EMAIL SIGN UP!
Most Popular This Week
- Picture of the Week
- 'The Gilded Age' Statistics Corporations Don't Want Workers, or Anyone, to See
- As Death Toll Rises Beyond 500, Garment Factory Disaster 'Worst in World History'
- Report: Toxic Chemicals Found in Thousands of Children's Products
- Bradley Manning is Off Limits at SF Gay Pride Parade, but Corporate Sleaze is Embraced
- Report: Toxic Chemicals Found in Thousands of Children's Products
- The Life and Death of Words, People, and Even Nature
- Move Over, Koch Brothers: A Bigger, Darker Rightwing Funder Is Out to Destroy Public Education
- You and Your Family Are Guinea Pigs for the Chemical Corporations
- After Boston, Eyes-Wide Open Hope?
Popular content
Today's Top News
One Hand Clapping in the Coal Fields
We present our creation myths to ourselves as though they describe a one time event. But what we are really saying, when we say God, or Raven, or Spider, or Whatever created the Universe, rested, and looked upon the creation well-satisfied, was that he, she or it was pleased with re-creation. Out of nothing was born a closed loop process, one that changed, evolved, giving and taking, requiring dying for living, constantly trading a finite supply of carbon, oxygen, nitrogen, and hydrogen from one recognizable living plant or animal form to another. Set in motion was a system of shape-shifting, turn taking, a slight of hand magic by which the white rabbit pulled out of the infinite darkness of the black hat becomes a red rose, then a woman, an ostrich, a swarm of bees, becomes a giant redwood, then a swaying mass of kelp in the Sargasso Sea, an Adelie Penguin, a coatimundi, a carrot. The hand opens and closes, each manifestation a new word written on the palm. Each incarnation requires the other to exist, then not to exist. The hand opens and says barred owl. We hear a hoot and the squeak of a meadow vole. It closes, opens, and says goose necked barnacle. We feel the cold surge of the tide, the wash of nutrients, the clamor of waves.This hand, opening and closing, resounds as one hand clapping in the Universe.
Imagine a trout. Imagine its gills sucking dissolved oxygen out of water, its air bladder regulating its depth, its ventral, dorsal and caudal fins propelling and directing, its sensitive lateral line tuned like an antenna to all aqueous frequencies, its scales slipping it through the water without friction, its accordion mouth, its eye, the marvelous colors of its camouflage. Then imagine it dissatisfied with its condition. The trout has developed a competitive and self-aggrandizing consciousness. Imagine that it desires profit from its environment, has worked out a fishy scheme to exploit profit from water by selling it. As the remaining water darkened, thickened, and shallowed, what would you say to that trout? What advice?
Imagine a bird, perhaps a bluebird, whose economic advisors extolled the marketing of air. The advisors proclaimed that the happiest bluebird would be the one who amassed the greatest fortune from the most efficient diminishment of the atmosphere.
Or, imagine a worm whose perceived welfare depended on the selling of topsoil, replacing humus and minerals with chemicals and pesticides.
To imagine such a trout or bluebird or worm is to envision a political or philosophical cartoon. We know such mercenary animals are impossible. They could not and would not indulge in these behaviors, not because they are dumb, less evolved than humans, but because they are inherently, genetically, wise. Their wisdom is comprised of living in harmony with their environment, being in harmony with reality. I would be hard pressed to think of another definition of wisdom other than living in harmony with the reality of nature. We have to base wisdom in the morality and value derived from living in harmony with our ultimate reality. Imagine an oak that attempts to derive its value from selling and consuming its own roots. If the point of a cartoon is to teach, then these animal and plant cartoons teach us that there is only one un-wise, one dumb species on earth.
Last week I traveled to the coal fields of eastern Kentucky. The first warm days of spring were an exultation of blooming -- daffodils, magnolias, cherries, redbud. After visiting the Pine Mountain Settlement School in Harlan County which teaches environmental studies to children and adults from all over the state, we drove up onto a "reclaimed" Mountaintop Removal ( MTR ) site.
