EMAIL SIGN UP!
Most Popular This Week
- Corporate Win: Supreme Court Says Monsanto Has 'Control Over Product of Life'
- How the US Turned Three Pacifists into Violent Terrorists
- Cornel West: Obama 'Is a War Criminal'
- Revealed: How US State Department 'Twists Arms' on Monsanto's Behalf
- Victory in Seattle as Teachers Win Battle in Standardized Test Boycott
Popular content
Today's Top News
USDA Head Downplays Calls To Cut Biofuel Mandate
WASHINGTON - Agriculture Secretary Ed Schafer said ethanol is not having a "major" impact on food prices, and downplayed calls by lawmakers and industry groups to make changes to programs that promote increased use of biofuels.
Prices for wheat, corn, soybeans and rice have set record highs at the Chicago Board of Trade this year. Around the world, rising food prices have lead to hoarding of wheat and rice, bread lines and food riots.
It has prompted demands from some to pull back the throttle on the boom in ethanol and other biofuels, touted as a home-grown way to reduce U.S. reliance on foreign energy.
In Congress, two dozen Republican senators have pushed to revisit a mandate passed last December that calls for a fivefold increase in biofuels output by 2022.
Schafer told reporters that demand for biofuels is having an impact on food prices, "but it is not a major factor."
He said there would be few benefits from changing the renewable fuels standard, reducing the tax credit for producing ethanol as proposed in the farm bill or ending the ethanol import tariff.
"The change in the renewable fuel standard, the change in tariff or duty isn't going to affect food prices," said Schafer. "We need to focus on things that will actually have an effect instead of a short-term political solution."
The Grocery Manufacturers Association, echoing concern in the food industry and from aid groups, earlier this month blasted the growing use of corn to make fuel that is driving up the cost of virtually all commodities.
"It's clear that American families are facing unbearable pressure -- pressure that Congress can help relieve by revisiting and revising the mandated diversion of corn to ethanol production," said GMA spokesman Scott Faber in a statement.
The Bush administration estimated 3 percent of the more than 40 percent increase in world food prices last year is due to demand for corn for ethanol use. Early this month, USDA estimated about a third of this year's projected 12.1 billion-bushel corn crop will go toward ethanol production in 2008/09, up from about 25 percent in 2007.
Farm and biofuel groups and USDA say factors other than ethanol are primarily to blame for higher food costs, including high oil prices, increased global food demand and a drop in grain production because of drought in parts of the world.
"The policy choices we have made on biofuels will deliver long-term benefits, but we also have to recognize that there may be some short-term costs or dislocations involved," said Schafer.
USDA chief economist Joe Glauber said food prices would rise by 5 percent this year, the highest rate since 5.8 percent in 1990, as retailers pass higher energy and commodity prices to consumers.
Food prices usually rise by modest amounts, roughly 2.5 percent and below the overall U.S. inflation rate. Prices rose by 4 percent in 2007.
Reporting by Christopher Doering; Editing by Marguerita Choy
© 2008 Reuters
Comments
Note: Disqus 2012 is best viewed on an up to date browser. Click here for information. Instructions for how to sign up to comment can be viewed here. Our Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines. Note to Readers: Spam Filter May Capture Legitimate Comments...

7 Comments so far
Show AllMy food rose more than 4%last year. Where are these figures from?
WE will not admit mistakes... This is what is wrong in Government America. Lets just make up numbers, we'll just print more money! Food only up 5% for the year. Do you buy food? Or are you someone who complains when your latte price goes up, and don't tip the Barista, because its their fault!
I'm not sure what is going on except that we are being lied to.
2022? America (and the world) will be lucky to survive into 2010 at this rate...kudos turnoffyourtv! PRINT ALL THE MONEY$ IN THE WORLD! Rebate checks for all the boys and girls!!
The concept of using food to make fuel for cars is, in itself, a morally bankrupt idea. From that starting point, we should be looking to non-food bio-fuel sources. Of course, when more money can be made growing (the precursor to) gasoline, what crazy farmer will grow food? Maybe we need to rethink our whole ethos on this. Or, we should devise a use cycle wherein the fuel component is extracted from the "waste" products of food production, not the primary crop.
The electric car (one that plugs in to be recharged) is on the way (rumored to be 2010). Imagine having a photovoltaic array that supplies your car, and your home, with the energy required to run. That seems to take petroleum out of the equation altogether. Why is our government not encouraging its citizens by way of meaningful tax credits and/or low interest financing to realize these alternatives?
Another article today was about the Greensgrow mini-farm. Read their FAQ item for why food prices are up:
http://www.greensgrow.org/pages_04/faq.html#Anchor-49575
Use of grain for biofuels is only one of the five reasons they cite (including the weak US dollar and disappointing grain harvests).
Biofuels have potential to be a very positive thing if managed correctly, so don't burn bridges...
Biofuels from food crops can never be a good thing.
Biofuels from non-food crops grown on land unsuitable for food crops that don't destroy rain forests and other important environmental organs can be useful.
Biofuels from biodigesters, using human or animal manure can be useful.
For more information visit:
1) Biogas China http://www.i-sis.org.uk/BiogasChina.php
2) Green Algae for Carbon Capture and Biodiesel
http://www.i-sis.org.uk/GAFCCAB.php
3) How to be Fuel and Food Rich Under Climate Change
http://www.i-sis.org.uk/HTBFAFRUCC.php?printing=yes