Subscribe to Common Dreams News Updates
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
In Iraq, A Surge in US Airstrikes
CAMP TAJI, Iraq - From an Apache helicopter, Capt. Ben Katzenberger's battlefield resembles a vast mosaic of tiny brown boxes.
"The city looks like a bucket of Legos dumped out on the ground," the 26-year-old pilot said. "It's brown Legos, no color. It's really dense and hard to pick things out because everything looks the same."
He uses a powerful lens to zoom in on tiny silhouettes, trying to identify people with "hostile intent" among hundreds of ordinary citizens in Baghdad.
In recent weeks, Katzenberger and other pilots have dramatically increased their use of helicopter-fired missiles against enemy fighters, often in densely populated areas. Since late March, the military has fired more than 200 Hellfire missiles in the capital, compared with just six missiles fired in the previous three months.
The military says the tactic has saved the lives of ground troops and prevented attacks, but the strikes have also killed and wounded civilians, provoking criticism from Iraqis.
On Wednesday, eight people, including two children, were killed when a U.S. helicopter opened fire on a group of Iraqis traveling to a U.S. detention center to greet a man who was being released from custody, Iraqi officials said.
The U.S. military said in a statement that it had targeted men linked to a suicide bombing network. "Unfortunately, two children were killed when the other occupants of the vehicle, in which they were riding, exhibited hostile intent," the statement said.
U.S. officials say they go to great lengths to avoid harming civilians in airstrikes.
"It's not Hollywood and it's not 110 percent perfect," said Col. Timothy J. Edens, the commander of the 12th Combat Aviation Brigade, of the accuracy of his unit's strikes. "It is as precise as very hardworking soldiers and commanders can make it. These criminals do not operate in a clean battle space. It is occupied by civilians, law-abiding Iraqis."
Those civilians include people like Zahara Fadhil, a 10-year-old girl with a tiny frame and long brown hair. Relatives said she was wounded by a missile on April 20 at approximately 8 p.m. in Baghdad's Shiite enclave of Sadr City. The U.S. military said it fired a Hellfire missile in Zahara's neighborhood at that time, targeting men who were seen loading rockets into a sedan.
Her face drained of color and her legs scarred by shrapnel, Zahara spoke haltingly when asked what she thought of U.S. troops.
"They kill people," she said. Lying in bed, she gasped for air before continuing. "They should leave Iraq now."
Shortly after Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki launched an operation in late March to crack down on Shiite militias in the southern city of Basra, Shiite fighters in Baghdad stepped up mortar and rocket attacks against the Green Zone, the fortified area housing many U.S. and Iraqi officials. A handful of Americans were killed in those attacks.
The U.S. military responded by targeting fighters from the air, firing Hellfire missiles almost daily into Sadr City, a vast and impoverished district that is the Baghdad stronghold of anti-American cleric Moqtada al-Sadr. U.S. forces have also supported Iraqi troops on the ground.
Many residents described the recent military operations in Sadr City as indiscriminate attacks. Civilian deaths and damage to homes were key reasons Sadrist leaders demanded that U.S. troops remain on the sidelines of an Iraqi Army incursion into Sadr City this week that has significantly reduced violence there.
At a sprawling air base on the outskirts of Baghdad, Edens, Katzenberger and their colleagues live in small trailers surrounded by blast walls, play volleyball on sand courts and eat at an outdoor food court. Many of the pilots are in their 20s.
The pilots sometimes scrawl messages on the five-foot-long missiles strapped to their "birds." During a recent visit to the base, a reporter saw a missile addressed to "Haji," an honorific for people who have made the pilgrimage to Mecca. Many U.S. soldiers use it to refer dismissively to Iraqis and Arabs in general. Someone wrote "rock this thang" on another.
The small, white trailers adjacent to the airfield where the pilots do paperwork have Christmas lights strung from the ceiling. Two bumper stickers on windows say: "I [heart] Sadr City."
'Cowardly American Bombings' Just before the missile hit, Zahara was returning home from delivering food to neighbors. She was near the door when her grandmother yelled: "Get inside the house!"
As she began to move, the missile crashed into the house, throwing her behind a set of stairs.
One of Zahara's uncles, Dhia Rahi Shaie al-Koreishi, 34, a taxi driver, and her grandmother, Um Fadhil al-Koreishi, were killed by the blast.
