EMAIL SIGN UP!
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
Taser Use Soars as Concerns Mount Over Safety
VANCOUVER - The Royal Canadian Mounted Police (RCMP) has doubled its use of Taser stun guns since 2005, according to an investigation by CBC and the Canadian Press. The RCMP has also been found to be less than forthright in producing information related to Taser incidents.
The use of Tasers by Canadian policing forces has become a national and international issue since Robert Dziekanski, a Polish man wishing to immigrate to the country, was Tasered and killed at the Vancouver International Airport.
The RCMP was ordered to conduct an internal review and there will be further reviews by the British Columbia coroner's office, the Vancouver Airport Authority and the provincial government.
There have been 19 Taser-related deaths in Canada since 2001, and of 563 incidents analysed by the Canadian Press, 75 percent of suspects were unarmed.
The rise in usage of Tasers has been most dramatic in British Columbia, where the number of incidents rose from 218 in 2005 to 496 in 2007, and from 89 to 371 in Alberta in the same period.
The Toronto Police Services Board is planning to buy 3,000 new Taser electric shock weapons for 8.4 million dollars. In 2006, police used the devices 156 times, and all but nine incidents involved people who appeared to have a mental disorder or were in crisis.
The RCMP has also heavily censored documents related to the use of Tasers, citing privacy issues. With the recent deaths in Canada, the RCMP is now coming under further direct criticism for its lack of transparency.
A state known as 'excited delirium', associated with drug use or poor mental health, could also be a contributing factor in the deaths related to the Tasers, according to policing officials.
Taser International, the U.S.-based manufacturer of most of these conducted energy weapons, argues that the weapons have never been directly blamed for a death. Taser International claims it has never lost a lawsuit related to its weapons but some cases have been settled out of court.
Amnesty International reports that 310 people have died in North America following Taser use.
John Tackaberry, a spokesperson with Amnesty International Canada, told IPS, 'The issue is the availability of information around Tasers is inadequate. We are calling for suspension of their use until an independent study can be done. One of the problems right now is that most of the current studies have been done by Taser International, the company who manufactures the Tasers.'
Tackaberry added that additional training needed to be done to ensure that Tasers are not misused by police. He emphasised that the Taser should be a weapon of last resort and that there should be extreme caution toward multiple uses of the weapon on the same person.
In one experiment at Cook County Hospital in the U.S. city of Chicago, 11 pigs were Tasered for 40 seconds and then hit again 10 to 15 seconds later. The pigs were found to have heart problems and two of them died. This is in direct contrast to studies that Taser International has completed internally which verify the safety of the weapon.
There are also leopard-print and hot pink Tasers available for personal use in the United States, some of which have built-in MP3 players. Some states allow citizens to carry Tasers for self-defence.
Murray Mollard of the British Columbia Civil Liberties Association will appear before the House of Commons Standing Committee on Public Safety and National Security as part of their Taser study on Friday Apr. 4. Mollard told IPS that he plans to raise the issue of 'function creep' identified by Paul Kennedy of the RCMP public complaints commission in its interim review on Tasers released in December 2007.
Function creep refers to the ease of usage of the device due to its availability. In his interim recommendations, Kennedy called for Tasers to be placed higher on the use of force spectrum so that negotiation and other interventions would precede use of the device.
Mollard cited a lack of uniform standards regarding training of police forces on Tasers, their use and accountability, and the lack of independent research regarding Tasers. The BC Civil Liberties Association also supports the call for a moratorium on Tasers.
'This is old-time RCMP behaviour in an era that is supposed to be about a different kind of RCMP -- more open, transparent and modern policing under the new leadership of Commissioner Elliott,' he told IPS. 'What this suggests is that it is going to take a long time to turn this large ship around, whether that be with respect to Tasers or a myriad of other issues, and that the political masters can't lose their grip on the bridge. Canadians want more information about police Taser use, not less.'
David Eby of the Pivot Legal Society, a poverty law organisation in Vancouver, told IPS, 'Tasers are a highly visible example of a tendency among police officers to use whatever tools are available to them regardless of the potential impacts.'
'In Ottawa, where police forces have regular training on use of force, they are less likely to use Tasers, guns or force at all,' Eby noted. 'Police officers approach people under the influence of drugs or mental health [problems] and have a lack of training to deal with this situation. It's tempting to put the blame on the Taser, but in Vancouver there's a lack of training of officers to deal with mental health on their day-to-day policing work.'
