We Mustn't Give Up Fight for King's Cause
April 4 marks the 40th anniversary of the Rev. Martin Luther King's assassination. Forty years later, his dream has been remembered and commemorated. But in many ways, his mission has not yet been realized.
Rev. King always saw the struggle for civil rights has having several movements, like a symphony. There was the movement to end legal apartheid, to gain the right to ride on the bus, eat at the lunch counter, use the public library, attend the public school. That was followed by the struggle to gain the right to vote, which was achieved after the nation recoiled from the scenes of the Selma march.
Rev. King was struck down as he raised the bar. He was working on a poor people's campaign. He was challenging the Vietnam War, and a nation spending far too much on violence and far too little on the poor. In Memphis, he was marching with striking sanitation workers, seeking decent wages.
Rev. King believed this nation should change its priorities, that it should not squander precious lives and resources in distant wars. He believed that every person in this country should be guaranteed what Franklin Roosevelt called his economic bill of rights -- the right to a job with a decent wage, health care, affordable education, a secure retirement, plus the right to organize at the workplace and to be free from discrimination or repression of basic human rights. We put these rights into the United Declaration on Human Rights, but we have not put them into practice in the United States.
Forty years later, Rev. King's mission is still unfulfilled. Today, poverty and unemployment are on the rise. Much of the safety net has been shredded. Welfare has been repealed; unemployment insurance covers fewer workers for less time; low-cost housing is scarce; the minimum wage has lost value; unions are on the defensive, representing less than 10 percent of the private work force. Not surprisingly, we have not witnessed such extremes of inequality since 1929, just prior to the Great Depression.
In his last speech, Rev. King talked about practical actions that could be taken to move the cause forward. So 40 years later, what practical things can be done to fulfill Rev. King's mission?
First, everyone -- particularly the young -- should register and vote. It is a disgrace that so many people sacrificed so much to win the right to vote that so many now do not bother to exercise.
Second, Rev. King urged everyone to be responsible. You can be born in the ghetto without letting the ghetto be born in you. This teaching is neither conservative nor liberal -- it is simply right.
Third, Rev. King today would be challenging the misbegotten war in Iraq that is squandering lives and $12 billion a month in the midst of a civil war far from our shores. He would be calling for reinvesting in America, lifting the minimum wage, empowering workers, making college affordable, investing in first-class education for the children of every class. He would be confronting the disgraceful discrimination that distorts our criminal justice system.
And he wouldn't see these problems as someone else's to solve. He would urge us to stand up, to make our voices heard, to organize. He was, he noted, a drum major for justice. He sought not money or elected office. He sought to empower people to stand on their own feet and exercise their rights, grasp their power. He was taken from us 40 years ago at the age of 39. We best honor his sacrifice by taking up his cause.
--Jesse Jackson
© Copyright 2008 Digital Chicago, Inc.
Twitter
StumbleUpon
Facebook
Delicious
Digg
Newsvine
Google
Yahoo
Technorati
19 Comments so far
Show Allanti decency, you are wrong as hell, and I say that as a white boy from the US South.
Please! You make it sound like we are still living in 1920s Alabama. Do you want change? Pull up your pants, lose the headphones, stop impregnating girls, do well in school, get a job, and instead of whining about discrimination in the justice system, don't break the law in the first place.
I admire MLK, but he would have been smart enough to realize that it isn't the white man or the government or anyone else now who stands in our way - it is ourselves. For this reason, Bill Cosby is also one of my heroes. He encouraged us to look inward and point a finger at ourselves. Jesse Jackson, Al Sharpton, and the rest of these fanatics can whine about injustice all they want. The fact is, WE are to blame if we fail, and WE are responsible for our actions and outcomes. And if our neighborhoods are dirty and dangerous, it is because we made them that way by crapping where we eat.
Garvey, yes I am well aware of the Arawak and their historical experiences. Arawak's are a gentle and good People by any measure. And yes, I am familiar with the struggles of the Six Nations Peoples in Caledonia. I receive their emails keeping me up to date. It's sad to see both the U.S. and Canadian governments conspiring against Indigenous Peoples for their land and resources. The deep racism and resentment of ordinary Canadians toward Six Nations Peoples in Caledonia is eye opening. The Six Nations Peoples historic claims to the land is very clear. People here would have difficulty believing what the Native People in Caledonia went through and how well they acquitted themselves in the face of continuing genocide. The Women title holders honor their people and their ancestors with their brave actions in the face of overwhelming odds. Canada again broke it's word and this struggle is far from over.
