Common Dreams NewsCenter

Net Roots Nation

 
     
Home | Newswire | Contacting Us | About Us | Donate | Sign-Up | Archives
   
 
     
 

Discuss this story Discuss this story Print This Post Print This Post E-Mail This Article
 
 

Sadr City Residents Fear A Cease-Fire Means More Violence

by Leila Fadel

BAGHDAD - One day after an agreement between followers of Shiite cleric Muqtada al Sadr and the Iraqi government to end more than six weeks of fighting, the streets in parts of the vast Shiite slum of Sadr City were deserted, amidst signs of a battle. Wires snaked out of potholes and from underneath tires - signs of past or future roadside bombs; abandoned pickup trucks, destroyed by airstrikes, littered the streets, and bullets or shrapnel scarred the houses.0512 04 1

Hussein Abd Sakran walked three hours, holding up a white flag, to escape southeast Sadr City, where U.S. and Iraqi forces battled Sadr’s Mahdi Army militia, and took refuge inside the home of his brother-in-law, Raheem Abdul Hassan.

He arrived Saturday after most other residents had fled, in fear that the agreement that would allow Iraqi security Forces into the northeast district would bring more violence. It was a long route in order to get past the barricade the U.S. military is building to isolate the southern edge from the rest of the slum and avoid the gun battles in the southern parts of the area, he said.

Inside Abdul Hassan’s home, furnished with colorful rugs and flimsy mattresses, Sakran and his wife hoped for calm after weeks of bombardment and gun battles, but they feared the worst is yet to come.

“We just want peace,” Sakran’s wife, Suham Bresam, said, her eyes heavy from sleepless nights. “This agreement happened and I was up all night from the gunshots and strikes.”

Her home was in the middle of the fight on the edge of the district where U.S. forces are holed up in abandoned buildings and the Iraqi Army has set up checkpoints, and she hadn’t left it in weeks. A nearly completed wall built by the U.S. military isolates the area, and her modest dwelling is scarred by bullets and shrapnel.

When Sakran tried to buy fuel from a nearby gasoline station he never made it. A roadside bomb exploded nearby and a newly built concrete wall blocked his path. The Iraqi Army started shooting in every direction, and he returned home scared, packed up his family and used a white flag to show he meant no harm as he walked away from the southern part of the slum. There was an additional reason: Iraqi forces had warned residents to evacuate.

Nowhere in Sadr City is safe from an air strike, Bresam said, but Abdul Hassan’s home was safer than her own. At home, the Iraqi Army shoots erratically after a roadside bomb blast hit civilians, and when the Mahdi Army shoots rockets at U.S. aircraft, missiles rain on people’s homes.

“It’s just the civilians who get hurt,” she said.

Before the battle began in late March, the area was peaceful, save for the sectarian killings that often happened. Bresam could go to the market, and her husband could drive to and from work easily. But they lived in an atmosphere of intimidation. When women were beaten by the Mahdi Army in her neighborhood or Sunnis killed, they objected quietly and never challenged the militia.

Just three days earlier three men were killed, spy was written on their forehead and they were left in the street. “We can’t say anything,” she said. “They’ll accuse us of being with the Americans.”

But they also fear the Iraqi Army. Videos captured on cell phones are being sent as messages from person to person. Abdul Hassan pulled out his phone to show a public hanging of three men. They stood on police trucks with nooses around their necks as a crowd of people looked on and then the trucks were driven away and the men were hung. Another showed men shot by the Iraqi Security Forces and then burned. In the background Iraqi soldiers spoke.

“Don’t say in the name of God the most compassionate the most merciful. They are animals,” one soldier said.

It was unclear where the videos came from or when they were shot.

Abdul Hassan said the videos were shot in the southern cities of Karbala and Nassiriyah, and he worried that the same would happen in Sadr City if the Iraqi Army had free reign.

“We haven’t seen a solution that will give us peace,” he said. “We don’t want it to be like Karbala or Nassiriyah. We don’t want people executed in the streets.”

Nearby in northeast Sadr City, blocks of homes were empty and the usually crowded streets were abandoned. Only two homes still had families here, across from Sada, an open area where garbage and bodies shot by the Mahdi Army are dumped. Homes were destroyed by airstrikes and the Peshmerga, the Kurdish militia absorbed into the Iraqi army, were standing guard.

On Sunday the Sakrans changed their minds and returned home, hoping that things would quiet down, they could resume life and markets would reopen.