© 2008 Inter Press Service
Comments
Note: Disqus 2012 is best viewed on an up to date browser. Click here for information. Instructions for how to sign up to comment can be viewed here. Our Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines. Note to Readers: Spam Filter May Capture Legitimate Comments...

22 Comments so far
Show AllHey Tasers are the best thing since pepper spray, and recently police used it on an unruly 11 year old girl:
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,342471,00.html
Welcome to our brave new world.
Where is there a hint of a silver lining in our current and future world, if there is such a thing that includes human beings, animals, birds, water . . . ?
Tasers don`t hurt people, people hurt people. NTA says so. And don`t even think about regulation as the 2nd and a half Amendment gives all of us the right to own one.
In one experiment at Cook County Hospital in the U.S. city of Chicago, 11 pigs were Tasered for 40 seconds and then hit again 10 to 15 seconds later. The pigs were found to have heart problems and two of them died. This is in direct contrast to studies that Taser International has completed internally which verify the safety of the weapon.
*this is an atrocity. What did the pigs do to deserve being torutred? Were they al queda suspects? The real story here is the abuse in science.
Notice that scientists can use competing studies to counteract each other? This is why science is bullshit in these matters.
Its common sense--getting a shock of electricity is bad. You dont need sadists in Chicago torturing pigs to tell us the obvious.
Once more, its science claiming to save us from science.
And some people think the clergy are the only hucksters out there.
I'm glad somebody else knows that people in science are all-too-human, just like everybody else. Before reading any study check to see who paid for it. If it was a corporation or even a branch of the government don't waste your time. The scientists' religion, politics, and prejudices have to be considered too.
Republicans love tasers. Let's test them on Republicans.
I'm sure it wouldn't hurt Dick Cheney in the least if he were tasered, and it might stop him from aggresively attacking Iran.
The continued escalation of taser use by the police and security officers can only be stemed when real empathy is learned by the officers. I think the rule should be that any officer who uses a taser on a citizen, suspect, perp, whatever, must then submit then to being publicaly tasered themselves. That would eliminate frivilous use of tasers, and where it's use is not frivilous, but instead it's used to prevent a truely life threatening situation, what officer would mind a little jolt in return? A Tit-for-tat policy would cut down on the use of tasers. It should be the law!
That a scientists' religion, politics, and prejudices have to be considered should only count as to how the report is presented – it doesn't change the results if any are reached. The report or findings could be downplayed or put in the spin machine to ease their impact.
Clergy, on the other hand is based on faith with no rationale behind it other than the trust that is placed in blind dogma. Faith is the key word in the case of the latter and it is a shame some of those who espouse it don't know and hold their place. But then there is that part of some faiths that says is important to ram one's beliefs down other's throats regardless of the other's wishes. This of course before getting their own house in order or following their own precious doctrines from on high. Science doesn't do that but hey, tell that to a true believer… 6000 years old my ass but I digress…
Tasers are NFG in the hands of mortals… No way, no how. They should be regulated as a firearm as the user has no way of knowing the impact the taser will have on different individuals. And they should not be used frivolously in non-lethal situations even in our non-perfect world.
I just don't get it.. i am a lightweight..scrawny lil shit..140lbs (70kgish).. now some joker is drunk or say ''off his / her meds)..and I have a run in with them.. usually i can take em down if they are even a fair bit bigger than me, and generally get some help from nearby peeps if they are mebe too big
so now we have these trained officers most are pretty big fellas and gals.. and they say they feel threatened enough by some lil asshole who is raving at them and NEED to use a taser.. pfff.. if I had a stick like they do and could use it without being charged with assault for defending myself.. i could drop a lot bigger person than i could bare handed..
what ever happened to the spines of these facists?
sheesh makes ya wanna puke
chessgames56:
It's very interesting how the FauxNews report at the link you provided --which is dated Thursday, March 27--differs from other available reports about that incident. The FauxNews report is terse, and ends with stating that the deputy involved was "treated for a possible broken nose." Additionally, it states the girl threw a chair.
Well, then you read on. At Orlando's Local 6 website--updated as of 5:57 am EDT March 28, 2008--we further learn that Ms. Jiminez's agitation only increased with the approach taken by teachers. This is indicative of teachers not being able to handle children, in my opinion as a teacher of children that very age. By the time the deputy arrived, no doubt she was nearing her peak agitation level.
