How to Be a Climate Hero
One afternoon last summer, I was on a commuter train when I heard someone yelling behind me. I didn't pay attention because I was breaking up a fight between my kids. But the third time the person yelled, I turned around.
It was a boy, about six years old. He was standing on his seat screaming, "My mom's having a seizure!" The only part of his mom I could see were her legs, sticking out into the aisle, convulsing. And arrayed around the train car were forty other people, mouths open. Not one of them doing a thing.
Humans tend to freeze like this-the Bystander Effect, it's called. It was first demonstrated in a famous psychology experiment by John Darley and Bibb Latané in which the subject was asked to fill out some forms. He or she assumed these forms were preparatory to the experiment, but the experiment had already begun. While the person circled multiple-choice answers, smoke began to sneak out of a vent in the room. Thick, gray smoke. The kind that says fire. The experimenter then timed how long it took for the subject to leave the room.
The only variable was whether there were other people in the room. These people pretended to be subjects also, but actually they were actors paid by the experimenter to stay there, heads down, pencils working, ignoring the smoke. If the subject was alone in the room, 75 percent of the time she or he would leave inside of a minute. But if there were others in the room working away on their forms, the subject would stay there with them -- 90 percent of the time. Stay there filling out forms until the smoke was too thick to see through. Until, if there had been a fire, it would have been licking at the walls.
In the decades since that first experiment, it's been repeated with many variations on the type of emergency: staged robberies, lost wallets, people in hallways crying for help, etc. Every time, if there was more than one person witnessing the event, all of them were almost certain to do nothing.
So the boy on the train was loudly identifying this as a true emergency, his mother physically demonstrating the urgency of the matter. Still everyone sat there, mouths open. Half of them had cell phones, but not one of them was dialing 9-1-1. Remember this fact: although we feel safer in a crowd, that's actually where humans are most incapacitated. The bigger the crowd, the stronger the effect.
Right now everyone understands that something truly horrible is happening to the planet's climate. The heat waves and forest fires, the floods and droughts. But there are 6 billion of us now-quite the Bystander Effect. So we stay in our seats filling out forms, trying to ignore the smoke swirling thicker around us. We bustle about our normal lives, assuming it can't be as bad as it seems because surely, then, everyone would be marching in the street about it.
On the train with the epileptic mother, I stepped forward, yelling out, "Someone call 9-1-1! Someone get the conductor!" I knew about the Bystander Effect, had studied it in school, and knowing about the effect, it turns out, inoculates you against it.
Before I moved, everyone's faces had been contorted with terror - as though they were the ones having the seizure, or as though this woman thrashing around like a dying fish might be about to start biting their ankles. But from the moment I stepped forward, telling them what to do, the fear in their faces melted away. Two other people stood up to help. Four others whipped out their cell phones to call 9-1-1. One person ran for the conductor. They just needed someone to break the group cohesion and start the action.
A few years ago, when my first child was born, I became paralyzed with fear about climate disruption. It was so clear that our children would be punished for what we adults were doing to the world. I got depressed. I got anxious. Then, from sheer desperation, I started writing letters to editors. I remember well the first one that got published. It was in the Boston Globe, and it supported building Cape Wind, the large wind farm proposed for Nantucket Sound. The head of Cape Wind called me up personally to thank me. The thrill I got. The sense of agency.
After that I was out of my seat. I believed there was a safe room I could try to get to if I moved super quick. Now I go to every demonstration. I write to every politician.
I insulate my house fanatically. I don't own a car. Every year I do a little more: composting kitchen waste, shopping at farmers' markets, recycling, buying only secondhand. Using carbon calculators, I've figured that I've lowered my family's emissions 50 percent in seven years. That's a big step. Because of my actions, my fear for my children's future is not incapacitating. I'm striding down the aisle trying to help. Not only have I improved my emotional state, I've broken group cohesion and started to pull others from their seats. I've gotten friends and relatives to insulate more and drive less, to admit the problem and start thinking about the solution.
Scientists tell us we have ten years, if that, to make significant changes. Every indication, from ice caps to defrosting tundra, seems to show this is the tipping point. This is our moment. Perhaps you never thought you'd get a chance to play hero. Here it is. The kid on the train is screaming out for help. The weather is convulsing. It doesn't matter if you aren't sure what to do. Make your best guess. Call 9-1-1. For god's sake, get the conductor.
--Audrey Schulman
© 2008 Orion Magazine
Twitter
StumbleUpon
Facebook
Delicious
Digg
Newsvine
Google
Yahoo
Technorati
83 Comments so far
Show AllPrepare for life without the grid, ocean commerce, air travel or readily available oil/gas. Set up solar and wind at the neighborhood level. Water gathering and filters, composting waste methods, communal resources and tools. And there probably will be no internet or cell phones for ordinary folks. Get a way to charge batteries by solar or wind. I think we have about three years until an undeniable environmental event occurs, after which everything changes. Call me Noah, call me snydly, call me whatever you want, but don't call me late for the survival party...
cheers.
Thomas More, do your own research. Go to any database of peer-reviewed science articles (for instance http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez) and type in climate change in the search window.
You'll get hundreds of articles and not one of them will deny the fact that the planet is warming overall because of humanity's emissions and that this is having massive climate and biological impacts.
Sure, the scientists will dispute exactly what those impacts are and how fast and in what areas, but none of them dispute the overall warming or the impacts themselves. To argue that these on-going disputes mean the planet isn't warming is specious. Making that argument is similar to --upon being given 5 different medical predictions about how quickly your heart attack will come if you keep on eating cheesecake every day-- saying there is no medical agreement and you can eat whatever you want.
Don't belIeve it, ~HAMSTER~ because he's totally wrong.
http://bp2.blogger.com/_otfwl2zc6Qc/SAF_gqCFAdI/AAAAAAAAENo/7GSoPsnqKI0/s1600-h/world.bmp
Thomas More:
I think you're a nice guy too, but you're not going to convince me by making stuff up that suits your arguments. (I also don't believe your stats on scientists who dispute global warming)
Gore would be hot sex huh ~Namaste~? __Nice warm beaver is is lots better than cold.
It is a sign of a grassroots, humble leader when an author, like this one, posts to this list. See at audreyschulman April 28th, 2008 12:10 pm
I loved the article. The "bystander effect" is very real. I've witnessed it. People are so relieved when someone breaks the frozen stupor of the group.
There is much we can do in at least two categories: legislation and personal action.
