Common Dreams NewsCenter
National Conference for Media Reform
 
     
Home | Newswire | Contacting Us | About Us | Donate | Sign-Up | Archives
   
 
     
 

Discuss this story Discuss this story Print This Post Print This Post E-Mail This Article
 
 

After Hiatus, States Set Wave of Executions

by Ralph Blumenthal

HUNTSVILLE, Tex. - Here in the nation’s leading death-penalty state, and some of the 35 others with capital punishment, execution dockets are quickly filling up.0503 01 1

Less than three weeks after a United States Supreme Court ruling ended a seven-month moratorium on lethal injections, at least 14 execution dates have been set in six states between May 6 and October.

“The Supreme Court essentially blessed their way of doing things,” said Douglas A. Berman, a professor of law and a sentencing expert at Ohio State University. “So in some sense, they’re back from vacation and ready to go to work.”

Experts say the resumption of executions is likely to throw a strong new spotlight on the divisive national - and international - issue of capital punishment.

“When people confront a new wave of executions, they’ll be questioning not only how people are executed but whether people should be executed,” said James R. Acker, a historian of the death penalty and a criminal justice professor at the State University at Albany.

Texas leads the list with five people now set to die here in the Walls Unit, the state’s death house, between June 3 and Aug. 20. Virginia is next with four. Louisiana, Oklahoma and South Dakota have also set execution dates.

Some welcome the end of the moratorium.

“We’ll start playing a little bit of catch-up,” said William R. Hubbarth, a spokesman for Justice for All, a victims rights group based in Houston.

“It’s not like we have a cheering section for the death penalty.” Mr. Hubbarth said. But, he added: “The capital murderers set to be executed should be executed post-haste. It’s not about killing the inmate. It’s about imposing the penalty that 12 of his peers have assessed.”

More inmates whose appeals have expired are certain to be added to execution rosters soon, including, in all likelihood, Jack Harry Smith, who, at 70, is the oldest of the 360 men and 9 women on Texas’ death row (though hardly a row any more, but an entire compound). Mr. Smith has been under a death sentence for 30 years for a robbery killing at a grocery in the Houston area.

“If it’s my time to go, it’s my time to go,” said Mr. Smith, who maintains his innocence and was delivered by guards for a prison interview in a wheelchair.

So far, at least nine others elsewhere, including Antoinette Frank, a former police officer convicted of a murderous robbery rampage in New Orleans, have been given new execution dates, according to the Death Penalty Information Center, an anti-capital punishment research group that puts the latest death row census at 3,263. Dozens more are likely to get execution dates in coming months, but most under death sentences have not exhausted their appeals.

Yet public support for capital punishment may be dwindling. Death sentences have been on the decline, and a poll last year by death penalty opponents found Americans losing confidence in the death penalty.

“There will be more executions than people have the stomach for, at least in many parts of the country,” said Stephen B. Bright, president of the Southern Center for Human Rights in Atlanta, a leading anti-death-penalty litigation clinic.

Last year, Texas accounted for 26 of the 42 executions nationwide. That includes the last two people executed before the Supreme Court signaled a moratorium on executions while considering whether the chemical formula used for lethal injection in Kentucky inflicted pain amounting to unconstitutionally cruel and unusual punishment. The justices ruled 7 to 2 on April 16 that it did not, while allowing for possible future challenges.

But the scheduling of executions comes as prosecutors and juries have been turning away from the death penalty, often in favor of life sentences without parole, now an option in every death-penalty state but New Mexico.

According to the Death Penalty Information Center, death sentences nationwide rose from 137 in 1977, peaked at 326 in 1995 and fell steadily to 110 last year.

“We’re seeing a huge drop-off,” said Mr. Bright, attributing the decline to the time and trouble of imposing death sentences, and a recent wave of exonerations after DNA tests proved wrongful conviction.

Close to 35 people have been cleared in Texas alone, including, just days ago, James L. Woodard, who spent more than 27 years in prison for a 1980 murder he did not commit.

The first inmate now set for execution is William E. Lynd, 53, on Tuesday in Georgia. Mr. Lind was convicted of shooting his girlfriend, Ginger Moore, in the face during an argument in 1988, shooting her again as she clung to life, and a third time, fatally, as she struggled in the trunk of his car. After burying her, he attacked and killed another woman he had stopped on the road.

With two other executions pending but not yet scheduled in Georgia, the state seeks “clearance of the backlog,” said Russ Willard, a spokesman for Attorney General Thurbert E. Baker. “We will work our way though the system at a much more rapid pace than we would have.”

Virginia - which has executed 98 people since 1976, second only to Texas, with 405 - has the next scheduled execution: May 27, for Kevin Green, 30, for the 1998 slayings of Patricia and Lawrence Vaughn in their convenience store in Dolphin. Three other Virginia inmates also have been given dates in June and July.

Louisiana has set a July 15 execution date for two inmates, including the former police officer, Ms. Frank, 30. She was convicted of killing a fellow officer, Ronald Williams, and two Vietnamese workers, Ha Vu and her brother, Cuong Vong, at their family’s restaurant in New Orleans during a robbery in 1995.

But appeals may delay her execution and that of the second inmate Darrell Robinson, convicted of killing four people.

South Dakota, which has recorded only 15 executions since 1889, set a week’s window of Oct. 7-13 for the execution of Briley Piper, 25. He pleaded guilty to the torture murder of Chester Allan Pogue, 19, who was forced to drink hydrochloric acid and then stabbed and bludgeoned to death in 2000. One accomplice was executed last year and another is serving life without parole.

