Get News & Views Updates
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
The Prosecution of George W. Bush for Murder
There is direct evidence that President George W. Bush did not honorably lead this nation, but deliberately misled it into a war he wanted. Bush and his administration knowingly lied to Congress and to the American public -- lies that have cost the lives of more than 4,000 young American soldiers and close to $1 trillion.
A Monumental Lie
In his first nationally televised address on the Iraqi crisis on October 7, 2002, six days after receiving the National Intelligence Estimate (NIE), a classified CIA report, President Bush told millions of Americans the exact opposite of what the CIA was telling him -a monumental lie to the nation and the world.
On the evening of October 7, 2002, the very latest CIA intelligence was that Hussein was not an imminent threat to the U.S. This same information was delivered to the Bush administration as early as October 1, 2002, in the NIE, including input from the CIA and 15 other U.S. intelligence agencies. In addition, CIA director George Tenet briefed Bush in the Oval Office on the morning of October 7th.
According to the October 1, 2002 NIE, "Baghdad for now appears to be drawing a line short of conducting terrorist attacks with conventional or CBW [chemical and biological warfare] against the United States, fearing that exposure of Iraqi involvement would provide Washington a stronger case for making war." The report concluded that Hussein was not planning to use any weapons of mass destruction; further, Hussein would only use weapons of mass destruction he was believed to have if he were first attacked, that is, he would only use them in self-defense.
Preparing its declassified version of the NIE for Congress, which became known as the White Paper, the Bush administration edited the classified NIE document in ways that significantly changed its inference and meaning, making the threat seem imminent and ominous.
In the original NIE report, members of the U.S. intelligence community vigorously disagreed with the CIA's bloated and inaccurate conclusions. All such opposing commentary was eliminated from the declassified White Paper prepared for Congress and the American people.
The Manning Memo
On January 31, 2003, Bush met in the Oval Office with British Prime Minister Tony Blair. In a memo summarizing the meeting discussion, Blair's chief foreign policy advisor David Manning wrote that Bush and Blair expressed their doubts that any chemical, biological, or nuclear weapons would ever be found in Iraq, and that there was tension between Bush and Blair over finding some justification for the war that would be acceptable to other nations. Bush was so worried about the failure of the UN inspectors to find hard evidence against Hussein that he talked about three possible ways, Manning wrote, to "provoke a confrontation" with Hussein. One way, Bush said, was to fly "U2 reconnaissance aircraft with fighter cover over Iraq, [falsely] painted in UN colors. If Saddam fired on them, he would be in breach" of UN resolutions and that would justify war. Bush was calculating to create a war, not prevent one.
Denying Blix's Findings
Hans Blix, the United Nation's chief weapons inspector in Iraq, in his March 7, 2003, address to the UN Security Council, said that as of that date, less than 3 weeks before Bush invaded Iraq, that Iraq had capitulated to all demands for professional, no-notice weapons inspections all over Iraq and agreed to increased aerial surveillance by the U.S. over the "no-fly" zones. Iraq had directed the UN inspectors to sites where illicit weapons had been destroyed and had begun to demolish its Al Samoud 2 missiles, as requested by the UN. Blix added that "no evidence of proscribed activities have so far been found" by his inspectors and "no underground facilities for chemical or biological production or storage were found so far." He said that for his inspectors to absolutely confirm that Iraq had no weapons of mass destruction (WMD) "will not take years, nor weeks, but months."
Mohamed ElBaradei, the chief UN nuclear inspector in Iraq and director of the International Atomic Energy Agency, told the UN Security Council that, "we have to date found no evidence or plausible indication of the revival of a nuclear weapon program in Iraq."
The UN inspectors were making substantial progress and Hussein was giving them unlimited access. Why was Bush in such an incredible rush to go to war?
Hussein Disarms, so Bush ... Goes to War
When it became clear that the whole purpose of Bush's prewar campaign -- to get Hussein to disarm -- was being (or already had been) met, Bush and his people came up with a demand they had never once made before -- that Hussein resign and leave Iraq. On March 17, 2003, Bush said in a speech to the nation that, "Saddam Hussein and his sons must leave Iraq within 48 hours. Their refusal to do so will result in military conflict." Military conflict -- the lives of thousands of young Americans on the line -- because Bush trumped up a new line in the sand?
The Niger Allegation
One of the most notorious instances of the Bush administration using thoroughly discredited information to frighten the American public was the 16 words in Bush's January 28, 2003 State of the Union speech: "The British government has learned that Saddam Hussein recently sought significant quantities of uranium from Africa." The Niger allegation was false, and the Bush administration knew it was false.