New Zealand passed legislation (in their new multi-party parliament which had been a US-type of two-party system in 1993). This legislation requires passive solar hot water heaters on newly constructed buildings. I forget if is residential, commercial or both. More of that would be great, along with making a law that home owner associations cannot ban clothes lines, like so many do. If we get a semi-progressive government in the US at some point we can get much Apollo Alliance-types of legislation for conservation and sustainability. There is much about sustainability at www.rmi.org.
Regarding personal conservation, I have learned much from the New Zealand friends I have. (And they many suggestions in the article and the comments so far.) New Zealanders tend to heat only the room they are in (the ones I know). At night the house is heated very little, but instead comforters and electric blankets keep them warm. I do that now. In winter I often wake up to a house that is about 45 degrees F. Then I warm the room I'm in with an oil-filled electric heater. No central heat. I don't use it. This practice is common not only in New Zealand but in much of Europe.
With washing and drying clothes, most of the energy in the US lifestyle for cleaning clothes is from drying wet clothes at about 8000 watts for an hour our more. Not necessary. I learned to hang my clothes outside or inside. Then I just tumble them in a dryer with no heat to fluff them up and make them comfortable. It works just fine, saves much money on energy, and saves wear-and-tear on clothes. In summer my hot water comes from my sophisticated, expensive passive solar heating system: bleach bottles painted black placed on the west side of the house.
My last water bill was for 690 gallons for a month. (That includes hosing out the mud in the garage from winter mud.) That is for one person and my cats in one whole small house. That is 33 gallons a day. The average American uses over 100 gallons a day, something those in Atlanta will be adjusting soon due to climate change in the Southeast USA. They key techniques: take very short showers with solar heated water; flush toilets rarely; and don't run water you aren't using. I wash dishes by hand. You get the idea . . .
By combining new legislation and changing personal habits we can greatly reduce consumption and emissions.
Bravo to such a great article. I love the way the Bystander Effect story frames the issue. Thanks Audrey. Fabulous!
Okay ~THOMAS MORE~, thanks for the good words. I'll shut up when the CD editor has me exorcized. You can put the rock down now, it soudns like you're a nice man and probably didn't need the test, but climate change and global warming indeed are two seperate issues.
BTW, there are thousands of scientists who have spent their entire adult lives studying the planet, the ecology, our enviroment, our oceans, who agree fully that the Arctic methane gas is a very serious issue and only a handful of credible scientists now disagree.
Most only argue how much longer we have before it "Burps". Some say 10 to 20 years, some say a 100 or more. All now agree, they are amazed at how fast the Arctic is thawing. It's not funny.
We have highly motivate people. Most people want to find and be part of the solution. It is the decision makers in power that are used by the oil companies to continue making them profits. Even the DOD and CIA can see the folly in that. But when you have a president that says go shopping after a large disaster like 9/11 and wants to drill in ANWR you do not have the leadership required. ANWR will make billions for oil companies but not one drop may make it to the U.S. Alaskan oil use to have to come to the U.S. but Gingrich and the Republicans put a stop to that in 1995.
Question: Why is it a human "right" to reproduce? I'm not necessarily suggesting it isn't a right, but I'm not saying it is, either. It is certainly an instinct, but many things that are instinctive are ethically wrong (e.g., a man forcing a woman to have sex with him because he finds her overwhelmingly attractive, or an adult stealing a child's bread because he/she is hungry and stronger than the child, or attacking someone physically because that person has made you angry).
On a planet as over-populated as ours, I believe the first order of the day is to stop over-reproducing. I think the Chinese have the right idea -- one couple, on child. My husband and I chose not to have any children at all, and it was a choice based on the fact that the planet does not need any more people than it already has.
A couple with one child can lavish its time and resources on it and raise one very high-quality human being. When I see a family with two working parents and half a dozen children (very common) I know those children are not getting much quality nurturing from their parents, besides which they are definitely contributing to the over-population of the planet.
If we had fewer people, we would need less energy, so maybe those coal-driven plants wouldn't be built. Fewer cars. Fewer houses built on filled-in wetlands. Fewer famines. Fewer depleted aquifers. Fewer crimes related to scarce resources.
Just for the record, I don't think reproduction is a right. I think it is a privilege, and one most people don't deserve.
Kem and to all -check the link,
Thanks for posting about the methane. I don't read MSNBC corporate news but found this one from following links that started from a BBC article. I'm surprised that MSNBC posted the following:
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/24277642/
-
By the way -- Wish CommonDreams allowed some way to exchange email addresses or a set of message boards we could join. I could say keep this message for next time. Then something like the next message will contain a clue to a domain name based on a previous post, but that's not a great way. How about CD makes one of those web-based bulletin boards? Provide access as a benefit for making a contribution to CD like PBS does at pledge time?
I'll chime in with The Prof, civil behavior, et al.
While all of the the suggestions posted here (avoid plastics, reducing energy consumption, etc) are good and need to be done, the best they will do is delay the coming onslaught slightly.
I also made the decision nearly 30 years ago to have a vasectomy. I didn't want to add to the problems that I could foresee coming.
Another big factor if you wish to reduce energy consumption that I haven't seen mentioned here -- you can reduce your carbon footprint by a factor of 16 simply by going vegetarian or vegan. It take 16 times the amount of energy to produce a similar amount of caloric content from meat as it does produce. And produce is better for you, to boot:
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/01/27/weekinreview/27bittman.html
But alas, no matter what you do, global warming induced chaos is here. Now. Has been for some time. We already have food riots occurring globally, and water is becoming an incredibly precious resource. World governments and "intelligence" agencies, all know this -- the fight has already begun for the control of resources. In fact it has been going on for many years now.
Even if we did reduce our carbon emissions and population growth to zero (which will never happen...in fact many governments are doing the opposite by encouraging encouraging humans to reproduce though tax incentives, etc.) it is already too late. Unfortunately there are too many misguided people in the world who'd run over their own mother with their Hummers in order to get to a station that offers gas for 2-cents a gallon cheaper than the one they normally use. In other words, a sizable portion of the populace doesn't give a shit. It's "us" vs. "them", a meme they are sold by the military/industrial complex and its propaganda machine, the mainstream media. Label your next door neighbor a "terrorist" and the groundwork has already been laid -- we can torture, kill, and steal all of his resources, in fact it's your patriotic duty to do so.
I'll be turning 50 this year. Perhaps I won't be around to witness the worst of the chaos yet to come, but for me it is already bad enough. I find it astonishing how selfish or in denial many seemingly intelligent people are, still producing offspring that face such a horrible future. When confronted, I often hear them say things like "well, maybe my child will be the one who comes up with the solution for global warming" or " will become president and achieve world peace." Yeah, and monkeys might start flying out of my ass tomorrow morning too. They just might.