"The heart of this family has been ripped out," said Alaa Rahi Shaie, 29, another uncle, who was stoic in describing the death of his brother. "This is his blood," he said, indicating red splotches in front of his home. "And the remains of his head are over there."
He pointed at a large mound of dirt. A group of young boys dug out the remains and then showed visitors a black bag filled with clumps of hair and scalp.
Family members and neighbors said they didn't see anyone in the area fire rockets. Two black funeral banners hung outside the battered home to honor the dead.
"They were killed because of the cowardly American bombings," the banners read.
The U.S. military said it fired a Hellfire missile in the area that night targeting men officials said they saw loading rockets into a sedan, killing two of them. The military said it monitored the sedan for hours before firing, out of concern for "collateral damage to innocent civilians."
Since the fighting intensified in eastern Baghdad this spring, the U.S. Army has kept six Apaches in the air around the clock.
Military officials say they often refrain from firing, even with legitimate targets in sight, because they are afraid of hurting civilians. "As in all wars, when things go wrong, bad things happen," said Edens, the colonel. "There's no doubt that there have been innocent civilians killed in this ugly war."
Pilots do not work alone. In a command center a couple of miles from the airstrip, soldiers monitor live video feeds from Apaches and unmanned drones. The black-and-white images are displayed on flat-screen TVs, and the quiet chatter is dominated by radio exchanges between pilots and soldiers on the ground. Working 12-hour shifts, the soldiers often monitor targets for hours.
"The challenge you run into is he can shoot a rocket and pull into a garage," said Maj. Will Downing, a supervisor at the operations center, as nearby screens displayed grainy snippets of life in eastern Baghdad. "They shoot and they are gone."
'We Are All Helpless' Hassan Ali Kreidy, 54, a barber in Sadr City, felt the power of the Apaches' missiles on April 28 when one ravaged his shop and a handful of other businesses. The apparent target of a strike was a car parked in front, he said.
"What can you say? We are all helpless," said Ahmed Abdul Rahim, who owns a cellphone store that was also damaged. "What have we done to deserve this? Our stores are now in danger. None of us are safe here."
At the Martyr Sadr Hospital late last month, several patients said they were wounded in U.S. airstrikes. Their accounts could not be corroborated; some may have been wounded by errant rockets fired by militiamen.
Hussein Amane Kareem al-Obeidi, 37, a day laborer, lay with a bloody tube sticking out of his right nostril and two others draining fluid from his stomach. They were attached to sacks lying on a filthy floor. One was filled with urine, the other with blood.
He said he was at home on May 1 when a missile landed nearby, damaging nine homes. His mother, standing at his bedside, cursed the U.S. military.
"They are occupiers and they consider whoever is in the city to be an enemy to them!" she said. "They came for the destruction of the country and this is what they are doing."
'This Is for Real. Game On.' Katzenberger, of Kansas City, Mo., fired his first missiles last month. Arriving in Iraq last winter on his first deployment was nerve-wracking, he said.
"You've been building up for this for three years and now you're going to get to do what you were trained to do," he said. "You get this bit of excited rush feeling, like right before you get out of the locker room before a game. We got in the helicopter and started flying up and you start looking down and you're like -- wow. I'm in Iraq now. This isn't back in Texas where we were just training. People down there are going to try to shoot me. This is for real. Game on."
Firing missiles at tanks at a base in Texas during training was exciting, he said.
"There's this big roaring woosh sound, a missile shoots by and there's a flash of light," he said quickly and excitedly. "Then you see this big cloud of smoke in front of you. And then it gets really quiet for a bit. You're like -- oh, oh, I hope I don't miss, I hope I don't miss, don't miss, don't miss, don't miss, don't miss. Then wack! It smacks the target. It's an awesome feeling hitting the target."
Firing his first missile in Baghdad was sobering.
"I know I can do this," he told himself. The target was in sight and permission from ground commanders had been granted. "I've done this before. But you better not screw this up. If you mess up, people get hurt."
Katzenberger said pilots adhere to strict rules of engagement. They occasionally get reports of what happened on the ground after they fire the missiles. After that, "we never hear about it again," he said. "It leaves you a little sense of wondering. You kind of get that detached feeling."
© 2008 The Washington Post



48 Comments so far
Show All"You better not screw this up. If you mess up, people get hurt."
Yes, and people inevitably get hurt and killed when you don't mess up, and everything goes exactly as planned.