The first Texas inmate now re-scheduled for death, on June 3, is Derrick Sonnier, 40, convicted of stalking, stabbing and strangling a young mother, Melody Flowers, and her baby son in Humble, north of Houston, in 1991.

Mr. Sonnier, who turned down a request this week for an interview, had forbidden his trial lawyer from calling family members as mitigating witnesses, costing him a chance for life in prison without parole, said his appellate lawyer, Jani Maselli.

In another of the five latest scheduled Texas executions, a July 22 date was set for Lester Bower, 60, convicted of killing a former police officer and three other men near Sherman in 1983.

Mr. Smith, the oldest death row inmate, lost his Supreme Court appeal in February and said he was resigned to an execution date soon as well.

“I’d hate to go before my time,” he said, a gaunt figure seated in a wheelchair and speaking by phone behind glass in the Polunsky Unit in Livingston, Tex., where the condemned are housed until the day they are driven to Huntsville to die.

Asked if the prospect of an end to his confinement came as any relief, he said, “In a way it does.”

“Death is death,” Mr. Smith said. “If they stick a needle in your arm or shoot you in the head, it’s cruel and inhuman punishment, taking a human life.”

Yet, he said, “a life sentence is a whole lot worse - it’s torture.”

© 2008 The New York Times

These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • NewsVine
  • StumbleUpon
  • YahooMyWeb
  • Technorati
 

66 Comments so far

  1. KEM PATRICK May 3rd, 2008 2:06 pm

    I’ve posted a similar comment here on another thread two weeks ago, but will post it again. That’s what we bloggers do here, ____ post opinions.

    For a few moments, put yourself in this scenerio:

    You are seated with your mate in a small and very quiet semi-darkened room. In front of your nicely padded theatre type chairs is a large, thick plate glass window, which overlooks a pure white room, where three mem, dressed in hospital scrubs are placing needles into your only sons arm veins. One of the three men is an MD. It has to be done correctly, humainly and with decency and respect.

    Your son turns his head and stares at the window, your only son cannot see you, but he knows you are there. His eyes are filled with tears. He is being executed, or in his mind murdered, for a crime he never committed.

    Unfortunantly a fair and honest jury of his peers found him guilty. The only two in the world who know with absolute certanty he is innocent, is your son and the man who murdered the innocent child he was convicted of killing. After lengthy trial arguments and testimony given by experts, DNA evidence was “proven” to be less than 100% accurate and an “eye witness” testified for the prosecution.

    And that in my opinion is why the death penalty shouid be abolished. ___ We all know there are people who are not fit to live in any human or animal society. There is no question that if someone raped and murdered one of our children, we may wish that person to die,___ in any manner, cruel or not.

    Many on death rows deserve whatever punishment that could be given. But SOME on death rows are innocent. We cannot honestly justify an opinion, that some are guilty for ‘certain’ and deserve the death penalty and therefore the death penalty sentence is justified.

    For what about the son described in the above illustration. He was “guilty” for ‘certain’, otherwise he wouldn’t be lying on a cold gurney in a death chamber with poison flowing into his veins. He nor anyone else, will ever be able to prove his innocence.

  2. Poet May 3rd, 2008 2:07 pm

    the dilemma of what to do with vicious criminals who deliberately take the lives of others without society degrading itself to their level of violence is so simple.

    It’s called exile. We find some island a thousand miles from anywhere, drop them off with food and the most basic of provisions, post a guard patrol to make sure they stay there and voila–problem solved.

    They will either turn their collective lives around or die (or maybe kill each other off) trying. It’s cheaper than death row and more humane than any kind of execution.

  3. militantlibrarian May 3rd, 2008 2:29 pm

    Back in the 30’s my grandfather, a small-town Kentucky lawyer, defended a black man who had been accused by a white woman of raping her. My grandfather lost the case. There was a hanging, which went wrong because the hangman tied the knot incorrectly. So he strangled to death for endless minutes.

    My grandfather appealed the case on the grounds that the jury was improperly selected — it consisted of a bunch of guys who sat around the courthouse steps and were summoned to jury duty by the sheriff. The appeals court said it was quite ok, even though the woman had received a medical exam which found her to be a virgin. On her death bed, she confessed she had made it all up.

    As a highly sensitive and imaginative child, I was obsessed with the photos my father had of the hanging. A man climbing up to the gallows with a black hood over his head. I kept imagining what it must have been like to experience such a death, knowing you didn’t do anything wrong except walk through a field by a white woman’s house.

    This is how “To Kill a Mockingbird” really ended.

  4. Words Are Important May 3rd, 2008 2:42 pm

    Ask the last innocent person who was executed what they think about the death penalty and justice.

    Obama, Hillary, and McCain all suuport the death penalty.

    Ralph Nader does not.

    Q: Isn’t the death penalty really a states’ rights issue?

    Ralph Nader: Well, it used to be, but now there are numerous federal crimes which provide for the death penalty, that’s a recent development. And a president, I think, should take a strong stand. The death penalty has been shown, in study after study, not to deter homicides; it has been shown to be discriminatorily applied to the poor and the defenseless, especially defendants who don’t have lawyers who stay awake at trial.

    Source: CNN: “Burden of Proof” Aug 9, 2000

  5. Galen May 3rd, 2008 3:13 pm

    When Bush was governor of Texas, he executed more people than all the other governors of Texas combined.

    Also, Bush and his ENTIRE EXECUTIVE COUNCIL have condoned and AUTHORIZED the use of TORTURE!

