EMAIL SIGN UP!
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
The Greatest Silence: Rape in the Congo
"Rape has always been used as a weapon of war" is the opening line of the new documentary film The Greatest Silence: Rape in the Congo. For 76 minutes the film exposes the incredibly brutal civil war that has raged for over ten years in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC). Not only have over four million people been killed, but over 250,000 women and girls have been raped, kidnapped, and tortured.The film, which premiers on HBO April 8th, vividly captures the silent and often ignored rape survivors in their country where chaos and violence are part of every day. One element that makes the film so powerful is that director Lisa F. Jackson has a reason to feel very much connected to the subject matter: in 1976 she was gang-raped as she was leaving her Washington D.C. office late at night. The three men who attacked her were never caught.
Jackson bravely traveled alone to the war torn regions of eastern Congo interviewing rape survivors; her own rape allows her to make a special connection with the Congolese women. In one scene, when Jackson tells her own story, the women suspect that such an atrocity could not happen in the United States. One woman asks her, "Was there a war in your country?" Everyone seems doubtful until Jackson produces the newspaper articles documenting her story. Jackson slowly gains everyone's trust, and the resulting footage is truly harrowing.
"It became so much woman to woman. I very quickly lost that sense of them being 'other.' It made it easier, but it also made it harder...there were a lot of tears alone in my room at night," said Jackson during a recent phone interview. "I would find myself, at Panzi or in the bush for instance, and there were entire villages of women who had been raped - there was not a woman there who had not suffered."
The unending conflict in the DRC has led to an exponential increase in the number of rapes. Most of the rapists are members of the armed militias, and therefore have impunity. The film makes it clear that prosecution is unlikely because most survivors do not report their rape and, even if they do contact the authorities, there is only one person - National Police officer Major Honorine Munyole - who investigates sex crimes in the eastern portion of the country.
Shame and social stigmas are universal and often prevent women anywhere from reporting rape; in the DRC these attitudes are particularly prevalent. As Marie Jeanne, a 34 year old mother of eight tells Jackson, she was gang-raped by five Rwandan soldiers when she was five months pregnant and was too ill to escape. Her husband, who later left her and their children, told the family that Marie Jeanne "wanted to be raped." Sadly, this attitude of blaming the survivor is all too common: many women find themselves abandoned by their families after being raped.
Viewers should be warned of the film's truly upsetting content. Survivors describe the brutality of their rapes very bluntly. Your heart will break when 12 year old Safi, whose eyes are much too sad for someone so young, describes being raped at age 11 while soldiers looted her home.
Women of all ages vividly describe being raped by soldiers who also use sticks and guns to literally mutilate their genitalia and internal organs. The three soldiers who raped 70 year old Maria told her "you're not too old for us." After being raped, women must not only suffer the physiological consequences of sexual violence, but many, including Niota, who was raped by two soldiers at the age of 42, must endure a life of fistula and incontinence. Over thirty percent of women raped in the DRC contract HIV/AIDS.
The strength of the Congolese women Jackson meets is inspiring. Even after being raped and subsequently rejected by their families, women will walk for months through dense forests in search of urgent medical care. Once they reach a hospital - such as the Panzi hospital, which specializes in treating survivors of sexual violence - they must then wait even longer for a hospital bed to become available.
Panzi's medical director Dr. Denis Mukwege, who personally treats many of the rape survivors, asks the unfortunately obvious questions, "Why is this happening? Why use sex in order to humiliate and defeat someone? To threaten someone so they flee their village? Why use sex? This is the monstrosity of this century."
One wonders about the men who would commit such heinous acts against innocent women and girls. Jackson, along with United Nations translator and liaison Bernard Kalume, travel deep into the jungles of the Congo to interview soldiers. That footage, which Jackson only obtained by putting herself in grave danger, is also incredible.
For the most part, the soldiers take little responsibility for their actions; none seem remorseful. Rather, they blame the civil war for creating a situation where they must be away fighting instead of being in their villages with their families. As one man tells Jackson, he makes women suffer because he is suffering.
