Thousands Killed by US's Korean Ally
Grave by mass grave, South Korea is unearthing the skeletons and buried truths of a cold-blooded slaughter from early in the Korean War, when this nation's U.S.-backed regime killed untold thousands of leftists and hapless peasants in a summer of terror in 1950.
With U.S. military officers sometimes present, and as North Korean invaders pushed down the peninsula, the southern army and police emptied South Korean prisons, lined up detainees and shot them in the head, dumping the bodies into hastily dug trenches. Others were thrown into abandoned mines or into the sea. Women and children were among those killed. Many victims never faced charges or trial.
The mass executions - intended to keep possible southern leftists from reinforcing the northerners - were carried out over mere weeks and were largely hidden from history for a half-century. They were "the most tragic and brutal chapter of the Korean War," said historian Kim Dong-choon, a member of a 2-year-old government commission investigating the killings.
Hundreds of sets of remains have been uncovered so far, but researchers say they are only a tiny fraction of the deaths. The commission estimates at least 100,000 people were executed, in a South Korean population of 20 million.
That estimate is based on projections from local surveys and is "very conservative," said Kim. The true toll may be twice that or more, he told The Associated Press.
In addition, thousands of South Koreans who allegedly collaborated with the communist occupation were slain by southern forces later in 1950, and the invaders staged their own executions of rightists.
Through the postwar decades of South Korean right-wing dictatorships, victims' fearful families kept silent about that blood-soaked summer. American military reports of the South Korean slaughter were stamped "secret" and filed away in Washington. Communist accounts were dismissed as lies.
Only since the 1990s, and South Korea's democratization, has the truth begun to seep out.
In 2002, a typhoon's fury uncovered one mass grave. Another was found by a television news team that broke into a sealed mine. Further corroboration comes from a trickle of declassified U.S. military documents, including U.S. Army photographs of a mass killing outside this central South Korean city.
Now Kim's Truth and Reconciliation Commission has added government authority to the work of scattered researchers, family members and journalists trying to peel away the long-running cover-up. The commissioners have the help of a handful of remorseful old men.
"Even now, I feel guilty that I pulled the trigger," said Lee Joon-young, 83, one of the executioners in a secluded valley near Daejeon in early July 1950.
The retired prison guard told the AP he knew that many of those shot and buried en masse were ordinary convicts or illiterate peasants wrongly ensnared in roundups of supposed communist sympathizers. They didn't deserve to die, he said. They "knew nothing about communism."
The 17 investigators of the commission's subcommittee on "mass civilian sacrifice," led by Kim, have been dealing with petitions from more than 7,000 South Koreans, involving some 1,200 alleged incidents - not just mass planned executions, but also 215 cases in which the U.S. military is accused of the indiscriminate killing of South Korean civilians in 1950-51, usually in air attacks.
The commission last year excavated sites at four of an estimated 150 mass graves around the country, recovering remains of more than 400 people. Working deliberately, matching documents to eyewitness and survivor testimony, it has officially confirmed two large-scale executions - at a warehouse in the central South Korean county of Cheongwon, and at Ulsan on the southeast coast.
In January, then-President Roh Moo-hyun, under whose liberal leadership the commission was established, formally apologized for the more than 870 deaths confirmed at Ulsan, calling them "illegal acts the then-state authority committed."
The commission, with no power to compel testimony or prosecute, faces daunting tasks both in verifying events and identifying victims, and in tracing a chain of responsibility. Under Roh's conservative successor, Lee Myung-bak, whose party is seen as democratic heir to the old autocratic right wing, the commission may find less budgetary and political support.
The roots of the summer 1950 bloodbath lie in the U.S.-Soviet division of Japan's former Korea colony in 1945, which precipitated north-south turmoil and eventual war.
In the late 1940s, President Syngman Rhee's U.S.-installed rightist regime crushed leftist political activity in South Korea, including a guerrilla uprising inspired by the communists ruling the north. By 1950, southern jails were packed with up to 30,000 political prisoners.
The southern government, meanwhile, also created the National Guidance League, a "re-education" organization for recanting leftists and others suspected of communist leanings. Historians say officials met membership quotas by pressuring peasants into signing up with promises of rice rations or other benefits. By 1950, more than 300,000 people were on the league's rolls, organizers said.
North Korean invaders seized Seoul, the southern capital, in late June 1950 and freed thousands of prisoners, who rallied to the northern cause. Southern authorities, in full retreat with their U.S. military advisers, ordered National Guidance League members in areas they controlled to report to the police, who detained them. Soon after, commission researchers say, the organized mass executions of people regarded as potential collaborators began - "bad security risks," as a police official described the detainees at the time.
The declassified record of U.S. documents shows an ambivalent American attitude toward the killings. American diplomats that summer urged restraint on southern officials - to no obvious effect - but a State Department cable that fall said overall commander Gen. Douglas MacArthur viewed the executions as a Korean "internal matter," even though he controlled South Korea's military.
Ninety miles south of Seoul, here in the narrow, peaceful valley of Sannae, truckloads of prisoners were brought in from Daejeon Prison and elsewhere day after day in July 1950, as the North Koreans bore down on the city.
The American photos, taken by an Army major and kept classified for a half-century, show the macabre sequence of events.
White-clad detainees - bent, submissive, with hands bound - were thrown down prone, jammed side by side, on the edge of a long trench. South Korean military and national policemen then stepped up behind, pointed their rifles at the backs of their heads and fired. The bodies were tipped into the trench.