    So now we are supposed to be weepy-eyed with shock when the Great Murder Machine (aka the US of A) is revving up to consume more potentially innocent victims?

    Give me a break.

    The US is in the same noble moral company with Saudi Arabia and Iran.

    Moral certainty + Executive empowered violence = Tyranny.

    Get used to it. (It’s all you have left…)

  6. BobBeaSea May 3rd, 2008 3:44 pm

    I understand capital punishment is quite in vogue in parts of the U.S. and the “time out” is over. Perhaps the day will come again when the U.S. joins the rest of Western civilized society and bans capital punishment - permanently. In the meantime it must be reassuring for the U.S. to be in good company with China, Iran, Saudi Arabia, Myanmar and a host of other modern societies practising this barbaric and archaic ritual.

    It is however the business of the U.S. and her people so I’ll leave it at that. Someday perhaps……

    BTW, whenever did the notion of “satisfying the needs” of the victims come into play in the administration of justice? Or is it a throwback to Old Testament justice?

  7. Bane Richter May 3rd, 2008 3:53 pm

    No getting in the way of what some of the people want. Scalia has it well thought out, for example. While the debate is long over and barbarism can be done away with… the Death Penalty is profitable too.

  8. annabelle May 3rd, 2008 3:55 pm

    It appears that whatever W wants the Supreme Court obeys. They seem to be one and the same. There used to be three branches of government, now we have The Executive Branch, the Judiciary Branch and two thirds of the Legislative Branch against one third of the Legislative Branch. Something is very wrong with this picture. These are odds that hurt a lot of innocent people and not just the innocent persons on death row. These odds do not favor a government of the people, for the people and by the people.

  9. Ghawar May 3rd, 2008 3:59 pm

    People convicted of capital crimes should be placed on rocket boosters with a hundred dollars and fired at earth escape velocity into outer space. Out of sight, out of mind.

  10. whatfools May 3rd, 2008 4:13 pm

    I have already asked my governor not to restart this very expensive form of vengence.

  11. Nietzsche May 3rd, 2008 4:55 pm

    I haven’t heard George say lately that history will vindicate his policies. Maybe he doesn’t believe it any more. He probably never did. He probably has always had a God complex over his ability to create death, pestilence, famine, and war on an ever-more grand scale.

    The poor are being starved, anyone unfortunate to fall into the hands of the justice system loses all their rights immediately, the plagues of Egypt were nothing compared to bio-engineering, and The White House is desperate to start another war in Iran.

    Vlad the Impaler was a saint compared to George.

  12. wcdevins May 3rd, 2008 5:24 pm

    Can’t we get Musharraf to fire OUR supreme court? I’d get behind that.

  13. USAn May 3rd, 2008 5:26 pm

    Somehow, other nations’s societies do just fine simply imprisoning, often rehabilitating and even eventually releasing, people who commit murder.

    Where does this hyper-emotional, backward, vengeance-based morality of typical Americans come from?

  14. USAn May 3rd, 2008 5:30 pm

    Might the typical American love of executions, it’s love of committing murder and violence, and it’s love of imperialist war, all spring form the same dark source within it’s society?

  15. wcdevins May 3rd, 2008 5:32 pm

    It comes from the bible, USAn - a hyper-emotional, backward, vengeance-based moralization - an eye for an eye. It certainly does not come from Christ the forgiver, the supposed personal saviour of a many a death penalty advocate, including Gov George “stick ‘em horns” Bush the Lesser.

  16. Edward1793 May 3rd, 2008 5:32 pm

    Many studies have been done on life in prison vs. murder by the state.
    In all cases life in prison is cheaper that of murder.

    Our criminal justice sys. has completly abanoned the concept of “corrections” and replaced it with “retribution”

    They could eliminate the term “Corrections” in all facilities that incarcerate people. Maybe it could be named the “Punishment Division”

  17. Ghawar May 3rd, 2008 5:57 pm

    Yes, the question of capital punishment was once an issue in the U.S. and perhaps it still is. But it seems to me that the U.S. has deteriorated further and that capital punishment must now take second billing to torture. War, torture, execution, prison, “closure” - American preoccupations with violence, death and crudity are truly symptomatic of a diseased culture. An individual that behaved as the U.S. would be laced into a straight jacket; in the U.S. she would be executed!

    These crazy and violent national compulsions will culminate in global nuclear war. What else are the gigantic military budget and the 800 global bases for if not global war? What are Bush, McCain and the other war presidents for?

  18. Rob Roy May 3rd, 2008 6:32 pm

    Capital punishment is barbaric. Its proponents are no better than those who commit murder and light years worse than those who have been wrongly convicted.

    The USA: an enlightened country? I don’t think so.
    Apologies and bouquets to those States who have abolished this unspeakable evil.

  19. skippyagogo41 May 3rd, 2008 7:03 pm

    3,228
    According to the us gov’t that’s the number of people on death row at the end of 2006. 42 people were executed in 2007. If you were to execute them all in the next 5 years or so you’d have to kill about 650 each year; two a day. I suppose if you wanted to get rid of them quickly and didn’t care about what others might say about your country you might think about packing them off to an army test range and use artilary fire to kill them all.

    Then agian maybe we’d all be better off if the worst of them were locked in their cages until they died, then bury them behind prison walls. At least that way you’d be sure not to do unto others what you’d not like done unto yourself.

