Get News & Views Updates
Most Popular This Week
- Ten Numbers the Rich Would Like Fudged
- Elites Will Make Gazans of Us All
- Obama Weaves Web of Deceit on Gaza War
- Organic Consumers Association Calls for Boycott of 'Organic' and 'Natural' Brands That Helped Defeat Prop 37
- Journalistic Cliches: 'Surgical Air Strikes', 'Rooting Out Terror', and 'Cyber-Terrorism' Cannot Conceal Reality
Popular content
Today's Top News
Iraq Implodes As Shia Fights Shia
Another tragedy as the Shia majority turn on each other
A new civil war is threatening to explode in Iraq as American-backed Iraqi government forces fight Shia militiamen for control of Basra and parts of Baghdad.
Heavy fighting engulfed Iraq's two largest cities and spread to other towns yesterday as the Iraqi Prime Minister, Nouri al-Maliki, gave fighters of the Mehdi Army, led by the radical cleric Muqtada al-Sadr, 72 hours to surrender their weapons.
The gun battles between soldiers and militiamen, who are all Shia Muslims, show that Iraq's majority Shia community - which replaced Saddam Hussein's Sunni regime - is splitting apart for the first time.
Mr Sadr's followers believe the government is trying to eliminate them before elections in southern Iraq later this year, which they are expected to win.
Mortars and rockets launched from Mehdi Army-controlled districts of Baghdad struck the Green Zone, the seat of American power in Iraq, for the third day yesterday, seriously wounding three Americans. Two rockets hit the parking lot of the Iraqi cabinet. The mixed area of al-Mansur in west Baghdad, where shops had begun to reopen in recent months, was deserted yesterday as Mehdi Army fighters were rumoured among local people to be moving in from the nearby Shia stronghold of Washash. "We expect an attack by the Shia in spite of the Americans being spread over Sunni districts to defend them," said a Sunni resident.
Forty people have been killed and at least 200 injured in Basra in the last two days of violence. In the town of Hilla, south of Baghdad, 11 people were killed and 18 injured yesterday by a US air strike called in support of Iraqi forces following street battles with Shia militia members in the city's Thawra neighbourhood. In Baghdad, 14 have been killed and 140 wounded.
The supporters of Mr Sadr, who form the largest political movement in Iraq, blame the Americans for giving the go-ahead for Mr Maliki's offensive against them and supporting it with helicopters and bomber aircraft. US troops have sealed off Sadr City, the close-packed slum in the capital with a population that is the main bastion of the Sadrists, while the Mehdi Army has taken over its streets, establishing checkpoints, each manned by about 20 heavily armed men. It is unlikely that the militiamen in Basra will surrender as demanded by the government. Sadiq al-Rikabi, an adviser to Mr Maliki, said those who kept their weapons would be arrested. "Any gunman who does not do that within three days will be an outlaw."
Streets were empty in Basra and Baghdad as people stayed at home to avoid the fighting. The Mehdi Army is enforcing a strike in Baghdad with mosques calling for the closure of shops, businesses and schools.
In the Shia city of Kut, on the Tigris south of Baghdad, local residents say that black-clad Mehdi Army militiamen have taken over five districts and expelled the police.
At the same time, Mr Sadr is clearly eager to continue the truce which he declared on 29 August last year after bloody clashes in Kerbala with Iraqi police controlled by the rival Shia political movement, the Islamic Supreme Council of Iraq, and their well-organised militia, the Badr organisation.
He renewed this ceasefire in February, saying he wanted to purge its ranks of criminals. "The freeze that Sadr has ordered is still ongoing," said one of his chief lieutenants, Luwaa Smaism.
Mr Sadr has sought to avoid an all-out military confrontation with American troops or Badr backed by American forces since he fought two ferocious battles for Najaf against US marines in 2004.