I know that there are many Black People who understand and sympathize with the Native struggles and that is good. We need to respect each other and that is why I cite the inconsistencies. I do it for awareness and instruction as opposed to building walls between peoples. Do'hi, (peace)
Doom and Gloom:
Very good points. To this day, I fail to understand why more pro sports teams have not followed St. John's University's lead (they used to be the 'Redmen' now they are the 'Red Storm'). Why isn't there more outrage at the notion of a Florida St. 'Seminole'...that's offensive to BOTH Natives and Blacks!
BTW, I am Black to the naked eye. But look deeper and you will find a many family members with mixed blood (African and the Arawak-speaking tribes of the Caribbean). Many of my family members also have so-called 'Carib' traits...i.e. hazel eyes.
My point is, there are many Black people such as myself who are just as disgusted with the lack of exposure and attention given to the plight of Natives. I should know, I live in Canada...about two hours away from Oka and about 6 from Caledonia (Google each if anyone is unfamiliar with those recent stories).
USAn,
I don't know any "dirt" on Cindy Sheehan and I'm certainly not looking for any. Hadn't even occurred to me. Why does she have anything whatever to do with Obama? Perhaps they might partially share opposition to the Iraq war, just as Jackson and Obama partially share the black race. So what?
I like Obama for Obama and I believe he serves the nation best standing on his own without being diluted by other peoples' names and actions. If he has faults or virtues, they are his, not the tag-on effects of others.
Jesse asks: "So 40 years later, what practical things can be done to fulfill Rev. King's mission?"
Well Jesse, from an Indian perspective, you and other African American People could recognize the American Genocide of one hundred million American Indians. Then, as a small token of recognition African American football players could refuse to play for a team named the Washington Redskins. To Indians the word "redskin" is like the word "nigger" is to you. Would Indians play for a team named the Washington Niggers, NO! So why do Black people play for the Washington Redskins? Can it really be a Rainbow Coalition with this kind of deeply disrespectful and offensive behavior by Blacks? I think not!
I thought Jackson's speech at the last, large DC anti-war protest far exceeded anything Omama has delivered. It brought me to tears.
And how, exactly, is Jackson, in public life, so corrupt again?
And Mr. David, are you digging up dirt of Cindy Sheehan yet? Obama certainly wants to stay away from this extremist radical. I'm sure Obama will be stumping hard for Pelosi in the coming months when he goes to SF. Poor Cindy, she is being Nadered and has even beem banned contributing articles to CD.
USAn,
The reason you can't appreciate Obama is because the wisdom of his tone and understated eloquence is exceeding your intellect.
You need more big words and bombast. He needs less and can speak to elderly folks and fourth graders at the same time with maximum impact to both.
What's wrong with Rev. Jackson is that his own antics have discredited his own message and we don't need that moral failure rubbing off on Obama in the minds of voters. Jackson is Jackson. Obama is Obama. They needn't be mixed just because they partially share a race. And, as usual, you don't "get it" about that either.
I worked for Jesse Jackson's Rainbow Coalition because I thought it was a way of exerting pressure on the Democratic nominee - bringing issues of poverty and discrimination to the Democratic Table. I'm supporting Obama because I think he'll be a great president.
I've seen Dr. King's Dream speech on television - I've heard FDR's radio speech about the only thing we have to fear is fear itself. I think Obama's speech on race was as good as those - breaking with the past in the same way. Jackson's a good speaker; Obama says things that resonate intellectually as well as emotionally.
Brother Freeze, looks like your heart's in cold storage with all this hate black America, attack a black preacher thing. Besides where the hell were you back then? I say this a white boy from the US South who was astanding up for civil rights in those days, and I bet you a white from the US North with all the hypocrisy to show it, like many with their big mouths damn agoing and not doing a damn thing, just proving what black folks have been saying for a long time North ain't nothing but upSouth, and the Mason Dixon Line begins at the Canadian border.
At the risk of being charged with heresy, i personally believe it is time to let go of King and take a real hard look around at where we are now with racial justice and social justice. We need to pay attention to the single mom in the projects because she needs our attention, not to "honor Dr. King". Also we might start thinking about why so many people are so poor, and why so many of the poor are black.
"The best thing that could possibly happen to make some of Dr. King's hopes come true is for Americans to elect Barack Obama. A wisdom similar to King's would then speak from the bully pulpit for four or eight years."
