Get News & Views Updates
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
Sportswriters Swoon Over DC Ballpark
So much for the house that Woodstein built. Rarely has the coverage of an event been so pandering, so utterly absent of objectivity than the Washington Post's coverage of the debut of the Washington National's new stadium.
The Post reported on the ballpark's grand opening with hard-hitting articles like, "Lapping Up a Major Victory, and Luxuries, at New Stadium." Without irony, the article quoted people from the suburbs of Maryland and Virginia, about how much fun they were having playing Guitar Hero and eating authentic DC half-smokes before the big game. It should have come with coupons for the Make Your Own Teddy Bear booth.
But that was nothing compared to Post sports columnist Tom Boswell, who long ago cornered the market on sloppy baseball nostalgia.
Some Boswell gems from opening night included, "Imagine 25,000 people all smiling at once. Not for a few seconds, but continuously for hours. You won't see it at a tense World Series. But when a brand new ballpark opens, especially in a city that hasn't had such an experience for 46 years, people can't help themselves."
In a nod to actual journalism, Boswell did manage to raise a few questions. "Are they worth the money? Has MLB mastered civic extortion, playing one city against another?" But have no fear. He had no answers. "That's a different story, a different day." Unfortunately it's a story over the last two years he has never written on any day. He did quote another suburban warrior making the trek into the big bad city who said, "Sometimes you got to spend money to make money." Of course, not his money, but why quibble?
Boswell was a model of restraint compared to city columnist Marc Fisher. In a piece titled, I kid thee not, "The City Opens the Ballpark, And the Fans Come Up Winner," Fisher wrote, "An investment in granite, concrete and steel buys a new retail, residential and office neighborhood. It buys the president of the United States throwing out the first ball. And it buys a son showing his father what his boy has become." (I don't even understand that last line. A son shows his father...his boy? So the father is a grandfather? Is this some sort of Southern Gothic goes to the ballpark? Maybe Fisher was just blissed out on $8 beers and making his own teddy bears.)
While Boswell and Fisher were given prime column real estate to gush, columnist Sally Jenkins didn't even get a corner of comics page. It's understandable why Jenkins, the 2002 AP sports columnist of the year, didn't get to play. Four years ago, she refused to gush: "While you're celebrating the deal to bring baseball back to Washington, understand just what it is you're getting: a large publicly financed stadium and potential sinkhole to house a team that's not very good, both of which may cost you more than you bargained for and be of questionable benefit to anybody except the wealthy owners and players. But tell that to baseball romantics, or the mayor and his people, and they act like you just called their baby ugly. It's lovely to have baseball in Washington again. But the deal that brings the Montreal Expos to Washington is an ugly baby."
Jenkins words have come to pass. But this isn't just an "ugly baby", it's Rosemary's baby. It's $611 million of tax payer money in a city that has become a ground zero of economic segregation and gentrification. $611 million over majority opposition of taxpayers and even the city council. $611 million in a city set to close down a staggering twenty-four public schools.
That's $611 million, a mere five months after a mayor commissioned study found that the District's poverty rate was the highest it had been in a decade and African-American unemployment was 51 percent.
That's $611 million, in a city where the libraries shut down early and the Metro rusts over. That's a living, throbbing, reminder that the vote-deprived District of Columbia doesn't even rest on the pretense of democracy. This isn't just taxation without representation. It's a monument of avarice that will clear the working poor out of the Southeast corner of the city as surely as if they just dispensed with the baseball and used a bulldozer. This is sports as ethnic and economic cleansing, as Hurricane Katrina, as Shock Doctrine, as Green Zone. Fittingly, Fisher wrote, President George W. Bush came out to throw the first pitch. Fittingly, he was roundly booed. He stood on the mound, proudly oblivious, taking center stage yet again in what can only be described as occupied territory.
Dave Zirin is the author of Welcome to the Terrordome: the Pain Politics and Promise of Sports (Haymarket) and the forthcoming A People's History of Sports in the United States (The New Press).