Joseph C. Wilson IV, the former ambassador to Iraq, was sent to Niger by the CIA in February 2002 to investigate a supposed memo that documented the sale of uranium yellowcake (a form of lightly processed ore) to Iraq by Niger in the late 1990s. Wilson reported back to the CIA that it was "highly doubtful" such a transaction had ever taken place.
On March 7, 2003, Mohamed ElBaradei told the UN Security Council that "based on thorough analysis" his agency concluded that the "documents which formed the basis for the report of recent uranium transactions between Iraq and Niger are in fact not authentic." Indeed, author Craig Unger uncovered at least 14 instances prior to the 2003 State of the Union address in which analysts at the CIA, the State Department, or other government agencies that had examined the Niger documents "raised serious doubts about their legitimacy -- only to be rebuffed by Bush administration officials who wanted to use them."
On October 5 and 6, 2002, the CIA sent memos to the National Security Council, National Security Advisor Condoleezza Rice, and to the White House Situation Room stating that the Niger information was no good.
On January 24, 2003, four days before the president's State of the Union address, the CIA's National Intelligence Council, which oversees all federal agencies that deal with intelligence, sent a memo to the White House stating that "the Niger story is baseless and should be laid to rest."
The 9/11 Lie
The Bush administration put undue pressure on U.S. intelligence agencies to provide it with conclusions that would help them in their quest for war. Bush's former counterterrorism chief, Richard Clarke, said that on September 12, 2001, one day after 9/11, "The President in a very intimidating way left us -- me and my staff -- with the clear indication that he wanted us to come back with the word that there was an Iraqi hand behind 9/11."
Bush said on October 7, 2002, "We know that Iraq and the Al Qaeda terrorist network share a common enemy -- the United States of America. We know that Iraq and Al Qaeda have had high level contacts that go back a decade," and that "Iraq has trained Al Qaeda members in bomb-making and poisons and deadly gasses." Of Hussein, he said on November 1, 2002, "We know he's got ties with Al Qaeda."
Even after Bush admitted on September 17, 2003, that he had "no evidence" that Saddam Hussein was involved with 9/11, he audaciously continued, in the months and years that followed, to clearly suggest, without stating it outright, that Hussein was involved in 9/11.
On March 20, 2006, Bush said, "I was very careful never to say that Saddam Hussein ordered the attack on America."
Vincent Bugliosi received his law degree in 1964. In his career at the L.A. County District Attorney's office, he successfully prosecuted 105 out of 106 felony jury trials, including 21 murder convictions without a single loss. His most famous trial, the Charles Manson case, became the basis of his classic, Helter Skelter, the biggest selling true-crime book in publishing history. The Prosecution of George W. Bush For Murder is available May 27.
For more information visit www.prosecutionofbush.com
Comments
Note: Disqus 2012 is best viewed on an up to date browser. Click here for information. Instructions for how to sign up to comment can be viewed here. Our Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines. Note to Readers: Spam Filter May Capture Legitimate Comments...

143 Comments so far
Show AllI want to join in giving my good and optimistic opinion of the "bandanna revolution" in which we all wear bandannas to identify ourselves with the Earth Community and so that we can recognize each other in public. It is an excellent idea, and one that has occurred to me independently too, although I had not settled on what sort of public symbol we should wear; the bandanna idea ends my thinking on this question.
What is the color and style of the bandanna? ( I will offer that our bandanna has two n's, not one. )
The bandanna is analogous to long hair forty years ago. In the mid to late sixties, long hair was so outrageous and so bold - you could not find a job, for example, if you wore long hair - that encountering someone in public who also had long hair meant instant friendship. That is what we need today.
This is such an excellent idea that it needs to be repeated in other posts. I'm going to copy my comment here and try to renew the discussion in more recent commentaries as this one I see is now passing into oblivion.
My dictionary shows that either spelling of bandana - one n or two - is correct, so I withdraw my earlier remark about spelling; one n is better anyway - simpler.
I was also thinking of maybe translating the word into Spanish, and I thought of the word bandera, as in the Puerto Rican national anthem ( " que bonita bandera..." ) but this is Spanish for flag, not quite right. I don't know the Spanish translation of bandana.
Anyway, it's a great idea and I hope that we can develop it and encourage widespread use.
Please add to this discussion. I think its important.
Gahwar,
I think you'll enjoy this.