Has anybody ever done the math on the economics of using drones and helicoptor-fired missles in an urban war zone to counteract the threat posed by a sniper or a parked car?
And what marketing genius was it that dreamed up the brand names Hellfire and Predator in the first place?
Bill from Saginaw
"Colonel Reyes had already activated the brain of the tremendous self-propelled weapon slung underneath his airplane...So he let the thing go...His friend on the ground asked him what it felt like to give something like that its freedom. He replied that he had at last found something which was more fun than sexual intercourse..."
Galapagos, by Kurt Vonnegut
On this Memorial Day Weekend it would be fitting to acknowledge not only our own dead from all wars but to take a minute or two to acknowledge those dead from 'collateral damage.' For those who have died, whether directly or indirectly from our presence in other countries, at least should have the benefit of our empathy.
Oh, joy - a homocidal video game - with real innocents; men, women and children for targets. Better than sex? This is better than Auschwitz! This is like being an Ancient Volcano God raining Hellfire and Damnation upon humanity.
Here in Seattle I noted a few small groups at different intersections acknowledging the innocents killed. Anyone know of anything bigger organized in the US to bring this point home.
Shock and Awe
Shock and Awe
Until your blood
Becomes our oil
"Petraeus, who is seeking confirmation from the Senate to become chief of the U.S. Central Command (Centcom), claimed that "the number of security incidents in Iraq last week was the lowest in over four years". That has been LARGELY DUE to joint U.S. and Iraqi OPERATIONS in Basra, Mosul and Baghdad's Sadr City, the stronghold of dissident Shia cleric Muqtada al-Sadr, he added."
'Operations' is OrwellianDoubleSpeak for 'rocketing the crap out of the place' and 'constantly overflying helicopter gunships'. So Iraq is 'pacified' like any other Occupied Colony.
"His message was clearly optimistic…and he painted a rosy picture of events," said Fine of FCNL. "He clearly contradicted expectations by holding out the likelihood of a future drawdown of troops in Iraq [in the fall]."
Yeah, you don't need so many troops to simply bomb the hell out of the Iraquis, especially when it goes unreported in the American MSM. May as well cowboy-up to neutron bombs and clear ALL those 'obstructionist humans' away. Especially when they refuse to participate in their own destruction as a nation by bombarding even our Green Zone/Crusader Castle. So much for controlling the rest of that country.
Anyway, there's always Blackwater to take up the slack, for ten times the cost, and no oversight needed for they are 'above the law' in Iraq.
So Petraeus says the 'security incidents' are down. He neglects to mention that 'American air attacks' are up, along with destruction, disruption and civilian deaths (hey, aren't they all civilians, and in their own nation?)
You can see by the "ROSY PICTURE" with the article that Iraq is, after five years with the Americans, in wonderful shape, and America is winning Iraqui hearts and minds. This picture IS Iraq now. We burned it down, on purpose. Mission Accomplished!
Just think what Americans would feel if Russian helicopter gunships were doing this to most American towns "for their own good" and "to wipe out insurgent terrorists that some call freedom fighters".
The air attacks have been stepped up all over Iraq. The Americans are now the "terorists from on high" terrorizing the Iraqui population, and our terrorific Congress has now blessed this travesty, and awarded it yet another quarter-TRILLION dollars it does not have to give.
What insanity has possessed this Congress of the United States? Is it itself in Terror of its own Armed Forces? Is it in thrall to the small-minded Kommandant-Im-Chief and his lackeys? Is it that the mantra of "support the troops" has become the new "sieg heil" and it means personal disaster if one refuses to say it?
The war machine is now running the show. And as war machines are wont to do, it has now broken Iraq, because breaking stuff and killing enemies is a military's only mission (our Department of Defense was more aptly named for most of this nation's history as the Department of War, and could be even more aptly named in this atomic era as the Department of Death- but of course Defense sounds benign and so is an easier sell to the American people in a marketing sense). The Iraqui people have surrendered. Can't we now have our soldiers come home?
Oh yeah, but there is no work for them here, as Republicans will only vote for expending money if it supports the firepower they think protects 'their' wealth.
---"It's not Hollywood and it's not 110 percent perfect," said Col. Timothy J. Edens, the commander of the 12th Combat Aviation Brigade, of the accuracy of his unit's strikes. "It is as precise as very hardworking soldiers and commanders can make it. These criminals do not operate in a clean battle space. It is occupied by civilians, law-abiding Iraqis." ----
So, it's not better than perfect. So, how accurate is it? how much review and "lessons learned" is ongoing?