I have written quite a lot about the environmental and cultural ravages of MTR. It was based on reading, interviews, videos and photos, and first hand panoramic observance. Last fall, from up on Larry Gibson's Kayford Mountain in West Virginia, I had seen the draglines working, the coal trucks hauling, the valleys being filled, the mountains sliced in cross section exposing 18 inch seams of coal.
But I had never actually walked on a site, particularly a reclaimed site, when all the explosives and machinery are gone, the valley fills are graded, the grass growing on the compacted rubble, the wind blowing, the sun shining, the access roads muddy from heavy spring rains, blue sky and billowy clouds reflected in puddles, the only sounds wind in the grass and blue jays calling from the next mountain (the one with trees), when the crude surgery is over, and the traumatized patients have been left alone to "recover" in peace and isolation.
I was unprepared for how strongly I would react to being in the presence of these violently abused mountains. Instead of standing on the ridge of a healthy mountain observing distant devastation, it was reversed. I was walking on remnant, sham mountains who are being presented as proof that no harm has been done. These vast, stunted, grassy nubs have been released back into the company of their brother and sister mountains. Their bulldozed slopes sag and crack as though they have lost all muscle tone, as though they have been de-boned. They are flaccid, pacific the way a lobotomized person is pacific -- eerily so, because they no longer have any conscious identity or will. They are neutered, gutted. Water runs right through them, polluting and flooding the towns downstream. Never again will they support the most diverse habitat in North America. No white oaks, no tulip poplars, no bears, no white pines, no golden seal, no woodpeckers, no ginseng. Thousands of plant and animal species gone. Sterile. Heart and brain removed. Evolutionary history removed. Role in future evolutionary history removed. These Appalachian Mountains, oldest in the world, are being rendered gravel cadavers growing green hair from their dead bodies. They are like lumpy, castrated, drugged semi-beings propped up in church to reassure their relatives and friends that everything is OK. They have the same credibility as mountains as a dishonestly elected man in a suit has as president when he lies to the people about the necessity for war. Just as he betrays democracy, these husks of mountains have been tortured to betray nature.
King Coal tells us that these wastelands are more useful than the original mountains. Prisons can be built here! Malls! Golf courses! Yes, and roses and doves can be tattooed on a dead body.
Here's an exercise: All you need are a water soluble pen and a damp sponge.
Take the pen and write the name of a favorite animal or plant on the other palm. Close and open your hand. Think of your hand as the power of evolution and the secret of creation.
Sponge off the word and write another. Each time you do it, imagine the life cycle of that animal or plant. Keep going till your imagination fails you. Do this alone or with a friend. Write on each other's palm until tired. Remember, though, that the Earth would not run out of imagination.
Years ago, when I first heard the mysterious Zen koan that asks one to describe the sound of one hand clapping, I had no idea what it might mean, or what idea the question itself might be trying to teach. I think I do now. In every cell of every living species of every healthy ecosystem, Nature's hand is playing this little game. It loves the sound of its own hand clapping. Opening and closing. It opens and the sound of one hand clapping is the squawk of a raven. It opens and the sound is a Bottle-nosed dolphin clicking. Aspen leaves quaking. A fox barking. Girls singing at jump rope. An acorn dropping. A cricket chirping.
Mountaintop Removal cuts off the hand. To make this claim is not anti business, nor is it sentimental. It's simply reality. Nature's reality.
We live in that hand. We live at the mercy of its ability to clap.
Robert Shetterly is an artist living in Maine. His nationally traveling portrait series can be viewed at www.americanswhotellthetruth.org. He can be reached at rshetterly@prexar.com.
Comments
Note: Disqus 2012 is best viewed on an up to date browser. Click here for information. Instructions for how to sign up to comment can be viewed here. Our Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines. Note to Readers: Spam Filter May Capture Legitimate Comments...

27 Comments so far
Show AllI watched a train go by here in Ohio that was loaded with coal, the source of most electricity for this state. I lost count of the number of individual cars. It was like an endless river of coal...
When are we going to drop the old paradigm?
Cheap is sometimes stupid. Such is the case with coal and it ends badly sooner or later. Let it be sooner!
There is a reason it takes millions of years for coal to form geologically. Coal is precious. It is concentrated carbon-based life. We have been burning way too much of that life for way too long. It is most disrespectful. It is almost as if we are trying to create hell on earth.
