Toxic Wombs
When Canada declared bisphenol-A, a chemical widely used in baby bottles, water bottles and canned food, toxic to fetuses and children, it finally brought some credibility to what environmentalists, public health advocates and many reproductive endocrinologists have been warning against for some time. Even better, the United States National Toxicology Program declared that we should be concerned about bisphenol-A in a draft report. "The possibility that bisphenol-A may alter human development cannot be dismissed," wrote the authors of the draft. That's a subtle, but huge admission. Bisphonol-A is a chemical, a hormone-disrupting chemical, that is present in over 90 percent of Americans.
There's more: the leading journal on reproduction, Fertility and Sterility, recently published the proceedings of the Summit on Environmental Challenges to Reproductive Health and Fertility, a gathering of 400 leaders in the field. The report states that exposures to chemicals during critical windows of development and vulnerability may result in impaired development and function of the reproductive tract and reduced fertility, as well as other illnesses, not only for the developing children, but for that child's progeny -- your future grandchildren. There is already evidence that this intergenerational effect is taking place.
The preponderance of the evidence on the harmful effects of hormone-disrupting chemicals stems from studies and observations of the animal world. In the 1990s, studies began to consistently link hormone-disrupting pollutants with reduced fertility in fish, amphibians, reptiles and birds. These associations are strong and well-documented.
Among humans, we are witnessing a number of disturbing trends in fertility. There has been a worldwide increase in the number of men with low sperm counts as well as a 1 percent reduction of testosterone in men per year for the past 40 to 50 years. In women, there have been declines in the age that breast development occurs and that girls experience their first period. There has also been a continuous rise in the rate of endometriosis and polycystic ovarian syndrome, the two most common conditions associated with infertility -- both with strong evidence of links to environmental factors.
Skeptics say there isn't definitive proof that these chemicals have much of an effect on the fertility of humans. The reality is, the sort of evidence they are waiting for would be a devastating tragedy, along the lines of the 2006 movie, Children of Men, a flash forward to the year 2027, when homo sapiens could no longer procreate.
Bisphenol-A is not the only hormone disrupting chemical that people, especially those trying or ever wanting to have children, should try to avoid. Phthalates and parabens are two others found in our everyday products. But there are also the chemicals used in pesticides, herbicides, insecticides, and flame retardants. Of course, getting these chemicals out of the environment would go a long way to reducing exposure through food and water, but there are several steps anyone can take to reduce their exposure now. For couples planning to start a family, the time to make changes is at least three or four months before trying to become pregnant.
First, buy organic foods when you can. They contain less hormone disrupting chemicals. Some hormones used in conventional dairy production can increase your risk of twins or triplets whereas others can interfere with ovulation.
Second, eat less meat. Many chemicals are stored in animal fat. Herbicides and pesticides sprayed on fields become concentrated in fat so that by eating a hamburger, you get that cow's lifetime accumulation of these hormone disruptors.
Third, avoid plastic water bottles with the number 3, 6 or 7 in the "recycle triangle symbol." Instead use glass or stainless, or plastics with the number 1, 2, 4 or 5. Never microwave food in plastics as it causes more of these chemicals to leech out in your meal.
Fourth, examine your cosmetics. Personal care products are a huge source of hormone disrupting chemicals. Nail polish, containing phthalates, is one of the biggest offenders. Look for organic products instead or check out the "Skin Deep" database at the Environmental Working Group's website, www.ewg.org, for cleaner alternatives. One chemical-free nail polish line I found on the web is called No-Miss polish.
Fifth, install a reverse osmosis water filter to reduce perchlorates (implicated in thyroid disorders and thyroid cancer), PCB's (associated with endometriosis) and Bisphenol A -- all of which are frequent contaminants of tap water.
Sixth, pay attention to the products you use around your home. Many cleaning products have hormone disrupting properties, and common weed killers have been linked to lower sperm counts. Seek cleaner alternatives now widely available at local stores.
Seventh, start a prenatal vitamin three or four months before you start trying to have a child. The antioxidants help repair and DNA damage that has occurred.
Laurie Tarkan specializes in health reporting and is a regular contributor to the New York Times and national magazines. Look for more fertility-preserving tips in her new book, Perfect Hormone Balance for Fertility, co-authored with Dr. Robert Greene, reproductive endocrinologist and hormone expert.