  20. oldguy May 3rd, 2008 7:13 pm

    Rubbing my hands together in obvious glee, I set to the delicious task of extending the list. Let’s see now…beginning with the worst offenders…#1 George, #2 Dick, #3 Paul, #4 Karl, #5 Donald…and the list goes on. It truly is a wonderful thing to finally have the joy of frying the serial killers. Justice has been 5 years in the making, but the supremies have finally seen the light. And oh, before we forget, let’s torture them first. You know; it has something to do with the goose and the gander…

  21. abbybwood May 3rd, 2008 8:58 pm

    Ron Paul is against the death penalty and always has been.

    Ron Paul is still running for POTUS as a Republican.

    Everyone I know is already planning to write in Ron Paul for POTUS on Election Day 2008.

    And I am planning to as well.

    This is just one reason why. Ron Paul is against the death penalty. Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton and John McCain all support the death penalty.

  22. WJM May 3rd, 2008 9:22 pm

    For the record, W, as governor of Texas, executed more people than any governor in the history of the country. No other person has been nearly as callous, as blood thristy, or as rude about it. He even went so far as to make fun of those he executed.

    According to the Innocence Project, about 11% of those on death row are actually innocent, and the project has been instruemntal in the releases of over 120 people from those death chambers. By those numbers, W, who executed 167 people as gov, killed 17 innocent people. He doesn’t care, either. He’s proud of being a murderer.And Alberto Gonzales was his advisor in these murders, who bragged that he never spent more than 30 minutes on any of them.

    We are the ONLY industrialized country that still has the death penalty. What has made us so bloodthristy when we supposedly are the best country in the world? We are among the lowest of the low, regardless of what we call ourselves. We murder people for killing others.

    If we didn’t have a for profit “justice” system, there would be no reason to clog every prison with those who have no business being in there, just so we can rob our next generations of their educations to build more prisons.

    This is what the republicans want, a society where 50% are in jail, and the rest are employed watching them. It’s their full employment plan. I’ve been watching them implement it for 2 1/2 decades, now, and I’m convinced that is what they want. There is really no other explaination.

  23. Little Brother May 3rd, 2008 9:33 pm

    Ah, the very fires of Hell blaze in exaltation at this news of progress!

    It is well, though– there are always a few hands sitting idle down at the Grim Reaper Union Hall who are glad for the work.

    And it makes sense considering the unwillingness or inability of Congress to extend unemployment benefits– no sense in letting perfectly good executioners starve to death! Time to put ‘em on the clock, and not a moment too soon!

    Why throw good money away after bad?

    ☠ ☠ ☠ ☠ ☠ ☠ ☠

  24. Elisabet May 3rd, 2008 9:33 pm

    unbelievable.

  25. hoytdouglas May 3rd, 2008 9:57 pm

    A person will die for murder most usually if the person murdered is not the “enemy.” The people bombed by air forces or navy forces or armed forces may have died because they were the “enemy.”

    The people of Hiroshima, most of whom were innocent non combatants, were murdered; likewise, the people of London, Berlin, Algeria, Rwanda, Moscow, Vietnam, Iraq, and maybe, soon, Iran.

    Most of the murders are free, well paid and respected. Yet, those murderers are cruel, promiscuous, evil people.

    So who deserves to die?

  26. mmmooo May 3rd, 2008 10:36 pm

    I might not mind so much, given that I live far away from you all - in Australia.

    But the poison that runs through the polity of your nation trickles down into our culture. It affects my view of the kind of world we live in.

    People are just animals, wit, with a little more intelligence and the capacity and practice of compassion, some with a lot more than others.

    It is a wild audacity for those people who constitute the Judiciary and a Legislature to presume that in their collective capacity as “the State” have some ethical mandate to take lives of other people, while forbidding citizens to do so.

    We do not teach that killing people is wrong, by killing people - or animals for that matter. Statistics show again and again that we do not deter people from it either. If anything, it is quite possible that the converse is true: that we teach that killing another is a discretion any of us possess, and that as long as we can evade sanction - it’s an option.

    This is what Shakespeare had to say on the matter:

    Man, Proud Man
    Dress’d in a little brief authority
    Most ignorant of What he’s most assured
    His Glassy Essence
    Like an Angry Ape Plays such fantastic tricks before high heaven
    As make the Angels weep.

  27. Progress May 3rd, 2008 10:55 pm

    The point of the death penalty is not to deter crime, its to PUNISH crime. If someone killed a family member of yours what would you do? It seems to me the biggest problem with the death penalty is that it is applied to innocent people sometimes. If anything, we should expand the death penalty to certain rapes and certainly to child molestation.

    To deal with the problem of innocent people being executed, why not relax the rules of evidence during a death penalty case? If someone is condemned to death, ANY exculpatory evidence should be immediately available to a neutral magistrate who could overturn the ruling or give the accused a new trial. I have simply heard too many stories of people facing death because they didn’t file some paperwork in time that had a DNA test that exonerated them.

    This is obviously unacceptable, but why are you leftists against the death penalty even if someone is guilty?

  28. hybridoma2001 May 3rd, 2008 11:04 pm

    Kem Patrick, as far as I am concerned, there’s no need to add to what you posted and opined, only that I agree.

  29. MA_Matriarch May 4th, 2008 12:29 am

    As far as I am personally concerned Texas should be seperated from the rest of the United States.

  30. MA_Matriarch May 4th, 2008 12:35 am

    I got as far as Huntsville, TEX and I couldn’t read any further. I have experienced enough with the way folks operate with the ongoing FDLS scandal. That in itself is enough for me in a lifetime.

