Contrary to His Claims, Senator John McCain Is Not a Goldwater Conservative
Arizona Senator John McCain recently completed a "biographical" tour of the country in an effort to keep his name in the media as the presumptive GOP presidential nominee, given the fact that Senators Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama are currently consuming much of the newsroom oxygen. McCain ended that tour in Prescott, Arizona.
A Prescott newspaper noted the symbolism of McCain's final speech at the historic Yavapai County Courthouse. This was the location where McCain's Republican predecessor, Barry Goldwater, started all his bids for office. McCain likes to refer to himself as a Goldwater Republican. Accordingly, the McCain campaign welcomes and invites editorials like that of the St. Louis Post Dispatch, which found him to be "in the mold of Barry Goldwater, a principled conservative, not a kleptocratic opportunist."
In truth, however, "kleptocratic opportunist" is a pretty good description of John McCain, and certainly more accurate than one describing him as fitting into the Goldwater mold. I say this because I knew Senator Goldwater virtually from the time of his arrival in the Senate until his death, and I have just completed a book with his son (and my longtime friend), Barry Jr., which is based on a previously-unpublished private journal kept by Senator Goldwater. We call the book Pure Goldwater.
The Nature of Goldwater's Principled Conservatism
After discovering Senator Goldwater's journal, we decided to assemble it for publication in 2008 because this historic and iconic figure -- while not perfect -- is a wonderful example of a public servant. As Lee Edwards, a Goldwater biographer now at the Heritage Foundation, said at an event for the book, the material is important not only because it fills in gaps about the Senator, but also because it fills in information about our political history.
Our book is a collection of Senator Goldwater's thoughts, more a scrapbook than an autobiography, yet it presents a clear picture of his conservatism in development and in action. Goldwater, simply stated, drew on the wisdom of the past and applied it to the present in a fashion that protects individual freedom and liberty. Most importantly, the fundamental principle underlying his conservatism was his unyielding belief that it is the duty of public officials to be honest and truthful.
As history shows, Goldwater did not merely talk the talk, he walked the walk. There are few politicians -- and Goldwater was proud to use that term to describe his public service -- who left the playing field with the well-deserved reputation for widely-acknowledged integrity of Barry Goldwater.
By calling himself a Goldwater Republican or Goldwater conservative, John McCain invites the comparison, but that is an error on McCain's part, for closer examination shows that he is not in the mold of Goldwater, notwithstanding his claims (or wishes) to the contrary.
John McCain Vis-à-vis Barry Goldwater
While out promoting the Goldwater book, I read Matt Welch's McCain: The Myth of a Maverick. (Only after I completed this nicely-done analysis did I realize it had been published by Palgrave Macmillan, which also published Pure Goldwater.) In reading Welch's work, I was impressed by the striking differences between these two men, as was Welch. In the following discussion, I have combined my personal knowledge regarding Goldwater with what I have learned from Welch's books to offer an overall assessment.
To begin, Welch reports that McCain seeks to use the federal government to generate greater patriotism and expand the nation's greatness, while Goldwater -- knowing the folly of empire and excessively large government -- sought to maximize individual liberty and local autonomy.
Welch notes, too, that McCain has no problem whatsoever being a nasty if not a devious s.o.b. when he sees doing so as necessary to serve or accomplish a greater cause. Goldwater, on the other hand, rejected all incivility and dishonesty in public service, and refused to take the low road; for him, the ends never justified any means. McCain, we learn from Welch's book, has wanted to be president since returning from Vietnam, while Goldwater was drafted to be the GOP standard-bearer. Stated a bit differently, McCain's oversized ego provides him strength, while Goldwater curtained his natural strengths by always acting with great humility.
No wonder, then, that when McCain sought to suck up to Goldwater, Goldwater declined to embrace this very different politician. Welch points out that "McCain has spent much ... time puzzling over Goldwater's lack of embrace." Indeed, McCain stated in his memoir Worth the Fighting For when discussing Goldwater, "I admired him to the point of reverence, and I wanted him to like me.... He was usually cordial, just never as affectionate as I would have liked."
This is no surprise to anyone who knew Goldwater. Welch sums it up accurately: "[T]he biggest differences between McCain and Goldwater were so obvious, [and] so destined to keep the two men out of each other's arms, that McCain's inability to identify them borders on self-denial and political tone-deafness." The gulf is wide, and the difference fundamental: Goldwater loved America and its people; McCain loves power, and what it can do for McCain.
Goldwater, While Initially a Supporter, Soon Soured On McCain
Although Goldwater initially supported McCain's run for the Senate, Goldwater knew an opportunist when he saw one, and did not like any of them. We chose not to dwell on the McCain/Goldwater relationship in Pure Goldwater, but we did report how, after assisting McCain win his Senate seat, Goldwater was forced to pull McCain up short for using his good name for fundraising, when McCain had tarnished his own name because of his involvement with the Keating Five. We also included correspondence to shows that McCain is not very good at keeping his word.