Are "we" somehow getting better at this ... with all our GPS and satellites ... Why oh why fuck aren't we better? Why do we strike a multistory building to hit a car parked outside? WTF.
What is this accomplishing except, the usual, vengeance?
Why do the "insurgents operate in the midst of the civilian population"?
cuz it's their country.
We would do the same if similarly occupied.
I give Katzenberger a few months before he starts showing signs of PTSD. He already has contradictions slamming around in his head. This guy has a long drop ahead when his bubble finally bursts. Let's hope he doesn't kill anyone as he grows up.
Hoa binh
These criminals do not operate in a clean battle space.
Where did this dinosaur come from? Other than deep-water naval battles, there have not been any "clean battle spaces" since WW1. Even aerial dogfights can injure those on the ground.
The only thing that I can infer from this statement is that everyone engaged in a battle is a criminal.
^^^^ I believe the British regulars had the same complaint about the "unfair" tactics of those nasty revolutionaries who didn't line up neatly to be slaughtered on the field of battle.
http://www.wethepeoplefoundation.org/Update/Update2008-05-22.htm
The idea from the beginning has been to kill those Iraquis who resist the U.S. occupation, and then drive those we didn't, or couldn't, kill, out of Iraq. Then, we bribe the remainder into submission and call it "Democratization" of the middle east. We should see ourselves for what we really are: ravenous demons, killing and maiming for the sake of profits.
The battle for the liberation of Iraq (from the Anericans) will be a long and costly for U.S. taxpayers. Though Iraq has sympathy from the rest of the civilized world, their munitions are limited and their pockets are empty. Nevertheless the daily exposure to killed and maimed wome, children, animals and the elderly guarantee that the Iraqi's will never give up their fight to expel the Americans from their country.
The Iraqis aren't really people so why should the U.S. military give a damn about them. The only lives that matter are those of Israelis and Americans.
The Iraqi Army incursion into Sadr City will run out of steam if the US doesn't support it. Same as Basra. I guess the theory is al Sadr has most of the shiite fighters under his command, so there are only so many rogue fighters, and sooner or later the Iraqi Army and the US gunships will finish them off. Collateral damage is then acceptable as there is an achievable short range goal - to clean inusrgents out of Sadr City.
If they can't keep Sadr City "clean", the Green Zone is at risk, and the longer this local insurgency goes on the worse for the Americans. The insurgents know this and also accept the collateral damage.
What a mess you have gotten us into, Dubya.
c farris: Your post shows what a ghoul you really are. "Iraqis aren't really people?" What are they, vegetables or minerals? What an assinine statement from a real ass.
For the pilots not knowing if they are on target: DON'T SHOOT! Simple as that.
All those innocent children dead for nothing. All those mothers and fathers whose hearts will be forever broken. For what? For America? For Israel? Who made them God? Who made Bush God?
Bring the troops home now and stop the stupidness and misery. We once were better than this.
Stop killing innocent people in order to quench their ability to produce, sell and gain welfare through their oil.
Read Palast's "Armed Madhouse" for another viewpoint, and a deterrent against robbery or even trying to make the next election look like a close call, he has some strategies for doing so in the book, I am sure as a community we can think of a few intelligent additions to his suggestions.
Mine, civil surveillance of the elections on election day, especially in minority and student communities.
SERIOUSLY -0- AFTER 5 YEARS OF THIS SHIT ... Given 5 years of heavy satellite reconnaissance data accumulation, as far as I can figure, the excuses for "bad bombing coordinates" are a pathetic "dog ate my homework" excuse....
Is our lack of concern about Iraqi civilian casualties RACIST? you bet your ass.... ditto Afghan civilian casualties ...
Yes, it's like Fantasia and the Sorcerer's Apprentice segment (which scare the shit out of me and gave me nightmares as a child) ... We are instrumenting the escalation ... we are generating and regenerating the "enemy" ...
It is US of state terrorism , corporate thieves, hired killers and carpet baggers versus the natives. As long as the US government can keep printing money to pay its war racketeers, they will want to stay there and kill indiscriminately for oil. The US terror war scam is running both the US and Iraq. Mr. Obama sounds far too smooth not to be a fellow racketeer, so there will slum clearance and blasting till the last remaining Iraqi nationalist and objector is murdered.