Trembling policemen - "they hadn't shot anyone before" - were sometimes off-target, leaving men wounded but alive, Lee said. He and others were ordered to check for wounded and finish them off.
Evidence indicates South Korean executioners killed between 3,000 and 7,000 here, said commissioner Kim. A half-dozen trenches, each up to 150 yards long and full of bodies, extended over an area almost a mile long, said Kim Chong-hyun, 70, chairman of a group of bereaved families campaigning for disclosure and compensation for the Daejeon killings. His father, accused but never convicted of militant leftist activity, was one victim.
Another was Yeo Tae-ku's father, whose wife and mother searched for him afterward.
"Bodies were just piled upon each other," said Yeo, 59, remembering his mother's description. "Arms would come off when they turned them over." The desperate women never found him, and the mass graves were quickly covered over, as were others in isolated spots up and down this mountainous peninsula, to be officially "forgotten."
When British communist journalist Alan Winnington entered Daejeon that summer with North Korean troops and visited the site, writing of "waxy dead hands and feet (that) stick through the soil," his reports in the Daily Worker were denounced as "fabrication" by the U.S. Embassy in London. American military accounts focused instead on North Korean reprisal killings that followed in Daejeon.
But CIA and U.S. military intelligence documents circulating even before the Winnington report, classified "secret" and since declassified, told of the executions by the South Koreans. Lt. Col. Bob Edwards, U.S. Embassy military attache in South Korea, wrote in conveying the Daejeon photos to Army intelligence in Washington that he believed nationwide "thousands of political prisoners were executed within (a) few weeks" by the South Koreans.
Another glimpse of the carnage appeared in an unofficial U.S. source, an obscure memoir self-published in 1981 by the late Donald Nichols, a U.S. Air Force intelligence officer, who told of witnessing "the unforgettable massacre of approximately 1,800 at Suwon," 20 miles south of Seoul.
Such reports lend credibility to a captured North Korean document from Aug. 2, 1950, eventually declassified by Washington, which spoke of mass executions in 12 South Korean cities, including 1,000 killed in Suwon and 4,000 in Daejeon.
That early, incomplete North Korean report couldn't include those executed in territory still held by the southerners. Up to 10,000 were killed in the city of Busan alone, a South Korean lawmaker, Park Chan-hyun, estimated in 1960.
His investigation came during a 12-month democratic interlude between the overthrow of Rhee and a government takeover by Maj. Gen. Park Chung-hee's authoritarian military, which quickly arrested many then probing for the hidden story of 1950.
Kim said his projection of at least 100,000 dead is based in part on extrapolating from a survey by non-governmental organizations in one province, Busan's South Gyeongsang, which estimated 25,000 killed there. And initial evidence suggests most of the National Guidance League's 300,000 members were killed, he said.
Commission investigators agree with the late Lt. Col. Edwards' note to Washington in 1950, that "orders for execution undoubtedly came from the top," that is, President Rhee, who died in 1965.
But any documentary proof of that may have been destroyed, just as the facts of the mass killings themselves were buried. In 1953, after the war ended in stalemate, after the deaths of at least 2 million people, half or more of them civilians, a U.S. Army war crimes report attributed all summary executions here in Daejeon to the "murderous barbarism" of North Koreans.
Such myths survived a half-century, in part because those who knew the truth were cowed into silence.
"My mother destroyed all pictures of my father, for fear the family would get an image as leftists," said Koh Chung-ryol, 57, who is convinced her 29-year-old father was innocent of wrongdoing when picked up in a broad police sweep here, to die in Sannae valley.
"My mother tried hard to get rid of anything about her husband," she said. "She suffered unspeakable pain."
Even educated South Koreans remained ignorant of their country's past. As a young researcher in the late 1980s, Yonsei University's Park Myung-lim, today a leading Korean War historian, was deeply shaken as he sought out confidential accounts of those days from ordinary Koreans.
"I cried," he said. "I felt, 'Oh, my goodness. Oh, Jesus. This was my country? It was true?'"
The Truth and Reconciliation Commission can recommend but not award compensation for lost and ruined lives, nor can it bring surviving perpetrators to justice. "Our investigative power is so meager," commission President Ahn Byung-ook told the AP.
His immediate concern is resources. "The current government isn't friendly toward us, and so we're concerned that the budget may be cut next year," he said.
South Korean conservatives complain the "truth" campaign will only reopen old wounds from a time when, even at the village level, leftists and rightists carried out bloody reprisals against each other.
The life of the commission - with a staff of 240 and annual budget of $19 million - is guaranteed by law until at least 2010, when it will issue a final, comprehensive report.
Later this spring and summer its teams will resume digging at mass grave sites. Thus far, it has verified 16 incidents of 1950-51 - not just large-scale detainee killings, but also such events as a South Korean battalion's cold-blooded killing of 187 men, women and children at Kochang village, supposed sympathizers with leftist guerrillas.
By exposing the truth of such episodes, "we hope to heal the trauma and pain of the bereaved families," the commission says. It also wants to educate people, "not just in Korea, but throughout the international community," to the reality of that long-ago conflict, to "prevent such a tragic war from reoccurring in the future."
Associated Press investigative researcher Randy Herschaft in New York contributed to this report.