Mr Sadr has sent emissaries to Mr Maliki asking him to remove his troops, numbering some 15,000 men from Basra, and to resolve problems peacefully. But his aides say there will be no talks until the Iraqi army reinforcements are withdrawn. The offer of talks is in keeping with Mr Sadr's past behaviour, which is to appear conciliatory but in practice to make few real concessions. The US is claiming that the Sadrists are not being singled out, only Iran-supported militia factions, but this will find few believers in Iraq.
"This is not a battle against the [Mehdi Army] nor is it a proxy war between the United States and Iran," said a US military spokesman, Major General Kevin Bergner. "It is [the] government of Iraq taking the necessary action to deal with criminals on the streets."
The Sunni population is pleased to see the government and the Americans attacking the Mehdi Army, which they see as a Shia death squad. "Before, the Shia were arresting and killing us and forcing us to leave Iraq for Jordan and Syria where we lived in misery," said Osama Sabr, a Sunni in west Baghdad.
The fighting is threatening to disrupt Iraq's oil production, most of which comes from the Basra area, because workers in the oilfields dare not leave their homes.
The militia
The Mehdi Army Armed wing of the Sadr movement. Muqtada al-Sadr's militia is divided, with one wing supporting the radical cleric's ceasefire while another has rejected it and continued attacks on Iraqi government forces and the British base at Basra aiport.
The Badr Brigade Armed wing of the Supreme Islamic Iraqi Council. The Badr Brigade has been involved in numerous clashes with the Mehdi Army and appears not to be the target of the current offensive by the Iraqi government forces. The group has organised "spontaneous" demonstrations against General Mohan and General Jalil.
The Fadhila A political party and armed group with a localised powerbase. The governor of Basra is a member of the party, and it controls a significant proportion of the region's oil supply.
Secret Cells Said to be armed and trained by Iran and allegedly carrying out attacks ordered by Tehran.
© 2008 The Independent
Comments
Note: Disqus 2012 is best viewed on an up to date browser. Click here for information. Instructions for how to sign up to comment can be viewed here. Our Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines. Note to Readers: Spam Filter May Capture Legitimate Comments...


32 Comments so far
Show AllThis may be the first of many steps that will lead to Martial law being declared and canceling the election which
will in turn get millions of average citizens and another
civil war in the U.S. that will make the last civil war in
this country look like a Sunday School Picnic.
I guess bush doesn't even watch his administration's MSM. I just caught the last few minutes of his speech at an Air Force museum and, as usual, it was stupifyingly embarrassing. He said the surge is working, we are winning in Iraq, Iran would be dangerous with "nucular" weapons, so on and so forth, blah, blah, blah - the same old pack of distortions and lies. Then he walks off the stage with that shit-eating smirk, never to answer a question. Wouldn't matter anyway, all questions from his invited choir would never be anything more than - "Sir, do you think we will win in Iraq? Should we let Iran have weapons of mass destruction that they will use against us and Israel?…
Now we know why Fallon resigned!!!
Back-door deal between Bush & Betrayus
Iraq is about to fall into the same fate that bedeviled another part of the former Ottoman Empire, Yugoslavia...and Dubya, Cheney, & Co.'s incompetent greed facilitated the mayhem.
Mission accomplished.
Divide and conquer.
A premature withdrawal from Iraq would endanger Israel, John McCain said Wednesday in a major foreign policy speech to AIPAC. Why is this Iraq war policy all about Israel? Israel has always demanded the removal of Saddam Hussein. Unfortunately, the cost of this wish was not worth a single life. How many more will die to defend Israel?
The Surge is working! If we withdrew from Iraq it would unleash a civil war...um...kind of like this one.
Let's make something clear. It is not "Shia vs. Shia". It is genuinely patriotic Iraqi's fighting puppet forces of under the traitorous friend of the occupier, Al Maliki.
Their sectarian affiliations has little to do with the conflict.
Fight on, brave Iraqis!