No one will win this war. There is no "us" vs. "them" here on spaceship earth. There is only one of us, and by that I don't mean just human. I mean Nature, with a capital N. And Nature is disappearing at an alarming rate, while ignorant and propagandized humans will continue to fight to the bitter end over the spoils. We face a bitter chaotic end, with the best case being a scenario like TheProf describes.
KEM PATRICK April 28th, 2008 12:21 pm
I promise to shut up after this, but I noticed that earlier you had remarked that some might prefer it if you didn't harp on what you thought was the most important point in the world. I don't THINK I agree with you, but you keep right on harping and posting.
Thats how we learn from others, expand our knowledge. I know that I've changed my mind on some things because of points brought up by a person that held opposing beliefs on almost everything to me, more than once.
So, please keep on harping and posting.
audreyschulman April 28th, 2008 12:10 pm
Great article Ms. Schulman
Now I just have to figure out which Republican neighbors I'll eliminate to decrease my carbon-emissions and guilt from reproducing.
Don't forget the Democrats and Independents! We're all in this boat together.
The US is as I understand it not even at replenishment birth rates by Americans. I understood the problem to be most critical in Asia, Africa and South America?
Really neat that you posted a comment too. Thank you Audry.
This is the most important issue right now.
http://www.energybulletin.net/3647.html
That is the issue we should ALL be talking to our elected about, even our Republican neighbors. There is ony one way to correct it. ___ A world wide effort with all of humanity joining together to fight a war that won't kill, instead of one that does.
Gee guys, all I was trying to say was that for every one of the "scientist's" that are claiming proof that there is global warming, there are 3 that say its not.
By any scientific methods that I was taught, its still a theory. I didn't say it was wrong, just that its not proven by agreed science.
civil behavior April 27th, 2008 4:28 pm
"The change starts with Americans who at 4% of the worlds population and having selfishly consumed 25% of the worlds resources,"
You missed the part where we produce 67% of the world resources. Take away our food production and half the world starves. These are facts too.
We as a Nation have also work harder and longer than any other people on Earth. Doesn't mean we can't do better, but earning a larger share doesn't mean selfishness. (though many are)
An excellent idea on proper tire inflation, one that costs nothing, produces undoubted gains, and can be done today....and as someone else pointed out, if you don't know what it should be, it's on the door jamb.
In fact all your suggestions are great except
"Replace just 3 of the regular light bulbs in your home with Compact Fluorescent Light bulbs."
And only because the jury is still out on total energy savings. Yes they save more energy in use, but they take far more energy and resources to produce, a real problem with disposal and health dangers. Lets make sure this isn't another Biofuels debacle before we jump in.
The biggest problem with following yours and others good suggestions is discipline. We all don't have enough, I know I don't.
I also have a 2001 Tahoe which I did a cost analysis on for energy savings to find out how much we could save by getting another Toyota. You SUV haters are going to hate this, but I found out I could save far more by keeping it based on the amount of driving I do. Savings in material, gas and energy costs by not replacing my Tahoe with a Totota save the planet over 447 gallons of gasoline a year for 5 years. Cutting the emissions by even more. So next time you suggest getting rid of your SUV to save energy or look down (up) your nose at an SUV driver from your Prius, remember, it might be you that is using more energy and producing more emmisions. Actually if we could afford a Prius that WOULD be more energy effective. We won't buy another SUV though when its time to replace it 3.5 years from now. Toyota is it. T100 should be just about right.
Retire Green also makes a very, very good point and add Recycle1's attitude to it, you've got a good plan for living.
Great article Audrey.
Hi, I'm the author of the original article under discusssion (which by the way CommonDreams did not ask me about publishing, nor even tell me they were publishing. Sure, I want the article reprinted and I love CommonDreams, but hey, they could ask).
Love the comments on all this, the community of it. Makes all of us feel less alone.
Now I just have to figure out which Republican neighbors I'll eliminate to decrease my carbon-emissions and guilt from reproducing. Talk about Cap and Trade.
While I don't argue at all that reproducing is one of THE most carbon expensive actions you can make in your life, I keep praying that Americans parents will also wise up. I pray that motivated by love and worry for their children, they will create the biggest insurrection ever and change the status quo. One parent at a time, one household at a time, one state at a time. One Whitehouse at a time.
I have 2 kids (which I feel great guilt over), but I also use less than most families of two. And I'm working my way to conserving even more while living a healthier, happier, more meaningful and connected life. Without them, I don't know if I would be as motivated to do all that I do.
I can only hope that my children will lead the way further down this path that humans have to learn how to walk.
Honestly I don't know if we will win this battle, but I do know that at the end of my life I would hate to look back and realize I could have tried to do something but didn't.
What a nice thread, this sounds like Common Dreams of three months ago, with a swell group of wonderful people having a decent discussion about a very serious issue.
A lot of informative talk here about over-population, saving energy, gas mileage and such, but the real problem is global warming and most importantly the (methane gas.)
It may be too late, it may not be too late. We just don't know for sure. What we do know for certain is, if we don't begin to correct the mess we have created we're crazy, because it makes no sense to wait and attempt to correct it when we discover it actually is too late. This is an issue we all should put at the top of our priority list and attempt to discuss with our elected.
"Bacteria in petri dish with favorable substrate will reproduce until they fill the dish or exhaust the nutrients, and then their population will crash, perhaps to zero."
mwildfire,
Very good observation. In this regard, people are no different than bacteria...or any other species. When we have more food, our population increases - when we have less food, our population decreases. The fact that modern agriculture has fed more people is the main cause of population growth (modern medicine is another).
That being said, we clearly don't want to starve anyone, but we must be clear on the links between more food and more people. Many peoples on this earth are still subsistence farmers, and some are still hunter-gatherers. Clearly, our culture will not go back to those ways...unless we have to. However, that does not mean we can't do things other than how we're doing them now. For one thing, we can rebuild the local farm system and re-educate people to grow some of their own food. There are over 300 million people in the U.S. If just a quarter of us were to grow some of own food, that would take some pressure off the big ag system to produce more. I read somewhere that during WWII, 40 percent of fruits and vegetables that Americans ate were grown in victory gardens. Forty percent! This can be done, if we are willing to do it.
We could also help other nations to do the same, or just let their people do what they have done for hundreds of generations - grow their own and live within their own means. Of course, this would mean not interfering in their socio-political systems and making big ag back off from selling them the chemicals that have so decimated the topsoil around the world.
Big challenges, but it doesn't mean that we're absolutely doomed. I think things will get tough for most of us (the rich will feel it last) in the coming years. Those who decry that there is nothing left to do but curl up in a ball and wait for Armageddon have already died. Unfortunately, they still consume Earth's resources and many of them still reproduce.