There is also a markedly misogynistic rationale behind the rapes: the soldiers express the deep-rooted social belief that women are inferior and therefore men can take what they want from them - including sex. Even when Jackson directly asks the men how they would feel if their mothers and sisters were raped, the grave reality of the sexual violence these soldiers have committed doesn't seem to resonate with them.
After witnessing these interviews, Kalume - whose first wife, a Tutsi, was murdered during Rwandan genocide in 1994 - is very upset about what his native Congo has become. He thinks of his daughters and the terrible fate that befalls so many Congolese women. "If a society cannot protect women and kids, what kind of society is that?" asks Kalume. "If men themselves start to torture, to kill, to kidnap, to rape women and teenagers, how can you say this is normal, a society of human beings? It becomes just a real jungle - that is what we are living in - it's a real jungle."
In the DRC, two-thirds of women are illiterate and most do not have any employable skills. Couple that with a crumbled infrastructure and few resources, and you have the desperate situation of Congolese rape survivors. Jackson visits a Catholic church where nuns have organized a support group for them. While the group is able to help women cope emotionally, the church doesn't have enough food, medicine, or clothes to go around.
Such extreme poverty should not be happening in a country with such vast natural resources. But the Congolese people are not benefiting from the gold, diamonds, and coltan (a metallic ore used in all computers, cell phones, and DVD players) sales; instead, most of the natural resources are stolen and illegally exported - and ironically the profits then fuel the conflict.
While The Greatest Silence: Rape in the Congo is very personal and informative, Jackson's tone is never heavy-handed or didactic. Prior to her trip to the DRC, she had collected cosmetic samples to give to the women she planned to meet and interview. But after meeting women whose hardships are almost too terrible to be real, Jackson realizes that giving a rape survivor who has contracted HIV/AIDS a miniature lipstick just seems trite and irrelevant. Jackson's honesty and candor are extremely refreshing.
If you watch the documentary expecting easy solutions, know that the film doesn't present any. According to Jackson, "There are so many little components that must fall into place for them to have futures, not to just merely exist." The official international response - by UN peacekeepers and international aid groups - has made few inroads. Some UN peacekeepers have even been accused of rape themselves and of trading necessities, such as milk and bread, for sex. On the other hand some female international aid workers have been raped by the militias.
In July of 2007 a United Nations Human Rights Council on violence against women report found, to no one's surprise, that sexual violence was rampant in the DRC and the government's response was almost non-existent. In January of 2008, a peace deal was signed which included an official cease fire and resettlement program. But these official reports and policies are doing little to aid the plight of rape survivors. And there is already a second generation of survivors: the children of rape - including three year old Lumiere, who was conceived when her mother Imakile was raped by two Rwandan soldiers at age 15 - who must contend with the social stigmas associated with sexual violence.
I saw the film at the Sundance Film Festival where it won the Special Jury Prize: Documentary. The press screening was the first festival event where I did not have to wait in line; when the film started, the theatre was only half full. I don't know if the poor turnout was a reflection of people's lack of interest in the subject matter, or if people just want to ignore the human rights violations happening a world away because hearing women describe their horrific rapes and torture is so gut-wrenching.
Jackson hopes that the documentary will start a grassroots movement for change, similar to the movement to end the genocide in Darfur. Even if viewers don't lobby the United States Congressional Subcommittee on Human Rights and Law - as Jackson did on April 2nd - she hopes "that people are motivated to find out more and educate themselves on the conflict."
After watching The Greatest Silence: Rape in the Congo it is painfully obvious that the international community, individuals and governments alike, cannot continue to silently stand by for another ten years. Already generations of women have been emotionally and physically brutalized while their unrepentant perpetrators enjoy immunity.
Jessica Mosby is a writer and critic living in Berkeley, California.
Copyright © 2008 The Women's International Perspective
Comments
Note: Disqus 2012 is best viewed on an up to date browser. Click here for information. Instructions for how to sign up to comment can be viewed here. Our Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines. Note to Readers: Spam Filter May Capture Legitimate Comments...

20 Comments so far
Show AllRight now on CD the KBR Rape story thread has had 55 participants. And there is a picture of a white female w/ lip-gloss to help the interest factor
Here a story about a quarter of a million black women raped and worse; six posts.
Rascism.
Black lives are worth the least.
