Mothers Know the Cost of War
Once you've given birth, your whole perspective on war changes. Once you have laid your baby's head on your chest and breathed in his fresh-to-the-world sweetness, you learn what you love and what you hate. Mothers know the value of life, thus, we know the cost of war.
Once you've given birth, you become so grateful that your child is not the one having to hide under blankets in corners, flee from gunfire and witness the burials of family members as a matter of course. You see your child's face reflected back to you in the newsprint of the daily papers.
When your country is at war, you look at your child differently: You hold his hand more, you keep him closer to you, you whisper "I love you" more than once as you kiss him good night. When your government's immoral acts of aggression have resulted in the deaths of 1 million civilians, many of them children, you love your child with an overly possessive devotion and zeal. You look into his bright eyes when he's excited about going to Chuck E. Cheese and you thank God you are not in Baghdad, huddled somewhere together, your body thrown over his to save the life you brought into the world.
When you meet Gold Star mothers and fathers who have lost a child in this war, the pain you feel after listening to them is incapacitating, though it is only a fraction of theirs. Four thousand thirty-seven soldiers have been killed -- some of my husband's friends with whom he served in Taji, Iraq, and Bellingham's Jonathan Santos among them.
Humanity cannot withstand the exacting toll of our nation's tragic hubris. We need to leave Iraq.
While struggling to formulate an exit strategy, members of Congress are confused. They are bogged down in an intellectual maze believing the debate to be solely about length of time for combat operations, or number of troops to withdraw and when. There is no military solution and there will not be a political solution as long as the U.S. is involved. But there is a moral solution.
It is the moral solution that will hasten an end to the occupation of Iraq. It calls us to stop funding the war; withdraw our troops, contractors and end all military presence; flood the country with internationally led humanitarian relief and reconstruction paid for by the United States; admit our wrongdoing and allow the International Criminal Court to judge our leaders.
While blood flows, U.S. military officials go through epideictic justifications for continued bloodshed. They present color-coded charts to report on danger levels in certain areas where our presence inflames violence; they orate numbered strategies and repeated benchmarks for success and victory. Once you've given birth, however, you go beyond statistics into the hearts of people and you see clearly the measure of things. The moral solution calls us to apologize to the Iraqi people; it calls us to don mourning clothes and pray for the restoration of our own souls.
Until then, there will be no solution to the ravage and ruin we have caused, and the mothers will continue to grieve as their sweet babies die.
Marie Marchand is executive director of Whatcom Peace & Justice Center in Bellingham and mother of a 7-year-old boy.
©1996-2008 Seattle Post-Intelligencer
Twitter
StumbleUpon
Facebook
Delicious
Digg
Newsvine
Google
Yahoo
Technorati
7 Comments so far
Show AllIt indeed must heart breaking to have lost a loved one in this so called war and occupation. I'm sure there were many who joined the military out of some sense duty to their country. At this time however, a person would have to be out of their mind to participate. I'm glad the author expressed the compensation that the people of Iraq deserve.
Chicanery, I agree with you that presently especially, that far too many mothers care about their own children first, and then some only. Just why is it that the Iraq occupation is taking a second place to the economy currently? Mothers in the US are worried about feeding their children and the high prices of fuel. Meanwhile the mothers in Iraq have experienced so much worse and for so long.
Lovely sentiment, but I once knew a mother of two who thought the U.S. should drop a really big bomb on Bagdhad, even though, as I pointed out to her, that would kill a lot of women and children. I've also seen a mother on the television threatening to obliterate Iran. Another mother thought that 500,000 children dying in the Iraqi sanctions was "worth the price".
Mothers are indeed very protective of their children, but that doesn't always translate into worrying about someone else's children.
P.S.
Cindy's reply !!!!
cindysheehan April 28th, 2008 7:08 pm
Why haven't I mentioned it?
I have written a letter of solidarity to ILWU and I will be there to speak and march with my brothers and sisters.
Am I the CindyBabe you mention, Janelly?
Love
Cindy
Any CDers within range of San Francisco AND IN THIS CASE< SEATTLE, should try to show solidarity with these folks on May 1.
This is the event our fellow CDer peaceman has been talking about.
Think of it - a slap at Pelosi in her own back yard.
I wonder why CindyBabe has not mentioned it hmmmmm?
Clash ahead over longshore union war protest
George Raine, Chronicle Staff Writer
Saturday, April 26, 2008
Members of the International Longshore & Warehouse Union are proceeding with plans for a work stoppage at 29 West Coast ports on May 1 to protest the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, despite the fact that union leadership has withdrawn its request to waterfront employers that they accommodate closure of the ports.
Planning for the protest began in February when the Longshore Caucus, the highest decision-making body for the 25,000 members of the longshore division within the ILWU, overwhelmingly approved a resolution in support of a day of protest.
…… for remainder see:
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2008/04/26/BUC610C2HA.DTL&hw=longshore&sn=001&sc=1000
cutbankid said: If women had an equal hand at shaping foreign policy
There are a lot of women working in this administration and each and every one of them is as INSANE and warmongering as the men. Think of Madeline Albright. There's a Stone Cold Killer if I ever saw one.
Ms. Marchand gets to the heart of the issue, as only a mother can. If women had an equal hand at shaping foreign policy, I doubt there'd be a "need" for war. Men, who own and run the world, have an artificial need for war, a need born out of their crippled identity. They've never been "right" since they cast off their feminine side, a mistake that coincided with their casting aside women, demoting them to secondary (if lucky) status. I go into this argument in Women: DOWN through the ages, How Lies have shaped our Lives.
Do these American mothers really know the cost of war? The writer has spoken to Gold Star families - those honored for dying in a war against an innocent people. How many Iraqi mothers has she spoken to? The sons of these American mothers vounteered to fight a war of occupation in a foreign country. They killed civilian Iraqis, barged into their homes, rounded them up at gunpoint, pushed Iraqis around in their own land. What do you think Iraqi mothers know, then? Do they think of American soldiers as "sweet babies"? Or do they see them as what they are - occupiers in a foreign land who have made Iraqi lives hell? If Iraqi soldiers were brutalizing us, would we think of them as "sweet babies"? Would we agree with those who did? Would we not try everything to get them out of our country?
If you are so concerned about the cost of war, refuse to fight. Refuse to invade a sovereign nation that has done no harm to you and yours. Till then, do not prate about the cost to you while completely ignoring the cost to those who did not ask for the nightmare you have visited on them. You do not wish to pay the ultimate cost, right?
DO NOT GO TO IRAQ.