How I Learned to Start Worrying and Loathe the Bomb
It took more than four years just to excavate and construct that mountain redoubt outside of Colorado Springs, that Cold War citadel whose two huge blast doors weighed 25 tons each. Within its confines, under 2,000 feet of Rocky Mountain granite, fifteen buildings were constructed, each mounted on steel springs, each spring weighing nearly half a ton, so that, when the Soviet nukes exploded, each building would sway but not collapse.
When it became operational in 1966, the Cheyenne Mountain Complex was the ultimate bomb shelter. Its 200 or so crewmembers were believed to have a 70% likelihood of surviving a five-megaton blast with a three-mile circular error of probability, even if the surrounding countryside became an irradiated wasteland. Today, over four decades later, the Complex remains an important command center, though last year the military announced that it would now serve primarily as a back-up facility (on "warm stand-by," in military jargon).
From 1985 to 1988, in the waning years of the Cold War, as a young Air Force lieutenant, my job took me inside that mountain citadel. The approach to it wasn't in any way awesome, since the mountain, at the south end of the Front Range of Colorado Springs, is overshadowed by Pike's Peak. Except for all the communication antennae blinking red at night, you'd hardly know that it was the site of a major command center for a future nuclear war. Yet each time I drove up its access road, its solid, granite bulk made an impression; so, too, did the security fence topped by cameras and razor wire, the security police toting M-16s, and the massive access tunnel, bored out of solid rock and paved for vehicular traffic that still leads inside the mountain to the actual command centers.
Like cereal box atomic decoder rings and "duck and cover" exercises, the Complex is a relic of the Cold War era. I entered on a bus which, though painted Air Force blue, was similar to the ones I had taken in grade school. On a few nights, I left work after the last bus took off and so had to hike the third of a mile out of the tunnel, a claustrophobic and often bone-chilling experience in the windy and wintry Rockies -- until, that is, you emerged into a starry night above with the lights of the city twinkling below.
Of that "mountain," meant to corral and contain our nuclear fears, what struck most first-time visitors were the huge steel-reinforced blast doors, ten-feet high and several feet thick. They were supposed to seal the Complex, protecting it from a nuclear strike. Then, there were the enormous springs (1,319 in all) upon which each of the 15 separate buildings inside that mountain rest. I liked to think of them as giant (if immobile) Slinkies. As visitors got their bearings and looked around, they were sometimes disconcerted by the bolts embedded in the granite walls and ceiling. These held wire mesh, meant to stabilize the rock and protect against falling shards. Lots of exposed pipes and cables gave the mountain a style that might be termed "early industrial chic" -- and one that you sometimes see echoed today in high-end lofts and dance clubs.
The blast doors were usually open -- except, of course, during "exercises," when the mountain "buttoned up" its self-contained world. Along with enough food and other provisions to weather any initial rounds of Earthly devastation, the mountain also had four freshwater reservoirs, each with a total holding capacity of 1.5 million gallons. The inside joke was that the Complex, technically an Air Force station, had its very own navy -- the row boats used to cross the reservoirs (though, sad to say, I never used one). Today, when I think of them, the River Styx and Charon come to mind.
Images of the underworld were then, and remain, all too appropriate. By the time I was inside Cheyenne Mountain, we knew it was vulnerable to a new generation of high-yield, highly accurate Soviet Intercontinental Ballistic Missiles (ICBMs). In case of a full-fledged nuclear war, as a popular poster of the 1970s put it, we had no doubt that any of us could "bend over and kiss your ass goodbye."
The citadel that had been built to ensure official survival during a planetary holocaust was, by then, sure to be among the initial targets struck by those ICBMs -- perhaps a dozen or more warheads -- to ensure a "first strike kill." Our job was simply to detect the coming nuclear attack by the Soviets and act quickly enough to coordinate a retaliatory strike -- to ensure that the Soviet part of the planet went down -- before we, too, were obliterated, along with Colorado Springs (a "target-rich" city that includes Fort Carson to the south, Peterson Air Force Base to the east, and the U.S. Air Force Academy to the north).