© 2008 Associated Press
Twitter
StumbleUpon
Facebook
Delicious
Digg
Newsvine
Google
Yahoo
Technorati
38 Comments so far
Show All#
NMBill May 20th, 2008 6:02 pm
Broken Link Above:"A NEW LOOK AT THE KOREAN WAR"
Sorry for mistake, here is the full URL to best article I found to post that puts truth to the lie of the who the aggressor was in Korea.
he author of A NEW LOOK AT THE KOREAN WAR is a U.S. Army veteran and the Chair of the Korea Committee of the Veterans For Peace. The URL is:
http://www.veteransforpeace.org/Korea_war_statement.vp.html
One of the startling points raised in the article is:
'Out of some 5.7 million Americans G.I.s who had served in the Korean War...'
An old Marine vet of WWII, Korea, and Viet Nam, referred to Korea as "The big one!" From the perspective of a combat veteran. It was the hardest land warfare in the annals of US military history.
Both Truman and Eisenhower threatened to use nuclear bombs to relieve what would have been the complete whipping-out of American divisions. The stalemate was negotiated under the same threat.
So, considering everything, the US lost in its attempt to conquer all of Korea, and imperial designs on China, at least within a clique close to General Douglas MacArthur, who later ran for president, as a fascist fringe candidate like McCain today.
And who is Rev. Moon? What connection does he have to the Secretary-General of the United Nations? And where does that leave us in relation to non-aggression on the part of the US and UN in Korea?
Free Korea of US Imperialism!
When I was a kid American propaganda claimed that the only good red is a dead red or better dead than red or just kill the commies or the best commie is a dead commie. This was the unstated trope sung in the mass media. We are told by "liberals" that violence is wrong yet the USA government most always supported by liberals always committed violence and earned the reputation as the most right wing war mongering government in the world.
Is it not fair to say that the only good capitalist is a dead capitalist and death to the fascists? When are liberals going to stop supporting fascistic ideas and practices? When will liberals join the left and fight against the USA government?
Humans are relatively violent animals. A subset of humans called right wingers are particularly violent.
What is the ethical way of dealing with human violence?
Does pacifism work? Does violence work? What is the role of revenge in human behavior? When is revenge justified? Or is it never justified?
Actually I think the number killed in Korea, if you count all of the factors of death from war ---is much closer to 8 million people in the north and south combined, not the 2-3 million usually mentioned.
Major Hutton: you got to f'n kidding me! You say the North did that kind of stuff, so that makes it right that the South and their American overlords do it too? You are one of the many reasons why I support an independent Texas.
BubbaSouth and NotGoingAlong:
Good references. Also, see I.F. Stone's Secret History of the Korean War.
And for all of those "progressives" who like to put Eisenhower up on a pedestal (for his military-industrial complex warning), remember it was his monolithic view of communism that resulted in so many Amerikan misadventures.
major hutton says:
"As a retired army combat officer ALL soldier, no matter
what their rank is, is trained & told do NOT follow
unlawful orders - no execptions."
If that is true, why is it that they do follow unlawful orders, almost without exception? I'm not saying that all orders are unlawful, but many are, and it is extremely rare for a soldier to disobey an unlawful order in the US military.
Broken Link Above:"A NEW LOOK AT THE KOREAN WAR"
SOUTH KOREA; INVADED NORTH KOREA!
Yes, I am challenging the Big Lie, as we having been doing on 9/11, Afghanistan, Iraq, Yugoslavia, Somalia, Panama, Grenada, Nicaragua, Cambodia, and Viet Nam. Are we to suspend all that we have learned about the systemic treacherous conspiracies of false flag operations and enforced propaganda consistently reinforced by giving "lip service" to the prevailing obligatory obeisance to the imperial war machine, at minimum for credibility, acceptance, and publication. So what can be expected from an Associated Press investigative researcher? The obligatory adherence of the Big Lie!
A NEW LOOK AT THE KOREAN WAR
'The truth is that the Korean War really started in 1945 when the U.S. suppressed the KPR government and imposed its military rule in the southern part of Korea.
In addition to the tragic division of Korea, the U.S. also refused to recognize the Korean People's Republic (KPR), a nationwide, progressive, people's government which had been organized by the anti-Japanese nationalist Koreans before the arrival of American troops in South Korea in September 1945. Instead of cooperating with KPR, the U.S. created a military government in its zone of occupation, outlawing the KPR and the popular People's Committees under the control of KPR. This is the key to a full understanding of the origin of the Korean War.
The truth is that the Korean War really started in 1945 when the U.S. suppressed the KPR government and imposed its military rule in the southern part of Korea.
During the American Military Government (1945-1948) and the period from the establishment of the Republic of Korea (ROK) in the South in August 1948 to the full-scale war in June 1950, the U.S. military and the fascist Rhee regime, allied with pro-Japanese Koreans, either imprisoned or killed hundreds of thousands of Korean nationalists and socialists in order to establish a separate, pro-American government in the South. This savage repression resulted in bloody armed struggle by the angry Korean peasants, workers, students, and soldiers all over southern Korea. Major armed uprisings took place in Daegu, Cheju Island, Yosu, and Sunchon. In Cheju island alone from 1948 to 1949, more than 30,000 Koreans were killed, out of 300,000 population, by the South Korean police/military forces and right-wing youth gangs under the direction of the American military officers.
Thus, when the armed clash broke out in June 1950, it was more or less a continuation of the past conflicts. It was certainly not a surprise attack. The anti-communist dictator Syngman Rhee was openly preaching a military unification of Korea by attacking the North. At the same time, the North Korean leader Kim Il Sung was also preparing for a military counter-attack against the South when Rhee attacked. The U.S. was fully aware of the tense situation and took advantage of it for justifying its rapid, gigantic military build-up plan which was first presented in April 1950 as National Security Council resolution #68. When the fighting started on June 25, each side accused the other for starting the war. Under this murky picture, President Truman nevertheless labeled the civil war as a naked aggression of communist world against a free nation, and intervened in the war under the UN flag to avoid an official declaration of war in the U.S. Congress.