Then Brown.
Then Yellow.
Then White.
The rape of Congolese Women by the militias is fueled by international companies paying for what the militias pull out of the ground-Diamonds and Cobalt significantly.
All diamond exports from the Congo are via IDI Diamonds, an Israeli company.
The Cobalt is paid for by a few corporations, primarily Cabot out of Ohio.
I would personally groin-shoot every single rapist if lined up they stretched around the globe, but that sentiment does no real good to the women hurt, raped and murdered.
Publicizing Cabot & IDI's direct role-they PAY THE RAPISTS-making that understood is a first step.
Peace to all women and deserving men.
I think there is some silence on this issue due partly to an acceptance of domestic violence, a general regard of african women as less worthy of media coverage, and partly due to a fear of appearing Un-PC for criticizing inter-African social relations.
No matter what companies are doing there, or what the history of slavery was,, they are not making black men shoot women in the groin. Just as they arent responsible for black men and women torturing their children for religious reasons:
http://news.independent.co.uk/world/africa/story.jsp?story=553679 21 August 2004 By Basildon Peta, Southern Africa Correspondent "They first hit 10-year-old Sello Chokoe with a blunt instrument, causing a gash on his head. They then chopped off his penis, his hand and his ear. They were harvesting his body parts for "muti" - the murderous practice of traditional African medicine."
They certainly have their own problems over there devoid of western interference.
an aid project: http://www.afjn.org/dr_congo/ -
Congolese voices are not being heard, links to opportunities to help
DemocracyNow on corporate activity in Congo extracts fromJan 2008
http://www.democracynow.org/2008/1/23/corporations_reaping_millions_as_congo_suffers
From the US:Cabot Corporation, Boston, Massachusetts; former CEO of Cabot Corporation is Samuel Bodman, current Secretary of Energy in the Bush administration. OM Group out of Cleveland, Ohio Freeport-McMoRan, who acquired mining rights from Phelps Dodge out of Phoenix, Arizona, who have been involved in copper exploitation in the Congo. And Global Witness said the copper mines, the Tenke Fungurume mine that Freeport-McMoRan has, represents one of the richest deposits of copper in the world. However, the Congolese government and Congolese people are not benefiting from the contracts that were established and that provided Freeport-McMoRan with those resources.
The reports from the Congolese government state that eighty percent of the population live on thirty cents or less a day, while you have billions of dollars going out the back door and into the pockets of mining companies.
AMY GOODMAN: Maurice Carney, you write how the $500 million investment in assuring, well, then-President Kabila's ascendancy to power "was the beginning of the pay off for the West's investment. It is for this reason," you say, "that many Congolese surmised that Kabila was summoned to Washington in October 2007 because he may have strayed from the game plan when he signed a $5 billion deal with China." Even as he ventured there, you say, to Washington, "he first had to stop in Phoenix, Arizona to visit Tim Snider (recently replaced by Richard Adkerson), CEO of Freeport-McMoRan Copper & Gold."
MAURICE CARNEY: Right, a "civil war" is a misnomer. Congo has been invaded twice, first in 1996 primarily by Rwanda and Uganda, when they installed Kabila in power, and they did this with the backing of the United States. They could not have invaded the Congo without the backing of the United States, as Cynthia McKinney documented in her congressional hearing in 2001. Then, when Kabila did not serve the interests of the Rwandans and the Ugandans and the US, then he was gotten rid of. He was assassinated on January 16, 2001.
The Rwandans and Ugandans then invaded the Congo a second time in 1998. And it was this second invasion that the study from the IRC—it has been documented—where 5.4 million Congolese have died. Fifty percent of those Congolese are less than five years old. And the main cause of death is not so much of violent conflict, but from treatable diseases such as diarrhea and pneumonia, all diseases that can be treated. So you have basically Rwanda and Uganda playing a destructive role in the Congo.
http://www.democracynow.org/2008/1/23/corporations_reaping_millions_as_congo_suffers
The former CEO of Cabot is now the Secretary of Energy....thank you old goat for your post.
The rascism here is depthless....fathomless; imagine white American men and women caring so little about white women and children dying.....the outrage would be incendiary-but these are black women-
God is a Black Woman.