© 2008 McClatchy

These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • NewsVine
  • StumbleUpon
  • YahooMyWeb
  • Technorati
 

11 Comments so far

  1. ticonderoga May 12th, 2008 12:57 pm

    Bush and Cheny conned us into invading Iraq, by lying to us, manipulating us through our religion, and jacking up our paranoia and “patriotism.” Iraq did nothing to us. Most Iraqis want us to leave, but some want us to stay. The ones who want us to leave are fighting the ones who want us to stay. The ones who want us to leave, want to be able to sell Iraqi oil at a fair market price to anyone, including France and Germany and Russia, all of whom would be happy to help Iraq rebuild if the US wasn’t there. The ones who want us to stay are our puppets and are willing to sell Iraqi oil to us cheap.

    If we leave, the fighting will stop. If we leave, someone else will get the oil. We’re not going to leave.

    And that kid in the photo is missing an arm. Wright is right: if there is a God, the US is damned.

  2. blessthebeasts May 12th, 2008 4:03 pm

    Those little boys have seen far too much horror and violence in their young lives. Is their any doubt that they will grow up hating the United States?

  3. Earl Simmins May 12th, 2008 6:21 pm

    The Nips and Krauts both love us (It’s the Frogs ya’ gotta worry ’bout). Sometimes there is a need for genocide pick a side wipe out the other then buy em’ off. End of story.

  4. pontificatinpapa May 12th, 2008 7:29 pm

    OK, I’m not going to belabor the whole Bush/Cheney thing and how and why we shouldn’t be there,etc.

    Rather than that, let’s just “cut to the chase”. Key words starting off a few paragraphs down in this article; “Before the battle began in March, the area was peaceful”. My interpretation of “area” is that which the article is mainly concerned, the Sadr City section of Baghdad.

    Undoubtedly, the battle that the writer refers to is the assault on Basra which Prime Minister al-Maliki personally led on March 25 and then spread to Sadr City.

    For those of you who have been paying attention (and I hope taking notes cause there may be a test later) recall that while all through that week U. S. officials were denying any knowledge of it.

    It was either Sat. or Sun., 3/28 or 29, when U. S. got into the melee with air power support. Almost immediately, al-Sadr ordered his Mahdi Army to lay down their arms.

    Since that time, this was the first that I have seen mention of the Iraqi Army (that being government military forces) in print. All the coverage has centered on U. S. troop involvement as well as air power (like almost destroying a hospital two Sundays ago)

    The news did not break until perhaps the first couple of days into April that al-Maliki had met with our General Patreaus & Ambassador Crocker on 3/21, the Friday before the assault took place. While Patreaus testifying before the Congress perhaps two weeks later called al-Maliki’s plans ill advised, he made no attempt whatsoever to intercede or dissuade him from doing so.

    There has naturally been speculation that this was the game plan engineered by Vice President Dick Cheney who was in Iraz in the middle of March; it was geared to allow al=Maliki to fall flat on his face (which he did) and then Patreaus could tell Congress that we could not withdraw any additional troops beyond bringing them to pre-surge levels.

    It all fits together just too smoothly.

    And while U. S. troops have been going far beyond the supposed train and support role they were to play, I wonder what kind of popcorn the Iraqi military was eating while watching the show on the sidelines; Orville Redenbacker?

    Al-Sadr has made it clear that he isn’t really interested in fighting al-Maliki’s forces; he just wants to drive the U. S. out of there.

    It’s called THE HANDWRITING ON THE WALL!

    CAN’T ANYBODY READ????

  5. medusa May 12th, 2008 11:25 pm

    Earl Simmins - Irony, right?

  6. ticonderoga May 13th, 2008 8:35 am

    We don’t have to read the writing on the wall. All we have to do is read the polls, in which the majority of Iraqis have said they want us to leave Iraq. No guesswork involved. They don’t want us there. Simple.

  7. greatbear215 May 13th, 2008 9:42 am

    This is how the US is helping Iraq? Disgraceful!

  8. elmysterio May 13th, 2008 6:15 pm

    Now that the ‘Iraqi Security Forces’ are now ‘in charge’ of keeping the ‘peace’ in Sadr City, the ethnic cleansing can resume post-haste, now that those pesky militia types are gone.

  9. Treefrog May 14th, 2008 12:26 am

    A slightly different “no child left behind”.

  10. Mark Abram May 14th, 2008 1:42 am

    US troops are committing wholesale atrocities in Iraq and Afghanistan, meanwhile our “progressives” are worried about the genetic purity of their organic veggies.

  11. Treefrog May 14th, 2008 10:04 am

    I wonder if the two things are connected, you are what you eat.

Join the discussion:

You must be logged in to post a comment. If you haven't registered yet, click here to register. (It's quick, easy and free. And we won't give your email address to anyone.)

 
   FAIR USE NOTICE  
  This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
 
 
 
Common Dreams NewsCenter
A non-profit news service providing breaking news & views for the progressive community.
Home | Newswire | Contacting Us | About Us | Donate | Sign-Up | Archives

© Copyrighted 1997-2008
www.commondreams.org