I've been working on this bandana idea for about three weeks now and it seems to be catching on. What was so awe inspiring was the following response to one of my first posts on it from another commenter. Here is most of it.
Please read and enjoy. It gave me the inspiration not to give up on the idea even if it took awhile.
"From Estabandido Common Dreams April 21, 2008
Yes, bandanas!! I been wearin' one for years anyway. They are the all-around earth-lover's protection, wipe, tool, and symbol of the wild and free, the untrammeled, the lover of natural and left-alone corners, a shade to eyes so damn tired of peering out into the carnage and insanity… So let's try bandanas! Let everyone use those colors they most appreciate, let the symbolism of color enliven this hopeless task, a task nevertheless (exactly like the bodhisattva's to "aid in the illumination of all sentient beings"…) completely necessary if our pitiful species is to survive this century….......
Amazing isn't it?
OOPS.......sorry ghawar....not gahwar.....
I continue to be amazed at both the willingness of the Bush Administration to deliberately lie to us and the assumption we are bone headed stupid.
Bush's spokesmen now claim that the "Mission Accomplished" banner under which he declared victory in Iraq five years ago was not "his" banner. It is general knowledge they actually turned an entire carrier fleet around just so that the near shoreline would not be visible in tv shots. They staged a carrier jet landing with Bush strutting out in warrior costume. And, they chose precisely where the podium and all the photographers would be placed.
To suggest now that the horrendously wrong sign and its wording were not with their full participation defies credibility.
Of course, since one out of three people in this country apparently still believe those pathological liars in the White House who seem to lie even about things that would not harm them, well, maybe the Bush Administration is right on one thing. We do seem to be bone headed stupid.
Waiting For The Signal
These pages that bring us together
are the fire in the cave above the stream,
a dream we move in and out of, faceless,
expendable, waiting for a burst of wings
to spill our pooled bones like coins
over the chilled and silent ground
we fell in love with so long ago,
singing the green hills homeward
under that shovel-shouldered sun.
Fatigue works grim the stone of souls.
No talk is needed to believe the bleeding
will be ours all too soon. Needled dust,
that settled itself in naive lungs, cuts
with each rasp, yet the bleeding
won't be stemmed. Quick, black tongues
flick from windows, floors below pancaking
slabs, and the Street slumps with peanuts
beside its beer, locked on the game.
In our rush of voices a stream curses
the murmur of pines. In our names,
what we begged for never to be done,
is done with no shame. And the day
drags its blindered self to toil. Night trades
whiskey pete for oil, while down slope,
death-drummer birds with blazing eyes
ascend the holy crags to kill dissent
before we waking innocent arise.
rockpicker
12/10/05
I tied my royal blue bandana to my yellow purse, and I'm feeling all rebellious, and slightly empowered that I can at least make a statement, and maybe others will too. If anyone has put this nicely into words (what it stands for etc.) and can e-mail it to me, I will start getting it sent around (around the Twin Cities area, anyway). My e-mail is my screen name + @yahoo.com.
Great comments and many calls to ACTION by Posters. One early to post provided his e-mail who is ready to lead: bentaurus@hotmail.com. Lets get going on this and not just talk! It is a chance to make a real difference.
civil behavior - thank you for your reply. i missed that discussion on 4/21.
I think there is enough discontent and possibly even the beginnings of enough understanding of our predicament for a movement of real substance and visibility to soon develop. The unifying powers of a recognizable symbol will work wonders in this atmosphere - if we can pull it off.
As for color - I see it's to be a free-for-all. Okay. As for the message - we have to keep away from negatives and stick with positives; I like, for example, "Earth Community" as discussed above. I'm all into this, until it flops, which hope it won't. Bravo for a great idea!
Oh, and of course I'll be keeping an eye out now for a colorful hemp bandera that I will wear everywhere as soon as I see it. the right one.
lawlessone May 10th, 2008 2:28 pm
"I continue to be amazed at both the willingness of the Bush Administration to deliberately lie to us and the assumption we are bone headed stupid."
Bush is not bothered by his lies because he knows that those of us who can see through them are outnumbered. I used to think that, caught in a lie, he would be shamed and be forced to recant. No.
His attitude is - So what if we know better? He has at his disposal one hundred million American morons who believe him, and while we may be educated and skilled in communication, his one-hundred million true believers outnumber us, and many of them are armed and authorized to protect the empire from truth and reality.