The U.S. Army, Air Force and Navy were directly involved in the killing of about three million Koran civilians—both South Koreans and North Koreans…the U.S. Air Force was probably more responsible than any other branches for the huge number of civilian killings because of its indiscriminate shootings and bombings of civilian refugees, villages, towns, and cities in violation of Hague Conventions. At the end of the war, almost all the North Korean cities were leveled to the ground by carpet bombing,
Numerous incidents of individual and group rapes of Korean girls and women have been reported both in South and North Korea during the War. This problem still persists in South Korea even today due to the continuing presence of some 37,000 U.S. troops there…U.S. also experimented with biological weapons in the North, with the active assistance of the Japanese war criminals who were involved in human experiments during WWII.
On July 9, 1950, MacArthur sent a "hot message" to Joint Chiefs of staff (JCS) suggesting use of atomic bombs. On November 30, 1950, Truman himself threatened use of weapons of mass destruction, including atomic bomb, at a news conference. In December 1950 MacArthur asked for commander's discretion to use nuclear bombs requesting 34 of them. He also proposed spreading a belt of radioactive cobalt across the neck of Manchuria. In June 1951, JCS considered use of atomic weapons in tactical battlefield circumstances.
At the outbreak of the War, the S. Korean regime had some 100,000 political prisoners in jails. As the S. Korean military retreated to the south, the Rhee regime apparently issued orders, with possible approval of the U.S. advisers, to kill all the political prisoners. These prisoners were taken to the fields, mountains or sea and executed by the S. Korean police or military police, often in the presence of U.S. military advisers or intelligence agents who took pictures of the mass killings.
U.S. Army's history of the Korean War incredibly blamed the North Korean troops for this horrendous mass murder. In addition, hundreds of thousands of North Korean civilians who were followers or suspected supporters of the North Korean government were arrested and executed in cold blood during the U.S. occupation of North Korea in October and November 1950.
Today South Korea's annual military budget of about $15 billion is several times greater than that of the North's. In addition, South Korea's population is twice that of the North's, and its GNP is over 20 times greater. However, the Pentagon is still mired in the Cold War mentality, claiming that the U.S. military still needs to be stationed in South Korea to guard against the alleged North Korean military threat. Furthermore, the American military-industrial complex wants to continue the Korean War by putting North Korea on the list of terrorist countries and maintaining some 37,000 troops in South Korea today—wasting about $25 billion each year in overall costs maintaining the outdated military commitment in the Far East. starting a gradual withdrawal of our troops from South Korea…
the U.S. wouldn't have to proceed with the building of the expensive "star wars" national missile defense system, which may cost more than $300 billion…peaceful reunification of Korea and bring about a new era of peace, prosperity and friendly cooperation in the Far East. Unfortunately, the Bush administration is escalating tensions on the Korean peninsula by accusing North Korea as an "axis of evil" and contemplating a pre-emptive strike against North Korea. At this dangerous time of an indefinite "war on terrorism" that may easily be extended to Korea, it is all the more important for concerned American people, especially veterans working for peace and reconciliation, start raising their voices in demanding a final end to the Korean War and a new policy toward Korea.'
My interest is enhanced by having been stationed at the northernmost US Military camp in South Korea. I was part of an occupying army, at the base of mountain to protect a US nuclear missile site, when JFK was assassinated. I have seen from where the aggression came. And the US invasion of Cuba and consequential Cuban Missile Crisis, were precisely a response to the US invasion in 1961 by JFK.
Korea, Viet Nam, and Iraq were all betrayed and attacked like other countries before the 'Cold War' - Mexico, the Philippines, and Hawaii to name just a few.
I read and agree with the motives outlined by I.F. Stone in his seminal book, 'The Hidden History of the Korean War'; Korea was on the road to invade China for regime change! To overthrow Mao's Revolution of 1949. Getting US troops in an untenable position, necessitating dropping atomic bombs of
China. That was what Gen. Douglas MacArthur and his reactionary backers were after.
The Korean War was US aggression by using fascist war criminals like themselves as front men. And it is true today in Afghanistan, Iraq, and South Korea.
Bill
This what happens when people are allowed to take revenge, when you rely on your Gut, to to deside about how to react to Violence. thats how we ended up in Iraq & Afghanistan. Remember how Bush talks about Gut feelings.Don't think about Just do it.
Sukarno was the victim of a plot where he thought his enemies were attacking him but it was the CIA. (they say)
This brought in Suharto; with NO heart. A brutal killer!
In all this talk of Korea and the war, I didn't see any mention of my favorite, "The Hidden History of the Korean War" by I.F. Stone. Time for a re-read for me.
WASHINGTON said "Didn't Sukarno do away with 300,000 "communists" when he took power in Indonesia and it was just news at the time…no outrage…as long as they were communist and not people its always been OK to kill them."
NO NO NO!!! This makes me think that you think they're all the same, little brown people with almost the same name, so how can we be expected to tell them apart, and what difference does it make anyway? I looked in vain for a correction from someone else.
It wasn't Sukarno who killed the, perhaps as many as a million, communists. It was Suharto. General Suharto.
Sukarno was the father of Indonesian independence, the first president, who was overthrown by the Generals, a leader of whom was Suharto. People, it does matter.
what was it Orwell said
In times of deceit the truth will seem revolutionary
bbr-OO1 please read the post just above yours.