In my opinion, if we don't learn soon how to fit in and live with reverence for life, other forces of life will simply rid the planet of a species that has become a threat and is no longer life-affirming. I think this is already happening and the clock is ticking louder and louder as each day goes by.
I hope we can learn because the solutions are out there. The collective will is what is lacking.
Peace,
Ken
Isn't a sign of wisdom knowing when to put away the toys of youth?
Like the author, I have also seen MTR up close. My mother's side all still live in the mountains of West Virginia. She grew up in a valley and during blasts, the kids would all run and hide under the tables because parts of the ceiling or wall hangings would fall down. My grandpap was a coal miner and died in his early seventies from complications of Black Lung. Coal mining paid for their food and their clothes, but in the end, they've paid with their drinking water and their health.
Most of our power plants here in Wisconsin are coal fired. My household has cut our electricity use in all the usual green ways and buys the renewable energy credits. I want to reduce demand on these types of plants (because they just aren't going away any time soon)so that fewer people have to deal with the after effects of our laziness.
Is the hand opening on humanity or closing? We have been around in our present form for only a blink of an evolutionary eye and yet creation can only tolerate so much burning until it has to close it's hand to put out the fire.
This article and the comments seem as though the authors haven't heard the Republicans say we have enough coal reserves in America to keep going as we have been for "hundreds of years" into the future. (Or maybe they did hear, but choose to inquire into the matter on other grounds.)
One of the biggest market fallacies is that the market will automatically determine the appropriate price of a good or service. A major flaw is that markets rarely account for the full cost of a good, especially the "social" costs; the pollution, the sick, maimed and killed mineworkers, the practically instantaneous destruction of mountains older than we can truly comprehend. How to tabulate these costs? And if we could, what would the true cost of a kilowatt hour from coal be?
The very rich corporate owners of coal mines create their own personal environments out of money. They do not think they need natural environments to live in.
Humanity is the only animal that willfully and intentionally destroys it's habitat.... and we think we're evolved. stupid.
To Robert Shetterly: What an astounding and beautiful opening paragraph you have crafted in this article. I am richer for reading it, and i thank you.
(the rest of the article is not lost on me, and i thank you for it all)
peace
rick
We DO have enough coal to go on doing just as we have for hundreds of years. about 200 years worth, or if you tear up alot of towns and highways, about 2000 years worth. The repubs are telling the truth on this one...
King Coal tells us that these wastelands are more useful than the original mountains. Prisons can be built here! Malls! Golf courses!
Progressive policy would require coal profiteers to live on their reclaimed land.
Wikipedia: "Coal and coal waste products including fly ash, bottom ash, and boiler slag, contain many heavy metals, including arsenic, lead, mercury, nickel, sulphur, vanadium, beryllium, cadmium, barium, chromium, copper, molybdenum, zinc, selenium and radium, which are dangerous if released into the environment. Coal also contains low levels of uranium, thorium, and other naturally-occurring radioactive isotopes whose release into the environment may lead to radioactive contamination. While these substances are trace impurities, enough coal is burned that significant amounts of these substances are released, resulting in more radioactive waste than nuclear power plants. Mercury emissions from coal burning are concentrated as they work their way up the food chain and converted into methylmercury, a toxic compound that may affect people who frequently consume freshwater fish affected by mercury pollution from nearby coal-fired power plants."
It took 100 million years to store the carbon that we are digging up and burning in 100 years. Fossil fuels should be saved for later, if we need them. We should use as many renewable energy sources as we can, because they are clean and renewable. That means they are sustainable. As long as the sun shines and the wind blows, we will have energy.
Powerful article. MTR will continue as long as the companies can get away with it. The law is meant to protect the environment from wanton destruction for greed. We've had instead in the past years an abandonment of the cherished principles of responsible government. The idea that capitalism should be restrained is anathema to growth, so we are told by the free market mavens populating our mediaspace and swaying politicians through endless lobbying.