CIVIL BEHAVIOUR/GHAWAR/NOTB4NOW969 ET AL
'earth community' seems like a good message. and as a theme song i would like to suggest david bowie's 'space oddity'. he wrote the song by being inspired by kubrick's 'space odyssey' in 69 and it was broadcast during the moon landing transmission programme in the u.k. revoluntionary at the time and exactly what we need now. and in the absence of new ideas, let's use one that has been proven to be effective. see it at:
www.youtube.com/watch?v=uhSYbRiYwTY
it's a classic..................along with 'imagine' by john lennon.
I am scared of the future of this country. I am glad I don't have children. I am thinking of moving to Canada. Like so many of my friends have.
I like Father Mulkahy's war song (from Mash) as a theme song also.
"There's no one singing war songs now like people used to do,
No "Over There," no "Praise the Lord," no "Glory Hallelu."
Perhaps at last we've asked ourselves what we should have asked before,With the pain and death this madness brings, what were we ever singing for?"
castlecoalition.org it explains how to become as powerful as a multinational. To join millions of Americans into the Coalition of Americans trying George W. Bush, et al. for murder, war crimes, etc. is the power back to the people. Coalitions - we're forming ours to save our water rights since eminent domain is rampant in the U.S. Millions, think about it for a minute, in a Coalition to bring Justice to the Criminals who have stolen America.
JDRMMR: Thinking of Canada...hmmm 50 million educated voters and their families trying to move to Canada? There might be room, health care is rational and moral. Sounds good better than fighting with knuckle heads here. I am sure that half of the supposed 49 million Bush voters would not vote for him if they were not duped by the media, maybe only 25 million hard core.
LC,
Did you take your medicine today?
Coco,
I love the song "imagine" Somehow as old as it is it sums up what we seem to be thirsting for.
I want to believe that somehow we have one last opportunity to change the world....for the better.
I am hoping we can let the bandana revolution take on a life of its own and "imagine" what we can do to stop this Empire and choose to build a new Earth community.
Time is limited. We best get working on it. At no other time in my 56 years have I seen such a need for urgency.
JDRMMR,
35 years ago I chose not to have children. I thought I would be bringing them into a world that would be fighting for water. Not far off.
I started being scared about four years ago. I realized what was in store. I finshed restoring this historic home we bought in 2003 in West Palm Beach. We have now have had our house for sale for close to two years. A beautiful little spot in the sun of West Palm Beach. I saw this coming but obviously not soon enough. It's been very difficult to stay ahead of the Empires plans to make my own.
We cannot go north to Canada (too cold) but have debated other places outside this country. Can't do anything unless we sell.
In the interim I have sworn to fight until I leave. As we used to say in the 60's "Power to the People!" I think it's time to revive a few good ways and times the best way we can.
The bandana is the way I can see who is willing to join the fight.
It would be easier to make a voluntary manslaughter case for the dozens of prisoners tortured to death by US officials. Bush authorized techniques that have long been clearly recognized as unlawful in the US and around the world, and he created a system so brutal that it resulted in deaths of detainees, some of them demonstrably innocent. Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld, Rice, Powell, Ashcroft and Tenet are also implicated and should be investigated, indicted, tried and convicted.
gw has two personalities. One the buffoon a failure at everything he attempted; school, military, several businesses that daddy financed. The other, a ruthless, cruel, lazy bum alcoholic schidso who surrounds himself with like minded who will make jokes on national t.v. about breaking the law big time.Thinks nothing of attacking a country illegally that causes millions of deaths while publicly coddling family members with wealthy excess.
Also the worst liar ever.
Those 16 words:
"The British government has learned that Saddam Hussein recently sought significant quantities of uranium from Africa."
Bush is such a moron, and not only did he have the look of a mass murderer when uttering that infamous lie, but his speech writers coud not use the name of the country, Niger, for fear he would butcher the pronounciation on national television. Pronouncing "significant" with the silent "g" was difficult enough.
Can anyone provide for me e-mail addresses of more anti-Bush sympathetic groups, organizations, individuals? This would be a great help! bentaurus@hotmail.com
AlexLawyer, I appreciate your comments. I have always said that impeachment or trial by the international criminal court--either one would be fine by me. America has revealed her fatal weakness because we have refused to stand up to this president and his policies and a great many of our own congressional leaders have been complicit. Bush, as I understand it, rather purposefully distanced America from the International Criminal Court which to me shows that he (or his handlers) understood that he was going to be doing things that would subject him to international censure. America has systematically undermined the United Nations and while the ICC is not part of the UN, they are connected.