Copyright © 2008 The Nation
Comments
Note: Disqus 2012 is best viewed on an up to date browser. Click here for information. Instructions for how to sign up to comment can be viewed here. Our Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines. Note to Readers: Spam Filter May Capture Legitimate Comments...

16 Comments so far
Show AllAs a DC resident and native I am very displeased with yet another huge handout to the wealthy. Build your own damn arena. F*#k baseball and the menial peanut hawker and beer boy jobs it brings. What about the small businesses and homes it swept away? And for what, so people from Va. and Md. can be entertained?
Ways to better spend the money...!? How about fixing the pothole covered roads in this town, funding the libraries, some areas of the city have garbage removal only once a week, how about a new hospital to replace the two that have been shut down, needle programs, HIV and drug education. I could probably go on. The woes of living in a territory within the USA.
The Indypendent has an interesting article that looks at the travesty of Major League Baseball's sponsoring an annual "Civil Rights Game" while club owners loot cash-strapped cities to finance their new boutique stadiums:
"Fantasy Baseball: Major League Baseball Poses as Social Justice Advocate"
Major league baseball is both a sport and a billion-dollar industry. But, is it also a benevolent social institution?
Plenty of people were making that pitch at this weekend's second annual Civil Rights Game in Memphis that featured the New York Mets and the Chicago White Sox.
Launched in 2007 to mark the 60th anniversary of Jackie Robinson's breaking of baseball's color line, this year's Civil Rights Game festivities included panel discussions featuring the children of Robinson, Martin Luther King Jr., Malcolm X, awards ceremonies, highly publicized trips by players to the motel-turned-museum where King was assassinated, Grammy Award-winning artist BeBe Winans sang "I Have A Dream" with a Memphis-area gospel choir and later the national anthem and finally the meaningless exhibition game itself played in AutoZone Park, home of the St. Louis Cardinals' Triple-A affiliate.
"Major League Baseball and its players have contributed immensely to [the civil rights] movement and will continue to play an important role in our society's social history," said Baseball Commissioner Bud Selig who did not bother to attend but instead sent former home run king Hank Aaron to represent him.
"Anytime you can bring attention to a part of our society that needs improvement, and you have a chance to make things better as a result of your participation, you can only be supportive of it," said White Sox general manager Ken Williams.
If only baseball officials felt that way the rest of the year.
For more see, http://www.indypendent.org/2008/03/31/fantasy-baseball
any economic development - even with a lousy first rate MLB team, is going to be good in terms of stiumulating the economy.
611 million spent, invested in the future of DC? Why not? God knows the social programs aren't really making much of a dent. Attract a better element, build a better city.
60-70 years ago it was known as "slumming" wherein the wealthy and priviliged would go to a seedy and disadvantaged neighborhood to play in their own cushy places of amusement.
Otrher ways the money spent on the stadium could be put to better use in DC:
Build a decent public library or two
Build a decdent park or two
Sewage treatment facilities(s) to change the Anacostia from an open sewer to the nice river it was once upon a a long time ago.
You get the idea. How many others familiar with DC can think of some better ways to spend $611,000,000 of tax payer's money?
Can't the sports players and owners pay for their own damn stadiums? The hairdresser normally has to pay for his or won space in the salon. Oh that's right Republican millionaire brat sportsplayers and their Country Club Republicans owners feel that taxpayers are stupid enough to pay for it, and they are right.
It's the old imperial 'keep the masses happy and distracted' trick.
Bread and circuses.
Even has the emperor on hand to throw out the first victim.
Hmm... I wonder if the truckers strike that's in the offing will mean no hotdogs?
Bush was in the stadium on opening night...giving the famous kiss of death to any business he touches
Rarely has the coverage of an event been so pandering, so utterly absent of objectivity than the Washington Post's coverage of the debut of the Washington National's new stadium.