Of course the profitability increasingly flows to the already rich, who buy out, plunder, and abuse anyone too weak to oppose their uncontrolled greed. This is rule of the strong, not by the law, but by the power of money and absolute power heralding a new gilded era in this country. We of course will not share equally in the bounty, but only be left with the destruction that Rob Shetterly describes.
I've said it here and I'll say it again: they will get away with everything they can. The progressive community needs to stand together in opposing MTR, enforce an embargo, and demand a move away from coal, or at least the mining of it via the total destruction of MTR.
I was raised in WVa.The strip mining done in eastern Ohio and elsewhere was devastating enough-but minor in comparison to the demolition of mountains going on now.
I believe it was the August issue of Nature magazine that had aerial photos of one such explosion.Thay were truly gut-
wrenching.
Now with Sen.Byrd retiring any attempts to slow down this horrendous practice will probably be greatly diminished.
Market possesses a powerful survival instinct the same as Raven and Spider. Market will use up all the available energy in coal deposits, tar sands, and natural gas before expiring. This is the continuation of the creation myth.
This may be the stupidest metaphor in the history of stupidity. I love having a source for alternative and progressive views on the environment, but I can do without the new age mysticism. What would fix this article is some actual digging by the writer for information like mercury and sulphur levels in the surrounding waters or information about how the government of Kentucky has long been indifferent toward ruining of the environment they continually say is the most beautiful in the nation.
The Ohio Valley Environmental Coalition website has an excellent photo gallery showing the ravages of MTR including Kayford Mountain:
http://www.ohvec.org/galleries/mountaintop_removal/
despone: This beautiful elegy is based on observation and appreciation of nature, biology and evolution - how it shapes itself into so many improbable and priceless forms. The more you pay attention to the natural world, the more awestruck you can become at its complicated and miraculous nature, the more despondent at its destruction. Here there is a confluence of scientific reality and spirituality.
I believe the author is also mourning the governmental indifference you mention (which I, not being a poet, call complicity with the coal operators) and the crude attempts to cover over the destruction. We so live in a world where empty appearance and public relations replaces authenticity.
But nature is real, and it will let us know we have thrown away or misused its wonderful gifts that took so long to develop, molecule by molecule. When we destroy and pollute, nature will bring harm to our life and health, not through some mysticical means, but because the interconnectedness of life has actually been broken. Look at the disappearances of fish in the ocean.
50% of the nation's electricity comes from coal. Until you can show that you will be able to provide all the electrical conveniences that people have now with renewable energy, all the poetry in the world will not change things.
People like modern living, it is convenient. You can write about wisdom, but when you can flip a switch and have light, that is magic.
We have lost so many manufacturing jobs that the coal that was once used for steel and other industrial activity has been reduced. But if you tied to read poetry about that land 100 years ago, people would have thought you were nuts. They have jobs and electric lights. What more could you ask for than not to starve and freeze in the dark.
These are the realities. I believe that we should live in harmony with nature but get real. Until the basic needs are satisfied you are just reading poetry. Even after the basic needs people will want more. Maybe you need to create a spiritual transformation in the populace because waxing poetic will not get you there....sorry.
First of all, to twistoflex--I have heard several whispers, including one second-hand from a coal lobbyist, that coal reserves are exaggerated just as oil reserves have been--that we may have as little as 20 years. If we increase the use of coal, turning it into liquid fuel for vehicles for example, then we have even less. So I believe your estimations are way off.
Secondly klever says the retirement of Senator Byrd (which I have not heard mentioned) would be bad for hopes of ending MTR. I wonder where s/he gets that idea--in fact Byrd is just as much of a coal whore as all other politicians from here, although a stalwart defender of the Constitution and critic of the rogue Bush administration.
Finally sj1 points out that 50% of the electricity we currently use comes from coal, which has led to many modern conveniences, and says we must not criticize its destructiveness unless we can replace that. I have a quibble--if this is the ethic, if our conveniences and indulgences can't be compromised no matter what the environmental cost, then at least the costs of the indulgences relating to raising children should be exempted. Because if we continue ravaging the mountains, oceans and atmosphere at the present rate, a generation from now most of them likely won't even have survived, let alone be in a position to demand an ever-increasing load of consumer goods and power use. So if there can be no compromise of The American Way of Life, then there must be no more humans born.