  31. WJM May 4th, 2008 1:02 am

    Progress: You don’t get it at all. It’s not the rules of evidence that need to be relaxed, it’s the death penalty system that needs to be eliminated. Killing someone for killing someone else is not a sensible, moral, or even realistic approach to it. It doesn’t make you better, more moral or smarter than the very people you claim to want to “protect” us from. And it’s been shown that the death penalty is not applied equally, and is a very racist approach to things. Minorities are far and away more likely to be given a death sentence. And with the finality of the situation, it’s not acceptable to be killing even ONE innocent person.

    Your question about “what would you think if it was your family member that was killed” is just an emotional attempt to get people to stop using their higher thought processes. If we want to be a better country than other places, then we have to ACT like a better country. And appealing to people’s lower instincts isn’t going to make us that. Neither is calling people names like you are so superior to them because they don’t agree with you. And for the record, being a liberal is NOT a bad thing. All forward movement of any kind happens because of liberals. Conservatives do their best to stop that, so I suggest to you that it is your “conservativism” that is far more of a problem than anyone’s “liberal” thoughts. Regardless of what Rush tells you, if you want a better country and society, you won’t get there by conservatism.

  32. KEM PATRICK May 4th, 2008 1:03 am

    It’s not Texas MA. It’s those who are elected and of course our “Supreme” Court. The same type of Americans who live in Texas live everywhere. Many very good, some good, some not so good.

    Yes ~Hybridoma~ Thank you.___ One executed innocent is one too many and that should be the only reason necessary to stop all executions. Although there are arguments with other fair reasons.

  33. keithbarber May 4th, 2008 1:05 am

    In teaching a class on grade nine Law as a unit in Social Studies it was pointed out to me that Jesus was a wrongly accused and convicted/executed person by the government of his day.

    poor, unrepresented, another non-european executed in a miscarriage of justice. Even if these people have committed the crime killing them does not deter, does not undo what has already happened, and what side of our nature do we feed by killing, are we not only becoming murderers also by killing?

    Most of the planet views texas executions as a backwards ill-conceived non solution symptomatic of devolved governance.

    when education is compromised then so are the available solutions.

  34. Progress May 4th, 2008 1:50 am

    WJM- What do you mean by “better”? I’m not trying to be “better” then anyone by supporting the death penalty (for guilty people), I’m trying to enforce real justice.

    Again, the biggest problem seems to me to be the executing of innocent people. That almost makes me not support the death penalty, since in this country we continually screw things up. However, in theory I support guilty people getting what punishment they deserve, and there are many who deserve the death penalty.

    I don’t care what other “western countries” are doing. As far as I’m concerned, most of our european cousins seem to be falling all over themselves to flush their heritage down the toilet. I don’t want to be more like them.

  35. KEM PATRICK May 4th, 2008 2:35 am

    ~PROGRESS~ Would it disturb you that an innocent person may be executed and you still supported the death penalty? Is there a percentage that you would find acceptable, say 3%,__ 2,%,__ or just a very few?

    You asked, “what if someone murdered one of your family, what would you do?” __ I personally would want to kill them myself. But I would be lowerning myself to their level if I did, even if I felt very good about the ‘vengence’ was MINE. Of course we really do not know how we’d feel in the following years unless we did it.

    I ask you ~Progress~. What if someone in your family was convicted, put on death row and they swore they were innocent. __ What would you do?

    BTW, What’s the word “leftist” mean to you?

  36. skippyagogo41 May 4th, 2008 3:19 am

    Progress
    Why do you want to kill people to tell people that killing people is wrong?

    The way I see it is that executing them is too freakin merciful. They’re gone, you might think you know what happens after death, but you don’t know; no one does who hasn’t died, and they’re not talking to us anymore. When you count the court costs involved in putting someone to death legally it works out to more money than to keep them in jail for 60 years. It costs less money to keep them in jail than it does to kill them. The death penalty has never been a deterrant, in the days when pickpockets were publically executed guess what, pickpocketers were pinching purses from the people watching the hanging. Those who commit that sort of crime don’t think they’ll ever be caught. Your president, gw bush, has publically said that he ordered torture. That action has resulted in people dying under torture. That is a crime. Bush has no doubt that he won’t be held accountable for his actions. Why do you think that a common murderer would believe that they’d be accountable when bush doesn’t.

  37. hybridoma2001 May 4th, 2008 4:15 am

    After reading the past string of posts, I am reminded of the murder of a member of the Quaker community in Pennsylvania not so long ago.

    The compassion and forgiveness that communtiy showed toward the murderer was a lesson for all of us.

    I am continually clinging-on to these small groups of people who truly “walk the talk” in the hopes that it will reach a large enough scale so as to bring the USA back to its original foundations.

  38. good luck May 4th, 2008 6:37 am

    Why the shock people, America is a country that exports murder and protects and supports murderers around the globe.
    It also shows how bad off the US is when it is cheaper to kill these people off than keep them locked up with free healthcare food at about 70 to 100,000$ each per year. The country is broke and that is the bottom line.

  39. OldBadgertoo May 4th, 2008 7:03 am

    Yes, America acting in character and discrediting christianity and western civilisation as it does so.

  40. Poet May 4th, 2008 8:08 am

    Kem and Skippyagogo–good responses to Progress.

    Hybridome–

    Actually it was an Amish community and what they did while still mourning the death of their preteenaged girls was go to the funeral of the murderer (he killed himself after killing the girls) to stand in solidarity with his grieving relatives and then asked the murderer’s family if there was any other help they could give them. Now that was the Golden rule in action.