Every nation has its evil moments in history. The Koreans had been kicked around by the Chinese, Japanese and Russians for centuries, so no wonder they are ferocious warriors.
Several Vietnam vet friends have told me the safest place in Vietnam was with a Korean unit. The VC and NVA were scared to death of them.
What is important is that today South Korea is a democracy and good world citizen.
Notice how we always seem to side the bad guys.
The Korean War of course was the first UN War, made possible by the Potsdam agreement reached by Stalin, FDR and Churchill, which divided Korea into North and South. The Soviets stepped into the North and began arming North Korea, while the South was not provided with weapons, despite 10 million dollars authorized by Congress for this purpose (same thing happened that allowed us to lose China to Communists, money authorized for the Nationalists never got there while the Soviets armed the Communists). The division of Korea into 2 parts by foreigners was not expected to go over too well, so it was expected a well armed North Korea would invade a lightly armed South Korea to unify the country. Cheju-Do massacre of 30,000 between 1948-1949 may have been a motivation for the North as well.
http://www.kimsoft.com/1997/43wh.htm
Some believe the Korean War was intentionally planned as early as 1945, and used as an example to promote the soon to be formed UN in action as a force of good.
It is interesting that when the UN voted for War to defend South Korea, the Soviets could have vetoed it, being on the security council, yet they abstained.
Taiwan, controlled by the Nationalists who fled from the Communists in 1949, saw the Korean War as an opportunity to recover the mainland, and argued to take offensive action against Communist China. Everyone anticipated China would get involved in supporting North Korea. They were told to back off. And of course, China did move into North Korea, yet McCarthur was told there was no possibility of this by the CFR controlled state department, despite intelligence saying otherwise, so we lost a lot of troops who were "surprised" when China made it's "unexpected" move.
During the "War" many suspected, including McCarthur, that North Korea had advanced knowledge of their plans, and of course they did. The communists in the CFR controlled state department leaked information to Russia military advisers. General Walker said as much, saying the source of the leaks were coming from DC.
General McCarthur in a speech given on December 5, 1952, was quoted as saying: "Never before has this nation been engaged in mortal combat with a hostile power without military objective, without policy other than restrictions governing operations, or indeed without formally recognizing a state of war" And this led to Vietnam on, and on, all the way to today in Iraq. Wars are fought not to win, but to utilize our industrial production capacity to profit the MIC, force the government into debt fighting these long wars without end to profit the international bankers, and secure geostrategic interests (we thought Vietnam had much more oil that it did, and oil exploration was taking place under the protection of military operations off the coast). Another benefit was to kill off as many patriots as possible in fighting these phony wars.
You see, the enemy of Globalists who created the UN are patriots of nation states. They seek the end of nationalism, and have corrupted government to the extent our government actively works to destroy this country, which is necessary for One World Government.
In 1944, a CFR memo to the state department read "The sovereignty fetish is still so strong in the public mind that there would appear to be little chance of winning popular assent to American membership in anything appoaching a superstate organization. Much will depend on the kind of approach which is used in further popular education....."
So Patriotism is a fetish. Unfortunately, the education, or dumbing down of America has worked well over the last 60 years. The psychopaths rule, and the herd sees the Lie as it's Truth. Patriotism today is waving a flag and cheering on the home team against the enemy. Anyone we fight is the enemy. Anyone who thinks for themselves and questions the lie is a "terrorist'. It is said Kissinger was overheard speaking in a Bilderberger meeting last year, "In America, we consider anti-globalists to be the a terrorist". I would not be surprised if he did say it.
This AP article is groundbreaking as it reverses the lens through which we in the West view the Korean War. Indeed, history records that between 1945-1950 the US reinstalled collaborationist members of the Japanese colonial administration in the South, and helped them crush resistance and workers' revolts. The US occupying forces even declared martial law after a series of strikes. After a series of border skirmishes we can surmise that the North realised that Korea would remain divided, and decided to invade to help free the thousands imprisoned by the South. The brutality of the Southern regime had already been revealed, but reached a fever peak before the North reached Seoul.
Thus the North's invasion was not unwarranted, but they suffered grievously for it. At least two million died in the war that reduced the North to ground zero conditions. I have an uncle who served in Korea, landing in Inchon only to find complete devastation. The trauma and secret pain of so many remains to this day.
>>The Cheju Island massacre (UN estimated 30,000) occured FOUR YEARS before the North invaded the South<<
That is not correct. There was a communist uprising on the island in April 1948 which was put down with about 4000 casualties among the rebels. That was less than two years before the invasion. This was not a massacre. In 1950, AFTER the North invaded the South, the government of the South ordered the execution of 14-30,000 leftists and communists on the island many of whom were flying the flag of North Korea. Facts facts facts...
The Cheju Island massacre (UN estimated 30,000) occured FOUR YEARS before the North invaded the South and is the subject of Picassos, painting.(google Picasso Korean Massacre to see the painting).
Have done a considerable amount of research on the subject and living
in Korea for years brought me to conversations with various colleague
professor friends and artists. Also have Korean family who in the mid 1970s as children witnessed the disappearance of fathers of childred who had blurted out innocently 'family secrets' in school. Below are just a few examples of recent documentation a less than one sided - 'ALL the blame be on the communists' self-righteous position/attitude.
April 2006, President Roh Moo-Hyun officially apologized to the
people of Jeju Province for this massacre.
============
Program for the International War Crimes Tribunal on U.S. Crimes in
Korea
June 23, 2001, Interchurch Center, New York
PROGRAM SCHEDULE
Friday, June 22
Friday's events are at the UN Church Center, 777 UN Plaza, East 44
St. and First Ave.