Given the lassitude of the American Congress how can Americans who care about this issue effectively call for much needed intervention and commentary from the International Criminal Court?
Wouldn't it be great if we had freedom of the media instead of Rupert Murdock and more people had time to spare from trying to keep up with their credit card payments to think about what is going on?
It would indeed be sweet to hear the truth and see evil doers forced to hear it too.
By the way where do you all live? If I display a red bandanna around here I will be asking for trouble from all the enemies of the Bloods. Blue would align me with the Crips, green with the Lime street faction etc... I would like to show my solidarity with the movement but bandannas are already being used by street gangs.
By the way what about the "private contractors" who have lost their lives in this Iraq mess? No one ever talks about them.
Readers here will recall that I've been saying all this on my own website (said a great deal of it here, too), for literally years. The fact is that like prosecution of federal employees for crimes (murders) like Ruby Ridge, Waco, Ken Trentadue, Amadou Diallo, Sal Culosi, Sean Bell, and literally hundreds more, there will be no prosecution of George W. Bush for what is among the worst crimes in history - this nation or the world. My own lawsuit - the third, actually - has just been effectively ignored (after a year and a half, the court finally responded with a list of utterly false assertions concerning the complaint). Come on folks, talk is cheap. Look up Flast v. Cohen, then ask yourselves why people go on paying federal taxes. Good luck to Mr. Bugliosi - the book should sell like hot cakes. Just like Barbara Walters latest - and for pretty much the same reasons.
"…how the hell are we going to turn this Mad March to the Cosmic Sea of Dark Matter around…?"
Answer: Amendment X - that is to say, we must recognize and grow beyond the founding concept that the 3 branches of Government and their relative separation of powers are endowed with all the authority and all domain over all matters germane to the human race and the eternal future of humankind. The understanding and provision for this was specifically and succinctly preserved for us in the Constitution's Bill of Rights – and it can't be any more American or patriotic than this:
" The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people. "
1) Create and administer a publicly owned fund and community trust to equitably preserve, manage and promote public wealth (not money or coin – but which could have the effect of competing effectively with the privately owned fed. and other self-serving private money markets, such as insurers – whose profit and wealth is inequitably gained through the fruits and labors of the working class - i.e., double unto her her deeds…)
2) Provide for a council of elders (nonpartisan, non-appointed by Congress or Executive, selectable by common consent based on an Individual Life Work and/or social interest apart from politics - such as teachers, philosophers, researchers, humanitarians) to serve as an advisory authority, directed to act in the interest of the planet and for the future of the human race, rather than for expedient and/or immediate corporate self-interests – a dept. of the future perhaps, but not under the authority of an existing government branch.
3) Adopt and endow a fourth sentient sovereign functional arm of government (thus creating a more solid equitable 4-square system of checks and balances) that is charged with assuring and promoting the ideas as set forth in the Declaration of Independence; to identify, enumerate, preserve and promote unalienable rights, to identify and champion legislation and judicial enforcement as necessary to guard against and reconcile grievances accordingly, to promote the general welfare, with the power to accept and submit public referendums for legislative and judicial consideration, to help preserve the integrity of checks and balances with full access and oversight of all government activity, to check national security and covert intelligence interests, to freely create and distribute press and public media uninfluenced and free from corporate and commercial interests, to administer public resources, to freely provide objective campaign information and to monitor elections, etc.; to act in stead and on behalf of the balance of power between public, private and power interests, without undue influence of special interest.
Simply stated - it is self-limiting to hold that the full scope and balance of all power lies entirely within the scope of the constitutional authority given to any one or several of the current branches of government. That is, indeed, the very reason for the provision and existence of Amendment X in the Bill of Rights (emphasis on Rights). Which thus, establishes both the opportunity and purpose for such a unifying guardian body of authority to manifest - in order to secure a firm foundation for the forward ideals laid forth by the founding fathers, and as necessary to assure the Constitution serves onward as an essential living evolving instrument for public good – to secure Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness for all - to provide new guards for future well being - to strive forever to form a more perfect union, and to secure the blessings of liberty for posterity.
We can leave it to God, or as he would will we do for ourselves - to evolve society and government as from time to time becomes necessary in the course of human events.
Mens sana in corpore sano.