  41. Chuck Cliff May 4th, 2008 8:32 am

    In 1855, my great grand uncle, Watson, was on a journey to Utah.

    On the way, a trail hand killed the wagon master in broad daylight, in front of his wife.

    The bozo took off on foot with a rifle and said he would kill the first man who tried to stop him.

    A dozen from the wagon train went after him and surrounded him with raised rifles. The fellow was brought back to the camp, a judge and jury were appointed. The trial was held and he was hung around midnight of the same day.

    It was a full moon and he was buried by the side of the road, at his request, next to the man he had murdered.

    Often, when I tell this story, people are aghast. But what could they do? It was weeks to the next army post.

    My point is that only a well functioning, stable and secure society can have the luxury of not having captital punishment. In essence it is a measure of the strength of a social group.

    Jeeze, look at Turkey, hardly a shangrila of human rights — they have capital punishment but haven’t used it for a generation. It’s not the death peanalty as such, it’s the frequency and arbitrariness of its execution.

  42. MA_Matriarch May 4th, 2008 8:51 am

    Kem, it is not like me to say what I did about any state but for the last month I have blogged in a Texas newspaper and I have read way too much about the Texas justice system ann about the way people think there. I have no doubt there are good people that live in Texas but I honestly believe the scale is tipped with the lowest form of human beings. Their mentality is kill first ask questions later. They have the highest rate of jailed innocent of crimes. Speaking of the WH, look at where their “God” president resides.

    This goes all the way to Geronimo….

  43. wilmoor May 4th, 2008 8:55 am

    Nietzsche - “I haven’t heard George say lately that history will vindicate his policies.”

    That’s because he knows it’s a done deal.

  44. MA_Matriarch May 4th, 2008 9:02 am

    From what I have gathered the Constitution is nothing other than a burden for those people. They get what they want when they want how they want.

  45. middlec May 4th, 2008 10:18 am

    I can’t help thinking about the prophet Daniel who spoke of a future king who worshipped a god of fortresses.

    Let’s see…over 2 million in U.S. prisons, Guantanamo Bay, and secret detention centers all over Europe.

    Hmmm.

  46. hybridoma2001 May 4th, 2008 10:59 am

    Thanks for the correction, Poet. I had a feeling that it wasn’t the Quakers but the Amish didn’t come to mind at the time. Thanks again.

  47. Little Brother May 4th, 2008 11:10 am

    With all due respect, Chuck Cliff– Perhaps the Talon Law had its day, but that day is gone. Now the problem is the death penalty as such.

    ☮ ☮ ☮ ☮ ☮ ☮

  48. WJM May 4th, 2008 11:18 am

    Progress: Once again, you didn’t read what I said. First off, I never said “western” countries, I said industrialized. That means those that aren’t specifically third world, and at least try to offer some better life for their citizens.

    Secondly, you say that you are only interested in “justice”. How many innocent people have to die for YOUR sense of justice? If innocent people have to die for it, then it is NOT justice.

    And now I get it, you are a fearful person who doesn’t care for growth at all. You would prefer things if we were still in the age of riding around on horses or walking. You don’t like the fact that no matter how you try to keep it from being so, life is all about change. Sorry that you can’t handle the basic precept of life among humans. But that doesn’t give anyone justice, nor does it make you anything to brag about.

    What do I mean by better? I mean that we have some actual reason to call ourselves the moral leaders in the world. We used to be that, but thanks to people with your attitude, we are now lower than the rest of the industrialized world (note the word INDUSTRIALIZED, not western).We are in the league of those like the Sudan, Iran, China, and the United Arab Emerites, all of whom execute people. And as they say, you are known by the company you keep.

    Killing someone takes them out of your mind, but it doesn’t punish them. It just kills them. If you think about it, keeping someone alive and in prison is a far worse punishment than killing them. It gives them a lifetime to think about why they are there, and it makes them fight every day for their very survival. I can’t imagine a worse thing for anyone than that.

    We have become a scared, foolish country, and that disgusts me. If you think, like all right wingers seem to, that substance means nothing when it comes to your bragging rights, then you miss the point entirely. Unless you ARE “better” than other people, your boasts are empty, hollow bragging that has no reason for existence. In fact, it just makes you seem as useless as the wind it takes to do such bragging. And I can tell you aren’t interested in being a better person or a better country, you just want your own bloodlust satisfied. Too bad that innocent people have to die to accomplish that. And that should offend your sense of justice, except that you apparently don’t have a very developed one.

  49. greatbear215 May 4th, 2008 11:58 am

    For republicansm the sanctity of human life begins at conception but it ends at birth.

  50. ACC May 4th, 2008 12:24 pm

    The notion that the U.S. has ever been a beacon of human rights is pure propaganda. The death penalty is just the tip of a huge and very ugly iceberg. Anyone who thinks we have ever had the right to think well of ourselves over and against other countries such as China or Russia or Belarus or anyone else hasn’t read any history. Take a look at our actions in Central and South America, if you want to turn your stomach. Or the Philippines. Or Hawaii, or Diego Garcia, or Cambodia, or Viet Nam, or the Middle East going back sixty years. The death penalty is a true reflection of who we are as a society. We are killers. Not every American feels this way, just as not every American supports or supported the ugly things we have done around the world. But as a whole the country elects people who are killers, and the majority of people have no problems with the things that have been done in their names. The Bush administration is just the latest and most egregious bunch of killers, and to the credit of most Americans they are too much for most of us to stomach any longer. But look how low we had to sink before we finally woke up to the fact that we are as bad or worse than all those countries we’ve been pointing the finger at all these years. Even now, with Bush admitting he approves of torture, we still issue our Human Rights Report each year and point the finger at countries such as China for their “human rights abuses.”