Bombs are falling on the green zone... Just as a hypothetical, what happens if the majority of Iraqi's rise up and kill or capture the yank forces in Iraq? 200,000 troops don't have the moxie, nor the ammo, to kill the 5 million Iraqi's who can bear arms. It's not likely, almost an impossibility, but should it happen, what will become of the prisoners? They are occupying a country illegally, Iraq could claim that they're not subject to the Geneva conventions by using the same rhetoric that bushie used. The mercenaries would be killed outright, after all they are paid terrorists.
Far fetched, perhaps. More realistic than bushy's bile at the Air Force Museam...
Al Maliki has miscalculated terribly here. He's give the Madhi Army till Saturday to lay down their arms and obey his government. When they refuse (and guess what the instructions in the Mosque on Friday will be?), he will have to clear Basra. US air power will help, but clearing a city like Basra isn't going to be easy. And there is always the second front the Sadrists can open up, out of Sadr City in Baghdad.
Any one know the Arabic word for "Tet?"
Americans are not paying attention to the sand under thier feet. They don't know thier own history and if they could read the signs well they would better understand what this means. The truth is all around you.
This, imo, obviously is the U.S. using its [puppet] Iraqi govt to try to extend U.S. genocide on Iraq. The Iraqi puppet govt is not demanding anything of the Mehdi Army without this being under direction of the U.S.; we can be certain about, surely. And for the Mahdi Army to hand over its weapons would be for them to stupidly commit suicide, to indicate that they welcome the imperialist-West war of aggression and criminal occupation, and that they're willing to become its SLAVES.
I think everyone realises that there is no way that the Mehdi are going to ever capitulate to the U.S. They must not render their arms.
Quote: "The Sunni population is pleased to see the government and the Americans attacking the Mehdi Army, which they see as a Shia death squad. "Before, the Shia were arresting and killing us and forcing us to leave Iraq for Jordan and Syria where we lived in misery," said Osama Sabr, a Sunni in west Baghdad."
THAT IS ONE SINGLE Sunni Iraq, if he is one at all, and Shia in Iraq consist of much more than only those with Moqtada al-Sadr. I expect that Sunni Iraqis do not believe that all attacks on them have all or even mostly been committed by the Mehdi.
Anyway, surely not all, if even a majority, of Sunni Iraqis would be pleased about this assault on the Mehdi. They wouldn't be, if they critically kept in mind that they definitely have nothing for future with the U.S. fully completing its takeover.
There are always idiots and fools in every large group, but they don't represent everyone in the group.
Quote: "The fighting is threatening to disrupt Iraq's oil production, ...."
Tears come to my eyes, NOT.
I'm not sure about 'The Mehdi Army' being at all significantly split, as Cockburn says. Where does he get this notion from; did he do a poll, or ... what?
Cockburn says with respect to the Badr, "The group has organised "spontaneous" demonstrations against General Mohan and General Jalil".
Okay, so who are those generals, and what have they done that would cause the Badr to demonstrate against them? And of what significance is it? Cockburn should have known well enough to inform readers about this.
I'll bet this can, and is said in arabic:
¡Prefiero morir de pie que vivir siempre arrodillado!
it's very naive to talk about this sitaution without discussion of the role of ango-american covert operations in promoting the antagonisms.
" curmudgeon99 March 27th, 2008 10:35 am
Now we know why Fallon resigned!!!"
THERE MAY BE ABSOLUTELY NO relationship of that kind with these present events; maybe, and while meaning beyond surface appearance.
" sung425 March 27th, 2008 11:34 am
A premature withdrawal from Iraq would endanger Israel, ...."
UNLIKELY. And neither the launching of this war, nor the continuation of it, is for the benefit of Israel. It's incidentally "benefiting", but isn't the primary reason at all. Elaine Brower's article on the 'Winter Soldiers' testimonies earlier this month and posted here on March 24th is a fitting reference.
sung425 asks, "Why is this Iraq war policy all about Israel?".
