The Prostitute and the Moderators -- A Suggestion
Was this the face that launched a thousand ships,
And burnt the topless towers of Ilium?
Sweet Helen, make me immortal with a kiss.
Her lips suck forth my soul; see, where it flies!
Christopher Marlowe, The Tragical History of Doctor Faustus [1604]
* * *
Lowest common denominator. That's what George Stephanopolous and Charles Gibson of ABC news were appealing to during the first half of the debate for which they recently served as moderators. That explains the reason for the really dumb questions they not only posed but pursued with remarkable, if mindless, persistency about lapel pins, helicopter landings, bitter people and sermons, none of which has the slightest relevance to determining which of the debaters would be a better president. (George Bush never appears in public without his American flag lapel pin and few believe he was a good president. Hillary Clinton never appears in public with a lapel pin and that does not suggest she would be a bad president). Since appealing to the lowest common denominator was the goal of Messrs. Gibson and Stephanopolous, I have a suggestion for a future program that will draw even more viewers than did the debate and will appeal to an even lower common denominator. They should interview Ashley Youmans for an hour and a half.
Ashley Youmans, now known as Ashley Alexandra Dupré is the woman whose face, metaphorically speaking, brought down an empire. Or at least a governorship. Ashley is the young woman at the center of the Eliot Spitzer scandal.
Without casting aspersions on either of the two presidential candidates who debated (each of whom is well dressed and attractive) all would agree that to the extent anything interesting was elicited from the candidates by their inquisitors, it was unrelated to what they were wearing. It is safe to assume, on the other hand, that no matter how pathetic the questioning, Ashley would have made a better visual impression than either of the candidates, especially if she had been counseled to attire herself in such a way as to display those attributes that make her both interesting and successful. Furthermore, she could provide information that would be of interest to lots of viewers, especially those with mildly prurient interests that encompasses more viewers than the viewers would like to admit.
Since the economy is undeniably in a slump, she could have explained how competitive pricing works in the industry in which she is employed, thus introducing transparency to a profession that frequently operates in the dark. It would almost certainly be of interest to the viewer to know and understand why, for example, radio executive, Tom Athans, of Michigan, who is married to U.S. Senator Debbie Stabenow and was recently arrested in a Residence Inn near Big Beaver and Interstate 75 (no double entendre intended and apologies to Kurt Vonnegut) paid a woman engaged in Ashley's line of work only $150 whereas Mr. Spitzer reportedly paid Ashley $4300. It is not adequate to attribute the difference in price to depressed economic conditions in Michigan nor can it be attributed solely to the length of the encounter. As an examination of the rate structure of Ashley's company set out below demonstrates, for $150 at her employer one would get little more than a cup of water with which to down a Viagra pill.
It would be interesting to hear Ashley explain, in response to questions from the ABC team, the details of the price list formerly displayed on the Emperors Club Website. (The site uses the apostrophe sparingly and inconsistently.) The quality of the services are, as restrooms at gas stations were in days gone by, measured by diamonds and, conveniently, (as gas stations were not) in dollars, euros and pounds so that prospective customers know what to expect. The rates are either hourly or by the day. A 3 diamond encounter of one hour's duration costs $1000 or 700 Euros whereas a 7 diamond encounter of the same length costs $3,100 or 2200 Euros. (Based on today's exchange rates it makes more sense to pay in dollars.) Day rates that are described as "dawn to dawn" range from $10,000 to $31,000.
Ashley could have discussed competitive pricing, variation in pricing depending on locales, and how income is shared between Emperors and its subjects.
There will be readers who suggest that such a program would be a waste of time since only those of prurient interest would want to watch. To them I can only say Gibson and Stephanopolous offered so little worthwhile in their one and a half hours that any subject, no matter how trivial, would be an improvement. Would it were otherwise.
Christopher Brauchli; For political commentary see http://humanraceandothersports.com
Delicious
Digg
StumbleUpon
Newsvine
Facebook
Google
Yahoo
Technorati
19 Comments so far
Show AllThe sad, sad conclusion of all this is that there are a very considerable number of Americans out there who will believe this c#$@ and vote accordingly.
Why oh why did I waste 2 minutes of my life skimming this inane garbage.
Can anyone help me get those two minutes back?
What is going unmentioned is how the Clinton's helped Disney during Bill's presidency with two acts of legislation: the 1996 Telecommunications Act & the 1998 Digital Millennium Act (otherwise known as the Disney Copyright Act). The conduct of Gibson & Stephanopoulus was merely a cost-effective pay-off of a debt.
I swim upstream. I love this piece by Mr. Brauchli.
Ashley on the tee vee discussing competitive pricing, rate structures, monetary comparisons of the dollar, Euro, 'dawn-to-dawn' day rates, locales, income sharing !!
A brilliant article. The screaming comments (Yay Hilary, Boo Hilary, Yay Obama, Boo Obama) above underline the result of lowest common demoninator media.
Read, people.
Maybe its me, and my selection of stories, but I always seem to be reading about how vapid the coverage of the presidential election is. Yet the stories never change that, they never get into the substance of the candidates' arguments or experience. We have the coverage of a horse race, and then the coverage of the coverage. I would prefer stories which could make their criticism of the mainstream in a couple paragraphs and then spend the rest discussing the matters which they say are being left out of the discussion. Is that too much to ask?