    Hypocrisy goes hand in hand with evil.

    That being said, I do understand the desire for the death penalty. It takes all my strength to overcome my gut level desire to kill someone who has done something really sick, like rape and kill a child. I’m no Christian and “turning the other cheek” holds no power over me. Nor am I a Quaker, and I cannot aspire to their fine and noble sense of morality; I can only admire it from afar. But my mind tells me it is wrong, even as my gut tells me it is right. Fortunately, my mind wins the day over my instincts. But it isn’t an easy victory.

  51. KEM PATRICK May 4th, 2008 12:56 pm

    Very well said ~ACC~ And it is true that the truth hurts.

  52. bottle May 4th, 2008 2:17 pm

    The justices of the Supreme Court, collectively, seemed debased creatures– the Orcs in Tolkien’s “Lord of the Rings.”

  53. lastdregs May 4th, 2008 2:46 pm

    progress, the answer to your question is that it is called hypocrisy and murder. “I’m trying to enforce real justice”…the crime of murder will be punished by murder? how about rape being a just punishment for rape? starts to not make sense. neither do your assertions.

  54. chameleon2 May 4th, 2008 3:20 pm

    personally i am against the death penalty. all the appeals are too expensive. life without parole is a much better punishment (see interview with Jack Harry Smith).

    That being said, can someone provide list of innocent people that were executed in the US within the last 50 years?

  55. Tsunami May 4th, 2008 4:49 pm

    I remember when gambling was illegal, eg, bookmaking. But now governments sponsor gambling across the country, ie, lottery.

    Murder is murder by any label one puts on it. When cops shoot an unarmed person to death, it’s labeled self defense. When one shoots a cop to death, it’s labeled, murder. Murder by states is labeled, execution. The USA is still in a barbaric stage in time. Whether it is stoning to death, using a guillotine, hanging, or euthanasia, it’s still murder.

    Saddam Hussein was tried in a kangaroo court and hanged (beheaded) for allegedly killing 182 people of whom tried to murder him. Meanwhile, the US President has murdered, or caused the death of well over a million peoples and displaced approximately 5 million who fled Iraq, or, who are refuges within Iraq. He is still roaming free. Remember, not one of those people had done anything to anyone in the USA.

    The US military numbers available as of 5/2/08: 4,065 death and 93,625 wounded. (McLaughlin Group PBS).

    The word is that the US military doesn’t count the wounded that are treated and returned to battle.

  56. BioSphereMind May 4th, 2008 5:54 pm

    There are some offenses that are so severe, that the perpetrator should know upfront, once committed, they forefit their lives as a result. No appeals, no deals, no life imprisonment with out parole. Just light out, forever!
    Once the criminal is convicted, they have 6 months at most before the executioner comes calling.
    I am sick an tired of having our tax dollars supporting prison after prison, keeping murderers, rapist, armed robbers, drug dealers, and other heavy duty criminals alive forever. GET RID OF THESE MALCONTENTS.
    Since they cannot fit into, and get along with common society without resorting to brutality and death, they have no place here amongst us. Vicious and rabid animals are always put down, why not humans? Some criminals are beyond saving. Get rid of them.
    And paaleeze, spare me the Christian and Liberal defenses of kumbaiya, love, peace and light, and evening candle holding protests for everyone. I am sick and tired of you idiots as well.
    Serious and vicious crimes are going to climb steadily as the world become more stressed, and there is less and less food, oil, water, and habitable zones. Less money to, as jobs and industry dry up as a result of oil depletion.
    It is going to get very ugly soon, and I say, excecute the berserkers, and bring back old fashioned western justice at the end of a rope. People are getting fed up with the bullcrap from criminals and defense lawyers.
    We do not need more and more prisons to hold our growing numbers that are the worst of the bunch. How many more prisons? One hundred? a Thousand more? How about 50,000 more? When is enough really enough, and we say, that’s it! How much more of our tax dollars do we have to keep spending to keep these creeps alive?
    Where is the cut off point, when we ALL say, you commit the crime, you die scumbag!

    My feels are, we have already past that point! Warm up the chairs, Restock on the cyanide tablets, order more lethal injection cocktails,stock up on 1″ pre streched and waxed rope, restock on 30.06 bullets and hoods. Check out time is here!

    We have much more pressing issues that need our tax money, and you sucker, ain’t it!

    OH! and one last thing; I am not in favor of our military using felons from prisons to fill the ranks of the military. The chumps that make up the House of Representives are so timid, and scared of voter revenge, that they dare not even speak the “D” word, ever. What a crock of crap! If you want to enjoy a free America, and all it is supposed to mean to every one, then as a citizen, it your duty to defend it. If you refuse to do so when called,( DRAFTED ) you are stripped of your citizenship. It is that simple. Many nations in Europe have manadatory military service, so should we! ( 2 years min. )

    What we don’t need, is a bunch of lowlife thugs defending our nation. Our military is having nothing but problems with these type of idiots in the service. DUH!

    I put in 16 years of USA Military time. Honorably discharged as well. The NambyPamby young adults here today, make me sick to my stomach. Most of them do not deserve what they have. They take everything granted, and whine when they can’t have it all, now! Kick their asses into reality! Draft them!