11 am Press Conference
Presentation by Ramsey Clark former U.S. Attorney General
12 pm Lunch
1-4 Orientation for Jurists and Prosecutors
4-5 Joint Session of Jurists and Prosecutors
5-8 Reception for Jurists, Prosecutors and Observers
Saturday, June 23
Saturday's events are at Interchurch Center, 475 Riverside Drive and
West 120 Street
9 am Registration
Registration fee is $10. Childcare is available
downstairs.
9:30 Introduction of Survivors, Prosecutors, Jurists, and
Co-Chairs by Wol-san Liem and Yul-san Liem
9:50 Cultural Presentation
10:00 Opening Session: Opening Statements by Co-Chairs Sara
Flounders and Yoomi Jeong
10:30 Remembrance for the Dead, led by Yoomi Jeong
11:00 Presentation by the Joint Chief Prosecutors Ramsey Clark
and Byun Jung Soo
click on for full report:
http://www.iacenter.org/Koreafiles/ktc_program.htm
================================================
Reporters from Stars and Stripes provided vivid and uncensored
accounts of the South Korean Army's brutal suppression of the
rebellion and the local popular support of the rebels
===========================
South Korea's Truth Commission reported 14,373 victims, 86% at the
hands of the security forces and 13.9% at the hands of armed rebels,
and estimated that the total death toll was as high as 30,000.[1] The
Koreans committed these atrocities in front of the U.S. military. The
Americans documented the massacre, but never intervened.[7]
=======================
(Another source of recent history of investigations)
Abstract of a paper presented at the Symposium held on March 28, 1998
at the Sung-gyun-kwan University, chaired by the Cheju April 3rd 50th
Anniversary Pan-National Committee.
Kim Jong Min, Reporter, Chemin Ilbo (Cheju People's Daily)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----
The 1960 April 19 Revolution
Rhee Syngman's pro-American dictatorship was brought down on April
19, 1960 by the people. The Korean people demanded the truth about the
massacres of innocent civilians by the UN troops in Kuh-chang, Ham-yang and other
towns during the Korean War. Encouraged by these pro-democracry movements
on the mainland, the Cheju people demanded the truth about the April 3rd
1948 'incident" on their island.
The South Korean National Assembly instructed its Innocent Civilian
Massacre Investigation Commisssion to look into the Cheju massacre in addition
to the Korean War massacres of civilians. The assembly dispatched an
investigative team to the island. Incredibly, the team was headed by Choe Chun, who
was the chief prosecutor of the Cheju police during the massacre! The
team found no evidence of crime. Undaunted, the people of Cheju formed various
organs to chronicle the crime.
The 1961 Military Coup
The May 16th military coup put an abrupt stop to pro-democracry
movements. One day after the coup, the massacre investigators were arrested. The
Cheju Sinbo editor was jailed. The police confiscated the funds alloocated
for the vitims's families by the National Assembly. In 1962, Song Yo Chang,
who commanded the 9th Regiment and responsible for the scorched earth
tactics during the insurrection, became the prime minister. Park Jung Hee
allowed no mention of the April 3rd incident.
An April 3rd Novel in 1978
The seventeen years of silence was broken by Hyon Ki Young's novel
based on the massacre. Hyon told a "fictional" story of a massacre on Cheju.
The story moved the Korean people into a new search for the truth about
the massacre. However, this awakening did not last long. Hyon was
arrested and the novel's publisher was shut down by the government. Once again the
April 3rd was "forgotten".
The June 1987 Pro-democracy Revolution
In June 1987, the Korean people stood up against the military
dictatorship. The people won the right to elect their president directly (viz.
indirectly through the National Assembly). The main opposition candidate Kim Dae
Jung called for an investigation into the April 3rd Incident in his
campaign for the presidency. Kim lost the election and so did the Cheju victims.
However, the Cheju people brought up the April 3rd incident issue in every
election since then.
The 1988 Democracy Opening
With the easing of military dictatorship, the cries for justice for
the Cheju people began to sound louder. Hitherto suppressed publications
came out into open in floods. In particular, "Research on the April 3rd
Cheju Insurrection" by Yang Han Gwon (Seoul National University master's
degree thesis) and "Research on the Cheju April 3rd People's Uprising" by
Park Myong Lim (Koryo University master's degree thesis) have provided
extensive documentary evidence for the incident. The Education Ministry
attempted to suppress Park's thesis on the ground that it was pro-North Korea.
1989 - The Cheju People's Initiative
On April 3rd, 1989, Cheju Daily began to publish an investigative
serial "the April 3rd Witness". It was a result of a yearlong field
investigation by a special team headed by Yang Cho Hun. Hyon Ki Young established
Cheju April 3rd Research Institute on May 10, 1989. The first open memorial
service for the victims was held in this year. The police lobbed tear
gas into the crowd and disrupted the memorial service.
1990 - The Tri-Party Coalition
The government reversed itself and put the April 3rd on the
subversives' list. The news reporters working on the Cheju 3rd incident were
indicted for pro-North activities. The Cheju Daily was forced to stop its serial.
The government issued a statement saying that the incident was within the
law and there was nothing further to report on.
Police interrupted the 42nd anniversary service and mass arrests were
made of the mourners. Kim Myong Sik who authored "The Cheju People's
Uprising" was belatedly arrested for violating the National Security Law.
