EMAIL SIGN UP!
Most Popular This Week
- Wisconsin Bill Would Treat Organic Milk, Sharp Cheddar, Brown Eggs as "Junk Food"
- Patent Filing Claims Solar Energy ‘Breakthrough’
- Climate Change's 'Evil Twin': Ocean Acidification
- Disaster Capitalism Strikes as Hedge Funds Circle Near-Bankrupt Municipalities Like Vultures
- Ignoring Bee Crisis, EPA Greenlights New 'Highly Toxic' Pesticide
- Patent Filing Claims Solar Energy ‘Breakthrough’
- Wisconsin Bill Would Treat Organic Milk, Sharp Cheddar, Brown Eggs as "Junk Food"
- Climate Change's 'Evil Twin': Ocean Acidification
- In 'March Toward Disaster,' World Hits 400 PPM Milestone
- Ignoring Bee Crisis, EPA Greenlights New 'Highly Toxic' Pesticide
Popular content
Today's Top News
Evicted Chagos Islanders Get Blueprint For A Longed-For Future
It is nearly 40 years since the Chagos islanders were evicted by the British government from their Indian Ocean home, but the legal battle aimed at giving them the right to return is still continuing.
This week, in the House of Lords, a resettlement plan for the islanders will be symbolically presented to the Chagossians' leader in exile in the hope of speeding a conclusion to the bitterly fought dispute.
The residents of the archipelago were removed in 1971 to make way for a military base in Diego Garcia. They were dispatched to Mauritius and the Seychelles, where many have since died in poverty. They received limited compensation in 1982 in return for signing away their rights to return and in 2002 they were granted British citizenship.
Ten years ago the Chagossians, some of whom now live in England, began legal action for the right to return, and in 2000 the divisional court ruled their eviction illegal. The foreign secretary at the time, Robin Cook, agreed they should be allowed to return to all the islands except Diego Garcia.
However, after the September 11 attacks in the US, Diego Garcia became an important base for the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq. In 2004 the UK government issued orders in council which negated the court's ruling, but two years later the high court ruled in favour of the Chagossians. In May last year the government lost again at appeal. In November the Lords granted the government leave to appeal but ordered it to pay all legal costs, regardless of the decision. The case has been allotted five days from June 30, after which every legal avenue will have been exhausted.
Richard Gifford, lawyer for the Chagossians, said: "We have now had three decisions in our favour, involving a total of seven judges." It would need "quite a cataclysm to decide that all seven were wrong". He added: "Legally, it is the end of the road for the government."
At the heart of the Chagossians' case is their claim that the resettlement is feasible, even given the time lapse. Tomorrow, the first independent resettlement plan will be handed to the Chagossian leader, Olivier Bancoult, in the presence of MPs, MEPs and peers, in what the islanders and supporters hope will be a persuasive case for a retreat by the government. The study, backed by the Let Them Return campaign and written by John Howell, former director of the Overseas Development Institute, suggests there are "no physical, economic or environmental reasons" why resettlement on the islands of Peros Banhos and Salomon should not happen. It suggests about 150 families, fewer than 1,000 people - about a quarter of those entitled to go back - would want to return. Eco-tourism and fish exports could provide jobs and income. The total cost to the UK of resettlement would be about £25m.
An FCO spokesman confirmed that the government appeal would go ahead.
© 2008 The Guardian
Comments
Note: Disqus 2012 is best viewed on an up to date browser. Click here for information. Instructions for how to sign up to comment can be viewed here. Our Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines. Note to Readers: Spam Filter May Capture Legitimate Comments...

9 Comments so far
Show AllJustice delayed is justice denied.
Righting a wrong of empire.
Bravo!
Let's hope it's a sign of many more corrections to come...
Out of Iraq now!
This is good news,bravo indeed. Unfortunately, the archipelago will be probably submerged before long.
Don't you love (NOT!) how governments, or anyone with too much money, appeal(s) decisions until they get the answer they want? Or, more usually, until the poorer party runs out of funds. At least the Lords have decided that the government now pays costs whoever wins (which sounds to me highly irregular, and they obviously know what the government is up to).
I believe the Chaggossians who were relocated were already British citizens as according to what I've read from John Pilger. Only they were dark skinned British citizens and the British citizens on the Falkland Islands were white.
The Chaggossians were being relocated at the time the Brits went to war with Argentinia to the so called rescue of the white Falklanders.
Watch Fiji - We are planning a base on one of the outlying islands - removing population as I understand. Does anyone know for sure? Several Fijians I know corroborate the story but I am not sure.
What this article fails to mention (except in the photo caption) is that the Chagossians were removed to build a US airbase. And this after the US had scouted the place out and knew full well there was an indigenous population that had to go. To learn the full story of how these people were illegally evicted from their homeland and forced into a life a poverty and sickness, check out the video 'Stealing A Nation' by John Pilger who was mentioned earlier. Just another example of the immoral, criminal and terrorist behavior of the US and British governments who will never dismantle a US military base to make way for its rightful inhabitants. Take a look at the place on Google Earth by searching Diego Garcia, British Indian Ocean Territory or locate 7Ëš18'43"S, 72Ëš24'53"E. Does it look like the Chagossians will be going back there?
A detailed timeline of the Chagossian's eviction from the islands:
http://www.cooperativeresearch.org/timeline.jsp?timeline=diego_garcia
Thank Goodness the Judge's ruling 20 years ago was acted upon so hastily.