  57. Darius q Paquette May 4th, 2008 6:16 pm

    And the so called people in charge believe in god, hows that work,I can kill you with out being held accountable, and god still loves me. But when you kill you must die,and they have to ask god to have mercey on your soul, whats the differnce, dead is dead. the government uses gods name to kill.(keep being sheep)

  58. KEM PATRICK May 4th, 2008 8:13 pm

    ~BIOSPHERE-MIND~. I see it don’t bother you at all if when we okay the laws to execute the guilty, we also execute those who are NOT guilty. Another innocent man who was on a death row, was released with sincere apologies just today. “Oh, dear me, we messed up again, so sorry, you have a swell day.”

    “Dang it, another scum-bag set loose.” Would that by any chance be your tough talk and thoughtless response ~Biospheremind~? ___ Just askin, __ out of couriosity.

  59. KEM PATRICK May 4th, 2008 8:40 pm

    Hi~CHAMELEON~ I think it would be very difficult to have a list of innocent people who were executed in even the last two years. Once they are dead few if any ever bother to check and see if they were innocent. It would not really make a lot of differance and most were probably poor people and who would have paid for any serious investigations?

    We do know well over a hundred who were on death rows and were not executed, were found beyond ANY doubt whatsoever, that they were innocent. As the article stated 35 were freed in Texas alone. By the mathamatical statistics, odds and probabilities, there are hundreds of innocent HUMANS who WILL be “humainly” executed and one is one too many. The only way to prevent that is to stop ALL executions, even when they MAY seem to be most appropriate.

    You know, if we are going to kill people to get even, let’s do it up right and make a real mess out of it and make a profit. First the rack, then disembowl them and while they are holding their guts in their hands, burn em alive, or set maddened pit bulls on them. ___ Charge admission or put it on Pay For View. ___”The Friday Night Executions”. ___ After all, this is America isn’t it?

  60. skippyagogo41 May 4th, 2008 9:10 pm

    BioSphereMind’
    Somehow I think your opinion would change if you, or a child/relative, was convicted and sentenced to death. Especially if you knew, but could not prove your innocence.
    Not all who served in the military think as you do, I served and don’t agree with you at all.

  61. DiabloRojo May 5th, 2008 2:30 am

    Big deal! So now the Death Penalty is back on the front burners…hurrah (not!)

    How is this going to solve the underlying reasons for this abominal situation?

    The noted comedian, author, actor and producer, Bill Cosby, had noted the only things being built in the US anymore were Prisons and Sports Arenas.

    Why isn’t the same amount of ardor and energy that’s gone/goes into building Arenas and Stadiums be channeled into our future, i.e., organic foods, real education, better health and welfare and housing, cleaner environment and nonpolluting transportation, a REAL DEMOCRACY in situ?

    People who strongly push for such a draconian measure as putting the accused to death are two faced!
    How can those death penalty supporters justify condemning one person to death while cheering on a mentally deranged Bush jr. who blithely gives orders to kill umpteen millions of people in other lands? Shouldn’t he and his cabal pay the same price for their murderous crimes? Is it not the same whether 1, 5, a dozen or millions more were murdered?

  62. DiabloRojo May 5th, 2008 2:53 am

    BioSphereMind:

    My feeling is that your tough rhetoric is a load of drivel! I have a feeling that, although you might’ve put in 16 years, you never saw combat. It’s always like that with military personnel of your caliber who never got close to the action. I met a lot of your ilk when I was in the military-big talkers all.

    They were so gung-ho on the idea of killing anyone accused of a crime; it never occurred to them that the accused may not have been guilty of any crime; the thing for them was the satisfaction of the “guilty” must pay fer their ungawdly ways!

  63. Hollow point May 5th, 2008 7:53 am

    Biosphere mind maybe open a window of your biosphere and let in some 02
    The way the Bush regine is run if they were given that much power that no chance if arrested then what is stopping them from sending innocent people away to where ever?

    SORRY BUSH DOES THAT NOW, and look at the world outrage. The true crime in america is people being sent up for 10 years for simple personal possession. Plus the level of racism in a state that is stuck in the 50’s

  64. JohnR May 5th, 2008 11:22 am

    The death penalty is antithetical to civilization. A state that kills a selected group of its lawbreakers is destined to become a failed state. Let me offer a description of such a place: “It is going to get very ugly soon, and I say, execute the berserkers, and bring back Western justice at the end of a rope….Serious and vicious crimes are going to climb steadily as the world becomes more stressed…” But, of course, the guys in the white hats own property and are justified in executing the have-nots.

  65. elmysterio May 5th, 2008 3:58 pm

    BioSphereMind: Hey, didn’t I see you running down the street a block away from where that lady was murdered? Yeah, that was you. You must have killed her… yeah, I SAW you kill her… In fact, I’m positive that it was you…

    It’s THAT easy to convict an innocent man…

  66. KEM PATRICK May 5th, 2008 8:24 pm

    Get a rope!! We’re gonna string up ~Biospheremind~, the murderin swine. ~Elmy~ saw him do it.

Join the discussion:

You must be logged in to post a comment. If you haven't registered yet, click here to register. (It's quick, easy and free. And we won't give your email address to anyone.)

 
   FAIR USE NOTICE  
  This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
 
 
 
Common Dreams NewsCenter
A non-profit news service providing breaking news & views for the progressive community.
Home | Newswire | Contacting Us | About Us | Donate | Sign-Up | Archives

© Copyrighted 1997-2008
www.commondreams.org