Scientists: Warmer Seas, Over-Fishing Spell Disaster for Oceans
HANOI - The future food security of millions of people is at risk because over-fishing, climate change and pollution are inflicting massive damage on the world's oceans, marine scientists warned this week.
The two-thirds of the planet covered by seas provide one fifth of the world's protein -- but 75 percent of fish stocks are now fully exploited or depleted, a Hanoi conference that ended Friday was told.
Warming seas are bleaching corals, feeding algal blooms and changing ocean currents that impact the weather, and rising sea levels could in future threaten coastal areas from Bangladesh to New York, experts said.
"People think the ocean is a place apart," said Peter Neill, head of the World Ocean Observatory. "In fact it's the thing that connects us -- through trade, transportation, natural systems, weather patterns and everything we depend on for survival."
Marine ecosystems and food security were key concerns at the Global Conference on Oceans, Coasts, and Islands, an international meeting of hundreds of experts from governments, environmental groups and universities.
"There is a race to fish, but in wild capture fisheries right now we can catch no more," said Steven Murawski, fisheries chief science advisor at the US National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA).
"We catch 100 million metric tonnes per year, and that's been very flat globally. Our only hope is if we conserve and rebuild stocks," he said, adding that sustainable aquaculture could help make up the shortfall.
The current plunder is risking long-term sustainability with "too many fishing boats taking too many fish and not allowing the stocks to regenerate," said Frazer McGilvray of Conservation International.
"Once the oceans are gone, we're gone. The oceans sustain the planet."
The world has already seen the effects of over-fishing, experts said.
North Atlantic cod fisheries collapsed in the 1990s, anchovies previously disappeared off Chile, herring off Iceland and sardine off California.
Sixty-four percent of ocean areas fall outside national jurisdictions, making it difficult to reach international consensus or to stop illegal fishing -- a growing concern as high-tech ships scour the high seas.
"It's the Wild West. It's a very small number of boats but the technology allows them to take enormous amounts of fish," said Neill.
"They take only the high commercial product and they throw the bycatch overboard. The waste is extraordinary."
Marine life is also being harmed by climate change, said Murawski.
"We've seen that fish populations go up and down with variations in the climate," he said. "Increasingly we are starting to see long term change affect the productivity, the distributions, the migrations."
The trend is speeding up, Murawski said.
"Our forecasts are wrong," he said. "The melt-off is much faster than has been forecast in the models."
Meanwhile land-based pollution puts heavy strain on oceans, said Ellik Adler of the UN Environment Programme.
"Rivers of untreated sewage, factories, refineries, oil industry discharge their effluent into the marine environment, and this causes huge damage," he said. "Marine pollution has no political borders."
There are few easy fixes, experts said, but one initiative now being considered is setting up a global network of marine protected areas.
"You've got to get agreements between countries," said consultant Sue Wells, whose has worked in coastal East Africa. "Some developed countries have already closed some areas, and most coastal countries are now considering it."
Satellites could monitor no-catch areas, she said, while inspiration could come from South Pacific fishing communities.
"They have taboo areas, coral reef sanctuaries, where fish would be saved for bad weather periods or major festivals and feast," she said. "They know if they leave an area and don't fish there, they'll have much better stocks."
It is a view that has been lost in modern times, she said, where the common view now was "if I don't go and fish it, someone else will."
© 2008 Agence France Presse
Delicious
Digg
StumbleUpon
Newsvine
Facebook
Google
Yahoo
Technorati
12 Comments so far
Show AllThey just announced the collapse of the US west coast salmon fishery...
I don't care anymore.
Nothing new here!
There are growing dead areas of the oceans where life has almost ceases to exist.
A vegan lifestyle is not going to be a choice in the future. You better eat you veggies because that's all there is going to be... Yes, I know, there's always farm raised fish, complete with high levels of mercury and other toxins.
Earthlings the movie: http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-1282796533661048967
WARNING: This movie will change the way you view the your role on this planet. Are you a speciesist? Watch this movie and find out.
Nothihng will be done except more of the same. We're killing our planet and ourselves. It's a matter of time. Within twenty years our civilization and probally most life on Earth will be gone. It's our fault and we deserve what we get. Unfortunately there may not be too many of us left to learn from our mistakes. Does that sound alarmist or just the hard truth? It doesn't matter. We're fucked!
GALEN
'there would be only the vaugest traces left to show we were ever here'
yes, that stupid seed bank in norway would be one of them. and absolutely no bloody use at all. i've just got that book 'a world without us'. looks very interesting...................
These reports keep being released. Nothing happens.
Boycott your local sushi bar. Better yet, picket it.
We are already seeing rising prices and civil unrest associated with Soylent Red and Soylent Yellow supply shortages.
Now signs of trouble in the basic commodity for the production of Soylent Green?
"How did we come to this?"
Humans, and their actions, are responsible for the greatest world wide extinction of multiple species in history since the end of the Permian era. Greater even than the disaster the wiped out the dinosaurs.
There was a documentary thought experiment that was on cable a little while ago. It was called 'Aftermath; The World Without Humans'. It was based on a book called 'The World Without Us' and examined what would happen if mankind were to suddenly disappear.
Within twenty days, our entire electrical and power system would fail utterly. Nuclear power plants would overheat and explode. And nature would be on it's way to reclaim the entire planet.
ALL of our works, from the humblest cottage, to our greatest metropolises would be wiped from the face of the earth within 250 years. There would be only the vaguest traces left to show we were ever here. Our only legacy would be plastics and nuclear waste.
It showed just how absolutely pathetically insignificant we really are in the face of nature.
"Once the oceans are gone, we're gone. The oceans sustain the planet."
Those are very scary words and true ones. I wonder why governments aren't joining in a united effort to save the oceans and save humanity.
S.E. Alaska's fishing industry is definitely showing the effects of over-fishing. Herring eggs are harvested to send to Japan as a delicacy. In some rivers a certain species of fish has dwindled almost to extinction.
A few miles over the border in British Columbia, Canada, however, the same species of fish is abundant. That shows the difference between a capitalist nation that abuses the Earth for financial exploitation and one that is careful about ecology and the environment.
News in Today's paper:
No Salmon Season on the West Coast !
The Fishery has collapsed.
Read all about it !
Stop eating fish. Leave it to the species who depend on it--as in the ones who actually reside in it. That would solve the problem.