As more than just a fan of solar, wind, geothermal etc....(and let's not forget hydrogen as fuel...I'm big on that) I think we're approaching coal wrong.
There have been solid-oxide fuel cells used with coal and it doubles the efficiency for electrical generation and also permits the ability to remove contaminants and pollutants. For example...if we converted our coal fired plants to solid oxide fuel cells the same electricity would be provided with half the amount of coal.
Of course besides this our nation should go to hot-rock geothermal like we went after sending a man to the moon (ok ok...its far easier and cheaper to build geothermal plants but bear with me) and then the attractiveness of status quo goes bye bye.
We need to push coal into these alternatives while working like a maniac generating electricity from the clean sources.
Speaking about being addicted to power - albeit something much more friendly that Wisconsin relying on coal:
$2-B power sale a shot in arm
Wisconsin deal keeps lid on rates here, triggers dams
by Mary Agnes Welch, WPG Free Press, p. A3
Wisconsin wants to buy 500 megawatts of Manitoba Hydro's electricity -- a $2-billion deal announced Thursday that green-lights the construction of two new northern dams and helps keep Manitoba's power rates the lowest in the land.
"This is a major deal," said Manitoba Hydro President and CEO Bob Brennan. "It allows us to build major plants and have other people help pay for them at the front end."
The deal is with Wisconsin Public Service, which powers the northeastern corner of the state. It won't kick in for another decade -- which gives Hydro time to build the first of two new dams -- but it will last for 15 years and funnel $2 billion into Hydro's coffers.
That, along with other export deals, helps keep domestic power rates low, said Brennan and Premier Gary Doer Thursday.
The sale also requires the construction of a small, 60-km transmission line from Winnipeg to the Minnesota border -- a project that could engender some local opposition like the kind that killed similar power lines in Alberta and British Columbia.
And the deal makes the need for BiPole III all the more pressing. That's the huge new transmission line slated to run down the west side of Lake Manitoba that has sparked controversy for the last year.
The Wisconsin deal is the latest in a trickle of fairly sizeable power sales to American states looking to ween themselves from dirty coal power. Earlier this year, Hydro signed a similar deal with Minnesota Power to sell 250 megawatts starting in 2020.
The revenue from the Wisconsin sale alone will cover almost half the cost of Conawapa -- the granddaddy of the next generation of hydro dams planned for northern Manitoba. And it mandates the construction of Keeyask, a smaller dam that can be in service earlier, in time to start selling power to Wisconsin.
The province has already started work on the Wuskwatim dam south of Thompson, which has been troubled by cost overruns, a labour shortage and difficulties finding a willing builder.
"Right now is definitely a bad time to build anything," said Brennan. "We'll space it out in such a way to take advantage of the construction cycle."
Brennan said the dams last 100 years and continue to pump out power while inflation rises, meaning it makes sense over the long run to build the dams now despite skyrocketting construction costs.
The Wisconsin deal is also further proof that the province is making more inroads into American markets than it is in Ontario, once touted as the prime customer for Manitoba's hydro power, where a 3,000-megawatt sale could set Hydro up for years.
Both Doer and Brennan said they're still going to talk to Ontario, and they said Manitoba still has plenty of export capacity left on Conawapa. But Brennan hinted that the province could sell Ontario smaller bursts of power on the spot market.
Tory Leader Hugh McFadyen said the deal is a good one for the province, but it spotlights the folly of building BiPole III down the west side of the province when Minnesota and Wisconsin are to the east, much closer to Manitoba's northeastern generating stations.
"It highlights once and for all the daffiness of this decision," said McFadyen.
The NDP has mandated that the new transmission line be built down the west of Lake Manitoba, not the east side of Lake Winnipeg where pristine boreal forest and unpredictable First Nations exist.
The Tories say that decision wastes millions in construction costs and lost power that will leach off the much longer line.
maryagnes.welch@freepress.mb.ca
Doer multiplies the stakes in Hydro battle with Tories
by Dan Lett, WPG Free Press, p. A4
If this were a poker game, then yesterday's announcement of a $2-billion power sale would represent an "all-in" bet by Premier Gary Doer and his pro-hydroelectricity government.