Mustard Seed
The fact that Henry Kissinger is still running around grunting and snorting his gibberish proves that war criminals are not indicted and prosecuted in the US. When I designed and built blast furnaces for melting metal and casting objects (which was fun), I ran propane tanks at full blast in a 6 inch thick high temp refractory walled 55 gallon drum....it two hours I could not melt steel and I ran out of propane. Anyone who says the fires from the planes and their 'impact on the building caused severe structural damage' don't know shit from shinola....nor do they know how powerful simple wind blowing against such a huge structure is. The planes were nothing, the fires were nothing....but the explosives....that was something.
War crimes and crimes against humanity is what the GOP and and WH has actively engaged in for seven years now. Fortunately for them, the brainwashed minds of republican voters from decades of propaganda issued from the GOP makes it impossible to differentiate between the ringing of the bell and their salivating thinking they are getting 'conservative' healthy food and the fact that they have become essentially Pavlov's dogs......but even with Pavlov's dogs, the torrential rains and subsequent flooding of his laboratories in Russia immediately extinguished the conditioning of the brainwashed minds of his dogs due to the trauma of the floods. So it will be with the so-called 'conservative' voters when the economic flood of almost 40 years of horrific economic policy finally hits everyone square in the eyes.
Unfortunately, Nixon's removal of the gold standard is the enabler of the globalist agenda which is the end game of the whole 9/11 and 'war on terror' scheme. 911 was just the Reichstag fire of the globalist/WTO/IMF mussolini corporatist thing they have going on...it will end the same way but only after much more suffering.
I thought you'd like to check out the political allegory of mine that I just found a literary agent for. It's a story set in the context of a teacher discussing with his class all of the evidence that the Bush administration is as corrupt as it is incompetent....and how to rectify the Constitutional crisis we face. It's couched in a discussion about the urgent need to stop abusing Mother Nature. I wrote in 3 dozen celebrities to play the students, so it's very funny despite how infuriating it is. You can read it at www.stoplittering.com/theswitch.htm and, yes, StopLittering.com is my site.
Not only Bush but also Pelosi and Reid must be indicted for war crimes and tried by the same tribunal prosecuting Bush & Cheney. Pelosi and Reid have both allowed and authorized Bush to continue his war by keeping its funding in a cynical ploy to extend Democratic majorities in congress in 2006 and 2008.
Before this happens, however, Pelosi and Reid must themselves be impeached for high crimes against the US Constitution, a constitution they have failed to uphold by, among several other violations, not impeaching Bush & Cheney, and not stopping an illegal occupation of a foreign country.
Rich Griffin, why not contact Bugliosi and ask him to step up to the plate? He is toward the end of career so he would not ruin a career by taking this on, he has a well known name.....after the election is prime time, won't be competing for media coverage--from November to the first week in January. Why Boston? Why not Philladelphia where the important documents were drafted, and the Liberty Bell resides?
Simo wrote:
"There is no "rule of law" in the USA. The law exists merely to control the masses, not the powerful. Bush and his allies are guilty of war crimes on a mass scale and Congress, for refusing to impeach and jail these murders, these traitors, are complicit in these crimes. Shame on Congress. Shame on America. One million Iraqis dead. Jesus Christ, what has this country become?"
What this country has become is ruled by psychopaths who are cunning enough to construct a "mask of sanity". These creatures have no conscience. No sense of empathy. Imagine doing whatever you think will get you what you want and nary a twinge to ever make you lose sleep over it. THAT is what we are dealing with. And what they want is total control over all resources and labour to utilize those resources for their personal benefit. We will be the unwashed masses that serve the elite. The pieces are being put into place, but we are currently mesmerized by the pieces. We are not seeing the larger picture. This is be design, of course. Our entire capitalist society favours, and rewards the traits considered to be psychopathic.
It's estimated that only 6% of the population may be considered essentially psychopathic. They can, however influence and sway another 12 to 16% of the population. 20% seems to be enough to corrupt a society's fabric. Notice any resemblance Bush's recent poll numbers? There's that 28% or so of true believers and /or conscience-less profiteers.
There's so much to be done to take back this world for the normal people, but the first thing is to educate yourself. All the marches and demonstrations won't do any good unless you truly KNOW YOUR ADVERSARY. You cannot cure what you don't understand.
Start with this link: http://www.ponerology.com
Then read Robert Hare's "Without Conscience"
Martha Stout's "The Sociopath Next Door"
Hervey Cleckely's "The Mask of Sanity" available as a free download here:
http://www.quantumfuture.net/store/downloads.php
Time is precious!