Great title. I was sure you meant Clinton as the prostitute.
She is more like a pimp though.
I'm not a Hillary Clinton supporter, although I think it would be best in the short run for her to win this cycle and not Obama - I'll vote for Cynthia McKinney or Ralph Nader. I've hated the tone of Obama supporters demonization of Hillary Clinton. Substantive arguments aren't being made because they have similar flaws in their policy positions.
I would echo the question as to the reason for this article. If it is a call to restore the debates to the pervue of the League of Women Voters, I second that call wholeheartedly.
Our presidential campaigns have become increasingly irrelevent, but then again, our candidates for that office have become the same, so I guess the campaigns mirror the quality of the candidates as well. Hopefully, some day, we will awaken to the realisation that our governmental processes have been stolen from us while we frolicked with our cheap toys ,purchased on credit that has made us subservient and easily controlled...perhaps some day.
And the point of this story was exactly what, please?
Pro-Clinton commentators to this (and other) sites now sound as inane as pro-Bush commentators. But maybe I'm not sly enough to see the Clinton-as-prostitute angle in the article (what?). Obama knows that he's the one walking the minefield now. There's simply no way he would get away with Senator Clinton's kneecap policy if the tables were turned so he's got to answer questions as calmly and diplomatically as possible. Her campaign is behind 90% of the negativity but it's played like it's even.
How come that blond from "K" street who was linked to McCain has fallen off the Earth? Wasn't it shown that McCain lied and his own people were concerned that he was boning the broad?
The Republicans own the corporate media, so stories that weaken a candidate only seem to get repeated there if they damage Democrats.
George and Charlie are paid millions to do what Disney says. And Disney does what Cheneybush tells them to.
Stop blaming George and Charlie - if Disney or Rupert or Sumner handed us a million bucks, most of us would roll over and play moron in half-a-heartbeat. Hell, most of us would do what we're told for a f**king mortgage payment at this point...
Meanwhile, for the, er, less experienced, ultimately, $150 or $10,000 gets ya the same thing - it's called laid. Period.
The candidates are prostitutes.
Hoa binh
In fact, the "debate" was a golden opportunity for Obama to show a bit of anger, a flash of indignation at the two pimp moderators, and to refuse to participate in the bumper-sticker drivel about flag-pins, etc. He could have cut Ma Clinton off at the knees that night. But he didn't and he won't. If Mr. Brauchli believes that hookers and pin-up girls are more interesting and more pertinent than talking fungi, he has a point.
Yawn! What tripe!
And so it goes. Year after year. Decade after decade. One US "election" follows another with the same focus on inane trivia between and amongst the "candidates" pre-approved and set before the "electorate" by the establishment system.
Will people ever awaken to the "greatest democracy on earth's" true realities of "manufactured consent" and "popular legitimization" of agendas not their own? (Purely rhetorical question.)
"Lowest common denominator" may be the key words of explanation on why the ABC debate was mostly held to a lame class of subjects. Viewers, they have probably noted, also tune into Springer, soap operas, smackdowns, and "reality" and "contest" shows where somebody is getting thrown off of something. Same viewers might love hearing from Ashley
I still say, though, that the low point of the debate was not the first half on pins, pastors, bitter comments etc. It was in the second half where those two guys (who ought to know better) sought to put both candidates in a box on taxes relating to SPECIFIC levels of income. Dumb, dumber and dumber still when we have a country that needs so many things fixed.
What garbage! How about he could have explained? Obamaniacs are so delusional! Stop demonizing Hillary Clinton! Defend your candidate based on his actual record and his ideas! Only he doesn't really have any good ones, does he?? How sly & clever of you to equate the prostitute with Hillary Clinton! Grow up!
I still do not understand how "journalists" like George Stephanopolous and Charles Gibson of ABC news still have a job. And I am pretty sure that they will be promoted in the future. It is the same ssss all over the world.
Thanks to Christopher Brauchli for keeping the Spitzer scandal alive and relevant until such time as we can get the feature-length movie into the theaters. Casting has its challenges, but this is what it looks like for now:
Gov. Elliot Spitzer.......... William H. Macy
Silda Wall Spitzer........... Jennifer Anniston
Elyssa Spitzer............... Mary Kate Olsen
Sara Beth Spitzer............ Evan Rachel Wood
Jenna Spitzer................ Kristen Stewart
Ashley Dupre
('Kristen')............ Nikki Reed
Ashley's Mother in NJ........ Frances McDormand
Ashley's Boyfriend........... Emile Hirsch
NY Times News Editor......... David Straitharn
NY Times Reporter............ Reese Witherspoon
Desk Clerk
At Mayflower Hotel in DC..
Joseph Bruno,
NY State Senate........ Jack Nicholson
Sheldon Silver,
NY State Assembly...... Sydney Pollack
US Magistrate................ Alan Arkin
Assistant US Attorney........
Tameka R. Lewis
(Emperor's Club Agent).... Jamie Lee Curtis
The Other Girls of the Emperor's Club
Angelina Jolie, Tyra Banks, Chloë Sevigny,
Lindsay Lohan, Beyoncé Knowles, Scarlett Johansson