At the very least, we can conclude the stakes in the battle over Manitoba Hydro have gone up significantly.
The gaudy revenues that will flow from the sale to Wisconsin more than justify the addition of Wuskwatim and Conawapa generating stations, and lend an even greater sense of urgency to the completion of Bipole III, a third major transmission line connecting the south with northern generating stations.
For the Doer government, timing couldn't have been better. Given the uncertainty Hydro is facing with respect to all three of those mega projects, the Wisconsin deal could be a tonic.
Controversy continues to surround the province's decision to build BiPole III down the west side of the province, instead of the shorter and cheaper east-side route, to protect the boreal forest east of Lake Winnipeg. As for Conawapa, Hydro was committed to the project but it appeared at one time to be wholly reliant on a power sale to Ontario. The Wisconsin deal makes Conawapa a virtual slam dunk. There is also concern about the immediate future of the Wuskwatim generating station. The cost is skyrocketing and construction has been delayed because Hydro cannot find a contractor to take on the project in the overheated construction industry.
For the NDP government, the power sale is the equivalent of putting money where the premier's mouth is. Since he was elected in 1999, Doer has boldly stuck to a policy of aggressive expansion of Hydro's generating capacity and energy exports.
However, along with galvanizing Hydro's expansion plans, the Wisconsin deal has put a hard deadline on completing projects that up to now have existed only on the drawing board. One of the new generating stations and a new transmission line from the North must be in place by 2017 to satisfy Wisconsin's terms. And deadlines can be mixed blessings.
Hydro will need regulatory approval for the new transmission line and Conawapa. Approval for Wuskatim took four years. Doer admitted that there is some risk to these projects if he can't find a way to streamline the approval process.
There are also political hurdles. Deals must be completed with First Nation and non-First Nation communities for BiPole III. It is important to note here that even though the province has rejected the east-side route, Hydro has yet to identify exactly where on the west side it wants to run its line. It is reasonable to conclude that once that route is identified, new problems and opponents will arise.
Given all these potential hurdles, opponents and critics including Tory Leader Hugh McFadyen may see the deadline as an opportunity to throw a wrench into Doer's grand Hydro vision. McFadyen has not relented on his campaign to stir public opposition to the more expensive west-side route. He may be emboldened now to turn up the heat on the government with the realization Hydro now has a finite amount of time to finish the project.
However, reinforcing the idea that deadlines are mixed blessings, McFadyen's efforts will now be judged against the very real numbers associated with the Wisconsin sale.
In addition to the $2 billion in revenues for Hydro, this sale confirms the need for 10 to 15 years of intensive construction in Manitoba and all the economic spinoffs that will accrue. Public works have been a significant contributor to economic growth in this province, which continues to run above the national average. Public investment in construction has made Manitoba a more diversified economy, which helps insulate us from advancing recessionary forces.
Although it is not a precise science, the province estimates the deal could create more than 2,000 long-term jobs and billions of dollars in economic activity over the life of the construction of the hard assets needed to complete the sale.
Anyone seeking to obstruct the construction of generating stations or transmission lines will now have to explain how they are going to replace the lost economic benefits if the Wisconsin sale, and future sales made possible by the expansion, are delayed or scuttled.
dan.lett@freepress.mb.ca
JCLIENTELLE: Thank you for trying to educate DESPONE.
DESPONE & SJC: Nature is WRIT in poetry, and Robert Shetterly's beautiful writing does it justice. Sure, people like their conveniences, but there should be a thrust towards teaching conservation. Americans are a fat, wasteful, and ungracious people increasingly... as if it's all due them, and by it's, I mean what belongs to all, the web of life via its myriad ecosystems is just that, a WEB. Too many strands cut by greed, indifference, and the lazy need for "convenience," and the whole thing implodes.
DESPONE: I hope you grow a soul. Pragmatism will only get you so far in a human body.
"Americans are a fat, wasteful, and ungracious people increasingly… "
Let us hope you grow one too.
from your event i learned more things especially about creativity. i had good learning from your article. thank you.
===========
Brook
manitoba drug rehab