military will rule the future. The US army uses as much oil as Sweden. When all of tanks and planes are out of gas, some Ewok nation is going to win the day. Possibly Sweden.
Here is a very good article explaining what's happening regarding Mexico's Pemex. What it describes should be coupled with the information provided by Schwartz's article's discussion of Bush's plans for Iraq's oil.
I'm starting the W.O. organization, Walk Only. Encouraging a civilization based around people walking only to get around. If all society shifted to this, requiring total localization, then there would be an extreme drop in the need for petrol and emissions would be greatly cut. No bikes even, because it takes resources and machines to make and maintain them. Nobody needs more than they can carry anyway. I know all the overweight hardheaded people think this is 'impossible' but it isn't if you change your expectations, attitudes, and lifestyle.
And, I say bring on $10, $20 a gallon gas, even more, and all the anarchy it brings because our industrialized, car based economy and culture is unsustainable and has already destroyed the planet for future generations. Let it all fall apart! At last! Hurray! WO WO WO WO WO !!!!!!!!!
Just ten years ago gas was selling for less than a dollar a gallon. What happened?
Guess we did not plan ahead. We thought this day would never come. The grasshopper and the ants theory of economics.
militantliberal--I really do suggest you visit The Oil Drum and debate your point there. You will find some support for your case and much support for its antithesis backed by data, charts, graphs, and links to sources.
sbrownn--For some illumination regarding the impact of inflation and exchange rates on oil price, please see this.
The item states we use 87 Million barrels of OIL per day. This is incorrect. The 87 million is what is called Total Liquids. Actual oil being extracted on a daily basis is about 75 Mbpd. And of this amount, the preferred type is light-sweet, which is the grade that has peaked. The TAPIS grade, which trades in Singapore, is now selling for over $140. US refineries are tooled to utilize the light-sweet from West Texas and now elsewhere, not what is plentiful on the global market--heavy and heavy sour. Iran has 40M bbls of heavy sitting in 20 VLCCs in the Persian Gulf because there are no buyers for it, and its price is much less. The same goes for Saudi's spare extraction capacity of about 3Mbpd--it's all heavy with no buyers. The reason this much cheaper oil isn't being bought is because global refineries were mostly designed by US and EU oil companies to use light-sweet. This is slowly changing as the refineries currently under construction in places like China, Saudi, Qatar, Venezuela, and India will be able to use what is becoming the dominant oil grade--heavy. No similar construction is happening in the US, although a few refineries are being expanded/adapted to accept heavy grade crude. But as implied by these new refineries locations, they won't be exporting much of their product to the US, if any. This relates to the concept/reality of declining net exports/imports. Please see this for an explanation of net exports and the Export Land Model.
Again, I urge people to become more informed on this topic by making The Oil Drum a regular stop for news and discussion of a great many things related to the questions of energy and sustainability.
A large part of the oil price increase here in the US is inflation. Over the last 5 years the price of oil has not risen as fast in other parts of the world. We all knew that our wastrel spending would come back to haunt us in the form of inflation...well, here it is.
Despite what Paul Krugman and Steve Foley have written, I'm very tempted to see a speculative bubble here, even after accounting for the falling dollar and Bush's idiot-diplomacy. It's hard to imagine world oil demand going up by 1/3 in less than 6 months.
RE: gartie "The new economics states: Surging demand + Shrinking resource = outrageous profits by the oil companies."
Good observation.
I've been mulling this very thought and can only conclude that the "outrageous profits by the oil companies" are at least somewhat fueled by shrinking the wages paid to the working class? How many folks really earn a living wage from a 40-hour job anymore? How many families manage on two 40-hour incomes without credit card debit or second jobs? What if those profits were being reinvested in the labor force versus becoming concentrated in the an ever increasing smaller percentage of elites?
Peak oil is certainly the fundamental factor - or better said - the perception of peak oil. But Bush's sabre-rattling against Iran and threats to Venezuela feedback positively onto peak oil. From an investor's point of view there can only be a huge profit to be made from an attack Iran, or other similar monkey-business.
The facts are facts; it is a simple case of supply and demand. There might be a rough ten percent fluctuation in energy prices happening because of speculation/manipulation, but the big picture is peak oil production, particularly with the peak of light sweet crude.
The days of abundant, easy to get to, CHEAP oil is over. All first world countries ( the model for modern industry ) were built on cheap energy sources. Other countries such as China and India want to do the same, but, simple math says this can not happen.
America is five percent of the world's population yet they use twenty five percent of the world's resources, including oil. On a small scale, China wants to consume like the U.S.; math for that just does not work out.
Look into peak oil production; it is a simple geological fact of the oil industry. You can't pump what aint there. It's too bad everyone including the proponents of solar ( not including passive solar) and wind do not talk about conservation; car pooling, walking, mass transit, not eating meat, relocalization efforts, REDUCING CONSUMPTION.
Correct me if I'm wrong, but I believe the net return on energy investment of a typical solar panel is around seven years. It takes a lot of energy to make solar panels. Same with wind generators. If we get in a severe energy crunch ( as is happening much sooner than later ), where will we get the energy to make such energy intensive items as solar panels and wind generators?
So let me see, there is supposed to be a shortage of oil which hikes up the price because demand can not keep up with supply. If i remember my economics 101 class. As demand spikes for a resource that can not be supplied at the levels needed, so does profit margins.
I must be missing something on this one:
The new economics states: Surging demand + Shrinking resource = outrageous profits by the oil companies.
We're driving our family of five from Wisconsin to Seattle in June for a family vacation (stopping to see the national parks along the way). Thankfully, we own a car that gets 38+ mpg on the highway and don't normally drive much at all (which sort of helps alleviate the guilt). I doubt very much that my children will be able to afford to do the same with their children.
The U.S. has been running on more than empty for about seven years now as it plunges into more deficit spending. The price of gas is one result of what Bush has done during his tenure. Besides, I don't see anyone rushing to sell their gigantic gas-guzzling (and unnecessary) SUVs in favor of less costly transportation. In spite of lip-service put out on the media, I don't see any serious rush to find alternative sources of energy. In fact, when planning a construction project, I was told by government offices that solar energy is too costly and faces too many regulations to make it a worthwhile investment. One response to high gas prices is usually that others elsewhere pay more, not much of an argument since there are alternative means of transportation in those lands. Another is to blame China, as usual, for daring to compete for the available crude. We'll pay - and pay and pay - and do nothing about it.
To late folks . . . .
We in America will be paying $6.00 per gallon by this time next year.
Anyone out there want to bet against that?
The taste of money and what can be made in a short time is just to tempting.
Follow the money trail. . . .