Copyright © 2008 HuffingtonPost.com, Inc.
Twitter
StumbleUpon
Facebook
Delicious
Digg
Newsvine
Google
Yahoo
Technorati
10 Comments so far
Show AllThanks for this article. Too little on this topic has been in the national conversation. However, information about hormone disrupting materials in consumer goods has been around for a long time. Twenty years ago I said that one possible cause of heterosexuality might be a deficiency in plastics.
Not that emasculated yet, esarge. ;) Hurt feelings have nothing to do with it, just don't abide by these kinds of generalizations, and felt I had to call it out. Having children is a natural thing, and not every man must have a vasectomy. We can't scream at the anti-abortionists for telling a woman what she should do with her body, and make assertions about what a man should do with his. See what I mean? Maybe you need to stop eating off of so much plastic--sorry couldn't resist. :D
Have to agree... hmm, men acting more like women, less children being cranked out... where's the problem? The whole world needs more of this stuff! A little feminization could benefit the world, don'tcha think? Maybe it's evolution. Maybe we'll be an amazon race in a few hundred years, looking back on these ancient creatures called "men" and how they fought wars and stole and oppressed each other and basically turned the world into a craphole because they were blinded by a drug in their systems called "testosterone". And maybe then we'll talk about how they died out just in time to save the world before it was too late, Gaia be praised, and children will be shocked and amazed at how close we came to extinction.
Maybe instead of telling people how to avoid this chemical so they can keep cranking out overpopulation babies to satisfy their selfishness and lust to please their primitive male war god, we should be looking into how to get this chemical into more places instead.
chessgames your feelings are hurt and that's understandable, but what if JBPM has a point - even though he makes a horribly broad generalization.
Not all men are having children to prove our masculinity - some of us are not having children at all. I am conflicted because on the one hand I am a highly intelligent, contemplative, peace-loving person, who probably SHOULD have a child, but on the other hand I see the increasingly precarious situation the human race is in, and I don't want to add another drop to the ocean. It seems so unfair that people who have no concern for the overall picture, who are blissfully stroking their little egos are having children one after the other like chain smokers lighting a cigarette from the previous butt, while the ones who care about the planet are phasing out their own genes.
I can be a good step father. I can mentor. I can pass on the nurture rather than the nature, and I can have faith that having lived the most positive and aware life I was able to will count for as much as passing on my genes. At least, I hope I can.
As long as we men insist on not getting vasectomies and pumping out tons of kids to suit our outdated notions of masculinity, then maybe we "need" these sorts of disruptions.
--Wow, do you recommend we make them mandatory? What income level should qualify? Of course, we should not exclude tubal ligations for women either. Newsflash: not all men have children to prove their masculinity. We must get away from this kind of stereotyping, and war between the sexes. If you want this operation, go for it, but don't tell other men what they should do in this regard. There are many methods of birth control, and sterilization has a finality to it.
Not to sound like a broken record here on CD, but I think it is important to distinguish between Toxin and Endocrine Disrupting Chemical. Toxins kill cells. Endocrine Disrupting Chemicals alter development. And since BPA and phthalates act like estrogen, these are chemicals that feminize most animals, from mammals all the way down to invertebrates.
I will leave it as an exercise for the reader to figure out for themselves what segment of the human population could be described as feminized. But if you're stumped, the answer is at:
http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=90247842
I have had endometriosis for 5+ years now, and am only now hearing how outside factors affect it. It doesn't get the press it should, and therefore, those of us who are most affected by it are not getting the info we need to make informed decisions and choices. Keep the articles coming.
This may be the most important article posted today. Can there be anyone more helpless than an unborn fetus in uttero? Good suggestions and practical advice that anyone can begin to act on.
In addition to the standard prenatal supplements take extra folic acid supplements prior to becoming pregnant.
"Many cleaning products have hormone disrupting properties, and common weed killers have been linked to lower sperm counts."
Maybe this isn't such a bad thing. I just finished commenting on another CD article, this one on overpopulation. As long as we men insist on not getting vasectomies and pumping out tons of kids to suit our outdated notions of masculinity, then maybe we "need" these sorts of disruptions.
Interesting, isn't it, how our stupidity eventually provokes the creation of its own antidote?
Is goes back a long way before the 1990's and it touches everything on earth. Kind of high price for progress.