Launched over the North Pole from missile fields in the USSR, those Soviet ICBMs would explode over American cities in 30 minutes. Reacting before they hit placed a premium on decisions based on computers and early warning satellites. Due to the hair-trigger nature of such a scenario, human errors and system malfunctions were inevitable. One false alarm came on November 9, 1979, when a technician mistakenly loaded a "training tape" that simulated a full-scale Soviet missile attack. Two false alarms followed less than a year later on June 3 and June 6, 1980 and were eventually traced -- according to an official Air Force release -- to a defective integrated circuit, a silicon chip costing less than $100. In each case, the Strategic Air Command (SAC) alerted ICBM crews and scrambled air crews to nuclear-armed B-52s, which were warming up engines for takeoff before the alarms were rescinded.
Mountain Men
Cheyenne Mountain was something more than a bastion to seal in our nuclear fears. It was also a repository of our technological dreams and a response (however feeble) to our technological nightmares. In this high-tech, man-made cave, we could for a moment forget how hydrogen bombs had reduced the bravest of warriors to inconsequential matter. To this end, we cultivated a quiet professionalism -- a studied detachment from our surroundings as well as the implications of Cold War deterrence theory.
That said, working within the mountain was decidedly unglamorous. Obviously, there were no windows, so no natural light. Air circulated artificially (and noisily). As big as that cavern sometimes seemed, space was often at a premium in a complex manned 24/7 -- with at least a brigadier general always on duty in case the "nuclear balloon" went up. (I recall one quiet mid-shift where I read several chapters of Tom Clancy's Red Storm Rising -- the irony was not lost on me.) Crewmembers sat in the Missile Warning Center in front of consoles, processing data from satellites and other sensors. The most vital of these were the super secret DSP satellites used to detect Soviet missile launches. I worked mostly in the Space Surveillance Center, which kept track of the objects orbiting Earth (including lost wrenches and shattered satellites) -- tedious, but necessary work that involved weekly software "crashes."
The men and women who served in the Complex were anything but Strangelovean. The U.S. strategy of that time, known as Mutually Assured Destruction (which boiled down to the distinctly Strangelovean acronym of MAD), may have been comical in an obscenely dark way, but the crewmembers themselves did their duty with little fanfare. Like them, I was caught up in "the mission," in making everything work, even if everything included a potentially world-ending event. We all -- each in his or her own mundane way -- became servants of the early warning machinery of nuclear war. We were, as technology critic Lewis Mumford might have put it then, "encapsulated men" serving the Pentagonal megamachine.
"Manly" military glory was still an ever-present ideal in those years; but, as we all were well aware, it lay somewhere beyond the mountain and missile silos in the so-called air-breathing element of the Strategic Air Command. It was the property of the air-jockeys in the long-range bombers. Today, it's not the brilliant, but intentionally deviant Dr. Strangelove that really catches the ethos of that SAC moment -- a certain cocksure insouciance to what bombing actually meant when your planes were nuclear armed. For that, check out the 1963 movie A Gathering of Eagles, starring Rock Hudson and Rod Taylor. Watch for the scene in which Taylor resolutely reacts to the news of a no-notice, make-or-break "Operational Readiness Inspection" -- the dreaded ORI. He rips off his tie, Clark Kent-style, exposing an impressive thatch of chest hair. It's a classic embodiment of testosterone-driven, hard-charging command, whose end point is redemption for him as well as the wing -- not the extinction of life on Earth as we know it.
Certainly though, Dr. Strangelove did a better job capturing the surreal world of nuclear theory outside Cheyenne Mountain, rather than the humdrum one inside the Complex. Serving in SAC in the early 1970s, for instance, my brother routinely appended to its official motto, "peace is our profession," the unofficial, but popular, "war is our hobby." That, after all, was more consistent with the mailed fist that dominated SAC's emblem. While it clearly existed to deter nuclear wars, SAC also stood ready to fight and "win" them. As late as 1999, one B-1 bomber pilot assured me, straight-faced, "Don't tell me we can't win a nuclear war -- that's what I train for." Buck Turgidson, eat your heart out.
My War Games
In 1986, the year President Ronald Reagan and Soviet Premier Mikhail Gorbachev teetered on the brink of eliminating superpower nuclear weapons at their summit meeting in Reykjavik, I participated in a computerized war game inside Cheyenne Mountain. It ended in a simulated nuclear attack against the United States.