The more accurate story that the deputy only received a bruised sinus cavity also comes out at this point. Again, I'm just a teacher, but if I were a sheriff's deputy assigned to not only protect such students from outside threats but protect myself from them, you'd think my employer would ensure I'd be able to choose and implement a course of action that avoided both the bruised sinus cavity an the Taser use.
Lastly, you can browse over to the March 29th story at The Orlando Sentinel and discover that the girl has a learning disability. That she is not mentally (or emotionally, I would guess) "normal"--as much as I hate the word "normal." That she is not a violent girl. And that the boy she allegedly pushed even showed up in court to support her.
The girl's mother described the pushing incident as "a mistake," and I'm sure most reasonable people should conclude that a sheriff's deputy using a Taser on an unarmed 11-year old is also "a mistake."
The problem here (well, one of many) is that upon reading the FauxNews report, many might think the use of the Taser justifiable. The rest of the details change the color of that determination, in my opinion. Now, the teachers and deputy had ALL the details, or at least if they were responsible people they certainly should have.
And so should have the officers who killed Mr. Dziekanski (great immigration solution, Canada!) after plenty of time was available for anyone with a pair of neurons to determine he was simply distraught and in need of help.
I agree 100% with Amos: Tasers should be considered deadly weapons. Just like a knife or a gun: you don't know if the attack will be lethal, but all three weapons have the potential to be so. It is wrong to use a deadly weapon to control someone, as the RCMP did in Vancouver and as deputy Donna Hudepohl in Orlando.
I would consider an officer (or anyone) coming at me with a knife, a gun, or a Taser to be a deadly threat to my life. How unfortunate that they would consider the latter of those three to be non-lethal. My responses would be--in order of whatever is most likely to save my life--flee, submit, fight. How unfortunate that they would again consider only the latter.
Thanks for the heads-up on the article, chessgames56, but I think you made one little mistake:
Welcome to our cowardly new world.
Conservative mentality is a mental illness; it truly is. Blind allegiance to a political ideology.
Sounds to me like these police are becoming 'addicted' to 'using' tasers. Now, what kind of program can we offer for them to break their addiction? Is this another misuse of power? And what are the checks and balances here? Who is the authority who steps up and admits 'We are misusing these devices'? This will be interesting.
Why is this not considered torture and is usually perpetrated on people not convicted of any crime. Since when did possibly disturbing the peace become a crime punishable by torture police here tased a woman here after she called from a Wal Mart to report a possible case of child abuse. They tased an 75 plus old man and why did they need to do it. We have had several deaths here in Florida directly related to tasing incidents. Eletrical insults to the body can easily result in death if a person already has a heart condition. Police have little understanding of cardiopathology last time I checked. The heart operates by electrical impulses sent to the muscles of the heart and if you block the normal impulses it can result in death. It is as if you defibrillated someone with a normal heart beat,. Now if you have a normal heart it may take several shocks to kill . Like drug research they only test these things on healthy males 25 to 35. All others may be a crap shoot.
What is the purpose of research with tasers? Everyone knows they incapacitate and hurt people. Perhaps we could do some research on bashing people over the head with tire irons.
Only someone who is educated well beyond their morals and intelligence would try to find a loophole justifying the use of such a dangerous device.
Thank you thewonderingyou -- very well said and moving, and although you mention the teacher's elevated "agitation level", I would go further.
I would add, that I suspect that the officer involved was "damaged goods" and should have been weened from the ability to inflict injury upon others, until proven to be mentally stable.
Perhaps he is a gulf_I vet suffering from PTSD, regardless, he needs treatment - or his wrath will be felt again (and it only gets worse).
Namaste
Police used a taser on a 67-year-old man in Apache Junction, Arizona last week because he "chest-butted" one of them! The cop had only "minor injuries" the report said.
A study has indicated that people tend to die from tasers when you tase someone, and then tase them again a few seconds later. Which is what police tend to do.
Your comment is awaiting moderation
Gosh, I love that. Sweetness and light. Hey CD moderators, feel free to erase this comment if you feel the need. Or better yet, step out of the shadows and explain your algorithm for screening comments to all of us so we won't mis-speak.
sometimes wondering over to yahoo for a new email and screen name is easier,
that being granted access to the EDITOR_lords of the "Emerald City", even with ruby slippers and Toto on a leash, and then you have to wait for the wizard, …
There's no place like /home
"You always had it (ALL) within you Dorthy …"