This is another sad episode in a land that has been ruthlessly pillaged by outsiders since the days of the Congo Free State under King Leopold II and the Force Publique.
This is indeed one of the most overlooked cries on the planet. A real nightmare senario which is the end product of centuries of colonialism. There is no easy answer but certainly it is the kind of situation the demands UN intervention to disarm these militias -- many of which are renegades of the Ruanda genocide.
The ongoing rape of the Congo, including Congolese women, is indeed among the most disgusting phenomena happening among humans today. Which says a lot, with all the abominally disgusting perversions of our potential for mustering mutual love going on in the world.
As the article-writer points out, these facts of life are so "gut-wrenching" to look at or think closely on, that we too soon reach a point where all we manage to do is to turn away - to preserve some semblance of peace of mind.
A quick run-down: half the 6.75 billion people on Earth live in poverty on US$ 2 a day or less. The ones on $ 2 are the lucky ones (apart from us super-rich 1.3 billion internet-accessers), as 0.85 billion of us humans live/survive in starvation. Some 35,000 die from malnutrition/starvation daily, mostly children - but population-increase is some 250,000 a day. That means for every one person starving to death there's 6-7 new persons eager to survive ready to take that person's place in the global human food-chain. This is what in classic Marxism is called a "surplus labor-force" for the world-capitalism system. This is a system that by corporate law has maximum growth as a default-purpose.
What "max growth default-purpose" means is that UNLESS something other than max growth is explicitly stated in the corporate charter, it is illegal for the corporation NOT to seek max growth at all times. Think on it: this happens on a planet with known finite resources. In simple terms it means we're forcing ourselves to deplete any resource we can find, in order to grow with no other purpose than to keep growing. That also happens to be the nature of cancer, until the cancer-growth kills the host. Our «host» is our human society on Earth (not Earth itself).
A growing labor-force is a crucial element to keep growth going. And of course the starving billion at the bottom of this ongoing pyramid-scheme will kill, rape, torture, steal, cheat and basically do anything to survive. That's a big reason why at least 1,500 die every day from gun-fire, in war or other ways of murder – one every minute.
Such are some secrets of our affluent life-styles in the global «West».
Had enough yet? About to turn away from this quick summing-up? Fine. Then I won't mention the ecological disasters looming and actually happening right now. I won't mention that USA-sized plastic swamp in the Pacific ocean we've recently become aware of (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_Pacific_Garbage_Patch). And hah! - don't give me anything about climate-change: that's sooo last year...
I don't blame anyone who's individually turning away from these facts of current human life, including politicians. It's simply too much for any single person to think on. That's why we need each other so much now. We need one another to tell each other that maybe after all we can do better toward our human family. We need each other to face this dire situation with mutual support and hope of improvement. Because it's a fact as solid as a wall that we are unable to think fully through this situation on our own, unsupported by hope.
I myself keep turning away to Nature, breathing deeply in thought-free meditative reconnecting with that source in the Nature I've grown from, to regain hope and power to think further into how sadly brutal we humans have grown to be to one another, in the strife for a growth in material wealth that has become impossible – and to think on to how our deep self-contradictions in ways of living may be made sustainable, starting with myself.
The good news is our human ingenuity makes it possible for one half of 6.75 billion live in relative material wealth. That's actually as many as there were people on this planet in the mid-1960'ies.
Yes, the world's population has doubled since 1965, about when the term «population-explosion» became popular. That doubling has a lot to do with reluctance on the part of the leaders of this world to curb population-increase. Stopping growth in people means stopping growth in global economy. That means the richest not getting richer and the poorest not finding new livelihoods any longer. That again means the unfairness of the distribution of wealth in the world becoming starkly clear. Which yet again means global social instability until the readjustment (euphemism for war, famine, pestilence and death) to better global equality is complete. That may take some time, depending on how smart we collectively manage to be. But smart we are, and therein lies our hope.
If only we can change the mindless default-growth of the otherwise clever capitalist system for consensus-purposes we all can be content with. If we make everyone materially content, which is quite easily feasible, then real, deep happiness will strike individually whenever natural circumstances allow for it – which will be a lot more often than now. Even for the richest.