CIVIL BEHAVIOR: I live in South Forida, too. When I visit my friends in the Florida Keys and see the preponderance of a great many trucks, mini vans and SUVS I think how well they have conspired with their own self-undoing, as they court the seas to rise all around them.
Oblivion, or is it a form of modern somnabulism? So many appear as hypnotized, but then fossil records dug up by our indomitable archaeologists show entire cities buried as the people went about their daily tasks. Shall that recur?
One of my favorite all-time films, "My Dinner with Andre" has Andre, an awakened soul dining with his Manhattan playwright pal. At one point during dinner "pal" mentions his electric blanket to which Andre responds, "How can you cut yourself off from something as powerful as the change of seasons?" About a week ago the temperature reached 38 at night, but I never bothered to turn on the heat. Maybe it was 50 or so in my place. My bill this month is $23. Unheard of... people are afraid to connect with nature. I am not advocating no heat if it's 32 degrees, but the way Americans seem addicted to AC and with the weight too many carry, sweat like hogs... it's time to connect with nature, turn down energy consumption and experience the GRACE that the gift of life allots. Waste, self-destruction, the right to harm passed off as freedom defines too much of America's lifestyles.
How on Earth can any person with an IQ of 65 deny the Arctic thawing, Greenland thawing, the Anarctic thawing, all of the world's mountain glaciers thawing, major rivers drying up, lakes drying up.
One of the largest lakes in Africa is now less than half it's normal size and depth for just one example. The thick ice on huge lakes in the Arctic have thawed and the water just flushed like a toilet. That all in just three years. ___ Deny it? ___ That's actually insane.
I think the no-brainer question was meant to be, which is the most important issue right NOW, and what would be the easiest to accomplish FIRST?
Getting ALL of humanity to reduce the number of children, taking into serious consideration religious beliefs of many different cults is just one obstical. The only obstical to having clean energy, is the electted and the powers who be who own the oil, the gas and the coal mines.
If every human on Earth died today, Global warming would still be a serious problmn for the rest of the life on Earth, as the PROF so well noted.
Sure are BBR, some of the denyers are right here.
Theprof and dgrey have the science of the situation down pat.
The conservationists are trying hard but the feedbacks may well be more than we can stop at this point. That's not to sy we all shouldn't try.
35 years ago we chose not to have children. I thought at the time it would be a water issue. I wasn't far off. At the time I didn't conceive of the possibility that it would be so much more including water.
A day or so ago a young 16 year old was killed by a hit and run driver on his dirt bike. Today in the paper the mother of TWELVE is asking for help in burying him because she doesn't have insurance or any money.
Someone tell me please, how are we going to solve any of the major issues we face today when we have the mentality that seems almost pernicious in nature before we implode upon ourselves?
I live in South Florida and I think I live in the apex of the worlds ills. That doesn't mean I don't save, conserve, got to rallies, protest, talk, work and overall try to keep an optomistic attitude but I've got to tell you, I think we're screwed. There are simply too many people (and many who could care less or know less) who are not doing what is necessary to keep a balance in this good earth.
BTW, wonderful posts all.
A beautifully written article. Thank you!
Which is more important--reducing the human population or the per capita consumption and emission levels? Well, that's a no-brainer--we must at once do both. Some seem to assume that this means killing people already here, but ideally it just means reducing births. Yes, this means interfering with people's right to reproduce at will--why should this be an unquestioned right? No matter how small your family's footprint, if you have four children instead of two (let's say), they will produce eight grandchildren instead of four, all of them needing certain goods and leaving an ecological footprint. Bacteria in petri dish with favorable substrate will reproduce until they fill the dish or exhaust the nutrients, and then their population will crash, perhaps to zero. Either humans are smarter than bacteria or we're not; soon we'll know.
I'm surprised no one has yet brought up, "Why should I tighten my belt when the Chinese are building a new coal-fired power plant every week, which will overwhelm whatever reductions we can achieve?" The answer is that the Chinese will continue to follow our lead; if we go beyond our obsession with consumption to develop a lighter lifestyle and innovative renewable energy technologies, they will likely follow. If we do nothing, if we continue with business as usual, they will use our example as an excuse to do likewise.
"Leadership
It is leadership by one person that can move many people into action."
It is by giving a good example, not by being led, too often like lambs to slaughter.
Speaking of heroes, I was over my parents' place tonight. Fox was promoting something about "American Heroes Fight Global Warming Hysteria" on Hannity tonight. Didn't have time to stay and watch, but clearly the deniers are alive and kicking.
When you tell people to consume less, that is going against our capitalist consumer society. It is based on growth and credit. If people only used what they needed and did not fill up their garages and storage units with junk from WalMart, where would they spend those tax rebate checks paid for by borrowing money from China?
I recall discussing global warming about 25 years ago with a colleague and remarking that those who were capable of effective action, namely politicians, had at most a 5 year outlook and concluded how stupid our species must be to allow this to occur. The science at that time was quite clear to scientists, even myself, for whom this is not my field.
Now I am of the outlook that we have already passed the tipping point for positive feedback. The event that led me to this conclusion was last year's disruption of the arctic sea ice. This in turn means a significant warming and melting of the northern Canadian, Alaskan and Siberian permafrost with the consequent release of methane. This positive feedback loop may well involve outgassing of oceanic methane clathrates.
The effects are more closely related to my field of study. I expect 50-70% extinction of species with an extreme culling of the human population, should our species survive. It is uncertain whether technology will survive. My most optimistic outlook is for a survival of technology, a recognition that energy usage must be coupled to solar output and that human populations, which are not checked by predation, need to be controlled by effective management policies.
I think some people burn too much energy, and some people have too many kids. And I mean, like, ten times too much or too many. If no-one did either, we wouldn't be where we are today. Oddly, in places where people tend to burn to much energy, people are not so likely to have too many kids. And vice-versa. It may or may not be too late to get by, even if everyone were about to start doing neither. And I don't get the impression they are.
In Europe, they have been paying way more for gas for ever. Their civilization has not collapsed, and they make much more sensible choices about what, where, and how to drive.
I agree Big Money. Last week I bought 28 gallons of gas and it was $96 bucks. We live 20 miles from the nearest town and on the way home where the two lane road's speed limit is 65 mph, I was doing 60 so that I wouldn't get shot at because the rush hour traffic had begun,
I usualy drive it at 50 to 55. At least 20 vehicles passed me and only two had more than one person in it. Most were Suvs or pickups. It doesn't seem to matter to hardly anyone that the price of gas is so high.
I was driving our 12 year old half ton Ford pickup, which holds 34 gallons in the two tanks and it still gets 19mpg since I put a camper shell cap on it 10 years ago. Before that we got 14mpg. I was amazed at the difference it made and as some have mentioned, tire presures are very important and often overlooked.