In spite of the continuing police terrorism, the former reporters of
Cheju Daily continued to publish their reports on Chemin Daily - "The April
3rd Speaks". The Daily has published 410 witness accounts since June
1990.
1992 - The Squirrel Incident
In April 1992, eleven sets of skeletons of the people killed in the
April 3rd Massacre were found in a squirrel's nest. This grisly discovery
made the headlines and the demands for the truth regained momentum. Various
civic groups sent petitions to the US government and Seoul for justice. The
April 3rd memorial service ended in a bloody confrontation between the
police and the students. The Cheju students were supported by Hanchonryon
(banned by Kim Young Sam in 1996).
1993 - "Civilian" President
Kim Young Sam, so-called 'civilian' president, took office in 1993.
On March 20, the Cheju April 3rd Special Committee was inaugurated after a
year's preparation under Kim Young Hun. The committee's mission was to
publish the truth, exonerate the victims, and institute proper memorial services
for the dead.
In November 1993, the people of Buk-chon-ri published a list of their
dead: the village lost 412 members. 409 of the victims were executed by the
military without any trial.
1994 - 75 Assemblymen for a new investigation
On February 2, 1994, Byun Jung Il, an assemblyman from Cheju, filed a
motion for a special committee to get the truth on the April 3rd, Byun was
backed by 75 members of the Assembly. On February 7, a vitims ombudsman
office was created by the Cheju Assembly and it began to accept petitions from
victims' and their relatives.
In March 1994, Chemin Daily published two books of witness accounts -
"The Cheju April 3rd Speaks". For the first time, various separate
memorial events were combined into a single joint memorial service. Certain
news organs continued to advance the "Communist" rebellion thesis and
attempted to discredit the memorial service. In addition, the Agency for
National Security Planning set up bogus 'patriotic' groups to disseminate
misinformation.
In June 1994, the right-wingers intensified their activities to
suppress the truth. The General Association for Freedom in Korea (led by Kim In
Sun) convened a "symposium" to expose 'Communist rebellion'.
1995 - April 3rd Report #1
In June the Cheju Assembly 4.3 Committee published its first report
in witness accounts. It listed 14,125 victims including 610 children
under 10 and 638 seniors citizens over 61.
1996 - National Assembly 'Act'
On December 17, 1996, the National Assembly passed the 'Cheju April
3rd Fact Finding Committe Establishment Act'. Little has come out this 'act'.
1997 - The 50th Anniversary National Committee
On the eve of the 50th anniversary of the April 3rd (1948) Massacre,
various civic organs formed a national committee to commemorate the 50th
anniversary. The Cheju Assembly Special Committee published a revised
list of 14,504 victims.
Documentaries on the April 3rd were widely shown on college campuses
and many young Koreans learned for the first time the unspeakable crimes
committed by their government. Producers of the documentaries were
arrested or tortured by Kim Young Sam's police.
1998 - Kim Dae Jung
Kim Dae Jung has stated in his election campaigns that the Cheju
April 3rd incident should be reexamined.
The history of empires is one of using terror and murder (including killing people in mass) to gain and maintain power and steal wealth and territory. If you want to end this stuff, the you can start by ending empires.
But, of course, it goes much much deeper than this. Just look at the way we are as a species. It's one ever on-going homicide, suicide, and ecocide. You'd think we must have another little sphere in space stored in reserve from the way we abuse the current one and ourselves.
In truth, humanity suffers from obvious insanity and everyone deep down knows this to be true. Unfortunately, we are unwilling to face this truth and make a serious change. We are like drug addicts who just can't wait to get another fix even though we know it will mean premature death. We are ruled by compulsive abusive behaviors - that's what humanity is all about (just ask an advertiser).
Yep, so we are insane. As a species we are insane.
Is there any hope? Maybe if each and every one of us goes into rehab and other forms of therapy - for several generations. Good luck on getting the worst of the addicts there though. Think the Dick who is the illegitimate VP (that's right, i'm talking about you Cheney!) will ever admit that he's a completely f*cked up bastard?
I would show this article to my father (who was serving in Germany at the time) ,but he would only accuse me of bashing his beloved Harry Truman.
He'd ironically have to side in with the self proclaimed neo con piece of shit above.
By the way I was in the Marine Corps when I was young ,but that doesn't make me feel obligated to stand up for tyrants now that I've a better understanding of the world.
Pardon my french ,but anyone claiming to be a neo con I mean come on how could anything I say be more offensive than that?
When you look back over history, the real history, not the propaganda that passes in our schools as history, the so-called, free and democratic US will be looked upon as one of the most vile nations that has ever been on the face of this earth. Their blatant use of power fueled by greed has driven the world's greatest democracy to become the world's greatest purveyor of death and destruction.
Does anyone really believe that the puppet Korean regime did anything without consulting the US Military? And that the US Military took these decisions w/out Washington's approval? This is the true face of 'America' many people have seen around the world. And it ain't pretty. Not pretty but sad, very sad...
Is this what McCain is talking about when he says he wants an ongoing occupation in Iraq similar to the one in Korea?
Dear kivals (May 19th, 2008 1:39 p.m.).
See Chalmers Johnson's book Blowback: The Costs and Consequences of American Empire. Your South Korean friend's assertions are well-known in many parts of the world; the massacres didn't and don't get press stateside.
Dear Texican (3:58 p.m.),
You write, "As for the Korean mess, keep in mind that the north koreans [sic] did this too."