ONLY for propaganda, distraction, deception, "show", ...; not because Israel is at all the real reason for the war and its continuation, which it definitely is NOT. People who judge based on appearances often are easily fooled into making mistaken judgement calls; ya gotta dig deep, to get to the underlying and hidden reality, so motives.
" USAn March 27th, 2008 12:09 pm
Let's make something clear. It is not "Shia vs. Shia". It is genuinely patriotic Iraqi's fighting puppet forces of under the traitorous friend of the occupier, Al Maliki.
Their sectarian affiliations has little to do with the conflict."
TRUE, those affiliations have "little to do with the conflict", but it's still Shia fighting against Shia. Nouri al-Maliki is Shia and traitor, both. An "American" who's traitor is still "American". Etc.
" skippyagogo41 March 27th, 2008 12:29 pm
Bombs are falling on the green zone…"
SOME humanitarian with money and appropriate connections should send the Mehdi more powerful weapons; for using those little mortars and rockets will take forever to obliterate the Green Zone. Send them some 2,000-pounders, f.e. May need to figure out a way for them to be able to use those though; being a little heavy to carry around and toss with bare arms.
" vinlander March 27th, 2008 1:08 pm
Al Maliki has miscalculated terribly here. ..."
IN THEORY, and humanitarianly, speaking, yes; he's miscalculated atrociously. But this is your and my, our perspective. As for his own perspective, well, his goals and ours clearly aren't aligned; therefore, he's only miscalculated in the sense that if the Iraqis ever win against this imperialist-West invasion and occupation, then he's going to need to be able to run very fast, else lynching is coming his way, for highest of treasons.
Real treason is always a miscalculation, yet it also depends, sort of anyway, on whether we consider the traitors' or the betrayed people's viewpoints. He's calculating that the U.S. will win, and he needs to be wrong about this. If he mistaken about that, then he's perhaps also mistaken in terms of expecting that the U.S. will see to his rescue, when and if the U.S. loses. The U.S. may just leave him right where he is, for he'll then no longer be of any value to the imperialist-West elites anyway.
The war in Iraq is more about the war in the U.S. a bloody distraction.
Hey, hey, hey, hey! This kind of news puts a damper on that thar "Surge" being a success and all.
Hey!
They aren't following the script!
Iraq isn't suppose to implode until AFTER the US troops leave!
Otherwise, how can the republicans blame the democrats for the country falling apart.
But then you knew it was going to happen sooner or later.
Let's just pray that our brave troops don't get caught in the middle.
Neo-con mouthpiece (this really happened):
"It's not a trend!" He shouted the same words, louder and louder.
Let's get out of Iraq, bringing every single American with us. Did the adults at the end of "Lord of the Flies" leave any kids behind to deal with the island?
No. Everyone was removed, even Jack,
the adolescent leader (a pre-mogrification of George W. Bush).
We can buy oil from Iraq instead of stealing it once we're out. But, if the economy is so bad we can't afford oil we
can A. go back to horses or B. walk.
Horses? Great idea, but there won't be enough oats because of food
shortages combined with biofuel agriculture. Walk? Yes, good for the health.
The 29 buildings of the American Embassy, though-- what about them? Take bets when they naturally will fall down from their shoddy construction-- that's what to do.
Listen. Vote for the candidate who says that he or she will bring out EVERY LAST
AMERICAN. If they won't say that, forget
'em. Anyone who would leave behind in Iraq small groups of Americans is not only sadistic but too dumb to be president.
Ambushes are breaking out in Central and Western Iraq. .It is now OPEN HUNTING on all Westerners. Roadside Bombs, Prophet(pbuh) Rockets, oil pipeline destruction are the Guerrillas activities of the day.
Bush and his Learning Disabled Generals are "clueless".
This civil war and destruction is not in this weeks "Reality TV" script..........
You don't get to be a General in the U.S. military unless you're a first-class political ass-kisser and liar. The U.S. media indoctrination is so thick that most U.S. citizens don't even understand THAT! Am I mistaken in assuming that it's a crime for an officer in the U.S. military to tell a lie? According to the Uniform Code of Military Justice, it is. If a commissioned officer is caught in a lie he (or she) is subject to Court Marshall and possible imprisonment. Look at how far we've sunk.