I have a major problem with the guy that wrote this. Being is that he went along with the miscarriage of justice called the Manson trial. Anyone who would claim justice was done in a trial where the jury was told the president says the defendant is guilty, does not make me feel I could trust them. As for his article on Bush I agree but unless this can be posted by a major world media source in America on a national scale it is meaningless. Since all major media is under complete control of the Bush crime family, this will just be a exciting song for the LIBERAL CHOIR.
"Any intelligent fool can make things bigger, more complex, and more violent. It takes a touch of genius -- and a lot of courage -- to move in the opposite direction."
Albert Einstein
One way of getting this message out beyond the liberal choir is to join a peace vigil with some of this information on a sign. My favorite peace vigil sign, which gets honks of approval from the general public driving by in Dover, New Hampshire, is:
"NO LIES
NO WAR"
That seems to rather succinctly summarize much of what is in this article and the comments. I invite people everywhere to take this message to their local peace vigils.
ClassAct May 9th, 2008 1:13 pm
How can you relate this great story about this Godzilla thing, which explains a lot, and then just leave us all hanging! Why should we believe this? What are your references??? Where/how did you find out about this? PLEASE EXPLAIN!!
Cheney/Bush World Tour 2009
01/20 - Crawford Texas
01/21 - the Hague
01/22 - Hell
LC May, as soon as you invoked Ted Kennedy, your post became a joke.
Yawn....
Sorry for the skepticism however, the time for talking has long passed. The question has been and will always be, when do WE as Americans take action?
Long post ahead, y'all have been warned... ;)
This is a great book, but you know, the thing I keep thinking is that I knew almost a DECADE ago just how bad George W. Bush was (and so did the people who would read this site in the first place, I expect.) But the specific reason why *I* knew this is that I investigated vote fraud in Tennessee in the 2000 election. When I first started doing this (in November 1999), I'll never forget how weird it felt; it was like I was the ONLY one who knew that something terrible was going on, and the people walking around on the street all around me just had no idea. Of course, I wasn't the only one who knew and wanted to find out more; the NAACP definitely wanted to know, which is why the Tennessee chapter held a huge meeting on the subject only a few days after the election to start recording information about the many, many, many allegations of voter disenfranchisement among African-Americans in our state. A press release was sent to all major papers in Tennessee-- well, guess who printed it? The Tennessee Tribune (the major African-American paper) and Urban Flavor (one of the alternative AA papers.) Everyone else, EVERY other news source, just ignored it. The Urban League was also quite interested in the subject, as was the SEIU and the local UAW chapter at the Saturn plant. American Progressive, American Liberal, and the scholarly journal Southern Exposure all printed articles because *I* wrote and sent them; ditto with Alternet (Bite the Ballot, one of my pieces, is still in the archives, actually.) Not that there's anything particularly special about me, but after the untold hours I put into this, all the abuse I received, all the threats I got including death threats with specific time, place, and weapon, some credit is always nice. :)
The general media was so inexcusably dismissive of the massive mountains of allegations of vote fraud that all favored George W. Bush that it still seems unbelievable. Nobody will ever know exactly what happened in that election, but the atmosphere of "who cares, Gore is a sore loser" presented and nurtured by the media is what helped to ensure the very fact that we'll never know. Honestly, that did nothing but foreshadow the way the media has treated anything related to Bush all along (obviously, this exempts a source like Common Dreams.) This is one of the things that Bugliosi does such a great job of pointing out. The American people aren't dumb. But it's very hard for the vast majority to see any other way of understanding things if EVERY single mainstream media source of any kind whatsoever-- and not even dragging in Rush and his ilk, either-- is saying one thing, presenting one point of view, and behaving as if no alternate POV could even exist.
So all in all, the only problem with the book, I think, is that I want him to give people like me and us more credit!!@ We knew what Bush was ALL ALONG, when everyone else was bleating how great he was. When Bush had a 90% approval rating, WE were the ten percent. When invading Afghanistan was approved by 94% of the American public, hey, guess who the 6% were... could it be US??? However, the main reason I thought that invasion was such a bad idea may or not be the same reason others had. I knew what an incompetent moron and loser Bush was, and I had absolutely no confidence that he'd do what he said he was going to do, which to capture Bin Laden. And he didn't. I thought he'd just end up going in there and making a mess that would come back to haunt us later. And he did.