The "surge" is working". If we keep it up, within a few years all of the Iraqis will be dead. Wasn't that the initial Bush plan? Who is going to stay the course next year?
Oh wait, if our next president keeps it up, we'll impeach him. Yeah, that's what our Costitution says.
.
The German Air Force spent two years bombing London and surrounding cities during WWII. ditto Poland.
The Free World condemned and outlawed this, the bombing of civilian cities, the murder of innocent civilians.
The U.S. military has killed between One and Half Million and Two Million Iraqi civilians in six years.
Bush has killed more Iraqi civilians than Saddam. He surpassed Pot Pol, and is closing on Hitler's heinous record.
Look at the photos of these dead children . Read the anger and hate in the eyes of their families and neighbors.
Years from now they will be avenging these murders !!!!!!!
EXPECT IT TO BE VERY PERSONAL !!!!!!!!!!!!!
.
No matter what happens now, or a year, or five years or more from now, this horrible Iraqi story is not going to have a happy ending.
It's nowhere near any kind of ending yet. In fact, the worst may just be getting started. Iraq's most influential Shiite cleric has been quietly issuing religious edicts declaring that armed resistance against U.S.-led foreign troops is permissible -- a potentially significant shift by a key supporter of the Washington-backed government in Baghdad.
More here
" WTF May 23rd, 2008 2:37 pm
...
The only thing that I can infer from this statement is that everyone engaged in a battle is a criminal."
So it's criminal to fight to [defend] your country, community, family, eh?! BS!
" bbr-001 May 23rd, 2008 5:37 pm
...
If they can't keep Sadr City "clean", the Green Zone is at risk, and the longer this local insurgency goes on the worse for the Americans. The insurgents know this and also accept the collateral damage."
Typical American or Western ignorance does that reflect. The Mehdi Army employs the only real means of defence available to them; if they were to mass up in front of the Iraqi puppet govt and U.S. troops, then the MA would not be fighting for defence, for they'd be committing mass suicide.
They most definitely do not want to accept Sadr City residents being killed, but the West does not give the MA any choice, except to operate from residential areas that are still inhabited by people.
It's the West's fault and no one else's. The rest of the world, which is the more civilized part of the world on Earth, said 'NO!'; the UNSC refused to authorise this war, as well as the one on the Taliban (and Afghanistan, as the war on Iraq is also against non-combatants, too, inclusively).
Leave it to ignorant Americans and they'll nearly always come up with stupid and hypocritical views.
WE have absolutely NO legitimate bases upon which to stand in passing ignorant western judgements against the MA!
Notice the serious "eye-bags" Petraeus was sporting as he testified before Congress today?
ah ha ...
Looks like guilt its catching up with him...
He's doped up. They all are.
ddell: C Farris was being sarcastic.
"KEM PATRICK May 23rd, 2008 11:52 pm
He's doped up. They all are."
Perhaps so, and like U.S. bomber pilots flying bombing missions and shooting at visible ally troops while being very drugged up, f.e.; only on what kind of drug?
It's definitely not marijuana, hash (concentrated marijuana, basically), very unlikely is natural, clean cocaine that's not treated or blended with hard drugs like crystal meth. and which then no longer is cocaine, but crack, etc.
Crystal meth., maybe? It's a powerful amphetamine, i.e., "upper", and I suppose this might therefore be a commonly, enough, used drug in the military; when in the war (of aggression) fronts anyway. I know only that it's the latter and apparently very addictive, but haven't a clue if it causes or "helps" to cause consumers to be violent.
If it was marijuana or hash, or even clean cocaine, then it wouldn't be the cause of the extremely violent and criminal nature of the acts these people commit and wittingly so. The only explanation I could then see for their violence would be that they're "simply" psychopaths, like this being part of their characters and not dating from recent years; perhaps more like being their entire or most of their lives, so far. Or it'd be cocaine and in very large doses, but I'm not sure that that would cause users to be violent.
They definitely do seem to have real, deep lust for committing violence against innocent people though. Maybe they don't need any drugs to "help" them to be as criminally violent as they are.
Speculation; but definitely not marijuana or hash.
It's speed ...pure government issue speed!
Corporate drug company contracted designer speed ...the kind that professional Pentagon video war gamers who thrive on!
The kind that would allow you to write a book in one night about the kind of American military terrorism that just one pilot can carry out in one mission!