For anyone who's stayed with me reading all the way to here: thank you. I needed your hoped-for company to pull my mind through this morass, all the way to this reasonably happy shore.
Now go enjoy life, while aware of the heavy tasks we're all involved in.
The «greatest silence» in the world today is how we richest are raping our own happiness by not naming and righting the wrongs we're complicit in.
The solution is to speak up and create a situation that honestly can be described as «world peace of mind». Participation in that task is our common source of meaningful living, and there is no other source of true meaning. The creation of that «world peace of mind» as shared feeling of contentment, and thereby happiness, is the most fun we can have – as it takes every faculty of all of us. Then we're all won.
ULLEARN: I enjoyed your post, agree with most of it.
One factor here is that RAPE is not just going on in Africa, and the fact that it is ubiquitous speaks strongly about the devaluation of women, their bodies as a basis for life's continuum, and by spiritual extension, the sacredness of the Divine Feminine, an essence largely absented from all patriarchal religions. To the extent males are taught that God is a man, a false sense of privilege and entitlement extends.
For the callous brutality of the prevalence of rape in parts of Africa, consider that female Indian babies are often killed. In much of the Arab world, a female who steps out of extremely rigid protocols can be MURDERED for the alleged "honor crime," and if she is raped, SHE is blamed. A U.N study showed that about 50% of women WORLDWIDE will know male violence during some portion of their lifetimes.
I am glad that a few men spoke up on this thread, and while the heinous disgregard for females and their bodies resembles all hell breaking loose in these African nations where tribe has been pitted against tribe, the truth is that women are at risk EVERY WHERE. The US media has gone back to sexist standards and themes that existed before the "feminist" revolution, and now girls in their teens rush into sex and many are left as single mothers with children to raise. What is called for is a HOLY respect for life, and an appreciation for being given human bodies that are themselves gateways to this magnificent, mysterious force called LIFE. THAT must be honored everywhere, for every race, every culture and both genders!
Ullern; Killer Post.
Only one question "stopping growth in people means stopping growth in global economy"
I wonder there. I'm not sure negative population growth would depend on diminished economic growth.
But a real smart guy said population growth was "the motor of hisory" and this genius has been dead on...your exploring his logic is dead on intellectually. (this i submit humbly)
Great Day. Peace.
Siouxrose; I always read your posts and wish badly more people cared about their Sisters and Mother Earth.
This is out of left field, but here goes; I have a short story in a woman's magazine right now, written in the first person....although my lead character Stephanie, I really take aim at the 'average american male,' (non) mentality...
I wondered if you or anyone would read it? the first paragraph? And see if it pulls you through?
respectfully, mdp
MikePeters: Souixrose is most definitely one of the most valuable assets to the CD posting board. Please call on your angels and goddesses so that she may be safe and protected always.
I would read your first paragraph (even the second and the third, too) with pleasure.
little_lambs_11@yahoo.com
TRU ORANGE: Thank you for the wonderful compliment, and may I say your timing is Divine! One of my mentors, if by posthumous instruction (LOL) is Edgar Cayce and I often think about his statement, "Family life is the hotbed of karma." I am dealing with almost impossible issues with my daughter and your kind statement helps my state of mind today!
MIKE PETERS: Congratulations! Getting published in any venue is a true achievement! I would be happy to read the paragraph. (Currently I appear to be practicing the mystic's capacity to bi-locate and am living between two locations, so if I don't get back to you immediately, it's due to pressing concerns.) You can email me the story at: Rousingthunder55@aol.com and please notate the CD connection so I don't delete the mail. Thank you for YOUR vote of "spiritual confidence," too!
Just for humor, when I was raising my two daughters as teenagers (as a single Mom) and they'd want to go out to some event and I knew through astrology that there were attendant dangers, my daughters would beg me, "Please, Mom, can we ask THE cards?" And sometimes I'd relent, and if they chose Tarot cards that seemed positive, I'd consider myself out-voted by a higher authority. On tougher issues my favorite line to them was, "Next time don't choose ME as a parent!" And they'd happily respond, "Don't worry, I/we won't!" Gotta laugh when the mundane goin gets rough! Venus, the planetary ambassador of love is being impeded (symbolically) by Pluto, the dark lord of all forms of subterfuge in this season of Mars. Interesting that old "mr. guy-love" himself, Heston, died on the Aries (ruled by Mars) new moon, a fitting departure as per the "as above, so below" inviolate equation!