Oh? I can name several other events: The invasion of Iraq, FISA, Military Commissions Act of 2006, approval of torture, the theft of the 2000 and 2004 elections, Cheney's National Energy Policy Development Group, the Recession, devaluation of the US$, gas prices, tax cuts for the rich, post-Katrina construction, etc, etc, etc.
AngstOfThePeople: any economic development - even with a lousy first rate MLB team, is going to be good in terms of stiumulating the economy. 611 million spent, invested in the future of DC? Why not? God knows the social programs aren't really making much of a dent. Attract a better element, build a better city.
ARE YOU ON CRACK?! Do you know the cost of tickets to sports games? How ELSE could that $611 Mil been spent? Oh, I don't know--MAYBE FINANCING THOSE SOCIAL PROGRAMS???!!!
I don't know how decent people like Dave Zirin and Sally Jenkins manage to quell their nausea and continue to cover corporatized professional sports. They are all so obscene it's beyond belief. We might as well all just root for Lockheed-Martin against General Dynamics in the World Series of Death.
Add to this that the base of the practice of most sports, their fandom, is just stupid tribalism and a lot of noise. In the case of major league baseball and most other big American sports, the noise is about misguided psychological identifications with individuals and teams who are much wealthier than their supporters.
YOHOCOMA: I often ask myself--having endured living in GAinesville which off and on has boasted the nation's # 1 football team--how different our nation would be, cities rebuilt, spirit returned, if all the collective testosterone lost on sports--who gets, got or has the ball(s)--was instead directed to things that matter... matter, as in the STATE of our nation, MATTER as in the parade following the dark, faux leader to a war of choice that has battered so many and left so much to rot, die and decay. Bread and circus, indeed... added to Barnum's favorite recipe.
Zwerin blew the lead: "...so ... than ..." A comparison that isn't, somehow. Why can't sports guy write?
Fuckin' A, Dave. Right on target.
Agnst,as the son of a couple that grew up on the Lower East Side of NYC in the teens and twenties, take whatever is impairing your vision off.
In the last 50+ years, we've seen divestment from the cities by state and federal governments, the financial industries and employers.
We've had a "War on Drugs" that has been a continuation on discriminatory law enforcement prior to it.
Most times I've seen increases in service in low income or mixed low-middle communities it's been in collaboration with gentrification. Which doesn't mean better neighbors, just those with higher incomes.
Dave,
I'd love to see your take on the Olympic torch in SF.
What is it with stadia?
In Manhattan and Queens we are replacing two workable baseball stadiums (Yankees and Mets) with new ones. In Brooklyn, developer Bruce Ratner just emptied out a section of land using eminent domain promising a variety of development including low cost housing, office space and a stadium. He just announced that because of the economic downturn, he has cancelled all except guess what ... the new stadium for the Nets.
Each of these deals is subsidized by millions to billions of taxpayer money at a time when all sorts of cuts in schools etc. are being announced.
"What can we doooo??? The economy is baaaad. There is no muhhhhney", whine the NYC and NYS leaders. But there is ALWAYS ready money for war and circuses.
My answer: Stop the f**king military spending. Say something about the war in Iraq. Stop spending on sports facilities where millionaire gladiators play for the amusement of patricians. Say something about corporate abuses that are bleeding us white.
Be real men (and women) instead of jerking off to surrogates doing your fighting on the battlegrounds and in the arenas.
I live in Philadelphia so I was not aware that the city financed the entire $611 million project. That is an insane amount of money to spend on an institution. One thing that is lost though is that this project was funded by bonds not from the general treasury. The real question is what would you do with the money spent repaying the bonds?
If the yearly money generated through taxes is greater than the repayment schedule then its a win win situation. I don't expect that this will be the case however its possible. Is there a wage/income tax in DC? Does DC have concession rights?
Its also silly to say that the nationals are a second rate team. They have a ton of talent in the minor leagues and a respectable nucleus. They'll have trouble dealing with the Phillies (really good young pitchers in the farm system) over the next few years but if their pitching prospects pan out then they'll have a competitive team.