By today's standards, our computers were primitive leviathans: IBM mainframes with old-fashioned tape drives -- roughly the size of jumbo, sub-zero refrigerators in today's McMansions; they had disc drives or "packs" roughly the size of dishwashers. Our computer screens were a monochromatic green. From a Hollywood special-effects perspective, they were poorly lit and relentlessly boring -- not at all like the glitzy nuclear war room in the 1983 film WarGames that starred a fresh-faced Matthew Broderick.
As those monochromatic missile tracks crossed the Arctic Circle and began to terminate at various U.S. cities, the mood among the battle staff grew reflective. Yes, it was only a game, but everyone present knew that nuclear Armageddon with the Soviet Union was possible, and that it would kill tens, perhaps even hundreds of millions of people in both countries. That day, in that command center, we were virtual witnesses to our worst nightmare: a nuclear holocaust that might not only destroy our country and the Soviet Union, but perhaps civilization as we knew it.
How We Never Left Cheyenne Mountain
When the Soviet Union began to disintegrate in 1989, few people were more surprised than our intelligence agencies and our military (myself included). After putting decades of thought and planning into mutually assured destruction, after planning not just to fight but to win nuclear wars, we now faced a brighter, potentially less nuclear, or even non-nuclear future. And all this had come about -- under the shadow of true global terror -- without a Department of Homeland Security, or an Orwellian "Patriot Act," or so many of the other accoutrements of our present homeland security moment. (Without, in fact, even the emotive, vaguely un-American word "homeland" being in use.)
Indeed, when it was over, we claimed victory on the very basis that our freedoms -- and our political system -- were stronger than our rival's. We had, those declaring victory claimed, trusted and empowered the people, not an ossified state bureaucracy.
The optimism of 1990 was strikingly mainstream. President George H.W. Bush spoke of "a new era, freer from the threat of [nuclear] terror, stronger in the pursuit of justice, and more secure in the quest for peace." We were supposedly lining up as a society to cash-in our "peace dividend" chips -- with our winnings designated for pressing domestic concerns. Like presidential candidate Warren G. Harding, who campaigned for a return to "normalcy" after World War I, Jeane Kirkpatrick, Reagan's tough-talking ambassador to the United Nations, wrote that, after so many decades of vigilance and sacrifice, we could once again become "a normal country in a normal time."
But it never happened. Instead of normalcy, we remained hunkered down in Cheyenne Mountain. We continued to look fearfully out at the world, while arming ourselves to the teeth. We became wedded to the idea of bunkers and barriers, whether fortified fences along the Mexican border, imperial military bases along the peripheries of a burgeoning empire, or, on a micro scale, security gates patrolled by small armies of private guards to keep the "have nots" out of "have" communities. (To these, the ultra-rich have now added "panic rooms" in their mansions -- tiny domestic Cheyenne Mountains secured by mini-steel blast doors, monitored by cameras, and stocked with provisions.) After the attacks of September 11, 2001, it was as if we had "buttoned up" and slammed shut the blast doors to Fortress America.
How did the planet's self-proclaimed "sole superpower" in its moment of triumph become such a fearful country? In our endless face-off with the Soviet Union, did we come to resemble it far more than we ever imagined? After all, instead of the USSR, it's now we who are fighting a difficult war in Afghanistan; it's now we who are deflating our currency with massive deficits for weapons of marginal utility; it's now we who put forward unilateral proposals for earth-penetrating, bunker-busting nukes; it's now we who are often seen as aggressors on the world stage.
As we approach the 50th anniversary of the North American Aerospace Defense Command (NORAD) this May ("Guarding What You Value Most" is the motto at its web site), isn't it high time that we closed those 25-ton blast doors one last time and, without glancing back, walked toward those starry skies and the twinkling lights of that city in the distance? Isn't it high time that we fulfilled the Reykjavik dream?
As Americans, shouldn't we again learn to start worrying and loathe the bomb -- so much so that we roll up our collective sleeves and work to eliminate it from our planet? It's never too late to cash-in whatever peace-dividend chips still remain. And as we walk away with the last of our Cold War winnings -- no matter how meager -- let's leave behind as well the bunker and barrier mentality that went with them.
William J. Astore, a retired lieutenant colonel (USAF), has taught at the Air Force Academy and the Naval Postgraduate School. He now teaches at the Pennsylvania College of Technology. He is the author of Hindenburg: Icon of German Militarism (Potomac Press, 2005) among other works. He may be reached at wastore@pct.edu.