>> Why is this Iraq war policy all about Israel? Israel has always demanded the removal of Saddam Hussein.<<
And it says now that the USA must not let Iran get NUCLEAR WEAPONS, not that we (Israel) must not allow Iran to get nuclear weapons.
If there is one thing ALL the militias (inclusing the us army militia) want right now its an end to the occupation and withdrawal of US forces. That of course will never happen til whats left of Iraq will burn to the ground and we will have full control over our oil.
USAn said: "Let's make something clear. It is not "Shia vs. Shia". It is genuinely patriotic Iraqi's fighting puppet forces of under the traitorous friend of the occupier, Al Maliki.
Their sectarian affiliations has little to do with the conflict."
Damn straight, but we'll never hear it from the corporate sell-out we know of as the Mainstream Media. I wouldn't be surpised if a large part of those puppet forces aren't even Shia-based. Many of them may simply be any Iraqis and/or Arabs and Kurds, with no strong religious base, being paid as mercenaries.
These so-called government militias are also probably the ones that have been doing most of the torturing and killing that we've been hearing so much of. Real nice folks, with no qualms about drilling young boys eyes out and ditching their bodies in the sewers, just to scare the locals into submission.
Interesting that al-Maliki has called for the militias to hand in their arms, a move likely to be applauded by pro-war and neocons. But I wonder how many of these US folk are pro-gun and supporters of the 2nd Amendment?
The stench of hypocrisy is strong.
I am getting to where I could care less about Israel! They want to take someone else's land and live in that part of the world they need to learn to defend themselves! But, I am tired of my tax dollars going to prop them up! Of being expected to defend them because of their religion! When I don't believe in any of it anymore.
Everyone knew it was a matter of time before Iraq exploded into violence again. There isn't anyway Bush is going to control the factions fighting us and one another! He has a full scale civil war on his hands and is to stupid to admit it. He took out the only stabilizing force the country had...Saddam Hussein. That was the only thing that kept it from imploding years ago. That is the only way these people will ever be controllable. Is when they get another dictator like him who will use terror to keep them in line. They don't want democracy and never have wanted it. It's Bush's pipe dream to turn the middle east into a bastion of democracy! Not that the creep knows a thing about Democracy to begin with. He knows about as much about it as the Iraqi's do! That's as ludicrous as his numerous other self-gratifying speeches.
Something the Western media isn't tell us ... what's really going on with the fighting in Iraq. This is really important to understand and well outlined in this article ...
http://alternet.org/waroniraq/80580/
Please take the time to read it.
Aye. A "cleansing" of Basra is just an invitation to Iran, a provocation. W badly wants an 'incident', and this could well be it. The Brits were prudent enough to pull out, and we should follow their lead. This "civil war" could provide a face-saving rationale for requesting a UN peace-keeping force, but I keep thinking about this guy with the 88 IQ. How I wish I could have had the educational opportunity he la-la'd away. It's a waste of national resources to feed the guy.
Yes, canceling the elections would be like canceling the Super Bowl....
Total violent revolution would occur and Little George knows it.
His daddy wouldn't let him play football with us bigger kids...after Scott hit my chin ...Ouch! Three stitches in my tongue because we were playin a game that Big George started.... You see he had this habit of stickin out his tongue when he carried the ball and so us bigger kids made it a Play.... "Fullback up the middle with tongue hangin out like a freaking mad future war criminal President"...
Folks there will be elections!!!!
Scott Ritter predicted this and i will Hope President Obama wil promote Col Scott Ritter to General Chief of staff of the Security Council.
In a recent speech John McCain said that pulling out of Iraq would be a recipe for disaster. Maybe Joe Lieberman should whisper the definition of disaster in his ear.
A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed. This is what happens!