Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
The Miracle in Madagascar — a Blueprint for Saving Species
A study aimed at preventing the continued destruction of wildlife in Madagascar is being heralded as a scientific triumph that could act as a blueprint to save many other species from mass extinction.
Scientists believe they now have a viable road map that could be used anywhere in the world to protect the many thousands of animals and plants living precariously in biodiversity "hotspots", which are increasingly threatened by human activities. The findings are being seen as vindication for a radical new approach to saving endangered species by treating wildlife as a complex web of interacting animals and plants, rather than the old idea of saving one species at a time.
Madagascar was chosen for the experiment because it has one of the richest varieties of wildlife in the world, with a high proportion of endemic species living nowhere else. It has also experienced massive destruction of its forests, with barely 10 per cent of its original habitat surviving.
Yet the international team of researchers who carried out the 10-year study found that it was possible to compile a workable conservation plan based on a detailed analysis of the whereabouts and habitats of 2,315 species of ants, butterflies, frogs, geckos, lemurs and plants.
They built up a vast library of information on the exact location of thousands of animals and plants across entire regions of Madagascar. They then designed computer software to work out the habitat range of each species and how to devise the optimum way of saving them.
It is the first time that scientists have compiled such a detailed database of wildlife from such a broad spectrum of species over such a wide area of land. They believe such data is vital in deciding on priorities that will save the greatest number of animals and plants in the shortest possible timeframe. "Our analysis raises the bar on what's possible in conservation planning, and helps decision-makers determine the most important places to protect," said Claire Kremen of the University of California Berkeley.
"Conservation planning has historically focused on protecting one species, or one group of species, at a time, but in our race to beat species extinction that one-species approach is not going to be quick enough," said Professor Kremen, a co-leader of the team, whose study is published in the journal Science.
"Never before have biologists and policy-makers had the tools that allow analysis of such a broad range of species, at such a fine scale, over such a large geographic area," she said.
Life on earth has experienced five mass extinctions during the past 3.5 billion years but the present, sixth wave is probably the fastest. It is estimated that about half of the world's plant species and three-quarters of vertebrate species are concentrated in biodiversity hotspots - such as Madagascar - which make up just 2.3 per cent of the earth's land surface.
Some 80 per cent of the 30,000 known species of animals in Madagascar are not found anywhere else: half of the world's chameleons and all species of lemurs are endemic to the island, which lies 200 miles off the south-east coast of Africa and was isolated from the rest of the world for 160 million years before being populated by humans about 2,500 years ago.
The research team of 22 scientists from six countries included specialists from the Natural History Museum in London, Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, and the University of York. Their work will form the basis of the Malagasy government's plans to triple the area of protected land from about 5 million acres to 15 million acres, or 10 per cent of the country's land surface.
Brian Fisher, an entomologist at the California Academy of Sciences, said that a key part of the study was to include insects as well as the more popular animals, such as lemurs and geckos.
"Insects represent the bulk of terrestrial animal diversity but are often overlooked in conservation assessments. This study is unique in including a wide breadth of animals and plants in its conservation analysis," Dr Fisher said.
"We are the first generation to understand the impending demise of natural habitats, and we are the last generation that will have the ability to do something meaningful about it," he said.
A land apart
Madagascar was one of the most isolated places on earth before it was first populated by humans about 2,500 years ago. Humans have destroyed about 90 per cent of the island's original forests and dozens of species are thought to have gone extinct in the process. Forty-five species of large animals, including 16 species of lemur, have disappeared in modern times and a further 200 species are known to be at risk. In 2003, the Malagasy government announced an ambitious plan to conserve what is left of its pristine forests by building up the existing network of protected areas so that they will eventually cover 10 per cent of the country's territory. Nearly 13,000 plants and vertebrate animals are found only on Madagascar.
© 2008 The Independent
Comments
Note: Disqus 2012 is best viewed on an up to date browser. Click here for information. Instructions for how to sign up to comment can be viewed here. Our Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines. Note to Readers: Spam Filter May Capture Legitimate Comments...



11 Comments so far
Show AllWhat happened in the control plots where they did nothing at all?
"Conservation planning has historically focused on protecting one species, or one group of species, at a time, but in our race to beat species extinction that one-species approach is not going to be quick enough,"
**Wow. You mean its more effective to save a bunch of species than one at a time?
Who would have thunk it?
Scientists and common sense...so slow to catch on.
Shaking head.
Geez, Mr. Obvious,
Don't you have any comment to make other than a veiled pooh-pooh of landmark scientific research? This is valuable and informative work that's been done here. In my opinion, on par with the research that showed moth evolution in response to atmospheric pollution in Great Britain. Forest research that showed a link between pine borer beetle lifecycles and forest health. Ocean chemistry and coral reef destruction. I respect your opinions, Mr. Obvious: don't sully that with a blithe quip more suited to dunderheads and Luddites.
It is precisely the control plots which allowed these researchers to make the statements, claims, and postulations that are exhibited in the article. Extrapolate on your own to figure out the answer to your question, or do some of your "research" to find the primary sources.
One does not do "nothing at all" in a control plot. The very same attention and study are implicit in control populations and plots. If you'd experienced such research protocols for yourself, you'd know.
thewonderingyou - Can you point me to the primary literature? I have seen a lot of over-analysis and claims made for fancy methods when simply removing offending human activities works just as well. This may be a case where this level of complexity is needed, but how is anyone to know from this article? My frustration is with this superficial level of reporting.
the article is published here...
http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/short/320/5873/222
gtuzzolo - Thanks, I did find it finally using google earlier today. I'll try to paraphrase. Twenty-two scientists spent 10 years counting animals and plants and then declared that their work was worthwhile. What do you expect them to say? "We worked for ten years and spent millions but we really just should have asked the locals where the animals were?" They collected lots of data, created a model, and then release it as a breakthrough. Well, it may be. But how do they (or we) know? Have they compared the results of conserving habitat using their model with more traditional approaches? Of course not. I believe that these researchers are honest and believe in what they are doing, but get real.
Extinction means safe forever.
Man will no longer be around to screw things up like hunting the wolves again because they have been taken off the list to be hunted again.
I VOTE
EXTINCTION MEANS SAFE FOREVER!
It is worth downloading and reading the 100 page Climate Code Red paper at http://www.carbonequity.info/download.php?id=6 .
It is great that the Malagasy government is looking to preserve and connect what remains of original forest in Madagascar, but if global warming shifts the Southern hemisphere temperature isobars south 500 miles over just a couple decades, these protected ecological "hot spots" may be lost anyway.
We need a massive global awakening to turn things around.
Roger Eaton is correct, of course. The basic results of the study were known to many who lived closely off the land centuries ago, but those people were marginalized by industrialization (including industrial agriculture).
This study was needed to try to shut up "rape-the-earth" capitalists.
gde - If I understand the study, it was intended to identify the "best" land for preservation. It was already well accepted that the land needed to be preserved. I just wonder if the millions spent on this study would have been better spent on preserving more of this habitat rather than on identifying exactly which pieces provide the maximum value based on some fancy diversity index. But maybe I am wrong. All we have is the word of 22 scientists that spent 10 years counting animals and plants. If I spent 10 years doing this, I guess I would say it was worthwhile too, and maybe it was.
Ahem, excuse me for just a bit of levity:
LEMURS!
Thank you. :)