To know Goldwater -- as we believe those who read his unpublished private journal will -- is to understand how different these men are, and to see that McCain is cut from very different cloth than Goldwater. Goldwater considered public service a high calling, not an ego trip or power play. McCain was fortunate that Goldwater never publicly exposed him, but Goldwater was too good a Republican to do that and he thought too highly of McCain's father to sink his successor in the Senate.
Had Goldwater publicized what I believe to be his true feelings about John McCain, I doubt McCain would be the presumptive nominee of the GOP in 2008. Goldwater's political perceptions of others have proven extraordinarily prescient, so his reaction toward McCain is telling.
In assembling Pure Goldwater we deliberately looked at Goldwater's fascinating life in its broadest context, providing countless historical details that might otherwise have been lost (like Gerald Ford's offering Goldwater the vice presidency, but Goldwater's turning it down because he felt he could be more effective in the Senate.) But within this broader context, the book makes quite clear that John McCain and Barry Goldwater are as different as night (McCain) and day (Goldwater).
John W. Dean, a FindLaw columnist, is a former counsel to the president.
© 2008 FindLaw.com
Twitter
StumbleUpon
Facebook
Delicious
Digg
Newsvine
Google
Yahoo
Technorati
10 Comments so far
Show Allelmysterio wrote:
I HATE the term CONSERVATIVE as it applies to the 'right' spectrum of politics… what exactly are these people conserving?
The language has changed... words have new and completely unrelated if not opposite meanings.... The word "conservative" is one of the most offensive of these. "Conservative" in today's usage means nothing at all similar to what it did in my father's day. I grew up with conservatism...... and it was something I respected and admired though as a young man often disagreed with. The word has been usurped and now bears a meaning in common usage, very similar to Fascist. It appears to be linked to the politics of greed, and imperialism, of materialism and militarism..... judgmentalism, and intolerance, and of mindless adherence to a corrupt ideology, and mindless acceptance of a corrupt religious perversion of Christianity as defined by twisted demigogs.
At this point in time I would be as ashamed and / or outraged to be described as "conservative" in todays lingua as to be called "Gay" (another word which has similarly been usurped. The truth is that the language is beyond our control....... Webster's dictionary does not define the language....... common usage does!
Howard
At the end of his Friday town hall meeting in Denver, Colorado, Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., seemed to imply that an energy policy less dependent on Middle Eastern oil might have prevented fighting in the region.
"My friends, I will have an energy policy that we will be talking about, which will eliminate our dependence on oil from the Middle East," McCain told a crowd of 300 at a Jewish Community Center in Denver.
"That will prevent us from having ever to send our young men and women into conflict again in the Middle East."
I thought you'd like to check out the political allegory of mine that I just found a literary agent for. It's a story set in the context of a teacher discussing with his class all of the evidence that the Bush administration is as corrupt as it is incompetent...and how to rectify the Constitutional crisis we face. It's couched in a discussion about the urgent need to stop abusing Mother Nature. I wrote in 3 dozen celebrities to play the students, so it's very funny despite how infuriating it is. You can read it at www.stoplittering.com/theswitch.htm and, yes, StopLittering.com is my site.
elmysterio - they are conserving their privilege.
goldwater was a thoroughgoing racist and militarist. his "principles" have given us this government of money and wars. my sense is that goldwater's hatred for opportunists and scoundrels was based simply on not wanting any competition at the table. legacy indeed.
Although Dean in this essay does not list Goldwater's faults or flaws (and why should he?), I don't believe that either the essay or the book qualify as panegyric. In fact, I suspect JohnR of finding a big word and fondling it in print. More to the point, I am a lifelong, yellow-dog Democrat, raised in Arizona during Goldwater's last decade in office, when I was force-fed the Goldwater line by my mother, who went to college with and all but worshiped him; consequently came to despise him and all his kind; then gradually learned over the years that Goldwater, though benighted in his politics ;=) , truly was a terrific fellow and did not deserve my scorn. I too, along with wcdevins, wish that Goldwater had been a bit less party-loyal, a bit more outspoken, toward the weasels and kleptocrats who stole the Republican Party for their own enrichment.
I HATE the term CONSERVATIVE as it applies to the 'right' spectrum of politics... what exactly are these people conserving?
Dean says Goldwater was "too good a Republican" to tell us that McCain was unworthy. THE problem with party politics. This is NOT a virtue, people. Would that Goldwater would have been "too good an American" NOT to expose McCain.
This article is merely a panegyric and not very illuminating as biography. Too bad. I thought Dean's "Conservatives without Compassion" an insightful book. Maybe it's getting so hard to find any virtues in contemporary Republicans, Dean has to wax nostalgic about his hero.