Let's just more of our great grandchildren's money to play war games and get their rocks off.
Let's give our great grandchildren's money away to the war mongers so they can play war games and get their rocks off.
It's the whole social culture that promotes this violence, it starts when they are born and their mother's are not allowed to bond properly with their children, they right on to the school of self-alienation.
We have a real problem in this county.......
marci,
Yes, speed does seem, to be, to be strongly likely, if not a certainty; and now that I think of it, I believe the U.S. pilot who shot at totally visible, identifiable (very demarked and in broad daylight) British troops in Iraq was reported to have been pumped up on speed, evidently very potent shit.
I wonder if the govt also "provides" the troops or the worst killers among U.S. forces some kind of hallucinogens, meaning additionally; or else replacement, "alternative".
MA_Matriarch,
I wonder if "men" like them really could have "rocks", but if not, then I can't imagine what would be in their place; something that normally is of surreal nature, say. Okay, so many of them have progenerated, I agree; but I wonder if this was in a normal way.
Anyway, and for people who aren't really sure, a good reminder that this indeed is CONTINUED WAR is the following Quiz, which is accompanied by the answers, from which I'll quote.
"5th Annniversary Iraq War Quiz: Answers",
FCNL.org, a Quaker Lobby with respect to U.S. govt legislation, Mar 14 2008,
http://www.fcnl.org/issues/item.php?item_id=3202&issue_id=35
QUOTE/SNIPS:
...
d. 79% of Iraqis are opposed to the presence of coalition forces in their ocountry according to a poll conducted in August by BBC, ABC, and the Japanese broadcast service NHK.
...
d. About 70% of Iraqis believe the US "surge" of extra troops over the past six months has worsened the security situation. This is according to the aforementioned BBC/ABC/NHK poll conducted in August of 2007, and published last September.
...
3) In 2006, the US-led forces dropped an average of almost 4 bombs per week in Iraq. In 2007, how many bombs per week were dropped in Iraq?
a. About 28 bombs per week—air strikes have increased by more than a factor of 5.
...
d. 144 parliamentarians, a majority of the Iraqi parliament, signed a legislative petition last May calling for a timetable for the complete withdrawal of coalition forces from Iraq.
However, usually the US administration consults with the parliament, not the Iraqi cabinet. The cabinet is solely controlled by the five "separatist" parties that support a long term US presence in Iraq. For more ....
...
a. The rate of Iraqis fleeing their homes has quadrupled during the surge. ...
...
c. The Lancet report estimated that US-led forces have been directly responsible for the deaths of 31% of those Iraqis killed by violent deaths in the last 5 years. Most of the deaths counted were from coalition air strikes. ...
Both sources should be taken as rough estimates that should be updated, but these studies provide an important context to the violence, highlighting the greatly underreported air war in Iraq. The most deadly 12 month period during the Iraq war directly followed the Lancet report, from July 2006 through June 2007. Also, since 2006, the US has increased its troop presence and its use of air strikes by more than fivefold.
...
84% of Iraqis are calling for the withdrawal of all coalition forces within one year, or by March 2009
...
END QUOTE/SNIPS.
THAT [IS] WAR! People can argue that it's not war given that Congress hasn't declared 'war', but that's a BS argument! No one who's critically sharp could depend on words of war criminal Congress when it's been LONG covering up the criminal and Nazi-Bush family.
Not sure what I mean by the latter? I posted considerable excerpt from a very recent article by Robert Parry.
http://www.commondreams.org/archive/2008/05/23/9151/#comment-283742
"You get this bit of excited rush feeling, like right before you get out of the locker room before a game." braindead rednecked amerika still producing the vilest variant that the human animal at its lowest state of deprivation can be. Proud o proud 'nation'!
The punch line of course is tragic beyond words that these twisted little killer clones want you to believe they are doing it for apple pie and the scar spangled hubris that they have been programmed to repeat. When the sick obvious fact is that militarily made killers kill and kill again because it does something in their brains that a normal dumb jock gets from between his legs. Pity the people later that must live (and die) with such a whacked out peace of garbage when it comes back to 'Texass'..
Wars seem to come in stages.
The first stage is when political operatives envision grateful Iraqi men throwing flowers at the American troops, and waving condoms too.
The second stage, just after the invasion, is when the grateful Iraqi scenes are all staged for the American public. In this case young Saudis were bussed in for the statue removal scene, and an aircraft carrier was ordered to hold its position offshore for the "mission accomplished" pictures.