Ooops.. I meant Mister GUN love...
Story sent Souixrose, TruOrange, ThankYou.
Good Riddance Charlaton.
Peace to all women and deserving men.
MIKE: I didn't see it arrive? You can try my Yahoo account...
People tell me things don't always arrive via AOL and I have no idea why, although the premise that we are being spied on seems apt.
Astrologo77@yahoo.com
Gosh & Darn he cried! Then this way,
At moxiemag.com on the very red homepage for moXie magazine, there is a section called 'family, friends and lovers' The Short Stories. Clicked on you'll find them By Title in the left hand margin. Mine is called Seeds of Doubt.
Under 'More Stories' Thank You-hope it pulls you through, mike peters.
The tragedy in the Congo has a long history starting with the depredations of King Leopold of Belgium in the 1800's. Leopolds army carried out amputations, killing, torture of unimaginable scale in the Congo. Mark Twain wrote about it.
In the middle 1900's anti-colonialist democratic Patrice Lumumba gained power in a popular movement and was promptly murdered, sponsored by guess who. Lumumba was replaced by the kleptocratic amoral Mobutu and company who would support the ability of foreign mining companies to extract and remove mineral wealth. Women's rights were no longer even an issue. Mobutu was a pig in every way, but he was our pig.
All traces of democracy were systematically suppressed. All wealth was taken by foreign countries and the Mobutu gang. The boats that supported ordinary commerce, river boats, were allowed to fall apart over several decades leaving people without any way to get or sell food crops or earn a living.
Living conditions in the Congo have been dire and brutal for a long, long time. The men who are now killing and raping in unusually large numbers were raised as children in horrible chaos and poverty in which raw power and brutality were proven to be the only way to get anything. Kind men were weak and would get killed.
It is a mystery to me why some people raised in brutal conditions keep the light of love somewhere in their hearts and some become hard and damaged. I know there are good people left in the Congo. May they prevail.
Sadly, the whole world in the era of "friendly fascism" and corporatism and utter greed...(etc)...is absolutely FULL of rape. Raping women, or men, or children...is so common that it hardly bears attention, never mind effective scrutiny- better to read about what starlet is not wearing her panties- or who is sleeping with "conquest" number 666... The rape of the Earth, the rape of communities, the rape of civil society, of education- sadly this word, so ugly and so hateful- works in these times for virtually every interaction of one human being with another, virtually anywhere, virtually at any time, when imperial or corporate or other "needs" must be met.
If we took the damage done in the name of profit, fascism, religion, ethnicity and so on, and applied the word "rape" to it- the visceral repulsion MAY, sadly, help give more of the necessary urgency to an EFFECTIVE fight against all this
destruction of humanity and the environment.
I am a male feminist because I have learned from the women in my very large extended family that if men are not in some way feminists-that is to say in some way effectively aware of women's needs in these nasty times- there is little else left but MACHO- and the line to worse and much worse starts on its downward spiral.
The downward spiral is terrible human capability/trait to enter into- there is such a gradual dimunition of capacity/feeling/understanding in this state that we can become the proverbial frog in the boiling water- unaware of our own terrible end until it is too late.
That is what has happened in the Congo. Under many different influences, including greed and various human pathologies- the people- men and women- become daily victims in a horrible "stew" that gets closer to boiling, or even boils over- with no effective intervention. After all, who might care about black frogs or brown frogs- brown or black human beings, when so much profit is to be had.
I pray for the end of this era when just about anything- anything - can trump the value of a human being, particularly the value of women- particularly the value of a woman who is "other" to the very,very worst people in positions of power. These people, sadly, are typically white, and typically rather local.
Why are Mr.Barack Obama and Ms Hilary Clinton silent about the death of 5,000,000 people in the Democratic Republic of Congo?
Why are they silent about the rapes of women and children of the Democratic Republic of Congo?
Why this silent ?