Have a good gage and check them at every fillup. If you fill in the evening if posible, you don't have as much loss from gas fumes escaping and always fill it slowly to reduce fumes from coming out the filler tube. And don't go to drive in theatres with a girl, ___ especially if she's beautiful and hot.
Thomas More,
I have a book suggestion for your summer reading list.
Under a Green Sky by Peter Ward.
You want proof? Or close enough to it to make your hair stand on end?
Read it and then come talk to me about scientific evidence.
Rocks don't lie. Fossils tell stories great and small. Our scientists can prove it.
Science is repeated observations, verified observations, and reproducible experiments. On global warming, the argument among honest scientists who deal in in the tools of science, hypothesis, test, verify, and reproduce tests to produce results, there is simply no debate left. Those who claim there is ignore the truth, and ignore the facts.
When scientists attempt to reproduce twentieth century trends in their climate models, they are only able to do so when including human-produced heat-trapping emissions in addition to natural causes.
It's sad to see man so unaware of how irrelevant his self-centered idea of his immediate comfort is.
KEM - "Over population is a very serious problem. So is burning coal, gas and oil. Which of the problems do you believe we should attack first?"
While I think we should start trying to deal with both, yesterday, I think one is much more easy and ethical to deal with than the other. There's oodles of waste to trim, and plenty of workable sources of energy that would be being exploited much more now had the oil/coal/gas companies not become so huge and rich and influential from their "crack" energy.
Messing with an individual's right to live, or reproduce, is a pretty dodgy prospect.
The scary thing is, I could see world governments messing with people's reproductive tendancies before taking any kind of meaningful stand in any migration away from fossil feuls.
I know I personally am a lot more inclined to find new ways for my family to consume less each year than I am to wish extinction upon them.
The vast majority of people are in no way inclined to do either. Maybe when oil is $500/barrel folks will pick one and care about it. Or maybe when there's no water, they'll pick the other.
Hi Recycle 1, better watch out for Thomas More. He might be holding an egg sized rock in one hand.
I wish it was a scam GEO522. Could you offer some explinations for us, instead of just saying it's a scam? __ Thank you, I'm willing to listen.
Hi ~BIG MONEY~. Over population is a very serious problem. So is burning coal, gas and oil. Which of the problems do you believe we should attack first?
China has been working on their over population problem for many years, they still have way over a billion population and it increases by leaps and bounds daily and the global warming problem continues. Should we steralize every person on the planet? That would help. Maybe just line up a few billion and shoot em, or give them poisoned lemonaide.
China is currently planning on another 1,000 coal fired power plants. We're building them here in the U.S. also and people with a mind set like that of Thomas More's here are the reason why that continues.
I suppose that this whole global warming scam isn't all bad if it can get people to conserve energy the way that we should have been all along anyway.
He's in a big box that I shipped to outer mongolia.
Hmm... Seems to me that not reproducing is also unsustainable, and will also lead to a human population of zero...
I've heard a number of times about periods in which the earth's population was contracting, (plagues and such), and it was a benefit to the less affluent - Labour and skills shortages and competitive wages and affordable food and housing and all that. A slowdown in population growth sure isn't hurting China any.
KEM, what did you do to McMackarel? Something to do with curbing populaton growth?
Egads, I have three daughters, all schooled in conservation and ecology, we live in an energy efficient home, compost, put hardly anything out for garbage, drive infrequently, bike/walk, are not overweight, don't smoke, grow our own food, volunteer (yes, all of us) in the community, rarely buy anything new...let the public stoning of me begin for my irresponsible choices.
I'd guess you're probably thankful your mommy didn't decide to not over-populate ~YOHOCOMA~. Hope you take our own advice, would sure hate to see a copy.
Think harder ~Yoho. __ Ho.
Parallax...are you volunteering?
You are absolutely correct about over population ~PARALLAX~. If we humans don't correct the problem of adding excessive amounts of Co2 into our atmosphere however, over population will soon become a moot issue as I can assure you, the human population will decrease to zero.
~THOMAS MORE~ try this home experiment. Go outside and find and pick up a small egg sized rock in one hand and in your other hand pick up a dried dog turd. Study them closely, until you dectect they are different in many ways. You may detect they may smell different, feel different and look different. You don't have to lick them to see if they taste different, they probably would. If you do notice they are different, you have sucessfully passed the home expermient test.
That's like global warming and climate change, ~THOMAS~__ the two are different!!__ Global warming causes climate change and it has been WELL proven global warming is a scientific fact.
Global warming is why the world's mountain glaciers are now melting and many have totally disappeared. One which was over 90 feet thick four years ago is now only 9 feet thick. Which is almost as thick as some peoples skulls. It is also causing the Arctic's perma-frost to melt and the methane gas which WILL escape into our atmosphere will kill you and any children you may have.
As soon as possible the human beings on this globe need to realize that the only way we can have any hope of doing something about global warming is to decrease the population. I have always had great respect for Chinese people, (although their government leaves much to be desired). China has instituted a policy of one-child-per-family and such a policy should apply everywhere in the world for the next two or three generations in order to bring the global population to a level that the earth can sustain. Either we humans take control of our destiny or nature will do it for us - thirst, starvation, drowning, asphyxiation, &c.
As it is, the little things we do to try to reduce our impact on the environment, such as those mentioned in the posts above, are all swamped by the demands of increased population.
Someone mentioned inflating your car tires properly but not how to do this. On most cars the 'correct' inflation pressure is shown on the car door jam. Doing just this is good and would save America 2.8 billions of gas every year. To maximize your mileage inflate your tires to the maximum recommended pressure shown on the side of the tire. Every 1 psi low on your tires equals almost 1/2 a mpg.
I wish that Ms. Schulman would realize that one of the most effective things she can do, that would give her the most agency, that would imperil her children the least, is to STOP BREEDING.
What is it with this disconnect so many people have about increasing the world's population and resource use? Schulman even got the conservation mojo at the time of her first child's birth, because of worry about that child's future, yet she created at least one more!
I'm afraid that Schulman, for all her enlightenedness, might be in the egoistic mindrut that so many other of our culture are, which goes something like this:
"I'm cutting back, I'm insulating my house, I'm driving less, I'm spreading the gospel, but I'll be damned if I give up my god-given innate human right to make little copies of myself."
Think harder, Ms. Schulman.
Some parts of the world will get cooler with global warming-Thomas More-more parts will get warmer. The average global temperature is what is getting warmer.
"I became paralyzed with fear about climate disruption. It was so clear that our children would be punished for what we adults were doing to the world."