The third stage is when the U.S. starts not getting what it wants: "democracy" plus vast kickbacks plus peace. What we've done as a rule is promoted the drug lords because they have some local power and they don't like the national government. However, as a rule the friendly drug lords sell the enemy all of our weapons, and they are adept at selling the drugs to our troops.
So with the gun, we change their democracies like our shirts. The fourth stage is when we get tired of dying and bankrupting our own nation. At this point we declare every civilian of certain invaded countries to be enemies. We split the population into two camps and order them to exterminate each other. Also, we give up on talking to the people and bomb everyone. This tactic somewhat reduces our casualties. It leads to environmental nightmares in the target country, for generations.
The fifth stage is when we've been there forever, when the local resistance knows all of the American tactics by heart and knows through long experience how to fight back. In Vietnam it was the tunnels, the patrol booby-traps and NVN negotiating for SAM missiles. So far in Iraq it's using shaped charges in powerful IEDs, and well-coordinated ambushes. At home, the sitting president says we'll lose face if we withdraw now. Translation, he'll lose face. Eventually he signs a face-saving giveaway treaty, withdraws partially, and later in phase six America loses.
The first stage is when political operatives envision grateful Nigerian men throwing flowers at the American troops, and waving condoms too.
I guess "hostile intent" is anything or anyone who is against bush/cheney. You're either with us or against us. If you're against us, you're probably a terrorist. If you're a terrorist, you'll probably want to kill us someday. So we will pre-empt you now. The bush/cheney doctrine. Impeach now.
Truthmonger, that's the imperial presidency for ya. King George demands unconditional loyalty.
"He (Pilot Katzenberger) uses a powerful lens to zoom in on tiny silhouettes, trying to identify people with 'hostile intent' among hundreds of ordinary citizens in Baghdad."
Unbelievable! So he plays God and pretends to know if someone thousands of feet below him has "hostile intent." It doesn't matter, he's going to drop the bomb anyway. No proof of wrong-doing needed; just a suspicion is good enough. Incidentally, what does "hostile intent" mean? Defending his country against illegal invaders and occupiers who are committing genocide and theft of their oil?
What can anyone say to stop the madness? We do not belong there.
Can anyone not understand why these people and so many like them around the world who have been subject to atrocities carried out by the US directly or indirectly, will hate Americans until the day they die? I even hate what America is doing and I am American.
9 out of 10 casualties in modern warfare are civilians the most vulnerable of which are children. In effect, war today is war against children; our children. War is not the answer; it never was. And given the technical advancement in our ability to wage war it can only lead to the extinction of the species.
Religion and nationalism are the enemies of all mankind. They align people on either side of an illusionary line that serves no one; are used as a device to instigate wars for the profit of the ruling classes; are the ultimate means of controlling the masses and perverting their ability to live life in peace.
Line from "With God on Our Side" by the Neville Brothers seems appropriate here.
But now we got weapons
Of the chemical dust
If fire them we're forced to
Then fire them we must
One push of the button
And a shot the world wide
And you never ask questions
When God's on your side...
So now as I'm leavin'
I'm weary as Hell
The confusion I'm feelin'
Ain't no tongue can tell
The words fill my head
And fall to the floor
If God's on our side
He'll stop the next war.
Remembrance Day 2008
My memory of war starts with World War II. I was just a boy during the war and it was largely an adventure to us, but I remember the quiet pride and the sadness in the eyes of the increasing number of mothers who hung a gold star in their window, never knowing if my mom might be next and my big brother gone.
The wars, great and small, were legion in the last century. My dad lost his leg in the Phillippines in 1913. WW-I, was the "Great War to end all wars." An entire generation died in the trenches. One of my uncles, who lied about his age, was the first, and youngest, soldier from Oregon to die in that war, at the battle of Chateau Thierry.
The memory of man is short and only twenty years passed before another generation was thrown into the meat grinder to stave off domination by Hitler's Nazis, Mussolini's Fascists and Imperial Japan's expansion.
We had hardly buried the dead and recovered from the shock of the realities of nuclear annihilation when East and West went at it in Korea, a war which still goes on, the fighting finally just stopped by mutual agreement.
The cold war and the covert wars went on, then along came Vietnam. Since then, the "little" wars have gone on all over the world, like bush fires in the California hills, consuming human and material resources.