Copyright 2008 William Astore
Delicious
Digg
StumbleUpon
Newsvine
Facebook
Google
Yahoo
Technorati
15 Comments so far
Show AllWhy shut the doors - it is that stary night that we should all be concerned about. It seems to me that the facility should be used to preserve life after the planet Nibiru arives. Again - I believe that your story is just a slight cover of what is really happening inside that mountain. Those huge doors and the water reserves would sustain chosen people for a substantial amount of time. Why not tell the truth. Those of us who cannot and will not be able to find a place to escape the devastation that will envelope the earth find peace of mind knowing that our race will survive in places such as the Mountain of Colorado. I believe man kind will survive better than all the scriptures have predicted. We have been warned and the message has been read loud and clear.
hybridoma2001- "I believe it has nothing to do with communism but everything to do with having as much control as possible over energy sources."
You're not putting the pieces together. Yes, one goal is to control the oil. But the question is 'why'? If you said greed, you are incorrect. The goal is to control the oil spigget that supplies China... so that communism is dependent on capitalism for it's energy. Afghanistan was a strategic move to place ourselves between Iran and China, and to block the pipeline that was planned to directly connect the two countries. We couldn't let that happen without us having control over that resource.
But what I'm saying is that there are more factors at play then just oil. How do you explain the current push for missile defense? Historically missile defense violates the terms of all ballistic missile treaties... it was agreed that no country would build a system to protect against missiles because under the MADD doctrine, to design defensive measures is actually interpreted as an offensive move. That's why Putin is making such a stink about the whole thing. And why put it in Poland and Czech? Obviously they are not aimed at the 0 missiles that Iran has. They are placed squarely between Western Europe and Russia.
And how do you explain Bush's attempt at extending NATO right onto Russia's border- via the former soviet states? Obviously, you have to admit someone still hates communists.
How do you explain Russia and China conducting the largest and totally unprecedented joint military exercises last year? They have never done that before... they are infact adversaries. Yet, they see a common threat from US. So they are flexing their muscle, together.
Why do you think we invaded Afghanistan first, when the hijackers where all from Saudi Arabia? Oil, yes we covered that. But secondly, Afghanistan borders both Russia and China. It is supremely strategically located for putting the squeeze on both Russia and China simultaneously. And military doctrine allows for parking some missile defense there as well... perfectly positioned to the south of all communists of concern.
Why do you think the Chinese shot down a satellite a few months ago? Let me guess.. you're gonna say it's all because of the oil in space.
Why does Putin says he's developed ballistic missiles that can evade missile defense? Don't tell me...you're probably going to guess oil.
Look, just remember that Cold and Hot wars between super powers are fought by proxy, not directly (hopefully!). Korea, Vietnam, Cambodia, Cuba, ect.ect. Each will be given a rational... but the rational will never reveal the big picture motives. Much easier for them to label the whole thing ambiguously as a 'War on Terror'... with no national borders thereby allowing them to morph the war into any strategic geographical location they wish to pursue next.
In the feeble minds of the neocons they still see the world in terms of capitalism and communism. That is their end game. It is much more complicated then just 'oil'.
We can hate nuclear weapons and criticise the military until we are blue in the face, but if we don't have them, we are vulnerable. If we disarm our nuclear option, do you really think China or Russia will do the same? The Cold War remained cold (though it did approach room temperature a couple of times...) for so long because of mutually assured destruction. On the flip-side... do you think the US would have attacked Iraq if Saddam had nukes?
You can condemn the genie, but you can't put him back in the bottle...
http://rebelconservative.blogspot.com
What I found interesting is that the article pointed the the 'near' total ban on the bomb that the USA and Russia nearly agreed to under Reagan.
It's Reagan that helped cement my hatred of nuclear weapons and pray for a world-wide ban of this device that is absent of any good.
MAD is an insane policy that could only work with two rational people approaching an unreasable situation. How confident are you all that the people with the bomb are rational...will be. Let's see...USA,Europe,Russia,China,India,Pakistan,Turkey and now maybe Iran.
Until the military-Industrial coplex is dealt with nothing will change. Too many people (including our lawmakers) are making too much money to stop it. Un regulated capitalism is just as dangerous to human society as communism ever was.
fakedemocracy, as much as I understand your point of view regarding the recent acts of unilateral aggression by the USA, I must say that I believe it is nothing more than an attempt to control the world's last major sources of oil.