I simply wonder how it became clear to him when its not to me.
Theres nothing wrong with conservation, using less energy or any of the other things suggested here.
But to suggest that there is enough scientific evidence or agreement as to what or if anything is happening to our climate is simply not true.
A few years ago I was told that "Global Warming" was happening for all our sins, recently I notice its evolved into "Climate Change" as we've actually been cooling. Melting tundra on one end, expanding ice on the other. Bio fuels was a great idea, we were assured it was win-win. Oops, apparently not. Not just food, but the energy produced is both a net energy loser and money loser.
It seems to me we should go a bit slower and be more careful not to make mistakes. I'm not saying any of these theories are wrong, just that so far there is no proof.
Making believe there is or telling others there is absolute, scientific proof of any of them is just not true.
Remember the florocarbons?
KEM: Thanks for the link to the methane article (although it's quite terrifying!).
Big_Money: Are you joshing? Is "Mcmackle" a figment of someone's imagination, like "Kilroy" (who "was here") during WW II?
civil behavior-great suggestions. We've been using cloth bags for several years now-of course, for the first year, REMEMBERING to bring them in from the car was a problem. Now I'm planning to reuse my neighbor's old child bike trailer to haul groceries during nice weather.
I got him. McMackel is history. HAAAAAAAAAAAAA, haaaaaaaaaaaa, I got em. haaa haaaaaaaaaa. Whoop.
The most Co2 emissions by far are from burning COAL and vehicle exhausts. Those actions by mankind emit as much Co2 as 17,000 volcanos the size of Hawaii's Kilauea, according to the National Geologial Society.
The only solution is immediate steps taken "world wide", to have totally clean energy from Geo-thermal, wind, solar, wave and tidal. If we ignore it, as Audry so well informed us with this article, our kids won't have a chance at a fair life and that's not fair. ___ We're running out of time.
Which is to say, I can't see him now either... Kinda makes me feel like I look like I'm standing on a streetcorner writing rebuttals at no-one in particular...
AdeleTheCzech April 27th, 2008 4:17 pm
By the way, every commenter here seems to refer to a "mcmackle" — yet I can't find his/her post.
---
Gosh, I'd swear he was just here... He was a standard issue Gore-bashing AGW Denier... Do people actually just disappear without a trace, like that?
Americans are each responsible for about 22 tons of CO2 a year. If we want to stabilize the climate, each person needs to produce only 2 tons a year.
A third of US carbon emissions come from transportation. Start with driving only when necessary.
Then:
Stop using disposable plastic cups
Unplug your computer every night for one month. Unless it's unplugged, your idle PC still uses electricity.
Cut out the number of catalogs jamming your mailbox this year
Cut down on new wrapping paper. Wrap 6 of your holiday gifts in reused material like newspaper.
Avoid using plastic shopping bags. Decline fancy shopping bags from stores. Get in the habit of carrying a canvas bag or mesh net bag.
Pick one day this week to leave your car at home and use another way to commute to work or school.
Replace just 3 of the regular light bulbs in your home with Compact Fluorescent Light bulbs.
Instead of creeping your car along in the drive-thru lane, park it. Go inside to order your food or make your bank deposit.
Do you sit in the car and keep it running when you pick the kids up from school? Make it a school wide initiative. Talk to the school and see how they can plan to get everyone to shut off their cars!
Wipe the bottom of a tea kettle free from water before heating
Shower one less minute
Properly inflate your automobile tires.
Finally, reject empire, choose earth community.
Empire is to blame for the thoughtless, shameless, egregious consumption of finite resources by Americans that has been going on for at least two centuries, merely I might add, for their own selfish pleasure and profit.
The change starts with Americans who at 4% of the worlds population and having selfishly consumed 25% of the worlds resources, make a commitment to steward and conserve and yes, sacrifice to achieve a more equitable balance of the use of resources in all its forms so that all may participate in a more sustainable way a standard of living by allocating the basic dignities of life.
If you don't choose to do so, and very soon, our very own Mother Nature will choose for you, and she is a harsh mistress. She will not stand by and continue to be abused and exploited. This isn't like man's dominion over others. She will exact her just amount of due. And it is coming due.
Join the bandana revolution! Show your support for Earth community by wearing, tying or showing a bandana daily. Let's see how many of us are the real earth citizens.
Thank you for a very fine article Audry. For one thing I never had heard about the "by-stander effect". Every little thing we each alone do to help the climate is very important.
In addition to our actions, there is another MOST important element which must be addressed and soon.__ Very soon.___ Our atmosphere is overloaded with Co2, as we have all heard by now.
The pollution we humans have put into our atmosphere does not evaporate within a few short years. It is very possible we are breathing air which contains Co2, which was emitted from Henry Ford's first model T or the Civil War's Monitor and Merrimack.
The Co2 from burning fossil fuels, gas and oil, has created the "Green House" effect on our water planet's biosphere and heat cannot properly escape from our upper atmosphere as it should. The result is global warming. The global warmng in turn is causing dramatic climate changes and melting ice at the Earth's poles and mountain glaciers all over the globe. All of that is important.
The most iportant item of all, the most serious issue by far facing ALL of mankind, is the methane gas safely locked up in the Arctic perma-frost. "Safely" locked up beneath layers of ice is the KEY.
Recenty some Russian scientists were shocked at what they were witnessing while in the Arctic while studylng the situation. Large lakes which had been frozen over for more than five million years were ice free and methane gas was boiling the lakes surface waters as it billowed out into the atmosphere.
Just "exactly" how serious is that? ___ well, it couldn't be more serious if you trust the words of a world renouned geologist, who wrote the article I will offer here in a link. Perhaps the most impressive sentence in his artice is, "Once it starts, there is NO turning back, once it begins to "Burp" out, there are NO do-overs it will likely play itself out."
If he's correct and there is no sensible reason for me to doubt him, we have a problem and it is without question, the MOST serious probem humanity faces. That humanity BTW, includes our children and any they may have.
This article is a two minute read.
Http://www.energybulletin.net/3647.html
I have taken the liberty of free speech, to post that link several times here at C/D. In the off chance some may not have seen it on other threads. So for those who may show up here and have been critical of my constant bitching on the most important issue we face. Please just ignore me and do whatever turns you on.
What a lot of good, practical ideas in these posts. Here's another conservation possibility:
Years ago we bought a rundown, solidly-built old house because it's on a hill facing south, with a big back yard overlooking other hills. We extended the house 6 feet at the rear (along 34 running feet) and added big insulated windows to enjoy the view. Well, talk about dumb luck -- I don't know how many thousands of gallons of heating oil we've saved over the years because of the gazillions of BTUs of passive solar heat!