However, the really interesting thing this book ends up getting across is that you don't have to be any kind of a liberal to realize just how bad Bush is. Conservative Republicans *should* be more horrified than anyone else; as Barry Goldwater correctly points out, the Bush cabal is made up of people who could hardly be further from a genuine definition of conservatism OR Republicanism. I suspect that few people would really 100% fit the definition of liberal, conservative, or mushy middle anyway. For example, I've known how bad Bush is for almost ten years, I don't think Reagan has turned into a saint just because he's dead, and I don't have anything good to say about any flavor of Republicanism at all. I'm a good old-fashioned bleeding heart liberal, but I'm also a very old-school Democrat, which means that I believe in FDR-style big government! :) And when it comes to law and order, to tell y'all the truth, I'm pretty much where Bugliosi himself is, which is mighty conservative indeed. I'm not an anarchist by any manner of means. I don't drink alcohol, smoke pot, or use drugs (except for Ritalin! Don't take away my Ritalin! ;) I'm a complicated mess of liberal and conservative and everything in-between, and I suspect that the same is true of all of us. So I can come together with you, and you, and you, and all of the individual you's that come together to make up America. If there is any one message to take from Bugliosi's book, it's that a people really can and should decide to do this.
Also, there's a very good reason why this book is FAR from old news. It's old news for US, because we've known all along. But look at how many people still have no idea about any of the facts presented in this book, and even how many STILL think that Bush is a good president!! We need to not forget this. But in time, things can and do turn around. Maybe the most interesting point Bugliosi makes in the entire book is that Pinochet was finally tried for his crimes in Chile fully THIRTY years after he committed them. We all know that nobody would try Bush for murder *now* or a year from now, but five, ten years from now... well, anything could happen. So let's all take heart! :)
I am glad someone is finally defining the deception and criminal culpability of Bush in this war; saying what many have thought for so long. If you have read any of Mr. Bugliosi's books you know that his clinical analysis of subjects is beyond compare. This book has been blacked out by the mainstream media; although he will be on C-SPAN2's bookTV Sunday July 13 at 4:15AM ET.
I'm not planning on moving to Canada. I'm already here. The problem is that the Conservative minority government here is led by a wannabe neocon, Stephen Harper (whom Bush refers to as "Steve" -- he's the only one who calls him Steve).
I've read Bugliosi's book, and have no doubt that Bush could be tried federally or by any state for the crime of murder. Bugliosi even goes through the cross-examination of Bush (Bush would look pretty guilty if he didn't take the stand in his own defense), an it's not pretty for Dubya. Just about anything he might say would back him into a corner.
Anyway, it's nice to know that I'm not the only person in the world who can see that the emperor has no clothes on. I think it's interesting that many people here see the JFK/RFK/MLK assassinations, the JFK Jr. crash/assassination, September 11 (I don't like to use 9/11 because it tends to trivialize the events), and the Afghan and Iraq wars as part of the same despicable chain of events--with the common thread of GHW Bush and his dysfunctional family, starting with Dubya's grandfather.
I'm also happy to see that Reagan worship doesn't seem to exist here. Ketchup for all!!
When do the Charges get filed? Why is it taking so long, everyone here has wanted this for 6-8 years! We have the video, e-mails, witnesses, crimes, and the truth but those who CAN won't. Could this be a Class Action? Can the People start this ball rolling? Where do we start. Where can we donate? Can The People hire Bugliosi? You all know we can't depend on the mealy-mouthed cowards in Congress. Well, what do you think Mr. Bugliosi? Will you take this on?
Bugliosi is mostly right, but 9/11 was not the first attack on American soil in American history. That honor should probably go to the Brits in the War of 1812, who brushed aside defenders quite as incompetent as our own Bush 2 crowd, took Washington, burned it to the ground, and hurt many Americans in the process. The president was James Madison. Congress soon investigated the incident, but carefully refrained from expressing any opinion or imputing any blame. What else is new? It's all in the book by Henry Adams, "History of the United States/1809-1817."
Here is the major problem with having to wait until G.W.Bush is out of office to be able to charge him for the crimes he has committed. If Bush believes there is a real chance that he will be arrested and charged with the crimes he has committed then he most likely will never leave office. We, the American people, have allowed him to get laws passed that makes it so easy for him to become dictator of this country and I have no doubt that is what he will do to prevent anyone from being able to arrest him for any thing.
So I warn you that if there is a really serious move to arrest and try Bush for the crimes he has committed he will not leave office and that will leave us with only one way to remove him from office and we are going to need the full support of our armed forces to be able to that. So the question is, Will the soldiers of our armed forces continue to support this corrupt government or will they support the people. Pray that we will support the people, but to be honest I doubt that they will.
This question was ask, "So, Mr. Bugliosi has laid out the case. When does the action come?" Here is the one word answer, "NEVER"