Just look at who we placed in power in Afganistan - a former member of a major petroleum compamy. Our Secretary of State has the same connections with major oil firms. The Vice-President and President are also closely connected with the major oil companies.
I believe it has nothing to do with communism but everything to do with having as much control as possible over energy sources.
The Russians understand US imperialism and are preparing for a worse case scenario. Irving Berlin's WW1 song, 'Over There' will have to be updated to 'Over Here.' There is no such thing as a war on terror. Just the war on anybody who disagrees with the Bush/Cheney/Republican/Zionist/ Christian funDUMBentalist/ feudalistic overlords running the nation.
To hijack my own comment, I'd like to say that we need to start looking at the current war for what it really appears to be. Who do the neocons hate most? If you said communists, you win a prize.
Consider this. 1989 Cold War comes to an end. In the republicans view- Clinton failed to capitalize on this moment of Communist weakness. Hence, dubious election results in 2000 bring the neocons into total power. Following a sketchy 'catalizing' event in 2001, the neocons seize the opportunity to invade where? Afghanistan- directly on the border of both Russia AND China. I bet they would love to park some missile defense trucks in those Afghani mountains right in the commies backyard. Seems like a Cuban missile crisis scenario... only this time a crisis for the Russians. Actually, military doctrine confirms this and states that missile defense is part of coalition troop protection in any theater of war.
Next stop Iraq- deny Russia and China access to Iraqi oil. Ever wonder why the neocons unashamedly say "100 years of occupation"? Obviously it's not because they think they need 100 years to defeat the insurgents. Ask a neocon off camera who the real boogieman is and they might just tell you- in their mind it's communists.
Next, neocon thinking says, 'let's re-invest in the Cold War economy that propped up American capitalism so well last time... we're going to buy some missile defense'. And we're putting it in Czech, Poland and England to guard against, excuse me, 0 missiles from Iran? Surely you jest neocons. This missile defense is squarely aimed at the 6000 missiles from Russia. No one else.
Next, the neocons try to get Georgia and Latvia joined up with NATO. That was two weeks ago. Fortunately the neocons didn't fool anyone with that one. How insane is that? Surround Russia with NATO in the former Soviet satellite states? They must be MADD.
I think it's clear, when you look at a map, and the timeline of events (go back the full 60 years if you want), and the facts, not to mention the phony WMD scare tactics that fell flat on their face.... this War on Terror has little to do with Islam, and a lot to do with same old same old anti-communist mentality. We are in the midst of Cold War II, The Sequel. These neocons offer nothing except placing mankind on the edge of oblivion once again. I hope their apocalyptic legacy is duly noted in whatever history books may survive.
And these guys are in charge of the nuclear devices:
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=1070329053600562261
good luck with the doors and all....
Thanks for the great article. Walking away from nukes would actually put us back on par with the 'Age of Enlightenment'. Unfortunately though... that solution doesn't offer a corresponding 'money making' solution... which is the only solution capitalism believes in. If only they could look ahead and realize that abandoning nukes altogether DOES make money because it ensures the worlds survival better then any missile defense can.
I knew nuclear weaponry, and its accompanying mentality, was an extreme corruption by the time I was 20.
Huh, I knew that by the time I was six, after one of those useless classroom bomb drills in October, 1962. The teacher also handed out yellow booklets with the CD-triangle logo on them. She said that they were strictly for our parents eyes only. So of course I read them and learned a lot of new words. They described the kind of destruction to expect at various radii from a 5 MT bomb. Then described various types of shelters suburbanites could build, the most basic one was to a lean doors against the side of you house and shovel dirt over the doors - sure, that will protect you and your family.
We KNOW all of this already. Another fireside memoir from a soldier who took a lifetime to undo some of his indoctrination.
Another retired military brass regretting an integral aspect of the organization he served. Why didn't he come out against it all earlier? Money over morality? Why does it take some people a lifetime to figure this shit out? I knew nuclear weaponry, and its accompanying mentality, was an extreme corruption by the time I was 20.
Wait a minute - we have the 'War on terrorism'!
But we forgot to define the terrorists.
Without the Soviets, there will be no one to blame but ourselves.
Amen.
Time to walk away from our destructive toys. All of them.
Childhood is over.