One of the points being made by Charles J. Hanley & Jae-Soon Chang is that the US watched and essentially condoned (and doesn't the US argue that its policies and rules of engagement are indeed different than those of, say, a North Korea--or at least used to argue so rather successfully). See http://www.democracynow.org/2005/5/18/25_years_ago_the_kwangju_massacre
For a good idea of the number of Tiananmen Square-type massacres, worldwide, that have been ignored see Naomi Klein's Shock Doctrine.
Do not unto others as you would not have done unto you.
Love thy neighbor.
Do good unto all.
Love thine enemy.
Do not judge a man until you have walked a mile in his moccasins.
Now we seem to follow a different path.
If someone thinks differently, kill him.
If someone looks different than you, kill him
If someone prays differently, kill him.
If someone interferes with your profits, kill him.
If someone possesses something you covet, kill him.
Perhaps we should reorder our priorities?
I don't know of any living American who has fought for our freedom.
John Butterfield, U.S. Navy 1968 - 1972
Didn't Sukarno do away with 300,000 "communists" when he took power in Indonesia and it was just news at the time...no outrage...as long as they were communist and not people its always been OK to kill them.
The US has always condoned or looked the other way in cases like this....and as long as I've lived...70...Korea is still a mystery. I have a sense of what's going on everywhere else in the world but Korea is an enigma.
Yo jclientelle
As a retired army combat officer ALL soldier, no matter
what their rank is, is trained & told do NOT follow
unlawful orders - no execptions. As for the Korean mess,
keep in mind that the north koreans did this too. That this
was a fight for the life of free South Korea. Who invaded
whom? north comminest korea did. Your military does
depend on soldiers & commanders knowing what they are doing
is good and necessary. Civilians due to where they are
sometimes do get hurt & killed. War is not a game. It must
be (unless invaded) the last resort that a government uses.
Long after talks, discussion, give & take have taken place,
then you use force - the military. Been that way from the
start of recorded history & will remain so till the human
race grows up, becomes educated & uses reason in its dealing
with others. So when you see a vet or military person do
thank him/her - thier sacrifice gives you your freedom.
Encourage good men & women to join & serve so that we all
will keep our freedom. Think jclientelle!
thanks,
George
your favoright neocon, retired army combat vet & Texican
It is honorable and useful to forewarn soldiers that they may be asked to kill civilians. The warning may give some young people courage to resist enlisting or to resist following immoral orders. They will not be so taken by surprise.
The military depends on soldiers who believe on some level that what they are doing is good and necessary.
The McCain/Lieberman axis will say:"Freedom isn't free". A ponderous two-volumn book, "The Origins of the Korean War", by Bruce Cummings is worth plowing through for non-official details of the conflict made inevitable by the casual division of a homogenous 3000 year old culture by the Truman gang. Georgia's own Dean Rusk was one of the colonels in Washington who had to look up Korea in old National Geographics to find a place to draw a line, because they didn't know beans about Korea. Nothing ever changes.
I thought that the massacre of South Korean civilians at No Gun Ree was bad but this is worse.
Korea was another war based on lies.
Many in the Korean officer corps (south)
had been collaborators under a long running
Japanese occupation. They helped the Japanese
crush any signs of partisan resistance.
The Korean army (south) was rebuilt and then
dominated by the the US military.
"By exposing the truth of such episodes, "'we hope to...prevent such a tragic war from reoccurring in the future.'"
if only the revelation of truth by itself could prevent a re-occurence of these kinds of crimes! it hasn't proved to be the case, though, of course, it's a necessary first step.
lining people up on the edge of a trench and gunning them down was a popular form of killing by the nazis. the major example of this form of atrocity was a place called baby yar. are not all of these inhuman regimes
(created, supported, and funded by the u.s., from what we have learned, from guatamala to indonesia) merely imitations, cut out of the same cloth, of that ultimate symbol of absolute evil?
here is yet another instance of america's benign, democracy-spreading foreign policy!
First time I have ever heard of this!
That doesn't suprise me though. This thinking is alive and well today.
Nothing has changed with the media; the U.S. public is still in the DARK.
This story is sickening but not entirely surprising. Communism is bad because because Communists commit indiscriminate political massacres, so to stop it we must commit indiscriminate political massacres.
This detail is interesting: "Trembling policemen - "they hadn't shot anyone before" - were sometimes off-target, leaving men wounded but alive, Lee said. He and others were ordered to check for wounded and finish them off." In his book Ordinary Men, Christopher Browning reports similar dismay (initially) among German Ordnungspolizei ordered to massacre Polish Jews in 1942. It makes me wonder whether the Seoul regime consulted any German "experts." I also wonder what new facts will come out about the Vietnam War ten years from now or our current occupation fifty years from now.
Questions for researchers:
1. How many of these atrocities were planned well in advance, and how many committed in the heat of invasion panic?
2. What did Truman know and/or approve? Given his proven lack of mercy toward Japan in the summer of 1945, I'm NOT hopeful the killings were a factor in MacArthur's removal.
3. To what extent did these massacres provoke spontaneous retaliation by the Pyongyang "liberators" or merely serve as a handy pretext for killings already planned?
I had a good friend from S. Korea who had been involved in student protests for democracy back in the 1960s and 1970s. According to her, there had been quite a few Tiananmen Square-type massacres in S. Korea over the years, with hardly any coverage in the US press. Quite a few of her friends had been killed in the streets or later in their beds for having been seen at the protests. Unlike the Chinese in 1989, S. Korea was a staunch US ally so the government's actions were deemed reasonable by the US government.
Wasn't it Howard Zinn who said that even in morally unambiguous wars like WWII there are no good guys or bad guys, just winners and losers?