In 2001, we saw the tragedy of 11 September and its aftermath. Then we watched another war in Afghanistan, which has been swallowing up armies since the time of Alexander the Great. We are now in the fifth year of a horrendous war in Iraq, which is killing US troops in the thousands, and Iraqis in the hundreds of thousands and fostering still more hatred and unrest. We are facing yet another"preemptive" war in Iran and possibly Syria. Once more the toll will be enormous.
Amongst the dead may be the man who would have discovered the cure to cancer and other deadly diseases, the composer who may have surpassed Mozart or Brahms, the playwright or poet who might have succeeded Shakespeare, the statesman who could have brought about world peace or the person who might have been able to end world hunger.
Those are the might-have-been's. The reality is the millions of humans who have died, fathers, brothers, sisters, mothers, children, fighters and civilians in this past century, all with the dream of peace and human dignity before them. Yet, with the new millennium, war still goes on around the world.
Let us give pause in remembrance of those who died, often alone and forgotten, victim of mine and booby trap, sniper fire or disease and infection, whose resting place is unmarked save for perhaps a little more verdant growth where they have nurtured the soil.
Let us give pause in remembrance for those who survived, maimed in body or soul by the atrocity of war.
Let us give pause in remembrance for those who survived to carry on, with nothing but memories, of which they do not speak.
Let us give pause in remembrance for those whose lives ended abruptly, without warning, on 11 September. And those of all nations and beliefs who continue to die by war and terrorism.
Let us give pause and reflect, that we might carry out our lives in such a way that love and tolerance might overbalance hatred and bigotry in the scales of life and the dream of peace might become a reality, so those we remember today did not die in vain.
Steve Osborn
Mike Corbeil:
You're right. It is the US to blame for the carnage in Sadr City. We shouldn't be in Iraq, and that has lead to this Israeli/Palestinian-like situation there now.
Air force pilots do take something akin to speed to keep them alert during long hours in flight. There was an article about it some time ago. It might be one of those don't ask / don't tell things.
Things happen fast, too. There was a reporter imbedded with a Patriot missile battery early in the campaign. Right after explaining how those missles should not have shot down a British jet, they almost all got killed when they "painted" an armed F-16 and the pilot let them have it. He didn't have time to decide if the radar signal was friend or foe.
Only 7 months left. What do the following names have in common? W Clinton, A Gore, G H W Bush, J Kerry, Hillary O (obliterate) Clinton, B Obama, even J McCain.
Answer: We wouldn't be in Iraq if any one of them had been President on 9/11.
What are doing in Iraq?
Killing Iraqis who refuse to go along with our reorganization plan for them.
Is this morally acceptable?
Is it worth American lives?
Can we afford it?
Is it making us safer?
Is it increasing our prestige internationally?
Is it making us more energy secure?
Has anybody figured out how much damage we've done to Iraq?
How many buildings have we destroyed? What percentage of buildings in Bagdan and Falluja and Basra have we destroyed?
How many bridges, hospitals, museums, mosques, streets, powerplants, neighborhoods and schools have we destroyed?
How many have we fixed?
Also, is shooting missiles into a crowded neighborhood where there's a very big chance that innocent civilians will be killed a war crime?
Just another case of Bush Leaguers "raining" freedom for those dark skinned people in far away lands. But what the hell, the weapons were gathering dust anyway, pilots need tickets punched for promotions and then analyst/commentary gigs. To mis quote a timeless classic, "we have to destroy them to provide them liberty and justice for all." Death and horrors from above, now that's America under Bush and the US War Machine. When Sadr City is finally, if not already, reduced to rubble, yet another case of "mission accomplished."
That is the picture of the USA I always carry in my head....The world's only superpower firing high tech rockets from high tech helocopters into a crowded slum full of civilians.
This mental picture can be applied to anywhere in the world there are US financial interests...Africa, Middle East, Latin America, SouthEast Asia....
It is a portrait of a modern Empire in action.
If there IS a GOD, I am sure it is burned into his mind as well.
We can shoot them but they can't shoot back!
gryphon, I believe the song you mentioned is an old Bob Dylan song from the sixties. The words are certainly as appropriate for today as they were during the war in Vietnam.(Or any war for that matter) I don't believe God takes a side in war. It's two groups of people with power and money, sending the children of people with no power and little money to fight their battles. The winning group gets more power and lots of money and the rest of us get screwed.