So many houses have at least a partial southern exposure; if yours does, consider what insulated windows might do in terms of energy savings. Furthermore, many states have rebate programs for replacement windows (double or triple glass, filled with argon gas), which really helps with affordability.
By the way, every commenter here seems to refer to a "mcmackle" -- yet I can't find his/her post. I just have an ordinary Dell PC running Windows XP. Am I missing something?
whatfools -- you say you're putting your rebate into Euros. How does one do that safely, and without incurring large bank fees? Many thanks for any info you can provide.
Along with using washable cloth napkins to save the trees, Cut up old towels, and save worn out dish towels, and other soft cloths to use in place of paper towels, for house cleaning chores, car washing, etc.
Buy or make bags to use when shopping to replace paper bags and most especially the plastic ones. Keep them on your front car seat to remind you when you go shopping to use them.
I turned off my water heater and I'm off to buy a Sun Shower. Every little bit helps.
I'll put my 'stimulus' in Euros along with my tax refund since this Bushbribe myst be repaid with interest.
Each small thing we do helps. Using reusable cloth napkins saves trees. When I find volunteer trees from seeds in places where they will not survive or are not placed well, I replant them in a pot and care for them until they reach four feet tall and then replant them where they will grow undisturbed. Place a container like a coffee container etc., between your garden plants. Drill three holes in the bottom and water your garden by filling up the containers thus not wasting water and distributing water to your plants over time and more directly. I like to dig my containers into the ground somewhat.
Place a stone or brick nest to each plant thus retaining more moisture in the soil. Use water from a rain barrel or a nearby clean creek to water your plants. Mix clay mud and put it into holes bored into your trees by insects or cracks that may have occurred from drought or storm damage. Do this as needed and avoid insecticides. Your tree will thank you.
I too have chosen not to replace my personal car. We have one car in the family and we use it as sparingly as possible, and that car was not bought new.
I built my home thirty years ago and insulated it then to R-19 walls and R-36 ceiling and I used rock wool which is treated used newspaper. I also installed a heat pump when they were very new. My current heat pump is over 20 years old and going strong.
Our home temperatures are kept very moderate and I use a very small fan at my desk and work area.
Large trees that I planted now shade my home from the hot afternoon sun and from the north winter wind.
All dead wood branches are placed in a pile to preserve wildlife. I use available wood to make bird houses and feeders. I am working on a bat house now. I also make cold weather bird shelters. They shelter birds of many different kinds during the coldest winter nights. Birds too cooperate when they have to. I feed them as well. They reward me by keeping my lawn insect pests to minimum. I use no herbicides or insecticides.
Each little thing we do helps all of us.
Retire Green-I choose to work 3 afternoons a week, in my home, teaching piano, instead of working 40 hours a week, driving to a place of employment-most of my students are neighbor kids who walk or bike to my house. In our extended families, this choice is seen as "lazy" or me being a "mooch" on my husband because if I made more money, we could buy more stuff. Instead, we live a very comfortable life on my husband's salary (in a job he loves) and I am available to my school-age kids 24/7, am available to volunteer at local nonprofits and am available to my neighbors. Unfortunately, our families subscribe more to to mcmackle's way of thinking. We just keep on doing what we know is right.
Further, mcmackle, do you think y2k was no biggie because the bank's computers would have worked fine if no-one had cared, or because the banks "selfishly" employed people to fix them?
mcmackle - you're the one that's been "hoaxed". If you'd open your eyes, you'd see that this involves money for no-one. Those who say we need to consume less will not profit if people do so. They are not "hoaxing" you. No-one will profit from reduced consumption. No-one will profit if you weather-seal your home. The money you wouldn't waste heating the outdoors is for you. You. The government can't even tax you on the money you get because you didn't waste it. You get this? Or is the sound of Rush in your ears to loud to hear even that? You're the one who's been "hoaxed" - they want you to keep on wasting your money for the benefit of the people who pay money to portray this serious problem as a "hoax".
There are millions of Audreys out there. We, and the earth, need every one of them.
Hoa binh
Audrey says: "I insulate my house fanatically. I don't own a car. Every year I do a little more: composting kitchen waste, shopping at farmers' markets, recycling, buying only secondhand. Using carbon calculators, I've figured that I've lowered my family's emissions 50 percent in seven years."
I could say almost exactly the same thing! I know, someone's gonna come and call me "smug". But anyone with a fat-ass western lifestyle can do this. I plan to do it again in the next seven years.
Retire Green says: "Reducing consumption, contrary to what many believe, is not reducing lifestyle. It can be acheived by eliminating waste." Yes, yes and yes. YES! No cold drafts on the feet, no brittle dry or muggy wet air. Better tasting food. Used stuff functions as well as new stuff. (except maybe electronics - and new ones use less energy, if you're careful.) And all the money saved goes into more joyful things than waste and inefficiency.
Buy some caulking. Use it until you can't find another draft to put it in. If you have to drive, be gentle on the accelerator. Use a clothesline. It's easy to make a big difference.
Excellent article.
It's articles like this that makes me wish Common Dreams had a more dynamic bulletin board system so we could keep some of these discussions going long after the current ones scroll off the screen...and our consciousness.
I think Ramsay has it right (good to see you back, Ramsay). We need to consume less - after all, it is consumption that drives global climate change. I am working on this every day, and let me tell you, it isn't easy. It isn't easy because our culture makes it hard not to. It tells us 24/7, from cradle to grave, that we are consumers and that is the natural state of affairs. Of course, most here know that our culture lies to us. It does so through the media, our teachers, our peers, advertisements everywhere, and even through plants like mcmackle, our newly acquired troll.
Of course, if we understand that our culture is based on consumption and that it lies to us, we can also understand that it is up to us as individuals to break this cycle. There are as many ways to do this as there are individuals, and many of us are doing similar things...and they do make a difference. For instance, my wife and I worked and put extra money into paying down out mortgage until we no longer had a mortgage. This has allowed me to get a job closer to home and one which fits my belief system more. We compost and garden and share our garden with another. We reuse and recycle and buy used things whenever possible, or we do without. We turned down the thermostat and walk more and drive a fuel efficient car (Prius) and hundreds of other things, large and small. And that's the thing...the small things do add up. Like a grain of sand, they add up to become a whole beach.
As for the Y2k reference - it's bogus. Y2k would have been a catastrophe had in not been headed off. I was a computer programmer during Y2k and worked on remediation and testing to make sure my electric utility company could keep supplying power. Millions of companies around the world spent billions of dollars remediating Y2k so that it wouldn't become the problem some warned about. They weren't fools, they knew that it HAD to be done, and so, it was.