The above quote is utter bullshit. When Obama is able to describe the US as "the greatest purveyor of violence in the world today" or state similar truths, he will be in a league with King. But. it is very likely that if Dr. King had somehow escaped assasination, he would have long ago been chraacter-assasinated and living in obscurity, or in prison, and Obama would be avoiding him as he would Mumia or Leonard Peltier.
Now, what exctly is wrong with Rev Jackson, besides the cadence of his speeches sounding "too black"?
...also consider this regarding the content of Rev. Wright's sermons and the many recent (mis) interpretations (from Wiki):
Martin E. Marty, an emeritus professor of religious history and holder of seventy-five honorary doctorates,[39] explained Wright's view by focusing on his church. Marty stated, "For Trinity, being 'unashamedly black' does not mean being 'anti-white.' [...] Think of the concept of 'unashamedly': tucked into it is the word 'shame.' Wright and his fellow leaders have diagnosed 'shame, 'being shamed,' and 'being ashamed' as debilitating legacies of slavery and segregation in society and church." Marty also asserted that Trinity's "members and pastor are, in their own term, 'Africentric' [African-centered], and that this should not be more offensive than that synagogues should be 'Judeo-centric' or that Chicago's Irish parishes be 'Celtic-centric'."
You're right Jacob, Rev. Wright is no hero (sarcasm). He only accompanied the author (Rev. Jackson) to Libya in 1984 to help negotiate the release of a Navy Pilot, Lt. Robert Goodman.
But you're right. What was that selfish no-good, such and such doing in 1962, when he was 21? Apparently he was "pursuing his own interests" in school.
Never mind that those interests led him to serve the public through his ministry. It's apprently not important to the likes of you, and your flag-waving ilk.
Again, you're right. I couldn't find anything published on the web detailing what the Rev. was doing in 1962. So, following your apprent (il)logic, he must have been doing nothing.
Have you considered that he was active with groups OTHER than MLK? Just a shot in the dark, but perhaps, and I have no proof of this, but perhaps he was involved with SNCC. After all, he was a a student "pursuing his own interests."
Jacob, I am glad to see that you're no longer asking African Americans to be grateful that they are no longer slaves.
Jacob,
I have no idea what Jeremiah Wright was doing back in the 1960s, couldn't care less, and DID NOT remind you or anyone else of Jeremiah Wright. Read the darn posts before you spout off.
We are not voting on Wright. We are voting on Obama. You are knocking him at every turn, probably because of racism or perhaps a love of the corporatists. Don't know. Don't care. But you're offensive and way, way, way off base, off point, and off usefulness.
Thanks to Jesse Jackson for managing to mention the great Martin Luther King without insulting him with comparisons to the hate-freak Jeremiah Wright!
It's been a few weeks since Common Dreams carried a story that named Dr. King without an odious comparison to the miserable Rev. Wright.
Unfortunately, it didn't take long for the generic Democrat Daniel David to remind us of Jeremiah Wright and his disciple Barack Obama.
Maybe Mr. David knows what Jeremiah Wright was doing while Dr. King was risking his life every day in the Jim Crow south.
Wright was 21 in 1962, and in spite of a couple of years in the peacetime Marines, and attending college in Virginia, it seems to me that a "great hero of black liberation" like Jeremiah Wright could have found time to march once with Dr. King.
Did it ever happen? When? Where?
Or did Jeremiah Wright pursue his own interests while Dr. King risked his life and died for black liberation?
You don't have to be much of a "hero" to shoot off your mouth in a church in Chicago.
But when the real heros were marching in the South, where was Jeremiah Wright?
The best thing that could possibly happen to make some of Dr. King's hopes come true is for Americans to elect Barack Obama. A wisdom similar to King's would then speak from the bully pulpit for four or eight years. Jesse Jackson can't help this effort, though. He could only hurt it.
Bill Clinton knew that by resurrecting the Jackson image in South Carolina, and that was the day all of us should have relegated both Clintons to history.
It's time to start writing the next movement in the symphony. It's theme should be something about the right for every human being for a dignified and fulfilling life, regardless of their "station in life". I like the aphorism: "You can be born in the ghetto without letting the ghetto be born in you." I'll commit it to memory.
Oh Jesse please shut up! Even when what you say is correct, your saying it pollutes it with the same foul stench as President George W. Bush saying the oxymoronic words,"compassionate conservative" when he is neither.
Your behavior as leader of Operation Push and your subsequent various scandals make you the worst civil rights era opportunist since Hosea Williams.
Enough of you and away with you! Maybe your son can redeem the family name.