It's a good thing that people weren't paralyzed then, like mcmackle seems to be, and it's a good thing that people are coming out of their paralytic stupor about global climate change. Evidently, some people prefer to remain in a stupor. Let's let them. They'll be asking for our help later.
Leadership
It is leadership by one person that can move many people into action.
Set off your own chain reaction by being a leader. You don't have to do much. Speak up when someone is saying that global warming is not a big deal. Stop using the Republican words "climate change" and keep using the stronger words "global warming" to describe the situation. Post on blogs. Start a sustainable energy blog and research what is going on. Find an issue you have an interest in and tell other people about it.
We all have the ability to be the leaders who stand up first and move other people to action. We need lots of leaders because we need a huge chain reaction to break the Bystander Effect. This includes you so think right now about something you can do to make this world a more sustainable place for ourselves and our children to live.
How To Be A Climate Hero:
Great article. There is something everyone can do to become a climate hero - Consume Less. It doesn't matter what it is; meat, clothes, house, t.v.'s, frozen pizza. Over consumption of earth's natural resources is the underlying problem.
You see my blog handle at the top of this post? It's not there by accident. Do the World a Favor and Retire! Retirement is one of the best things you can personally do for the environment. When you retire, your consumption of resources declines dramatically, helping to slow global warming. And if you retire green, you can retire with much less savings, and earlier.
Consumption is the problem - Conservation is the solution.
One other point:
Reducing consumption, contrary to what many believe, is not reducing lifestyle. It can be acheived by eliminating waste. The U.S. is 5% of the the World's population, yet we consume 25% of it's resources, we are wasting resources. Imagine the effect if we Americans, sorry Canada, could reduce our per capita consumption in half.
Ramsay
It seems to me that if we are to save this planet for continued human existence, we have to have highly motivated people. I have been hearing about reaching, passing the "tipping point" for several years. If we are to do anything to change the current situation, then I think saying that we are at or past the tipping point is only counter-productive as I can think of nothing that is more likely to de-motivate people, than the idea that it's too late to do anything about stopping this situation.
Certainly my comment is not meant to suggest that someone doesn't have the right to say such a thing, it is just I want people to think about the effects of such comments. Think twice about it, and then ask what is the purpose of your comment? If it is anything other than to get people to do something positive, then why not reconsider? If you want to motivate people, then please leave that part about the "tipping point" out.
The truth is (and you can call me a horrible person if you'd like), nothing you or I can do ON THE LEVEL OF THE PHYSICAL PLANE (like driving less, or even not driving at all, or replacing a few incandescents with fluorescents, or paying for carbon credits, or recycling, or voting for this candidate or that one) will be anything more than symbolic. Whether you or I ride bikes or walk or ride camels or drive has absolutely ZERO bearing on what will happen in the foreseeable future. It is just too damn late.
My suggestions? Take it off the physical plane altogether.
Pray. Deeply. Sincerely. All the fucking time.
Be as conscious as you can be. All the fucking time.
And be happy.
All the fucking time.
obstacle
tinylotus-We did do the sterilization. And while I haven't adopted, I feed a multitude of children at lunchtime every summer-they seem to appear at our house right at the noon hour (we have quite a few low-income dense housing w/in a mile of our home). And these kids love to go and nibble in my vegetable gardens, have no problem helping to weed, etc.
ricshev-I tried that logic on my mom when I was growing up. Why should I have to make my bed?-I was just going to mess it up again. Sometimes, you do things because they are right not because they are easy and not because it will make a difference in the grand scheme of things.
You may quote me on this: "CONTROL YOUR EXCESSES!" How hard is that? Consume less, reproduce less, rape and plunder less, put less energy into turning the GARDEN the earth once was into a TOILET ... Kinda feel this must be what a loving, involved God would be thinking about now.
Kim, the methane problem is deeply troubling because with people it takes time to change their minds. The methane problem does not allow for time. I believe we are heading for a paradigm shift in human evolution. I anticipate that people will experiences forces that they have never experienced in their lifetimes. Learning how to process these forces may be key to one's survival. I would suggest that those who can hear should learn more about 2012. There is some "there" there.
At 60 mph versus 70mph, you save __10%__ on fuel consumption. If you have a vehicle that averages 30 mpg, after 10,000 annual miles at a fuel cost of $3.50 a gallon, you will have saved almost $1,200. __ At $4.00 a gallon, you save over $1,300.
In ten years, that's a savings of $12 to $13 thousand, but of course a loss for travel time of almost three hours a year. Actually, $1,200 for three hours time is fairly good wages,___ unless you're my lawyer or othtamologist.
How do you spell obstical?
I'm starting to feel depressed. We have two children also, much to my now shame. If I go shoot two of my Republican neighbors, will that make up for it?
Reducing personal consumption through recyling, driving less, weather-sealing homes, etc. are commendable, feel-good exercises. In terms of dealing with climate change through the reduction in GHG, such actions are almost entirely symbolic. For example, the the GHG emissions from the Alberta Tar Sands - the so-called Saudi Arabia of the North - equals the emissions from ten million cars. The Tar Sands, probably the single largest industrial project on the planet and certainly, given its huge scale, the most environmentally destructive, is being developed principally by US oil companies to supply the American market. The pine beetle infestation in British Columbia, a feed-back loop caused by global heating (winters are no longer cold enough to kill off the bug), will release millions of tons of carbon into the atmosphere as over seventy-five percent of the interior pine forest die off and the trees rot. China is adding one new coal-fired electrical station to its grid every week and, along with India, gearing up to produce tens of millions of cars, many of which will be purchased by these countries burgeoning middle classes, adding to the world's net emissions of GHGs.
Clearly, recyling and riding our bikes to work will not solve the problem of anthropic climate change.
I wonder how many of CD bloggers have had vasectomies/tubes tied?....if not...well, become a hero with that one selfless act...adopt if you have the uncontrollable urge to parent...( i did have this urge and did tie the tubes and adopt...i did this after reading Silent Spring when it first came out)
i became a vegetarian after raising and killing my steer and then reading Diet for a Small Planet...when it first came out...
i have set up tables with information on deforestation, nuclear energy, solar energy,electric vehicles, steam vehicles etc. at campuses, post office buildings,and markets...since 1976...
it is a pleasure to see all of u...happy to have u on board...
I'm in this late, but need to add an element that has been missing, far as I can tell: War's effect on the environment. Not only do their vehicles and other equipment use gargantuan amounts of fossil fuel, the extent of pollution by the US military is staggering. Here's just one link for info:
http://scienceforpeace.sa.utoronto.ca/Essays_Briefs/Hamel/Hamel-EnvironWar.html